qid stringlengths 8 8 | text stringlengths 10 2.14k | rule stringclasses 6
values | tree stringlengths 65 859 | copyid int64 0 2 | opinionid int64 0 0 | annotator_id stringclasses 18
values | isindirect stringclasses 2
values | _id stringlengths 36 36 | type stringclasses 6
values | is_animosity bool 2
classes | is_dehumanization bool 2
classes | is_derogation bool 2
classes | is_none bool 2
classes | is_support bool 2
classes | is_threatening bool 2
classes | derogation_output stringlengths 101 543 | animosity_output stringlengths 100 519 | dehumanization_output stringlengths 195 481 | threatening_output stringlengths 209 481 | support_output stringlengths 186 454 | pred_derogation bool 2
classes | target_group_derogation stringlengths 2 88 ⌀ | main_type_derogation stringclasses 11
values | justification_derogation stringlengths 92 300 ⌀ | confidence_derogation float64 0 1 | pred_animosity bool 2
classes | target_group_animosity stringlengths 3 79 ⌀ | main_type_animosity stringclasses 7
values | justification_animosity stringlengths 71 300 ⌀ | confidence_animosity float64 0 1 | pred_dehumanization bool 2
classes | target_group_dehumanization stringlengths 2 79 ⌀ | main_type_dehumanization stringclasses 9
values | justification_dehumanization stringlengths 89 300 | confidence_dehumanization float64 0.25 1 | pred_threatening bool 2
classes | target_group_threatening stringlengths 2 90 ⌀ | main_type_threatening stringclasses 8
values | justification_threatening stringlengths 107 300 | confidence_threatening float64 0.1 1 | pred_support bool 2
classes | target_group_support stringclasses 219
values | main_type_support stringclasses 6
values | justification_support stringlengths 87 300 | confidence_support float64 0 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
acl35759 | Recently scientists have started to understand how the Euro neandrathals moved outward to breed with primitive monkey like inferior primates, Blacks, Asians, etc. They found pre-Neandrathal Asian skeletons, Scientists also have learned that the white race is an isolated sequence within the genome, we whites are separat... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'to', 'breed', 'with', 'primitive', 'monkey', 'like', 'inferior', 'primates', ']', ']'] | 1 | 0 | {'$oid': '61ac6e27657898686a19d6ae'} | Yes | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624cdb'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks, Asians', 'main_type': 'inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares 'Blacks, Asians' to 'primitive monkey like inferior primates,' asserting their inferiority in comparison to 'whites.' This language dehumanize... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains elements of racial derogation and biological hierarchy narratives with explicit negative predicates, making it not strictly Animosity based on innuendo or implicit framing.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks, Asians', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text describes certain ethnic groups ('Blacks, Asians') in comparison to 'monkey like inferior primates,' which is a dehumanizing comparison to non-human entities, specifically primates or beasts. This language expl... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards certain racial groups but does not include any actionable verb or incitement to harm. It expresses a supremacist ideology rather than a direct threat.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'Neanderthal ancestry as racial superiority', 'main_type': 'hate_trope/symbol', 'justification': "The text employs a scientifically debunked notion of racial superiority, using Neanderthal ancestry as a trope to claim racial separation and hierarchy, labeling non-whites as 'inferior ... | true | Blacks, Asians | inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable | The text explicitly compares 'Blacks, Asians' to 'primitive monkey like inferior primates,' asserting their inferiority in comparison to 'whites.' This language dehumanizes these groups by comparing them to primates and clearly indicates a hierarchy, fitting the definition of derogation. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The text contains elements of racial derogation and biological hierarchy narratives with explicit negative predicates, making it not strictly Animosity based on innuendo or implicit framing. | 0.9 | true | Blacks, Asians | beasts | The text describes certain ethnic groups ('Blacks, Asians') in comparison to 'monkey like inferior primates,' which is a dehumanizing comparison to non-human entities, specifically primates or beasts. This language explicitly suggests that these groups are biologically inferior and subhuman, meeting | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards certain racial groups but does not include any actionable verb or incitement to harm. It expresses a supremacist ideology rather than a direct threat. | 0.95 | true | Neanderthal ancestry as racial superiority | hate_trope/symbol | The text employs a scientifically debunked notion of racial superiority, using Neanderthal ancestry as a trope to claim racial separation and hierarchy, labeling non-whites as 'inferior primates'. This constitutes explicit support for a hate trope promoting racial supremacy. | 1 |
acl34825 | When geographically separate populations within a species exhibit recognizable phenotypic differences, biologists may identify these as separate subspecies; a subspecies is a recognized local variant of a species. Come on guys this is basic science, blacks are not the same species. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'are', 'not', 'the', 'same', 'species', ']', ']'] | 1 | 0 | {'$oid': '61ac6e27657898686a19d6ae'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624cdf'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'blacks', 'main_type': 'inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable', 'justification': "The text explicitly claims that 'blacks are not the same species,' which implies a notion of biological inferiority and separation from other humans. This falls under the category... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'blacks', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': "The statement makes a pseudo-factual claim suggesting that black people are a different species, which implicitly dehumanizes and undermines their humanity. It frames this harmful st... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'blacks', 'main_type': 'other', 'justification': "The text implies that 'blacks' are not the same species as other humans, suggesting they are a different kind of biological entity. This comparison implies a fundamental biological separation between racial groups, stripping the... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text makes a dehumanizing and scientifically inaccurate statement about a racial group but does not express intent or incitement to harm. It lacks an actionable verb or intent directed towards a group, such as a call to violence or... | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'racist trope', 'main_type': 'hate_trope/symbol', 'justification': 'The text explicitly promotes a racist trope by implying that Black people are a different species, which is a dehumanizing and unfounded pseudoscientific claim often used to justify racial hierarchy and discriminatio... | true | blacks | inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable | The text explicitly claims that 'blacks are not the same species,' which implies a notion of biological inferiority and separation from other humans. This falls under the category of derogation as it portrays a false and demeaning statement about a racial group. | 0.95 | true | blacks | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The statement makes a pseudo-factual claim suggesting that black people are a different species, which implicitly dehumanizes and undermines their humanity. It frames this harmful stereotype as a 'basic science' fact without using slurs, fitting the animosity criteria. | 0.95 | true | blacks | other | The text implies that 'blacks' are not the same species as other humans, suggesting they are a different kind of biological entity. This comparison implies a fundamental biological separation between racial groups, stripping the target of equal human status. Such a claim fits the definition of Dehum | 1 | false | Blacks | null | The text makes a dehumanizing and scientifically inaccurate statement about a racial group but does not express intent or incitement to harm. It lacks an actionable verb or intent directed towards a group, such as a call to violence or incitement to harm, which are required for the text to be deemed | 0.7 | true | racist trope | hate_trope/symbol | The text explicitly promotes a racist trope by implying that Black people are a different species, which is a dehumanizing and unfounded pseudoscientific claim often used to justify racial hierarchy and discrimination. | 1 |
