category stringlengths 14 36 | products int64 6 792 | with_ingredient_list int64 1 344 | pct_any_added_sugar float64 0.9 100 | pct_sugar_in_top3 float64 0.9 100 | pct_2plus_sugar_names float64 0.9 100 | pct_3plus_sugar_names float64 0 34.3 | max_sugar_names int64 2 5 | with_sugar_value int64 2 103 | median_sugar_g_per_100g float64 0 46.3 | median_sugar_tsp_per_100g float64 0 11.6 | with_salt_value int64 2 105 | median_salt_g_per_100g float64 0 2.5 | median_salt_pct_of_5g int64 0 50 | with_nova int64 3 435 | pct_nova4 float64 8.8 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biscuits and cookies | 792 | 344 | 93 | 80.2 | 70.1 | 34.3 | 5 | 96 | 25 | 6.2 | 90 | 0.57 | 11 | 365 | 94.2 |
Sauces, ketchup and spreads | 719 | 337 | 66.2 | 55.2 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 3 | 99 | 9 | 2.2 | 93 | 0.34 | 7 | 435 | 46.4 |
Flours, grains and pulses | 623 | 303 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 3 | 56 | 1.54 | 0.4 | 55 | 0.06 | 1 | 302 | 13.2 |
Chocolate and confectionery | 496 | 236 | 86 | 77.1 | 34.3 | 14.8 | 4 | 82 | 46.33 | 11.6 | 77 | 0.24 | 5 | 235 | 92.8 |
Spices and masalas | 446 | 199 | 12.1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 2.15 | 0.5 | 24 | 1.62 | 32 | 203 | 17.2 |
Dairy (milk, paneer, cheese) | 393 | 221 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 3 | 61 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 62 | 0.13 | 3 | 239 | 25.9 |
Cakes and bakery | 333 | 166 | 86.1 | 50 | 10.8 | 0.6 | 3 | 38 | 3.81 | 1 | 36 | 1.07 | 21 | 169 | 76.3 |
Chips and crisps | 308 | 163 | 65.6 | 16 | 11.7 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 58 | 1.69 | 34 | 165 | 71.5 |
Tea and coffee | 273 | 66 | 16.7 | 13.6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 25.3 |
Breakfast cereals and muesli | 256 | 150 | 64 | 33.3 | 36 | 19.3 | 5 | 56 | 9.88 | 2.5 | 54 | 0.25 | 5 | 148 | 56.8 |
Instant noodles and pasta | 251 | 116 | 67.2 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 0 | 2 | 49 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 43 | 2.5 | 50 | 131 | 87 |
Soft drinks and energy drinks | 241 | 130 | 74.6 | 73.1 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 60 | 10.55 | 2.6 | 57 | 0.02 | 0 | 141 | 93.6 |
Edible oils and ghee | 235 | 107 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 205 | 8.8 |
Milk drinks and health drink powders | 193 | 112 | 52.7 | 51.8 | 11.6 | 4.5 | 4 | 23 | 16.11 | 4 | 24 | 0.14 | 3 | 105 | 60 |
Yoghurt and curd | 190 | 111 | 30.6 | 23.4 | 5.4 | 0 | 2 | 103 | 5 | 1.2 | 105 | 0.12 | 2 | 92 | 48.9 |
Ice cream and frozen desserts | 178 | 106 | 86.8 | 70.8 | 43.4 | 12.3 | 4 | 25 | 22.5 | 5.6 | 23 | 0.12 | 2 | 104 | 95.2 |
Namkeen and savoury snacks | 173 | 105 | 52.4 | 9.5 | 6.7 | 1.9 | 4 | 30 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 25 | 1.42 | 28 | 101 | 47.5 |
Fruit juices and juice drinks | 152 | 91 | 84.6 | 82.4 | 29.7 | 4.4 | 3 | 25 | 11.84 | 3 | 22 | 0.05 | 1 | 91 | 84.6 |
Ready meals and instant mixes | 78 | 27 | 66.7 | 37 | 18.5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 17 | 1.2 | 24 | 32 | 78.1 |
Protein and snack bars | 6 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 27.3 | 6.8 | 2 | 0.65 | 13 | 3 | 100 |
India Label Index
This dataset is a collection of category-level tables from a study of Indian packaged food labels on Open Food Facts. It includes counts of added sugars, fats, warnings, and other nutritional data. The data is useful for analyzing food labeling trends and nutritional content in India.
