pair_id stringlengths 34 66 | citing_case_id stringlengths 15 44 | citing_case_name stringlengths 8 30.9k | cited_case stringlengths 7 546 | inputs stringlengths 132 925 | label stringclasses 5
values | context stringlengths 53 846 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f2d_474/html/0001-01.html__-9114514083755190365 | f2d_474/html/0001-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel Dee VEON, Appellant. | 325 F.2d 867 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ted States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in any event we are satisfi... | OVERRULES | ted States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in any event we are satisfied that there was abundant evidence to support the verdict. We notice t |
f2d_474/html/0001-01.html__9022168677324292646 | f2d_474/html/0001-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel Dee VEON, Appellant. | Enriquez v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: t argues that the suffieiency-of-the-evidence point is not available on appeal because no objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 38... | OVERRULES | t argues that the suffieiency-of-the-evidence point is not available on appeal because no objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F... |
f2d_474/html/0001-01.html__-697182359831174422 | f2d_474/html/0001-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel Dee VEON, Appellant. | 380 U.S. 957 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9t... | OVERRULES | objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in any event we are sa |
f2d_474/html/0001-01.html__3593027895784411467 | f2d_474/html/0001-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel Dee VEON, Appellant. | Lucas v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: e trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in ... | OVERRULES | e trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in any event we are satisfied that there was abundant evidence to support the verd... |
f2d_474/html/0001-01.html__-3478461983813104276 | f2d_474/html/0001-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel Dee VEON, Appellant. | Cura v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: le on appeal because no objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United ... | OVERRULES | le on appeal because no objection was made on this basis at the close of the trial. Enriquez v. United States, 338 F.2d 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, Cura v. United States, 380 U.S. 957, 85 S.Ct. 1095, 13 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1963). We agree with the government. But in any ... |
f2d_474/html/0003-01.html__-4364780947025657983 | f2d_474/html/0003-01.html | John OTERO and Grace Otero, his wife, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS (IUE) an association, Ap-pellee. | 379 U.S. 650 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: e and arbitration procedure contained in the Council — IUE’s collective agreement is plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy. Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 652-659, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1964).
We agree with the district cou... | OVERRULES | e and arbitration procedure contained in the Council — IUE’s collective agreement is plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy. Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 652-659, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1964).
We agree with the district court that no claim is stated. See: Baca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S.Ct. |
f2d_474/html/0003-01.html__-3496296168184207985 | f2d_474/html/0003-01.html | John OTERO and Grace Otero, his wife, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS (IUE) an association, Ap-pellee. | Alonso v. Kaiser Aluminum | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: party is entitled to no more than he bargained for and received under the contract. Chambers v. Beaunit Corporation, 404 F.2d 128 (6th Cir. 1968).”
Alonso v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, D.C., 345 F.Supp. 1356, 1360 (1971), affir... | AFFIRMS | party is entitled to no more than he bargained for and received under the contract. Chambers v. Beaunit Corporation, 404 F.2d 128 (6th Cir. 1968).”
Alonso v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, D.C., 345 F.Supp. 1356, 1360 (1971), affirmed per curiam (4th Cir. 1972), 69 L.C. ¶ 13001.
The grievance and arbitration... |
f2d_474/html/0003-01.html__-7260828600507455214 | f2d_474/html/0003-01.html | John OTERO and Grace Otero, his wife, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS (IUE) an association, Ap-pellee. | Republic Steel v. Maddox | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: .C. ¶ 13001.
The grievance and arbitration procedure contained in the Council — IUE’s collective agreement is plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy. Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 652-659, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1964).
We a... | OVERRULES | .C. ¶ 13001.
The grievance and arbitration procedure contained in the Council — IUE’s collective agreement is plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy. Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 652-659, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1964).
We agree with the district court that no claim is stated. See: Baca v. Sipes, 386 U... |
f2d_474/html/0004-01.html__-7483582483453284224 | f2d_474/html/0004-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant. | 91 S.Ct. 1112 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: subject the transferor to civil and criminal penalties. (See sections 5852, 5861, and 5871, I.R.C.).” Cf. United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 605, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971). Thus, even if appellant might have invoked the exempti... | CITES_POSITIVELY | subject the transferor to civil and criminal penalties. (See sections 5852, 5861, and 5871, I.R.C.).” Cf. United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 605, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971). Thus, even if appellant might have invoked the exemption provisions of § 5852(a) he failed to fulfill the necessary condition |
f2d_474/html/0004-01.html__-2680985382022918877 | f2d_474/html/0004-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant. | 411 F.2d 1139 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: roper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).
The judgment is affirmed. | AFFIRMS | roper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).
The judgment is affirmed. |
f2d_474/html/0004-01.html__5466248184780143589 | f2d_474/html/0004-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant. | See Tenorio v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: pe might be put. We have examined the transcript of the arguments, and we agree with the trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S... | CITES_POSITIVELY | pe might be put. We have examined the transcript of the arguments, and we agree with the trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 196... |
f2d_474/html/0004-01.html__-5412310718035067908 | f2d_474/html/0004-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant. | 89 S.Ct. 169 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: e trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).
The... | AFFIRMS | e trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).
The judgment is affirmed. |
f2d_474/html/0004-01.html__-317183496389941070 | f2d_474/html/0004-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant. | 393 U.S. 874 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: agree with the trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir... | AFFIRMS | agree with the trial court that the comments were invited and not improper. See Tenorio v. United States, 390 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 169, 21 L.Ed.2d 145; Chatman v. United States, 411 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).