acl14877 | trrassssshhh = re eeee ee ef uuuuuge eeee e | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 're', 'eeee', 'ee', 'ef', 'uuuuuge', 'eeee', 'e', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 're', 'eeee', 'ee', 'ef', 'uuuuuge', 'eeee', 'e', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'trrassssshhh', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61ae75a2657898686a19d94c'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624d1c'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text appears to be a distorted or nonsensical string without a clear target or explicit derogatory content. It lacks a reference to a specific group or any explicit negativity that fits the definition of Derogation.', 'confidence': 0.3} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any discernible content that targets a group or expresses hostility towards any group. It appears to be nonsensical or spam-like content without a clear target.', 'confidence': 0.8} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not explicitly compare a group to a non-human entity with malicious intent. The wording appears to be nonsensical or stylized rather than providing clear evidence of dehumanization.', 'confidence': 0.7} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text appears to be a distorted or stretched form of an unspecified word, potentially a derogatory term, but it lacks context, clear language, or explicit intent to cause harm to a group. There is no identifiable action, intent, or targ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not clearly identify or support any hateful entity, action, or symbol. It appears to be gibberish or distorted text without clear meaning.', 'confidence': 0.8} | false | null | null | The text appears to be a distorted or nonsensical string without a clear target or explicit derogatory content. It lacks a reference to a specific group or any explicit negativity that fits the definition of Derogation. | 0.3 | false | null | null | The text does not contain any discernible content that targets a group or expresses hostility towards any group. It appears to be nonsensical or spam-like content without a clear target. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not explicitly compare a group to a non-human entity with malicious intent. The wording appears to be nonsensical or stylized rather than providing clear evidence of dehumanization. | 0.7 | false | null | null | The text appears to be a distorted or stretched form of an unspecified word, potentially a derogatory term, but it lacks context, clear language, or explicit intent to cause harm to a group. There is no identifiable action, intent, or target described. | 0.6 | false | null | null | The text does not clearly identify or support any hateful entity, action, or symbol. It appears to be gibberish or distorted text without clear meaning. | 0.8 |
acl22669 | I believe it. blacks in their own enviroment must be even worse. I hear about the trouble they cause to white south africans, and it's unfortunate. I was unfortunate enough to meet a few in my life.. They are stupid... And lazy... So I cant imagine what it must have been like having one of these nasty chimps as slaves... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'feral', 'negro', 'at', 'my', 'Wifes', 'work', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'negro', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'he', 'boon', ']', ']'] | 2 | 0 | {'$oid': '61ae75a2657898686a19d94c'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624d25'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text contains explicit derogatory language and slurs, such as 'nasty chimps', 'feral negro', and 'he-boon', directed towards Black people. This language is demea... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains explicit derogation using racial slurs and insults directed at Black people, with negative adjectives and dehumanizing metaphors (e.g., 'nasty chimps', 'feral negro'). The presence of overt slurs and direct negative predica... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses dehumanizing language by referring to Black people as 'chimps', 'dogs', and 'he-boons', all of which are non-human entities. This maliciously equates the target group to animals, fitting the crite... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards a racial group, but it does not contain an explicit intent or incitement to harm. There is no actionable verb indicating a threat of harm towards the group, making it not f... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text demonstrates extreme derogatory and racist language towards black people, but it does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a recognized hateful entity like a hate organization, known individual, or symbol. The focus is on indi... | true | Black people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text contains explicit derogatory language and slurs, such as 'nasty chimps', 'feral negro', and 'he-boon', directed towards Black people. This language is demeaning, dehumanizing, and portrays the group negatively. The text clearly falls under the category of Derogation due to the use of racial | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit derogation using racial slurs and insults directed at Black people, with negative adjectives and dehumanizing metaphors (e.g., 'nasty chimps', 'feral negro'). The presence of overt slurs and direct negative predicates categorizes this as explicit Derogation rather than An | 0 | true | Black people | beasts | The text explicitly uses dehumanizing language by referring to Black people as 'chimps', 'dogs', and 'he-boons', all of which are non-human entities. This maliciously equates the target group to animals, fitting the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | Blacks | null | The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards a racial group, but it does not contain an explicit intent or incitement to harm. There is no actionable verb indicating a threat of harm towards the group, making it not fit the criteria for a threatening judgment under the given schema | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text demonstrates extreme derogatory and racist language towards black people, but it does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a recognized hateful entity like a hate organization, known individual, or symbol. The focus is on individual animosity and derogation rather than support for a | 0.95 |
acl14512 | when will camels-crunchers become fucking extinct- useless animals | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'camels', 'crunchers', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'camels', 'crunchers', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'become', 'fucking', 'extinct', 'useless', 'animals', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61ae75a2657898686a19d94c'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624d39'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'people of Middle Eastern descent', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'camels-crunchers' as a derogatory slur targeting people of Middle Eastern descent and refers to them as 'useless animals'... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains explicit derogation due to the use of the slur 'camels-crunchers' and the negative adjective 'useless animals', which do not fit the criteria of Animosity.", 'confidence': 0.8} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'camels-crunchers', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares a group referred to as 'camels-crunchers' to 'useless animals' and wishes for their extinction, equating them to non-human entities with negative connotations. This meets the criteria for ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Camels', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory language and a wish for extinction towards camels, but does not include an actionable threat or incitement to cause harm. This does not meet the strict criteria for being classified as threatening because ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not reference any known hate group, event, act, or figure. It expresses hostility towards animals (camels), which is outside the scope of supporting hateful entities as defined.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | people of Middle Eastern descent | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text uses the term 'camels-crunchers' as a derogatory slur targeting people of Middle Eastern descent and refers to them as 'useless animals', aligning with explicit negativity and insult fitting the definition of derogation. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit derogation due to the use of the slur 'camels-crunchers' and the negative adjective 'useless animals', which do not fit the criteria of Animosity. | 0.8 | true | camels-crunchers | beasts | The text explicitly compares a group referred to as 'camels-crunchers' to 'useless animals' and wishes for their extinction, equating them to non-human entities with negative connotations. This meets the criteria for dehumanization as it strips the target group of human status. | 1 | false | Camels | null | The text expresses derogatory language and a wish for extinction towards camels, but does not include an actionable threat or incitement to cause harm. This does not meet the strict criteria for being classified as threatening because it lacks a call to action or expression of intent to enact harm. | 0.7 | false | null | null | The text does not reference any known hate group, event, act, or figure. It expresses hostility towards animals (camels), which is outside the scope of supporting hateful entities as defined. | 0.9 |