- Full study with charts: https://devnarsinghani22.github.io/india-label-index/
- Code that rebuilds every file: https://github.com/devnarsinghani22/india-label-index
- DOI (all versions): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23245061
- Author: Dev Narsinghani, https://devnarsinghani22.github.io/
- Licence: ODbL 1.0. Source data: Open Food Facts contributors, https://world.openfoodfacts.org/ (ODbL).
What is inside
The dataset contains 13 files derived from the India Label Index, compiled using Open Food Facts products available in India. These include category-level tables such as category_table.csv and results.json, which provide data on added sugar, sugar in the first three ingredients, salt, and NOVA 4 share by category, based on 3,798 non-staple ingredient lists. Additional files like warnings.json and fssai.json detail Chile’s 2019 warning-label rule and FSSAI’s proposed rule applied to Indian foods. Files such as fats.json, world.json, sugar_world.json, names.json, and diwali.json offer insights into fat types, international comparisons, naming conventions, and festive food products. Each share is recorded with its count (k) and base (n).
Findings
- 60% of 3,798 Indian non-staple ingredient lists name an added sugar; 42% have a sugar in the first 3 ingredients; 19% list 2 or more sugar names (biscuits 70%); 68% are ultra-processed (NOVA 4).
- Instant noodles: median 2.5 g salt per 100 g.
- Under Chile's warning rule, 69% of 687 Indian foods get at least 1 warning and 53% get 2 or more; biscuits 98%, chocolate 96%, chips 94%.
- Under FSSAI's proposed rule (any 1 nutrient high), 71% of 665 non-staple foods would carry a warning; under the dropped 2-nutrient plan, 41%. Soft drinks: 69% under the current plan, 3% under the dropped plan.
- 52% of 2,015 lists naming a fat name palm oil; instant noodles 90%, biscuits 82%, chips 77%, namkeen 66%. 15% name a hydrogenated or interesterified fat.
- Indian chips: 78% (124 of 159) list palm oil, against 3.3% (46 of 1,380) in the UK and 7.6% (211 of 2,779) in the US.
- Biscuits with 5 or more additives: 45% (158 of 350) in India, the most of 12 countries.
- Grain-word packs: 21 of 27 warned under FSSAI's proposed rule, against 403 of 482 plain packs.
Method
The data comes from the Open Food Facts CSV export, with rows tagged as sold in India (pulled 1 October 2026). A 16-country pull was done on 6 October 2026 for the world files. Baby food and supplements were left out. Staples were left out of the India base. Sugar names were counted using an alias list (sugar, invert syrup, glucose syrup, jaggery, dextrose, maltodextrin, etc.). Fats were counted using a matcher for palm, named plant oils, dairy fats, and hydrogenated fats. Warnings were applied by checking each rule's per 100g or per 100ml limits against the label's declared values, counting a nutrient only when it was added. Every number is rounded once from k and n. Scripts in the GitHub repo rebuild every file.
Caveats
- The lists come from Open Food Facts, entered by volunteers; they are not a random sample of Indian shops, so the shares describe this collection, not the market.
- FSSAI's warning label is a proposal; the Supreme Court has not ruled on it.
- The fat count is an upper estimate.
- No brands are named; the files cannot be used to rank or name a brand.
- Where k is small, read the shares as rough.
- Ingredient text was matched by pattern, so a misspelt or missing list is not counted.
Citation
Ask readers to cite the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23245061 and to credit Open Food Facts (ODbL).
Narsinghani, D. (2026). India Label Index: category-level study of Indian packaged-food labels from Open Food Facts. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23245061
- Downloads last month
- 75