The judgment is affirmed. |
f2d_474/html/0006-01.html__2556064196922074023 | f2d_474/html/0006-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon Fred JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. | 436 F.2d 101 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: s Miranda rights. A Miranda waiver may be implied where warranted from the facts and circumstances of the particular case. United States v. Hilliker, 436 F.2d 101 (9th Cir., 1970). Though the court must find that a defendant waived his right... | OVERRULES | s Miranda rights. A Miranda waiver may be implied where warranted from the facts and circumstances of the particular case. United States v. Hilliker, 436 F.2d 101 (9th Cir., 1970). Though the court must find that a defendant waived his rights knowingly before it admits his statements in evidence, it is not requ |
f2d_474/html/0006-01.html__-170943228084765107 | f2d_474/html/0006-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon Fred JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. | United States v. Hilliker | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: defendant to have waived his Miranda rights. A Miranda waiver may be implied where warranted from the facts and circumstances of the particular case. United States v. Hilliker, 436 F.2d 101 (9th Cir., 1970). Though the court must find that a... | OVERRULES | defendant to have waived his Miranda rights. A Miranda waiver may be implied where warranted from the facts and circumstances of the particular case. United States v. Hilliker, 436 F.2d 101 (9th Cir., 1970). Though the court must find that a defendant waived his rights knowingly before it admits his statements in evide... |
f2d_474/html/0006-01.html__2553211345015851253 | f2d_474/html/0006-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon Fred JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. | Jackson v. Denno | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ial court’s determinations were supported by the evidence. A hearing on the issue of voluntariness was held out of the jury’s presence as required by Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed. 2d 908 (1964). Upon hearing the con... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ial court’s determinations were supported by the evidence. A hearing on the issue of voluntariness was held out of the jury’s presence as required by Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed. 2d 908 (1964). Upon hearing the conflicting testimony concerning the events surrounding the statements of Marc |
f2d_474/html/0008-01.html__4600168986247796353 | f2d_474/html/0008-01.html | YORK-SHIPLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 82 S.Ct. 691 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: has such a “personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure . . . concrete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.C... | CITES_POSITIVELY | has such a “personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure . . . concrete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S. |
f2d_474/html/0008-01.html__-7980423673185038138 | f2d_474/html/0008-01.html | YORK-SHIPLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. | Flast v. Cohen | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: . Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947. York-Shipley has no ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | . Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947. York-Shipley has no interest in the outcome of this suit, other than that of an unsecured cre |
f2d_474/html/0008-01.html__59815582184557098 | f2d_474/html/0008-01.html | YORK-SHIPLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 88 S.Ct. 1942 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: . 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947. York-Shipley has no interest in the outcome of this suit, ot... | CITES_POSITIVELY | . 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947. York-Shipley has no interest in the outcome of this suit, other than that of an unsecured creditor of its foreign customer. Such an |
f2d_474/html/0008-01.html__3094125085076479051 | f2d_474/html/0008-01.html | YORK-SHIPLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 369 U.S. 186 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: n whether the party has such a “personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure . . . concrete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U... | CITES_POSITIVELY | n whether the party has such a “personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure . . . concrete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 |
f2d_474/html/0008-01.html__-8149217705616972148 | f2d_474/html/0008-01.html | YORK-SHIPLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 92 S.Ct. 1361 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ete adverseness. . . .” Baker v. Carr, 1962, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663; See Sierra Club v. Morton, 1971, 405 U.S. 727, 732, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636; Flast v. Cohen, 1968, 392 U.S. 83, 101, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947. York-Shipley has no interest in the outcome of this suit, oth |
f2d_474/html/0009-01.html__8314974129427321250 | f2d_474/html/0009-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Im HATTON, Individually and doing business as Air Control Engineering Company, Defendant-Appellee. | 408 F.2d 626 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: is engaged in only one business. See Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc., 4 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 186; Wirtz v. Melos Construction Corp., 2 Cir. 1969, 408 F.2d 626; the textual references to a single establishment in Sections 3(r) and (s) of t... | CITES_POSITIVELY | is engaged in only one business. See Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc., 4 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 186; Wirtz v. Melos Construction Corp., 2 Cir. 1969, 408 F.2d 626; the textual references to a single establishment in Sections 3(r) and (s) of the Act, Title 29 U.S.C. Section 203(r) and (s); H.Rept.No.75, Fair Lab |
f2d_474/html/0009-01.html__-3539666217552598556 | f2d_474/html/0009-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Im HATTON, Individually and doing business as Air Control Engineering Company, Defendant-Appellee. | Wirtz v. Melos Construction Corp | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: pt from the Act’s requirements solely because it is engaged in only one business. See Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc., 4 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 186; Wirtz v. Melos Construction Corp., 2 Cir. 1969, 408 F.2d 626; the textual references to a s... | CITES_POSITIVELY | pt from the Act’s requirements solely because it is engaged in only one business. See Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc., 4 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 186; Wirtz v. Melos Construction Corp., 2 Cir. 1969, 408 F.2d 626; the textual references to a single establishment in Sections 3(r) and (s) of the Act, Title 29 U.S.C. Sectio... |
f2d_474/html/0009-01.html__-3769129673624043821 | f2d_474/html/0009-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Im HATTON, Individually and doing business as Air Control Engineering Company, Defendant-Appellee. | 426 F.2d 1135 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: lee was introduced into the law by amendment in 1961. We stated the purpose of “enterprise coverage” in Montalvo v. Tower Life Building, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 1135, 1139. Limiting coverage of the Act to enterprises which are in more than one... | OVERRULES | lee was introduced into the law by amendment in 1961. We stated the purpose of “enterprise coverage” in Montalvo v. Tower Life Building, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 1135, 1139. Limiting coverage of the Act to enterprises which are in more than one business would frustrate that purpose of eliminating fragmentation of t |
f2d_474/html/0012-01.html__9112129506330587877 | f2d_474/html/0012-01.html | Martha A. WILLGING, Individually and as executrix of the estate of John Z. Willging, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. | Bath v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: -property and common-law states, not to provide a special benefit to community-property taxpayers. Stanley v. C. I. R., 338 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1964); Bath v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 368, 370 (S.D.Tex. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 323 F.2d 980... | OVERRULES | -property and common-law states, not to provide a special benefit to community-property taxpayers. Stanley v. C. I. R., 338 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1964); Bath v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 368, 370 (S.D.Tex. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 323 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1963).
Reversed. |
f2d_474/html/0012-01.html__2829817206358565257 | f2d_474/html/0012-01.html | Martha A. WILLGING, Individually and as executrix of the estate of John Z. Willging, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. | 323 F.2d 980 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: property taxpayers. Stanley v. C. I. R., 338 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1964); Bath v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 368, 370 (S.D.Tex. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 323 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1963).
Reversed. | OVERRULES | property taxpayers. Stanley v. C. I. R., 338 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1964); Bath v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 368, 370 (S.D.Tex. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 323 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1963).
Reversed. |
f2d_474/html/0012-01.html__1988877837236405652 | f2d_474/html/0012-01.html | Martha A. WILLGING, Individually and as executrix of the estate of John Z. Willging, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. | United States v. Catto | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ers. We see no reason to force the Commissioner to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ers. We see no reason to force the Commissioner to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only half of the accrued increase in value of the inventories was taxed on the death... |
f2d_474/html/0012-01.html__-1240208707771432298 | f2d_474/html/0012-01.html | Martha A. WILLGING, Individually and as executrix of the estate of John Z. Willging, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. | 384 U.S. 102 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: force the Commissioner to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only half of the accrued incre... | OVERRULES | force the Commissioner to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only half of the accrued increase in value of the inventories was taxed on the death of Mr. Willging |
f2d_474/html/0012-01.html__-7788738396160701994 | f2d_474/html/0012-01.html | Martha A. WILLGING, Individually and as executrix of the estate of John Z. Willging, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. | 86 S.Ct. 1311 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only half of the accrued increase in value of the inv... | OVERRULES | to permit all accrual-basis farmers effectively to switch to the cash basis in the year of death. Cf. United States v. Catto, 384 U.S. 102, 113-117, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398 (1966).
Only half of the accrued increase in value of the inventories was taxed on the death of Mr. Willging because the other half |
f2d_474/html/0014-01.html__5081987677877432518 | f2d_474/html/0014-01.html | In the Matter of GREEN MILL INN, INC., a California corporation, Bankrupt 117739. Kal W. LINES, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellant, v. The NATIONAL CASH REGISTER COMPANY, Appellee. | 466 F.2d 51 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: est of the seller against rival creditors.
The district judge who decided this case also decided In re Thomas, 310 F.Supp. 338 (N.D.Cal.1970), aff’d 466 F.2d 51 (9th Cir. 1972). There, an individual (Thomas), doing business under a fictitio... | OVERRULES | est of the seller against rival creditors.
The district judge who decided this case also decided In re Thomas, 310 F.Supp. 338 (N.D.Cal.1970), aff’d 466 F.2d 51 (9th Cir. 1972). There, an individual (Thomas), doing business under a fictitious name (West Coast Avionics), bought goods under a conditional-sale c |
f2d_474/html/0016-01.html__-2713236346037137437 | f2d_474/html/0016-01.html | Jerry WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L. B. SULLIVAN, Commissioner of Alabama Prison System, et al., Respondents-Appellees. | 406 F.2d 1158 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: 2201 and 2202.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
. See Andrade v. Hauck, 5th Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 1071. | CITES_POSITIVELY | 2201 and 2202.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
. See Andrade v. Hauck, 5th Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 1071. |
f2d_474/html/0016-01.html__1939391428648039913 | f2d_474/html/0016-01.html | Jerry WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L. B. SULLIVAN, Commissioner of Alabama Prison System, et al., Respondents-Appellees. | See Andrade v. Hauck | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
. See Andrade v. Hauck, 5th Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 1071. | CITES_POSITIVELY | It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
. See Andrade v. Hauck, 5th Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 1071. |
f2d_474/html/0016-01.html__588318863418883768 | f2d_474/html/0016-01.html | Jerry WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L. B. SULLIVAN, Commissioner of Alabama Prison System, et al., Respondents-Appellees. | A similar situation was presented to this Court in Massimo v. Henderson | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: imself and the other prisoners of Mt. Meigs who face the daily threat of suffering from the denial of access to court while in solitary confinement.