acl11453 | Every black dude I've ever met was a piece of shit | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'was', 'a', 'piece', 'of', 'shit', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b7961dc03b7522fb709d14'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624d41'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'black dudes', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'black dudes' using the derogatory phrase 'piece of shit', which is a direct insult. It reflects a stereotype, suggesting all individuals from... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement contains a direct insult ('piece of shit') directed at a group ('black dude'). This is explicit derogation rather than animosity as it uses an overtly insulting term.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'black men', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses a derogatory term 'piece of shit' to describe black men but does not make an explicit non-human comparison or label them with non-human features. This fits the criteria for derogation rather than dehumanization, as ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'black men', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a derogatory opinion about a group (black men) but does not include an incitement or intent to harm them. It is an example of derogation but lacks any threat of action.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a derogatory sentiment towards a racial group, but does not explicitly support, glorify, or endorse a universally recognized hate entity or ideology.', 'confidence': 1.0} | true | black dudes | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly targets 'black dudes' using the derogatory phrase 'piece of shit', which is a direct insult. It reflects a stereotype, suggesting all individuals from the group possess negative characteristics, fulfilling the criteria for derogation. | 0.98 | false | null | null | The statement contains a direct insult ('piece of shit') directed at a group ('black dude'). This is explicit derogation rather than animosity as it uses an overtly insulting term. | 0.9 | false | black men | null | The text uses a derogatory term 'piece of shit' to describe black men but does not make an explicit non-human comparison or label them with non-human features. This fits the criteria for derogation rather than dehumanization, as there is no language equating the target group to non-human entities. | 0.9 | false | black men | null | The statement expresses a derogatory opinion about a group (black men) but does not include an incitement or intent to harm them. It is an example of derogation but lacks any threat of action. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a derogatory sentiment towards a racial group, but does not explicitly support, glorify, or endorse a universally recognized hate entity or ideology. | 1 |
acl37937 | In the extremely near future this planet is going to become a deadly place for these bottom feeding parasites. We will get rid of the israeli menace | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'the', 'israeli', 'menace', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'israeli', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'these', 'bottom', 'feeding', 'parasites', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61a12b5b105e19bf76409a11'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624dc9'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Israelis', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets Israelis with derogatory terms such as 'bottom feeding parasites' and 'menace', which are explicit slurs and insults without any reclamation ... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'Israeli people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses dehumanizing language 'bottom feeding parasites' and 'menace,' which goes beyond subtle hostility into explicit derogation. It implies severe hostility and intent to harm rather than suggesting subtle animosity by f... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Israeli', 'main_type': 'vermin', 'justification': "The text refers to Israelis as 'bottom feeding parasites,' explicitly comparing them to non-human pests. This dehumanizes the group by stripping them of human status and suggesting they are biologically inferior organisms, fit... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Israelis', 'main_type': 'physical_violence', 'justification': "The text uses threatening language suggesting future physical harm to a group identified as 'bottom feeding parasites,' specifically calling them the 'Israeli menace.' This statement suggests an intent to 'get rid of'... | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'Israeli', 'main_type': 'hate_individual', 'justification': "The text refers to 'the Israeli menace' and expresses the intention to 'get rid' of them, indicating explicit hostility and support for a harmful action against a specific group, which aligns with hate toward individuals or... | true | Israelis | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly targets Israelis with derogatory terms such as 'bottom feeding parasites' and 'menace', which are explicit slurs and insults without any reclamation or counter-speech context. This fulfills the criteria for Derogation as it vilifies the group in strong negative terms. | 0.98 | false | Israeli people | null | The text uses dehumanizing language 'bottom feeding parasites' and 'menace,' which goes beyond subtle hostility into explicit derogation. It implies severe hostility and intent to harm rather than suggesting subtle animosity by framing. | 1 | true | Israeli | vermin | The text refers to Israelis as 'bottom feeding parasites,' explicitly comparing them to non-human pests. This dehumanizes the group by stripping them of human status and suggesting they are biologically inferior organisms, fitting the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | true | Israelis | physical_violence | The text uses threatening language suggesting future physical harm to a group identified as 'bottom feeding parasites,' specifically calling them the 'Israeli menace.' This statement suggests an intent to 'get rid of' them, implying potential violence and severe harm. | 0.9 | true | Israeli | hate_individual | The text refers to 'the Israeli menace' and expresses the intention to 'get rid' of them, indicating explicit hostility and support for a harmful action against a specific group, which aligns with hate toward individuals or groups. | 0.9 |
acl34861 | i like n1gs because they look like monke | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'n1gs', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'n1gs', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'they', 'look', 'like', 'monke', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61a12b5b105e19bf76409a11'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ddc'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': 'The text includes a racial slur and compares Black people to animals, which is a hateful and derogatory statement.', 'confidence': 0.98} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text includes a direct slur, which calls for classification as explicit derogation rather than animosity. This falls under overtly racist language rather than subtle or implicit hostility.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'n1gs', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'monke' to compare the target group to non-human animals with a racist slur. This fits the definition of dehumanization as it equates the target group with animals (specifically, primates).", 'confidence': ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text includes derogatory and dehumanizing language targeting Black people by comparing them to monkeys. However, it does not contain an explicit intent or incitement to harm, which is necessary to classify it as threatening u... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement uses a racial slur and derogatory comparison but does not glorify or support an unambiguously hateful entity. It does not meet the criteria for support of hate.', 'confidence': 1.0} | true | Black people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text includes a racial slur and compares Black people to animals, which is a hateful and derogatory statement. | 0.98 | false | null | null | The text includes a direct slur, which calls for classification as explicit derogation rather than animosity. This falls under overtly racist language rather than subtle or implicit hostility. | 1 | true | n1gs | beasts | The text uses the term 'monke' to compare the target group to non-human animals with a racist slur. This fits the definition of dehumanization as it equates the target group with animals (specifically, primates). | 1 | false | Black people | null | The text includes derogatory and dehumanizing language targeting Black people by comparing them to monkeys. However, it does not contain an explicit intent or incitement to harm, which is necessary to classify it as threatening under this taxonomy. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The statement uses a racial slur and derogatory comparison but does not glorify or support an unambiguously hateful entity. It does not meet the criteria for support of hate. | 1 |
