# EDGAR Filing Document

**Accession Number:** 0000037996
**File Stem:** 0000037996-26-000122
**Filing Date:** 2026-5
**Character Count:** 51003
**Document Hash:** 40b25165f01d8d6b404a0f2b6127b97e
**Contains OCR:** False
**Source Format:** 

## Filing Content

## Filing Summary
**0000037996-26-000122.hdr.sgml**: 20260529

**ACCESSION NUMBER**: 0000037996-26-000122

**CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE**: SD

**PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT**: 2

**FILED AS OF DATE**: 20260529

**DATE AS OF CHANGE**: 20260529

**FILER**: 

**COMPANY DATA:**
- **COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:** FORD MOTOR CO
- **CENTRAL INDEX KEY:** 0000037996
- **STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION:** MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES [3711]
- **ORGANIZATION NAME:** 04 Manufacturing
- **EIN:** 380549190
- **STATE OF INCORPORATION:** DE
- **FISCAL YEAR END:** 1231

**FILING VALUES:**
- **FORM TYPE:** SD
- **SEC ACT:** 1934 Act
- **SEC FILE NUMBER:** 001-03950
- **FILM NUMBER:** 261045058

**BUSINESS ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE AMERICAN ROAD
- **CITY:** DEARBORN
- **STATE:** MI
- **ZIP:** 48126
- **BUSINESS PHONE:** 3133223000

**MAIL ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE AMERICAN RD
- **CITY:** DEARBORN
- **STATE:** MI
- **ZIP:** 48126

**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D. C. 20549**

**FORM SD**

**Specialized Disclosure Report**

**<u>FORD MOTOR COMPANY</u>**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<u>Delaware</u>

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

<u>1-3950</u>

(Commission File Number)

<u>One American Road, Dearborn, Michigan</u> <u>48126</u> <br> (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

<u>Deb Heed - (313) 322</u><u>-</u><u>3000</u>

(Name and telephone number of the person to contact in connection with this report)

Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:

[X] Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2025.

[ ] Rule 13q-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13q-1) for the fiscal year ended ________.

------

**<u>Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure</u>**

**Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report**

**Item 1.02 Exhibit\***

A copy of our Conflict Minerals Report is filed as Exhibit 1.01 and is publicly available at <u>https://corporate.ford.com</u>.

**<u>Section 2 - Resource Extraction Issuer Disclosure</u>**

**Item 2.01 Resource Extraction Issuer Disclosure and Report**

Not applicable.

**<u>Section 3 - Exhibits</u>**

**Item 3.01 Exhibits**

---

| | | |
|:---|:---|:---|
| <u>Designation</u> | <u>Description</u> | <u>Method of Filing</u> |
| <u>[Exhibit 1.01](ex1012025.htm)</u> | Conflict Minerals Report\* | Filed with this report |

---

**<u>SIGNATURE</u>**

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

---

| | | |
|:---|:---|:---|
| | | <u>FORD MOTOR COMPANY</u> |
| | | (Registrant) |
| Date: May 29, 2026 | By: | <u>/s/ Liz Door</u> |
|  |  | Liz Door |
|  |  | Chief Supply Chain Officer |

---

\* Any reference in this Report or the attached exhibit(s) to our corporate website(s) and/or other social media sites or platforms, and the contents thereof, is provided for convenience only; such websites or platforms and the contents thereof are not incorporated by reference into this Report nor deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

## Exhibit 1.01

**Exhibit 1.01**

**Ford Motor Company**

**Conflict Minerals Report**

**For The Year Ended December 31, 2025**<sup>1</sup> Ford Motor Company is a global company based in Dearborn, Michigan. Our global value chain is extensive and complex. Driven by a desire to build a better world where every person is free to move and pursue their dreams, we strive for the materials that power our vehicles to be safe, sourced responsibly, and to respect the fundamental human rights of all. To achieve this, we maintain a deep focus on understanding the journey of every material—from its origin to our assembly lines.

We believe in using our purchasing power as a force for good. Where possible, we leverage our scale to enable responsible sourcing that strengthens communities and protects the planet we all share. Guided by our *<u>We Are Committed to Protecting Human Rights and the Environment</u>* policy and our *<u>Supplier Code of Conduct</u>*, we integrate our values into every partnership, promoting our high standards for human rights to be cascaded throughout our entire supply base.

Transparency is the foundation of our approach to working better together. We collaborate closely with our suppliers to gain visibility into our value chain, launching investigations when necessary to ensure our partners meet or exceed Ford's expectations.