A similar situation was presented to this Court in Massimo v. Henderson, 5th Cir. 1972, 468... | OVERRULES | imself and the other prisoners of Mt. Meigs who face the daily threat of suffering from the denial of access to court while in solitary confinement.
A similar situation was presented to this Court in Massimo v. Henderson, 5th Cir. 1972, 468 F.2d 1209. In that case the appellant, who was incarcerated in the United Stat... |
f2d_474/html/0018-01.html__-1397125054883339358 | f2d_474/html/0018-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA, LTD., and Great Southwest Atlanta Corp., Defendants-Appellants. | 472 F.2d 42 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: s in no better position. It is the character of the work, not the source of the remuneration, that controls. Cf. Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc., 5 Cir., 472 F.2d 42 (1973) (fact employees “changing the premises” are on hotel pay-roll irrelevant... | OVERRULES | s in no better position. It is the character of the work, not the source of the remuneration, that controls. Cf. Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc., 5 Cir., 472 F.2d 42 (1973) (fact employees “changing the premises” are on hotel pay-roll irrelevant). The nature of the work is what gives rise to the need for an exempt |
f2d_474/html/0018-01.html__2741723953532585668 | f2d_474/html/0018-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA, LTD., and Great Southwest Atlanta Corp., Defendants-Appellants. | Hodgson v. Colonnades | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: g a recreational establishment. GSA is in no better position. It is the character of the work, not the source of the remuneration, that controls. Cf. Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc., 5 Cir., 472 F.2d 42 (1973) (fact employees “changing the premi... | OVERRULES | g a recreational establishment. GSA is in no better position. It is the character of the work, not the source of the remuneration, that controls. Cf. Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc., 5 Cir., 472 F.2d 42 (1973) (fact employees “changing the premises” are on hotel pay-roll irrelevant). The nature of the work is what gives ri... |
f2d_474/html/0018-01.html__-7032889328149613205 | f2d_474/html/0018-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA, LTD., and Great Southwest Atlanta Corp., Defendants-Appellants. | Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: fference that the employee is doing mixed work. In any week that any particular employee does some non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir.,... | OVERRULES | fference that the employee is doing mixed work. In any week that any particular employee does some non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 913. GSA says that this makes an accounting problem for it. Wit... |
f2d_474/html/0018-01.html__1719948200889808912 | f2d_474/html/0018-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA, LTD., and Great Southwest Atlanta Corp., Defendants-Appellants. | 263 F.2d 913 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 913. GSA says that this makes an accounting problem for it. With the. legislation o... | AFFIRMS | non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 913. GSA says that this makes an accounting problem for it. With the. legislation on the books, the problem is of its own making.
Affirmed. |
f2d_474/html/0018-01.html__-5438025492990934156 | f2d_474/html/0018-01.html | Peter J. BRENNAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIX FLAGS OVER GEORGIA, LTD., and Great Southwest Atlanta Corp., Defendants-Appellants. | 464 F.2d 1219 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: any week that any particular employee does some non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 913. GSA says that this makes an ac... | OVERRULES | any week that any particular employee does some non-exempt work he is covered fully, not pro rata. Hodgson v. Wittenburg Livestock Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 464 F.2d 1219; Mitchell v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 913. GSA says that this makes an accounting problem for it. With the. legislation on the books, the problem |
f2d_474/html/0019-01.html__8464333716090451590 | f2d_474/html/0019-01.html | Gregorio P. VALDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. P. PERINI, Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. | The reason for such a result was explained in Desist v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: re given in the body of that opinion.
In our opinion, the fact that Mor-rissey was applied retroactively to Morrissey himself, creates no confusion. The reason for such a result was explained in Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.C... | OVERRULES | re given in the body of that opinion.
In our opinion, the fact that Mor-rissey was applied retroactively to Morrissey himself, creates no confusion. The reason for such a result was explained in Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1030, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969), wherein Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88... |
f2d_474/html/0019-01.html__-5970052684500386040 | f2d_474/html/0019-01.html | Gregorio P. VALDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. P. PERINI, Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. | 392 U.S. 946 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: no constitutional right to a hearing prior to a parole revocation, relying on our decision in Rose v. Haskins, 388 F.2d 91 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 946, 88 S.Ct. 2300, 20 L.Ed.2d 1408 (1968).
Petitioner then appealed to this Court... | FOLLOWS | no constitutional right to a hearing prior to a parole revocation, relying on our decision in Rose v. Haskins, 388 F.2d 91 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 946, 88 S.Ct. 2300, 20 L.Ed.2d 1408 (1968).
Petitioner then appealed to this Court. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the Rules of this Circuit, we ordered that the |
f2d_474/html/0019-01.html__1187107993998926738 | f2d_474/html/0019-01.html | Gregorio P. VALDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. P. PERINI, Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. | 91 S.Ct. 1041 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: with Williams v. United States, 401 U.S. 646, 91 S.Ct. 1148, 28 L.Ed.2d 388 (1971) and United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971). | OVERRULES | with Williams v. United States, 401 U.S. 646, 91 S.Ct. 1148, 28 L.Ed.2d 388 (1971) and United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971). |
f2d_474/html/0021-01.html__3958539895649609602 | f2d_474/html/0021-01.html | Robert Edward LEHMAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al. | Krzewinski v. Kugler | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: .Supp. 85 (D.Dela., filed Dec. 6, 1972) (3-judge court) (Adams, Circuit Judge); Wellford v. Battaglia, 343 F.Supp. 143 (D.Dela.1972) (Stapleton, J.); Krzewinski v. Kugler, 338 F.Supp. 492 (D.N.J.1972) (3-judge court) | OVERRULES | .Supp. 85 (D.Dela., filed Dec. 6, 1972) (3-judge court) (Adams, Circuit Judge); Wellford v. Battaglia, 343 F.Supp. 143 (D.Dela.1972) (Stapleton, J.); Krzewinski v. Kugler, 338 F.Supp. 492 (D.N.J.1972) (3-judge court) |
f2d_474/html/0021-01.html__1092976160614747012 | f2d_474/html/0021-01.html | Robert Edward LEHMAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al. | Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: its for damages and is not, therefore, subject to suit. This holding has been extended to bar such suits against city agencies, United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1969); see Pierson v. Ray, 386... | CITES_POSITIVELY | its for damages and is not, therefore, subject to suit. This holding has been extended to bar such suits against city agencies, United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1969); see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). It has also been applied by th... |
f2d_474/html/0021-01.html__-961207534207994348 | f2d_474/html/0021-01.html | Robert Edward LEHMAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al. | 472 F.2d 612 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). It has also been applied by this Court to § 1983 suits for injunctive relief. Educational Equality League v. Tate, 472 F.2d 612, n. 1 (3d Cir., filed Jan 11, 1973).
As to the individual defendants, we reve... | OVERRULES | S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). It has also been applied by this Court to § 1983 suits for injunctive relief. Educational Equality League v. Tate, 472 F.2d 612, n. 1 (3d Cir., filed Jan 11, 1973).