acl35845 | As the issue of climate change worsens, people are going to be fleeing a lot of the third world en masse. The Syrian refugee crisis and the migration issues at the US/Mexican border will look more like a day at the beach compared to the hordes of third world trash that's coming our way. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'the', 'hordes', 'of', 'third', 'world', 'trash', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'migration', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'trash', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e26'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'third world people', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses the derogatory term 'third world trash' to demean people from third world countries. This constitutes a direct insult aimed at this group'... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'people from the third world', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language ('hordes of third world trash') to imply a negative view about people from the third world, casting them in a dehumanizing l... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'People from the Third World', 'main_type': 'waste/trash', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'third world trash' to describe people fleeing due to climate change. This specific metaphor equates the human target group to waste material, which is a form of dehumanization a... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'people from the third world', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language towards a broad group of people by referring to them as 'third world trash,' which is dehumanizing and hateful. However, it does not explicitly incite or threaten harm or violence ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language towards refugees and migrants but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support hateful entities or events. It does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate organization, event, act, individual, or ... | true | third world people | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly uses the derogatory term 'third world trash' to demean people from third world countries. This constitutes a direct insult aimed at this group's character, categorizing it as Derogation. | 0.95 | true | people from the third world | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text uses derogatory language ('hordes of third world trash') to imply a negative view about people from the third world, casting them in a dehumanizing light. It uses innuendo and framing to convey hostility without direct insults, suggesting they are undesirable burdens. | 1 | true | People from the Third World | waste/trash | The text uses the term 'third world trash' to describe people fleeing due to climate change. This specific metaphor equates the human target group to waste material, which is a form of dehumanization as it strips the target of human status and treats them as undesirable refuse. | 1 | false | people from the third world | null | The text uses derogatory language towards a broad group of people by referring to them as 'third world trash,' which is dehumanizing and hateful. However, it does not explicitly incite or threaten harm or violence against this group. It lacks a clear actionable verb or intent to inflict harm, which, | 0.75 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language towards refugees and migrants but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support hateful entities or events. It does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate organization, event, act, individual, or trope symbol. | 0.85 |
acl22098 | Well, I'll put it this way. The average IQ of an American black is 85. The average IQ of a chimpanzee is 85. Do the maths. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'an', 'American', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'a', 'chimpanzee', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e40'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'American black', 'main_type': 'inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares 'American blacks' to chimpanzees, suggesting a derogatory view of their intelligence. This comparison implies inferiority and is a form of deh... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'American black individuals', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': 'The text implies a negative view towards American black individuals by equating their average IQ to that of a chimpanzee, which is demeaning and derogatory. Despi... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'American black', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares the intelligence of 'American black' individuals to chimpanzees, which are non-human animals. This malicious comparison equates a human group to animals, explicitly dehumanizing them by impl... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Black Americans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text makes a derogatory and dehumanizing comparison between Black Americans and chimpanzees, which is offensive and racist but does not contain a threat of harm or incitement to violence against a group. It therefore does ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text presents derogatory, racist statements equating Black people with animals, but it does not glorify or support an unambiguously hateful entity. It lacks explicit support for hate organizations, events, or figures.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | American black | inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable | The text explicitly compares 'American blacks' to chimpanzees, suggesting a derogatory view of their intelligence. This comparison implies inferiority and is a form of dehumanization not typically limited to the Derogation category, but here it focuses on claimed lack of capability rather than non-h | 0.99 | true | American black individuals | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The text implies a negative view towards American black individuals by equating their average IQ to that of a chimpanzee, which is demeaning and derogatory. Despite using a pseudo-factual approach, it expresses hostility and dehumanizes the group, fulfilling the criteria for Animosity. | 0.95 | true | American black | beasts | The text explicitly compares the intelligence of 'American black' individuals to chimpanzees, which are non-human animals. This malicious comparison equates a human group to animals, explicitly dehumanizing them by implying biological inferiority and lack of full human status. | 1 | false | Black Americans | null | The text makes a derogatory and dehumanizing comparison between Black Americans and chimpanzees, which is offensive and racist but does not contain a threat of harm or incitement to violence against a group. It therefore does not meet the criteria for 'threatening' as there is no direct incitement, | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text presents derogatory, racist statements equating Black people with animals, but it does not glorify or support an unambiguously hateful entity. It lacks explicit support for hate organizations, events, or figures. | 0.9 |
acl35453 | Julius Caesar granted citizenship it in order to get votes. It's not a deep strategy or a "conspiracy." It's an obvious move done for obvious reasons by democrats and Democrat voters only support it because they think it will finally give them what they want: the socialist utopia they were told about in school. Racism ... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'those', 'clueless', 'chimps', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'chimps', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'clueless', 'chimps', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e44'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Democrat voters', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text uses a derogatory slur 'chimps' when referring to a group of voters, which is a manifestly negative term aimed at demeaning the group. This constitutes a... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Democrats and Democrat voters', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text insinuates that Democrats and their voters manipulate issues for a 'power grab' and derogatorily refers to some voters as 'clueless chimps,' implyi... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Democrat voters', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'clueless chimps' to describe 'Democrat voters.' This explicitly equates the target group to non-human primates, which are animals, thus fitting the criteria for dehumanization as it strips them ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Democrat voters', 'main_type': 'other', 'justification': "The text contains derogatory remarks and dehumanizing language towards Democrat voters, referring to them as 'clueless chimps' and accusing them of supporting a 'power grab'. However, it does not express a direct intent or ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory language specifically targeted towards Democrats and certain voters, referring to them in a racist and derogatory manner. However, it does not explicitly glorify or support any known hateful entity/events. The se... | true | Democrat voters | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text uses a derogatory slur 'chimps' when referring to a group of voters, which is a manifestly negative term aimed at demeaning the group. This constitutes an explicit act of derogation according to the definition. | 0.95 | true | Democrats and Democrat voters | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text insinuates that Democrats and their voters manipulate issues for a 'power grab' and derogatorily refers to some voters as 'clueless chimps,' implying a negative view and animalistic comparison without using explicit slurs. This reflects hostility mainly through derogatory framing and innu0 | 0.9 | true | Democrat voters | beasts | The text uses the term 'clueless chimps' to describe 'Democrat voters.' This explicitly equates the target group to non-human primates, which are animals, thus fitting the criteria for dehumanization as it strips them of human status. | 1 | false | Democrat voters | other | The text contains derogatory remarks and dehumanizing language towards Democrat voters, referring to them as 'clueless chimps' and accusing them of supporting a 'power grab'. However, it does not express a direct intent or incitement to inflict harm on this group, thus it does not meet the criteria, | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory language specifically targeted towards Democrats and certain voters, referring to them in a racist and derogatory manner. However, it does not explicitly glorify or support any known hateful entity/events. The sentiment is more political derogation rather than support. | 0.9 |