Because sustainability is a long-term strategy built on collaboration, we recognize that we cannot do this work alone. We actively partner with industry peers through organizations such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), and the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA). By sharing best practices and aligning our approach, we work to identify and immediately address human rights issues in our supply chain.

We are dedicated to building the capacity of our partners to drive progress. We provide comprehensive training and engage in direct, annual dialogue with our top suppliers to advance our shared sustainability goals. In 2025, we collaborated with over 1,600 supplier representatives on critical topics—including anti-corruption, fair labor, and environmental protection practices.

In this report, "Ford," the "Company," "we," "our," "us," or similar references mean Ford Motor Company, our consolidated subsidiaries, and our consolidated variable interest entities of which we are the primary beneficiary, unless the context requires otherwise.

**1. Overview**

Since 2013, public companies in the United States have been required to conduct due diligence to determine the origin of conflict minerals in their products and to report annually with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The disclosure rules are intended to further the humanitarian goal of ending violent conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries – Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia – collectively referred to as the "Covered Countries." The rules consider **tin, tungsten, tantalum,** and **gold** to be "conflict minerals" regardless of where they are sourced. We use the term "3TG" when discussing these minerals. By increasing the transparency of 3TG sources, the expectation is that funds from the mineral trade will not directly or indirectly benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries. Instead, these funds will be redirected to responsible sources of 3TG both in the Covered Countries and other conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRAs).

Ford utilizes the RMI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) to support our annual due diligence in alignment with the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from CAHRAs. We identify potential 3TG smelters and refiners in our supply chain, conduct additional due diligence, and conduct outreach as members of the Smelter Engagement Teams of both RMI and the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) to encourage them to participate in the RMI Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP).

<sup>1</sup> This report includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, forecasts, and assumptions by our management and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated. For a discussion of these risks, uncertainties, and other factors, please see "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as updated by subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

We prioritize supply chain due diligence based on vehicle content and known environmental and social risks of raw material sourcing as identified on <u>Material Insights</u>, a collaborative platform from TDi Sustainability and the RMI. The following are highlights from the platform regarding risks associated with 3TG:

Tin is used throughout our vehicles, including in electronics, solder, as an alloy with other metals, or as an oxidation-resistant metal coating material. Many sustainability risks are associated with the artisanal and small-scale mining of tin in the Democratic Republic of Congo (9% of global production), including violence and conflict, corruption, pollution, community rights violations, and child labor.

Tantalum is largely used in vehicle electronics. Within the Democratic Republic of Congo, artisanally mined tantalum accounts for the largest share of tantalum production in the world (39%). Sustainability risks associated with tantalum are similar to those associated with tin.

Tungsten is primarily used in vehicle braking systems, engine parts, turbocharger blades, and electrical contacts for electrified vehicles. While most of the global supply of tungsten is produced in China (80%), a small percentage is artisanally mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where there are risks including child labor, human rights abuses, and conflict. However, the share of tungsten supply that is associated with these risks is relatively low.

Gold is used in vehicle electronics. It is strongly associated with many sustainability risks, including pollution, community rights violations, violence and conflict, labor rights, child labor, corruption, and non-payment of taxes. Gold's ability to move easily in small, high-value amounts makes it far harder to trace than other 3TG minerals. These traceability gaps create significant challenges for downstream users trying to ensure their supply chains are free from gold linked to CAHRA risks.

In aggregate, our in-scope suppliers represent a significant percentage of our direct expenditure on components or parts. Through our analysis, we can confirm that more than 43,000 parts in our vehicles contain some level of 3TG content. Of our in-scope parts, 99% contain tin, 22% contain tungsten, 8% contain tantalum, and 56% contain gold, with many parts containing more than one of the 3TG materials. All our vehicles include components containing at least one 3TG material.

While we do not directly source any of the 3TG in our products, we work to enable the 3TG used in our vehicles to be responsibly sourced. We define a responsible source of 3TG as a smelter or refiner that provides 3TG material and has been validated as conformant to (i.e., successfully completed) or is active in (i.e., currently participating in) a third-party audit of its management systems and sourcing practices according to one of the following schemes: the RMI RMAP, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), Responsible Jewelry Council (RJC), or the Tungsten Industry-Conflict Minerals Council (TI-CMC) chain of custody audit protocols. We expect the use of responsibly sourced 3TG in our supply chain to support the development of a "DRC conflict free" 3TG mineral trade in the Covered Countries.

