Datasets:
category stringclasses 6
values | category_label stringclasses 6
values | term stringlengths 5 33 | kind stringclasses 4
values | era stringclasses 5
values | position stringclasses 2
values | regex stringclasses 9
values | note stringlengths 0 163 | sources stringlengths 6 32 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | delve | word | 2023-mid2024 | The canonical tell; usage in academic papers spiked ~25x post-ChatGPT. Faded sharply in 2025. | wikipedia_aisigns, alston | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | tapestry | word | 2023-mid2024 | As an abstract noun ('rich tapestry of'). | wikipedia_aisigns, walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | testament | word | 2023-mid2024 | 'a testament to'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | underscore | word | 2023-2026 | Figurative use ('underscores the importance of'). Grok still overuses it as of 2026. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | pivotal | word | 2023-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns, walterwrites | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | crucial | word | 2023-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns, walterwrites | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | vital | word | 2023-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | robust | word | 2023-2026 | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | seamless | word | 2024-2026 | alston, walterwrites | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | leverage | word | 2023-2026 | As a verb meaning 'use'. | walterwrites, alston | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | harness | word | 2023-2026 | As a verb ('harness the power of'). | walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | utilize | word | 2023-2026 | Usually just means 'use'. | walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | streamline | word | 2024-2026 | walterwrites | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | showcase | word | 2024-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | foster | word | 2024-2026 | 'fostering a sense of'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | enhance | word | 2024-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | landscape | word | 2023-2026 | As an abstract noun ('the evolving landscape of'). | wikipedia_aisigns, walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | realm | word | 2023-2026 | 'in the realm of'. | walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | myriad | word | 2023-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | plethora | word | 2023-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | nuanced | word | 2024-2026 | walterwrites | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | intricate | word | 2023-2026 | Also 'intricacies'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | meticulous | word | 2023-2024 | Also 'meticulously'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | vibrant | word | 2023-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | boasts | word | 2023-2024 | Meaning 'has'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | bolster | word | 2023-2026 | Also 'bolstered'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | garner | word | 2023-2024 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | interplay | word | 2023-2026 | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | multifaceted | word | 2023-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | holistic | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | transformative | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | groundbreaking | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | synergy | word | 2023-2026 | Corporate jargon; near-empty of meaning. | alston, walterwrites | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | empower | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | elevate | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | unlock | word | 2024-2026 | 'unlock the potential of'. | alston | ||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | cutting-edge | word | 2024-2026 | alston | |||
vocabulary | Overused vocabulary | paramount | word | 2023-2026 | alston | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | moreover | word | sentence_start | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | furthermore | word | sentence_start | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | additionally | word | sentence_start | Especially flagged when it opens a sentence. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | consequently | word | sentence_start | walterwrites | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | notably | word | sentence_start | walterwrites | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | importantly | word | sentence_start | walterwrites | |||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | in conclusion | phrase | walterwrites, aiphrasefinder | ||||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | in summary | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | in essence | phrase | textsight_how | ||||
transitions | Formulaic transitions / signposting | ultimately | word | sentence_start | textsight_how | |||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | it is important to note that | phrase | walterwrites, kompozy | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | it is worth noting that | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | in today's fast-paced world | phrase | kompozy, walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | in today's digital age | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | in the ever-evolving | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | when it comes to | phrase | aiphrasefinder | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | navigating the landscape | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | navigate the complexities | phrase | kompozy | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | a testament to | phrase | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | plays