acl36629 | The Chinese shit living here is a far greater threat to western democracy right now than any Islamic militant. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'The', 'Chinese', 'shit', 'living', 'here', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Chinese', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'The', 'Chinese', 'shit', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e54'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Chinese people', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'Chinese shit', which is a derogatory term aimed at Chinese people, claiming they are a greater threat to western democracy than Islamic mi... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses explicit derogatory language ('Chinese shit') to describe a group in a clearly discriminatory manner, which qualifies it for explicit derogation, not animosity.", 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Chinese', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "While the text uses derogatory language against 'Chinese' individuals and portrays them as a 'threat,' it does not explicitly equate them to a non-human entity or make a dehumanizing comparison. The term used is a derogatory slang,... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Chinese', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language against a group ('Chinese') but does not include an actionable verb or incitement to harm. It expresses a negative opinion rather than a call to action or support for harm.", 'confidence': 0.95} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language directed at a group based on ethnicity, but it does not glorify or support any specific hateful entity, act, or deny an atrocity. It does not meet the criteria for support of a hate entity or event.', 'co... | true | Chinese people | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly targets 'Chinese shit', which is a derogatory term aimed at Chinese people, claiming they are a greater threat to western democracy than Islamic militants. The use of a racial slur coupled with the threat characterization constitutes derogation. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The text uses explicit derogatory language ('Chinese shit') to describe a group in a clearly discriminatory manner, which qualifies it for explicit derogation, not animosity. | 1 | false | Chinese | null | While the text uses derogatory language against 'Chinese' individuals and portrays them as a 'threat,' it does not explicitly equate them to a non-human entity or make a dehumanizing comparison. The term used is a derogatory slang, but it lacks a non-human metaphor. | 0.9 | false | Chinese | null | The text uses derogatory language against a group ('Chinese') but does not include an actionable verb or incitement to harm. It expresses a negative opinion rather than a call to action or support for harm. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language directed at a group based on ethnicity, but it does not glorify or support any specific hateful entity, act, or deny an atrocity. It does not meet the criteria for support of a hate entity or event. | 0.85 |
acl30906 | My agenda is buying a new car and driving everywhere I can to see the world with my trans boyfriend apart from muslim countries, they are full of terrorists. And we just bought one yesterday so be careful! Agenda in motion! | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'terrorists', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'muslim', 'countries', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'full', 'of', 'terrorists', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e59'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': 'associating_entire_group_with_negative_behaviors_criminals_or_terrorists', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets Muslims, associating them with terrorism by stating they are 'full of terrorists'. This is a clear instance of derogation by attributing... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': 'The text uses a prejudicial stereotype by equating Muslim countries with terrorism, implying negative attributes about the group collectively without using explicit slurs.', 'confid... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text derogatorily labels Muslims as 'terrorists' but does not equate them with non-human entities. The term used is an offensive stereotype rather than a dehumanizing metaphor or comparison to pests or animals.", 'confidence': ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language towards Muslims, but it does not contain a call to action or express an intent to inflict harm. The statement expresses a personal travel preference based on a stereotype without threatening actio... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal agenda and includes derogatory language about Muslim countries, but it does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | Muslims | associating_entire_group_with_negative_behaviors_criminals_or_terrorists | The text explicitly targets Muslims, associating them with terrorism by stating they are 'full of terrorists'. This is a clear instance of derogation by attributing negative behaviors to an entire group. | 0.96 | true | Muslims | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The text uses a prejudicial stereotype by equating Muslim countries with terrorism, implying negative attributes about the group collectively without using explicit slurs. | 0.9 | false | Muslims | null | The text derogatorily labels Muslims as 'terrorists' but does not equate them with non-human entities. The term used is an offensive stereotype rather than a dehumanizing metaphor or comparison to pests or animals. | 0.9 | false | Muslims | null | The text contains derogatory language towards Muslims, but it does not contain a call to action or express an intent to inflict harm. The statement expresses a personal travel preference based on a stereotype without threatening action. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal agenda and includes derogatory language about Muslim countries, but it does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity. | 0.9 |
acl17953 | what sick mind thought those refugee worms are a good idea | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'those', 'refugee', 'worms', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'refugee', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'worms', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e66'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'refugees', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'refugees' using the dehumanizing term 'worms,' which is a slur that diminishes their humanity. The phrase 'what sick mind thought' adds an e... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'refugee', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The phrase 'refugee worms' dehumanizes the target group, implying disdain and inferiority without using explicit slurs or threats. It fits the criteria for animosity through the ... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'refugees', 'main_type': 'insects/swarm', 'justification': "The text uses the derogatory term 'worms' to refer to 'refugees,' comparing the target group to non-human entities associated with filth and degradation. This explicitly strips the target group of their human status an... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'refugees', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language towards refugees, referring to them as 'worms', but does not contain an actionable threat or incitement to harm. It lacks a clear intent to inflict harm or a call to action that fits the criteria... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language towards refugees, describing them as 'worms', but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support any hateful entity. It represents hostility but not explicit support for a recognized hate group, event, or s... | true | refugees | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly targets 'refugees' using the dehumanizing term 'worms,' which is a slur that diminishes their humanity. The phrase 'what sick mind thought' adds an element of disdain and negative intention towards those advocating for refugees, solidifying it as derogation. | 0.97 | true | refugee | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The phrase 'refugee worms' dehumanizes the target group, implying disdain and inferiority without using explicit slurs or threats. It fits the criteria for animosity through the use of derogatory metaphorical language ('worms'), reflecting hostility and negative perception towards refugees. | 0.9 | true | refugees | insects/swarm | The text uses the derogatory term 'worms' to refer to 'refugees,' comparing the target group to non-human entities associated with filth and degradation. This explicitly strips the target group of their human status and treats them as inferior, fitting the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | refugees | null | The text contains derogatory language towards refugees, referring to them as 'worms', but does not contain an actionable threat or incitement to harm. It lacks a clear intent to inflict harm or a call to action that fits the criteria for a threatening judgment. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language towards refugees, describing them as 'worms', but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support any hateful entity. It represents hostility but not explicit support for a recognized hate group, event, or symbol. | 0.9 |
