Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Parquet error: Scan size limit exceeded: attempted to read 2951830367 bytes, limit is 300000000 bytes Make sure that 1. the Parquet files contain a page index to enable random access without loading entire row groups2. otherwise use smaller row-group sizes when serializing the Parquet files
Error code:   TooBigContentError

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

Russian TTS MOS Evaluation Dataset

A curated Russian synthesized speech dataset with crowdsourced quality ratings.

Overview

This dataset contains Russian synthesized speech samples from multiple TTS systems and audio codec models, evaluated by human annotators via crowdsourcing. Quality ratings are provided in two dimensions: perceptual quality (MOS) and intelligibility (Int-MOS).

  • Language: Russian only
  • Sources: F5, FishSpeech, GPT-So-VITS, Tortoise, XTTS, EnCodec, WavTok, and internal encoder/decoder configurations
  • Format: Single Parquet file with embedded audio bytes
  • Access: Public

Usage

Load the dataset

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("YOUR_ORG/YOUR_DATASET_NAME")

Or just use script load_data_tts.py

Read audio from bytes

import io
import soundfile as sf

sample = ds["train"][0]

audio_array, sr = sf.read(io.BytesIO(sample["audio"]))

print(f"File:     {sample['filename']}")
print(f"MOS:      {sample['mos_mean']}")
print(f"Int-MOS:  {sample['int_mos_mean']}")

Data Structure

Each row corresponds to one audio file with aggregated scores from all annotators.

Column Type Description
inner_audio_id int Internal audio identifier from the labeling system
filename string Relative path to the audio file (e.g. F5/001234_RUSLAN.wav)
audio binary Raw audio bytes (wav)
mos_mean float or null Mean perceptual quality score (1–5); null if not rated
int_mos_mean float or null Mean intelligibility score (1–5); null if not rated
project string Source labeling project name

Evaluation Methodology

Ratings were collected via crowdsourcing across two independent evaluation tracks:

  • MOS — perceptual quality assessment following ITU-T P.800 (1 = bad, 5 = excellent)
  • Int-MOS — intelligibility assessment on the same 1–5 scale

Each sample may have one or both scores depending on which evaluation projects it was included in. A sample appearing in both tracks may carry two different inner_audio_id values — this is expected behavior from the labeling pipeline.

Model quality on unlabeled data was additionally estimated using Proxymos as a reference-free MOS predictor.

Contact

Downloads last month
4

Models trained or fine-tuned on lab260/mos260