Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
large_stringlengths
3
2.54k
complexity_ari
float64
-16.22
180
complexity_coleman_liau
float64
-39.6
210
complexity_flesch_kincaid
float64
-11.28
117
complexity_gunning_fog
float64
0
122
complexity_smog
float64
3.13
50.2
complexity_dale_chall
float64
0
22.7
Well it's just that, you know, a pound, or a hundred pounds today, is not the same as a hundred pounds in a year's time, or two, two years' time.
11.782
3.706667
9.09
12
3.1291
7.229833
So that would be opportunity cost?
4.335
6.333333
6.416667
9.066667
8.841846
6.565767
That's right, yes, that's right, so, in actual fact, this area here, right, is going to be the discounted sum of all future rural incomes.
12.5476
7.144
10.68
14.8
13.023867
8.6661
Alright, now if we look at the, the rural instead of the urban wage rate, right, up here alright, now let's just say that it takes that amount of time before this individual gets a job in the urban area, alright, now if we discount alright the erm, the rural, the urban wages right, that's all this
27.066842
7.084211
22.580351
24.203509
11.208143
11.172998
Why have you just discounted it to there?
2.5875
4.425
2.28
8.2
8.841846
6.00705
Why have you discounted it to W R?
-1.53375
-0.65
5.23
13.2
11.208143
9.95455
Well it's, well, er, there's no need why that should be the case, it could be, you know, it could look something like that.
10.195
4.958333
6.061667
9.6
3.1291
6.142733
But, up in the, there the migrant's decision making process will be, is this area here right, is that area there, greater than that area there.
12.946154
7.823077
11.796154
16.553846
14.554593
9.177254
Alright, so this is the discounted sum in er, in non-agriculture, in the urban area, and this is the value, the discounted sum in agriculture.
13.3012
8.768
13.04
18
15.903189
9.9293
Now, clearly on the, on the way I've drawn this diagram it is.
3.185385
2.446154
4.003077
8.276923
8.841846
7.925146
Right, but that's going to depend on right, not only the wage differential, now if the wage differential is very large it's likely that this discounted sum is going to, you know, be larger than that.
18.026667
8.511111
15.166667
17.733333
13.023867
8.053767
But it also depends on the time it takes to get the job.
1.011538
1.107692
3.095385
5.2
3.1291
6.710531
I mean if we got a job somewhere out here then it clearly wouldn't be.
3.654
3.106667
4.42
6
3.1291
5.433167
So it's this, it's the time taken to get this erm, er, to get the job's going to be important.
6.2325
2.44
6.37
8
8.841846
6.997
Now if we think of W U as being er, the expected value of the urban wage, and that equals the probability of getting a job, multiplied by the actual urban wages, alright then this probability of getting a job is going to be important as well.
21.711702
7.140426
21.569787
23.906383
18.243606
10.671104
And that's it then, scruffy diagram, but what more have we got?
4.98
4.933333
3.84
8.133333
8.841846
6.863367
An urban wage, a rural wage, right, we discount those wages over time, right and that area there, shading the area in the blue sort of box, then this it's erm, it's going to be rational for this er, migrant, this person to become a migrant.
21.536304
6.630435
18.51087
21.008696
13.023867
10.723752
Even though, I mean this doesn't say anything about unemployment levels, levels of unemployment.
13.493571
14.814286
12.627143
11.314286
13.023867
8.842329
Unem the level of unemployment is subsumed between, well, within the time it takes to get a job, and also the probability of, of getting a job.
12.48
7.162963
12.858519
13.762963
11.208143
8.484589
So this sort of, even that's just what the Harrison model erm, tells us, right, so that's, unemployment rates are, are virtually erm, unimportant in the migrant's decision.
16.961071
10.9
13.872857
18.342857
15.903189
11.228514
Unemployment rates now, it's because they may well be, if they're acting rationally, discount over a very large, long period of time.
13.548182
10.536364
11.762727
14.254545
13.023867
9.034064
Okay just er, just to ask, is this erm, migration, it, does it cause a problem?
5.41
3.375
5.4
8.9
8.841846
9.364475
I mean I thought that migration was the er, would be the cure of all ills, in that, you know, we've got wage differentials here in this, in this hypothetical economy.
14.733226
7.380645
12.867742
17.56129
14.554593
8.739584
Surely if you migrate that increases the supply of labour, it reduces the supply of labour in the rural sector, it increases the supply of labour in er, the urban sector, unless wage, wage rates should equalize?
