# EDGAR Filing Document

**Accession Number:** 0001066247
**File Stem:** 0001193125-23-076336
**Filing Date:** 2023-3
**Character Count:** 320195
**Document Hash:** 09b0068e20792f0a542cf1816b0a7826
**Contains OCR:** False
**Source Format:** 

## Filing Content

## Filing Summary
**0001193125-23-076336.hdr.sgml**: 20230322

**ACCESSION NUMBER**: 0001193125-23-076336

**CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE**: ARS

**PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT**: 1

**CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT**: 20221231

**FILED AS OF DATE**: 20230322

**DATE AS OF CHANGE**: 20230322

**EFFECTIVENESS DATE**: 20230322

**FILER**: 

**COMPANY DATA:**
- **COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:** REGENCY CENTERS CORP
- **CENTRAL INDEX KEY:** 0000910606
- **STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION:** REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS [6798]
- **IRS NUMBER:** 593191743
- **STATE OF INCORPORATION:** FL
- **FISCAL YEAR END:** 1231

**FILING VALUES:**
- **FORM TYPE:** ARS
- **SEC ACT:** 1934 Act
- **SEC FILE NUMBER:** 001-12298
- **FILM NUMBER:** 23751554

**BUSINESS ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE
- **STREET 2:** SUITE 114
- **CITY:** JACKSONVILLE
- **STATE:** FL
- **ZIP:** 32202
- **BUSINESS PHONE:** 9045987000

**MAIL ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE
- **STREET 2:** SUITE 114
- **CITY:** JACKSONVILLE
- **STATE:** FL
- **ZIP:** 32202

**FORMER COMPANY:**
- **FORMER CONFORMED NAME:** REGENCY REALTY CORP
- **DATE OF NAME CHANGE:** 19930813
**FILER**: 

**COMPANY DATA:**
- **COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:** REGENCY CENTERS LP
- **CENTRAL INDEX KEY:** 0001066247
- **STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION:** REAL ESTATE [6500]
- **IRS NUMBER:** 593429602
- **STATE OF INCORPORATION:** DE
- **FISCAL YEAR END:** 1231

**FILING VALUES:**
- **FORM TYPE:** ARS
- **SEC ACT:** 1934 Act
- **SEC FILE NUMBER:** 000-24763
- **FILM NUMBER:** 23751555

**BUSINESS ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE
- **STREET 2:** STE 114
- **CITY:** JACKSONVILLE
- **STATE:** FL
- **ZIP:** 32202
- **BUSINESS PHONE:** 9043567000

**MAIL ADDRESS:**
- **STREET 1:** ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE
- **STREET 2:** STE 114
- **CITY:** JACKSONVILLE
- **STATE:** FL
- **ZIP:** 32202

### Attached PDF Documents

**Attachment 1:** `d412077dars.pdf`

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)

RegencyCenters.com

![img-2.jpeg](img-2.jpeg)

![img-3.jpeg](img-3.jpeg)

2022

# Annual Report

Regency® Centers.

# To Our Fellow Shareholders

As Regency embarks on its 60th year of operations and 30th year as a publicly traded REIT, we are immensely proud of the company we were and the company we have become. Our long-term track record of sector-leading performance is a testament to the quality of our portfolio, our relationships with our tenants, the strength of our balance sheet, and a special corporate culture that allows us to attract and retain a talented and committed team.

2022 was another strong year for Regency. We continue to benefit from post-pandemic structural tailwinds, including migration patterns and permanent flexible work trends that support the strength of our suburban trade areas. We saw robust tenant demand throughout the year, culminating in record shop space leasing and tenant retention rates, mid-teens rent growth, including the impact of contractual rent steps, and the performance of our development and redevelopment projects.

We enter 2023 with great momentum and persistent strength in the operating environment, and our leasing and value-creation pipelines are robust. We do recognize the uncertainty associated with the macroeconomic backdrop. While our centers and tenants may be largely recession-resistant, we would not be immune to a material slowdown in the U.S. economy. At the same time, we take comfort in having built a company and amassed a portfolio that can withstand as well as outperform through cycles. Our current tenant base is as strong and resilient as ever, and our exposure to struggling retailers is limited. The demographic profile of our trade areas, as well as the non-discretionary nature of our tenancy, insulates us from both inflationary and economic impacts on the consumer.

![img-4.jpeg](img-4.jpeg)

Lastly,

As such, we entered 2023 well-positioned from a capital allocation perspective. With over $140 million of free cash flow expected, we have the capability to self-fund our current construction projects and to grow our development and redevelopment pipelines back to an annual spend north of $200 million over the next few years. We still consider development and redevelopment as the best use of our capital and the strongest pathways toward value creation. As always, we will look to raise incremental capital to fund investments if the opportunity creates value and drives accretion.

Regency takes pride in being a respected leader in corporate responsibility, and our actions in 2022 furthered our efforts in that regard. After a year of building a strategy to do so, we established an absolute short-term (2030) scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction target endorsed by the Science Based Targets initiative ('SBTi'), as well as set a long-term (2050) target to achieve net zero scope 1 and 2 emissions. Doing what is right for our employees, communities, and shareholders is core to our values at Regency.

![img-5.jpeg](img-5.jpeg)

## 2022 Highlights

### Operational Strength

- Executed 8.2M square feet of new and renewal leases, exceeding historical averages
- Grew leased occupancy 80 bps year-over-year to end 2022 with a same-property leased rate of 95.1%
- Grew shop (<10K square feet) occupancy by a record 200 bps year-over-year to 92.0%
- Nearly 85% of 2022 leasing activity included embedded rent steps
- Generated approximately 9% Core Operating Earnings per share growth, excluding the collection of 2020 and 2021 receivables reserved
- Increased by 6.3% year-over-year Same Property NOI, excluding lease termination fees and the collection of 2020 and 2021 receivables reserved

### Balance Sheet, Liquidity & Dividend

- Full availability on our $1.25B unsecured credit line at year-end
- No unsecured debt maturities until 2024
- Trailing 12-Month Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.0x at year-end
- Maintained S&P and Moody's investment grade credit ratings of BBB+ and Baa1, respectively, with Moody's outlook revised from stable to positive in September 2022
- Closed over $120 million of new secured property-level debt during 2022 at Regency's share, at attractive market rates
- Generated over $155M of free cash flow after dividend and capital expenditures
- Raised our quarterly common dividend by 4% in 4Q22 to $0.65 per share
- Dividend CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 3.8% since 2014

### Investment Activity & Capital Recycling

- Completed north of $120 million of value-add development and redevelopment projects with over $300M of projects in process at year-end
- Completed acquisitions of grocery-anchored centers totaling nearly $210M
- Sold close to $180M of non-strategic and lower-growth assets
- Settled approximately 1.0 million shares under forward sale agreements entered into during 2021 in connection with our ATM program, at an average gross issuance price of $65.78 per share

![img-6.jpeg](img-6.jpeg)

Pablo Plaza - Jacksonville Beach, FL

![img-7.jpeg](img-7.jpeg)

Glenwood Green - Old Bridge, NJ

## Key Achievements in our Four Corporate Responsibility Pillars: Our People, Our Communities, Governance, and Environmental Stewardship

- Regency and our employees donated roughly $1.5 million in 2022, including close to $1 million to local United Way organizations in the communities in which we operate, with over 95% participation and 1,200 volunteer hours during our annual campaign
- Further improved Board refreshment and diversity, with 42% of seats held by women and ethnically diverse directors as of February 2023
- Received endorsement by SBTi for our short-term (2030) scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions reduction target and set a target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050
- Included for a fourth consecutive year on Newsweek's Most Responsible Companies List, ranked top 75 in 2023
- Named to The Wall Street Journal Management Top 250 list of the best-managed Companies for 2022
- Rated currently with the highest score of "1" in ISS's Governance and Environmental QualityScore categories
- Earned a GRESB® (Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark) Green Star for the eighth consecutive year and an "A" for public disclosure
- In 2022, Regency received a rating of "A" in the MSCI ESG Ratings assessment
- Recognized as a Green Lease Leader in sustainable leasing with a Gold designation
- Included in the 2022 Bloomberg Gender Equality Index
- Regency's 'ourCommunities' Program allowed employees to direct a portion of our corporate philanthropic donations toward charitable organizations of their choice
- Received the Healthiest Companies Award from the First Coast Workplace Wellness Council for the 14th consecutive year for our comprehensive employee benefits and commitment to employee health

![img-8.jpeg](img-8.jpeg)

![img-9.jpeg](img-9.jpeg)

![img-10.jpeg](img-10.jpeg)

Valencia Crossroads - Valencia, CA

## We Live Our Core Values

We have lived our values for 60 years by executing and successfully meeting our commitments to our people, customers, and our communities. We hold ourselves to that high standard every day. Our exceptional culture will set us apart into the future through our unending dedication to these beliefs:

WE ARE OUR PEOPLE.

Our people are our greatest asset, and we believe a talented team from differing backgrounds and experiences makes us better.

WE DO WHAT IS RIGHT.

We believe in acting with unwavering standards of honesty and integrity.

WE CONNECT WITH OUR COMMUNITIES.

We promote philanthropic ideals and strive for the betterment of our neighborhoods by giving our time and financial support.

WE ARE RESPONSIBLE.

Our duty is to balance purpose and profit, being good stewards of capital and the environment for the benefit of all our stakeholders.

WE STRIVE FOR EXCELLENCE.

When we are passionate about what we do, it is reflected in our performance.

WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER.

When we listen to each other and our customers, we will succeed together.

As always, Regency could not have accomplished all that we have over the last year, and the last 60 years, without the incredible support of our stakeholders - including our investors, tenants, co-investment partners, service providers and communities, our exceptional Board of Directors, and our best-in-class team. We are grateful for the dedication, time, and engagement that you continue to provide Regency. We are incredibly proud of the company and culture that we have built, but we are even more excited about Regency's future and sharing our progress with all of you.

Sincerely,

Lisa Palmer, President & Chief Executive Officer

Martin E. (Hap) Stein, Jr., Executive Chairman

![img-11.jpeg](img-11.jpeg)

![img-12.jpeg](img-12.jpeg)

# **UNITED STATES**
**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**
Washington, DC 20549
**FORM 10-K**

☒ **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

or

☐ **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the transition period from ______ to

Commission File Number 1-12298 (Regency Centers Corporation)

Commission File Number 0-24763 (Regency Centers, L.P.)

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**
**REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

**FLORIDA (REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION)**
**DELAWARE (REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.)**

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

**59-3191743**
**59-3429602**

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

**One Independent Drive, Suite 114**
**Jacksonville, Florida 32202**

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

**(904) 598-7000**

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

**Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:**

**Regency Centers Corporation**

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Common Stock, $.01 par value | REG | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
| Regency Centers, L.P. |  |  |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| None | N/A | N/A |

**Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:**

**Regency Centers Corporation:** None

**Regency Centers, L.P.:** Units of Partnership Interest

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

**Regency Centers Corporation** Yes ☒ No ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act

**Regency Centers Corporation** Yes ☐ No ☒ **Regency Centers, L.P.** Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

**Regency Centers Corporation** Yes ☒ No ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

**Regency Centers Corporation** Yes ☒ No ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

**Regency Centers Corporation:**

Large accelerated filer ☑ Accelerated filer ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

**Regency Centers, L.P.:**

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☑ Smaller reporting company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

**Regency Centers Corporation** ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

**Regency Centers Corporation** ☑ **Regency Centers, L.P.** ☑

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.1

**Regency Centers Corporation** ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to Section 240.10D-1(b).1

**Regency Centers Corporation** ☐ **Regency Centers, L.P.** ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

**Regency Centers Corporation** Yes ☐ No ☑ **Regency Centers, L.P.** Yes ☐ No ☑

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants' most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

**Regency Centers Corporation** $10.1 billion **Regency Centers, L.P.** N/A

The number of shares outstanding of the Regency Centers Corporation's common stock was 171,307,927 as of February 16, 2023.

**Documents Incorporated by Reference**

Portions of Regency Centers Corporation's proxy statement, prepared in connection with its upcoming 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent described therein.

1 Per SEC guidance, this blank checkbox is included on this cover page but no disclosure with respect thereto shall be made until the adoption and effectiveness of related stock exchange listing standards.

## EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Report") combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, of Regency Centers Corporation and Regency Centers, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to "Regency Centers Corporation" or the "Parent Company" mean Regency Centers Corporation and its controlled subsidiaries and references to "Regency Centers, L.P." or the "Operating Partnership" mean Regency Centers, L.P. and its controlled subsidiaries. The terms "we," "our," "us," "the Company", "Regency Centers" and "Regency" as used in this Report mean the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, collectively.

The Parent Company is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") and the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership's capital includes general and limited common Partnership Units ("Units"). As of December 31, 2022, the Parent Company owned approximately 99.6% of the Units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining limited Units are owned by third party investors. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company has exclusive control of the Operating Partnership's day-to-day management.

We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:

- Enhances investors' understanding of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
- Eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation; and
- Creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of the Parent Company consists of the same individuals as the management of the Operating Partnership. These individuals are officers of the Parent Company and employees of the Operating Partnership.

The Company believes it is important to understand the key differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. The Parent Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of Units of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. As a result, the Parent Company does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing certain debt of the Operating Partnership. Except for $200 million of unsecured private placement debt, the Parent Company does not hold any indebtedness, but guarantees all of the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is also the co-issuer and guarantees the $200 million of Parent Company debt. The Operating Partnership holds all the assets of the Company and retains the ownership interests in the Company's joint ventures. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by the Parent Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company's business. These sources include the Operating Partnership's operations, its direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, and the issuance of partnership units.

Stockholders' equity, partners' capital, and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Parent Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership's capital includes general and limited common Partnership Units. The limited partners' Units in the Operating Partnership owned by third parties are accounted for in partners' capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements and outside of stockholders' equity in noncontrolling interests in the Parent Company's financial statements.

In order to highlight the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, there are sections in this Report that separately discuss the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, including separate financial statements, controls and procedures sections, and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications. In the sections that combine disclosure for the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, this Report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company.

As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and the Parent Company does not have assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, while stockholders' equity and partners' capital differ as discussed above, the assets and liabilities of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

| Item No. |  | Form 10-K Report Page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PART I |  |  |
| 1. | Business | 1 |
| 1A. | Risk Factors | 9 |
| 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 22 |
| 2. | Properties | 23 |
| 3. | Legal Proceedings | 38 |
| 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 38 |
| PART II |  |  |
| 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 38 |
| 6. | Reserved | 39 |
| 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 40 |
| 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 55 |
| 8. | Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 57 |
| 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 119 |
| 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 119 |
| 9B. | Other Information | 119 |
| 9C. | Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection | 119 |
| PART III |  |  |
| 10. | Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance | 120 |
| 11. | Executive Compensation | 120 |
| 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 121 |
| 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 121 |
| 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 121 |
| PART IV |  |  |
| 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 122 |
| 16. | Form 10-K Summary | 127 |
| SIGNATURES |  |  |
| 17. | Signatures | 128 |

# **Forward-Looking Statements**

Certain statements in this document regarding anticipated financial, business, legal or other outcomes including business and market conditions, outlook and other similar statements relating to Regency's future events, developments, or financial or operational performance or results, are "forward-looking statements" made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "would," "expect," "estimate," "believe," "intend," "forecast," "project," "anticipate," "guidance," and other similar language. However, the absence of these or similar words or expressions does not mean a statement is not forward-looking. While we believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance these expectations will be attained, and it is possible actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties.

Our operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those described in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of this Report. When considering an investment in our securities, you should carefully read and consider these risks, together with all other information in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and our other filings with and submissions to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). If any of the events described in the risk factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results, as well as the market price of our securities, could be materially adversely affected. Forward-looking statements are only as of the date they are made, and Regency undertakes no duty to update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or developments or otherwise, except as and to the extent required by law.

# PART I

# Item 1. Business

Regency Centers Corporation is a fully integrated real estate company and self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust that began its operations as a publicly-traded REIT in 1993. Our corporate headquarters are located at One Independent Drive, Suite 114, Jacksonville, Florida. Regency Centers, L.P. is the entity through which Regency Centers Corporation conducts substantially all of its operations and owns substantially all of its assets. Our business consists of acquiring, developing, owning, and operating income-producing retail real estate principally located in top markets within the United States. We generate revenues by leasing space to necessity, service, convenience, and value-based retailers serving the essential needs of our communities. Regency has been an S&P 500 Index member since 2017.

As of December 31, 2022, we had full or partial ownership interests in 404 properties, primarily anchored by market leading grocery stores, encompassing 51.1 million square feet ("SF") of gross leasable area ("GLA"). Our Pro-rata share of this GLA is 43.3 million square feet, including our share of properties owned through unconsolidated investment partnerships.

We are a preeminent national owner, operator, and developer of shopping centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics. Our mission is to create thriving environments for retailers and service providers to connect with surrounding neighborhoods and communities. Our vision is to elevate quality of life as an integral thread in the fabric of our communities. Our portfolio includes thriving properties merchandised with highly productive grocers, restaurants, service providers, and best-in-class retailers that connect with their neighborhoods, communities, and customers.

Our values:

- We are our people: Our people are our greatest asset, and we believe a talented team from differing backgrounds and experiences makes us better.
- We do what is right: We act with unwavering standards of honesty and integrity.
- We connect with our communities: We promote philanthropic ideas and strive for the betterment of our neighborhoods by giving our time and financial support.
- We are responsible: Our duty is to balance purpose and profit, being good stewards of capital and the environment for the benefit of all our stakeholders.
- We strive for excellence: When we are passionate about what we do, it is reflected in our performance.
- We are better together: When we listen to each other and our customers, we will succeed together.

1

Our goals are to:

- Own and manage a portfolio of high-quality neighborhood and community shopping centers primarily anchored by market leading grocers and principally located in suburban trade areas in the most desirable metro areas in the United States of America ("USA" or "United States"). We believe that this strategy will result in highly desirable and attractive centers with best-in-class retailers. These centers should command higher rental and occupancy rates resulting in excellent prospects to grow net operating income ("NOI");
- Maintain an industry leading and disciplined development and redevelopment platform to create exceptional retail centers that deliver favorable returns;
- Support our business activities with a conservative capital structure, including a strong balance sheet with sufficient liquidity to meet our capital needs together with a carefully constructed debt maturity profile;
- Implement leading environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") practices through our Corporate Responsibility Program;
- Engage and retain an exceptional and diverse team that is guided by our strong values, while fostering an environment of innovation and continuous improvement; and
- Create shareholder value by increasing earnings and dividends per share that generate total returns at or near the top of our shopping center peers.

Key strategies to achieve our goals are to:

- Generate same property NOI growth that over the long-term consistently ranks at or near the top of our shopping center peers;
- Reinvest free cash flow and portfolio enhancement disposition proceeds into high-quality developments, redevelopments and acquisitions in a long term accretive manner;
- Maintain a conservative balance sheet that provides liquidity, financial flexibility and cost effective funding of investment opportunities, while also managing debt maturities that enable us to weather economic downturns;
- Pursue best-in-class ESG programs and practices; and
- Attract, retain, and engage an exceptional and diverse team that is guided by our values while fostering an environment of innovation and continuous improvement.

## Competition

We are among the largest owners of shopping centers in the USA based on revenues, number of properties, GLA, and market capitalization. There are numerous companies and individuals engaged in the ownership, development, acquisition, and operation of shopping centers that compete with us in our targeted markets, including grocery store chains that own shopping centers and also anchor some of our shopping centers. This results in competition for attracting tenants as well as acquiring existing shopping centers and new development sites. In addition, brick and mortar shopping centers face continued competition from alternative shopping and delivery methods. We believe that our competitive advantages are driven by:

- the market areas in which we operate, and the locations of our shopping centers within those market areas;
- the design of our shopping centers including our strategy of maintaining and renovating these centers to our high standards of quality;
- the compelling demographics surrounding our shopping centers;
- our relationships with our anchor, shop, and out-parcel tenants;
- our management experience and expertise; and
- our ability to successfully develop, redevelop, and acquire shopping centers.

2

# Corporate Responsibility and Human Capital

While executing our mission, we strive to achieve best-in-class corporate responsibility. Corporate responsibility, including our focus on ESG practices, is a foundational strategy of Regency. We believe that alignment of strategy and sustainable outcomes is critical to the long-term success of our Company, our shareholders, and the environment. Our ESG practices are built on four pillars:

- Ethics and Governance; and

These practices are guided by three overarching concepts: long-term value creation, our Regency brand and reputation, and the importance of maintaining our culture. Our continued commitment to these concepts guides our business strategy and helps us identify and address key corporate responsibility-related matters.

We regularly review our corporate responsibility (which term we use interchangeably with 'ESG') strategies, goals, and objectives with our Board of Directors and its committees, which oversee our programs. More information about our corporate responsibility strategy, goals, performance, and reporting, including our annual Corporate Responsibility report, our Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ('TCFD') report, and our policies and practices related to corporate responsibility, is available on our website at www.regencycenters.com. The content of our website and other information contained therein, including relating to corporate responsibility, is not incorporated by reference into this Report or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.

*Our People* - Our people are our most important asset, and we strive to ensure that they are engaged, passionate about their work, connected to their teams, and supported to deliver their best performance. Regency recognizes and values the importance of attracting and retaining talented individuals with different skills, backgrounds, and experiences to encourage diversity of thoughts and ideas. In addition, we strive to maintain a safe and healthy workspace, promote employee well-being, and empower our employees by focusing on their personal and professional development through training and education opportunities.

As of December 31, 2022, we had 445 employees, including 5 part-time employees. We presently maintain 22 market offices nationwide, including our corporate headquarters in Jacksonville, Florida. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit, and we believe our relationship with our employees is good.

In 2022, we continued implementing our comprehensive, multi-year diversity, equity, and inclusion ('DEI') strategy focused on promoting and advancing diversity across our organization, enabling our employees to grow and succeed, and supporting social justice initiatives in our operations and broader communities. Furthermore, aligned with our near-and long-term human capital goals, we remained focused on employee engagement, leveraging our annual employee survey to identify opportunities to improve and further engage our people. Additionally, we continued to develop our employees and look for new opportunities to ensure we attract and retain our most important assets: our people.

*Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion* - We believe that much of our success is rooted in the diversity and inclusion of our teams and our commitment to a diverse and inclusive culture. We value diversity at all levels and focus on extending our DEI initiatives across our workforce. We continue to foster a culture in which everyone is respected, valued, and has an equal opportunity to contribute and thrive. Our commitment is unwavering, and we remain focused on building a workforce that represents the many customers we serve and the communities in which we operate.

Our most recent U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission EEO-1 survey data can be found on our website, including additional information related to employee gender and ethnic diversity.

*Human Rights* - Regency is committed to a workplace free from discrimination and harassment and is focused on advancing fundamental human rights. Anti-discrimination and anti-harassment training is provided to all employees at orientation, and annually thereafter.

*Talent Attraction and Retention* - Our core values place a strong importance on our people, which we believe makes us an employer of choice. We understand the importance of attracting and retaining the best talent to build long-term value. We strive to offer some of the most competitive pay and benefits in the industry in which we operate and are continually looking for new opportunities to ensure that we attract and retain our people.

3

*Training and Development* - We strive to provide an environment where our people are connected to their teams, passionate about what they do, and supported to deliver their best efforts and results. From individual contributors to managers and senior leaders, we want to empower our employees to take control of their career growth and realize their full potential through meaningful training and development opportunities.

*Health, Safety, and Well-Being* - The safety, health, and well-being of our people are a top priority for Regency. We strive to provide a benefit package that is comprehensive, competitive, and thoughtfully designed to attract and retain the best in the business. We prioritize employee safety at our centers and offices, and require contractors working at our sites to engage in safe work practices.

*Our Communities* - Our predominately grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers provide many benefits to the communities in which we live and work, including significant local economic impacts in the form of investment, jobs, and taxes. Our local teams are passionate about investing in and engaging with our communities as they customize and cultivate our centers to create a distinctive environment to bring our tenants and shoppers together for the best retail experience.

We believe philanthropy and charitable giving are important elements of our corporate responsibility commitment. Throughout 2022, Regency supported its employees to serve and invest in community organizations through volunteer and financial support. Charitable contributions were made directly by the Company, as well as by the vast majority of our employees who donated their time and money to local non-profits directly serving their communities. Furthermore, as part of our strategy, we continued to improve our communities by investing in property enhancements and placemaking at our new and existing shopping centers.

*Ethics and Governance* - As long-term stewards of our investors’ capital, we are committed to best-in-class corporate governance. To create long-term value for our stakeholders, we place great emphasis on our culture and core values, the integrity and transparency of our reporting practices, and our overall governance structure in respect of oversight and shareholder rights.

To achieve the right mix of skills, experience, backgrounds, tenures, and competencies, including diversity in terms of gender, ethnic background, age, and other attributes, Regency’s board of directors annually reviews its overall board composition. In 2022, Regency announced the appointment of Kristin A. Campbell to our board of directors, effective January 15, 2023. Mrs. Campbell’s appointment aligns with Regency’s ongoing commitment to board refreshment and best-in-class corporate governance.

*Environmental Stewardship* - We believe sustainability is in the best interest of our investors, tenants, employees, and the communities in which we operate, and we strive to integrate sustainable practices throughout our business.

We have seven strategic priorities for identifying and implementing sustainable business practices and minimizing our environmental impact: green building, energy efficiency, renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions ('GHG') reduction, water conservation, waste management, and climate change analysis. We believe these strategic priorities are not only the right thing to do to address environmental concerns such as air pollution, climate change, and resource scarcity but also support us in achieving key strategic objectives in our operations and development projects.

During 2022, we remained committed to measuring and reducing our GHG emissions. Earlier in the year, we refined our strategy and elevated our commitment by aligning our goals with the Science Based Targets initiative ('SBTi'). We have committed to reducing our absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 28% by 2030 from a 2019 base year, endorsed by the SBTi, and to achieve net-zero Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions across all operations by 2050. Concurrently, we announced new near-and long-term goals to demonstrate our commitment to environmental sustainability as described in our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report. Based on our current estimates and asset base, we do not expect these commitments to materially impact our operating results and financial condition.

As a long-term owner, operator, and developer of real estate, we acknowledge the potential for climate change to have a material impact on our properties, people, and long-term success. Regency wants to ensure that our properties can safely, sustainably, and responsibly withstand the test of time. We continue to refine our understanding of our exposure to climate-related impacts by conducting ongoing property-level analysis. We continue our efforts to understand and address the risks that climate change may pose to our business.

### Compliance with Governmental Regulations

We are subject to various regulatory and tax-related requirements within the jurisdictions in which we operate. Changes to such requirements may result in unanticipated material financial impacts or adverse tax consequences and could materially affect our operating results and financial condition. Significant regulatory requirements include the laws and regulations described below.

4

## REIT Laws and Regulations

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the federal income tax laws. As a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. Under the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), REITs are subject to numerous regulatory requirements, including the requirement to generally distribute at least 90% of taxable income each year. We will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates if we fail to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes in any taxable year, or to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our taxable income. We will also generally not qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

We have elected to treat certain of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"). In general, a TRS may engage in any real estate business and certain non-real estate businesses, subject to certain limitations under the Code. A TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes which, to date, have not been material to us.

## Environmental Laws and Regulations

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be liable for the cost to assess and remediate certain hazardous substances at our shopping centers. To the extent any environmental issues arise, they most typically stem from the historic practices of current and former dry cleaners, gas stations, and other similar businesses at our centers, as well as the presence of asbestos in some structures. These requirements often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or committed the acts or omissions that caused the presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly address contamination caused by such substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. Although we have a number of properties that could require or are currently undergoing varying levels of assessment and remediation, known environmental liabilities are not currently expected to have a material impact on our financial condition.

## Information About Our Executive Officers

Our executive officers are appointed each year by our Board of Directors. Each of our executive officers has been employed by us for more than five years and, as of December 31, 2022, included the following:

| Name | Age | Title | Executive Officer in Position Shown Since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 70 | Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors | 2020 (1) |
| Lisa Palmer | 55 | President and Chief Executive Officer | 2020 (2) |
| Michael J. Mas | 47 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 2019 (3) |
| James D. Thompson | 67 | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | 2019 (4) |

(1) Mr. Stein was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors effective January 1, 2020. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Stein served as Chief Executive Officer from 1993 through December 31, 2019 and Chairman of the Board since 1999.

(2) Ms. Palmer was named Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2020, in addition to her responsibilities as President, a position she has held since January 2016. Prior to this appointment, Ms. Palmer served as Chief Financial Officer since January 2013. Prior to that, Ms. Palmer served as Senior Vice President of Capital Markets since 2003 and has been with the Company since 1996.

(3) Mr. Mas assumed the responsibilities of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer effective August 2019. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Mas served as Managing Director, Finance, since February 2017, and Senior Vice President, Capital Markets, since 2013.