As to the individual defendants, we reverse and remand since it is clear that such officials and employees of c |
f2d_474/html/0021-01.html__-3279612985634055528 | f2d_474/html/0021-01.html | Robert Edward LEHMAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al. | 386 U.S. 547 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: o bar such suits against city agencies, United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1969); see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). It has also been applied by this Court ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | o bar such suits against city agencies, United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1969); see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). It has also been applied by this Court to § 1983 suits for injunctive relief. Educational Equality League v. T |
f2d_474/html/0021-01.html__-6459728783914524643 | f2d_474/html/0021-01.html | Robert Edward LEHMAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al. | Wellford v. Battaglia | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Walker v. Yucht, 352 F.Supp. 85 (D.Dela., filed Dec. 6, 1972) (3-judge court) (Adams, Circuit Judge); Wellford v. Battaglia, 343 F.Supp. 143 (D.Dela.1972) (Stapleton, J.); Krzewinski v. Kugler,... | OVERRULES | U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Walker v. Yucht, 352 F.Supp. 85 (D.Dela., filed Dec. 6, 1972) (3-judge court) (Adams, Circuit Judge); Wellford v. Battaglia, 343 F.Supp. 143 (D.Dela.1972) (Stapleton, J.); Krzewinski v. Kugler, 338 F.Supp. 492 (D.N.J.1972) (3-judge court) |
f2d_474/html/0022-01.html__7345539285985772612 | f2d_474/html/0022-01.html | James Hugh RIDGEWAY, Appellant, v. Terrell Don HUTTO, Commissioner of Correction, State of Arkansas, Appellee. | United States v. Covington | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: icinity of the crime, another person committed both the shooting and knifing. Thus, the variant proof did not prejudice the defendant’s defense. See, United States v. Covington, 411 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1969). In addition, there is no i... | OVERRULES | icinity of the crime, another person committed both the shooting and knifing. Thus, the variant proof did not prejudice the defendant’s defense. See, United States v. Covington, 411 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1969). In addition, there is no indication that the appellant was surprised by the variant proof and no motion w... |
f2d_474/html/0022-01.html__-5439301683955953372 | f2d_474/html/0022-01.html | James Hugh RIDGEWAY, Appellant, v. Terrell Don HUTTO, Commissioner of Correction, State of Arkansas, Appellee. | 88 S.Ct. 493 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: t, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 516 at 378-379 (1969); cf., McIntyre v. United States, 380 F.2d 822, 826 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 992, 88 S.Ct. 493, 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967).
In any event, a careful examination of the record rev... | OVERRULES | t, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 516 at 378-379 (1969); cf., McIntyre v. United States, 380 F.2d 822, 826 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 992, 88 S.Ct. 493, 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967).
In any event, a careful examination of the record reveals that the appellant was not prejudiced by the fact that the proof v |
f2d_474/html/0022-01.html__-3769125521490278901 | f2d_474/html/0022-01.html | James Hugh RIDGEWAY, Appellant, v. Terrell Don HUTTO, Commissioner of Correction, State of Arkansas, Appellee. | McIntyre v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: iant proof submitted by the state so as to preserve this question for appeal. 2 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 516 at 378-379 (1969); cf., McIntyre v. United States, 380 F.2d 822, 826 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 992, 88 S.C... | OVERRULES | iant proof submitted by the state so as to preserve this question for appeal. 2 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 516 at 378-379 (1969); cf., McIntyre v. United States, 380 F.2d 822, 826 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 992, 88 S.Ct. 493, 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967).
In any event, a careful examination of the reco... |
f2d_474/html/0024-01.html__7118680460539132800 | f2d_474/html/0024-01.html | Gene Patrick GAREAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. | United States v. Morgan | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: federal sentence when the petition was filed, the attack on his federal conviction was “moot.”
Consistent with the teaching of the Supreme Court in United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 505, 74 S.Ct. 247, 249, 98 L.Ed. 248 (1954), that “in... | AFFIRMS | federal sentence when the petition was filed, the attack on his federal conviction was “moot.”
Consistent with the teaching of the Supreme Court in United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 505, 74 S.Ct. 247, 249, 98 L.Ed. 248 (1954), that “in behalf of the unfortunates, federal courts should act in doing justice if the ... |
f2d_474/html/0024-01.html__-467437215281615868 | f2d_474/html/0024-01.html | Gene Patrick GAREAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. | Decker v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ling was to be given retroactive application. See United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971); Decker v. United States, 402 U.S. 937, 91 S.Ct. 1604, 29 L.Ed.2d 106 (1971), vacating and r... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ling was to be given retroactive application. See United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971); Decker v. United States, 402 U.S. 937, 91 S.Ct. 1604, 29 L.Ed.2d 106 (1971), vacating and remanding 423 F.2d 726 (6th Cir. 1970).
On the authority of these decisions, ap... |
f2d_474/html/0024-01.html__9177552448631110155 | f2d_474/html/0024-01.html | Gene Patrick GAREAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. | See United States v. Morgan | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: rm. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the 1965 federal judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed pursuant thereto. See United States v. Morgan, supra, 346 U.S. at 513, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248.
Reversed ... | OVERRULES | rm. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the 1965 federal judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed pursuant thereto. See United States v. Morgan, supra, 346 U.S. at 513, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248.
Reversed and remanded. |
f2d_474/html/0024-01.html__1429620428162284434 | f2d_474/html/0024-01.html | Gene Patrick GAREAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. | 402 U.S. 937 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: oactive application. See United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971); Decker v. United States, 402 U.S. 937, 91 S.Ct. 1604, 29 L.Ed.2d 106 (1971), vacating and remanding 423 F.2d 726 (6t... | CITES_POSITIVELY | oactive application. See United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971); Decker v. United States, 402 U.S. 937, 91 S.Ct. 1604, 29 L.Ed.2d 106 (1971), vacating and remanding 423 F.2d 726 (6th Cir. 1970).
On the authority of these decisions, appellant filed a p |
f2d_474/html/0025-01.html__-5866729077217835008 | f2d_474/html/0025-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo Anna Newby CARAWAY a/k/a Jo Newby and Daniel Elden Scales, Defendants-Appellants. | United States v. Kelehar | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: denial of the motion to suppress, this Court has felt constrained to honor such an agreement. United States v. Rosenberg, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1183; United States v. Kelehar, 5 Cir. 1972, 470 F.2d 176. Cf., United States v. Wysocki, 1972, 4... | CITES_POSITIVELY | denial of the motion to suppress, this Court has felt constrained to honor such an agreement. United States v. Rosenberg, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1183; United States v. Kelehar, 5 Cir. 1972, 470 F.2d 176. Cf., United States v. Wysocki, 1972, 457 F.2d 1155, 1162. See also Jaben v. United States, 8 Cir. 1964, 333 F.2d 535,... |
f2d_474/html/0025-01.html__-3763721628918776570 | f2d_474/html/0025-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo Anna Newby CARAWAY a/k/a Jo Newby and Daniel Elden Scales, Defendants-Appellants. | Carroll v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: 1(a).
I. The Border Search Justification
Customs officials conducting' border searches have the exceptional power to search without probable cause. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Cervantes v. Unit... | OVERRULES | 1(a).