a pivotal role | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | plays a crucial role | phrase | wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | underscore the importance | phrase | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | the transformative power of | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | seamless integration | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | treasure trove | phrase | walterwrites, aiphrasefinder | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | rich tapestry | phrase | walterwrites, wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | game-changer | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | embark on a journey | phrase | alston | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | let's delve into | phrase | aiphrasefinder | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | based on the information provided | phrase | walterwrites | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | setting the stage for | phrase | wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | left an indelible mark | phrase | wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | stands as a | phrase | Copula-avoidance: 'stands as / serves as' instead of 'is'. | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
phrases | Cliche phrases and stock shells | serves as a | phrase | wikipedia_aisigns | ||||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | rule_of_three | pattern | Overuse of triples: 'adjective, adjective, adjective' or 'phrase, phrase, and phrase' to make shallow analysis look thorough. | wikipedia_aisigns, textsight_how | |||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | negative_parallelism | pattern | \b(not only\b[^.]*\bbut\b|it's not (just )?[^.]*,? (it's|but)) | 'Not only X but Y', 'It's not X, it's Y', 'no X, no Y, just Z'. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | undue_emphasis_on_significance | pattern | Sweeping claims about legacy/importance/broader trends ('reflects broader', 'marking a shift', 'evolving landscape'). | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | vague_attribution | pattern | \b(studies show|experts (say|agree)|research (suggests|indicates|shows)|it is (widely )?(believed|considered)|some (argue|say)|many believe)\b | Unsourced generalization of opinion. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | outline_like_conclusion | pattern | Closings that pivot to 'challenges and future prospects' as a canned wrap-up. | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | inline_header_list | pattern | Bulleted/numbered list where each item starts with a bold header then a colon then description. Very characteristic of chat output. | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
structural | Structural and rhetorical tells | over_hedging | pattern | \b(it depends on your specific needs|there are pros and cons|varies from person to person|both have their (own )?(merits|advantages))\b | Relentless neutrality with no stance. | aifreeforever | ||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | em_dash | pattern | \s\u2014\s|\u2014 | LLMs use em dashes more than nonprofessional human text of the same genre, often spaced ( — ) and in a formulaic, punched-up way. | wikipedia_aisigns, textsight_how | ||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | curly_quotes | pattern | [\u201c\u201d\u2018\u2019] | ChatGPT and DeepSeek default to curly quotes/apostrophes; Gemini and Claude usually do not. Also common in professionally typeset human text, so weak alone. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | overuse_of_boldface | pattern | \*\*[^*]+\*\* | Mechanically bolding every key term in 'key takeaways' style. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | title_case_headings | pattern | Every heading in Title Case, unlike most human sentence-case prose. | wikipedia_aisigns | |||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | emoji_as_formatting | pattern | [\u2705\u274c\u2b50\U0001F300-\U0001FAFF] | Bullet-point emoji (checkmarks, rockets) used as list markers. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
punctuation_format | Punctuation and formatting tells | leftover_ai_markup | pattern | (contentReference|oaicite|oai_citation|turn\d+search\d+|:::writing) | Reference/markup bugs pasted straight from a chatbot. A near-certain tell. | wikipedia_aisigns | ||
statistical | Statistical signals | low_burstiness | metric | Low standard deviation of sentence length across the passage. | leap_pb, vortenza_pb, eyesift_pb | |||
statistical | Statistical signals | low_perplexity | metric | Predictable next-word choices. Cannot be measured without a language model; the checker reports proxies (type-token ratio, sentence-length uniformity) and says so. | kompozy, textsight_how |
ai-writing-markers
A curated, source-backed catalogue of textual markers associated with AI-generated (LLM) writing, plus a small dependency-free Python checker that scans your text for them.
Use it to audit and edit your own drafts, to teach what "AI voice" looks like,
or as a machine-readable dataset (markers.json) for other tools.
This is not an AI detector. These markers are weak signals, not proof of authorship. Independent studies report false-positive rates from roughly 5% to over 60% on genuine human writing, with non-native English speakers and formal academic prose hit hardest (Liang et al., Patterns 2023). Never use these markers, or any tool built on them, as the sole basis for an accusation of misconduct. Treat every result as a prompt for a closer human read.
Why this exists
Most "AI detectors" are opaque and unreliable. The useful, honest thing a tool can do is point at the concrete patterns that make writing read as machine-generated so a human can decide whether to change them. Those patterns are well documented, especially by Wikipedia's WikiProject AI Cleanup, whose Signs of AI writing field guide is the single best public reference on the subject. This repo distills that guide and other 2026 sources into a structured, cited dataset.