19.347027
9.891892
17.337297
19.124324
14.554593
13.580078
What, what, why don't, why doesn't, why don't wage rates equalize?
8.048182
6.818182
3.718182
8.036364
8.841846
8.488464
Because erm, the urban sector is normally considered to be capital intensive a sector, and the rural area in L D Cs are considered more labour intensive, and so erm, obviously when you get an influx of labour, and changes to the capital to labour ratio
22.765
9.026087
22.102174
25.356522
21.19439
13.469839
erm, and you would see er, a shift in capital to, to agriculture as the return on capital in urban falls,
8.134286
5.161905
9.457143
10.304762
13.023867
9.189529
and this would, you would think, because there's a shift back of capital to agriculture you'd get a rise in agricultural wage rates because that changes the capital to labour ratio again and so this would counteract the movement.
21.136923
11.102564
17.773846
19.702564
17.122413
10.02449
However, there is a problem, capital is not perfectly mobile, like you can apply a new machine into, well maybe you could cos that's .
11.294
8.1
11.47
11.266667
13.023867
8.116483
Whatever, you can't apply the urban type of capital back onto the land, so it's okay to say this would work if capital was completely and perfectly mobile, but it isn't so, you don't get that and you don't get balanced growth of that.
21.015682
7.386364
17.929091
20.327273
15.903189
9.7664
Because er, everything shifts in the wrong direction.
9.6525
12.4
6.705
3.2
11.208143
7.9808
That's right, I mean, in order to eq equalize wages between sector, labour and also capital has to be perfectly mobile.
11.274286
8.752381
11.704762
12.209524
13.023867
9.941433
Now, if it's not, we know that labour isn't, isn't perfectly mobile, it appeared, migration would seem to suggest it's, it's pretty mobile geographically, but it may not be particularly mobile occupationally.
20.622188
13
18.64625
19.05
15.903189
10.651513
So that these people go to the urban areas to get the jobs, they're not trained erm, for these jobs right and as a result, these wages rates still, may still be maintained despite the fact there are lots of people who are quite happy to take wages erm, in, take up jobs in the urban sectors, it's the fact that sort of, ...
35.873919
7.705405
27.94027
31.221622
13.023867
11.574468
Also, where, what are the erm, what're the highest paid jobs in the urban sector?
7.108
6.2
5.993333
6
3.1291
10.6965
They are essentially in developing countries.
12.97
16.966667
12.316667
15.733333
11.208143
11.8291
They are essentially government jobs.
12.156
15.4
9.96
10
11.208143
10.2005
Now, er, without wishing to generalize too much, bribery, corruption, you know, it's not what you know, it's who you know, are very important factors in er, in employment in developing countries.
18.70875
10.825
15.69625
19.05
17.122413
10.158075
And as a result they are
-3.515
-2.366667
0.516667
2.4
3.1291
6.565767
It's much nicer to say patronage, you promise to say patronage.
6.763636
7.872727
6.936364
11.672727
11.208143
8.488464
Ah, patronage, okay, that's er, a nice euphemism to see the
5.050909
4.709091
6.936364
11.672727
11.208143
9.923918
That's right, in that erm, you're, the probability of you getting a well paid job is greatly enhanced, if not guaranteed if you know er, the people who are employing you.
15.340968
7.941935
12.867742
16.270968
13.023867
8.739584
And this sort of thing goes, is, is rife in developing countries.
5.765
6.383333
4.823333
8.133333
8.841846
8.1792
I mean the old boy network is pretty bad in this country, but er, it's similar sorts of things go on in developing countries, and because there's much less of an industrial sector there, the government sector itself, erm, plays a very important role in, in employment.
24.317234
9.731915
20.314468
22.204255
17.122413
11.007062
Now, was it you Lyn who had some statistics some saying er, what proportion
6.428571
6.942857
5.884286
11.314286
11.208143
9.970186
Fine I've got,I've got to use stat statistics to
4.003333
4.755556
2.342222
8.044444
8.841846
9.346233
Well it works, erm, there were some
1.582857
2.342857
-1.06
2.8
3.1291
8.495129
I can't remember if it was you or somebody else, had er, some data as to how many of the er, jobs in urban areas where the government
10.400714
4.271429
11.765714
12.628571
14.554593
8.408871
I put erm, studies by Helen and Tate, nineteen eighty three, found public sector employment averaged forty four percent of non-agricultural employment in twenty L D Cs and in extreme cases were Tanzania and Zambia, were as high as seventy eight and eighty one percent respectively.
25.734348
12.556522
22.615217
23.617391
18.243606
12.440057
And I think he quote those, or they didn't quote them in much, as much detail as I did in the lectures.