(4) Mr. Thompson assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, effective August 2019. Mr. Thompson previously served as our Executive Vice President of Operations since 2016 and Managing Director - East since 1993. As previously announced, Mr. Thompson retired from the Company as of December 31, 2022 and effective January 1, 2023, he was succeeded by the following members of senior management:

- Mr. Alan Roth, age 47, now Executive Vice President, National Property Operations and East Region President, was formerly Senior Managing Director, East Region since 2020. Prior to that, he served as Managing Director Northeast Region since 2016. Other positions held since joining the Company in 1997 include Senior Vice President and Senior Market Officer of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Portfolio, and Vice President and Regional Officer. Mr. Roth is responsible for operations strategy and processes nationally, as well as overseeing execution of the operations and investment strategies in our Northeast and Southeast regions.
- Mr. Nick Wibbenmeyer, age 42, now Executive Vice President, West Region President, was formerly Senior Managing Director, West Region since 2020. Prior to that, he served as Managing Director of Florida and the Midwest Region, respectively. Other positions held since joining the Company in 2005 include Senior Vice President and Senior Market Officer, Vice President and Market Officer, and Vice President of Investments. Mr. Wibbenmeyer is responsible for investment and development strategy and processes nationally, as well as overseeing execution of the operations and investment strategies in our West and Central regions.

5

## Company Website Access and SEC Filings

Our website may be accessed at www.regencycenters.com. All of our filings with the SEC can be accessed free of charge through our website promptly after filing; however, in the event that the website is inaccessible, we will provide paper copies of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, the most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q, current reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K, and all related amendments, excluding exhibits, free of charge upon request. These filings are also accessible on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.

## General Information

Our registrar and stock transfer agent is Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge"), Lake Success, NY. We offer a dividend reinvestment plan ("DRIP") that enables our shareholders to reinvest dividends automatically, as well as to make voluntary cash payments toward the purchase of additional shares. For more information, contact Broadridge toll free at (877) 830-4936 or our Shareholder Relations Department at (904) 598-7000.

The Company's common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and trades under the stock symbol "REG".

Our independent registered public accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, Firm ID 185.

## Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders is currently expected to be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2023, and will be conducted in a virtual-only format to the extent permitted by applicable law.

## Non-GAAP Measures

In addition to the required Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") presentations, we use and report certain non-GAAP measures as we believe these measures improve the understanding of our operational results. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to our Board of Directors, management and investors regarding certain trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, purposes of determining management incentive compensation and budgeting, forecasting and planning purposes. We continually evaluate the usefulness, relevance, limitations, and calculation of our reported non-GAAP measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the public, and thus such reported measures could change.

We do not consider non-GAAP measures an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, rather they supplement GAAP measures by providing additional information we believe to be useful to our shareholders. The principal limitation of these non-GAAP measures is they may exclude significant expense and income items that are required by GAAP to be recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, they reflect the exercise of management's judgment about which expense and income items are excluded or included in determining these non-GAAP measures. In order to compensate for these limitations, reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures we use to their most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided. Non-GAAP measures should not be relied upon in evaluating the financial condition, results of operations, or future prospects of the Company.

## Defined Terms

The following terms, as defined, are commonly used by management and the investing public to understand and evaluate our operational results, and are included in this document:

- *Core Operating Earnings* is an additional performance measure we use because the computation of Nareit Funds from Operations ("Nareit FFO") includes certain non-comparable items that affect our period-over-period performance. Core Operating Earnings excludes from Nareit FFO: (i) transaction related income or expenses, (ii) gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt, (iii) certain non-cash components of earnings derived from above and below market rent amortization, straight-line rents, and amortization of mark-to-market debt adjustments, and (iv) other amounts as they occur. We provide reconciliations of both Net income attributable to common stockholders to Nareit FFO and Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings.
- *Development Completion* is a Property in Development that is deemed complete upon the earlier of: (i) 90% of total estimated net development costs have been incurred and percent leased equals or exceeds 95%, or (ii) the property features at least two years of anchor operations. Once deemed complete, the property is termed a Retail Operating Property.
- *Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio* is defined as Operating EBITDAre divided by the sum of the gross interest and scheduled mortgage principal paid to our lenders.

6

- *Nareit EBITDAre* is a measure of REIT performance, which the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("Nareit") defines as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding (i) interest expense, (ii) income tax expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization, (iv) gains on sales of real estate, (v) impairments of real estate, and (vi) adjustments to reflect the Company's share of unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
- *Nareit Funds from Operations ("Nareit FFO")* is a commonly used measure of REIT performance, which Nareit defines as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains on sales and impairments of real estate, net of tax, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We compute Nareit FFO for all periods presented in accordance with Nareit's definition.

Companies use different depreciable lives and methods, and real estate values historically fluctuate with market conditions. Since Nareit FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and gains on sale and impairments of real estate, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in percent leased, rental rates, operating costs, acquisition and development activities, and financing costs. This provides a perspective of our financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP. Thus, Nareit FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of our operating performance, which does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP; and, therefore, should not be considered a substitute measure of cash flows from operations. We provide a reconciliation of Net income attributable to common stockholders to Nareit FFO.

- *Net Operating Income ("NOI")* is the sum of base rent, percentage rent, recoveries from tenants, other lease income, and other property income, less operating and maintenance expenses, real estate taxes, ground rent, and uncollectible lease income. NOI excludes straight-line rental income and expense, above and below market rent and ground rent amortization, tenant lease inducement amortization, and other fees. We also provide disclosure of NOI excluding termination fees, which excludes both termination fee income and expenses.
- *Non-Same Property* is any property, during either calendar year period being compared, that was acquired, sold, a Property in Development, a Development Completion, or a property under, or being positioned for, significant redevelopment that distorts comparability between periods. Non-retail properties and corporate activities, including the captive insurance program, are part of Non-Same Property.
- *Operating EBITDAre* begins with the Nareit EBITDAre and excludes certain non-cash components of earnings derived from above and below market rent amortization and straight-line rents. We provide a reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre to Operating EBITDAre.
- *Pro-rata* information includes 100% of our consolidated properties plus our economic share (based on our ownership interest) in our unconsolidated real estate investment partnerships.

We provide Pro-rata financial information because we believe it assists investors and analysts in estimating our economic interest in our consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships, when read in conjunction with our reported results under GAAP. We believe presenting our Pro-rata share of assets, liabilities, operating results, and other metrics, along with certain other non-GAAP measures, makes comparison of our operating results to those of other REITs more meaningful. The Pro-rata information provided is not, nor is it intended to be, presented in accordance with GAAP. The Pro-rata supplemental details of assets and liabilities and supplemental details of operations reflect our proportionate economic ownership of the assets, liabilities, and operating results of the properties in our portfolio

The Pro-rata information is prepared on a basis consistent with the comparable consolidated amounts and is intended to more accurately reflect our proportionate economic interest in the assets, liabilities, and operating results of properties in our portfolio. We do not control the unconsolidated investment partnerships, and the Pro-rata presentations of the assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses do not represent our legal claim to such items. The partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the operating agreements, which generally provide for such allocations according to their invested capital. Our share of invested capital establishes the ownership interests we use to prepare our Pro-rata share.

7

The presentation of Pro-rata information has limitations which include, but are not limited to, the following:

o The amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage determined when applying the equity method of accounting and do not necessarily represent our legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses; and

o Other companies in our industry may calculate their Pro-rata interest differently, limiting the comparability of Pro-rata information.

Because of these limitations, the Pro-rata financial information should not be considered independently or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP financial statements, using the Pro-rata information as a supplement.

- *Property In Development* includes properties in various stages of ground-up development.
- *Property In Redevelopment* includes Retail Operating Properties under redevelopment or being positioned for redevelopment. Unless otherwise indicated, a Property in Redevelopment is included in the Same Property pool.
- *Redevelopment Completion* is a Property in Redevelopment that is deemed complete upon the earlier of: (i) 90% of total estimated project costs have been incurred and percent leased equals or exceeds 95% for the Company owned GLA related to the project, or (ii) the property features at least two years of anchor operations, if applicable.
- *Retail Operating Property* is any retail property not termed a Property in Development. A retail property is any property where the majority of the income is generated from retail uses.
- *Same Property* is a Retail Operating Property that was owned and operated for the entirety of both calendar year periods being compared. This term excludes Properties in Development, prior year Development Completions, and Non-Same Properties. Properties in Redevelopment are included unless otherwise indicated.

8

# Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those listed below. When considering an investment in our securities, carefully read and consider these risks, together with all other information in our other filings and submissions to the SEC, which provide much more information and detail. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occur, our business, financial condition and/ or operating results, as well as the market price of our securities, could be materially adversely affected.

## Risk Factors Related to the Current Economic Environment

#### **Continued rising interest rates in the current economic environment may adversely impact our cost to borrow, real estate valuation, and stock price.**

On multiple occasions during 2022, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ('the U.S. Federal Reserve') raised its benchmark federal funds rate, which has led to numerous increases in interest rates in the credit markets. The U.S. Federal Reserve may continue to raise the federal funds rate, which will likely lead to higher interest rates in the credit markets. Additionally, U.S. government policies implemented to address inflation, including actions by the U.S. Federal Reserve to increase interest rates, may negatively impact consumer spending, our tenants' businesses, and/or future demand for space in our shopping centers.

Rising interest rates adversely impact our cost of borrowing. Our exposure to increases in interest rates in the short term includes our variable-rate borrowings, which consist of borrowings under our unsecured senior line of credit and variable rate based secured notes payable. Increases in interest rates could increase our financing costs over time, either through near-term borrowings on our floating-rate line of credit or refinancing of our existing borrowings that may incur higher interest expenses related to the issuance of new debt. Prolonged periods of higher interest rates may negatively impact the valuation of our real estate asset portfolio and could result in the decline of our stock price and market capitalization, which may adversely impact our ability and willingness to raise equity capital on favorable terms through sales of our common shares, including through our At the Market ('ATM') program.

Although the extent of any prolonged periods of higher interest rates remains unknown at this time, negative impacts to our cost of capital may also adversely affect our future business plans and growth, at least in the near term.

#### **Current economic challenges, including the potential for recession, may adversely impact our tenants and our business.**

The success of our tenants in operating their businesses and their corresponding ability to pay us rent continue to be significantly impacted by many current economic challenges, which impact their cost of doing business, including, but not limited to, inflation, labor shortages, supply chain constraints, decreasing consumer confidence and discretionary spending, and increasing energy prices and interest rates. Additionally, macroeconomic and geopolitical risks create challenges that may exacerbate current market conditions in the United States, including the potential for a recession.

These economic challenges could adversely impact our volume of leasing activity, which could include tenant move outs and/or higher levels of uncollectible lease income, as well as negatively affect the business and financial results of our tenants. The aggregate impacts of these current economic challenges may also negatively affect the overall market for retail space, resulting in decreased demand for space in our centers. This, in turn, could result in pricing pressure on rent that we are able to charge to new or renewing tenants, such that future rent spreads could be adversely impacted. Further, we may experience higher costs for tenant buildouts, as costs of materials and labor may increase and supply and availability of both may become more limited.

## Risk Factors Related to Pandemics or other Health Crises

#### **Pandemics or other health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect our tenants' financial condition, the profitability of our properties, and our access to the capital markets and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.**

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal, state, and local governments mandated or recommended various actions to reduce or prevent the spread of COVID-19, which altered customer behaviors and temporarily limited many of our tenants' ability to operate. As a result, certain tenants requested rent concessions or sought to renegotiate future rents based on changes to the economic environment. Some tenants chose not to reopen or to honor the terms of their lease agreements. In addition, moratoria and other legal restrictions in certain states impacted our ability to bring legal action to enforce our leases and our ability to collect rent. Should federal, state, and local governments mandate or recommend lockdowns again in the future due to a pandemic or other similar health crises, tenants could request rent concessions or seek to renegotiate future rents.

9

In the event of future pandemics or similar health crises, consumers could elect to make more of their purchases online instead of in physical stores and businesses could delay executing new or renewals of leases amidst the immediate and uncertain economic impacts. These developments, coupled with potential tenant failures and a reduction in newly-formed businesses, could result in decreased demand for retail space in our centers, which could result in lower occupancy or higher levels of uncollectible lease income, as well as downward pressure on rents. Additionally, delays in construction of tenant improvements due to the impacts of constraints on supply chains and labor, resulting from government ordered lockdowns, could result in delayed rent commencement due to it taking longer for new tenants to open and operate.

Although the vast majority of our lease income is derived from contractual rent payments, the ability of certain of our tenants to meet their lease obligations could be negatively impacted by the disruptions and uncertainties of a new virus strain of COVID-19 or any future pandemic or other health crisis. Our tenants' ability to respond to these disruptions and uncertainties, including adjusting to governmental orders and changes in their customers' shopping habits and behaviors, may impact their ability to survive, and ultimately, their ability to comply with their lease obligations. Our future results of operations and overall financial performance could be uncertain should a new virus strain of COVID-19, or future pandemics or other health crises occur.

### **Risk Factors Related to Operating Retail-Based Shopping Centers**

**Economic and market conditions may adversely affect the retail industry and consequently reduce our revenues and cash flow, and increase our operating expenses.**

Our properties are leased primarily to retail tenants from whom we derive most of our revenue in the form of base rent, expense recoveries and other income. Therefore, our performance and operating results are directly linked to the economic and market conditions occurring in the retail industry. We are subject to the risks that, upon expiration, leases for space in our properties are not renewed by existing tenants, vacant space is not leased to new tenants, and/or tenants demand modified lease terms, including costs for renovations or concessions. The economic and market conditions potentially affecting the retail industry and our properties specifically include the following:

- • changes in national, regional and local economic conditions;
- • changes in population and migration patterns to/from the markets in which we operate;
- • deterioration in the competitiveness and creditworthiness of our retail tenants;
- • increased competition from the use of e-commerce by retailers and consumers as well as other concepts that could impact more traditional retail;
- • labor challenges and supply delays and shortages due to a variety of macroeconomic factors, including continuing disruptions to global supply chains as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and inflationary pressures;
- • tenant bankruptcies and subsequent rejections of our leases;
- • reductions in consumer spending and retail sales, including inflationary impacts on consumer behavior;
- • reduced tenant demand for retail space;
- • oversupply of retail space;
- • reduced consumer demand for certain retail categories;
- • consolidation within the retail sector;
- • increased operating costs attendant to owning and operating retail shopping centers;
- • perceptions by retailers and shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of our properties; and
- • other factors which could alter shopping habits or otherwise deter customers from visiting our shopping centers, such as criminal activity, including civil unrest, acts of terrorism, or other types of violent crimes.

To the extent that any or a combination of these conditions occur, they are likely to impact the retail industry, our retail tenants, the emergence of new tenants, the demand for retail space, market rents and rent growth, capital expenditures, the percent leased levels of our properties, the value of our properties, our ability to sell, acquire or develop properties, our operating results and our cash available for distributions to stock and unit holders.

10

**Shifts in retail trends, sales, and delivery methods between brick and mortar stores, e-commerce, home delivery, and curbside pick-up may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations, and cash flows.**

Retailers are increasingly impacted by e-commerce and changes in customer buying habits, including shopping from home and the delivery or curbside pick-up of items ordered online. Retailers are considering these customer buying habits and other trends when making decisions regarding their brick and mortar stores and how they will compete and innovate in a rapidly changing retail environment. Many retailers in our shopping centers provide services or sell goods which have historically been less likely to be purchased online; however, the continuing change in customer buying habits, including increase in e-commerce sales in all retail categories may cause retailers to adjust the size or number of their retail locations in the future or close stores. For example, our grocer tenants are incorporating e-commerce concepts through home delivery and curbside pick-up, which could reduce foot traffic at our centers. These alternative delivery methods are more likely to impact foot traffic at our centers in certain higher-income markets where consumers are willing to pay premiums for such services. Changes in customer buying habits and shopping trends may also impact the profitability and financial condition of retailers that do not adapt to changes in market conditions, and therefore may impact their ability to pay rent. This shift may adversely impact our percent leased and rental rates, which would impact our results of operations and cash flows.

**Changing economic and retail market conditions in geographic areas where our properties are concentrated may reduce our revenues and cash flow.**

Economic conditions in markets where our properties are concentrated can greatly influence our financial performance. Our properties in California and Florida represent 26.0% and 21.3%, respectively, of our annualized base rent. Our revenues and cash flow may be adversely affected by this geographic concentration if market conditions, such as supply of or demand for retail space, deteriorate more significantly in these states compared to other geographic areas. Additionally, there is a risk that businesses and residents in major metropolitan cities may relocate to different states or suburban markets.

**Our success depends on the continued presence and success of our "anchor" tenants.**

"Anchor Tenants" (tenants occupying 10,000 square feet or more) operate large stores in our shopping centers, pay a significant portion of the total rent at a property and contribute to the attraction and success of other tenants by drawing shoppers to the property. Our net income and cash flow may be adversely affected by the loss of revenues and incurrence of additional costs in the event a significant Anchor Tenant:

- becomes bankrupt or insolvent;
- experiences a downturn in its business;
- shifts its capital allocation away from brick and mortar formats;
- materially defaults on its leases;
- does not renew its leases as they expire;
- renews at lower rental rates and/or requires a tenant improvement allowance; or
- renews but reduces its store size, which results in down-time and additional tenant improvement costs to the landlord to re-lease the vacated space.

Some anchors have the right to vacate their space and may prevent us from re-tenanting by continuing to comply and pay rent in accordance with their lease agreement. Vacated "Anchor Space" (spaces 10,000 square feet or more), including space that may be owned by the anchor (as discussed below), can reduce rental revenues generated by the shopping center in other spaces because of the loss of the departed anchor's customer drawing power. In addition, if a significant tenant vacates a property, so-called "co-tenancy clauses" in select leases may allow other tenants to modify or terminate their rent payment or other lease obligations. Co-tenancy clauses have several variants: they may allow a tenant to postpone a store opening if certain other tenants fail to open their stores; they may allow a tenant to close its store prior to lease expiration if another tenant closes its store prior to lease expiration; or more commonly, they may allow a tenant to pay reduced levels of rent until a certain number of tenants open their stores within the same shopping center.

Additionally, some of our shopping centers are anchored by retailers who own their space in a location that is within or immediately adjacent to our shopping center ("shadow anchors"). In those cases, the shadow anchors appear to the consumer as a retail tenant of the shopping center and, as a result, attract additional consumer traffic to the center. In the event that a shadow Anchor Space becomes vacant, it could negatively impact our center as consumer traffic would likely be reduced.

11

**A percentage of our revenues are derived from 'local' tenants and our net income may be adversely impacted if these tenants are not successful, or if the demand for the types or mix of tenants significantly change.**

At December 31, 2022, tenants with less than three locations ('Local Tenants') represent approximately 22% of annualized base rent. Local Tenants vary from retail shops and restaurants to service providers. These Local Tenants may be more vulnerable to negative economic conditions and changing customer buying habits and retail trends as they may have more limited resources and access to capital than other tenants. As such, in the event of such changing conditions, habits and trends, they may suffer disproportionately greater impacts and be at greater risk of lease default than other tenants.

**We may be unable to collect balances due from tenants in bankruptcy.**

Although lease income is supported by long-term lease contracts, tenants who file for bankruptcy have the legal right to reject any or all of their leases and close related stores. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt tenant for unpaid rent may be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold. Additionally, we may incur significant expense to recover our claim and to re-lease the vacated space. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases, we may experience a significant reduction in our revenues and may not be able to collect all pre-petition amounts owed by the bankrupt tenant.

**Many of our costs and expenses associated with operating our properties may remain constant or increase, even if our lease income decreases.**

Certain costs and expenses associated with our operating our properties, such as real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and common area expenses, generally do not decrease in the event of reduced occupancy or rental rates, non-payment of rents by tenants, general economic downturns, pandemics or other similar circumstances. In fact, in some cases, such as real estate taxes and insurance, they may actually increase despite such events. As such, we may not be able to lower the operating expenses of our properties sufficiently to fully offset such circumstances and may not be able to fully recoup these costs from our tenants. In such cases, our cash flows, operating results and financial performance may be adversely impacted.

**Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other building, fire, and safety regulations may have a material negative effect on us.**

All of our properties are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act ('ADA'), which generally requires that buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with ADA requirements may require removal of access barriers, and noncompliance may result in imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. While the tenants to whom we lease space in our properties are obligated by law to comply with the ADA provisions, and typically under tenant leases are obligated to cover costs associated with compliance, if required changes involve greater expenditures than anticipated, or if the changes must be made on a more accelerated basis than anticipated, the ability of these tenants to cover costs may be adversely affected. In addition, we are required to operate the properties in compliance with fire and safety regulations and building codes as they may be adopted by governmental entities and become applicable to the properties. Costs to be in compliance with the ADA or any other building, fire, and safety regulations could have a material negative impact on our results of operations.

### **Risk Factors Related to Real Estate Investments**

**Our real estate assets may decline in value and be subject to impairment losses which may reduce our net income.**

Our real estate properties are carried at cost unless circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable which may result in impairment. We evaluate whether there are any indicators, including declines in property operating performance and general market conditions, such that the value of the real estate properties (including any related tangible or intangible assets or liabilities, including goodwill) may not be recoverable and therefore may be impaired. Our evaluation includes several key assumptions, including rental rates, costs of tenant improvements, leasing commissions, anticipated holding periods, and assumptions regarding the residual value upon disposition, including the exit capitalization rate. These key assumptions are subjective in nature and may differ materially from actual results. Changes in our investment, redevelopment, and disposition strategies or changes in the market where an asset is located may alter management's intended holding period of an asset or asset group, which may result in an impairment loss and such loss may be material to our financial condition or operating performance.

12

The fair value of real estate assets is subjective and is determined through the use of comparable sales information and other market data if available, or through use of an income approach such as the direct capitalization method or the discounted cash flow approach. Such cash flow projections take into account expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other relevant criteria, and therefore are subject to management judgment. In estimating the fair value of undeveloped land, we generally use market data and comparable sales information.

These subjective assessments have a direct impact on our net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income, which may be material. There can be no assurance that we will not record impairment charges in the future related to our assets.

#### **We face risks associated with development, redevelopment, and expansion of properties.**

We actively pursue opportunities for new retail development and existing property redevelopment and/or expansion. Development and redevelopment activities require various government and other approvals for entitlements, and any delay in such approvals may significantly delay development and redevelopment projects. We may not recover our investment in our projects for which approvals are not received, and delays may adversely impact our expected returns. Additionally, changes in political elections and policies may impact our ability to obtain favorable land use and zoning for in-process and future developments and redevelopment projects. We are subject to other risks associated with these activities, including the following:

- we may be unable to lease developments or redevelopments to full occupancy on a timely basis;
- the occupancy rates and rents of a completed project may not be sufficient to make the project profitable, or not profitable enough to meet our investment return expectations;
- actual costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project unprofitable, or not profitable enough to meet our investment return expectations;
- delays in the development or construction process may increase our costs;
- construction cost increases may reduce investment returns on development and redevelopment opportunities;
- we may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities and lose our investment due to adverse market conditions;
- the size of our development and redevelopment pipeline may strain our labor or capital capacity to complete the development and redevelopment projects within targeted timelines and may reduce our investment returns;
- a reduction in the demand for new retail space may reduce our future development and redevelopment activities, which in turn may reduce our NOI; and
- changes in the level of future development and redevelopment activity may adversely impact our results of operations by reducing the amount of internal overhead costs that may be capitalized.

#### **We face risks associated with the development of mixed-use commercial properties.**

If we engage in more complex acquisitions and mixed-use development and redevelopment projects, there could be more unique risks to our return on investment. Mixed-use projects refer to real estate projects that, in addition to retail space, may also include space for residential, office, hotel or other commercial purposes. We have less experience in developing and managing non-retail real estate than we do retail real estate. As a result, if a development or redevelopment project includes a non-retail use, we may seek to develop that component ourselves, sell the rights to that component to a third-party developer, or partner with a developer.

- If we decide to develop the non-retail components ourselves, we would be exposed not only to those risks typically associated with the development of commercial real estate, but also to risks associated with developing, owning, operating or selling non-retail real estate, including but not limited to more complex entitlement processes and multiple-story buildings. These unique risks may adversely impact our return on investment in these mixed-use development projects.
- If we sell the non-retail components, our retail component will be impacted by the decisions made by the other owners, and actions of those occupying the non-retail spaces in these mixed-use properties.
- If we partner with a developer, it makes us dependent upon the partner's ability to perform and to agree on major decisions that impact our investment returns of the project. In addition, there is a risk that the non-retail developer may default on its obligations necessitating that we complete the other components ourselves, including providing necessary financing.

13

### **We face risks associated with the acquisition of properties.**

Our investment strategy includes investing in high-quality shopping centers that are leased to market-leading grocers, category-leading anchors, specialty retailers, and/or restaurants located in areas with above average household incomes and population densities. The acquisition of properties and/or real estate entities entails risks that include, but are not limited to, the following, any of which may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows:

- properties we acquire may fail to achieve the occupancy or rental rates we project, within the time frames we estimate, which may result in the properties' failure to achieve the investment returns we project;
- our investigation of an entity, property or building prior to our acquisition, and any representation we may have received from such seller, may fail to reveal various liabilities including defects, necessary repairs or environmental matters requiring corrective action, which may increase our costs;
- our estimate of the costs to improve, reposition or redevelop a property may prove to be too low, or the time we estimate to complete the improvement, repositioning or redevelopment may be too short, either of which may result in the property failing to achieve our projected return, either temporarily or permanently;
- we may not recover our costs from an unsuccessful acquisition;
- our acquisition activities may distract or strain our management capacity; and
- we may not be able to successfully integrate an acquisition into our existing operations platform.

### **We may be unable to sell properties when desired because of market conditions.**

Our properties, including their related tangible and intangible assets, represent the majority of our total consolidated assets and they may not be readily convertible to cash. Macro-economic events, pandemics and other health crises may impact our ability to sell properties on our preferred timing and at prices and returns we deem acceptable. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties, including properties held in joint ventures, in response to changes in economic, industry, financial market, or other conditions may be limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability and terms of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand for space, that are beyond our control. There may be less demand for lower quality properties that we have identified for ultimate disposition in markets with uncertain economic or retail environments, and where buyers are more reliant on the availability of third party mortgage financing. If we want to sell a property, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or at all or that the sales price of a property will be attractive at the relevant time or even exceed the carrying value of our investment.

### **Changes in tax laws could impact our acquisition or disposition of real estate.**

Certain properties we own have a low tax basis, which may result in a meaningful taxable gain on sale. We utilize, and intend to continue to utilize, Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 like-kind exchanges to tax-efficiently buy and sell properties; however, there can be no assurance that we will identify properties that meet our investment objectives for acquisitions or that changes to the tax laws do not eliminate the benefits of effectuating 1031 exchanges, or significantly change the requirements for a transaction to qualify for 1031 exchange treatment. In the event that we cannot or do not utilize 1031 exchanges, we may be required to distribute the gain proceeds to shareholders or pay income tax, which may reduce our cash flow available to fund our commitments or other priorities.

14

# Risk Factors Related to the Environment Affecting Our Properties

**Climate change may adversely impact our properties directly and may lead to additional compliance obligations and costs as well as additional taxes and fees.**

While we work with experts in the field to plan for the potential impacts of climate change on our business, we cannot reliably predict the extent, rate, timing, or impact of climate change. To the extent climate change causes adverse changes in weather patterns, our properties in certain markets, especially those nearer to the coasts, may experience increases in storm frequency and intensity and rising sea-levels. Further, population migration may occur in response to these or other factors and negatively impact our centers. For example, climate and other environmental changes may result in volatile or decreased demand for retail space at certain of our properties, reduced rent or, in extreme cases, our inability to operate certain properties at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of insurance or making insurance unavailable. Moreover, while the federal government has not yet enacted comprehensive legislation to address climate change, certain states in which we own and operate shopping centers, including California and New York, have done so. Compliance with these and future new laws or regulations related to climate change may require us to make additional investments in or for our existing properties, resulting in increased capital expenditures and operating costs, implement new or additional processes and controls to facilitate compliance, and/or pay additional energy, insurance, taxes and related fees and costs. At this time, there can be no assurance that we can anticipate all potential material impacts of climate change, or that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on the value of our properties and our financial performance in the future.

**Geographic concentration of our properties makes our business more vulnerable to natural disasters, severe weather conditions and climate change.**

A significant number of our properties are located in areas that are susceptible to earthquakes, tropical storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, sea-level rise, and other natural disasters. At December 31, 2022, 20.6% of the GLA of our portfolio is located in the state of California, including a number of properties in the San Francisco Bay and Los Angeles areas. Additionally, 22.4% and 7.8% of the GLA of our portfolio is located in the states of Florida and Texas, respectively. Insurance costs for properties in these areas have increased, and recent intense weather conditions may cause property insurance premiums to increase significantly in the future. We recognize that the frequency and / or intensity of extreme weather events, and other climatic changes may continue to increase, and as a result, our exposure to these events may increase. These weather conditions may disrupt our business and the business of our tenants, which may affect the ability of some tenants to pay rent and may reduce the willingness of tenants or residents to remain in or move to these affected areas. Therefore, as a result of the geographic concentration of our properties, we face risks, including disruptions to our business and the businesses of our tenants and higher costs, such as uninsured property losses, higher insurance premiums, and potential additional regulatory requirements by government agencies in response to perceived risks.