What's inside
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
markers.json |
The dataset. 6 categories, 87+ markers, each with notes and source ids. Source of truth. |
markers.jsonl |
Flattened, one-row-per-marker view (powers the HF dataset viewer). Generated from markers.json. |
check.py |
Zero-dependency CLI that scans a file against markers.json. |
SOURCES.md |
Every source, with links. |
data/ |
Human-readable explainers per category. |
CONTRIBUTING.md |
How to add or correct a marker. |
space/ |
Gradio app for a Hugging Face Space (needs PRO to host). |
space-static/ |
Static, client-side Space (free to host) — the deployed one. |
HUGGINGFACE.md |
How to publish as an HF Dataset and Space. |
Marker categories
- Overused vocabulary — words like
delve,tapestry,underscore,pivotal,robust,leverage. Overused sets drift by model era (e.g.delvepeaked in 2023–early 2024 and faded by 2025), somarkers.jsontags each with anera. - Formulaic transitions / signposting —
moreover,furthermore,additionally(especially opening a sentence),in conclusion. - Cliche phrases and stock shells —
it is important to note that,in today's fast-paced world,a testament to,navigating the landscape. - Structural and rhetorical tells — the Rule of Three, negative parallelisms ("not only X but Y"), vague attribution ("studies show"), outline-like "challenges and future prospects" conclusions, bold-header inline lists, relentless hedging.
- Punctuation and formatting tells — spaced em dashes, curly quotes, mechanical
over-bolding, title-case headings, emoji-as-bullets, and leftover chatbot markup
(
contentReference,oaicite,turn0search0). - Statistical signals — low perplexity (predictable word choice) and low burstiness (uniform sentence length), the two metrics classical detectors lean on.
Also on Hugging Face
- Live demo (Space): https://huggingface.co/spaces/humzakt/ai-writing-markers — a browser-only checker; paste text and scan, nothing leaves your machine.
- Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/humzakt/ai-writing-markers — the marker catalogue as a reusable dataset.
The deployed Space is static (client-side JS), because Hugging Face requires a PRO
plan to host Gradio Spaces on the free tier. A Gradio version lives in space/;
the static one is in space-static/. See HUGGINGFACE.md
for publishing steps.
Install
No dependencies. Python 3.8+.
git clone https://github.com/humzakt/ai-writing-markers.git
cd ai-writing-markers
Usage
# Scan a file
python3 check.py essay.md
# Pipe from stdin
cat essay.txt | python3 check.py -
# Machine-readable output
python3 check.py essay.md --json
Example (an intentionally AI-flavoured sentence):
$ echo "In today's fast-paced world, we must delve into the rich tapestry of innovation." | python3 check.py -
Overused vocabulary: 2 hit(s)
- delve: 1
- tapestry: 1
Cliche phrases and stock shells: 2 hit(s)
- in today's fast-paced world: 1
- rich tapestry: 1
Reading the report
- burstiness = standard deviation of sentence length / mean. Human prose is commonly 0.65–0.85; AI prose often falls below 0.30. Raise it by mixing very short sentences (3–8 words) with long ones (35+).
- per-1000-words density matters more than raw counts. A handful of hits in a long document is ordinary human writing; a dense cluster in a short passage is the real signal.
- perplexity cannot be measured here. True perplexity needs a reference language model. The checker reports proxies (type-token ratio, sentence-length uniformity) and says so.
Known limitations
- Best on plain prose. On Markdown, tables and
**bold**labels will legitimately trip the boldface and structural checks, and the naive sentence splitter treats a table as one long "sentence," which skews burstiness. Strip formatting first for the cleanest read. - String matching is literal and case-insensitive; it does not understand meaning, so it cannot judge tone, hedging quality, or factual grounding.
- The dataset reflects English LLM output as of mid-2026 and will age.
How to actually improve a draft
Swapping flagged words for synonyms does not work; synonyms are also high-probability, and it does nothing for burstiness. What works:
- Vary sentence length deliberately, throughout, not in one paragraph.
- Replace generic claims with specific, named detail and examples.
- Cut stock shells and state the point directly.
- Take an actual position instead of hedging both ways.
- Break parallel structures and the Rule of Three.
See each file in data/ for the reasoning and citations behind a category.
License
Code: MIT. Data (markers.json, data/): CC0-1.0 (public domain).
The underlying observations are drawn from public sources credited in
SOURCES.md; Wikipedia content is CC BY-SA.
Contributing
Markers evolve with models. PRs that add, retire, or re-date markers are welcome,
as long as each change cites a source. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
- Downloads last month
- 20