I. The Border Search Justification
Customs officials conducting' border searches have the exceptional power to search without probable cause. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Cervantes v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 263 F.2d 800, 803; King v. United States, 9 Cir. 1965, ... |
f2d_474/html/0025-01.html__2441901603940181638 | f2d_474/html/0025-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo Anna Newby CARAWAY a/k/a Jo Newby and Daniel Elden Scales, Defendants-Appellants. | Cervantes v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: order searches have the exceptional power to search without probable cause. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Cervantes v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 263 F.2d 800, 803; King v. United States, 9 Cir. 1... | OVERRULES | order searches have the exceptional power to search without probable cause. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Cervantes v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 263 F.2d 800, 803; King v. United States, 9 Cir. 1965, 348 F.2d 814, 817. That power, although enabling “mere suspicion”based sea... |
f2d_474/html/0032-01.html__4591666816780921272 | f2d_474/html/0032-01.html | Richard J. SENNOTT and Joan Sennott, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RODMAN & RENSHAW, Defendant-Appellant. | 419 F.2d 34 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: shed and need not be repeated here. The applicable standards are collected and summarizd by Judge Hastings in Prince v. Packer Manufacturing Company, 419 F.2d 34, 36-37 (7th Cir. 1969). Assigning the matter of credibility to the district cou... | OVERRULES | shed and need not be repeated here. The applicable standards are collected and summarizd by Judge Hastings in Prince v. Packer Manufacturing Company, 419 F.2d 34, 36-37 (7th Cir. 1969). Assigning the matter of credibility to the district court we turn therefore to a determination of whether there is substantia |
f2d_474/html/0032-01.html__-6082550961225044925 | f2d_474/html/0032-01.html | Richard J. SENNOTT and Joan Sennott, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RODMAN & RENSHAW, Defendant-Appellant. | The applicable standards are collected and summarizd by Judge Hastings in Prince v. Packer Manufacturing Company | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: dan Rothbart, Section 20(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a).
The ground rules for our review are well-established and need not be repeated here. The applicable standards are collected and summarizd by Judge Hastings in Prince v. Packer ... | OVERRULES | dan Rothbart, Section 20(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a).
The ground rules for our review are well-established and need not be repeated here. The applicable standards are collected and summarizd by Judge Hastings in Prince v. Packer Manufacturing Company, 419 F.2d 34, 36-37 (7th Cir. 1969). Assigning the matter... |
f2d_474/html/0032-01.html__-3351361187315587651 | f2d_474/html/0032-01.html | Richard J. SENNOTT and Joan Sennott, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RODMAN & RENSHAW, Defendant-Appellant. | The Sennotts also place considerable reliance on Blackburn v. Dean Witter | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ed, I really felt that this thing would have completely gone undetected by Rodman & Renshaw had not that check been made out of the profit sharing.”
The Sennotts also place considerable reliance on Blackburn v. Dean Witter, 201 Cal.App.2d 5... | OVERRULES | ed, I really felt that this thing would have completely gone undetected by Rodman & Renshaw had not that check been made out of the profit sharing.”
The Sennotts also place considerable reliance on Blackburn v. Dean Witter, 201 Cal.App.2d 518, 19 Cal.Rptr. 842 (5th Dist.Ct.App.1962), a case which they assert is “squar... |
f2d_474/html/0032-01.html__4739992752816453694 | f2d_474/html/0032-01.html | Richard J. SENNOTT and Joan Sennott, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RODMAN & RENSHAW, Defendant-Appellant. | Citing Crittendon v. State Oil Company | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: whether William Rothbart had ever participated or conspired with Jordan to perpetrate the option fraud, he had replied, “[N]o, not to my knowledge.”
Citing Crittendon v. State Oil Company, 78 Ill.App.2d 112, 115, 222 N.E.2d 561, 563-564 (19... | CITES_POSITIVELY | whether William Rothbart had ever participated or conspired with Jordan to perpetrate the option fraud, he had replied, “[N]o, not to my knowledge.”
Citing Crittendon v. State Oil Company, 78 Ill.App.2d 112, 115, 222 N.E.2d 561, 563-564 (1966), Sennott contends on this appeal that Rodman & Renshaw is estopped by its c... |
f2d_474/html/0040-01.html__-5333655059901817854 | f2d_474/html/0040-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank GERVATO, Appellee. | 394 U.S. 165 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: . If anything, the Supreme Court has indicated in dictum that a search is permissible in the absence of the occupant. Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 178, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969). See also Blakey, Aspects of the Evidence... | CITES_POSITIVELY | . If anything, the Supreme Court has indicated in dictum that a search is permissible in the absence of the occupant. Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 178, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969). See also Blakey, Aspects of the Evidence Gathering Process in Organized Crime Cases: A Preliminary Analysi |
f2d_474/html/0040-01.html__-4997961487389116797 | f2d_474/html/0040-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank GERVATO, Appellee. | 365 U.S. 610 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: or occupant of the property searched. See, e. g., Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483, 84 S.Ct. 889, 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961); Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 46 ... | OVERRULES | or occupant of the property searched. See, e. g., Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483, 84 S.Ct. 889, 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961); Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 46 S.Ct. 4, 70 L.Ed. 145 (1925); Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 |
f2d_474/html/0040-01.html__5478410681951166338 | f2d_474/html/0040-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank GERVATO, Appellee. | 89 S.Ct. 961 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: the Supreme Court has indicated in dictum that a search is permissible in the absence of the occupant. Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 178, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969). See also Blakey, Aspects of the Evidence Gathering Proc... | CITES_POSITIVELY | the Supreme Court has indicated in dictum that a search is permissible in the absence of the occupant. Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 178, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969). See also Blakey, Aspects of the Evidence Gathering Process in Organized Crime Cases: A Preliminary Analysis, in The President |
f2d_474/html/0040-01.html__-2845921151846772091 | f2d_474/html/0040-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank GERVATO, Appellee. | Wilkes v. Wood | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: merican Revolution, the use of general warrants to aid in prosecutions for seditious libel was judicially condemned in England in two landmark cases, Wilkes v. Wood, 19 How.St.Tr. 1153 (1763) and Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029 (176... | OVERRULES | merican Revolution, the use of general warrants to aid in prosecutions for seditious libel was judicially condemned in England in two landmark cases, Wilkes v. Wood, 19 How.St.Tr. 1153 (1763) and Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029 (1765). In the former case, John Wilkes had boldly denounced the English gove |
f2d_474/html/0046-01.html__6508819991242371940 | f2d_474/html/0046-01.html | Donald DAVIS, Jr., a minor by His mother and next friend, Mrs. Sadie Davis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF PONTIAC, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 443 F.2d 573 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: on a finding of purposeful segregation of the school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 913, 92 S.Ct. 233, 30 L.Ed.2d 186 (197... | AFFIRMS | on a finding of purposeful segregation of the school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 913, 92 S.Ct. 233, 30 L.Ed.2d 186 (1971). In affirming this earlier order, we remanded the case to the Distri |
f2d_474/html/0046-01.html__5793593529560459143 | f2d_474/html/0046-01.html | Donald DAVIS, Jr., a minor by His mother and next friend, Mrs. Sadie Davis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF PONTIAC, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 91 S.Ct. 1267 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: xcept as and unless such policy creates a condition which offends the Constitution. As pointed out in Swann v. Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15-16, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1276, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971):
“However, a school desegregation case does not... | OVERRULES | xcept as and unless such policy creates a condition which offends the Constitution. As pointed out in Swann v. Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15-16, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1276, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971):
“However, a school desegregation case does not differ fundamentally from other eases involving the framing of equitabl |
f2d_474/html/0046-01.html__-4989700178963156472 | f2d_474/html/0046-01.html | Donald DAVIS, Jr., a minor by His mother and next friend, Mrs. Sadie Davis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF PONTIAC, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 404 U.S. 913 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: e school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 913, 92 S.Ct. 233, 30 L.Ed.2d 186 (1971). In affirming this earlier order, we rema... | AFFIRMS | e school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 913, 92 S.Ct. 233, 30 L.Ed.2d 186 (1971). In affirming this earlier order, we remanded the case to the District Court for continuing supervision of the d |
f2d_474/html/0046-01.html__887305722301610377 | f2d_474/html/0046-01.html | Donald DAVIS, Jr., a minor by His mother and next friend, Mrs. Sadie Davis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF PONTIAC, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. | See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: is supplementary to a comprehensive desegregation order entered by the District Court upon a finding of purposeful segregation of the school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443... | AFFIRMS | is supplementary to a comprehensive desegregation order entered by the District Court upon a finding of purposeful segregation of the school system. See Davis v. School District of City of Pontiac, 309 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 443 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 913, 92 S.Ct. 233, 30 L.Ed.2d... |
f2d_474/html/0049-01.html__9004004406943784769 | f2d_474/html/0049-01.html | BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. | This identical issue was the subject of a motion for rehearing of the instant case before the NLRB after the Supreme Court decided Allied Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: o case law which squarely supports the proposition that the specific insurance carrier for a group health plan is a mandatory subject for bargaining. This identical issue was the subject of a motion for rehearing of the instant case before t... | CITES_POSITIVELY | o case law which squarely supports the proposition that the specific insurance carrier for a group health plan is a mandatory subject for bargaining. This identical issue was the subject of a motion for rehearing of the instant case before the NLRB after the Supreme Court decided Allied Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh P... |
f2d_474/html/0049-01.html__-7985310616344599641 | f2d_474/html/0049-01.html | BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. | NLRB v. Scam Instrument Corp | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: of Section 8(a)(5). Benefits for retired employees were not involved.