**Costs of environmental remediation may adversely impact our financial performance and reduce our cash flow.**

Under various federal, state, and local laws, an owner or manager of real property may be liable for the costs to assess and remediate the presence of hazardous substances on the property, which in our case most typically arise from current or former dry cleaners, gas stations, asbestos usage, and historic land use practices. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous substances, which may adversely impact our financial performance and reduce our cash flow. The presence of, or the failure to properly address the presence of, hazardous substances may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. We can provide no assurance that we are aware of all potential environmental liabilities or their ultimate cost to address; that our properties will not be affected by tenants or nearby properties or other unrelated third parties; and that future uses or conditions, or changes in environmental laws and regulations, or their interpretation, will not result in additional material environmental liabilities to us.

15

# Risk Factors Related to Corporate Matters

**An increased focus on metrics and reporting related to environmental, social and governance ('ESG') factors, may impose additional costs and expose us to new risks.**

Investors have become more focused on understanding how companies address a variety of ESG factors. As they evaluate investment decisions, many investors look not only at company disclosures but also to ESG rating systems that have been developed by third parties to allow ESG comparisons between companies. Although we participate in a number of these ratings systems, we do not participate in all such systems, and may not score as well in all of the available ratings systems as other REITs and real estate operators. Further, the criteria used in these ratings systems may conflict with each other and change frequently, and we cannot guaranty that we will be able to score well in the future. We supplement our participation in ratings systems with published disclosures of our ESG activities, but some investors may desire other disclosures that we do not provide. In addition, as noted above, the SEC is currently evaluating potential new regulations that could impose additional ESG disclosure and other compliance requirements on us. Failure to participate in certain of the third party ratings systems, failure to score well in those ratings systems or failure to provide certain ESG disclosures could adversely impact us when investors compare us against similar companies in our industry, and could cause certain investors to be unwilling to invest in our stock, which could adversely impact our stock price and our ability to raise capital.

**An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds the insurance coverage on our properties may subject us to loss of capital and revenue on those properties.**

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, flood, terrorism, business interruption, and environmental insurance for our properties. Some types of losses, such as losses from named windstorms, earthquakes, terrorism, or wars may have more limited coverage, or in some cases, can be excluded from insurance coverage. In addition, it is possible that the availability of insurance coverage in certain areas may decrease in the future, and the cost to procure such insurance may increase due to factors beyond our control. We may reduce the insurance we procure as a result of the foregoing or other factors. Should a loss occur at any of our properties that is in excess of the property or casualty insurance limits of our policies, we may lose part or all of our invested capital and revenues from such property, which may have a material adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition, and our ability to make distributions to stock and unit holders.

Terrorist activities or violence occurring at our properties also may directly affect the value of our properties through damage, destruction or loss. Insurance for such acts may be unavailable or cost more resulting in an increase to our operating expenses and adversely affect our results of operations. To the extent that our tenants are affected by such attacks and threats of violence, their businesses may be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to meet obligations under their existing leases.

**Failure to attract and retain key personnel may adversely affect our business and operations.**

The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and other key personnel, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented and diverse employees may significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot be assured that we will retain all of our executive management team and other key personnel or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals for these positions in the future. Losing any key personnel may have an adverse effect on us.

16

**The unauthorized access, use, theft or destruction of tenant or employee personal, financial, or other data or of Regency's proprietary or confidential information stored in our information systems or by third parties on our behalf could impact our reputation and brand and expose us to potential liability and loss of revenues.**

Many of our information technology systems (including those we use for administration, accounting, and communications, as well as the systems of our co-investment partners and other third-party business partners and service providers, whether cloud-based or hosted in proprietary servers) contain personal, financial or other information that is entrusted to us by our tenants and employees. Many of our information technology systems also contain our proprietary information and other confidential information related to our business. We are frequently subject to attempts to compromise our information technology systems. To the extent we or a third party were to experience a material breach of our or such third party's information technology systems that results in the unauthorized access, theft, use, destruction or other compromises of tenants' or employees' data or our confidential information stored in such systems, including through cyber-attacks or other external or internal methods, such a breach may damage our reputation and cause us to lose tenants, employees, and revenues, incur third party claims and cause disruption to our business and plans. Additionally, a successful ransomware attack, denial of service, or other impactful type of cyber-attack may occur. Despite planning, preparation, and preventative measures, such attacks may be successful and our business may be significantly disrupted if unable to quickly recover. Such security breaches also could result in a violation of applicable U.S. privacy and other laws, and subject us to private consumer, business partner, or securities litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings, any of which could result in our exposure to material civil or criminal liability, and we may not be able to recover these expenses from our service providers, responsible parties, or insurance carriers. Despite the ongoing significant investments in technology and training we make in cybersecurity, we can provide no assurance that we will avoid or prevent such breaches or attacks.

Additionally, federal, state and local authorities continue to develop laws to address data privacy protection. Monitoring such changes, and taking steps to comply, involves significant costs and effort by management, which may adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

Despite the implementation of security measures for our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, our systems are vulnerable to damage from multiple sources other than cybersecurity risks, including computer viruses, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication failure. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business and cause us to incur additional costs to remedy such damages.

#### **Risk Factors Related to Our Partnerships and Joint Ventures**

**We do not have voting control over all of the properties owned in our co-investment partnerships and joint ventures, so we are unable to ensure that our objectives will be pursued.**

We have invested substantial capital as a partner in a number of partnerships and joint ventures to acquire, own, lease, develop or redevelop properties. These activities are subject to the same risks as our investments in our wholly-owned properties. However, these investments, and other future similar investments may involve risks that would not be present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or other owners might become bankrupt, suffer a deterioration in their creditworthiness, or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Partners or other owners may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our own business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.

These investments, and other future similar investments, also have the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, such as a sale or financing, because neither we nor our partner or other owner has full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or other owners might result in a premature termination of the applicable partnership or joint venture, or potentially litigation or arbitration, that may increase our investment and related risk as well as our costs and expenses associated with the investment, and distract management from sufficiently focusing their time and efforts on others areas of our business. In addition, we risk the possibility of being held liable for the actions of our partners or other owners. These factors may limit the return that we receive from such investments or cause our cash flows to be lower than our estimates.

**The termination of our partnerships may adversely affect our cash flow, operating results, and our ability to make distributions to stock and unit holders.**

If partnerships owning a significant number of properties were dissolved for any reason, we could lose the asset, property management, leasing and construction management fees from these partnerships as well as the operating income of the properties, which may adversely affect our operating results and our cash available for distribution to stock and unit holders. Certain of our partnership operating agreements provide either member the ability to elect buy/sell clauses. The election of these dissolution provisions could require us to invest additional capital to acquire the partners' interest or to sell our share of the property thereby losing the operating income and cash flow.

17

# Risk Factors Related to Funding Strategies and Capital Structure

**Our ability to sell properties and fund acquisitions and developments may be adversely impacted by higher market capitalization rates and lower NOI at our properties which may dilute earnings.**

As part of our funding strategy, we sell properties that no longer meet our strategic objectives or investment standards and/or those with a limited future growth profile. These sales proceeds are used to fund debt repayment, acquisition of other properties, and new developments and redevelopments. An increase in market capitalization rates (which may or may not be driven by an increase in interest rates) or a decline in NOI may cause a reduction in the value of centers identified for sale, which would have an adverse impact on the amount of cash generated. Additionally, the sale of properties resulting in significant tax gains may require higher distributions to our stockholders or payment of additional income taxes in order to maintain our REIT status.

**We depend on external sources of capital, which may not be available in the future on favorable terms or at all.**

To qualify as a REIT, the Parent Company must, among other things, distribute to its stockholders each year at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding any net capital gains). Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs with income from operations. In such instances, we would rely on third-party sources of capital, which may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market's perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings. Our access to debt depends on our credit rating, the willingness of creditors to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. In addition to finding lenders willing to lend to us, we are dependent upon our joint venture partners to contribute their pro rata share of any amount needed to repay or refinance existing debt when lenders reduce the amount of debt our partnerships and joint ventures are eligible to refinance.

In addition, our existing debt arrangements also impose covenants that limit our flexibility in obtaining other financing. Additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of stockholders' interests and additional debt financing may substantially increase our degree of leverage.

Without access to external sources of capital, we would be required to pay outstanding debt with our operating cash flows and proceeds from property sales. Our operating cash flows may not be sufficient to pay our outstanding debt as it comes due and real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly at a return we believe is appropriate. If we are required to deleverage our business with operating cash flows and proceeds from property sales, we may be forced to reduce the amount of, or eliminate altogether, our distributions to stock and unit holders or refrain from making investments in our business.

**Our debt financing may adversely affect our business and financial condition.**

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our indebtedness will depend primarily on our future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. In addition, we do not expect to generate sufficient operating cash flow to make balloon principal payments on our debt when due. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be forced (i) to dispose of properties, which might result in losses, or (ii) to obtain financing at unfavorable terms, either of which may reduce the cash flow available for distributions to stock and unit holders. If we cannot make required mortgage loan payments, the mortgagee may foreclose on the property securing the mortgage.

**Covenants in our debt agreements may restrict our operating activities and adversely affect our financial condition.**

Our unsecured notes and unsecured line of credit (the 'Line') contain customary covenants, including compliance with financial ratios, such as ratio of indebtedness to total asset value and fixed charge coverage ratio. These covenants may limit our operational flexibility and our investment activities. Moreover, if we breach any of the covenants in our debt agreements, and do not cure the breach within the applicable cure period, our lenders may require us to repay the debt immediately, even in the absence of a payment default. Many of our debt arrangements, including our unsecured notes and the Line, are cross-defaulted, which means that the lenders under those debt arrangements can require immediate repayment of their debt if we breach and fail to cure a default under certain of our other material debt obligations. As a result, any default under our debt covenants may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our results of operations, our ability to meet our obligations, and the market value of our stock.

**Increases in interest rates would cause our borrowing costs to rise and negatively impact our results of operations.**

Although a significant amount of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates, we do borrow funds at variable interest rates under our credit facility, term loan, and certain secured borrowings. As of December 31, 2022, less than 1.0% of our outstanding debt was variable rate debt not hedged to fixed rate debt. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense on any variable rate debt to the extent we have not hedged our exposure to changes in interest rates. In addition, increases in interest rates will affect the terms under which we refinance our existing debt as it matures, to the extent we have not hedged our exposure to changes in interest rates. This would reduce our future earnings and cash flows, which may adversely affect our ability to service our debt and meet our other obligations and also may reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our stock and unit holders.

18

**Hedging activity may expose us to risks, including the risks that a counterparty will not perform and that the hedge will not yield the economic benefits we anticipate, which may adversely affect us.**

We manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements. These arrangements involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. There can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify for hedge accounting or that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. Should we desire to terminate a hedging arrangement, there may be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligations under the hedging arrangement. In addition, failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

### **Risk Factors Related to the Market Price for Our Securities**

**Changes in economic and market conditions may adversely affect the market price of our securities.**

The market price of our debt and equity securities may fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, many of which are out of our control, including:

- • actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;
- • changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates;
- • publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry in general and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other REITs;
- • the ability of our tenants to pay rent and meet their other obligations to us under current lease terms and our ability to re-lease space as leases expire;
- • increases in market interest rates that drive investors in, or potential purchasers of, our stock to seek other investments or demand a higher dividend yield;
- • changes in market valuations of similar companies;
- • adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future;
- • any future issuances of equity securities;
- • additions or departures of key management personnel;
- • strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
- • actions by institutional stockholders;
- • reports by corporate governance rating companies;
- • increased investor focus on sustainability-related risks, including climate change;
- • changes in our dividend payments;
- • potential tax law changes relating to REITs;
- • speculation in the press or investment community; and
- • general market and economic conditions.

These factors may cause the market price of our securities to decline, regardless of our financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects. It is impossible to ensure that the market price of our securities, including our common stock, will not fall in the future. A decrease in the market price of our common stock may reduce our ability to raise additional equity capital in the public markets. Selling common stock at a decreased market price would have a dilutive impact on existing stockholders.

19

# **There is no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends at current or historical rates.**

Our ability to continue to pay dividends at current or historical rates or to increase our dividend rate will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, the following:

- our ability to acquire, finance, develop or redevelop and lease additional properties at attractive rates.

If we do not maintain or periodically increase the dividend on our common stock, it may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and other securities.

# **Risk Factors Related to the Company's Qualification as a REIT**

# **If the Parent Company fails to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates.**

We believe that the Parent Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and we plan to operate so that the Parent Company can continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. If the Parent Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. Many REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. The determination that the Parent Company is a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances, some of which may not be totally within our control and some of which involve questions of interpretation. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, like rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service ('IRS') or a court would agree with the positions we have taken in interpreting the REIT requirements. The Parent Company is also required to distribute to the stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. The Parent Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on undistributed taxable income and net capital gains and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions the Parent Company pays with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. The fact that we hold many of our assets through co-investment partnerships and their subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult for the Parent Company to remain qualified as a REIT.

Also, unless the IRS granted relief under certain statutory provisions, the Parent Company would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year it first failed to qualify. If the Parent Company failed to qualify as a REIT (currently and/or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), the Parent Company would have to pay significant income taxes, reducing cash available to pay dividends, which would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to pay any dividends to stockholders in order to maintain our REIT status. Although we believe that the Parent Company qualifies as a REIT, we cannot be assured that the Parent Company will continue to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes.

Even if the Parent Company qualifies as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Parent Company is required to pay certain federal, state, and local taxes on its income and property. For example, if we have net income from 'prohibited transactions,' that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions include sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The determination as to whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale. While we have undertaken a significant number of asset sales in recent years, we do not believe that those sales should be considered prohibited transactions, but there can be no assurance that the IRS would not contend otherwise.

New legislation, as well as new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions may be introduced, enacted, or promulgated from time to time, that may change the tax laws or interpretations of the tax laws regarding qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification, in a manner that is adverse to our stockholders.

20

### **Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.**

Subject to limited exceptions, dividends paid by REITs (other than distributions designated as capital gain dividends, qualified dividends or returns of capital) are not eligible for reduced rates for qualified dividends paid by 'C' corporations and are taxable at ordinary income tax rates. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the 'TCJA'), however, domestic shareholders that are individuals, trusts, and estates generally may deduct up to 20% of the ordinary dividends (e.g., dividends not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) received from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 3, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which may adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of the Parent Company's capital stock.

### **Certain foreign stockholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain recognized on a disposition of our common stock if we do not qualify as a 'domestically controlled' REIT.**

A foreign person, other than a 'qualified shareholder' or a 'qualified foreign pension fund,' as each is defined for purposes of the Code, disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain recognized on the disposition. This tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is 'domestically controlled.' In general, the Parent Company will be a domestically controlled REIT if at all times during the five-year period ending on the applicable stockholder's disposition of our stock, less than 50% in value of our stock was held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. If the Parent Company were to fail to qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, gain recognized by a foreign stockholder on a disposition of our common stock would be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign stockholder did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock.

We seek to act in the best interests of the Parent Company as a whole and do not take into consideration the particular tax consequences to any specific holder of our stock. Foreign persons should inform themselves as to the U.S. tax consequences, and the tax consequences within the countries of their citizenship, residence, domicile, and place of business, with respect to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of shares of our common stock.

### **Legislative or other actions affecting REITs may have a negative effect on us or our investors.**

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, may adversely affect the Parent Company or our investors. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect the Parent Company or our investors. New legislation, Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, or the federal income tax consequences of an investment in us. There is also a risk that REIT status may be adversely impacted by a change in tax or other laws. Also, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, may change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT.

### **Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.**

The REIT provisions of the Code limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Generally, income from a hedging transaction does not constitute 'gross income' for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests, provided that we properly identify the hedging transaction pursuant to the applicable sections of the Code and Treasury Regulations. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, or fail to make the proper tax identifications, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of otherwise advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS.

### **Risk Factors Related to the Company's Common Stock**

#### **Restrictions on the ownership of the Parent Company's capital stock to preserve its REIT status may delay or prevent a change in control.**

Ownership of more than 7% by value of our outstanding capital stock is prohibited, with certain exceptions, by the Parent Company's articles of incorporation, for the purpose of maintaining its qualification as a REIT. This 7% limitation may discourage a change in control and may also (i) deter tender offers for our capital stock, which offers may be attractive to our stockholders, or (ii) limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their capital stock that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to assemble a block in excess of 7% of our outstanding capital stock or to affect a change in control.

21

# **The issuance of the Parent Company's capital stock may delay or prevent a change in control.**

The Parent Company's articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 10,000,000 shares of special common stock and to establish the preferences and rights of any shares issued. The issuance of preferred stock or special common stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. The provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act regarding affiliated transactions may also deter potential acquisitions by preventing the acquiring party from consummating a merger or other extraordinary corporate transaction without the approval of our disinterested stockholders.

# **Ownership in the Parent Company may be diluted in the future.**

In the future, a stockholder's percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or other corporate purposes, including equity awards we will grant to our directors, officers and employees. In the past we have issued equity in the secondary market and may do so again in the future, depending on the price of our stock and other factors.

In addition, our restated articles of incorporation, as amended, authorizes our Board of Directors to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such preferences, limitations, and relative rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our Board of Directors generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock. For example, we could grant the holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of our directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock.

# **Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments**

None.

22

## Item 2. Properties

The following table is a list of our shopping centers, summarized by state and in order of largest holdings by number of properties, presented for consolidated properties (excludes properties owned by unconsolidated co-investment partnerships):

| Location | December 31, 2022 |  |  |  | December 31, 2021 |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Number of Properties | GLA (in thousands) | Percent of Total GLA | Percent Leased | Number of Properties | GLA (in thousands) | Percent of Total GLA | Percent Leased |
| Florida | 88 | 10,783 | 27.8% | 95.1% | 89 | 10,771 | 28.4% | 93.7% |
| California | 53 | 8,204 | 21.1% | 93.9% | 53 | 8,219 | 21.7% | 93.2% |
| Texas | 25 | 3,239 | 8.3% | 98.0% | 25 | 3,240 | 8.5% | 96.0% |
| Georgia | 22 | 2,120 | 5.5% | 92.9% | 22 | 2,127 | 5.6% | 91.1% |
| New York | 16 | 1,953 | 5.0% | 89.0% | 15 | 1,749 | 4.6% | 92.9% |
| Connecticut | 14 | 1,452 | 3.7% | 91.1% | 14 | 1,464 | 3.9% | 94.4% |
| Colorado | 13 | 1,097 | 2.8% | 96.6% | 13 | 1,096 | 2.9% | 95.8% |
| North Carolina | 10 | 1,222 | 3.2% | 98.2% | 10 | 1,221 | 3.2% | 96.2% |
| Washington | 10 | 963 | 2.5% | 97.3% | 9 | 857 | 2.3% | 96.5% |
| Ohio | 8 | 1,224 | 3.2% | 96.7% | 8 | 1,215 | 3.2% | 98.3% |
| Massachusetts | 8 | 897 | 2.3% | 97.6% | 8 | 898 | 2.4% | 95.1% |
| Oregon | 7 | 742 | 1.9% | 94.6% | 7 | 741 | 2.0% | 94.5% |
| Illinois | 6 | 1,085 | 2.8% | 94.9% | 6 | 1,085 | 2.9% | 94.8% |
| Virginia | 6 | 939 | 2.4% | 93.4% | 6 | 939 | 2.5% | 90.8% |
| Pennsylvania | 4 | 443 | 1.1% | 98.7% | 3 | 326 | 0.9% | 97.1% |
| Missouri | 4 | 408 | 1.1% | 99.5% | 4 | 408 | 1.1% | 100.0% |
| Tennessee | 3 | 314 | 0.8% | 99.1% | 3 | 314 | 0.8% | 98.3% |
| New Jersey | 2 | 573 | 1.5% | 89.2% | 1 | 219 | 0.6% | 98.1% |
| Maryland | 2 | 250 | 0.6% | 94.4% | 2 | 320 | 0.8% | 82.0% |
| Minnesota | 2 | 246 | 0.6% | 100.0% | - | - | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Indiana | 1 | 279 | 0.7% | 100.0% | 1 | 279 | 0.7% | 100.0% |
| Delaware | 1 | 230 | 0.6% | 94.5% | 1 | 228 | 0.6% | 93.2% |
| Michigan | 1 | 97 | 0.3% | 74.0% | 1 | 97 | 0.3% | 74.0% |
| South Carolina | 1 | 51 | 0.1% | 100.0% | 1 | 51 | 0.1% | 100.0% |
| District of Columbia | 1 | 23 | 0.1% | 85.8% | - | - | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total | 308 | 38,834 | 100.0% | 94.8% | 302 | 37,864 | 100.0% | 94.0% |

The weighted average annual effective rent for the consolidated portfolio of properties, net of tenant concessions, is $23.95 and $23.17 per square foot ('PSF') as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

23

The following table is a list of our shopping centers, summarized by state and in order of largest holdings by number of properties, presented for unconsolidated properties (properties owned by our unconsolidated co-investment partnerships):

| Location | December 31, 2022 |  |  |  | December 31, 2021 |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Number of Properties | GLA (in thousands) | Percent of Total GLA | Percent Leased | Number of Properties | GLA (in thousands) | Percent of Total GLA | Percent Leased |
| California | 17 | 2,320 | 18.9% | 97.4% | 18 | 2,644 | 19.9% | 91.9% |
| Virginia | 15 | 2,082 | 16.9% | 93.9% | 15 | 2,082 | 15.7% | 93.7% |
| Maryland | 9 | 849 | 6.9% | 96.3% | 10 | 1,069 | 8.0% | 94.9% |
| North Carolina | 7 | 1,197 | 9.7% | 95.5% | 8 | 1,270 | 9.5% | 96.1% |
| Washington | 7 | 874 | 7.1% | 97.4% | 7 | 874 | 6.6% | 98.4% |
| Colorado | 6 | 858 | 7.0% | 93.3% | 6 | 851 | 6.4% | 90.8% |
| Pennsylvania | 6 | 669 | 5.4% | 84.5% | 6 | 669 | 5.0% | 84.6% |
| Florida | 6 | 663 | 5.4% | 99.4% | 7 | 811 | 6.1% | 97.4% |
| Texas | 5 | 742 | 6.0% | 94.4% | 5 | 691 | 5.2% | 95.5% |
| Illinois | 4 | 690 | 5.6% | 91.9% | 3 | 575 | 4.3% | 97.4% |
| Minnesota | 3 | 423 | 3.4% | 98.3% | 5 | 668 | 5.0% | 97.5% |
| New Jersey | 3 | 224 | 1.8% | 81.8% | 4 | 353 | 2.7% | 92.6% |
| Indiana | 2 | 139 | 1.1% | 82.9% | 2 | 139 | 1.0% | 75.8% |
| Connecticut | 1 | 186 | 1.5% | 98.1% | 1 | 186 | 1.4% | 96.4% |
| New York | 1 | 141 | 1.2% | 100.0% | 1 | 141 | 1.1% | 100.0% |
| Oregon | 1 | 93 | 0.8% | 97.7% | 1 | 93 | 0.7% | 100.0% |
| South Carolina | 1 | 80 | 0.7% | 96.7% | 1 | 80 | 0.6% | 100.0% |
| Delaware | 1 | 64 | 0.5% | 100.0% | 1 | 64 | 0.5% | 89.7% |
| District of Columbia | 1 | 17 | 0.1% | 100.0% | 2 | 40 | 0.3% | 91.8% |
| Total | 96 | 12,311 | 100.0% | 94.8% | 103 | 13,300 | 100.0% | 93.9% |

The weighted average annual effective rent for the unconsolidated portfolio of properties, net of tenant concessions, is $23.15 and $22.37 PSF as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

24

The following table summarizes our top tenants occupying our shopping centers for consolidated properties plus our Pro-rata share of unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2022, based upon a percentage of total annualized base rent (GLA and dollars in thousands):

| Tenant | GLA | Percent of Company Owned GLA | Annualized Base Rent | Percent of Annualized Base Rent | Number of Leased Stores |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Publix | 2,876 | 7.0% | $31,679 | 3.2% | 67 |
| Kroger Co. | 2,987 | 7.3% | 30,438 | 3.1% | 53 |
| Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 1,920 | 4.7% | 29,144 | 3.0% | 46 |
| Amazon/Whole Foods | 1,185 | 2.9% | 25,756 | 2.6% | 36 |
| TJX Companies, Inc. | 1,457 | 3.6% | 25,129 | 2.6% | 63 |
| CVS | 663 | 1.6% | 15,606 | 1.6% | 56 |
| Ahold Delhaize | 473 | 1.2% | 12,003 | 1.2% | 13 |
| L.A. Fitness Sports Club | 474 | 1.2% | 9,989 | 1.0% | 13 |
| Trader Joe's | 282 | 0.7% | 9,595 | 1.0% | 28 |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank | 139 | 0.3% | 9,050 | 0.9% | 45 |
| Ross Dress For Less | 534 | 1.3% | 8,775 | 0.9% | 24 |
| Nordstrom | 308 | 0.8% | 8,398 | 0.9% | 9 |
| Gap, Inc. | 250 | 0.6% | 7,810 | 0.8% | 21 |
| Starbucks | 138 | 0.3% | 7,776 | 0.8% | 88 |
| H.E. Butt Grocery Company | 482 | 1.2% | 7,376 | 0.8% | 6 |
| Wells Fargo Bank | 130 | 0.3% | 7,039 | 0.7% | 46 |
| JAB Holding Company | 168 | 0.4% | 6,904 | 0.7% | 60 |
| Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. | 286 | 0.7% | 6,807 | 0.7% | 30 |
| Target | 654 | 1.6% | 6,790 | 0.7% | 6 |
| Bank of America | 119 | 0.3% | 6,778 | 0.7% | 40 |
| Kohl's | 526 | 1.3% | 6,247 | 0.6% | 7 |
| Best Buy | 259 | 0.6% | 6,027 | 0.6% | 8 |
| Walgreens Boots Alliance | 230 | 0.6% | 5,684 | 0.6% | 21 |
| Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. | 325 | 0.8% | 5,538 | 0.6% | 11 |
| Ulta | 172 | 0.4% | 5,161 | 0.5% | 19 |
| AT&T, Inc. | 109 | 0.3% | 4,929 | 0.5% | 56 |
| Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. | 274 | 0.7% | 4,832 | 0.5% | 4 |
| Life Time | 111 | 0.3% | 4,700 | 0.5% | 1 |
| Xponential Fitness | 118 | 0.3% | 4,631 | 0.5% | 72 |
| Top Tenants | 17,649 | 43.3% | $320,591 | 32.8% | 949 |

Our leases for tenant space under 10,000 square feet generally have initial terms ranging from three to seven years. Leases greater than 10,000 square feet ('Anchor Leases') generally have initial lease terms in excess of five years and are mostly comprised of Anchor Tenants. Many of the leases contain provisions allowing the tenant the option of extending the term of the lease at expiration. Our leases typically provide for the payment of fixed base rent, the tenant's Pro-rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance ('CAM') expenses, and reimbursement for utility costs if not directly metered.

25

The following table summarizes Pro-rata lease expirations for the next ten years and thereafter, for our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, assuming no tenants renew their leases (GLA and dollars of In Place Annual Base Rent Expiring Under Leases in thousands):

| Lease Expiration Year | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | Pro-rata Expiring GLA | Percent of Total Company GLA | In Place Annual Base Rent Expiring Under Leases | Percent of In Place Annual Base Rent | Pro-rata Expiring Average Annual Base Rent PSF |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) | 171 | 85 | 0.2% | $1,275 | 0.1% | $15.03 |
| 2023 | 930 | 2,803 | 7.0% | 72,559 | 7.6% | 25.88 |
| 2024 | 1,211 | 5,571 | 13.8% | 128,039 | 13.4% | 22.98 |
| 2025 | 1,193 | 5,117 | 12.7% | 123,403 | 12.9% | 24.12 |
| 2026 | 1,058 | 4,998 | 12.4% | 120,059 | 12.5% | 24.02 |
| 2027 | 1,196 | 5,725 | 14.2% | 136,987 | 14.3% | 23.93 |
| 2028 | 659 | 3,930 | 9.7% | 98,400 | 10.3% | 25.04 |
| 2029 | 341 | 2,055 | 5.1% | 44,765 | 4.7% | 21.79 |
| 2030 | 285 | 1,895 | 4.7% | 46,163 | 4.8% | 24.36 |
| 2031 | 332 | 1,546 | 3.8% | 42,393 | 4.4% | 27.42 |
| 2032 | 454 | 1,695 | 4.2% | 46,320 | 4.8% | 27.32 |
| Thereafter | 356 | 4,908 | 12.2% | 97,645 | 10.2% | 19.89 |
| Total | 8,186 | 40,328 | 100.0% | $958,008 | 100.0% | $23.76 |

(1) Leases currently under month-to-month rent or in process of renewal.

