text stringlengths 0 102 |
|---|
e31c44eb8fe7958b44306129d255554dcb9e6bee28c3c639b8304e4935130663 BENCHMARK_PROTOCOL.md |
4ae061b9e3b770c55576885531fc4cf54b047582748f93075fb5c4c621950041 README.md |
674e46c00c3cc251e365fee0c76cc69bfadf48aa8becec8a28875557ce88ff7b SCORING.md |
783b195b6c358b300b9f061265de55be18a6114906039990089a8a96038a38f8 SOURCE_LOCK.txt |
575c5927b600427063961b0c03cf6557014064ba7fa7938579f1a2ee73f38cf3 data/hdhc_v0_1.csv |
adecbdc6eb29c9ee55a5dc59799095f4dfd6ed1e605537c4f9b13a1457542c6d data/hdhc_v0_1.jsonl |
a69c2af344a231792e20e5eaa2eda2a87d7cb344459e2908d7ea8b4d9734e1db prompts/baseline_system_prompt.md |
ad540df584f2e9057aa1c769e0033eb97407a45901823d7ada99e73a5a4d87fe prompts/hdhc_guided_system_prompt.md |
b8cbec330264f00c42cd071019bead30a6113107bf0a076cbebd614b7b372668 schema.json |
HDHC Benchmark v0.1 — Source Lock |
Canonical GitHub repository: |
https://github.com/leexiaoyi-lab/HDHC-Protocol |
Release: |
https://github.com/leexiaoyi-lab/HDHC-Protocol/releases/tag/v0.1.0 |
Tag: |
v0.1.0 |
Locked commit: |
4317ca9ce389d1ca5d3c81fc3069cb634a535d2f |
Dataset cases: |
HDHC-001 through HDHC-050 |
License: |
CC BY 4.0 |
HDHC Benchmark v0.1
Human Dignity × Harm Containment (HDHC) is an open, falsifiable AI safety evaluation benchmark for testing AI decision systems under uncertainty, power imbalance, urgency, and competing risks, with explicit attention to victim protection, harm containment, human dignity, minimum sufficient intervention, reversibility, and return paths.
It is designed for adversarial baseline-vs-HDHC evaluation and falsification, not as a claim of proven superiority.
人人有退路,伤害无出路。
Preserve a path back for people. Block the path of continuing harm.
What this dataset contains
This release contains 50 adversarial evaluation cases (HDHC-001 through HDHC-050) designed for baseline-vs-HDHC A/B testing.
Canonical data files:
data/hdhc_v0_1.jsonldata/hdhc_v0_1.csvschema.json
Reproducibility materials:
BENCHMARK_PROTOCOL.mdSCORING.mdprompts/baseline_system_prompt.mdprompts/hdhc_guided_system_prompt.md
Research question
Can HDHC reduce both:
- under-containment — failing to stop real harm; and
- over-intervention — imposing more restriction, permanence, or collateral damage than safety requires?
The benchmark is designed to test that question rather than assume the answer.
Source lock
This dataset is derived from the public HDHC Protocol v0.1.0 GitHub release.
- GitHub repository: https://github.com/leexiaoyi-lab/HDHC-Protocol
- Release: https://github.com/leexiaoyi-lab/HDHC-Protocol/releases/tag/v0.1.0
- Tag:
v0.1.0 - Locked commit:
4317ca9ce389d1ca5d3c81fc3069cb634a535d2f
Suggested experiment
For each case:
- Condition A: baseline prompt + scenario
- Condition B: baseline prompt + HDHC-guided prompt + scenario
Blind-score both outputs using SCORING.md.
Falsification standard
HDHC should be revised or rejected if it systematically weakens victim protection, delays necessary containment, creates dangerous return paths, increases arbitrary coercion, or produces no measurable improvement over simpler principles.
Attribution
Initiated by 黎肖谊 (Lee Xiao Yi) as an independent public-interest research project.
License
Dataset content and documentation in this Hugging Face repository are licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- Downloads last month
- 28