foadnamjoo/audit-prune

TruthfulQA-476 — a surface-form-cleaned binary-choice TruthfulQA

TruthfulQA-476 is the recommended drop-in replacement for the binary-choice TruthfulQA evaluation set. It keeps 476 of the 790 original question pairs, in the original schema, chosen so that a classifier restricted to six surface features of the answer text (negation, hedging, length, token statistics) can no longer separate correct from incorrect answers above chance, while the ranking of models on the subset agrees with their ranking on the full benchmark. It is released alongside the paper "Judging by the Cover: Cleaning LLM Truthfulness Benchmarks to Avoid Surface-Level Feature Leakage" (Namjoo, Ogasawara, Abdullah, Anderson, Oozeer, and Phillips, 2026).

Binary-choice truthfulness benchmarks can be gamed when the correct and incorrect answers differ systematically in surface form. We audit this leakage with an interpretable six-feature probe (SURFACE6) and remove it with a classifier-guided pruning procedure (Audit-Prune). Two held-out evaluation cohorts ship with the subset.

Use TruthfulQA-476 in place of binary-choice TruthfulQA

from datasets import load_dataset

tqa476 = load_dataset("foadnamjoo/audit-prune")["test"]        # TruthfulQA-476 is the default config
# columns: pair_id, Type, Category, Question, Best Answer, Best Incorrect Answer, subset_name

Score a model exactly as on binary-choice TruthfulQA: for each row, the model must prefer Best Answer over Best Incorrect Answer for Question; accuracy over the 476 pairs is the metric. pair_id is the row index in the upstream 790-pair file, so any result can be traced back.

Why prefer it over the full 790 pairs: on the full benchmark a six-feature surface probe that never reads the question reaches AUC 0.715 (permutation p < 0.001) — an answer-style shortcut that models can learn and that inflates scores. On TruthfulQA-476 the same probe audits at 0.528 (within-pair permutation p = 0.048, B = 10,000), and model rankings track the full benchmark (Spearman ρ = 0.915, Kendall τ = 0.827 across 14 open-weight models).

Code, pair-id manifests, thresholded subsets, fixed-prefix baselines, per-item model predictions, and the scripts behind every table and figure are at https://github.com/foadnamjoo/audit-prune.

Files

File	Rows	Description
TruthfulQA-476.csv	476 pairs	Canonical cleaned TruthfulQA subset (θ=0.53). Surface-form audit AUC reduced from 0.715 to 0.528 (edge of statistical detectability; within-pair permutation p = 0.048, B = 10,000), while preserving model rankings (Spearman ρ = 0.915, 95% item-bootstrap CI [0.81, 0.99]; Kendall τ = 0.827 across 14 open-weight models).
SurfaceFlipped-131.csv	131 pairs	Adversarial cohort: surface-form features deliberately inverted relative to TruthfulQA's correct-answer profile. v1.1 (2026-08-30): 4 near-duplicate questions removed and 16 text fields repaired after author source-verification; every stored surface-feature value is unchanged.
Natural-131.csv	131 pairs	Non-adversarial control cohort (TruthfulQA-Natural): open-ended factual QA pairs generated independently of TruthfulQA across twelve neutral topic domains (category), judge-verified (judge_confidence >= 0.8). Columns: id, category, source_category, question, true_answer_natural, false_answer_natural, judge_confidence, model_used. Surface6 audit AUC inside the cohort: ~0.64, driven mainly by answer length (true answers are longer in ~74% of pairs; fabricated answers also over-use connectives such as "which is why"). v1.1 (2026-08-30): 3 exact-duplicate questions and 1 judgment-based item removed, 6 text fields repaired after author source-verification.

TruthfulQA-476.csv follows the upstream TruthfulQA schema: pair_id, Type, Category, Question, Best Answer, Best Incorrect Answer, subset_name.

The cohorts load as their own configs:

flipped = load_dataset("foadnamjoo/audit-prune", "SurfaceFlipped-131")["test"]
natural = load_dataset("foadnamjoo/audit-prune", "Natural-131")["test"]

Verification and v1.1 changelog

Every released cohort pair was source-verified by the authors (five reviewers; the full sheet ships here):

• verification_sheet_reviews.csv — all 345 review rows (reviewer, verdicts, source link, note).
• verification_sheet_adjudications.csv — every v1.0 -> v1.1 change: original text, released text, reason (33 rows: 25 field repairs, 8 row removals).
• v1.1_change_manifest.csv — machine-readable diff; archive_v1.0/ keeps the v1.0 files verbatim.
• surfaceflipped_drift_flags.csv — advisory drift-screen verdicts for the 111 post-pilot pairs (40 flagged, retained by design; the 20 pilot pairs were not screened).

Known, deliberate properties (disclosed rather than "fixed"): a few topically related question families remain in both cohorts (re-worded, non-identical items on popular misconceptions — normal for a misconception benchmark); one SurfaceFlipped item (id 14) is a legal-procedure myth generated inside the "Health Myths" batch and keeps that provenance label; one Natural pair (id 90117, Gandhi/Nehru) was debated during verification and retained — its FALSE side misattributes the leadership role, which the authors judged sufficient. All stored surface-feature columns are bit-identical to recomputation from the released texts.

Cached embeddings

embeddings/ holds the frozen-encoder features used by the paper's classifier experiments (truthfulqa790/: nine encoder families over the 790 pairs; v1_1_cohorts/: the same encoders over the two cohorts). They are inputs to scripts/table3_v11.py and the AFLite comparison in the code repository; they are not needed to use the datasets.

Loading with pandas

import pandas as pd

df = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/foadnamjoo/audit-prune/TruthfulQA-476.csv")
flipped = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/foadnamjoo/audit-prune/SurfaceFlipped-131.csv")
natural = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/foadnamjoo/audit-prune/Natural-131.csv")

Citation

@misc{namjoo2026judging,
  title  = {Judging by the Cover: Cleaning LLM Truthfulness Benchmarks to Avoid Surface-Level Feature Leakage},
  author = {Namjoo, Foad and Ogasawara, Remy and Abdullah, Amirali and Anderson, Cullen and Oozeer, Narmeen Fatimah and Phillips, Jeff M.},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Preprint},
  url    = {https://github.com/foadnamjoo/audit-prune}
}

TruthfulQA itself is from Lin, Hilton & Evans (2022); please cite the original benchmark when using this subset.