midterms stringclasses 2
values | low int64 13 33 | high int64 16 38 |
|---|---|---|
Most House midterms | 13 | 16 |
2022 | 33 | 38 |
Early-Vote Tracker Methods: Bias & Checks
Reference tables on how early-vote trackers are built: county-lean estimates understated Democratic margins by a median 16 points, and bellwether counties barely exist in midterms.
Published by Carmena’s Overton & Electoral Research, an independent, non-partisan US election research firm. These are the public tables behind our charts. Party means voter registration, not vote choice, unless a column says otherwise. Figures are compared at the same number of days before Election Day in each year.
Files
- chart-county-bias.csv (8 rows): How far the county method understated the Democratic early-vote margin. Columns:
stateState;biasBias of county method (points). Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-county-bias - chart-bellwethers.csv (2 rows): Share of counties that moved with the nation, within 4 points. Columns:
midtermsMidterms;lowLow (%);highHigh (%). Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-bellwethers - chart-voterfile-access.csv (7 rows): Where voter files are free, with no account or form. Columns:
placePlace;accessAccess. Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-voterfile-access - chart-oh-agree.csv (3 rows): Ohio early voters: state file against the tracker. Columns:
partyParty;stateFileState file;trackerTracker. Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-oh-agree - chart-tx-records.csv (3 rows): Texas early voters: state records against the tracker. Columns:
partyParty;stateRecordsState records;trackerTracker. Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-tx-records - chart-tx-new-voters.csv (3 rows): Texas 2026 early voters by vote history and party. Columns:
historyVote history;democratsDemocrats (%);republicansRepublicans (%). Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-tx-new-voters - chart-new-voters-swing.csv (5 rows): Correlation of county new-voter share with the presidential swing. Columns:
groupGroup;yearYear;rCorrelation (r). Source page: https://carmenaresearch.com/data/#chart-new-voters-swing
Provenance and method
Carmena’s Overton compiles cumulative early-ballot counts from state and county election records and joins them to voter registration and vote history. Calculations are ours; the method is described on our methodology page. Last updated 2026-10-23. Updated as our tracking runs, typically weekly during the early-voting period.
Caveats
- Tested only in the 8 states where party is known from records.
- A perfect past record adds 0–4 points of predictive edge.
- Cheapest paid files: Pennsylvania about $20, Alaska about $21.
- The two sources agree on the margin and disagree on independents.
- Adding 2022 and 2024 primaries in 4 counties (25% of votes) moved the margin about 0.6 pt. The tracker read D 49, R 42, Other 9 (D+7) on Oct 22.
- Nationally, 80% of early voters voted in both 2022 and 2024. “New” = voted in neither 2022 nor 2024.
- Correlation across counties, not a measure of individual voters. In 2024 the correlation was about zero.
Also on
- GitHub: election-data/early-vote-tracker-methods
- Kaggle: Early-Vote Tracker Methods: Bias & Checks
- Our data page: carmenaresearch.com/data
Licence and citation
CC BY 4.0. Credit “Carmena’s Overton & Electoral Research” and link to the file or page you used. Citation: Carmena’s Overton & Electoral Research. “Early-Vote Tracker Methods: Bias & Checks” (CSV). Last updated 2026-10-23. https://carmenaresearch.com/data/. Licensed CC BY 4.0.
More public data, with JSON copies and a changelog, is on our data page. In-depth data and custom research are available for commercial use on request. New analysis goes out by email first: subscribe.
- Downloads last month
- 55