Hugging Face
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Buckets
new
Docs
Enterprise
Pricing
Website
Tasks
HuggingChat
Collections
Languages
Organizations
Community
Blog
Posts
Daily Papers
Hardware
Learn
Discord
Forum
GitHub
Solutions
Team & Enterprise
Hugging Face PRO
Enterprise Support
Inference Providers
Inference Endpoints
Storage Buckets
Log In
Sign Up
Datasets:
bsenst
/
hearts-reproduction-traces
Like
0
Traces
Modalities:
Tabular
Text
Formats:
json
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
agent-traces
traces
trackio
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
Polars
+ 1
Dataset card
Data Studio
Files
Files and versions
xet
Community
Pi traces preview
Sat, Jul 25
# First, read the challenge instructions: curl -sL https://huggingface.co/datasets/ICML-2026-agent-repro/challenge/resolve/main/README.md Your job is to reproduce the ICML 2026 paper #12789 — HEARTS: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning on Health Time Series (OpenReview id: qj4EnIvNU4). Here are the major claims that you should verify: - Claim 1: HEARTS integrates 16 real-world datasets spanning 12 health domains and 20 distinct signal modalities, with temporal lengths ranging from 60 to over 1 million steps and sampling frequencies from daily to 48kHz. - Claim 2: HEARTS organizes 110 tasks into four hierarchical reasoning categories: Perception (10 tasks), Inference (32 tasks), Generation (34 tasks), and Deduction (34 tasks). - Claim 3: Across 14 state-of-the-art LLMs evaluated on more than 20,226 test cases using the CodeAct framework, evaluated LLMs substantially underperform specialized models, with specialized models concentrated in a high-performance regime while LLMs are shifted substantially lower. - Claim 4: LLM performance on HEARTS correlates only weakly with general reasoning benchmark scores, indicating domain-specific health time-series reasoning skill is not explained by raw model capability. - Claim 5: LLMs predominantly rely on simple heuristics such as copy-pasting with noise, linear interpolation, and statistical averaging rather than genuine multi-step temporal reasoning, with performance degrading further as input sequence length and sampling frequency increase. Logbook structure (fixed order): - Index: title + Pages table only - Executive summary: pinned summary + Scope & cost table + pinned Chenruishuo/posterly poster (`poster_embed.html`) - Claim 1 … Claim N: one page per claim - Conclusion: overall findings and reproducibility notes Try to verify the claims as much as you can locally or using Hugging Face Jobs. Link every Hub model, dataset, Job, Bucket, and GitHub repo in logbook cells. # Last step — validate, then publish: curl -sL https://huggingface.co/spaces/ICML-2026-agent-repro/challenge/raw/main/scripts/validate_icml_logbook.py | python3 - --space /repro-hearts-benchmarking-llm-reasoning-on-health-time-series && trackio logbook publish /repro-hearts-benchmarking-llm-reasoning-on-health-time-series Print the published logbook link here when done.
4 messages
·
166 tools
Agent traces
Agent sessions published from a Trackio Logbook.
Copy to bucket
new
Use this dataset
Downloads last month
36
Number of rows:
1
Total file size:
612 kB