During 2023, we have a total of 930 leases expiring, representing 2.8 million square feet of GLA. These expiring leases have an average base rent of $25.88 PSF. The average base rent of new leases signed during 2022 was $32.47 PSF. During periods of economic weakness or when percent leased is low, tenants have more bargaining power, which may result in rental rate declines on new or renewal leases. In periods of recovery and/or when percent leased levels are high, landlords have more bargaining power, which generally results in rental rate growth on new and renewal leases.

Demand for retail space in high quality, community centers located in areas with compelling demographics remains strong, especially among successful business operators and growing innovative business concepts. However, inflationary challenges and the potential for an economic recession could result in pressure on base rent growth for new and renewal leases as businesses seek to manage costs.

26

The following table lists information about our consolidated and unconsolidated properties. For further information, see "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Report.

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Amerige Heights Town Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2000 | 2000 | $ - | 97 | 100.0% | $32.04 | Albertsons, (Target) |
| Brea Marketplace | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1987 | - | 352 | 94.3% | 20.81 | 24 Hour Fitness, Big 5 Sporting Goods, Childtime Childcare, Old Navy, Sprout's, Target |
| Circle Center West | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2017 | 1989 | - | 64 | 94.5% | 37.59 | Marshalls |
| Circle Marina Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2019 | 1994 | 24,000 | 118 | 94.8% | 30.69 | Staples, Big 5 Sporting Goods, Centinela Feed & Pet Supplies |
| Culver Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2017 | 2000 | - | 217 | 92.4% | 32.94 | Ralphs, Best Buy, LA Fitness, Sit N' Sleep |
| El Camino Shopping Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 2017 | - | 136 | 100.0% | 42.19 | Bristol Farms, CVS |
| Granada Village | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2012 | 50,000 | 227 | 100.0% | 27.29 | Sprout's Markets, Rite Aid, PETCO, Homegoods, Burlington, TJ Maxx |
| Hasley Canyon Village | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2003 | 2003 | 16,000 | 66 | 97.5% | 26.85 | Ralphs |
| Heritage Plaza | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 2012 | - | 230 | 99.9% | 42.09 | Ralphs, CVS, Daiso, Mitsuwa Marketplace, Big 5 Sporting Goods |
| Laguna Niguel Plaza | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1985 | - | 42 | 92.4% | 30.90 | CVS (Albertsons) |
| Morningside Plaza | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 1996 | - | 91 | 100.0% | 25.15 | Stater Bros. |
| Newland Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 2016 | - | 152 | 95.6% | 28.13 | Albertsons |
| Plaza Hermosa | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 2013 | - | 95 | 100.0% | 28.44 | Von's, CVS |
| Ralphs Circle Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2017 | 1983 | - | 60 | 100.0% | 20.56 | Ralphs |
| Rona Plaza | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 1989 | - | 52 | 88.4% | 20.14 | Superior Super Warehouse |
| Seal Beach | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 20% | 2002 | 1966 | - | 97 | 96.6% | 26.73 | Pavilions, CVS |
| Talega Village Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2017 | 2007 | - | 102 | 97.7% | 23.06 | Ralphs |
| Town and Country Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 35% | 2018 | 1992 | 93,628 | 73 | 100.0% | 57.21 | Whole Foods, CVS, Citibank |
| Tustin Legacy | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2016 | 2017 | - | 112 | 97.9% | 34.71 | Stater Bros, CVS |
| Twin Oaks Shopping Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2019 | 19,000 | 98 | 100.0% | 22.25 | Ralphs, Rite Aid |
| Valencia Crossroads | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2002 | 2003 | - | 173 | 100.0% | 28.65 | Whole Foods, Kohl's |
| Village at La Floresta | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2014 | 2014 | - | 87 | 97.8% | 37.39 | Whole Foods |
| Von's Circle Center | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 2017 | 1972 | 5,031 | 151 | 100.0% | 27.52 | Von's, Ross Dress for Less, Planet Fitness |
| Woodman Van Nuys | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | CA |  | 1999 | 1992 | - | 108 | 96.1% | 16.32 | El Super |
| Silverado Plaza | Napa | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1974 | 8,667 | 85 | 96.4% | 21.39 | Nob Hill, CVS |
| Gelson's Westlake Market Plaza | Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura | CA |  | 2002 | 2016 | - | 86 | 98.8% | 32.11 | Gelson's Markets, John of Italy Salon & Spa |
| Oakbrook Plaza | Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura | CA |  | 1999 | 2017 | - | 83 | 96.3% | 22.22 | Gelson's Markets, (CVS), (Ace Hardware) |
| Westlake Village Plaza and Center | Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura | CA |  | 1999 | 2015 | - | 201 | 98.9% | 41.86 | Von's, Sprouts, (CVS) |
| French Valley Village Center | Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario | CA |  | 2004 | 2004 | - | 99 | 98.4% | 27.58 | Stater Bros, CVS |
| Oakshade Town Center | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | CA |  | 2011 | 1998 | 4,869 | 104 | 99.3% | 23.31 | Safeway, Office Max, Rite Aid |
| Prairie City Crossing | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | CA |  | 1999 | 1999 | - | 90 | 97.5% | 22.39 | Safeway |
| Raley's Supermarket | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | CA | 20% | 2007 | 1964 | - | 63 | 100.0% | 14.00 | Raley's |
| The Marketplace | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | CA |  | 2017 | 1990 | - | 111 | 100.0% | 27.13 | Safeway, CVS, Petco |
| 4S Commons Town Center | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | 85% | 2004 | 2004 | 80,812 | 252 | 100.0% | 33.96 | Ace Hardware, Bed Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, CVS, Jimbo's... Naturally!, Ralphs, ULTA |
| Balboa Mesa Shopping Center | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA |  | 2012 | 2014 | - | 207 | 100.0% | 29.07 | CVS, Kohl's, Von's |
| El Norte Pkwy Plaza | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA |  | 1999 | 2013 | - | 91 | 99.0% | 20.13 | Von's, Children's Paradise, ACE Hardware |
| Friars Mission Center | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA |  | 1999 | 1989 | - | 147 | 100.0% | 39.09 | Ralphs, CVS |

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Navajo Shopping Center | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1964 | 11,000 | 102 | 100.0% | 15.68 | Albertsons, Rite Aid, O'Reilly, Auto Parts |
| Point Loma Plaza | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1987 | 22,391 | 205 | 99.4% | 23.96 | Von's, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Marshalls, UFC Gym |
| Rancho San Diego Village | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1981 | - | 153 | 95.1% | 24.64 | Smart & Final, 24 Hour Fitness, (Longs Drug) |
| Scripps Ranch Marketplace | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | - | 2017 | 2017 | - | 132 | 99.5% | 33.05 | Vons, CVS |
| The Hub Hillcrest Market | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | - | 2012 | 2015 | - | 149 | 91.0% | 42.54 | Ralphs, Trader Joe's |
| Twin Peaks | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad | CA | - | 1999 | 1988 | - | 208 | 97.9% | 22.11 | Target, Grocer |
| 200 Potrero | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 1928 | - | 31 | 100.0% | 11.34 | Gizmo Art Production, INC. |
| Bayhill Shopping Center | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2019 | 28,800 | 122 | 99.2% | 27.69 | CVS, Mollie Stone's Market |
| Clayton Valley Shopping Center | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2003 | 2004 | - | 260 | 90.2% | 23.66 | Grocery Outlet, Central, CVS, Dollar Tree, Ross Dress For Less |
| Diablo Plaza | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 1999 | 1982 | - | 63 | 94.9% | 41.83 | Bevmo!, (Safeway), (CVS) |
| El Cerrito Plaza | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2000 | 2000 | - | 256 | 79.5% | 29.87 | Barnes & Noble, Jo-Ann Fabrics, PETCO, Ross Dress For Less, Trader Joe's, (CVS) |
| Encina Grande | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 1999 | 2016 | - | 107 | 100.0% | 35.81 | Whole Foods, Walgreens |
| Persimmon Place | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2014 | 2014 | - | 153 | 100.0% | 37.31 | Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Homegoods |
| Plaza Escuela | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 2002 | - | 154 | 93.5% | 44.20 | The Container Store, Trullusion, Talbots, The Cheesecake Factory, Barnes & Noble |
| Pleasant Hill Shopping Center | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2016 | 50,000 | 227 | 98.3% | 24.29 | Target, Burlington, Ross Dress for Less, Homegoods |
| Potrero Center | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 1997 | - | 227 | 76.8% | 33.03 | Safeway, 24 Hour Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Petco |
| Powell Street Plaza | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2001 | 1987 | - | 166 | 97.3% | 35.38 | Trader Joe's, Bevmo!, Ross Dress For Less, Marshalls, Old Navy |
| San Carlos Marketplace | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 2007 | - | 154 | 100.0% | 36.29 | TJ Maxx, Best Buy, PetSmart, Bassett Furniture |
| San Leandro Plaza | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 1999 | 1982 | - | 50 | 100.0% | 37.66 | (Safeway), (CVS) |
| Serramonte Center | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 2018 | - | 1,072 | 89.9% | 26.75 | Buy Buy Baby, Cost Plus World Market, Crunch Fitness, DAISO, Dave & Buster's, Dick's Sporting Goods, Divano Homes, H&M, Macy's, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Party City, Ross Dress for Less, Target, TJ Maxx, Uniqlo |
| Tassajara Crossing | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 1999 | 1990 | - | 146 | 99.3% | 26.40 | Safeway, CVS, Alamo Hardware |
| Willows Shopping Center (6) | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 2017 | 2015 | - | 247 | 78.6% | 30.85 | REI, UFC Gym, Old Navy, Ulta, Five Below |
| Woodside Central | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | - | 1999 | 1993 | - | 81 | 94.9% | 26.40 | Chuck E. Cheese, Marshalls, (Target) |
| Ygnacio Plaza | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1968 | 25,850 | 110 | 95.4% | 40.57 | Sports Basement, TJ Maxx |
| Blossom Valley | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | - | 1999 | 1990 | 22,300 | 93 | 93.7% | 27.44 | Safeway |
| Mariposa Shopping Center | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2020 | 26,950 | 127 | 94.0% | 21.72 | Safeway, CVS, Ross Dress for Less |
| Shoppes at Homestead | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | - | 1999 | 1983 | - | 116 | 97.8% | 25.30 | CVS, Crunch Fitness, (Orchard Supply Hardware) |
| Snell & Branham Plaza | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | 40% | 2005 | 1988 | 11,570 | 92 | 98.5% | 21.11 | Safeway |
| The Pranayard | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | - | 2019 | 2014 | 2,200 | 260 | 97.5% | 41.19 | Trader Joe's, The Sports Basement, Camera Cinemas, Marshalls |
| West Park Plaza | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara | CA | - | 1999 | 1996 | - | 88 | 98.0% | 20.32 | Safeway, Rite Aid |
| Golden Hills Plaza | San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles | CA | - | 2006 | 2017 | - | 244 | 85.6% | 6.92 | Lowe's, TJ Maxx |
| Five Points Shopping Center | Santa Maria-Santa Barbara | CA | 40% | 2005 | 2014 | 22,924 | 145 | 97.6% | 30.78 | Smart & Final, CVS, Ross Dress for Less, Big 5 Sporting Goods, PETCO |
| Corral Hollow | Stockton | CA | - | 2000 | 2000 | - | 167 | 70.4% | 20.69 | Safeway, CVS |

28

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Alcove On Arapahoe | Boulder | CO | 40% | 2005 | 2019 | 26,700 | 159 | 89.5% | 19.51 | PETCO, HomeGoods, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Safeway, Ulta Salon |
| Crossroads Commons | Boulder | CO | 20% | 2001 | 1986 | 34,500 | 143 | 93.6% | 29.95 | Whole Foods, Barnes & Noble |
| Crossroads Commons II | Boulder | CO | 20% | 2018 | 1995 | 5,500 | 18 | 100.0% | 41.11 | (Whole Foods), (Barnes & Noble) |
| Falcon Marketplace | Colorado Springs | CO |  | 2005 | 2005 | - | 23 | 100.0% | 25.14 | (Wal-Mart) |
| Marketplace at Briargate | Colorado Springs | CO |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 29 | 100.0% | 35.01 | (King Soopers) |
| Monument Jackson Creek | Colorado Springs | CO |  | 1998 | 1999 | - | 85 | 98.4% | 12.52 | King Soopers |
| Woodmen Plaza | Colorado Springs | CO |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 116 | 96.4% | 13.67 | King Soopers |
| Applewood Shopping Ctr | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO | 40% | 2005 | 2020 | - | 360 | 91.9% | 16.64 | Applejack Liquors, Hobby Lobby, Homegoods, King Soopers, PetSmart, Sierra Trading Post, Ulta |
| Belleview Square | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 2004 | 2013 | - | 117 | 97.3% | 20.83 | King Soopers |
| Boulevard Center | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 1999 | 1986 | - | 77 | 87.6% | 31.81 | Eve Care Specialists, (Safeway) |
| Buckley Square | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 1999 | 1978 | - | 116 | 90.5% | 11.23 | Ace Hardware, King Soopers |
| Cherrywood Square Shop Ctr | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO | 40% | 2005 | 1978 | 9,650 | 97 | 100.0% | 12.78 | King Soopers |
| Hilltop Village | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 2002 | 2018 | - | 101 | 98.7% | 12.64 | King Soopers |
| Littleton Square | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 1999 | 2015 | - | 99 | 100.0% | 11.88 | King Soopers |
| Lloyd King Center | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 83 | 100.0% | 12.40 | King Soopers |
| Ralston Square Shopping Center | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO | 40% | 2005 | 1977 | - | 83 | 96.7% | 15.95 | King Soopers |
| Shops at Quail Creek | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 2008 | 2008 | - | 38 | 92.5% | 25.79 | (King Soopers) |
| Stroh Ranch | Denver-Aurora-Lakewood | CO |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 93 | 98.3% | 13.87 | King Soopers |
| Centerplace of Greeley III | Greeley | CO |  | 2007 | 2007 | - | 119 | 97.7% | 11.73 | Hobby Lobby, Best Buy, TJ Maxx |
| 22 Crescent Road | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 1984 | - | 4 | 100.0% | 60.00 | - |
| 91 Danbury Road | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 1965 | - | 5 | 100.0% | 29.47 | - |
| Black Rock | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT | 80% | 2014 | 1996 | 18,637 | 98 | 91.2% | 29.66 | Old Navy, The Clubhouse |
| Brick Walk (6) | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT | 80% | 2014 | 2007 | 31,131 | 122 | 98.1% | 44.79 | - |
| Compo Acres Shopping Center | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 2011 | - | 43 | 95.9% | 54.78 | Trader Joe's |
| Copps Hill Plaza | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 2002 | 8,962 | 173 | 62.4% | 26.12 | Rite Aid, Stop & Shop, Homegoods |
| Danbury Green | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 2006 | - | 124 | 100.0% | 26.78 | Trader Joe's, Hilton Garden Inn, DSW, Staples, Rite Aid, Warehouse Wines & Liquors |
| Darnor Plaza (6) | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 1978 | - | 153 | 100.0% | 20.24 | Kohl's, Old Navy, Party City |
| Fairfield Center (6) | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT | 80% | 2014 | 2000 | - | 95 | 88.7% | 33.96 | Fairfield University Bookstore, Merrill Lynch |
| Post Road Plaza | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 1978 | - | 20 | 100.0% | 55.98 | Trader Joe's |
| Walmart Norwalk | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 2003 | - | 142 | 100.0% | 0.56 | WalMart, HomeGoods |
| Westport Row | Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk | CT |  | 2017 | 2020 | - | 91 | 93.0% | 43.32 | The Fresh Market, Pottery Barn |
| Brookside Plaza | Hartford-E Hartford-Middletown | CT |  | 2017 | 2006 | - | 227 | 95.8% | 15.56 | Bed, Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, PetSmart, ShopRite, Staples, TJ Maxx |
| Corbin's Corner | Hartford-E Hartford-Middletown | CT | 40% | 2005 | 2015 | 53,000 | 186 | 98.1% | 31.71 | Best Buy, Edge Fitness, Old Navy, The Tile Shop, Total Wine and More, Trader Joe's |
| Southbury Green | New Haven-Milford | CT |  | 2017 | 2002 | - | 156 | 83.9% | 21.79 | ShopRite, Homegoods |
| Shops at The Columbia | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | DC |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 23 | 85.8% | 42.56 | Trader Joe's |
| Spring Valley Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | DC | 40% | 2005 | 1930 | 10,797 | 17 | 100.0% | 100.30 | - |
| Pike Creek | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | DE |  | 1998 | 2013 | - | 230 | 94.5% | 16.75 | Acme Markets, Edge Fitness, Pike Creek Community Hardware |
| Shoppes of Graylyn | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | DE | 40% | 2005 | 1971 | - | 64 | 100.0% | 25.44 | Rite Aid |
| Corkscrew Village | Cape Coral-Fort Myers | FL |  | 2007 | 1997 | - | 82 | 96.5% | 14.84 | Publix |
| Shoppes of Grande Oak | Cape Coral-Fort Myers | FL |  | 2000 | 2000 | - | 79 | 100.0% | 17.92 | Publix |

26

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Millhopper Shopping Center | Gainesville | FL |  | 1993 | 2017 | - | 85 | 98.5% | 19.40 | Publix |
| Newberry Square | Gainesville | FL |  | 1994 | 1986 | - | 181 | 90.3% | 9.47 | Publix, Floor & Decor, Dollar Tree |
| Anastasia Plaza | Jacksonville | FL |  | 1993 | 1988 | - | 102 | 97.4% | 15.09 | Publix |
| Atlantic Village | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2017 | 2014 | - | 110 | 96.8% | 18.11 | LA Fitness, Pet Supplies Plus |
| Brooklyn Station on Riverside | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2013 | 2013 | - | 50 | 97.2% | 28.17 | The Fresh Market |
| Courtyard Shopping Center | Jacksonville | FL |  | 1993 | 1987 | - | 137 | 100.0% | 3.68 | Target, (Publix) |
| East San Marco | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2007 | 2022 | - | 59 | 100.0% | 28.36 | Publix |
| Fleming Island | Jacksonville | FL |  | 1998 | 2000 | - | 132 | 95.7% | 16.92 | Publix, PETCO, Planet Fitness, (Target) |
| Hibernia Pavilion | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 51 | 92.0% | 16.59 | Publix |
| John's Creek Center | Jacksonville | FL | 20% | 2003 | 2004 | 9,000 | 76 | 100.0% | 16.67 | Publix |
| Jalington Village | Jacksonville | FL | 20% | 1999 | 1999 | 10,000 | 82 | 100.0% | 17.20 | Publix, (CVS) |
| Mandarin Landing | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2017 | 1976 | - | 140 | 88.5% | 19.67 | Whole Foods, Aveda Institute, Baptist Health |
| Nocatee Town Center | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2007 | 2017 | - | 114 | 100.0% | 22.98 | Publix |
| Oakleaf Commons | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 77 | 100.0% | 16.66 | Publix |
| Old St Augustine Plaza | Jacksonville | FL |  | 1996 | 2020 | - | 248 | 100.0% | 11.08 | Publix, Burlington Coat Factory, Hobby Lobby, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less |
| Pablo Plaza | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2017 | 2020 | - | 161 | 100.0% | 18.34 | Whole Foods, Office Depot, Marshalls, HomeGoods, PetSmart |
| Pine Tree Plaza | Jacksonville | FL |  | 1997 | 1999 | - | 63 | 96.9% | 14.58 | Publix |
| Seminole Shoppes | Jacksonville | FL | 50% | 2009 | 2018 | 7,612 | 87 | 100.0% | 23.96 | Publix |
| Shoppes at Bartram Park | Jacksonville | FL | 50% | 2005 | 2017 | - | 135 | 99.0% | 22.20 | Publix, (Kohl's), (Tutor Time) |
| Shops at John's Creek | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2003 | 2004 | - | 15 | 100.0% | 26.42 | - |
| South Beach Regional | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2017 | 1990 | - | 308 | 92.3% | 17.15 | Trader Joe's, Home Depot, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond, Staples, Nordstrom Rack |
| Starke (6) | Jacksonville | FL |  | 2000 | 2000 | - | 13 | 100.0% | 27.05 | CVS |
| Aventura Shopping Center | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1994 | 2017 | - | 97 | 97.5% | 38.19 | CVS, Publix |
| Aventura Square (6) | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1991 | 2,340 | 144 | 78.8% | 39.74 | Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW Warehouse, Jewelry Exchange, Old Navy |
| Banco Popular Building | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1971 | - | - | 0.0% | - | - |
| Bird 107 Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1990 | - | 40 | 92.9% | 21.98 | Walgreens |
| Bird Ludlam | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1998 | - | 192 | 97.3% | 25.60 | CVS, Goodwill, Winn-Dixie |
| Boca Village Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2014 | - | 92 | 100.0% | 22.70 | CVS, Publix |
| Boynton Lakes Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1997 | 2012 | - | 110 | 93.8% | 16.63 | Citi Trends, Pet Supermarket, Publix |
| Boynton Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2015 | - | 105 | 95.7% | 21.07 | CVS, Publix |
| Caligo Crossing | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2007 | 2007 | - | 11 | 100.0% | 46.34 | (Kohl's) |
| Chasewood Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1993 | 2015 | - | 152 | 94.9% | 27.58 | Publix, Pet Smart |
| Concord Shopping Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1993 | - | 309 | 100.0% | 13.35 | Big Lots, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, Winn-Dixie, YouFit Health Club |
| Coral Reef Shopping Center | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1990 | - | 75 | 84.6% | 31.86 | Aldi, Walgreens |
| Country Walk Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2008 | 16,000 | 101 | 96.7% | 22.44 | Publix, CVS |
| Countryside Shops | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2018 | - | 193 | 70.4% | 25.03 | Publix, Ross Dress for Less |
| Fountain Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2013 | 2013 | - | 177 | 96.6% | 28.90 | Publix, Ross Dress for Less, TJ Maxx, Ulta, (Target) |
| Gardens Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1997 | 1991 | - | 90 | 98.8% | 18.98 | Publix |
| Greenwood Shopping Centre | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1994 | - | 133 | 94.0% | 16.81 | Publix, Bealls |
| Hammocks Town Center | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1993 | - | 187 | 95.2% | 18.33 | CVS, Goodwill, Publix, Metro-Dade Public Library, YouFit Health Club, (Kendall Ice Arena) |
| Pine Island | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1999 | - | 255 | 99.5% | 15.24 | Publix, Burlington Coat Factory, Beall's Outlet, YouFit Health Club |
| Pine Ridge Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2013 | - | 118 | 97.7% | 19.23 | The Fresh Market, Bed Bath & Beyond, Marshalls, Ulta |
| Pinecrest Place (6) | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2017 | - | 70 | 96.0% | 40.60 | Whole Foods, (Target) |

50

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Point Royale Shopping Center | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2018 | - | 202 | 100.0% | 16.80 | Winn-Dixie, Burlington Coat Factory, Pasteur Medical Center, Planet Fitness, Rana Furniture |
| Prosperity Centre | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1993 | - | 124 | 96.3% | 23.41 | Bed Bath & Beyond, Office Depot, TJ Maxx, CVS |
| Sawgrass Promenade | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1998 | - | 107 | 90.7% | 13.45 | Publix, Walgreens, Dollar Tree |
| Sheridan Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2022 | - | 507 | 94.9% | 19.76 | Publix, Kohl's, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Pet Supplies Plus, Wellmax, Burlington, Marshalls |
| Shoppes @ 104 | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1998 | 2018 | - | 112 | 90.0% | 19.88 | Winn-Dixie, CVS |
| Shoppes at Lago Mar | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1995 | - | 83 | 92.3% | 15.90 | Publix, YouFit Health Club |
| Shoppes of Jonathan's Landing | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1997 | - | 27 | 100.0% | 27.15 | (Publix) |
| Shoppes of Oakbrook | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2003 | 410 | 200 | 68.3% | 18.45 | Publix, Tuesday Morning, Duffy's Sports Bar, CVS |
| Shoppes of Silver Lakes | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1997 | - | 127 | 95.9% | 20.62 | Publix, Goodwill |
| Shoppes of Sunset | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2009 | - | 22 | 74.2% | 25.56 | - |
| Shoppes of Sunset II | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2009 | - | 28 | 85.6% | 23.09 | - |
| Shops at Skylake | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2006 | - | 287 | 97.4% | 24.81 | Publix, LA Fitness, TJ Maxx, Goodwill, Pasteur Medical |
| Tamarac Town Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 1987 | - | 125 | 88.7% | 12.54 | Publix, Dollar Tree, Retro Fitness |
| University Commons (6) | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2015 | 2001 | - | 180 | 100.0% | 34.79 | Whole Foods, Nordstrom Racks, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond |
| Waterstone Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2005 | - | 61 | 100.0% | 17.74 | Publix |
| Welleby Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1996 | 1982 | - | 110 | 96.8% | 14.98 | Publix, Dollar Tree |
| Wellington Town Square | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 1996 | 2022 | - | 108 | 95.0% | 24.81 | Publix, CVS |
| West Bird Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2021 | - | 99 | 97.9% | 25.43 | Publix |
| West Lake Shopping Center | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2000 | - | 101 | 96.6% | 22.02 | Winn-Dixie, CVS |
| Westport Plaza | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch | FL |  | 2017 | 2002 | 1,457 | 47 | 91.6% | 21.06 | Publix |
| Berkshire Commons | Naples-Marco Island | FL |  | 1994 | 1992 | - | 110 | 100.0% | 15.83 | Publix, Walgreens |
| Naples Walk | Naples-Marco Island | FL |  | 2007 | 1999 | - | 125 | 100.0% | 18.95 | Publix |
| Pavillion | Naples-Marco Island | FL |  | 2017 | 2011 | - | 168 | 98.7% | 23.51 | LA Fitness, Paragon Theaters, J. Lee Salon Suites |
| Shoppes of Pebblebrook Plaza | Naples-Marco Island | FL | 50% | 2000 | 2000 | - | 80 | 97.0% | 16.51 | Publix, (Walgreens) |
| Glengary Shoppes | North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton | FL |  | 2017 | 1995 | - | 93 | 97.0% | 20.42 | Best Buy, Barnes & Noble |
| Alafaya Village | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2017 | 1986 | - | 38 | 93.9% | 25.76 | - |
| Kirkman Shoppes | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2017 | 2015 | - | 116 | 98.5% | 25.78 | LA Fitness, Walgreens |
| Lake Mary Centre | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2017 | 2015 | - | 360 | 93.3% | 17.55 | The Fresh Market, Academy Sports, Hobby Lobby, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Office Depot |
| Plaza Venezia | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL | 20% | 2016 | 2000 | 36,500 | 203 | 100.0% | 32.31 | Publix, Eddie V's |
| Town and Country | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2017 | 1993 | - | 78 | 100.0% | 11.47 | Ross Dress for Less |
| Unigold Shopping Center | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2017 | 1987 | - | 115 | 89.3% | 15.61 | YouFit Health Club, Ross Dress for Less |
| Willa Springs | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford | FL |  | 2000 | 2000 | 16,700 | 90 | 98.3% | 22.58 | Publix |
| Cashmere Corners | Port St. Lucie | FL |  | 2017 | 2016 | - | 80 | 96.1% | 14.83 | WalMart |
| The Plaza at St. Lucie West | Port St. Lucie | FL |  | 2017 | 2006 | - | 27 | 100.0% | 25.58 | - |
| Charlotte Square | Punta Gorda | FL |  | 2017 | 1980 | - | 91 | 94.1% | 11.68 | WalMart, Buffet City |
| Ryanwood Square | Sebastian-Vero Beach | FL |  | 2017 | 1987 | - | 115 | 90.0% | 12.28 | Publix, Beall's, Harbor Freight Tools |
| South Point | Sebastian-Vero Beach | FL |  | 2017 | 2003 | - | 65 | 100.0% | 15.68 | Publix |
| Treasure Coast Plaza | Sebastian-Vero Beach | FL |  | 2017 | 1983 | 1,166 | 134 | 98.2% | 18.77 | Publix, TJ Maxx |
| Carriage Gate | Tallahassee | FL |  | 1994 | 2013 | - | 73 | 100.0% | 24.83 | Trader Joe's, TJ Maxx |
| Ocala Corners (7) | Tallahassee | FL |  | 2000 | 2000 | - | 93 | 88.3% | 13.89 | Publix |
| Bloomingdale Square | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 1998 | 2021 | - | 252 | 98.0% | 19.30 | Bealls, Dollar Tree, Home Centric, LA Fitness, Publix |
| Northgate Square | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 2007 | 1995 | - | 76 | 98.1% | 15.95 | Publix |