7.125455
3.418182
6.399091
8.8
3.1291
7.598609
I'd got these figures down, but I hadn't really got anything against them, he just quickly went through the percentages so yes.
12.263636
9.481818
10.153636
10.618182
11.208143
6.163155
Okay, so
-3.945
-13.2
2.89
0.8
3.1291
11.6307
And developed countries averaged twenty four percent, so it's twice as much as developed countries.
12.76
13.933333
9.14
11.333333
11.208143
10.6965
Right, so given sort of erm, public and semi-public institutions, right, represent a large proportion of the non- agricultural erm, employment opportunities, and as a result, alright, the rates of pay in the, in the civil service, essentially, are going to, going to determine erm, the urban, the urban wage rate.
28.358824
11.596078
23.735294
26.67451
19.287187
12.358257
Now if those, erm, wages in the civil service are set, not through sort of market process, but sort of through institutional er, constraints, you know, it's unlikely there's going to be sort of er, union power erm, in these sorts of jobs, but nevertheless, civil servants tend to do quite well at giving themselves pay i...
29.545789
10.035088
23.408421
25.607018
14.554593
12.004051
Conservative government.
33.735
33.2
26.49
20.8
11.208143
11.6307
and er, and as a result, you know, institutes, the wages in government bodies tend to be quite high, and because gov government bodies represent such a large proportion of er, non- agricultural employment they, they represent a much more sort of, a much more potent influence than they would do in a, in a developed coun...
33.533077
10.335385
27.550769
30.923077
22.076136
11.233115
Erm okay what was the importance of implication of er, Harrison model?
7.7275
9.283333
9.74
14.8
13.023867
13.442533
There was one policy implication.
8.388
10.76
9.96
18
11.208143
10.2005
That, what was it, that erm people still move.
2.956667
3.466667
1.031111
3.6
3.1291
5.837344
Obviously, we that right, people will still move if unemployment's high, but if you try, if the government tries and gets rid of unem urban unemployment, say people have moved because of it, so there's unemployment there to start with because of the reasons we've discussed earlier, so then the government said okay, wel...
70.637338
10.566906
55.853094
59.053237
25.980085
14.733994
And, erm, you won't solve anything.
5.12
4.4
2.483333
2.4
8.841846
9.197433
That's right, so, if you want to try and erm, minimize urban unemployment, right, or it's futile to try and minimize urban unemployment by erm, er, establishing employment er, job creation schemes in urban areas, because that will increase the probability of getting a job if you're a migrant.
26.62
11.057143
22.785306
26.946939
20.267339
12.511798
Right, so there are these government job creation schemes, alright.
10.888
13.14
6.01
8
11.208143
8.8695
Now, because it's typically observed in the Harrison model shows this under certain circumstances to be the case, that, erm, a sort of erm, migration elasticity with respect to income differentials, right, is much greater than the erm,
22.111579
12.268421
18.482632
21.515789
17.122413
11.338668
The rate of unemployment, the level of unemployment
8.475
11.675
9.655
13.2
11.208143
7.9808
That's right, yes, yes, that's right, because erm, there's a gre there's a higher elasticity of migration inelasticity in respect to income differentials than there is to unemployment, any job creation schemes will lead to more migration, rather than, rather than less, so how, how best to get round the problem?
28.266471
11.709804
22.578431
25.890196
18.243606
10.810218
If job creation schemes aren't in urban areas, are the best way to get round them, isn't it, if we can show, quite simply, that job creation schemes lead to more migration, which lead to more unemployment.
18.583243
8.481081
15.423784
20.205405
15.903189
9.312511
The policy's self repeating, what policies might ?
7.38625
13.114286
9.054286
19.942857
13.023867
10.750843
A policy of cross-training,for all areas.
9.83
11.166667
10.35
22.4
13.023867
11.8291
Okay, yeah, so, what might those, what form might those policies take, what might they be?
8.648125
7.3625
4.6625
8.9
8.841846
7.390725
on it .
-12.58
-19
-3.01
0.8
3.1291
0.0992
Where's the population growth highest?
13.098
15.4
7.6
10
8.841846
16.5165
It's at its highest in rural areas, this is what's being done.
4.5875
4.45
5.806667
8.133333
8.841846
8.1792
Erm, population control is always focused out in the rural areas,the most difficult place to do it, because populations are dispersed, er, that's where population growth, right, is the highest.
19.318
13.18
16.17
18.666667
15.903189
11.966833
Any other?