acl31206 | The African continent is overall totally parasitic in its nature and will kill the host. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'The', 'African', 'continent', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'African', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'is', 'overall', 'totally', 'parasitic', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e7c'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'The African continent', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text explicitly describes 'The African continent' as 'totally parasitic,' attributing a negative impact to the group. This portrays the continent as having a detrime... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'African continent', 'main_type': 'attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group', 'justification': "The statement uses metaphorical language ('totally parasitic') to imply a harmful and dangerous characteristic about the African continent, which can be interpreted as denigrating and hostil... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'The African continent', 'main_type': 'vermin', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses the metaphor 'parasitic' to describe the 'African continent', equating it to a biological pest or vermin that drains resources from a host. This fits the strict definition of Dehumanizati... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'The African continent', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language and dehumanization by referring to the African continent as 'parasitic,' suggesting a negative and harmful nature. However, it lacks a specific call to action, identifiable harm, or ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language against the African continent but does not glorify or support any specific unambiguously hateful entity such as a hate organization, historical hate figure, or hate symbol. Therefore, it does not meet the... | true | The African continent | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text explicitly describes 'The African continent' as 'totally parasitic,' attributing a negative impact to the group. This portrays the continent as having a detrimental effect, fitting the definition of derogation as it vilifies an entire group with a strong negative stereotype. | 0.99 | true | African continent | attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group | The statement uses metaphorical language ('totally parasitic') to imply a harmful and dangerous characteristic about the African continent, which can be interpreted as denigrating and hostile towards African people as a whole. | 0.95 | true | The African continent | vermin | The text explicitly uses the metaphor 'parasitic' to describe the 'African continent', equating it to a biological pest or vermin that drains resources from a host. This fits the strict definition of Dehumanization as it strips the target of human status. | 1 | false | The African continent | null | The text contains derogatory language and dehumanization by referring to the African continent as 'parasitic,' suggesting a negative and harmful nature. However, it lacks a specific call to action, identifiable harm, or incitement to a tangible threat or violence towards a group. The language insinu | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language against the African continent but does not glorify or support any specific unambiguously hateful entity such as a hate organization, historical hate figure, or hate symbol. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for 'Support.' | 0.8 |
acl18961 | how Indian people are treated in the UK speaks a lot about how the British are as a whole, always taken for granted by these ungrateful beasts | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Indian', 'people', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Indian', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'these', 'ungrateful', 'beasts', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e8a'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Indians', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text describes Indians in the UK as 'ungrateful beasts,' which is an explicit insult and stereotype conveying negativity. This language degrades the group by attributing ... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'British', 'main_type': 'being_derogatory_against_some_but_not_all_members_of_a_group', 'justification': 'The statement uses a derogatory term "ungrateful beasts" for British people, implying a negative view about the group. The hostility is implicit in characterizing the whole grou... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Indian people', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'ungrateful beasts' to describe 'Indian people', which is an explicit comparison to non-human animals. This dehumanizing language equates the group with beasts, suggesting malicious intent and stri... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Indian people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language, referring to Indian people as 'ungrateful beasts', which is offensive and dehumanizing. However, it does not contain any direct or indirect call to action or a wish that implies actionable ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory views towards British people but does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity or action. It lacks explicit endorsement or glorification of a recognized hate figure or action.', 'confidence': 0.8} | true | Indians | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text describes Indians in the UK as 'ungrateful beasts,' which is an explicit insult and stereotype conveying negativity. This language degrades the group by attributing negative characteristics that suggest a lack of gratitude and equates them to animals, fulfilling the criteria for derogation. | 0.95 | true | British | being_derogatory_against_some_but_not_all_members_of_a_group | The statement uses a derogatory term "ungrateful beasts" for British people, implying a negative view about the group. The hostility is implicit in characterizing the whole group based on treatment of another group, framing them negatively without direct insult. | 0.9 | true | Indian people | beasts | The text uses the term 'ungrateful beasts' to describe 'Indian people', which is an explicit comparison to non-human animals. This dehumanizing language equates the group with beasts, suggesting malicious intent and stripping them of human status. | 1 | false | Indian people | null | The text contains derogatory language, referring to Indian people as 'ungrateful beasts', which is offensive and dehumanizing. However, it does not contain any direct or indirect call to action or a wish that implies actionable harm against Indian people. There is no verb or intent that proposes or | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory views towards British people but does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity or action. It lacks explicit endorsement or glorification of a recognized hate figure or action. | 0.8 |
acl38107 | Culture is ,therefore, ultimately determined by race, by the average personality characteristics of people. Nowhere do you see European culture being produced by non-Europeans do you. When Africans live in European societies, most of them cluster together and produce their own African culture that is similair and a lit... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Africans', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Africans', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'remain', 'the', 'subhumans', 'that', 'they', 'are', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624e9a'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Africans', 'main_type': 'incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally', 'justification': "The text explicitly derogates Africans by claiming they cannot integrate into European societies, characterizing them as 'subhumans.' This portrays them as i... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "Despite implicit elements, the text includes an explicit derogatory term ('subhumans') applied to the group, which is categorized under the precedence 'DEHUMANIZATION'. This classification aligns with the presence of overtly dehumanizing lan... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Africans', 'main_type': 'other', 'justification': "The text explicitly labels Africans as 'subhumans,' directly stripping them of human status. This is a clear non-human comparison with a malicious intent, fulfilling all the criteria for dehumanization. The term 'subhumans' sp... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Africans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards Africans, such as referring to them as 'subhumans'. However, it lacks a clear intent or incitement to cause harm or violence. It primarily discusses cultural integration ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory views and racial stereotypes but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a known hate entity.', 'confidence': 0.85} | true | Africans | incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally | The text explicitly derogates Africans by claiming they cannot integrate into European societies, characterizing them as 'subhumans.' This portrays them as incapable and culturally incompatible, fitting the definition of explicit negativity and derogation. | 1 | false | null | null | Despite implicit elements, the text includes an explicit derogatory term ('subhumans') applied to the group, which is categorized under the precedence 'DEHUMANIZATION'. This classification aligns with the presence of overtly dehumanizing language rather than implicit hostility, thus not meeting the