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Regency Square | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 1993 | 2013 | - | 352 | 96.1% | 19.79 | AMC Theater, Dollar Tree, Five Below, Marshalls, Michael's, PETCO, Shoe Carnival, Staples, TJ Maxx, Ulta, Old Navy, (Best Buy), (Mucdill) |
| Shoppes at Sunlake Centre | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 2017 | 2008 | - | 117 | 100.0% | 24.78 | Publix |
| Suncoast Crossing (6) | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 2007 | 2007 | - | 118 | 96.4% | 7.01 | Kohl's, (Target) |
| The Village at Hunter's Lake | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 2018 | 2018 | - | 72 | 100.0% | 28.05 | Sprouts |
| Town Square | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 1997 | 1999 | - | 44 | 100.0% | 33.86 | PETCO, Barnes & Noble |
| Village Center | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 1995 | 2014 | - | 187 | 97.4% | 22.38 | Publix, PGA Tour Superstore, Walgreens |
| Westchase | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater | FL |  | 2007 | 1998 | - | 79 | 100.0% | 17.57 | Publix |
| Ashford Place | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1993 | - | 53 | 86.1% | 24.58 | Harbor Freight Tools |
| Briarcliff La Vista | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1962 | - | 43 | 100.0% | 22.38 | Michael's |
| Briarcliff Village | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1990 | - | 189 | 98.3% | 17.01 | Burlington, Party City, Publix, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx |
| Bridgemill Market | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 2000 | - | 89 | 91.7% | 17.77 | Publix |
| Brighton Park | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 2016 | - | 137 | 98.9% | 28.37 | Lidl, Big Blue Swim School, Kohl's |
| Buckhead Court | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1984 | - | 49 | 89.7% | 31.78 | - |
| Buckhead Landing | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 1998 | - | 152 | 74.3% | 19.52 | Binders Art Supplies & Frames, Kroger Bed Bath & Beyond, Cool Plus World |
| Buckhead Station | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 1996 | - | 234 | 100.0% | 25.27 | Market, DSW Warehouse, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Saks Off 5th, TJ Maxx, Ulta |
| Cambridge Square | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1996 | 1979 | - | 71 | 40.0% | 26.89 | - |
| Chastain Square | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 2001 | - | 92 | 100.0% | 23.53 | Publix |
| Cornerstone Square | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1990 | - | 80 | 90.7% | 18.96 | Aldi, Barking Hound Village, CVS, HealthMarkets Insurance |
| Dunwoody Hall | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1986 | 13,800 | 86 | 96.2% | 21.03 | Publix |
| Dunwoody Village | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1975 | - | 121 | 93.5% | 21.49 | The Fresh Market, Walgreens, Dunwoody Prep |
| Howell Mill Village | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2004 | 1984 | - | 92 | 100.0% | 25.11 | Publix |
| Paces Ferry Plaza | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 2018 | - | 82 | 99.9% | 40.24 | Whole Foods |
| Powers Ferry Square | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 2013 | - | 97 | 100.0% | 35.26 | HomeGoods, PETCO |
| Powers Ferry Village | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1997 | 1994 | - | 69 | 100.0% | 10.48 | Publix, The Juice Box |
| Russell Ridge | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1994 | 1995 | - | 101 | 90.8% | 13.30 | Kroger |
| Sandy Springs | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2012 | 2006 | - | 116 | 98.1% | 25.63 | Trader Joe's, Fox's, Peter Glenn Ski & Sports |
| Sope Creek Crossing | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 1998 | 2016 | - | 99 | 95.5% | 16.72 | Publix |
| The Shops at Hampton Oaks | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 2009 | - | 21 | 89.1% | 11.81 | (CVS) |
| Williamsburg at Dunwoody | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharett | GA |  | 2017 | 1983 | - | 45 | 82.7% | 27.64 | - |
| Civic Center Plaza | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL | 40% | 2005 | 1989 | 22,000 | 265 | 96.6% | 10.54 | Saper H Mart, Home Depot, O'Reilly Automotive, King Spa |
| Clybourn Commons | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 2014 | 1999 | - | 32 | 95.0% | 37.88 | PETCO |
| Glen Oak Plaza | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 2010 | 1967 | - | 63 | 100.0% | 27.29 | Trader Joe's, Walgreens, Northshore University Healthsystems |
| Hinsdale Lake Commons (fka Hinsdale) | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 1998 | 2015 | - | 185 | 93.0% | 16.30 | Whole Foods, Goodwill, Charter Fitness, Petco |
| Mellody Farm | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 2017 | 2017 | - | 259 | 93.1% | 29.15 | Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, REI, HomeGoods, Barnes & Noble, West Elm |
| Naperville Plaza | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL | 20% | 2022 | 1961 | 23,000 | 115 | 96.8% | 25.65 | Casey's Foods, Trader Joe's, Oswald's Pharmacy |
| Riverside Sq & River's Edge | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL | 40% | 2005 | 1986 | - | 169 | 99.3% | 17.54 | Mariano's Fresh Market, Dollar Tree, Party City, Blink Fitness |
| Roscoe Square | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL | 40% | 2005 | 2012 | 24,500 | 140 | 70.0% | 28.09 | Mariano's Fresh Market, Walgreens |
| Westchester Commons | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 2001 | 2014 | - | 143 | 93.1% | 18.05 | Mariano's Fresh Market, Goodwill |
| Willow Festival (4) | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IL |  | 2010 | 2007 | - | 404 | 96.7% | 18.84 | Whole Foods, Lowe's, CVS, HomeGoods, REI, Best Buy, Ulta |

28

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSP (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Shops on Main | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | IN | 94% | 2013 | 2020 | - | 279 | 100.0% | 16.46 | Whole Foods, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less, HomeGoods, DSW, Nordstrom Rack, Marshalls |
| Willow Lake Shopping Center | Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson | IN | 40% | 2005 | 1987 | - | 86 | 72.4% | 18.98 | Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, (Kroger) |
| Willow Lake West Shopping Center | Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson | IN | 40% | 2005 | 2001 | 10,000 | 53 | 100.0% | 26.76 | Trader Joe's |
| Felloway Plaza | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA | 75% | 2013 | 2016 | 35,446 | 158 | 100.0% | 25.90 | Stop & Shop, Planet Fitness, BioLife Plasma Services |
| Shaw's at Plymouth | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2017 | 1993 | - | 60 | 100.0% | 19.34 | Shaw's |
| Shops at Saugus | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 87 | 96.9% | 30.54 | Trader Joe's, La-Z-Boy, PetSmart |
| Star's at Cambridge | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2017 | 1997 | - | 66 | 100.0% | 41.18 | Star Market |
| Star's at Quincy | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2017 | 1995 | - | 101 | 100.0% | 23.63 | Star Market |
| Star's at West Roxbury | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2017 | 2006 | - | 76 | 94.7% | 26.66 | Shaw's |
| The Abbot | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2017 | 1912 | - | 64 | 77.0% | 90.15 | Center for Effective Allusion |
| Twin City Plaza | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | MA |  | 2006 | 2004 | - | 285 | 100.0% | 22.09 | Shaw's, Marshall's, Extra Space Storage, Walgreens, K&G Fashion, Dollar Tree, Everfitness, Formlabs |
| Festival at Woodholme | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson | MD | 40% | 2005 | 1986 | 18,510 | 81 | 94.6% | 40.95 | Trader Joe's |
| Parkville Shopping Center | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson | MD | 40% | 2005 | 2013 | 9,960 | 165 | 98.2% | 17.45 | Giant, Parkville Lanes, Dollar Tree, Petco, The Cellar Parkville |
| Southside Marketplace | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson | MD | 40% | 2005 | 2011 | 24,800 | 125 | 90.8% | 25.45 | Giant |
| Village at Lee Airport (6) | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson | MD |  | 2005 | 2014 | - | 118 | 89.3% | 30.79 | Giant, (Sunrise) |
| Burnt Hills | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 20% | 2013 | 2004 | - | 31 | 86.9% | 42.83 | Trader Joe's |
| Cloppers Mill Village | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 40% | 2005 | 1995 | - | 137 | 95.8% | 19.47 | Shoppers Food Warehouse, Dollar Tree |
| Firstfield Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 40% | 2005 | 2014 | - | 22 | 100.0% | 43.23 | Planet Fitness |
| Takoma Park | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 40% | 2005 | 1960 | - | 107 | 100.0% | 15.21 | LA Fitness, CVS |
| Watkins Park Plaza | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 40% | 2005 | 1985 | - | 111 | 100.0% | 29.21 | Giant, Bowlmer AMF |
| Westbard Square | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD |  | 2017 | 2001 | - | 132 | 99.0% | 38.59 | CVS |
| Woodmoor Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | MD | 40% | 2005 | 1954 | 19,000 | 69 | 96.2% | 35.70 | Family Farm & Home |
| Fenton Marketplace | Flint | MI |  | 1999 | 1999 | - | 97 | 74.0% | 8.71 | Jo-Ann Fabrics, PETCO, Savers, Experience Fitness, (Burlington Coat Factory), (Aldi) |
| Apple Valley Square | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | MN |  | 2006 | 1998 | - | 179 | 100.0% | 16.92 | Whole Foods |
| Cedar Commons | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | MN |  | 2011 | 1999 | - | 66 | 100.0% | 28.33 | Lund's |
| Colonial Square | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | MN | 40% | 2005 | 2014 | 19,700 | 93 | 100.0% | 26.47 | Kohl's, PetSmart, HomeGoods, TJ Maxx |
| Rockford Road Plaza | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | MN | 40% | 2005 | 1991 | 20,000 | 204 | 96.9% | 13.82 | CUB Foods |
| Rockridge Center | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | MN | 20% | 2011 | 2006 | 14,500 | 125 | 99.4% | 14.63 | Schmucks |
| Brentwood Plaza | St. Louis | MO |  | 2007 | 2002 | - | 60 | 100.0% | 11.50 | Schmucks, (Home Depot) |
| Bridgeton | St. Louis | MO |  | 2007 | 2005 | - | 71 | 97.3% | 12.14 | Schmucks |
| Dardenne Crossing | St. Louis | MO |  | 2007 | 1996 | - | 67 | 100.0% | 11.60 | Walmart, TJ Maxx, HomeGoods, Famous Footwear, (Target), (Lowe's) |
| Kirkwood Commons | St. Louis | MO |  | 2007 | 2000 | - | 210 | 100.0% | 10.35 | Harris Teeter, Marshalls, Best Buy, PetSmart, Off Broadway Shoes, Old Navy, (Target) |
| Blakeney Town Center (Ika Blakeney Shopping Center) | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | NC |  | 2021 | 2006 | - | 384 | 99.7% | 26.17 | Chuck E. Cheese, The Fresh Market, Party City |
| Carmel Commons | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | NC |  | 1997 | 2012 | - | 141 | 91.3% | 24.75 | Chuck E. Cheese, The Fresh Market, Party City |
| Cochran Commons | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | NC | 20% | 2007 | 2003 | 3,359 | 66 | 100.0% | 17.43 | Harris Teeter, (Walgreens) |
| Willow Oaks | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | NC |  | 2014 | 2014 | - | 65 | 100.0% | 17.83 | Publix |
| Shops at Erwin Mill | Durham-Chapel Hill | NC | 55% | 2012 | 2012 | 10,000 | 91 | 96.4% | 19.27 | Harris Teeter |
| Southpoint Crossing | Durham-Chapel Hill | NC |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 103 | 98.4% | 16.98 | Harris Teeter |

35

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner-ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Village Plaza | Durham-Chapel Hill | NC | 20% | 2012 | 2020 | 12,000 | 73 | 96.7% | 23.16 | Whole Foods |
| Woodcroft Shopping Center | Durham-Chapel Hill | NC |  | 1996 | 1984 | - | 90 | 100.0% | 14.52 | Food Lion, ACE Hardware |
| Glenwood Village | Raleigh-Cary | NC |  | 1997 | 1983 | - | 43 | 100.0% | 18.28 | Harris Teeter |
| Holly Park | Raleigh-Cary | NC |  | 2013 | 1969 | - | 160 | 97.7% | 20.06 | DSW Warehouse, Trader Joe's, Ross Dress For Less, Staples, US Fitness Products, Jerry's Artarama, Pet Supplies Plus, Ulta |
| Lake Pine Plaza | Raleigh-Cary | NC |  | 1998 | 1997 | - | 88 | 100.0% | 14.35 | Harris Teeter |
| Market at Colonnade Center | Raleigh-Cary | NC |  | 2009 | 2009 | - | 58 | 100.0% | 28.26 | Whole Foods |
| Midtown East | Raleigh-Cary | NC | 50% | 2017 | 2017 | 36,000 | 159 | 100.0% | 24.28 | Wegmans |
| Ridgewood Shopping Center | Raleigh-Cary | NC | 20% | 2018 | 1951 | 9,278 | 94 | 91.2% | 21.35 | Whole Foods, Walgreens |
| Shoppes of Kildare | Raleigh-Cary | NC | 40% | 2005 | 1986 | 20,000 | 145 | 97.4% | 20.56 | Trader Joe's, Aldi, Staples, Barnes & Noble |
| Sutton Square | Raleigh-Cary | NC | 20% | 2006 | 1985 | - | 101 | 94.5% | 21.09 | The Fresh Market |
| Village District | Raleigh-Cary | NC | 30% | 2004 | 2018 | 75,000 | 559 | 94.0% | 26.46 | Harris Teeter, The Fresh Market, Wake Public Library, Walgreens, Talbots, Great Outdoor Provision Co., York Properties, The Cheshire Cat Gallery, Crunch Fitness Select Club, Bailey's Fine Jewelry, Sephora, Barnes & Noble, Goodnight's Comedy Club |
| Chimney Rock (6) | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NJ |  | 2016 | 2016 | - | 218 | 99.3% | 37.34 | Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Off 5th, The Container Store, Ulta |
| District at Metuchen | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NJ | 20% | 2018 | 2017 | 16,000 | 67 | 97.9% | 32.18 | Whole Foods |
| Plaza Square | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NJ | 40% | 2005 | 1990 | - | 104 | 62.0% | 19.60 | Grocer |
| Glenwood Green (7) | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | NJ | 70% | 2022 | 2022 | - | 355 | 83.0% | 11.00 | ShopRite, Target, Rendina |
| Haddon Commons | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | NJ | 40% | 2005 | 1985 | - | 54 | 100.0% | 15.18 | Acme Markets |
| 101 7th Avenue | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 1930 | - | 57 | 0.0% | - | - |
| 1175 Third Avenue | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 1995 | - | 25 | 100.0% | 116.62 | The Food Emporium |
| 1225-1239 Second Ave | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 1987 | - | 18 | 100.0% | 137.95 | CVS |
| 90 - 30 Metropolitan Avenue | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 2007 | - | 60 | 93.9% | 35.57 | Michaels, Staples, Trader Joe's |
| Broadway Plaza (8) | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 2014 | - | 147 | 89.9% | 41.06 | Aldi, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, TJ Maxx, Blink Fitness |
| Clocktower Plaza Shopping Ctr (9) | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 1995 | - | 79 | 100.0% | 49.89 | Stop & Shop |
| East Meadow | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2021 | 1980 | - | 141 | 93.3% | 15.73 | Marshalls, Stew Leonard's |
| East Meadow Plaza | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2022 | 1971 | - | 205 | 0.0% | 24.75 | Lidl, Dollar Deal |
| Eastport | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2021 | 1980 | - | 48 | 97.3% | 12.98 | King Kullen, Rite Aid |
| Hewlett Crossing I & II | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2018 | 1954 | 5,879 | 52 | 100.0% | 38.48 | - |
| Lake Grove Commons | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY | 40% | 2012 | 2008 | 50,000 | 141 | 100.0% | 35.81 | Whole Foods, LA Fitness |
| Rivertowns Square | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2018 | 2016 | - | 116 | 90.9% | 23.85 | Ulta, The Learning Experience, Mom's Organic Market, Look Cinemas |
| The Gallery at Westbury Plaza | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 2013 | - | 312 | 100.0% | 51.21 | Trader Joe's, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomington's, The Container Store, HomeGoods, Old Navy, Gap Outlet, Bassett Home Furnishings, Famous Footware |
| The Point at Garden City Park (9) | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2016 | 2018 | - | 105 | 100.0% | 30.09 | King Kullen, Ace Hardware |
| Valley Stream | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2021 | 1950 | - | 99 | 90.3% | 28.89 | King Kullen |
| Wading River | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2021 | 2002 | - | 99 | 84.1% | 23.38 | King Kullen, CVS, Ace Hardware |
| Westbury Plaza | New York-Newark-Jersey City | NY |  | 2017 | 2004 | 88,000 | 390 | 100.0% | 27.04 | WalMart, Costco, Marshalls, Total Wine and More, Olive Garden |
| Cherry Grove | Cincinnati | OH |  | 1998 | 2012 | - | 203 | 99.0% | 12.35 | Kroger, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx, Tuesday Morning |

50

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner- ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hyde Park | Cincinnati | OH |  | 1997 | 1995 | - | 401 | 92.3% | 17.41 | Kroger, Kohl's, Walgreens, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Ace Hardware, Staples, Marshalls |
| Red Bank Village | Cincinnati | OH |  | 2006 | 2018 | - | 176 | 100.0% | 7.73 | WalMart |
| Regency Commons | Cincinnati | OH |  | 2004 | 2004 | - | 34 | 79.0% | 27.33 |  |
| West Chester Plaza | Cincinnati | OH |  | 1998 | 1988 | - | 88 | 100.0% | 10.44 | Kroger |
| East Pointe | Columbus | OH |  | 1998 | 2014 | - | 111 | 100.0% | 11.34 | Kroger |
| Kroger New Albany Center | Columbus | OH |  | 1999 | 1999 | - | 93 | 100.0% | 13.47 | Kroger |
| Northgate Plaza (Maxtown Road) | Columbus | OH |  | 1998 | 2017 | - | 117 | 100.0% | 11.98 | Kroger, (Home Depot) |
| Corvallis Market Center | Corvallis | OR |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 85 | 100.0% | 22.29 | Michaels, TJ Maxx, Trader Joe's |
| Northgate Marketplace | Medford | OR |  | 2011 | 2011 | - | 81 | 84.2% | 22.18 | Trader Joe's, REI, PETCO |
| Northgate Marketplace Ph II | Medford | OR |  | 2015 | 2015 | - | 177 | 98.4% | 18.16 | Dick's Sporting Goods, Homewoods, Marshalls |
| Greenway Town Center | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | OR | 40% | 2005 | 2014 | - | 93 | 97.7% | 16.19 | Dollar Tree, Rite Aid, Whole Foods |
| Murrayhill Marketplace | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | OR |  | 1999 | 2016 | - | 150 | 84.4% | 20.35 | Safeway, Planet Fitness |
| Sherwood Crossroads | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | OR |  | 1999 | 1999 | - | 88 | 100.0% | 12.56 | Safeway |
| Tanasbourne Market (6) | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | OR |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 71 | 100.0% | 30.18 | Whole Foods |
| Walker Center | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | OR |  | 1999 | 1987 | - | 90 | 98.4% | 23.23 | Bed Bath & Beyond |
| Allen Street Shopping Ctr | Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton | PA | 40% | 2005 | 1958 | - | 46 | 100.0% | 18.74 | Grocery Outlet Bargain Market |
| Lower Nazareth Commons | Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton | PA |  | 2007 | 2012 | - | 96 | 100.0% | 26.62 | Burlington Coat Factory, PETCO, (Wegmans), (Target) |
| Stefco Boulevard Shopping Center | Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton | PA | 40% | 2005 | 1976 | - | 134 | 86.4% | 11.31 | Valley Farm Market, Dollar Tree |
| Hershey (6) | Harrisburg-Carliste | PA |  | 2000 | 2000 | - | 6 | 100.0% | 30.00 |  |
| Baederwood Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA | 80% | 2022 | 1999 | 24,365 | 117 | 97.0% | 27.91 | Whole Foods, Planet Fitness |
| City Avenue Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA | 40% | 2005 | 1960 | - | 162 | 91.8% | 20.76 | Ross Dress for Less, TJ Maxx, Dollar Tree |
| Gateway Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA |  | 2004 | 2016 | - | 224 | 99.0% | 34.25 | Trader Joe's, Staples, TJ Maxx, Jo-Ann Fabrics |
| Mercer Square Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA | 40% | 2005 | 1988 | - | 91 | 93.2% | 22.73 | Weis Markets |
| Newtown Square Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA | 40% | 2005 | 2020 | 20,000 | 142 | 92.5% | 19.80 | Acme Markets, Michael's |
| Warwick Square Shopping Center | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | PA | 40% | 2005 | 1999 | - | 93 | 40.4% | 27.74 |  |
| Indigo Square | Charleston-North Charleston | SC |  | 2017 | 2017 | - | 51 | 100.0% | 29.98 | Greenwise (Vac 8/29/20) |
| Merchants Village | Charleston-North Charleston | SC | 40% | 1997 | 1997 | 9,000 | 80 | 96.7% | 17.65 | Publix |
| Harpeth Village Fieldstone | Nashville-Davota-Murfrees-Franklin | TN |  | 1997 | 1998 | - | 70 | 97.8% | 15.95 | Publix |
| Northlake Village | Nashville-Davota-Murfrees-Franklin | TN |  | 2000 | 2013 | - | 135 | 99.0% | 15.46 | Kroger |
| Peartree Village | Nashville-Davota-Murfrees-Franklin | TN |  | 1997 | 1997 | - | 110 | 100.0% | 20.33 | Kroger, PETCO |
| Hancock | Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown | TX |  | 1999 | 1998 | - | 263 | 98.1% | 19.39 | 24 Hour Fitness, Firestone Complete Auto Care, H.E.B., PETCO, Twin Liquors |
| Market at Round Rock | Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown | TX |  | 1999 | 1987 | - | 123 | 97.3% | 19.82 | Sprout's Markets, Office Depot, Tuesday Morning |
| North Hills | Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown | TX |  | 1999 | 1995 | - | 164 | 100.0% | 21.88 | H.E.B. |
| Shops at Mira Vista | Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown | TX |  | 2014 | 2002 | 179 | 68 | 100.0% | 25.31 | Trader Joe's, Champions Westlake Gymnastics & Cheer |
| Tech Ridge Center | Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown | TX |  | 2011 | 2020 | 715 | 216 | 99.5% | 23.81 | H.E.B., Pantrack, Baylor Scott & White |
| Bethany Park Place | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1998 | 1998 | 10,200 | 99 | 98.6% | 11.97 | Kroger |
| CityLine Market | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 2014 | 2014 | - | 81 | 100.0% | 29.90 | Whole Foods |
| CityLine Market Phase II | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 2015 | 2015 | - | 22 | 100.0% | 28.18 | CVS |
| Hillcrest Village | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1999 | 1991 | - | 15 | 100.0% | 49.88 |  |

55

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Owner-ship Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leasable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent PSF (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Keller Town Center | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1999 | 2014 | - | 120 | 95.8% | 17.10 | Tom Thumb |
| Lebanon/Legacy Center | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 2000 | 2002 | - | 56 | 87.2% | 29.35 | (WalMart) |
| Market at Preston Forest | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1999 | 1990 | - | 96 | 100.0% | 22.53 | Tom Thumb |
| Mockingbird Commons | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1999 | 1987 | - | 120 | 95.4% | 19.99 | Tom Thumb, Ogle School of Hair Design |
| Preston Oaks (6) | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 2013 | 2022 | - | 103 | 100.0% | 40.03 | Central Market, Talbots |
| Prestonbrook | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 92 | 100.0% | 15.45 | Kroger |
| Shiloh Springs | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | TX |  | 1998 | 1998 | - | 110 | 89.8% | 14.77 | Kroger |
| Alden Bridge | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2002 | 1998 | 26,000 | 139 | 96.8% | 21.81 | Kroger, Walgreens |
| Baybrook East (7) | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 50% | 2020 | 2021 | 2,683 | 156 | 93.9% | 13.17 | H.E.B. |
| Cochran's Crossing | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2002 | 1994 | - | 138 | 100.0% | 20.43 | Kroger |
| Indian Springs Center | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2002 | 2003 | - | 137 | 99.0% | 25.46 | H.E.B. |
| Market at Springwoods Village | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 53% | 2016 | 2018 | 4,250 | 167 | 99.1% | 17.73 | Kroger |
| Panther Creek | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2002 | 1994 | - | 166 | 98.8% | 24.71 | CVS, The Woodlands Childrens Museum, Fitness Project |
| Southpark at Cinco Ranch | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2012 | 2017 | - | 265 | 98.9% | 14.06 | Kroger, Academy Sports, PETCO, Spec's Liquor and Finer Foods |
| Sterling Ridge | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2002 | 2000 | - | 129 | 98.9% | 22.16 | Kroger, CVS |
| Sweetwater Plaza | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 20% | 2001 | 2000 | 20,000 | 134 | 95.3% | 18.46 | Kroger, Walgreens |
| The Village at Riverstone | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2016 | 2016 | - | 165 | 96.3% | 17.11 | Kroger |
| Weslayan Plaza East | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 40% | 2005 | 1969 | - | 169 | 96.1% | 21.11 | Berings, Ross Dress for Less, Michaels, The Next Level Fitness, Spec's Liquor, Trek Bicycle |
| Weslayan Plaza West | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 40% | 2005 | 1969 | 32,629 | 186 | 92.6% | 22.20 | Randalls Food, Walgreens, PETCO, Jo-Ann's, Tuesday Morning, Homegoods |
| Westwood Village | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX |  | 2006 | 2006 | - | 187 | 97.7% | 20.47 | Fitness Project, PetSmart, Office Max, Ross Dress For Less, TJ Maxx, (Target) |
| Woodway Collection | Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land | TX | 40% | 2005 | 2012 | 7,482 | 97 | 94.2% | 31.73 | Whole Foods |
| Carytown Exchange | Richmond | VA | 65% | 2018 | 2022 | - | 116 | 86.2% | 26.91 | Publix, CVS |
| Hanover Village Shopping Center | Richmond | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1971 | - | 90 | 100.0% | 9.81 | Aldi, Tractor Supply Company, Harbor Freight Tools, Tuesday Morning |
| Village Shopping Center | Richmond | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1948 | 24,250 | 116 | 88.8% | 24.99 | Publix, CVS |
| Ashburn Farm Village Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1996 | - | 92 | 100.0% | 17.33 | Patel Brothers, The Shop Gym |
| Belmont Chase | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | - | 2014 | 2014 | - | 91 | 98.3% | 33.98 | Cooper's Hawk Winery, Whole Foods |
| Braenar Village Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 25% | 2004 | 2004 | - | 104 | 100.0% | 23.68 | Safeway |
| Centre Ridge Marketplace | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1996 | 11,640 | 107 | 100.0% | 20.82 | United States Coast Guard Ex, Planet Fitness |
| Festival at Manchester Lakes | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 2021 | - | 168 | 88.2% | 31.72 | Amazon Fresh, Homesense |
| Fox Mill Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 2013 | 22,500 | 103 | 94.2% | 26.79 | Giant |
| Greenbriar Town Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1972 | 76,200 | 340 | 98.1% | 28.93 | Big Blue Swim School, Bob's Discount Furniture, CVS, Giant, Marshalls, Planet Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Total Wine and More |
| Kamp Washington Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1960 | - | 71 | 89.3% | 31.99 | PGA Tour Superstore |
| Kings Park Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 2015 | 21,800 | 96 | 100.0% | 33.57 | Giant, CVS |
| Lorton Station Marketplace | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 20% | 2006 | 2005 | 7,300 | 136 | 66.9% | 27.18 | Amazon Fresh |
| Point 50 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | - | 2007 | 2021 | - | 48 | 100.0% | 32.34 | Amazon Fresh |
| Saratoga Shopping Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1977 | 22,800 | 113 | 97.0% | 21.62 | Giant |
| Shops at County Center | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | - | 2005 | 2005 | - | 97 | 98.3% | 18.84 | Harris Teeter, Planet Fitness |
| The Crossing Clarendon | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA |  | 2016 | 2001 | - | 420 | 90.1% | 38.84 | Whole Foods, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store, Barnes & Noble, Pottery Barn, Ethan Allen, The Cheesecake Factory, Life Time Fitness |

96

| Property Name | CBSA (1) | State | Ownership Interest (2) | Year Acquired | Year Constructed or Last Major Renovation | Mortgages or Encumbrances (in 000's) | Gross Leaseable Area (GLA) (in 000's) | Percent Leased (3) | Average Base Rent (PSF) (4) | Major Tenant(s) (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| The Field at Commonwealth | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA |  | 2017 | 2018 | - | 167 | 99.0% | 22.44 | Wegmans |
| Village Center at Dulles | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 20% | 2002 | 1991 | 48,000 | 304 | 94.9% | 25.48 | Giant, Gold's Gym, CVS, Advance Auto Parts, Chuck E. Cheese, HomeGoods, Goodwill, Furniture Max |
| Williston Centre I | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 1952 | - | 105 | 91.2% | 28.34 | CVS, Fashion K City |
| Williston Centre II | Washington-Arlington-Alexandri | VA | 40% | 2005 | 2010 | 24,419 | 136 | 100.0% | 27.97 | Safeway, (Target), (PerSmart) |
| 6401 Roosevelt | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2019 | 1929 | - | 8 | 100.0% | 25.29 | Safeway, TJ Maxx |
| Aurora Marketplace | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 40% | 2005 | 1991 | 13,400 | 107 | 100.0% | 18.75 | LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Trader Joe's |
| Ballard Blocks I | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 50% | 2018 | 2007 | - | 132 | 97.7% | 27.68 | Bright Horizons, Kaiser Permanente, PCC Community Markets, Prokama, Trufusion, West Marine |
| Ballard Blocks II | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 50% | 2018 | 2018 | - | 117 | 98.4% | 34.81 | Gold's Gym, Mosaic Salon Group, Quality Food Centers |
| Broadway Market | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 20% | 2014 | 1988 | 21,500 | 140 | 92.3% | 28.93 | Big 5 Sporting Goods, Big Lots, Dollar Tree, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Planet Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Safeway, Aaron's |
| Cascade Plaza | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 20% | 1999 | 1999 | - | 206 | 97.9% | 12.79 | Safeway, Rite Aid |
| Eastgate Plaza | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 40% | 2005 | 2021 | 22,000 | 85 | 96.5% | 31.69 | Bevmo!, Dick's Sporting Goods, Marshalls, Regal Cinemas, Safeway, Ulta |
| Grand Ridge Plaza | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2012 | 2018 | - | 331 | 99.6% | 25.96 | Safeway, Rite Aid |
| Inglewood Plaza | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 1999 | 1985 | - | 17 | 100.0% | 45.41 | Safeway, Rite Aid |
| Island Village | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2022 | 2013 | - | 106 | 100.0% | 16.15 | (QFC) |
| Kilbuck Shopping Center | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2016 | 1998 | - | 67 | 86.2% | 37.42 | Marshalls, Bevmo!, Amazon Go Grocery |
| Melrose Market | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2019 | 2009 | - | 21 | 87.2% | 36.32 | Quality Food Centers, Rite Aid |
| Overlake Fashion Plaza | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA | 40% | 2005 | 2020 | - | 87 | 100.0% | 29.55 | Whole Foods, Bartell, Guitar Center, LA Fitness |
| Pine Lake Village | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 1999 | 1989 | - | 103 | 98.8% | 26.49 | Trader Joe's, Bartell Drugs, (Safeway) |
| Roosevelt Square | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 2017 | 2017 | - | 150 | 96.6% | 27.63 | (Target) |
| Sammamish-Highlands | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 1999 | 2013 | - | 101 | 97.2% | 37.98 |  |
| Southcenter | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | WA |  | 1999 | 1990 | - | 58 | 94.9% | 33.16 |  |
| Regency Centers Total |  |  |  |  |  | $1,883,098 | 51,145 | 94.8% | $23.77 |  |

(1) CBSA refers to Core-Based Statistical Area (e.g. metropolitan area).