0.765
-7.4
8.79
0.8
3.1291
0.0992
Making incentives to actually raise the wage rates in the, in the rural areas so, sort of to, to increase production or, and through, through farming.
14.214231
9.607692
12.25
16.553846
14.554593
9.784562
To improve their situation,
8.83
10.15
9.57
11.6
8.841846
7.7824
Right, yeah
3.12
-4.5
-3.01
0.8
3.1291
11.6307
improve their wages through farming and perhaps
9.657143
13.942857
5.682857
2.8
3.1291
6.239414
That's right,
7.83
-1.6
-3.01
0.8
3.1291
0.0992
put more infrastructure in so that then the farmers can send their children to school rather than work on the land.
10.377143
8.752381
7.771429
10.304762
8.841846
6.18191
yeah, that's right, what we want to try and do is to improve the erm, the returns to, to agriculture which is the main form of er, sort of income in rural areas.
13.481818
4.745455
12.298182
15.624242
11.208143
9.101179
I mean if you do things like that while improving infrastructure, erm, setting up credit, government credit facilities, er, so, so, so we can lend, we could lend money to small farms.
16.9425
9.19375
13.8525
16.55
14.554593
9.664638
Increase in information about unem unemployment itself, that is a, that is a problem, people have this misapprehensions about the probability of getting a job
16.3156
13.408
16.344
16.4
14.554593
9.2977
You could also erm, start to recognize the benefit of the rural sector, and one reason why they were discriminating, L D Cs tended to want to ignore that and sort of shun it, because it's not sort of a glamorous image they were trying to hope for in the urban sector, and, so, if they did help them, say give them units,...
83.708929
8.880952
66.787143
71.485714
27.36623
16.574717
It's not going to disappear, cos it's quite a large part of urban areas.
5.419286
4.871429
6.727143
11.314286
11.208143
8.842329
They could do that.
-0.59
-1.45
-2.23
1.6
3.1291
0.1984
Yes, we want to try and improve resource allocation in the economy and one way of doing that is not necessarily subsidizing agricultural production, but remove the taxes on agricultural growth.
18.835484
13.180645
18.958065
21.432258
18.243606
10.777003
Alright, and effectively what's, what's happening is that the government sectors in erm, in developing countries are very highly subsidized.
17.0655
16.07
14.04
16
15.903189
11.734
Right, they're overmanned, alright, they have very high wages, alright, er, that is one of the major courses of er, causes of resource mis-allocation, it's this very large, very inefficient government sector.
20.622188
13
16.43375
15.3
13.023867
11.14495
And er, one way to, to get people to stay on the land is to introduce some sort of, what we might call market disciplines, if that wasn't such a dirty word, er, into the government, the government sector where there are clear inefficiencies.
21.765
8.440909
18.197273
20.327273
15.903189
7.972082
Okay, right, erm it's nearly time to go, but before we do, can I just give you some bits and pieces, you, you may well have copies of last year's exam paper, but if you haven't, this is for development and integration of trade er, have a look at those sorts of essays you're being asked to do.
26.734828
5.889655
22.085172
24.57931
11.208143
10.052438
But also, look as those er, those short answers, now it's important that you answer the short answer questions well alright, because it's, it's a lot easier to get good marks on a short answer question, providing you do it well, than it is on a long answer question.
24.024694
8.097959
19.413878
21.232653
13.023867
8.322614
Alright, erm, but most people don't, don't ans don't answer short answer questions very well at all, and that's why they get low, low marks for them.
13.526667
7.377778
9.362222
10.8
3.1291
7.899774
Always re bear in mind, that whenever you do a short answer question, right, you've only got fifteen minutes to do it in.
10.343478
6.617391
9.284348
9.2
8.841846
6.150343
Right, there, there isn't a great deal that you can get in, in fifteen minutes.
6.48
5.426667
4.42
6
3.1291
5.433167
But what, what you must have, right, is a definition of erm, the er, sort of thing that you're asked to write about.
9.319565
4.852174
7.232174
10.93913
8.841846
7.523387
I mean, factor price equalization, intra-industry measuring intra-industry trade, optimal intervention, reciprocal dumping, they're all jargon, bits of jargon effect effectively, so you must, you must have a definition.
24.091034
18.97931
20.133793
24.013793
20.267339
13.242141
Right now, although the determinals in industrial specialization within countries, alright, now although you can't really define that, you might be able to say something about industrial specialization.
22.0075
18.15
18.508571
18.342857
15.903189
11.228514
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

No dataset card yet

Downloads last month
45