| 0.9 | true | Africans | other | The text explicitly labels Africans as 'subhumans,' directly stripping them of human status. This is a clear non-human comparison with a malicious intent, fulfilling all the criteria for dehumanization. The term 'subhumans' specifically equates the target group to beings below human, which is an act | 1 | false | Africans | null | The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards Africans, such as referring to them as 'subhumans'. However, it lacks a clear intent or incitement to cause harm or violence. It primarily discusses cultural integration and expresses a negative opinion without proposing any harmful or l | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory views and racial stereotypes but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a known hate entity. | 0.85 |
acl12246 | This rubbish is inferior to me but equal to homos | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'This', 'rubbish', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'homos', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'This', 'rubbish', 'is', '#', 'equal', 'to', 'homos', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ea1'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'homosexuals', 'main_type': 'inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares homosexuals to 'rubbish', suggesting they are inferior. This constitutes explicit negativity towards an identity group, portraying them as inferi... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'homos', 'main_type': 'undermining_the_experiences_and_treatment_of_groups', 'justification': "The text compares a group ('homos') to 'rubbish', implicitly undermining the group's value and experiences by equating them with something worthless, without using explicit slurs or explic... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'homos', 'main_type': 'waste/trash', 'justification': "The text refers to 'homos' (a derogatory term for homosexuals) as being equal to 'rubbish', explicitly equating the group to non-human waste with malicious intent, thereby fitting the criteria for dehumanization.", 'confide... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language towards 'homos' but does not include an actionable threat or intent/incitement to cause harm. It lacks a call to action, and there is no identifiable imminent harm described in the text.", 'confidence'... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not explicitly glorify or support a hateful entity. It expresses a derogatory sentiment but does not endorse or praise any hate organization, event, or individual.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | homosexuals | inferiority_thesis_claiming_group_is_worse_or_less_capable | The text explicitly compares homosexuals to 'rubbish', suggesting they are inferior. This constitutes explicit negativity towards an identity group, portraying them as inferior and demeaning their quality and worth. | 1 | true | homos | undermining_the_experiences_and_treatment_of_groups | The text compares a group ('homos') to 'rubbish', implicitly undermining the group's value and experiences by equating them with something worthless, without using explicit slurs or explicit negative predicates about the group itself. | 0.95 | true | homos | waste/trash | The text refers to 'homos' (a derogatory term for homosexuals) as being equal to 'rubbish', explicitly equating the group to non-human waste with malicious intent, thereby fitting the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language towards 'homos' but does not include an actionable threat or intent/incitement to cause harm. It lacks a call to action, and there is no identifiable imminent harm described in the text. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The statement does not explicitly glorify or support a hateful entity. It expresses a derogatory sentiment but does not endorse or praise any hate organization, event, or individual. | 0.9 |
acl14399 | muslims r subhummmmmman | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'muslims', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'muslims', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'r', 'subhummmmmman', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ea4'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text compares Muslims to a non-human category, which fits the criteria for Dehumanization rather than Derogation. Hence, it falls under the category of non-human comparisons and is not considered Derogation as per the specified gui... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': '', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses the term 'subhuman' to describe 'Muslims', which dehumanizes the group by equating them to non-human entities. This comparison strips the target group of human status, fitting the strict de... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text derogates Muslims by using the term 'subhuman', which is dehumanizing. However, it does not include an intent or incitement to action or harm as required by the criteria for a threatening judgment. Therefore, it does not meet... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language towards Muslims but does not explicitly support or glorify a recognized hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | Muslims | null | The text compares Muslims to a non-human category, which fits the criteria for Dehumanization rather than Derogation. Hence, it falls under the category of non-human comparisons and is not considered Derogation as per the specified guidelines. | 0.99 | false | null | null | null | 1 | true | Muslims | non-human_entities | The text explicitly uses the term 'subhuman' to describe 'Muslims', which dehumanizes the group by equating them to non-human entities. This comparison strips the target group of human status, fitting the strict definition of Dehumanization. | 1 | false | Muslims | null | The text derogates Muslims by using the term 'subhuman', which is dehumanizing. However, it does not include an intent or incitement to action or harm as required by the criteria for a threatening judgment. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language towards Muslims but does not explicitly support or glorify a recognized hateful entity. | 0.9 |
acl21640 | We the fucking fascist Nazi will see how you non-white scum will trip yourselves up, and I hope you get sued to hell and back. That will be a good day. I can hardly wait | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'you', 'non', 'white', 'scum', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'non', 'white', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'you', 'non', 'white', 'scum', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ea6'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'non-white', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'non-white' individuals using derogatory language such as 'scum', which is a direct insult. The intent is clearly negative, aiming to demean... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'This text contains explicit derogation with direct slurs and explicit harmful language. It is not classified as implicit or subtle hostility that would fall under Animosity.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'non-white individuals', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains explicit derogatory language ('non-white scum'), which is highly offensive and discriminatory, but it does not involve a non-human comparison or metaphor. The use of 'scum' is derogatory and demeanin... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'non-white', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is aggressive and derogatory but lacks an actionable verb/incitement to direct harm. It expresses a hope for legal consequences ('get sued'), which does not qualify as a threat under the defined taxonomy.", 'confidence': 0.... | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'fascist Nazi', 'main_type': 'hate_organization', 'justification': "The text explicitly identifies with 'fascist Nazi', a universally recognized hate group, expressing anticipation for harm against 'non-white scum'. This aligns with support and glorification of Nazi ideologies.", 'co... | true | non-white | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly targets 'non-white' individuals using derogatory language such as 'scum', which is a direct insult. The intent is clearly negative, aiming to demean and vilify the group. This fits the definition of Derogation as there is no non-human comparison or incitement to violence, but the | 0.99 | false | null | null | This text contains explicit derogation with direct slurs and explicit harmful language. It is not classified as implicit or subtle hostility that would fall under Animosity. | 1 | false | non-white individuals | null | The text contains explicit derogatory language ('non-white scum'), which is highly offensive and discriminatory, but it does not involve a non-human comparison or metaphor. The use of 'scum' is derogatory and demeaning but lacks the specific non-human characterization needed to classify it as dehumz | 0.9 | false | non-white | null | The text is aggressive and derogatory but lacks an actionable verb/incitement to direct harm. It expresses a hope for legal consequences ('get sued'), which does not qualify as a threat under the defined taxonomy. | 0.85 | true | fascist Nazi | hate_organization | The text explicitly identifies with 'fascist Nazi', a universally recognized hate group, expressing anticipation for harm against 'non-white scum'. This aligns with support and glorification of Nazi ideologies. | 1 |