(2) Represents our percentage ownership interest in the property, if not wholly-owned.

(3) Percentages also include properties where we have not yet incurred at least 90% of the expected costs to complete development and the property is not yet 95% occupied or the anchor has not yet been open for at least two years ("development properties" or "properties in development"). However, if development properties were excluded, the total percent leased would be 94.9% for our Combined Portfolio of shopping centers.

(4) Average base rent PSF is calculated based on annual minimum contractual base rent per the tenant lease, excluding percentage rent and recovery revenue.

(5) Retailers in parenthesis are shadow anchors at our shopping centers. We have no ownership or leasehold interest in their space, which is within or adjacent to our property.

(6) The ground underlying the building and improvements is not owned by Regency or its unconsolidated real estate partnerships, but is subject to a ground lease.

(7) Property in development.

3

### Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation, nor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of which would, in our judgment based on information currently available to us, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any threatened or pending legal proceedings.

### Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

## PART II

### Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol 'REG.'

As of February 06, 2023, there were 87,993 holders of our common stock.

We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to Regency Centers Corporation's common stockholders. Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by our operating results, our financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, future business prospects, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. In order to maintain Regency Centers Corporation's qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are generally required to make annual distributions equal to at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income for the taxable year. Under certain circumstances we could be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distributions in order to meet such requirements. We have a dividend reinvestment plan under which our shareholders may elect to reinvest their dividends automatically in common stock. Under the plan, we may elect to purchase common stock in the open market on behalf of shareholders or may issue new common stock to such stockholders.

Under the revolving credit agreement of our Line, in the event of any monetary default, we may not make distributions to stockholders except to the extent necessary to maintain our REIT status.

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2022.

The following table represents information with respect to purchases by Regency of its common stock by months during the three month period ended December 31, 2022:

| Period | Total number of shares purchased (1) | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs (2) | Average price paid per share | Maximum number or approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| October 1, 2022, through October 31, 2022 | 169 | - | $54.36 | $174,607,162 |
| November 1, 2022, through November 30, 2022 | - | - | $ - | $174,607,162 |
| December 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022 | - | - | $ - | $174,607,162 |

$^{(1)}$ Represents shares repurchased to cover payment of withholding taxes in connection with restricted stock vesting by participants under Regency's Long-Term Omnibus Plan.

$^{(2)}$ On February 3, 2021, our Board authorized a common share repurchase program (Authorized Repurchase Program) under which we could purchase, from time to time, up to a maximum of $250 million of shares of its outstanding common stock through open market purchases, and/or in privately negotiated transactions. Any shares purchased, if not retired, would be treated as treasury shares. During the year ended December 31, 2022, 1.3 million shares were repurchased and retired under this program, and $174.6 million remained available for repurchase. This previously authorized program expired on February 3, 2023. On February 8, 2023, our Board authorized a new common share repurchase program under which we may purchase, from time to time, up to a maximum of $250 million of our outstanding common stock through open market purchases, and/or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and price of share repurchases, if any, will be dependent upon market conditions and other factors. Any shares repurchased, if not retired, will be treated as treasury shares. This new authorization will expire February 7, 2025, unless modified or earlier terminated by the Board.

38

The performance graph furnished below shows Regency's cumulative total stockholder return relative to the S&P 500 Index, the FTSE Nareit Equity REIT Index, and the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers index since December 31, 2017. The following performance graph and table do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

# COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Regency Centers Corporation, the S&P 500 Index, the FTSE Nareit Equity REITs Index and the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

-□- Regency Centers Corporation

---

△--- S&P 500

-○- FTSE Nareit Equity REITs

-×- FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers

*$100 invested on 12/31/17 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright© 2023 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.

|  | 12/31/17 | 12/31/18 | 12/31/19 | 12/31/20 | 12/31/21 | 12/31/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Regency Centers Corporation | $100.00 | 87.98 | 98.03 | 74.59 | 127.84 | 110.51 |
| S&P 500 | 100.00 | 95.62 | 125.72 | 148.85 | 191.58 | 156.89 |
| FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs | 100.00 | 95.38 | 120.17 | 110.56 | 158.36 | 119.78 |
| FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers | 100.00 | 85.45 | 106.84 | 77.31 | 127.60 | 111.60 |

Item 6. [Reserved]

39

# Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

# Executing on our Strategy

During the year ended December 31, 2022, we had Net income attributable to common stockholders of $482.9 million, which includes gains on sale of real estate of $109.0 million, as compared to $361.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

During the year ended December 31, 2022:

- Our Pro-rata same property NOI, excluding termination fees, grew 2.9%, primarily attributable to continued improvement in collections of lease income from cash basis tenants, combined with improvements in base rent from increases in year over year occupancy rates, contractual rent steps in existing leases, and positive rent spreads on new and renewal leases.
- We executed 1,981 new and renewal leasing transactions representing 7.3 million Pro-rata SF with positive trailing 12 month rent spreads of 7.4% during 2022, compared to 1,979 leasing transactions representing 7.0 million Pro-rata SF with positive trailing 12 month rent spreads of 5.5% in 2021. Rent spreads are calculated on all executed leasing transactions for comparable Retail Operating Property spaces, including spaces vacant greater than 12 months.
- At December 31, 2022, our total property portfolio was 94.8% leased while our same property portfolio was 95.1% leased, compared to 94.1% and 94.3%, respectively, at December 31, 2021.

We continued our development and redevelopment of high quality shopping centers:

- Estimated Pro-rata project costs of our current in process development and redevelopment projects totaled $300.9 million compared to $307.3 million at December 31, 2021.
- Development and redevelopment projects completed during 2022 represented $122.0 million of estimated net project costs, with an average stabilized yield of 7%.

We maintained liquidity and financial flexibility to cost effectively fund investment opportunities and debt maturities:

- During April 2022, we settled and issued 984,618 common shares under forward sale agreements at a weighted-average price of $65.78, before any underwriting discount and offering expenses. Net proceeds received at settlement were approximately $61.3 million and were used to fund acquisitions.
- During June 2022, we executed multiple trades to purchase 1,294,201 common shares under the Authorized Repurchase Program for a total of $75.4 million at a weighted average price of $58.25 per share. All repurchased shares were retired on the respective settlement dates.
- We have no unsecured debt maturities until 2024 and just over $110 million of secured mortgage maturities in 2023, including mortgages within our real estate partnerships.
- At December 31, 2022, our Pro-rata net debt-to-operating EBITDAre ratio on a trailing 12 month basis was 5.0x compared to 5.1x at December 31, 2021.

# Leasing Activity and Significant Tenants

We believe our high-quality, grocery anchored shopping centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics create attractive spaces for retail and service providers to operate their businesses.

# Pro-rata Percent Leased

The following table summarizes Pro-rata percent leased of our combined consolidated and unconsolidated shopping center portfolio:

|  | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Percent Leased - All properties | 94.8% | 94.1% |
| Anchor Space (spaces ≥ 10,000 SF) | 96.8% | 97.0% |
| Shop Space (spaces < 10,000 SF) | 91.5% | 89.2% |

Our percent leased increased primarily due to favorable leasing activity in our Shop Space category during 2022.

40

### *Pro-rata Leasing Activity*

The following table summarizes leasing activity, including our Pro-rata share of activity within the portfolio of our co-investment partnerships (totals as a weighted-average PSF):

|  | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Leasing Transactions | SF (in thousands) | Base Rent PSF | Tenant Allowance and Landlord Work PSF | Leasing Commissions PSF |
| Anchor Space Leases |  |  |  |  |  |
| New | 24 | 632 | $15.09 | $24.36 | $5.32 |
| Renewal | 108 | 3,252 | 16.36 | 1.07 | 0.23 |
| Total Anchor Space Leases | 132 | 3,884 | $16.16 | $4.86 | $1.06 |
| Shop Space Leases |  |  |  |  |  |
| New | 562 | 1,058 | $37.55 | $36.17 | $11.48 |
| Renewal | 1,287 | 2,395 | 35.94 | 1.66 | 0.77 |
| Total Shop Space Leases | 1,849 | 3,453 | $36.44 | $12.23 | $4.05 |
| Total Leases | 1,981 | 7,337 | $25.70 | $8.33 | $2.47 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, 2021 |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Leasing Transactions | SF (in thousands) | Base Rent PSF | Tenant Allowance and Landlord Work PSF | Leasing Commissions PSF |
| Anchor Space Leases |  |  |  |  |  |
| New | 25 | 667 | $20.10 | $44.50 | $6.18 |
| Renewal | 124 | 2,941 | 15.34 | 0.56 | 0.21 |
| Total Anchor Space Leases | 149 | 3,608 | $16.22 | $8.68 | $1.31 |
| Shop Space Leases |  |  |  |  |  |
| New | 573 | 1,022 | $34.38 | $28.77 | $10.87 |
| Renewal | 1,257 | 2,324 | 34.31 | 1.62 | 0.79 |
| Total Shop Space Leases | 1,830 | 3,346 | $34.33 | $9.92 | $3.87 |
| Total Leases | 1,979 | 6,954 | $24.93 | $9.28 | $2.54 |

The weighted-average base rent PSF on signed Shop Space leases during 2022 was $36.44 PSF, which is higher than the weighted average annual base rent PSF of all Shop Space leases due to expire during the next 12 months of $34.76 PSF. New and renewal rent spreads, as compared to prior rents on these same spaces leased, were positive at 7.4% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 5.5% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2021.

The success of our tenants in operating their businesses and their corresponding ability to pay us rent continue to be significantly impacted by many current economic challenges, which increase their cost of doing business, including, but not limited to, inflation, labor shortages, supply chain constraints, increasing energy prices and interest rates. Additionally, macroeconomic and geopolitical risks create challenges that may exacerbate current market conditions in the United States.

These economic conditions could adversely impact our volume of leasing activity, leasing spreads, and financial results generally, as well as adversely affect the business and financial results of our tenants. The aggregate impacts of these current economic challenges may also negatively affect the overall market for retail space, resulting in decreased demand for space in our centers. This, in turn, could result in downward pressure on rents that we are able to charge to new or renewing tenants, such that future spreads could be adversely impacted. Further, we may experience higher costs for tenant buildouts, as costs of materials and labor may increase and supply and availability of both may become more limited.

41

### *Significant Tenants and Concentrations of Risk*

We seek to reduce our operating and leasing risks through geographic diversification of our properties, as seen in 'Item 2. *Properties*' of this Report. We seek to avoid dependence on any single property, market, or tenant. Based on percentage of annualized base rent, the following table summarizes our most significant tenants, of which four of the top five are grocers:

| Anchor | December 31, 2022 |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Number of Stores | Percentage of Company-owned GLA (1) | Percentage of Annual Base Rent (1) |
| Publix | 67 | 7.0% | 3.2% |
| Kroger Co. | 53 | 7.3% | 3.1% |
| Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 46 | 4.7% | 3.0% |
| Amazon/Whole Foods | 36 | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| TJX Companies, Inc. | 63 | 3.6% | 2.6% |

$^{(1)}$ Includes Regency's Pro-rata share of unconsolidated properties and excludes those owned by anchors.

### *Bankruptcies and Credit Concerns*

Our management team devotes significant time to researching and monitoring consumer preferences and trends, customer shopping behaviors, changes in delivery methods, shifts to e-commerce, and changing demographics in order to anticipate the challenges and opportunities impacting our industry. We seek to mitigate these potential impacts through maintaining a high quality portfolio, tenant diversification, replacing weaker tenants with stronger operators, anchoring our centers with market leading grocery stores that drive customer traffic, and maintaining our presence in suburban trade areas with compelling demographic populations benefiting from high levels of disposal income. The potential for a recession and the severity and duration of any economic downturn could negatively impact our existing tenants and their ability to continue to meet their lease obligations.

Although base rent is derived from long-term lease contracts, tenants that file bankruptcy generally have the legal right to reject any or all of their leases and close related stores. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt tenant for unpaid rent might be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold. Additionally, we may incur significant expense to adjudicate our claim and significant downtime to re-lease the vacated space. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers files bankruptcy and cancels its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues. Tenants who are currently in bankruptcy and continue to occupy space in our shopping centers represent an aggregate of 0.5% of our annual base rent on a Pro-rata basis.

### **Results from Operations**

The United States is currently experiencing high levels of inflation. Inflation, as well as other ongoing changes in economic conditions such as labor shortages, employee retention costs, increased material and shipping costs, higher interest rates, and supply chain constraints have spurred a rise in wages and increased operating costs and challenges for our tenants and us.

Substantially all of our long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on our operations by requiring tenants to pay their Pro-rata share of operating expenses, including common-area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance, and utilities at our centers. Over half of our leases are for terms of less than ten years, primarily for Shop Space, which permits us to seek increased rents upon re-rental at market rates. However, our success in passing through increases in our operating expenses to our tenants is dependent on the tenants' ability to absorb and pay these increases. Additionally, increases in operating expenses passed through to our tenants, without a corresponding increase in our tenants' profitability, may limit our ability to grow base rent as tenants look to manage their total occupancy costs.

42

# *Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:*

Revenues changed as summarized in the following table:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lease income |  |  |  |
| Base rent | $821,755 | 765,941 | 55,814 |
| Recoveries from tenants | 280,658 | 258,596 | 22,062 |
| Percentage rent | 9,635 | 6,601 | 3,034 |
| Uncollectible lease income | 13,841 | 23,481 | (9,640) |
| Other lease income | 14,748 | 16,021 | (1,273) |
| Straight-line rent | 24,272 | 18,189 | 6,083 |
| Above / below market rent amortization | 22,543 | 24,539 | (1,996) |
| Total lease income | $1,187,452 | 1,113,368 | 74,084 |
| Other property income | 10,719 | 12,456 | (1,737) |
| Management, transaction, and other fees | 25,851 | 40,337 | (14,486) |
| Total revenues | $1,224,022 | 1,166,161 | 57,861 |

Lease income increased $74.1 million, driven by the following contractually billable components of rent to the tenants per the lease agreements:

- • \$55.8 million increase from billable Base rent, as follows:
  - o \$19.4 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties;
  - o \$1.5 million increase from rent commencing at development properties; and
  - o \$42.3 million net increase from same properties, including a \$13.8 million increase related to our acquisition and resulting consolidation of the 11 properties previously held in unconsolidated partnerships during 2021 and a portion of 2022, and a \$28.5 million net increase in the remaining same properties due to increases from occupancy, rent steps in existing leases, and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases, as well as redevelopment projects completing and operating; partially offset by
  - o \$7.3 million decrease from the sale of operating properties.
- • \$22.1 million increase from contractual Recoveries from tenants, which represents the tenants' proportionate share of the operating, maintenance, insurance and real estate tax expenses that we incur to operate our shopping centers. Recoveries from tenants increased, on a net basis, from the following:
  - o \$8.5 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties and rent commencing at development properties; and
  - o \$15.8 million net increase from same properties due to higher operating costs in the current year and greater recovery of those expenses from tenants; partially offset by
  - o \$2.2 million decrease from the sale of operating properties.
- • \$3.0 million increase in Percentage rent primarily due to improved tenant sales.
- • \$9.6 million decrease from changes in Uncollectible lease income.
  - o During 2022, Uncollectible lease income was a net positive \$13.8 million driven by \$18.7 million in collections of prior year reserves on cash basis tenants partially offset by \$4.9 million in reserve recognition on current year billings.
  - o During 2021, Uncollectible lease income was a net positive \$23.5 million driven by \$42.0 million in collections of prior year reserves on cash basis tenants partially offset by \$18.5 million in reserve recognition on current year billings.
- • \$1.3 million decrease in Other lease income primarily due to a decrease in lease termination fees.

43

- $6.1 million increase in Straight-line rent.
  - During 2022, Straight-line rent was $24.3 million, driven by $11.8 million of new straight-line rents and $14.8 million of reinstated straight-line rents from returning tenants to accrual basis of accounting, partially offset by $2.3 million of uncollectible straight-line rents on cash basis tenants.
  - During 2021, Straight-line rent was $18.2 million, driven by $13.0 million of new straight-line rents and $11.4 million of reinstated straight-line rents from returning tenants to accrual basis of accounting, partially offset by $6.2 million of uncollectible straight-line rents on cash basis tenants.
- $2.0 million decrease in Above and below market rent primarily from same properties driven by the timing of lease activity on acquired in-place tenant leases.

Other property income decreased $1.7 million primarily due to a decrease in settlements, which were higher in 2021.

Management, transaction, and other fees decreased $14.5 million primarily due to $13.6 million of promote income recognized during 2021 for our performance as managing member of the USAA partnership, as well as a decrease in asset and property management fees resulting from a smaller portfolio of properties within our co-investment partnerships following the sale of several properties to third parties or the purchase and consolidation by Regency.

Changes in our operating expenses are summarized in the following table:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Depreciation and amortization | $319,697 | 303,331 | 16,366 |
| Property operating expense | 196,148 | 184,553 | 11,595 |
| Real estate taxes | 149,795 | 142,129 | 7,666 |
| General and administrative | 79,903 | 78,218 | 1,685 |
| Other operating expenses | 6,166 | 5,751 | 415 |
| Total operating expenses | $751,709 | 713,982 | 37,727 |

Depreciation and amortization costs increased $16.4 million, on a net basis, as follows:

- $830,000 increase from development properties where tenant spaces became available for occupancy, partially offset by decreases in corporate asset depreciation;
- $13.7 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties; and
- $4.1 million increase from same properties, primarily related to redevelopment projects; partially offset by
- $2.3 million decrease from the sale of operating properties.

Property operating expense increased $11.6 million, on a net basis, as follows:

- $804,000 increase from development properties where tenant spaces became available for occupancy;
- $5.3 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties; and
- $9.4 million net increase from same properties, including $3.1 million increase related to our acquisition and resulting consolidation of the eleven properties previously held in unconsolidated partnerships during 2021 and a portion of 2022, with the remaining increase primarily attributable to higher insurance premiums, increases in costs associated with general property maintenance and tenant utilities as our centers return to customary operating levels, and additional management fees; partially offset by
- $3.9 million decrease from the sale of operating properties.

Real estate taxes increased $7.7 million, on a net basis, as follows:

- $680,000 increase from developments where capitalization ceased and spaces became available for occupancy;
- $4.7 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties; and
- $4.4 million increase at same properties, including a $2.4 million increase related to our acquisition and resulting consolidation of the eleven properties previously held in unconsolidated partnerships during 2021 and a portion of 2022; partially offset by
- $2.1 million decrease from the sale of operating properties.

44

General and administrative costs increased $1.7 million, on a net basis, as follows:

- $8.2 million net increase in compensation costs primarily driven by performance based incentive compensation and annual base salary increases;
- $3.7 million net increase in other corporate overhead costs primarily driven by travel and entertainment returning to customary levels post-pandemic; and
- $449,000 increase due to lower development overhead capitalization based on the status and progress of our development and redevelopment projects; partially offset by
- $10.7 million net decrease due to changes in the value of participant obligations within the deferred compensation plan, attributable to changes in market values of those investments, reflected within Net investment income.

The following table presents the components of Other expense (income):

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Interest expense, net |  |  |  |
| Interest on notes payable | $148,803 | 147,439 | 1,364 |
| Interest on unsecured credit facilities | 2,058 | 2,119 | (61) |
| Capitalized interest | (4,166) | (4,202) | 36 |
| Hedge expense | 438 | 438 | - |
| Interest income | (947) | (624) | (323) |
| Interest expense, net | 146,186 | 145,170 | 1,016 |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 84,389 | (84,389) |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (109,005) | (91,119) | (17,886) |
| Net investment (income) loss | 6,921 | (5,463) | 12,384 |
| Total other expense (income) | $44,102 | 132,977 | (88,875) |

The $1.0 million net increase in interest expense was primarily driven by an increase in mortgage interest expense from assumed loans on recently acquired properties. We expect that refinancing our debt at maturity or borrowing on our variable rate Line, in the current interest rate environment, could result in higher interest expense in future periods if interest rates remain elevated.

During 2021, we recognized $84.4 million of impairment losses resulting from the impairment of two operating properties.

During 2022, we recognized gains on sale of $109.0 million from five land parcels and two operating properties. During 2021, we recognized gains on sale of $91.1 million from five land parcels and six operating properties.

Net investment income decreased $12.4 million, to a Net investment loss of $6.9 million, primarily driven by unrealized losses during 2022 of investments held in the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and our captive insurance company. There is an offsetting $10.7 million benefit in General and administrative costs related to participant obligations within the deferred compensation plans.

Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships changed as follows:

| (in thousands) | Regency's Ownership | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GRI - Regency, LLC ("GRIR") | 40.00% | $35,819 | 34,655 | 1,164 |
| Equity One JV Portfolio LLC ("NYC") (1) | 30.00% | 9,173 | 315 | 8,858 |
| Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC ("Columbia I") | 20.00% | 1,817 | 1,976 | (159) |
| Columbia Regency Partners II, LLC ("Columbia II") | 20.00% | 1,735 | 10,987 | (9,252) |
| Columbia Village District, LLC | 30.00% | 1,669 | 1,522 | 147 |
| RegCal, LLC ("RegCal") (2) | 25.00% | 4,499 | 2,058 | 2,441 |
| US Regency Retail I, LLC ("USAA") (3) | 20.01% | - | 631 | (631) |
| Other investments in real estate partnerships | 35.00% - 50.00% | 5,112 | (5,058) | 10,170 |
| Total equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships |  | $59,824 | 47,086 | 12,738 |

(1) On May 25, 2022, the NYC partnership sold its remaining two properties and distributed sales proceeds to is members. Dissolution will follow final distributions, which are expected in 2023.

(2) On April 1, 2022, we acquired our partner's 75% share in four properties held in the RegCal partnership for a total purchase price of $88.5 million; therefore, results following the date of acquisition are included in consolidated results. A single operating property remains within RegCal, LLC, at December 31, 2022.

(3) On August 1, 2021, we acquired our partner's 80% interest in the seven properties held in the USAA partnership; therefore, results following the date of acquisition are included in consolidated results.

45

The $12.7 million increase in our Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships was largely attributable to the following changes:

- $1.2 million increase within GRIR, primarily due to an increase in base rent across the portfolio from higher occupancy and rent growth;
- $8.9 million increase within NYC, primarily due to gains on the sale of two operating properties during 2022, as well as an increase from the loss on sale of an operating property during 2021;
- $9.3 million decrease within Columbia II, primarily due to gains on sale of one operating property during 2021;
- $2.4 million increase within RegCal, primarily due to gain on sale of one operating property during 2022; and
- $10.2 million increase within Other investments in real estate partnerships, primarily from the impairment of a single property partnership that sold during 2021.

The following represents the remaining components that comprise Net income attributable to common stockholders and unit holders:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net income | $488,035 | 366,288 | 121,747 |
| Income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (5,170) | (4,877) | (293) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $482,865 | 361,411 | 121,454 |
| Net income attributable to exchangeable operating partnership units | 2,105 | 1,615 | 490 |
| Net income attributable to common unit holders | $484,970 | 363,026 | 121,944 |

*Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:*

For a comparison of our results from operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, see "Part II, Item 7. *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022.

### **Supplemental Earnings Information**

We use certain non-GAAP measures, in addition to certain performance metrics determined under GAAP, as we believe these measures improve the understanding of our operating results. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to our Board of Directors, management and investors regarding certain trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, purposes of determining management incentive compensation and budgeting, forecasting and planning purposes. We provide Pro-rata financial information because we believe it assists investors and analysts in estimating our economic interest in our consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships, when read in conjunction with our reported results under GAAP. We believe presenting our Pro-rata share of operating results, along with other non-GAAP measures, may assist in comparing our operating results to other REITs. We continually evaluate the usefulness, relevance, limitations, and calculation of our reported non-GAAP measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the public, and thus such reported non-GAAP measures could change. See "Defined Terms" in "Item 1. *Business*" for additional information regarding the definition of and other information regarding the non-GAAP measures we present in this Report.

We do not consider non-GAAP measures an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, rather they supplement GAAP measures by providing additional information we believe to be useful to shareholders. The principal limitation of these non-GAAP measures is they may exclude significant expense and income items that are required by GAAP to be recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, they reflect the exercise of management's judgment about which expense and income items are excluded or included in determining these non-GAAP measures. In order to compensate for these limitations, reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures we use to their most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided, including as set forth below. Non-GAAP measures should not be relied upon in evaluating our financial condition, results of operations, or future prospects.

46

## **Pro-rata Same Property NOI:**

Pro-rata same property NOI, excluding termination fees/expenses, changed from the following major components:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real estate revenues: |  |  |  |
| Base rent | $892,253 | 861,382 | 30,871 |
| Recoveries from tenants | 302,171 | 292,319 | 9,852 |
| Percentage rent | 11,004 | 7,701 | 3,303 |
| Termination fees | 5,007 | 6,734 | (1,727) |
| Uncollectible lease income | 14,816 | 25,734 | (10,918) |
| Other lease income | 11,847 | 11,556 | 291 |
| Other property income | 8,338 | 9,863 | (1,525) |
| Total real estate revenue | 1,245,436 | 1,215,289 | 30,147 |
| Real estate operating expenses: |  |  |  |
| Operating and maintenance | 197,481 | 190,017 | 7,464 |
| Real estate taxes | 159,189 | 159,620 | (431) |
| Ground rent | 11,761 | 11,829 | (68) |
| Total real estate operating expenses | 368,431 | 361,466 | 6,965 |
| Pro-rata same property NOI | $877,005 | 853,823 | 23,182 |
| Less: Termination fees / expense | 5,007 | 6,734 | (1,727) |
| Pro-rata same property NOI, excluding termination fees / expense | $871,998 | 847,089 | 24,909 |
| Pro-rata same property NOI growth, excluding termination fees / expense |  |  | 2.9% |

Real estate revenue increased $30.1 million, on a net basis, as follows:

Base rent increased $30.9 million due to increases from occupancy, rent steps in existing leases, and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases.