**2. Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI)**

Since we are layers removed from the smelters and refiners in our supply chain, we rely on our direct suppliers to survey their suppliers who are expected to continue the cascade of reporting requirements until they identify information concerning the origin of the 3TG contained in the products they supply us. In some cases, information provided by our in-scope suppliers may be incomplete or over-inclusive, resulting in missing or additional Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI) data determination. As our in-scope suppliers are often unable to confirm 3TG country of origin information, we conduct due diligence on the country of origin related to reported smelters and refiners. Our RCOI determination is based on the aggregated smelter and refiner data received from our in-scope suppliers and compared to the RMI RCOI database, which includes the origins of 3TG from RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC conformant smelters and refiners.

**RCOI Approach**

To determine our in-scope direct suppliers, we performed a risk-based assessment of all suppliers of components or parts to our plants based on 3TG content as reported through the automotive industry's International Material Data System (IMDS) and expected expenditure. We require these suppliers to complete the CMRT, an industry-leading tool developed by the RMI. Suppliers submit their completed CMRT for analysis through a designated link directly into our third-party online platform.

The CMRT includes a list of suppliers to identify 3TG smelters and refiners that may be in our supply chain. Smelters and refiners procure minerals that are processed into usable metals and are a key chokepoint for due diligence in our complex mineral supply chain. If our suppliers identify smelters or refiners that are not conformant to or active in a

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

third-party responsible mineral sourcing validation program, we ask suppliers to contact reported, non-participating smelters and refiners and encourage them to participate in RMAP or consider alternate sourcing arrangements.

For the 11<sup>th</sup> year in a row, we received responses from 100% of the in-scope suppliers surveyed. When we receive supplier CMRTs, we review them and, if necessary, provide corrective action plans and risk assessments to suppliers for any of the following reasons: incomplete reports, reports inconsistent with information previously reported through IMDS, less than 100% response rates from their sub-suppliers, and/or their CMRT contained smelters or refiners that are not RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC conformant smelters and refiners.

Starting in 2022, we implemented a stricter quality review and standard for CMRT acceptance. If a completed CMRT contains all required information and is consistent with the information submitted in IMDS, we consider it a "quality" response. With the support of our corrective action communications and training, this action led in 2025 to a 100% quality response rate for the third year in a row, supporting a more complete set of 3TG data disclosures and better due diligence from our supply chain.

**3. Design of Due Diligence**

Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, with the 5-step framework in the 3<sup>rd</sup> Edition of the <u>Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk</u> <u>Areas (2016)</u> (OECD Guidance) and the related supplements for 3TG.

**4. Due Diligence Measures Performed**

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**4.1.Establish Strong Company Management Systems**

Our conflict minerals management system includes the following actions:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Established an Executive Steering Team for conflict minerals compliance led by our Chief Supply Chain Officer. The team includes the following members:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Chief Government Affairs Officer

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Chief Policy Officer and General Counsel

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Vice President, Chief Sustainability, Environment & Safety Officer

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Chief Communications Officer

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Vice President, Vehicle Hardware Engineering

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Chief Accounting Officer

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Established a cross-functional working level team to manage conflict minerals compliance. The working level team meets biweekly and holds an annual meeting with the Executive Steering Team to review our conflict minerals compliance status, strategy, continuous improvement objectives, performance to metrics, and legislative updates.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Established *<u>Responsible Materials Sourcing Policy including Conflict Minerals</u>* (RMS Policy) requiring our direct suppliers of components containing 3TG to conduct due diligence to understand the origins of 3TG in their components, source 3TG responsibly (as described in Section 1), and not knowingly provide us with 3TG parts that contribute to conflict.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Established our *<u>Supplier Code of Conduct</u>* (Supplier Code) and integrated within our *<u>Production Purchasing Global Terms and Conditions</u>* as a requirement to conduct business with us, including contractual obligations for conflict minerals reporting requirements.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Integrated key performance indicators, including supplier CMRT survey response rate and quality of responses, into suppliers' Sustainability Scorecard which is utilized as part of our sourcing process.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Established and enforced a process to allow for supplier sourcing hold if conflict mineral compliance requirements were not met.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Utilized standardized tools and templates (e.g., CMRT) to improve efficiency and response rates and increase 3TG smelter and refiner participation in responsible assurance programs.