Health insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining. NLRB v. Scam Instrument Corp., 394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968); McLean v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 84 (6... | OVERRULES | of Section 8(a)(5). Benefits for retired employees were not involved.
Health insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining. NLRB v. Scam Instrument Corp., 394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968); McLean v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964); Inland Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir.), cert. den... |
f2d_474/html/0049-01.html__-2078747544394918937 | f2d_474/html/0049-01.html | BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. | 369 U.S. 736 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: teral change violates the express language of both Section 8(d) and Section 8(a)(5).
We believe the controlling case on this issue, is NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 82 S.Ct. 1107, 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962), wherein the Supreme Court said:
The dut... | OVERRULES | teral change violates the express language of both Section 8(d) and Section 8(a)(5).
We believe the controlling case on this issue, is NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 82 S.Ct. 1107, 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962), wherein the Supreme Court said:
The duty “to bargain collectively” enjoined by § 8(a)(5) is defined by § 8(d) |
f2d_474/html/0049-01.html__7198809989082458472 | f2d_474/html/0049-01.html | BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. | 333 F.2d 84 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining. NLRB v. Scam Instrument Corp., 394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968); McLean v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964); Inland Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir.), cert. de... | OVERRULES | insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining. NLRB v. Scam Instrument Corp., 394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968); McLean v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964); Inland Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 960, 69 S.Ct. 887, 93 L.Ed. 1112 (1948).
Where, as he |
f2d_474/html/0055-01.html__-6549367759127557499 | f2d_474/html/0055-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John MACKEY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James KING, Appellant. | 461 F.2d 92 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: identification procedures.
This precise issue was argued before the Supreme Court on January 10, 1973, in United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 461 F.2d 92 (1972), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909, 92 S.Ct. 2436, 32 L.Ed.2d 682. But that iss... | OVERRULES | identification procedures.
This precise issue was argued before the Supreme Court on January 10, 1973, in United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 461 F.2d 92 (1972), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909, 92 S.Ct. 2436, 32 L.Ed.2d 682. But that issue is not pertinent in the instant case since the use of photographs |
f2d_474/html/0055-01.html__-5050561514179643384 | f2d_474/html/0055-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John MACKEY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James KING, Appellant. | 142 F.2d 805 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ed by either. United States v. Chase, 372 F.2d 453 (4 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 1688, 18 L.Ed.2d 626; Barber v. United States, 142 F.2d 805 (4 Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 741, 64 S.Ct. 1054, 88 L.Ed. 1574.
Mack... | OVERRULES | ed by either. United States v. Chase, 372 F.2d 453 (4 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 1688, 18 L.Ed.2d 626; Barber v. United States, 142 F.2d 805 (4 Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 741, 64 S.Ct. 1054, 88 L.Ed. 1574.
Mackey and King, both black, claim that their constitutional rights were vi |
f2d_474/html/0055-01.html__-4745424164564527081 | f2d_474/html/0055-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John MACKEY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James KING, Appellant. | United States v. Spears | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ce. The case is therefore remanded to the district court for vacating the sentences on two counts once the judgments of conviction have become final. United States v. Spears, 442 F.2d 424 (4 Cir. 1971).
We have carefully considered the addi... | OVERRULES | ce. The case is therefore remanded to the district court for vacating the sentences on two counts once the judgments of conviction have become final. United States v. Spears, 442 F.2d 424 (4 Cir. 1971).
We have carefully considered the additional claims advanced by Mackey and King and have found them to be without mer... |
f2d_474/html/0055-01.html__-7105739310430036582 | f2d_474/html/0055-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John MACKEY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James KING, Appellant. | 406 U.S. 969 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. Ware, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 455 F.2d 1317 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 969, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 669 (1972) (no right to counsel when pictures of a ... | OVERRULES | ), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. Ware, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 455 F.2d 1317 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 969, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 669 (1972) (no right to counsel when pictures of a lineup, at which counsel was present, were used only to refresh witness |
f2d_474/html/0057-01.html__-1048500846618195712 | f2d_474/html/0057-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold F. HABIG and Jerome M. Schroering, Defendants-Appellees. | See also Kaku Nagano v. Brownell | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: terests of society, and works a manifest injustice in the particular case. Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co., 3 F.2d 577, 580 (7th Cir., 1924).
See also Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, 212 F.2d 262 (7th Cir., 1954); Bowles v. Good Luck Glove ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | terests of society, and works a manifest injustice in the particular case. Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co., 3 F.2d 577, 580 (7th Cir., 1924).
See also Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, 212 F.2d 262 (7th Cir., 1954); Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co., 150 F.2d 853 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 794, 66 S.Ct. 484, 90 L.Ed... |
f2d_474/html/0057-01.html__-4879567573637890286 | f2d_474/html/0057-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold F. HABIG and Jerome M. Schroering, Defendants-Appellees. | 88 S.Ct. 2120 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: al protection. Similarly, corporate officers may have fourth amendment rights with respect to corporate records. In Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 20 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1957), a union officer was protected from a warrantless sea... | OVERRULES | al protection. Similarly, corporate officers may have fourth amendment rights with respect to corporate records. In Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 20 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1957), a union officer was protected from a warrantless search of a union office (jointly shared by the officer) from which union r |
f2d_474/html/0057-01.html__7609552995838397715 | f2d_474/html/0057-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold F. HABIG and Jerome M. Schroering, Defendants-Appellees. | Also see United States v. Rosenberg | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: 957), a union officer was protected from a warrantless search of a union office (jointly shared by the officer) from which union records were seized. Also see United States v. Rosenberg, 416 F.2d 680 (7th Cir., 1969).
In the case before us ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | 957), a union officer was protected from a warrantless search of a union office (jointly shared by the officer) from which union records were seized. Also see United States v. Rosenberg, 416 F.2d 680 (7th Cir., 1969).
In the case before us there was no theft of corporate records nor any other form of trespass on corpo... |
f2d_474/html/0057-01.html__2762141954115418900 | f2d_474/html/0057-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold F. HABIG and Jerome M. Schroering, Defendants-Appellees. | Curcio v. United States | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ings when requested to produce corporate records. In such a situation Dickerson does not apply.
In support of their position, the defendants rely on Curcio v. United States, 354 U.S. 118, 77 S.Ct. 1145, 1 L.Ed.2d (1957). That case held that... | OVERRULES | ings when requested to produce corporate records. In such a situation Dickerson does not apply.