Recoveries from tenants increased $9.9 million due to increases in recoverable expenses and greater recovery rates from higher average occupancy.

Percentage rent increased $3.3 million, primarily due to improved tenant sales.

Termination fees decreased $1.7 million primarily due to termination fees from several tenants at various properties during 2021, both wholly owned and within our partnerships.

Uncollectible lease income decreased $10.9 million primarily driven by the higher level of 2021 collections of previously reserved amounts, which have continued but to a lesser degree in 2022.

Other property income decreased $1.5 million primarily due to a decrease in settlements from 2021.

Real estate operating expenses increased $7.0 million, on a net basis, as follows:

Operating and maintenance increased $7.5 million primarily due to increases in insurance and other reimbursable costs.

## **Same Property Roll-forward:**

Our same property pool includes the following property count, Pro-rata GLA, and changes therein:

| (GLA in thousands) | 2022 |  | 2021 |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Property Count | GLA | Property Count | GLA |
| Beginning same property count | 393 | 41,294 | 393 | 40,228 |
| Acquired properties owned for entirety of comparable periods (1) | - | 327 | 2 | 924 |
| Developments that reached completion by beginning of earliest comparable period presented | 1 | 72 | 6 | 683 |
| Disposed properties | (5) | (195) | (8) | (420) |
| SF adjustments (2) | - | (115) | - | (121) |
| Ending same property count | 389 | 41,383 | 393 | 41,294 |

$^{(1)}$ Includes an adjustment to GLA arising from the acquisition of our partners' share of properties previously held in the RegCal and USAA partnerships, of which our previous ownership share was already included in our same property pool.

$^{(2)}$ SF adjustments arising from re-measurements or redevelopments.

47

## Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings:

Our reconciliation of net income attributable to common stock and unit holders to Nareit FFO and to Core Operating Earnings is as follows:

| (in thousands, except share information) | 2022 | 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reconciliation of Net income to Nareit FFO |  |  |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $482,865 | 361,411 |
| Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit FFO: (1) |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization (excluding FF&E) | 344,629 | 330,364 |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 95,815 |
| Gain on sale of real estate | (121,835) | (100,499) |
| Exchangeable operating partnership units | 2,105 | 1,615 |
| Nareit FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders | $707,764 | 688,706 |
| Reconciliation of Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings |  |  |
| Nareit Funds From Operations | $707,764 | 688,706 |
| Adjustments to reconcile to Core Operating Earnings: (1) |  |  |
| Not Comparable Items |  |  |
| Early extinguishment of debt | 176 | - |
| Promote income | - | (13,589) |
| Certain Non Cash Items |  |  |
| Straight-line rent | (11,327) | (13,534) |
| Uncollectible straight-line rent | (14,155) | (5,965) |
| Above/below market rent amortization, net | (21,434) | (23,889) |
| Debt premium/discount amortization | (184) | (565) |
| Core Operating Earnings | $660,840 | 631,164 |

$^{(1)}$ Includes Regency's Pro-rata share of unconsolidated investment partnerships, net of Pro-rata share attributable to noncontrolling interests.

## Reconciliation of Same Property NOI to Nearest GAAP Measure:

Our reconciliation of Net income attributable to common stockholders to Same Property NOI, on a Pro-rata basis, is as follows:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $482,865 | 361,411 |
| Less: |  |  |
| Management, transaction, and other fees | 25,851 | 40,337 |
| Other (1) | 51,090 | 46,860 |
| Plus: |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization | 319,697 | 303,331 |
| General and administrative | 79,903 | 78,218 |
| Other operating expense | 6,166 | 5,751 |
| Other expense | 44,102 | 132,977 |
| Equity in income of investments in real estate excluded from NOI (2) | 35,824 | 53,119 |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5,170 | 4,877 |
| Pro-rata NOI | 896,786 | 852,487 |
| Less non-same property NOI (3) | (19,781) | 1,336 |
| Pro-rata same property NOI | $877,005 | 853,823 |

$^{(1)}$ Includes straight-line rental income and expense, net of reserves, above and below market rent amortization, other fees, and noncontrolling interest.

$^{(2)}$ Includes non-NOI income earned and expenses incurred at our unconsolidated real estate partnerships, including those separated out above for our consolidated properties.

$^{(3)}$ Includes revenues and expenses attributable to non-same properties, sold properties, development properties, and corporate activities. Also includes adjustments for earnings at the four and seven properties we acquired from our former unconsolidated RegCal and USAA partnerships in 2022 and 2021, respectively, in order to calculate growth on a comparable basis for the periods presented.

48

## Liquidity and Capital Resources

### General

We use cash flows generated from operating, investing, and financing activities to strengthen our balance sheet, finance our development and redevelopment projects, fund our investment activities, and maintain financial flexibility. A significant portion of our cash from operations is distributed to our common shareholders in the form of dividends in order to maintain our status as a REIT.

Except for $200 million of private placement debt, our Parent Company has no capital commitments other than its guarantees of the commitments of our Operating Partnership. All remaining debt is held by our Operating Partnership or by our co-investment partnerships. The Operating Partnership is a co-issuer and a guarantor of the $200 million of outstanding debt of our Parent Company. The Parent Company will from time to time access the capital markets for the purpose of issuing new equity, and will simultaneously contribute all of the offering proceeds to the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional partnership units.

We continually assess our available liquidity and our expected cash requirements, including monitoring our tenant rent collections. We have access to and draw on multiple financing sources to fund our operations and our long-term capital needs, including the requirements of our in process and planned developments, redevelopments, and other capital expenditures, and the repayment of debt. We expect to meet these needs by using a combination of the following: cash flow from operations after funding our dividend, borrowings from our Line, proceeds from the sale of real estate, mortgage loan and unsecured bank financing, distributions received from our co-investment partnerships, and when the capital markets are favorable, proceeds from the sale of equity securities or the issuance of new unsecured debt. We continually evaluate alternative financing options, and we believe we can obtain new financing on reasonable terms, although likely at higher interest rates than that of our debt currently outstanding.

We have no unsecured debt maturities in 2023, $250 million of unsecured debt maturing in 2024, and what we believe is a manageable level of secured mortgage maturities during the next 12 months, including those mortgages within our real estate partnerships. Based upon our available cash balance, sources of capital, our current credit ratings, and the number of high quality, unencumbered properties we own, we believe our available capital resources are sufficient to meet our expected capital needs for the next year.

In addition to our $66.5 million of unrestricted cash, we have the following additional sources of capital available:

| (in thousands) | December 31, 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| ATM equity program (see note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) |  |
| Original offering amount | $500,000 |
| Available capacity | $350,363 |
| Line of Credit (see note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) |  |
| Total commitment amount | $1,250,000 |
| Available capacity (1) | $1,240,619 |
| Maturity (2) | March 23, 2025 |

$^{(1)}$ Net of letters of credit.

$^{(2)}$ The Company has the option to extend the maturity for two additional six-month periods.

The declaration of dividends is determined quarterly by our Board of Directors. On February 8, 2023, our Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.65 per share, payable on April 5, 2023, to shareholders of record as of March 15, 2023. While future dividends will be determined at the discretion of our Board of Directors, we plan to continue paying an aggregate amount of distributions to our stock and unit holders that, at a minimum, meet the requirements to continue qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We have historically generated sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our dividend distributions. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we generated cash flow from operations of $655.8 million and $659.4 million, respectively, and paid $430.1 million and $404.9 million in dividends to our common stock and unit holders, respectively.

We currently have development and redevelopment projects in various stages of construction, along with a pipeline of potential projects for future development or redevelopment. After funding our common stock dividend payment in January 2023, we estimate that we will require capital during the next 12 months of approximately $351.4 million related to leasing commissions, tenant improvements, in-process developments and redevelopments, capital contributions to our co-investment partnerships, and repaying maturing debt. These capital requirements are being impacted by current levels of high inflation resulting in increased costs of construction materials, labor, and services from third party contractors and suppliers. In response, we have implemented mitigation strategies such as entering into fixed cost construction contracts, pre-ordering materials, and other planning efforts. Further, continued challenges from permitting delays, labor shortages, and supply chain disruptions may extend the time to completion of these projects.

49

If we start new developments or redevelopments, commit to property acquisitions, repay debt prior to maturity, declare future dividends, or repurchase shares of our common stock, our cash requirements will increase. If we refinance maturing debt, our cash requirements will decrease.

We endeavor to maintain a high percentage of unencumbered assets. As of December 31, 2022, 89.5% of our wholly-owned real estate assets were unencumbered. Our low level of encumbered assets allows us to more readily access the secured and unsecured debt markets and to maintain availability on the Line. Our trailing 12 month fixed charge coverage ratio, including our Pro-rata share of our partnerships, was 4.6x and 4.5x for the periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and our Pro-rata net debt-to-operating EBITDAre ratio on a trailing 12 month basis was 5.0x and 5.1x, respectively, for the same periods.

Our Line and unsecured debt require that we remain in compliance with various covenants, which are described in note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We are in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2022, and expect to remain in compliance. Please also refer to the Risk Factors discussed in Item 1A of Part I herein.

# Summary of Cash Flow Activity

The following table summarizes net cash flows related to operating, investing, and financing activities of the Company:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $655,815 | 659,388 | (3,573) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (206,108) | (286,352) | 80,244 |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (475,958) | (656,459) | 180,501 |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | (26,251) | (283,423) | 257,172 |
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $68,776 | 95,027 | (26,251) |

# Net cash provided by operating activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities changed by $3.6 million due to:

- $10.5 million decrease in operating cash flow distributions from Investments in real estate partnerships attributable to the reduced portfolio within partnerships and the higher distributions in 2021 from collecting past due rents, partially offset by,
- $4.4 million net increase in cash from operations; and
- $2.5 million increase driven by cash used in 2021 to settle interest rate swaps on our term loan which was repaid in January 2021

# Net cash used in investing activities:

Net cash used in investing activities changed by $80.2 million as follows:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |
| Acquisition of operating real estate, net of cash acquired of $3,061 and $2,991 in 2022 and 2021, respectively | $(169,639) | (392,051) | 222,412 |
| Real estate development and capital improvements | (195,418) | (177,631) | (17,787) |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate | 143,133 | 206,193 | (63,060) |
| Collection (issuance) of notes receivable, net | 1,823 | (20) | 1,843 |
| Investments in real estate partnerships | (36,266) | (23,476) | (12,790) |
| Return of capital from investments in real estate partnerships | 48,473 | 99,945 | (51,472) |
| Dividends on investment securities | 1,113 | 813 | 300 |
| Acquisition of investment securities | (21,112) | (23,971) | 2,859 |
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities | 21,785 | 23,846 | (2,061) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | $(206,108) | (286,352) | 80,244 |

Significant changes in investing activities include:

- We paid $169.6 million to purchase seven operating properties during 2022, including four properties in which we previously held a 25% interest through an unconsolidated Investment in real estate partnership. We paid $392.1 million for the acquisition of 12 operating properties during 2021, including seven properties in which we previously held a 20% interest through an unconsolidated Investment in real estate partnership.

50

- We invested $17.8 million more in 2022 than 2021 in real estate development, redevelopment, and capital improvements, as further detailed in the tables below.
- We sold two operating properties, four land parcels, and one development project interest in 2022 for proceeds of $143.1 million compared to seven operating properties and five land parcels in 2021 for proceeds of $206.2 million.
- We collected $1.8 million in notes receivable during 2022.
- We invested $36.3 million in our real estate partnerships during 2022, including:
  - $6.1 million to fund our share of acquiring one operating property within an existing co-investment partnership,
  - $20.2 million to fund our share of secured debt maturities, and
  - $10.0 million to fund our share of development and redevelopment activities.

During the same period in 2021, we invested $23.5 million in our real estate partnerships, including:

- $18.7 million to fund our share of debt refinancing activities, and
- $4.8 million to fund our share of development and redevelopment activities.
- Return of capital from our unconsolidated investments in real estate partnerships includes sales or financing proceeds. The $48.5 million received in 2022 is our share of $11.6 million from debt refinancing activities and $36.9 million from real estate sales. The $99.9 million received in 2021 is our share of $28.1 million proceeds from debt refinancing activities and $71.8 million proceeds from real estate sales.
- Acquisition of securities and proceeds from sale of securities pertain to investment activities held in our captive insurance company and our deferred compensation plan.

We plan to continue developing and redeveloping shopping centers for long-term investment. During 2022, we deployed capital of $195.4 million for the development, redevelopment, and improvement of our real estate properties, comprised of the following:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Capital expenditures: |  |  |  |
| Land acquisitions | $12,484 | 11,820 | 664 |
| Building and tenant improvements | 75,420 | 53,752 | 21,668 |
| Redevelopment costs | 68,730 | 78,056 | (9,326) |
| Development costs | 27,861 | 19,426 | 8,435 |
| Capitalized interest | 4,133 | 4,085 | 48 |
| Capitalized direct compensation | 6,790 | 10,492 | (3,702) |
| Real estate development and capital improvements | $195,418 | 177,631 | 17,787 |

- We paid $12.5 million to acquire one land parcel for development and one land parcel formerly under ground lease at one of our existing centers in 2022, and paid $11.8 million in 2021 to purchase land formerly under ground leases at two of our existing centers.
- Building and tenant improvements increased $21.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily related to the timing of capital projects.
- Redevelopment costs decreased $9.3 million during 2022 due to the timing and magnitude of projects in process. We intend to continuously improve our portfolio of shopping centers through redevelopment which may include adjacent land acquisition, existing building expansion, facade renovation, new out-parcel building construction, and redevelopment related tenant improvement costs. The size and magnitude of each redevelopment project varies with each redevelopment plan. The timing and duration of these projects could also result in volatility in NOI. See the tables below for more details about our redevelopment projects.
- Development costs increased $8.4 million based on the timing and magnitude of our development projects currently in process. See the tables below for more details about our development projects.

51

- Interest is capitalized on our development and redevelopment projects and is based on cumulative actual costs expended. We cease interest capitalization when the property is no longer being developed or is available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but in no event would we capitalize interest on the project beyond 12 months after the anchor opens for business. If we reduce our development and redevelopment activity, the amount of interest that we capitalize may be lower than historical averages.
- We have a staff of employees who directly support our development program, which includes redevelopment of our existing properties. Internal compensation costs directly attributable to these activities are capitalized as part of each project.

The following table summarizes our development projects in-process and completed:

(in thousands, except cost PSF)

| Property Name | Market | Ownership | Start Date | Estimated Stabilization Year (1) | December 31, 2022 |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Estimated / Actual Net Development Costs (2) (3) | GLA (3) | Cost PSF of GLA (2) (3) | % of Costs Incurred |
| Developments In-Process |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Glenwood Green | Old Bridge, NJ | 70% | Q1-22 | 2025 | $45,530 | 248 | $184 | 45% |
| Eastfield at Baybrook - Phase 1B | Houston, TX | 50% | Q2-22 | 2025 | 10,384 | 25 | 415 | 37% |
| Total Developments In-Process |  |  |  |  | $55,914 | 273 | $205 | 44% |
| Developments Completed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Carrytown Exchange - Phase I & II | Richmond, VA | 64% | Q4-18 | 2024 | $29,268 | 74 | $396 |  |
| East San Marco | Jacksonville, FL | 100% | Q4-20 | 2023 | 18,970 | 59 | 322 |  |
| Total Developments Completed |  |  |  |  | $48,238 | 133 | $363 |  |

(1) Estimated Stabilization Year represents the estimated first full calendar year that the project will reach our expected stabilized yield.

(2) Includes leasing costs and is net of tenant reimbursements.

(3) Estimated Net Development Costs and GLA are reported based on Regency's ownership interest in the real estate partnership at completion.

(4) Estimated Net Development Costs for Baybrook East 1A is limited to our ownership interest in the value of land and site improvements to deliver a parcel to a grocer, under a ground lease agreement, to construct their building and improvements. This property is included in our Investments in real estate partnerships.

The following table summarizes our redevelopment projects in-process and completed:

(in thousands)

| Property Name | Market | Ownership | Start Date | Estimated Stabilization Year (1) | December 31, 2022 |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Estimated Incremental Project Costs (2) (3) | GLA (3) | % of Costs Incurred |
| Redevelopments In-Process |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| The Crossing Clarendon | Metro, DC | 100% | Q4-18 | 2024 | $56,002 | 129 | 71% |
| The Abbot | Boston, MA | 100% | Q2-19 | 2024 | 59,033 | 64 | 87% |
| Westbard Square Phase I | Bethesda, MD | 100% | Q2-21 | 2025 | 37,269 | 123 | 47% |
| Buckhead Landing | Atlanta, GA | 100% | Q2-22 | 2025 | 27,709 | 152 | 10% |
| Town & Country Center | Los Angeles, CA | 35% | Q4-22 | 2027 | 24,525 | 51 | 3% |
| Various Properties | Various | 20%-100% | Various | Various | 40,403 | 1,502 | 46% |
| Total Redevelopments In-Process |  |  |  |  | $244,941 | 2,021 | 52% |
| Redevelopments Completed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Sheridan Plaza | Hollywood, FL | 100% | Q3-19 | 2023 | $11,915 | 507 |  |
| Preston Oaks | Dallas, TX | 100% | Q4-20 | 2023 | 19,658 | 103 |  |
| Serramonte Center-Phases 1 & 2 | San Francisco, CA | 100% | Q4-20 | 2022 | 33,229 | 1,072 |  |
| Various Properties | Various | 100% | Various | Various | 8,916 | 243 |  |
| Total Redevelopments Completed |  |  |  |  | $73,718 | 1,925 |  |

(1) Estimated Stabilization Year represents the estimated first full calendar year that the project will reach our expected stabilized yield.

(2) Includes leasing costs and is net of tenant reimbursements.

(3) Estimated Net Development Costs and GLA are reported based on Regency's ownership interest in the real estate partnership at completion.

52

# Net cash used in financing activities:

Net cash flows used in financing activities changed during 2022, as follows:

| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |
| Net proceeds from common stock issuances | $61,284 | 82,510 | (21,226) |
| Repurchase of common shares in conjunction with equity award plans | (6,447) | (4,083) | (2,364) |
| Common shares repurchased through share repurchase program | (75,419) | - | (75,419) |
| Distributions to limited partners in consolidated partnerships, net | (7,245) | (4,345) | (2,900) |
| Dividend payments and operating partnership distributions | (430,143) | (404,900) | (25,243) |
| Repayments of unsecured credit facilities, net | - | (265,000) | 265,000 |
| Debt repayment, including early redemption costs | (17,964) | (53,269) | 35,305 |
| Payment of loan costs | (88) | (7,468) | 7,380 |
| Proceeds from sale of treasury stock, net | 64 | 96 | (32) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | $(475,958) | (656,459) | 180,501 |

Significant financing activities during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 included the following:

- • We received proceeds of \$61.3 million, net of issue costs, in April 2022 upon settling forward equity sales under our ATM program. During 2021, we received proceeds of \$82.5 million, net of issue costs, upon settling forward equity sales under our ATM program.
- • We repurchased for cash a portion of the common stock granted to employees for stock based compensation to satisfy employee tax withholding requirements, which totaled \$6.4 million and \$4.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
- • We paid \$75.4 million to repurchase 1,294,201 common shares through our Authorized Repurchase Program during 2022.
- • We paid \$7.2 million, net to limited partners, including \$15.0 million in distributions to limited partners for both operating cash flows as well as a partner buyout, partially offset by \$7.8 million of contributions from limited partners in new consolidated Investments in real estate partnerships during 2022. During 2021, we paid \$4.3 million in distributions to limited partners.
- • We paid \$25.2 million more in dividends primarily as a result of an increase in our dividend rate per share.
- • We had the following debt related activity during 2022:
  - ◦ We paid \$18.0 million for secured debt payments, including:
    - ▪ \$6.0 million to repay one mortgage, and
    - ▪ \$12.0 million in principal mortgage payments.
- • We had the following debt related activity during 2021:
  - ◦ We paid \$265 million to repay our outstanding term loan, and
  - ◦ We paid \$53.3 million for secured debt payments, including:
    - ▪ \$42.0 million to repay four mortgages; and
    - ▪ \$11.3 million in principal mortgage payments.
  - ◦ We paid \$7.5 million of loan costs in connection with the renewal of our Line.

53

## Contractual Obligations

We have contractual obligations at December 31, 2022, which are discussed in our notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and include:

- Mortgage loans, unsecured notes, and unsecured credit facilities as discussed in note 9, and related interest rate swaps as discussed in note 10;
- We have shopping centers that are subject to non-cancelable long-term ground leases where a third party owns and has leased the underlying land to us to construct and/or operate a shopping center. We also have non-cancelable operating leases pertaining to office space from which we conduct our business. These lease obligations are discussed in note 7;
- Our share of mortgage loans within our Investments in real estate partnerships, as discussed in note 4;
- Letters of credit of $9.4 million issued to cover our captive insurance program and performance obligations on certain development projects, the latter of which will be satisfied upon completion of the development projects;
- Obligations for retirement savings plans due to uncertainty around timing of participant withdrawals, which are solely within the control of the participant, and are further discussed in note 14; and
- We will also incur obligations related to construction or development contracts on projects in process; however, future amounts under these construction contracts are not due until future satisfactory performance under the contracts.

## Critical Accounting Estimates

Knowledge about our accounting policies is necessary for a complete understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires that we make certain estimates that impact the balance of assets and liabilities as of a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a financial reporting period. These accounting estimates are based upon, but not limited to, our judgments about historical and expected future results, current market conditions, and interpretation of industry accounting standards. While the following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of our accounting estimates, the estimates discussed below are believed to be critical because of their significance to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the possibility that future events may differ from those judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. We review these estimates on a periodic basis to ensure reasonableness; however, the amounts we may ultimately realize could differ from such estimates.

### Valuation of Real Estate Investments

In accordance with GAAP, we evaluate our real estate for impairment whenever there are events or changes in circumstances, including property operating performance, general market conditions or changes in expected hold periods, that indicate that the carrying value of our real estate properties (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) may not be recoverable. If such events or changes occur, we compare the current carrying value of the asset to the estimated undiscounted cash flows that are directly associated with the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. Our estimated cash flows are based on several key assumptions, including rental rates, expected leasing activity, costs of tenant improvements, leasing commissions, expected hold period, comparable sales information, and assumptions regarding the residual value upon disposition, including the exit capitalization rate. These key assumptions are subjective in nature and the resulting impairment, if any, could differ from the actual gain or loss recognized upon ultimate sale in an arm's length transaction. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of carrying value over the estimated fair value.

The estimated fair value of real estate assets is subjective and is estimated through comparable sales information and other market data if available, as well as the use of an income approach such as the direct capitalization method or the discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow method uses similar assumptions to the undiscounted cash flow method above, as well as a discount rate. Such cash flow projections and rates are subject to management judgment and changes in those assumptions could impact the estimation of fair value. In estimating the fair value of undeveloped land, we generally use market data and comparable sales information. Changes in events or changes in circumstances may alter the expected hold period of an asset or asset group, which may result in an impairment loss and such loss could be material to the Company's financial condition or operating performance.

### Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

54

## **Environmental Matters**

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations as they apply to our shopping centers, pertaining primarily to chemicals historically used by certain current and former dry cleaning and gas station tenants and the existence of asbestos in older shopping centers. We believe that the few tenants who currently operate dry cleaning plants or gas stations do so in accordance with current laws and regulations. Generally, we endeavor to require tenants to remove dry cleaning plants from our shopping centers or convert them to more environmentally friendly systems, in accordance with the terms of our leases. We carry an environmental insurance policy for certain third-party liabilities and remediation costs on shopping centers that currently have no known environmental contamination. We have also secured environmental insurance policies, where appropriate, on a relatively small number of specific properties with known contamination, in order to mitigate our environmental risk. We monitor the shopping centers containing environmental issues and in certain cases voluntarily remediate the sites. We also have legal obligations to remediate certain sites and we are in the process of doing so.

As of December 31, 2022, we had accrued liabilities of $12.1 million for our Pro-rata share of environmental remediation, including our Investments in real estate partnerships. We believe that the ultimate remediation of currently known environmental matters will not have a material effect on our financial position, cash flows, or results of operations. We can give no assurance that existing environmental studies on our shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental contamination; that our estimate of liabilities will not change as more information becomes available; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to us; that the current environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by unrelated third parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to us.

### **Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk**

We are exposed to two significant components of interest rate risk:

- We have a Line commitment, as further described in note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which has a variable interest rate that as of December 31, 2022, was based upon an annual rate of LIBOR plus 0.865%. On January 12, 2023, the Line was amended to convert the reference rate from LIBOR to the secured overnight financing rate ("SOFR") plus a 10 basis point market adjustment, with no changes in the applicable margin, which is dependent upon maintaining specific credit ratings. The current applicable margin is 0.865%. If our credit ratings are downgraded, the margin on the Line would increase, resulting in higher interest costs. The interest rate plus applicable margin based on our credit rating ranges from SOFR plus 0.690% to SOFR plus 1.540%.
- We are also exposed to changes in interest rates when we refinance our existing long-term fixed rate debt. The objective of our interest rate risk management program is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. To achieve these objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed interest rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps, or treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. Our interest rate swaps are structured solely for the purpose of interest rate protection.

We continuously monitor the capital markets and evaluate our ability to issue new debt, to repay maturing debt, or fund our commitments. We continue to believe, in light of our credit ratings, the available capacity under our unsecured credit facility, and the number of high quality, unencumbered properties that we own which could collateralize borrowings, we will be able to successfully issue new secured or unsecured debt to fund maturing debt obligations. It is uncertain the degree to which capital market volatility and rising interest rates will adversely impact the interest rates on any new debt that we may issue.

Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal cash flows, weighted average interest rates of remaining debt, and the fair value of total debt as of December 31, 2022. For variable rate mortgages and unsecured credit facilities for which we have interest rate swaps in place to fix the interest rate, they are included in the Fixed rate debt section below at their all-in fixed rate. The table is presented by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes. Although the average interest rate for variable rate debt is included in the table, those rates represent rates that existed as of December 31, 2022, and are subject to change on a monthly basis. In addition, the Company continually assesses the market risk for its floating rate debt and believes that a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $42,500 per year based on $4.3 million of floating rate mortgage debt outstanding at December 31, 2022. If the Company increases its line of credit balance in the future, additional decreases to future earnings and cash flows could occur.

55

Further, the table below incorporates only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2022, and does not consider exposures or positions that could arise after that date or obligations repaid before maturity. Since firm commitments are not presented, the table has limited predictive value. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time, and actual interest rates.

The table below presents the principal cash flow payments associated with our outstanding debt by year, weighted average interest rates on debt outstanding at each year-end, and fair value of total debt as of December 31, 2022.

| (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fixed rate debt (1) | $69,078 | 345,607 | 293,732 | 316,287 | 666,703 | 2,053,192 | 3,744,599 | 3,329,135 |
| Average interest rate for all fixed rate debt (2) | 3.82% | 3.82% | 3.83% | 3.84% | 3.84% | 3.89% |  |  |
| Variable rate SOFR debt (1) | $ - | - | 4,250 | - | - | - | 4,250 | 4,243 |
| Average interest rate for all variable rate debt (2) | 3.07% | 3.07% | 3.07% | -% | -% | -% |  |  |

$^{(1)}$ Reflects amount of debt maturities during each of the years presented as of December 31, 2022.

$^{(2)}$ Reflects weighted average interest rates of debt outstanding at the end of each year presented. For variable rate debt, the rate as of December 31, 2022, was used to determine the average interest rate for all future periods.

56

# **Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data**

# **Regency Centers Corporation and Regency Centers, L.P.**

# **Index to Financial Statements**

| Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 58 |
| --- | --- |
| Regency Centers Corporation: |  |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 | 64 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 65 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 66 |
| Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 67 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 69 |
| Regency Centers, L.P.: |  |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 | 71 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 72 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 73 |
| Consolidated Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 74 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 | 76 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 78 |
| Financial Statement Schedule |  |
| Schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2022 | 110 |

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required, materiality or because information required therein is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

57

# Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Regency Centers Corporation:

### *Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements*

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in *Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)* issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 17, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

### *Basis for Opinion*

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

### *Critical Audit Matter*

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

#### *Evaluation of expected hold periods for certain real estate assets*

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and presented on the consolidated balance sheet, real estate assets, less accumulated depreciation was $9.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. The Company evaluates real estate properties (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) for impairment whenever there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of the real estate properties may not be recoverable.

We identified the Company's assessment of events or changes in circumstances that could indicate a shortened expected hold period for certain real estate properties as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the events or changes in circumstances assessed by the Company that could indicate shortened expected hold periods for certain real estate properties. A shortening of the expected hold period could indicate a potential impairment.