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Built supply base knowledge capacity by developing training modules and conducting training sessions to enable our suppliers to understand our reporting and due diligence requirements, assisting them in their continuous improvement efforts to increase reporting transparency, and promoting procurement from conformant smelters and refiners.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Executed internal capacity building training for relevant employees outlining our supplier reporting requirements, reporting process, and timeline.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Implemented an external grievance site with suppliers utilizing the Responsible Business Alliance Worker Voice platform to provide external stakeholders (e.g., supply chain employees, community members) with instructions and information on reporting grievances in regard to Ford or any of our suppliers, including information in twenty (20) different languages. External stakeholders may also report grievances by emailing <u>SpeakUp@ford.com</u>.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Actively tracked grievances submitted through the RMI Grievance Mechanism that involve SoR facilities reported by our suppliers to determine if additional actions to mitigate risk would be needed, such as direct outreach and engagement with smelters and refiners or notification to suppliers to conduct additional due diligence regarding reported smelters and refiners in their supply chain.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Actively tracked smelter conformance status to RMAP, RJC, and LBMA standards. If a smelter or refiner status changes from Conformant or Active to Non-Conformant, a red flag is placed in our system and suppliers submitting these facilities in subsequent submissions are requested to remove the refiner from the reported supply chain.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Facilitated the confidential reporting of known or potential violations of the law or of our policies by our employees who can report violations directly to Human Resources or the Compliance, Ethics and Integrity Office as well as the Office of the General Counsel. Violations can also be reported using the SpeakUp reporting mechanism, telephone hotlines, websites, or email, some of which allow for anonymous reporting. A cross-functional committee reviews allegations and oversees any investigations and subsequent corrective or disciplinary actions.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Actively participated in collaborative efforts, such as RMI and AIAG work groups, to stay up to date with regulatory requirements, align with industry and cross industry best practices, and continuously improve our conflict mineral due diligence management system.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**4.2.Identify and Assess Risk in the Supply Chain**

We have dedicated resources and a cross-functional team managing our conflict mineral compliance and responsible sourcing efforts to identify, assess, and mitigate risk in our 3TG supply chain. We reviewed in-scope supplier CMRTs for supplier compliance with our reporting requirements such as:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Completion of all required reporting elements

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Manual review and reconciliation of any CMRT reporting inconsistencies

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Consistency between the expected 3TG metals reported as being intentionally added to the supplier's products and the metals reported in IMDS

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Presence of a smelter and refiner list that includes expected metals based on IMDS reporting

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Suppliers' sub-tier response rate reported from each CMRT supplier survey

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Identification of smelters and refiners not participating in required third-party validation programs reported in suppliers' supply chains

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Supplier conflict mineral sourcing policies

We then conduct training sessions on how various recommended corrective actions can be addressed and implemented within the supply chain. Corrective action plans resulted in 124 or 21% of suppliers improving disclosure data on their CMRT upon final re-submission. CMRT improvements included submission upgrades from company level to product level reporting (specific to Ford parts), identifying smelters or refiners not previously disclosed, increasing sub-supplier response rates, cross-checking the RMI smelter database for conformant smelter or refiner audit status, and completing due diligence accordingly. Quality responses provide more accurate data on which we can conduct our RCOI.

We reviewed our suppliers' CMRT smelter lists to identify and assess supplier risk of reported 3TG sourcing that may not comply with our RMS Policy and OECD Guidance to use independent third-party risk-based approach

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

audits, such as RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC, to confirm that smelters and refiners have carried out all five steps of the OECD Guidance framework. This process of identification and assessment includes the following:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Compare suppliers' smelter and refiner lists to the RMI smelter database

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Determine audit status of listed smelters and refiners

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Utilize RMI database smelter and refiner risk scores to assess potential risks in our supply chain

In addition to analysis of supplier responses, we actively review available information related to raw material supply chains, such as publicly available incident reports, NGO reports, and government published information to help us assess risk of identified smelters and refiners in the supply base.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**4.3.Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Identified Risk**

We have established and utilized the following process to respond to identified risks in the supply base:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Follow an escalation process to notify the Chief Supply Chain Officer of risks when identified

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Follow a procedure for risk mitigation including monitoring, tracking, and reporting progress to the Chief Supply Chain Officer

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Analyze supplier CMRT data to create tailored corrective actions to aid suppliers in improving the quality of their reports and better mitigate identified risks

As part of our risk mitigation process, smelters and refiners reported by our suppliers that are not currently identified in the RMI database were reported to RMI for validation and assessment. Per our RMS Policy, we require suppliers to use smelters and refiners conformant to a third-party responsible mineral sourcing validation program like RMAP. If their CMRT included smelters or refiners not identified on the RMI public "Conformant" or "Active" on the RMAP list, we promptly notified those suppliers and provided a report identifying the non-participating entity and a corrective action plan, including additional information gathering and/or due diligence based on external risk indicators. Notifications included the following instructions to promote responsibly sourced 3TG and compliance with our requirements:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Contact sub-suppliers and communicate Ford's requirement to use RMI Active/Conformant smelters and refiners

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Encourage sub-suppliers to also cascade requirements to use Active/Conformant smelters and refiners

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Directly contact smelters and refiners to become conformant to RMAP, and if smelters and refiners refuse, consider alternate sourcing arrangements

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▪ Complete additional due diligence to confirm the source of and determine risk for 3TG supplied by smelters and refiners.