In support of their position, the defendants rely on Curcio v. United States, 354 U.S. 118, 77 S.Ct. 1145, 1 L.Ed.2d (1957). That case held that a custodian of a union’s books cannot be compelled by contempt order to reveal... |
f2d_474/html/0063-01.html__3985697750152863244 | f2d_474/html/0063-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. | 364 F.2d 931 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: nnot find that the District Court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to reopen the case for this purpose. United States v. Wade, 364 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1966), Eason v. United States, 281 F.2d 818 (9th Cir. 1960).
We hav... | OVERRULES | nnot find that the District Court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to reopen the case for this purpose. United States v. Wade, 364 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1966), Eason v. United States, 281 F.2d 818 (9th Cir. 1960).
We have considered the remaining contentions of the appellant, including the |
f2d_474/html/0063-01.html__900994827943703954 | f2d_474/html/0063-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. | 76 S.Ct. 102 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: 3), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 1625, 12 L.Ed.2d 498 (1964); Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862, 76 S.Ct. 102, 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955). The appellant asks that this Court decline to follow th... | OVERRULES | 3), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 1625, 12 L.Ed.2d 498 (1964); Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862, 76 S.Ct. 102, 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955). The appellant asks that this Court decline to follow these decisions since there is a strong possibility that a defendant will |
f2d_474/html/0063-01.html__-2821603490163883245 | f2d_474/html/0063-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. | 361 U.S. 817 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ich the defendant was charged and the theories of the defense and the prosecution. United States v. Malfi, 264 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 817, 80 S.Ct. 57, 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959); United States v. Gordon, 242 F.2d 122, 126-... | OVERRULES | ich the defendant was charged and the theories of the defense and the prosecution. United States v. Malfi, 264 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 817, 80 S.Ct. 57, 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959); United States v. Gordon, 242 F.2d 122, 126-127 (3d Cir. 1957).
In addition, the denial of a proffered request whi |
f2d_474/html/0063-01.html__5259594214259539860 | f2d_474/html/0063-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. | 242 F.2d 122 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: secution. United States v. Malfi, 264 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 817, 80 S.Ct. 57, 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959); United States v. Gordon, 242 F.2d 122, 126-127 (3d Cir. 1957).
In addition, the denial of a proffered request which... | OVERRULES | secution. United States v. Malfi, 264 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 817, 80 S.Ct. 57, 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959); United States v. Gordon, 242 F.2d 122, 126-127 (3d Cir. 1957).
In addition, the denial of a proffered request which is in any respect incorrect is not error. United States v. Kelly, 349 |
f2d_474/html/0067-01.html__853932065330284547 | f2d_474/html/0067-01.html | Pedro GONZALES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clifton W. CASSIDY, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees, John Richard Hayes, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants. | Smith v. Alleghany Corp | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: of opting out of the suit that is accorded to class members in a (b) (3) suit. See Research Corp. v. Asgrow Seed Co., 425 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir., 1970); Smith v. Alleghany Corp., 394 F.2d 381 (2nd Cir., 1968); Moore, ¶ 23.60 at 1202. Also, the ... | CITES_POSITIVELY | of opting out of the suit that is accorded to class members in a (b) (3) suit. See Research Corp. v. Asgrow Seed Co., 425 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir., 1970); Smith v. Alleghany Corp., 394 F.2d 381 (2nd Cir., 1968); Moore, ¶ 23.60 at 1202. Also, the mandatory notice requirements of 23(e) (2). do not apply to (b) (1) and (b),(2)... |
f2d_474/html/0067-01.html__-3383450391951435004 | f2d_474/html/0067-01.html | Pedro GONZALES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clifton W. CASSIDY, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees, John Richard Hayes, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants. | Calagaz v. Calhoun | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: class members in (b) (1) and (b) (2) actions must necessarily rely on the representative to protect their interests.
. See, e. g. Calagaz v. Calhoun, 309 F.2d 248 (5th Cir., 1962), in which the court noted that the theory ... | OVERRULES | class members in (b) (1) and (b) (2) actions must necessarily rely on the representative to protect their interests.
. See, e. g. Calagaz v. Calhoun, 309 F.2d 248 (5th Cir., 1962), in which the court noted that the theory of a class action is that all members of the class are before the court in p |
f2d_474/html/0067-01.html__-7747192466962488442 | f2d_474/html/0067-01.html | Pedro GONZALES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clifton W. CASSIDY, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees, John Richard Hayes, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants. | 366 U.S. 683 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: equately represented in the first suit. Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 61 S.Ct. 115, 85 L.Ed. 22 (1942). See Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States, 366 U.S. 683, 691, 81 S.Ct. 1309, 6 L.Ed.2d 604 (1961); Dierks v. Thompson, 414 F.2d 453 (1... | CITES_POSITIVELY | equately represented in the first suit. Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 61 S.Ct. 115, 85 L.Ed. 22 (1942). See Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States, 366 U.S. 683, 691, 81 S.Ct. 1309, 6 L.Ed.2d 604 (1961); Dierks v. Thompson, 414 F.2d 453 (1st Cir., 1969); Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555 (2nd Cir. |
f2d_474/html/0067-01.html__-3823933436749258481 | f2d_474/html/0067-01.html | Pedro GONZALES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clifton W. CASSIDY, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees, John Richard Hayes, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants. | In Mersay v. First Republic Corp | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: w that the class was inadequately represented.
What standards should determine whether Gaytan adequately represented the class in Gaytan v. Cassidy? In Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of America, supra, the trial court was making the 23(a)(4... | OVERRULES | w that the class was inadequately represented.
What standards should determine whether Gaytan adequately represented the class in Gaytan v. Cassidy? In Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of America, supra, the trial court was making the 23(a)(4) determination of whether the named plaintiff would adequately represent the c... |
f2d_474/html/0077-01.html__8278513011552707146 | f2d_474/html/0077-01.html | Agnes GELLERT and Lisa Gellert, d/b/a Danish Import Company, Appellees, v. UNITED AIRLINES, a Delaware corporation, Appellant. | 112 U.S. 331 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: d by the plaintiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491,... | CITES_POSITIVELY | d by the plaintiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148, 57 L.Ed. 314.
The carrier thus argues that the “value” |
f2d_474/html/0077-01.html__4813151965346073261 | f2d_474/html/0077-01.html | Agnes GELLERT and Lisa Gellert, d/b/a Danish Import Company, Appellees, v. UNITED AIRLINES, a Delaware corporation, Appellant. | See Hart v. Pennsylvania R | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ed in part by the value declared by the plaintiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express C... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ed in part by the value declared by the plaintiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148, 57 L.Ed. 314.
The carrier thus a... |
f2d_474/html/0077-01.html__2883683915540609006 | f2d_474/html/0077-01.html | Agnes GELLERT and Lisa Gellert, d/b/a Danish Import Company, Appellees, v. UNITED AIRLINES, a Delaware corporation, Appellant. | 33 S.Ct. 148 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: n would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148, 57 L.Ed. 314.
The carrier thus argues that the “value” of the shipment, as t... | CITES_POSITIVELY | n would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148, 57 L.Ed. 314.
The carrier thus argues that the “value” of the shipment, as to which the declaration limits its liability under Rule 32, includes co |
f2d_474/html/0077-01.html__-6880230077409977198 | f2d_474/html/0077-01.html | Agnes GELLERT and Lisa Gellert, d/b/a Danish Import Company, Appellees, v. UNITED AIRLINES, a Delaware corporation, Appellant. | 5 S.Ct. 151 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: tiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148,... | CITES_POSITIVELY | tiffs, thus if the value declared had been higher, the cost of the risk portion would have been greater. See Hart v. Pennsylvania R.R., 112 U.S. 331, 5 S.Ct. 151, 28 L.Ed. 717, and Adams Express Co. v. Cronin-ger, 226 U.S. 491, 33 S.Ct. 148, 57 L.Ed. 314.