58

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of a control related to the Company’s assessment of events or changes in circumstances that could indicate shortened expected hold periods for certain real estate properties. To evaluate relevant events or changes in circumstances indicating a potential shortening of the expected holding period, we:

- inquired of management and obtained written representations regarding potential property disposal plans, if any
- read minutes of the meetings of the Company’s board of directors
- inquired about the Company’s plans with those in the organization who are responsible for, and have authority over, potential disposition activities
- compared management’s assessment of properties with potential shortened expected hold periods to information obtained from those in the organization responsible for disposition activity
- inspected listings from external sources of real estate properties for sale by the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1993.

Jacksonville, Florida
February 17, 2023

59

# Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Regency Centers Corporation:

# Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Regency Centers Corporation and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 17, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

# Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

# Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
February 17, 2023

60

# Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Regency Centers Corporation

### *Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements*

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers, L.P. and subsidiaries (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in *Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)* issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 17, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

### *Basis for Opinion*

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

### *Critical Audit Matter*

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

#### *Evaluation of expected hold periods for certain real estate assets*

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and presented on the consolidated balance sheet, real estate assets, less accumulated depreciation was $9.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. The Partnership evaluates real estate properties (including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities) for impairment whenever there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of the real estate properties may not be recoverable.

We identified the Partnership's assessment of events or changes in circumstances that could indicate a shortened expected hold period for certain real estate properties as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the events or changes in circumstances assessed by the Partnership that could indicate shortened expected hold periods for certain real estate properties. A shortening of the expected hold period could indicate a potential impairment.

61

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of a control related to the Partnership’s assessment of events or changes in circumstances that could indicate shortened expected hold periods for certain real estate properties. To evaluate relevant events or changes in circumstances indicating a potential shortening of the expected hold period, we:

- inquired of management and obtained written representations regarding potential property disposal plans, if any
- read minutes of the meetings of the general partner’s board of directors
- inquired about the Partnership’s plans with those in the organization who are responsible for, and have authority over, potential disposition activities
- compared management’s assessment of properties with potential shortened expected hold periods to information obtained from those in the organization responsible for disposition activity
- inspected listings from external sources of real estate properties for sale by the Partnership.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Partnership's auditor since 1998.

Jacksonville, Florida
February 17, 2023

62

# Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Regency Centers Corporation

### *Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting*

We have audited Regency Centers, L.P. and subsidiaries' (the Partnership) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in *Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)* issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in *Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)* issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 17, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

### *Basis for Opinion*

The Partnership's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

### *Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting*

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida February 17, 2023

63

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**  
 **Consolidated Balance Sheets**  
 **December 31, 2022 and 2021**  
 **(in thousands, except share data)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assets |  |  |
| Net real estate investments: |  |  |
| Real estate assets, at cost (note 1) | $11,858,064 | 11,495,581 |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | 2,415,860 | 2,174,963 |
| Real estate assets, net | 9,442,204 | 9,320,618 |
| Investments in real estate partnerships (note 4) | 350,377 | 372,591 |
| Net real estate investments | 9,792,581 | 9,693,209 |
| Properties held for sale | - | 25,574 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, including $2,310 and $1,930 of restricted cash at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 1) | 68,776 | 95,027 |
| Tenant and other receivables (note 1) | 188,863 | 153,091 |
| Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $117,137 and $117,878 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 68,945 | 65,741 |
| Acquired lease intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $338,053 and $312,186 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 6) | 197,745 | 212,707 |
| Right of use assets, net | 275,513 | 280,783 |
| Other assets (note 5) | 267,797 | 266,431 |
| Total assets | $10,860,220 | 10,792,563 |
| Liabilities and Equity |  |  |
| Liabilities: |  |  |
| Notes payable (note 9) | $3,726,754 | 3,718,944 |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 317,259 | 322,271 |
| Acquired lease intangible liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $193,315 and $172,293 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 6) | 354,204 | 363,276 |
| Lease liabilities | 213,722 | 215,788 |
| Tenants’ security, escrow deposits and prepaid rent | 70,242 | 62,352 |
| Total liabilities | 4,682,181 | 4,682,631 |
| Commitments and contingencies (note 16) | - | - |
| Equity: |  |  |
| Stockholders’ equity (note 12): |  |  |
| Common stock $0.01 par value per share, 220,000,000 shares authorized; 171,124,593 and 171,213,008 shares issued at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 1,711 | 1,712 |
| Treasury stock at cost, 465,415 and 427,901 shares held at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | (24,461) | (22,758) |
| Additional paid-in capital | 7,877,152 | 7,883,458 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 7,560 | (10,227) |
| Distributions in excess of net income | (1,764,977) | (1,814,814) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 6,096,985 | 6,037,371 |
| Noncontrolling interests (note 12): |  |  |
| Exchangeable operating partnership units, aggregate redemption value of $46,340 and $56,844 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 34,489 | 35,447 |
| Limited partners’ interests in consolidated partnerships (note 1) | 46,565 | 37,114 |
| Total noncontrolling interests | 81,054 | 72,561 |
| Total equity | 6,178,039 | 6,109,932 |
| Total liabilities and equity | $10,860,220 | 10,792,563 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Operations**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands, except per share data)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revenues: |  |  |  |
| Lease income | $1,187,452 | 1,113,368 | 980,166 |
| Other property income | 10,719 | 12,456 | 9,508 |
| Management, transaction, and other fees | 25,851 | 40,337 | 26,501 |
| Total revenues | 1,224,022 | 1,166,161 | 1,016,175 |
| Operating expenses: |  |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization | 319,697 | 303,331 | 345,900 |
| Property operating expense | 196,148 | 184,553 | 170,073 |
| Real estate taxes | 149,795 | 142,129 | 143,004 |
| General and administrative | 79,903 | 78,218 | 75,001 |
| Other operating expenses | 6,166 | 5,751 | 12,642 |
| Total operating expenses | 751,709 | 713,982 | 746,620 |
| Other expense (income): |  |  |  |
| Interest expense, net | 146,186 | 145,170 | 156,678 |
| Goodwill impairment | - | - | 132,128 |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 84,389 | 18,536 |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (109,005) | (91,119) | (67,465) |
| Early extinguishment of debt | - | - | 21,837 |
| Net investment loss (income) | 6,921 | (5,463) | (5,307) |
| Total other expense (income) | 44,102 | 132,977 | 256,407 |
| Income from operations before equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships | 428,211 | 319,202 | 13,148 |
| Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships (note 4) | 59,824 | 47,086 | 34,169 |
| Net income | 488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |
| Exchangeable operating partnership units | (2,105) | (1,615) | (203) |
| Limited partners’ interests in consolidated partnerships | (3,065) | (3,262) | (2,225) |
| Income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (5,170) | (4,877) | (2,428) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $482,865 | 361,411 | 44,889 |
| Income per common share - basic (note 15) | $2.82 | 2.12 | 0.27 |
| Income per common share - diluted (note 15) | $2.81 | 2.12 | 0.26 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

65

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net income | $488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |
| Effective portion of change in fair value of derivative instruments: |  |  |  |
| Effective portion of change in fair value of derivative instruments | 20,061 | 5,391 | (19,187) |
| Reclassification adjustment of derivative instruments included in net income | 833 | 4,141 | 11,262 |
| Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities | (1,309) | (405) | 320 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 19,585 | 9,127 | (7,605) |
| Comprehensive income | 507,620 | 375,415 | 39,712 |
| Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5,170 | 4,877 | 2,428 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1,798 | 729 | (977) |
| Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 6,968 | 5,606 | 1,451 |
| Comprehensive income attributable to the Company | $500,652 | 369,809 | 38,261 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

66

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Equity**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands, except per share data)**

|  | Stockholders' Equity |  |  |  |  |  | Noncontrolling Interests |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional Paid In Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Distributions in Excess of Net Income | Total Stockholders' Equity | Exchangeable Operating Partnership Units | Limited Partners' Interest in Consolidated Partnerships | Total Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $1,676 | (23,199) | 7,654,930 | (11,997) | (1,408,062) | 6,213,348 | 36,100 | 40,513 | 76,613 | 6,289,961 |
| Net income | - | - | - | - | 44,889 | 44,889 | 203 | 2,225 | 2,428 | 47,317 |
| Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | - | - | (17,589) | - | (17,589) | (79) | (1,199) | (1,278) | (18,867) |
| Deferred compensation plan, net | - | - | - | 10,961 | - | 10,961 | 50 | 251 | 301 | 11,262 |
| Restricted stock issued, net of amortization | 2 | (1,237) | 1,237 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Common stock repurchased for taxes withheld for stock based compensation, net | - | - | 14,246 | - | - | 14,248 | - | - | - | 14,248 |
| Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | - | - | (5,059) | - | - | (5,059) | - | - | - | (5,059) |
| Common stock issued, net of issuance costs | 19 | - | 1,139 | - | - | 1,139 | - | - | - | 1,139 |
| Contributions from partners | - | - | 125,589 | - | - | 125,608 | - | - | - | 125,608 |
| Issuance of exchangeable operating partnership units | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,275 | 606 | 606 | 606 |
| Distributions to partners | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cash dividends declared: | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,275 | (4,888) | (4,888) | (4,888) |
| Common stock/unit ($2,380 per share) | - | - | - | - | (402,633) | (402,633) | (1,822) | - | (1,822) | (404,455) |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | $1,697 | (24,436) | 7,792,082 | (18,625) | (1,765,806) | 5,984,912 | 35,727 | 37,508 | 73,235 | 6,058,147 |
| Net income | - | - | - | - | 361,411 | 361,411 | 1,615 | 3,262 | 4,877 | 366,288 |
| Other comprehensive income: | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | - | - | - | 4,603 | - | 4,603 | 23 | 360 | 383 | 4,986 |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | - | - | 3,795 | - | 3,795 | 17 | 329 | 346 | 4,141 |
| Deferred compensation plan, net | - | 1,678 | (1,603) | - | - | 75 | - | - | - | 75 |
| Restricted stock issued, net of amortization | 2 | - | 12,650 | - | - | 12,652 | - | - | - | 12,652 |
| Common stock repurchased for taxes withheld for stock based compensation, net | - | - | (3,553) | - | - | (3,553) | - | - | - | (3,553) |
| Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | - | - | 1,286 | - | - | 1,286 | - | - | - | 1,286 |
| Common stock issued for partnership units exchanged | - | - | 99 | - | - | 99 | (99) | - | (99) | - |
| Common stock issued, net of issuance costs | 13 | - | 82,497 | - | - | 82,510 | - | - | - | 82,510 |
| Distributions to partners | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,345) | (4,345) | (4,345) |
| Cash dividends declared: | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Common stock/unit ($2,410 per share) | - | - | - | - | (410,419) | (410,419) | (1,836) | - | (1,836) | (412,255) |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $1,712 | (22,758) | 7,883,458 | (10,227) | (1,814,814) | 6,037,371 | 35,447 | 37,114 | 72,561 | 6,109,932 |

67

|  | Stockholders' Equity |  |  |  |  |  | Noncontrolling Interests |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional Paid In Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Distributions in Excess of Net Income | Total Stockholders' Equity | Exchangeable Operating Partnership Units | Limited Partners' Interest in Consolidated Partnerships | Total Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $1,712 | (22,758) | 7,883,458 | (10,227) | (1,814,814) | 6,037,371 | 35,447 | 37,114 | 72,561 | 6,109,932 |
| Net income | - | - | - | - | 482,865 | 482,865 | 2,105 | 3,065 | 5,170 | 488,035 |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | - | - | - | 17,008 | - | 17,008 | 80 | 1,664 | 1,744 | 18,752 |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | - | - | 779 | - | 779 | 5 | 49 | 54 | 833 |
| Deferred compensation plan, net | - | (1,703) | 1,702 | - | - | (1) | - | - | - | (1) |
| Restricted stock issued, net of amortization | 2 | - | 16,665 | - | - | 16,667 | - | - | - | 16,667 |
| Common stock repurchased for taxes withheld for stock based compensation, net | - | - | (5,858) | - | - | (5,858) | - | - | - | (5,858) |
| Common stock repurchased and retired | (13) | - | (75,406) | - | - | (75,419) | - | - | - | (75,419) |
| Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | - | - | 524 | - | - | 524 | - | - | - | 524 |
| Common stock issued for partnership units exchanged | - | - | 1,275 | - | - | 1,275 | (1,275) | - | (1,275) | - |
| Common stock issued, net of issuance costs | 10 | - | 61,274 | - | - | 61,284 | - | - | - | 61,284 |
| Reallocation of noncontrolling interest, net of transaction costs | - | - | (6,482) | - | - | (6,482) | - | 6,266 | 6,266 | (216) |
| Contributions from partners | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13,223 | 13,223 | 13,223 |
| Distributions to partners | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (14,816) | (14,816) | (14,816) |
| Cash dividends declared: | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Common stock/unit ($2,525 per share) | - | - | - | - | (433,028) | (433,028) | (1,823) | - | (1,823) | (434,901) |
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $1,711 | (24,461) | 7,877,152 | 7,560 | (1,764,977) | 6,096,985 | 34,489 | 46,565 | 81,054 | 6,178,039 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

68

# **REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |
| Net income | $488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization | 319,697 | 303,331 | 345,900 |
| Amortization of deferred loan costs and debt premiums | 5,799 | 6,003 | 9,023 |
| (Accretion) and amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net | (20,995) | (22,936) | (40,540) |
| Stock-based compensation, net of capitalization | 16,521 | 12,515 | 13,581 |
| Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships | (59,824) | (47,086) | (34,169) |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (109,005) | (91,119) | (67,465) |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 84,389 | 18,536 |
| Goodwill impairment | - | - | 132,128 |
| Early extinguishment of debt | - | - | 21,837 |
| Distribution of earnings from investments in real estate partnerships | 61,416 | 71,934 | 47,703 |
| Settlement of derivative instrument | - | (2,472) | - |
| Deferred compensation (revenue) expense | (6,128) | 4,572 | 4,668 |
| Realized and unrealized loss (gain) on investments | 7,040 | (5,348) | (5,519) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |
| Tenant and other receivables | (35,274) | (24,869) | 16,944 |
| Deferred leasing costs | (10,801) | (6,966) | (6,973) |
| Other assets | 1,292 | (1,226) | (1,200) |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | (9,088) | 6,677 | 997 |
| Tenants’ security, escrow deposits and prepaid rent | 7,130 | 5,701 | (3,650) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 655,815 | 659,388 | 499,118 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |
| Acquisition of operating real estate, net of cash acquired of $3,061 and $2,991 in 2022 and 2021, respectively | (169,639) | (392,051) | (16,767) |
| Real estate development and capital improvements | (195,418) | (177,631) | (180,804) |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate | 143,133 | 206,193 | 189,444 |
| Proceeds from property insurance casualty claims | - | - | 7,957 |
| Collection (issuance) of notes receivable, net | 1,823 | (20) | (1,340) |
| Investments in real estate partnerships | (36,266) | (23,476) | (51,440) |
| Return of capital from investments in real estate partnerships | 48,473 | 99,945 | 32,125 |
| Dividends on investment securities | 1,113 | 813 | 353 |
| Acquisition of investment securities | (21,112) | (23,971) | (25,155) |
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities | 21,785 | 23,846 | 19,986 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (206,108) | (286,352) | (25,641) |

69

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |
| Net proceeds from common stock issuance | 61,284 | 82,510 | 125,608 |
| Repurchase of common shares in conjunction with equity award plans | (6,447) | (4,083) | (5,512) |
| Proceeds from sale of treasury stock | 64 | 96 | 269 |
| Common shares repurchased through share repurchase program | (75,419) | - | - |
| Distributions to limited partners in consolidated partnerships, net | (7,245) | (4,345) | (2,770) |
| Distributions to exchangeable operating partnership unit holders | (1,867) | (1,815) | (1,366) |
| Dividends paid to common stockholders | (428,276) | (403,085) | (300,537) |
| Repayment of fixed rate unsecured notes | - | - | (300,000) |
| Proceeds from issuance of fixed rate unsecured notes, net | - | - | 598,830 |
| Proceeds from unsecured credit facilities | 95,000 | - | 610,000 |
| Repayments of proceeds from unsecured credit facilities, net | (95,000) | (265,000) | (830,000) |
| Repayment of notes payable | (6,745) | (42,014) | (67,189) |
| Scheduled principal payments | (11,219) | (11,255) | (11,104) |
| Payment of loan costs | (88) | (7,468) | (5,063) |
| Early redemption costs | - | - | (21,755) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (475,958) | (656,459) | (210,589) |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | (26,251) | (283,423) | 262,888 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of the year | 95,027 | 378,450 | 115,562 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of the year | $68,776 | 95,027 | 378,450 |
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |  |
| Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest of $4,166, $4,202, and $4,355 in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively) | $141,359 | 140,084 | 151,338 |
| Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds | $570 | 378 | 1,870 |
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: |  |  |  |
| Common stock and exchangeable operating partnership dividends declared but not paid | $111,709 | 107,480 | 101,412 |
| Exchangeable operating partnership units issued for acquisition of real estate | $ - | - | 1,275 |
| Previously held equity investments in real estate assets acquired | $17,179 | (4,609) | 5,986 |
| Mortgage loans assumed by Company with the acquisition of real estate | $22,779 | 111,104 | 16,359 |
| Mortgage loan assumed by purchaser with the sale of real estate | $ - | - | 8,250 |
| Common stock issued by Parent Company for partnership units exchanged | $1,275 | 99 | - |
| Real estate received in lieu of promote interest | $ - | 13,589 | - |
| Change in fair value of securities | $1,658 | 513 | 315 |
| Change in accrued capital expenditures | $4,888 | 10,188 | 12,166 |
| Common stock issued for dividend reinvestment plan | $524 | 1,286 | 1,139 |
| Stock-based compensation capitalized | $735 | 666 | 1,119 |
| Contributions from (distributions to) limited partners in consolidated partnerships, net | $5,436 | - | (1,512) |
| Reallocation of equity upon acquisition of a limited partner's interest in a consolidated partnership | $6,266 | - | - |
| Common stock issued for dividend reinvestment in trust | $1,126 | 1,084 | 819 |
| Contribution of stock awards into trust | $2,250 | 1,416 | 1,524 |
| Distribution of stock held in trust | $786 | 3,647 | 1,052 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

70

# **REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**  
 **Consolidated Balance Sheets**  
 **December 31, 2022 and 2021**  
 **(in thousands, except unit data)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assets |  |  |
| Net real estate investments: |  |  |
| Real estate assets, at cost (note 1) | $11,858,064 | 11,495,581 |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | 2,415,860 | 2,174,963 |
| Real estate assets, net | 9,442,204 | 9,320,618 |
| Investments in real estate partnerships (note 4) | 350,377 | 372,591 |
| Net real estate investments | 9,792,581 | 9,693,209 |
| Properties held for sale | - | 25,574 |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, including $2,310 and $1,930 of restricted cash at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 1) | 68,776 | 95,027 |
| Tenant and other receivables (note 1) | 188,863 | 153,091 |
| Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $117,137 and $117,878 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 68,945 | 65,741 |
| Acquired lease intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $338,053 and $312,186 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 6) | 197,745 | 212,707 |
| Right of use assets, net | 275,513 | 280,783 |
| Other assets (note 5) | 267,797 | 266,431 |
| Total assets | $10,860,220 | 10,792,563 |
| Liabilities and Capital |  |  |
| Liabilities: |  |  |
| Notes payable (note 9) | $3,726,754 | 3,718,944 |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 317,259 | 322,271 |
| Acquired lease intangible liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $193,315 and $172,293 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively (note 6) | 354,204 | 363,276 |
| Lease liabilities | 213,722 | 215,788 |
| Tenants’ security, escrow deposits and prepaid rent | 70,242 | 62,352 |
| Total liabilities | 4,682,181 | 4,682,631 |
| Commitments and contingencies (note 16) | - | - |
| Capital: |  |  |
| Partners’ capital (note 12): |  |  |
| General partner; 171,124,593 and 171,213,008 units outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 6,089,425 | 6,047,598 |
| Limited partners; 741,433 and 760,046 units outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021 | 34,489 | 35,447 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 7,560 | (10,227) |
| Total partners’ capital | 6,131,474 | 6,072,818 |
| Noncontrolling interests: Limited partners’ interests in consolidated partnerships | 46,565 | 37,114 |
| Total capital | 6,178,039 | 6,109,932 |
| Total liabilities and capital | $10,860,220 | 10,792,563 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

71

# **REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Operations**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands, except per unit data)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revenues: |  |  |  |
| Lease income | $1,187,452 | 1,113,368 | 980,166 |
| Other property income | 10,719 | 12,456 | 9,508 |
| Management, transaction, and other fees | 25,851 | 40,337 | 26,501 |
| Total revenues | 1,224,022 | 1,166,161 | 1,016,175 |
| Operating expenses: |  |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization | 319,697 | 303,331 | 345,900 |
| Property operating expense | 196,148 | 184,553 | 170,073 |
| Real estate taxes | 149,795 | 142,129 | 143,004 |
| General and administrative | 79,903 | 78,218 | 75,001 |
| Other operating expenses | 6,166 | 5,751 | 12,642 |
| Total operating expenses | 751,709 | 713,982 | 746,620 |
| Other expense (income): |  |  |  |
| Interest expense, net | 146,186 | 145,170 | 156,678 |
| Goodwill impairment | - | - | 132,128 |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 84,389 | 18,536 |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (109,005) | (91,119) | (67,465) |
| Early extinguishment of debt | - | - | 21,837 |
| Net investment loss (income) | 6,921 | (5,463) | (5,307) |
| Total other expense (income) | 44,102 | 132,977 | 256,407 |
| Income from operations before equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships | 428,211 | 319,202 | 13,148 |
| Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships (note 4) | 59,824 | 47,086 | 34,169 |
| Net income | 488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Limited partners’ interests in consolidated partnerships | (3,065) | (3,262) | (2,225) |
| Net income attributable to common unit holders | $484,970 | 363,026 | 45,092 |
| Income per common unit - basic (note 15): | $2.82 | 2.12 | 0.27 |
| Income per common unit - diluted (note 15): | $2.81 | 2.12 | 0.26 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

72

# **REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net income | $488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |
| Effective portion of change in fair value of derivative instruments: |  |  |  |
| Effective portion of change in fair value of derivative instruments | 20,061 | 5,391 | (19,187) |
| Reclassification adjustment of derivative instruments included in net income | 833 | 4,141 | 11,262 |
| Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities | (1,309) | (405) | 320 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 19,585 | 9,127 | (7,605) |
| Comprehensive income | 507,620 | 375,415 | 39,712 |
| Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3,065 | 3,262 | 2,225 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1,713 | 689 | (948) |
| Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 4,778 | 3,951 | 1,277 |
| Comprehensive income attributable to the Company | $502,842 | 371,464 | 38,435 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

73

# **REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Capital**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 (in thousands)

|  | General Partner Preferred and Common Units | Limited Partners | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total Partners' Capital | Noncontrolling Interests in Limited Partners' Interest in Consolidated Partnerships | Total Capital |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $6,225,345 | 36,100 | (11,997) | 6,249,448 | 40,513 | 6,289,961 |
| Net income | 44,889 | 203 | - | 45,092 | 2,225 | 47,317 |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | - | (79) | (17,589) | (17,668) | (1,199) | (18,867) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | 50 | 10,961 | 11,011 | 251 | 11,262 |
| Contributions from partners | - | - | - | - | 606 | 606 |
| Issuance of exchangeable operating partnership units | - | 1,275 | - | 1,275 | - | 1,275 |
| Distributions to partners | (402,633) | (1,822) | - | (404,455) | (4,888) | (409,343) |
| Restricted units issued as a result of restricted stock issued by Parent Company, net of amortization | 14,248 | - | - | 14,248 | - | 14,248 |
| Common units issued as a result of common stock issued by Parent Company, net of issuance costs | 125,608 | - | - | 125,608 | - | 125,608 |
| Common units repurchased as a result of common stock repurchased by Parent Company, net of issuances | (3,920) | - | - | (3,920) | - | (3,920) |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | $6,003,537 | 35,727 | (18,625) | 6,020,639 | 37,508 | 6,058,147 |
| Net income | 361,411 | 1,615 | - | 363,026 | 3,262 | 366,288 |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | - | 23 | 4,603 | 4,626 | 360 | 4,986 |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | 17 | 3,795 | 3,812 | 329 | 4,141 |
| Deferred compensation plan, net | 75 | - | - | 75 | - | 75 |
| Distributions to partners | (410,419) | (1,836) | - | (412,255) | (4,345) | (416,600) |
| Restricted units issued as a result of restricted stock issued by Parent Company, net of amortization | 12,652 | - | - | 12,652 | - | 12,652 |
| Common units issued as a result of common stock issued by Parent Company, net of issuance costs | 82,510 | - | - | 82,510 | - | 82,510 |
| Common units repurchased as a result of common stock repurchased by Parent Company, net of issuances | (2,267) | - | - | (2,267) | - | (2,267) |
| Common units exchanged for common stock of Parent Company | 99 | (99) | - | - | - | - |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $6,047,598 | 35,447 | (10,227) | 6,072,818 | 37,114 | 6,109,932 |

2

|  | General Partner Preferred and Common Units | Limited Partners | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total Partners' Capital | Noncontrolling Interest in Limited Partners' Interest in Consolidated Partnerships | Total Capital |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $6,047,598 | 35,447 | (10,227) | 6,072,818 | 37,114 | 6,109,932 |
| Net income | 482,865 | 2,105 | - | 484,970 | 3,065 | 488,035 |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | - | 80 | 17,008 | 17,088 | 1,664 | 18,752 |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | - | 5 | 779 | 784 | 49 | 833 |
| Deferred compensation plan, net | (1) | - | - | (1) | - | (1) |
| Contribution from partners | - | - | - | - | 13,223 | 13,223 |
| Distributions to partners | (433,028) | (1,873) | - | (434,901) | (14,816) | (449,717) |
| Reallocation of limited partners' interest, net of transaction costs | (6,482) | - | - | (6,482) | 6,266 | (216) |
| Restricted units issued as a result of restricted stock issued by Parent Company, net of amortization | 16,667 | - | - | 16,667 | - | 16,667 |
| Common units repurchased and retired as a result of common stock repurchased and retired by Parent Company | (75,419) | - | - | (75,419) | - | (75,419) |
| Common units issued as a result of common stock issued by Parent Company, net of issuance costs | 61,284 | - | - | 61,284 | - | 61,284 |
| Common units repurchased as a result of common stock repurchased by Parent Company, net of issuances | (5,334) | - | - | (5,334) | - | (5,334) |
| Common units exchanged for common stock of Parent Company | 1,275 | (1,275) | - | - | - | - |
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $6,089,425 | 34,489 | 7,560 | 6,131,474 | 46,565 | 6,178,039 |

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

25

# **REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.**  
 **Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows**  
 **For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020**  
 **(in thousands)**

|  | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |
| Net income | $488,035 | 366,288 | 47,317 |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
| Depreciation and amortization | 319,697 | 303,331 | 345,900 |
| Amortization of deferred loan costs and debt premiums | 5,799 | 6,003 | 9,023 |
| (Accretion) and amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net | (20,995) | (22,936) | (40,540) |
| Stock-based compensation, net of capitalization | 16,521 | 12,515 | 13,581 |
| Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships | (59,824) | (47,086) | (34,169) |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (109,005) | (91,119) | (67,465) |
| Provision for impairment of real estate | - | 84,389 | 18,536 |
| Goodwill impairment | - | - | 132,128 |
| Early extinguishment of debt | - | - | 21,837 |
| Distribution of earnings from investments in real estate partnerships | 61,416 | 71,934 | 47,703 |
| Settlement of derivative instrument | - | (2,472) | - |
| Deferred compensation (revenue) expense | (6,128) | 4,572 | 4,668 |
| Realized and unrealized loss (gain) on investments | 7,040 | (5,348) | (5,519) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |
| Tenant and other receivables | (35,274) | (24,869) | 16,944 |
| Deferred leasing costs | (10,801) | (6,966) | (6,973) |
| Other assets | 1,292 | (1,226) | (1,200) |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | (9,088) | 6,677 | 997 |
| Tenants’ security, escrow deposits and prepaid rent | 7,130 | 5,701 | (3,650) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 655,815 | 659,388 | 499,118 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |
| Acquisition of operating real estate, net of cash acquired of $3,061 and $2,991 in 2022 and 2021, respectively | (169,639) | (392,051) | (16,767) |
| Real estate development and capital improvements | (195,418) | (177,631) | (180,804) |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate | 143,133 | 206,193 | 189,444 |
| Proceeds from property insurance casualty claims | - | - | 7,957 |
| Collection (issuance) of notes receivable, net | 1,823 | (20) | (1,340) |
| Investments in real estate partnerships | (36,266) | (23,476) | (51,440) |
| Return of capital from investments in real estate partnerships | 48,473 | 99,945 | 32,125 |
| Dividends on investment securities | 1,113 | 813 | 353 |
| Acquisition of investment securities | (21,112) | (23,971) | (25,155) |
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities | 21,785 | 23,846 | 19,986 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (206,108) | (286,352) | (25,641) |

76

**Time limit hit – remaining pages or documents were skipped.**