Examples of additional due diligence include researching supply chains with non-participating smelters and refiners, confirming with direct suppliers which smelters and refiners are in our supply chain, and leveraging supply chain purchasing power to improve responsible sourcing.

We participate in cross-industry forums to prevent and mitigate supply chain risks. We are an active member of the RMI and AIAG Smelter Engagement Teams (SETs) to directly contact smelters and refiners to request their participation in RMAP or that they submit appropriate documentation to RMI for cross-recognition and inclusion in the "conformant/active" lists. We co-chair the AIAG SET on behalf of the North American automotive industry, which encourages responsible sourcing by completing coordinated smelter and refiner outreach and funding workgroup member pre-audit visits. We also contribute to the RMI Smelter Assessment Fund which covers the initial assessments for new RMAP auditees, financial assistance for participating auditees, and the publication of assessment results on RMI's website. As members of both AIAG and RMI, we work to amplify the efforts of both SET teams by communicating and coordinating efforts.

We are also a member of Drive Sustainability, a group facilitated by CSR Europe, consisting of eighteen (18) automotive manufacturers who collaborate to enhance sustainability in their supply chains. Drive Sustainability aims to improve the social, ethical, and environmental performance of automotive supply chains, including the responsible sourcing of raw materials.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**4.4.Conduct Independent Third-Party Audit of Smelter and Refiner Due Diligence Practices**

Due to our position in the supply chain, we utilize RMAP and the RMAP Cross-Recognition Program to determine if smelters and refiners reported by our suppliers are conformant with RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

CMC third-party audit protocols to validate responsible sourcing. These audit standards have been developed to assess if companies have management systems in place to support and implement due diligence and responsible sourcing practices. As noted in section 4.3, we are an active member of the RMI SET, and we contribute to the development of RMI tools and processes used to support our program. Additionally, we have visited smelters and refiners to support RMAP assessment participation, and we conduct direct outreach to smelters and refiners to aid in collective uptake of responsible sourcing practices at 3TG smelters and refiners. We use the RMI Facility Database and RCOI information as key inputs to help us manage risk in our supply chain.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**4.5.Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence**

This is our 13<sup>th</sup> Conflict Minerals Report (CMR), and we plan to continue reporting annually. Our CMR is available on our corporate website at <u>https://corporate.ford.com</u>. We publish our supplier response rate and our smelter conformance rates by mineral in our <u>Integrated Sustainability and Financial Report</u> performance data. Our smelter and refiner list is available on our corporate Sustainability > <u>Additional Downloads</u> page.

**5. Facilities Used to Process the Conflict Minerals in Products, if Known**

We have surveyed our in-scope suppliers to identify the facilities used to process the 3TG contained in our products. Over half of our in-scope suppliers (58%) provided a company-level CMRT that does not identify the smelters or refiners used for a particular part, component, or business customer. In cases where suppliers provided a product-level report, the identification of the smelters and refiners that support our specific products could not be determined due to sub-tier suppliers reporting on a company basis. Therefore, we are unable to identify with certainty the specific facilities used to process the 3TG in our products and whether the 3TG in our products is from recycled/scrap sources. We request product-level reporting in certain cases and have enhanced our 3TG training to demonstrate how product-level reporting is a necessary step to reduce risk in our supply chain.

By comparing our in-scope suppliers' smelter and refiner lists to the RMI Smelter Database, we determined that 332 RMI eligible 3TG smelters and refiners were reported by our in-scope suppliers. Overall, 65% of the 332 smelters and refiners are considered "responsible sources of 3TG." Our conformance rate remained the same from last year. We identified 10 new smelters and refiners, 7 of which are conformant/active and 3 are non-conformant. Overall, we identified 2 additional tin smelters and 5 tungsten smelters conformant or active to RMAP from the prior year reporting period.

We monitor the performance of our risk prevention measures through our key performance metrics. We track supplier response rates and the quality of the data in CMRT submissions and escalate non-complying suppliers within operations. In 2025, we achieved a 100% response rate for the 11<sup>th</sup> year in a row and a 100% quality rating for the third year in a row.