The carrier thus argues that the “value” of the shipme |
f2d_474/html/0081-01.html__2741609440820440833 | f2d_474/html/0081-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA et al., Defendants-Appellants. | Banks v. Muncie Community Schools | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ses, above, where the district courts made specific findings of no such discriminatory practices by the boards. Similarly, the present case is unlike Banks v. Muncie Community Schools, 433 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1970), where the court remarked t... | OVERRULES | ses, above, where the district courts made specific findings of no such discriminatory practices by the boards. Similarly, the present case is unlike Banks v. Muncie Community Schools, 433 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1970), where the court remarked that the record failed to disclose evidence of either racial motivation in board... |
f2d_474/html/0081-01.html__505149507696589825 | f2d_474/html/0081-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA et al., Defendants-Appellants. | See also Littleton v. Berbling | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: nscious parallelism” in antitrust law involves a similar inference of intent from objective factors. See Antitrust Developments, 1955-1968, at 22-24. See also Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389, 408 (7th Cir. 1972).
. The... | CITES_POSITIVELY | nscious parallelism” in antitrust law involves a similar inference of intent from objective factors. See Antitrust Developments, 1955-1968, at 22-24. See also Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389, 408 (7th Cir. 1972).
. The integration of Crispus Attucks High School, the desegregation of faculty appoi... |
f2d_474/html/0081-01.html__-138534336518643324 | f2d_474/html/0081-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA et al., Defendants-Appellants. | 88 S.Ct. 1697 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ng de jure segregation.
In Green v. County Board New Kent County, supra, and Raney v. Board of Education of the Gould School District, 391 U.S. 443, 88 S.Ct. 1697, 20 L.Ed.2d 727 (1968), the Supreme Court, although not holding freedom-of-ch... | OVERRULES | ng de jure segregation.
In Green v. County Board New Kent County, supra, and Raney v. Board of Education of the Gould School District, 391 U.S. 443, 88 S.Ct. 1697, 20 L.Ed.2d 727 (1968), the Supreme Court, although not holding freedom-of-choice plans to be unconstitutional per se, stressed that they were not al |
f2d_474/html/0081-01.html__-4888954974013228155 | f2d_474/html/0081-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA et al., Defendants-Appellants. | It was just such a use of boundary lines to lock in previous segregation which was condemned in United States v. School District | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: the patterns of residential discrimination discussed by the district court does not make the congruency of housing and school boundaries inevitable. It was just such a use of boundary lines to lock in previous segregation which was condemned... | OVERRULES | the patterns of residential discrimination discussed by the district court does not make the congruency of housing and school boundaries inevitable. It was just such a use of boundary lines to lock in previous segregation which was condemned in United States v. School District 151, supra, 404 F.2d at 1132, and United S... |
f2d_474/html/0090-01.html__-4408578046107757814 | f2d_474/html/0090-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Haines WALDRON, Defendant-Appellant. | United States v. Aufden | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: 32 C.F.R. § 1625.2, the State Director’s request nevertheless mandated a reopening under 32 C.F.R. § 1625.3(a). He analogizes his position to that in United States v. Aufdenspring, 439 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1971), United States v. Noonan, 434 F... | OVERRULES | 32 C.F.R. § 1625.2, the State Director’s request nevertheless mandated a reopening under 32 C.F.R. § 1625.3(a). He analogizes his position to that in United States v. Aufdenspring, 439 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1971), United States v. Noonan, 434 F.2d 582 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 981, 91 S.Ct. 1190, 28 L.Ed.2d 3... |
f2d_474/html/0090-01.html__7698693978819922573 | f2d_474/html/0090-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Haines WALDRON, Defendant-Appellant. | 452 F.2d 659 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: and, thus, his conscientious objector claim of January 1969 was timely filed. In support of his position, Wal-dron cites Rodriguez v. United States, 452 F.2d 659 (7th Cir. 1971), and White v. United States, 422 F.2d 1254 (9th Cir. 1970).
In... | OVERRULES | and, thus, his conscientious objector claim of January 1969 was timely filed. In support of his position, Wal-dron cites Rodriguez v. United States, 452 F.2d 659 (7th Cir. 1971), and White v. United States, 422 F.2d 1254 (9th Cir. 1970).
In Rodriguez, the defendant had failed to report for induction because o |
f2d_474/html/0090-01.html__11406536913824275 | f2d_474/html/0090-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Haines WALDRON, Defendant-Appellant. | 434 F.2d 582 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: er 32 C.F.R. § 1625.3(a). He analogizes his position to that in United States v. Aufdenspring, 439 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1971), United States v. Noonan, 434 F.2d 582 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 981, 91 S.Ct. 1190, 28 L.Ed.2d 333 (197... | OVERRULES | er 32 C.F.R. § 1625.3(a). He analogizes his position to that in United States v. Aufdenspring, 439 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1971), United States v. Noonan, 434 F.2d 582 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 981, 91 S.Ct. 1190, 28 L.Ed.2d 333 (1971), and Miller v. United States, 388 F.2d 973 (9th Cir. 1967). Each cas |
f2d_474/html/0090-01.html__3203537119243164567 | f2d_474/html/0090-01.html | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Haines WALDRON, Defendant-Appellant. | 469 F.2d 1356 | What is the relationship between the citing case and the cited case?
Context: ced while his induction is postponed, we note only that it was at Waldron’s request and only for a brief period of time. See United States v. Benson, 469 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir. 1972), where far longer postponements were held not to be prejudici... | CITES_POSITIVELY | ced while his induction is postponed, we note only that it was at Waldron’s request and only for a brief period of time. See United States v. Benson, 469 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir. 1972), where far longer postponements were held not to be prejudicial.
Waldron also urges that the intervention by the State Director effe |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
CAP RLVR Case Relationship Classification Dataset
Determining how cases relate (overrule, distinguish, affirm, etc.)
Dataset Overview
- Task Type: Case Relationship Classification
- Train samples: 5,159,319
- Validation samples: 644,914
- Test samples: 644,914
- Estimated size: 5GB
Task Description
Determining how cases relate (overrule, distinguish, affirm, etc.)
Data Format
Each record contains:
inputs: The question or prompt for the legal reasoning taskoutputs: The expected answer or completion- Additional metadata specific to entail tasks
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load the dataset
dataset = load_dataset("kylebrussell/cap-rlvr-entail")
# Load specific split
train_data = load_dataset("kylebrussell/cap-rlvr-entail", split="train")
# Example usage
for example in train_data.take(1):
print("Input:", example["inputs"])
print("Output:", example["outputs"])
Training Recommendations
- Model: Qwen3-14B or similar legal-focused models
- Task-specific training: Can be used individually or combined with other legal reasoning tasks
- Evaluation: Use test split for final evaluation, validation for hyperparameter tuning
Related Datasets
This is part of the CAP RLVR project. See also:
kylebrussell/cap-rlvr-sft- Unified SFT datasetkylebrussell/cap-rlvr-holding- Holding selection taskskylebrussell/cap-rlvr-bluebook- Citation completion taskskylebrussell/cap-rlvr-summarise- IRAC summarization taskskylebrussell/cap-rlvr-entail- Case relationship classification
Source
Generated from the CAP RLVR project using the Caselaw Access Project corpus.
License
The dataset follows the terms of the original Caselaw Access Project data.
- Downloads last month
- 177