The table below depicts, by mineral, the percentage of smelters and refiners potentially in our supply chain that are Conformant or Active participants in the RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC audit protocol:

**Table 1. Smelter and Refiner Status**

---

| | | | | |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Smelter or Refiner**<br>**RMI RMAP Status** | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**Tin** | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**Tantalum** | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**Tungsten** | **Gold** |
| &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Conformant % | 68% | 91% | 65% | 54% |
| &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Active % | 5% | 3% | 2% | 2% |

---

**6. Country of Origin of the Conflict Minerals in Products, if Known**

Through our leadership efforts as well as our due diligence actions, we have increased transparency within our supply chain. In 2014, 41% of our in-scope suppliers provided a smelter and refiner list. In 2025, 77% of our in-scope suppliers provided a smelter and refiner list, allowing better determination of potential countries of origin and identification of facilities that process 3TG reported in our supply chain.

Based on the non-aggregated RMI RCOI data for the 332 smelters and refiners reported by our supply chain, we have reason to believe that 31 of the reported smelters and refiners might have sourced directly from the Covered Countries. Based on aggregated RCOI data from RMAP, LBMA, RJC, and TI-CMC, an additional 65 smelters and refiners might have directly sourced from the Covered Countries. 23 smelters and refiners may have indirectly

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

sourced from the Covered Countries. *All 119 smelters and refiners that were identified as directly or indirectly sourcing from the Covered Countries were deemed conformant to the RMAP, or cross-recognized RJC, LBMA, or TI-CMC audit protocols, as of December 31, 2025.*

We believe the countries of origin of 3TG contained in our products may include the following Covered Countries by mineral:

**Table 2. Covered Countries Country of Origin**

---

| | | | | | | |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Country of Origin** | **Gold** | **Recycled/ Scrap Gold** | **Tantalum** | **Tin** | **Recycled/ Scrap Tin** | **Tungsten** |
| Angola | | X | | | | |
| Burundi | | | X | X | | X |
| Central African Republic | | | | | | |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) | X | | X | X | | X |
| Republic of the Congo | | | | | | |
| Rwanda | | | X | X | | X |
| South Sudan | | | | | | |
| Tanzania | X | | | X | | X |
| Uganda | | X | | X | | X |
| Zambia | X | X | | | | |

---

Using the same methodology, we believe the country of origin of 3TG contained in our products may also include the countries listed in Annex I.

**Determination**

Through our 2025 data collection and due diligence efforts, we have reason to believe some 3TG contained in our products may come from Covered Countries. *All smelters and refiners that were identified as directly or indirectly sourcing from the Covered Countries were deemed conformant to the RMAP, or cross-recognized RJC, LBMA, or TI-CMC audit protocols, as of December 31, 2025.*

**7. Efforts to Determine the Mine or Location of Origin with the Greatest Possible Specificity**

Due to the nature of CMRT reporting and the complexities of our supply chain, we find it difficult to identify the specific location of mines in our supply chain. However, we have taken the following actions to determine the mine or location of origin of the 3TG in our products with the greatest possible specificity:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Conducted RCOI for suppliers whose parts contain 3TG and surveyed those suppliers using a risk-based approach

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Analyzed CMRTs from our suppliers for completeness, consistency, and for identification of smelters and refiners sourcing conflict minerals from the Covered Countries

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Compared reports from our suppliers with the expected responses, and when the information was incomplete or inconsistent with our RMS Policy or data expectations, we directly contacted our supplier to obtain additional or clarifying information, requesting improved reporting performance

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Assessed the information provided by our suppliers with the RMI members-only smelter database to obtain country of origin information

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Requested country of origin information directly from smelters and refiners not participating in RMAP

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**8.Steps Taken to Mitigate OECD Annex II, Environmental And Social Risks and Improve Due Diligence in Our Mineral Supply Chain**

In our *We are Committed to Protecting Human Rights and the Environment* policy, we commit to conducting due diligence and providing grievance mechanisms and remedies aligned with the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. Our policy is to source responsibly. We recognize that strict avoidance of a given mineral or

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

mineral origin could have unintended consequences, including the loss of livelihood for a local population. We support responsible sourcing from the Covered Countries as well as CAHRAs.

Our goal is to improve the transparency of mineral sourcing within our supply chain while improving the capacity of smelters and refiners globally to source 3TG originating from the Covered Countries while not funding armed groups, conflict in the area, or other serious abuses outlined in Annex II of the OECD Guidance. We aim to increase all smelter and refiner participation in RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC third-party validation programs to promote responsible sourcing not only from the Covered Countries but also CAHRAs.

Specifically, we set goals to: (i) obtain a 100% response and quality response rate from in-scope suppliers, (ii) increase the number of suppliers that provide a smelter and refiner list, (iii) increase our suppliers' use of only responsible sources of 3TG so we can better determine country of origin and enable responsible sourcing, and (iv) continuously improve our due diligence efforts. We have taken the following actions in support of these goals:

**Management System and Policies**

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Guided by our *We Are Committed to Protecting Human Rights and the Environment* policy, we are committed to respecting human rights, including the right to clean air and clean water, across our entire business, including our entire value chain. This commitment guides our decision-making and our actions, and extends to our suppliers and business partners, from the origin of the raw materials used to make our products to the end of life of these products. One of our sustainability aspirations is to source only raw materials that are responsibly produced.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Ford conducts an annual saliency assessment to identify and prioritize the Company's most significant human rights risks, and the areas where we can make an impact. The saliency assessment identifies potential high-risk human rights areas within our operations and along our value chain. Our 2025 saliency assessment re-validated our list of human rights and environment-related salient topics.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Our Supplier Code of Conduct is integrated within our Production Purchasing Global Terms and Conditions as a requirement to conduct business as a supplier to Ford. Our Supplier Code of Conduct requires all production suppliers globally to enforce a corresponding code of practice and require their subcontractors to do the same. Conflict minerals reporting is a contractual requirement for our production suppliers, and we require our suppliers to use smelters and refiners that have been validated as conformant to a third-party responsible mineral sourcing validation program.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• In 2022, we launched the integration of sustainability metrics into supplier sourcing decisions, including compliance with and quality of Conflict Minerals reporting. If a supplier has an unacceptable sustainability finding, the decision to source must be reviewed at the Global Commodity Director level and a corrective action plan must be in place.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Our Supply Chain and Supply Chain Sustainability team conducts direct engagement with top suppliers to review our Supplier Code and sustainability reporting requirements with supplier sales and sustainability teams.

**2025 Metrics and Training**

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We achieved a supplier conflict mineral reporting response rate of 100% for the 11<sup>th</sup> year in a row and 100% quality rating for the third year in a row.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Approximately 9% of suppliers reported only using conformant smelters and refiners.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We hosted three global conflict mineral training webinars with 254 attendees from suppliers that previously provided low-quality reports or were first-time conflict minerals reporters. The webinars focused on sharing responsible sourcing best practices to improve conflict mineral due diligence and reporting.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We conducted 8 internal training sessions for 457 Ford employees on mineral due diligence, human rights and working conditions, greenhouse gas emissions reporting, and Ford's Supplier Code. The training was provided to all Supply Chain commodity groups.

**Enhanced Risk Assessment and Mitigation to Support Responsible Sourcing of Minerals**

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We have integrated the RMI CAHRA tool into risk assessments for material prioritization, which was also used as input to expand due diligence on other materials as well as informed determination of a CAHRA.

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We donated funding directly to support the RMAP Assessment Fund, which covers the initial assessments for new RMAP auditees, financial assistance for participating auditees, and the publication of assessment results on RMI's website.

**Participation in External Organizations**

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We are an active member of the RMI (Member ID: FORD) and participate in cross-industry smelter and refiner outreach efforts to identify eligibility for the RMAP audit program. We also requested smelter and refiner participation in the RMAP. We actively participate in various RMI working groups, including the Smelter Engagement Team, Mineral Reporting Templates Team, Smelter Disposition, Due Diligence Practices, Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM), and Mineral Sensing and Prioritization.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We participated in the AIAG Responsible Materials Working Group to help scope industry mineral due diligence best practices. We also co-chair the AIAG Smelter Engagement Team, leading AIAG's coordinated industry outreach efforts to encourage smelter and refiner participation in RMAP. Team members also participated in AIAG event panels, including the Forced Labor Due Diligence Conference on May 15, the Responsible Materials Conference on September 10, and the Mexico Automotive Forum on November 14.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Members of the Supply Chain Sustainability team attended the 2025 OECD Forum on Responsible Mineral Supply Chains in Paris, France, May 5-7. Attendees listened to plenaries and panel sessions about many aspects of responsible sourcing. Forum attendees included key stakeholders including downstream companies (including Ford), mines, smelters and refiners, governments, non-governmental organizations, and representatives from Indigenous communities.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We attended the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Outreach Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on May 13. The Outreach Meeting was intended for members of RBA and its initiatives, suppliers, and non-member companies. Topics included supply chain due diligence, emerging forced labor regulations, environmental due diligence strategy and tools, and a public policy review and forecast.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• We attended the 2025 Responsible Business Alliance / Responsible Minerals Initiative Conference in Washington DC, November 11-14. Member and non-member companies, plus representatives from industry, government, intergovernmental organizations, civil society, and other key stakeholders, attended the event and participated in plenaries, panel sessions, and training sessions about responsible business conduct, including labor and environmental issues and how to create positive impact. Ford participated in a RMI panel on November 13.

**Our Goals for 2026**

We will continue our commitment to responsible 3TG sourcing by collaborating with industry, multi-stakeholder groups, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), engaging suppliers in continuous improvements to adopt best practices, and improving internal risk assessment and management systems. Our goals to achieve continuous improvement include:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Strengthen smelter and refiner engagement to increase use of and participation in RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC as required by Ford's Production Purchasing Global Terms and Conditions and Supplier Code.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Work to strengthen our Single Point of Contact (SPOC) outreach to more smelters and refiners to become active in the RMAP program, targeting completing five RMI Company Inquiry Questionnaires (CIQ) to help identify global smelters and refiners of 3TG, as well as work with two 3TG refiners directly to achieve "active" RMAP status, and support smelters and refiners to achieve "conformant" status.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Continue employing and building participation with relevant smelters and refiners in the RMI Risk Readiness Assessment (RRA) tool to assess overall management beyond performance to OECD Guidance; set a target to invite 100.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Update training materials annually and cascade to our Supply Chain employees.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Strengthen our responsible sourcing capacity by continuously improving our mineral due diligence per OECD Guidance.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;• Update our RMS Policy as needed to address the assessment and mitigation of risks in Ford's 3TG and mineral supply chains.

<br> <br> <br>

------

<br> <br> <br>

**<u>Annex</u> <u>I</u>**

**Countries of Origin of 3TG** 

-Based on the information provided by our suppliers as well as from the RMI RCOI data that includes aggregated country of origin for RMAP, RJC, LBMA, and TI-CMC conformant processing facilities

---

| | | | |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| Albania | Algeria | Andorra | Angola |
| Anguilla | Antigua and Barbuda | Argentina | Aruba |
| Australia | Austria | Azerbaijan | Bahamas |
| Bangladesh | Barbados | Belarus | Belgium |
| Benin | Bolivia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana |
| Brazil | Bulgaria | Burkina Faso | Burundi |
| Cambodia | Cameroon | Canada | Cayman Islands |
| Chile | China | Chinese Taipei | Columbia |
| Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Costa Rica | Côte d'Ivoire | Croatia |
| Curacao | Cyprus | Czech Republic | Denmark |
| Dominica | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Egypt |
| El Salvador | Estonia | Eswatini | Ethiopia |
| Fiji | Finland | France | French Guiana |
| Georgia | Germany | Ghana | Greece |
| Grenada | Guatemala | Guinea | Guyana |
| Honduras | Hong Kong | Hungary | Iceland |
| India | Indonesia | Ireland | Israel |
| Italy | Jamaica | Japan | Jordan |
| Kazakhstan | Kenya | Kuwait | Kyrgyzstan |
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | Latvia | Lebanon | Liberia |
| Liechtenstein | Lithuania | Luxembourg | Macao |
| Madagascar | Malaysia | Mali | Malta |
| Mauritania | Mexico | Moldova, Republic of | Monaco |
| Mongolia | Morocco | Mozambique | Myanmar |
| Namibia | Netherlands | New Zealand | Nicaragua |
| Niger | Nigeria | Norway | Oman |
| Panama | Papua New Guinea | Peru | Philippines |
| Poland | Portugal | Puerto Rico | Romania |
| Russian Federation<sup>2</sup> | Rwanda | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Saint Luca |
| Saint Vincent and Grenadines | Saudi Arabia | Senegal | Serbia |
| Sierra Leone | Singapore | Sint Maarten | Solomon Islands |
| Slovakia | Slovenia | South Africa | South Korea |
| Spain | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Suriname |
| Sweden | Switzerland | Tajikistan | Tanzania |
| Thailand | Timor-Leste | Togo | Trinidad and Tobago |
| Tunisia | Turkey | Uganda | Ukraine |
| United Arab Emirates | United Kingdom | United States of America | Uruguay |
| Uzbekistan | Venezuela | Vietnam | Zambia |
| Zimbabwe |  |  |  |

---

<sup>2</sup> Ford does not directly import gold from the Russian Federation. If any gold in products supplied to us was from any Russian Federation gold smelter or refinery, it would have been substantially transformed prior to receipt and incorporation into our finished products.

<br> <br> <br>

<br>