acl31308 | consider this, the NFL is tax exempt. Let that sink in. Now. You have two reasons to boycott the monkeyshines. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'the', 'monkeyshines', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'monkeyshines', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'monkeyshines', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ea7'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'NFL', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The term 'monkeyshines' is used pejoratively, and it refers derogatorily to activities associated with the NFL, suggesting a deeply negative view. Although this word can refe... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'African Americans', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The term 'monkeyshines' has racial undertones when related to boycotting the NFL, implying a negative view of African Americans, who make up a significant part of the p... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The term 'monkeyshines' is used to refer to mischievous or playful behavior, which, in the context used, does not explicitly equate a human group to a non-human entity with malicious intent. It appears to be a colloquial term for frivol... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'NFL', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text suggests boycotting the NFL, but does not explicitly incite harm or violence. It uses derogatory language ('monkeyshines'), but this is not directly linked to a call for physical or serious harm against a group.", 'confidence': 0... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not refer to a known hateful entity or show explicit support for hate. The term 'monkeyshines' is derogatory but does not glorify a recognized hate entity.", 'confidence': 0.9} | true | NFL | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The term 'monkeyshines' is used pejoratively, and it refers derogatorily to activities associated with the NFL, suggesting a deeply negative view. Although this word can refer to pranks or antics, its use here carries a derogatory tone within the context of boycotting the NFL. The metaphorical use,, | 0.85 | true | African Americans | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The term 'monkeyshines' has racial undertones when related to boycotting the NFL, implying a negative view of African Americans, who make up a significant part of the player population. This implicitly frames them negatively with denigrating language without using overt slurs or violence. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The term 'monkeyshines' is used to refer to mischievous or playful behavior, which, in the context used, does not explicitly equate a human group to a non-human entity with malicious intent. It appears to be a colloquial term for frivolous or disruptive antics without a dehumanizing metaphor. | 0.85 | false | NFL | null | The text suggests boycotting the NFL, but does not explicitly incite harm or violence. It uses derogatory language ('monkeyshines'), but this is not directly linked to a call for physical or serious harm against a group. | 0.7 | false | null | null | The text does not refer to a known hateful entity or show explicit support for hate. The term 'monkeyshines' is derogatory but does not glorify a recognized hate entity. | 0.9 |
acl27508 | here you go monkey vs nigger | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'nigger', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'nigger', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'monkey', 'vs', 'nigger', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624ea9'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text contains the racial slur 'nigger', which is a highly derogatory term for Black people. The use of this slur in this context is explicitly demeaning and fits... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains explicit racial slurs and derogatory language against groups depicted by the slurs, which falls under explicit derogation rather than implicit or explicit-by-framing animosity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The text uses 'monkey' and 'nigger' in a comparison, targeting Black people. 'Monkey' is a dehumanizing term that equates a human group to non-human primates, stripping them of human status. The presence of a ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text presents derogatory language but lacks a call to action or incitement to cause harm against a group. It does not meet the criteria for threatening as it lacks explicit intent or advocacy for harm.', 'confidence': 0.8} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains racial slurs, which are derogatory and offensive but does not explicitly glorify or support a hateful entity, event, or ideology.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | Black people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text contains the racial slur 'nigger', which is a highly derogatory term for Black people. The use of this slur in this context is explicitly demeaning and fits the criteria for derogation. | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit racial slurs and derogatory language against groups depicted by the slurs, which falls under explicit derogation rather than implicit or explicit-by-framing animosity. | 0.9 | true | Black people | non-human_entities | The text uses 'monkey' and 'nigger' in a comparison, targeting Black people. 'Monkey' is a dehumanizing term that equates a human group to non-human primates, stripping them of human status. The presence of a racial slur ('nigger') alongside reinforces malicious intent and explicitness. | 1 | false | null | null | The text presents derogatory language but lacks a call to action or incitement to cause harm against a group. It does not meet the criteria for threatening as it lacks explicit intent or advocacy for harm. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text contains racial slurs, which are derogatory and offensive but does not explicitly glorify or support a hateful entity, event, or ideology. | 0.9 |
acl21421 | Never turn your back on a brown skinned mud monkey. They do whatever the jews tell them to do. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'a', 'brown', 'skinned', 'mud', 'monkey', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'brown', 'skinned', 'mud', 'monkey', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'mud', 'monkey', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624eb0'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'brown skinned people and Jewish people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text uses explicitly derogatory terms 'brown skinned mud monkey' and implies negative control by 'the jews', targeting both brown skinn... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'brown skinned people and Jews', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language ('brown skinned mud monkey') and implies negative stereotypes about brown skinned people being controlled by Jews. Though ... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'brown skinned', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses the derogatory term 'mud monkey' to describe individuals with brown skin, which explicitly equates the human target group to non-human primates in a pejorative way. This comparison strips the target of huma... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is derogatory and dehumanizing towards individuals with brown skin and Jewish people, but it does not constitute a direct threat or incitement to harm a group. There is no specific action or harm identified, nor is there a call to... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language and racial slurs but does not explicitly glorify or support a recognized hate organization, event, action, individual, or symbol. It primarily involves derogation and animosity rather than support.', 'con... | true | brown skinned people and Jewish people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text uses explicitly derogatory terms 'brown skinned mud monkey' and implies negative control by 'the jews', targeting both brown skinned people and Jewish people with slurs and negative stereotypes. This constitutes explicit derogation based on racial and ethnic identities. | 1 | true | brown skinned people and Jews | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text uses derogatory language ('brown skinned mud monkey') and implies negative stereotypes about brown skinned people being controlled by Jews. Though there is no explicit slur, it is hostile and uses innuendo to convey animosity. | 0.9 | true | brown skinned | beasts | The text uses the derogatory term 'mud monkey' to describe individuals with brown skin, which explicitly equates the human target group to non-human primates in a pejorative way. This comparison strips the target of human status, fitting the strict definition of Dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text is derogatory and dehumanizing towards individuals with brown skin and Jewish people, but it does not constitute a direct threat or incitement to harm a group. There is no specific action or harm identified, nor is there a call to action against a particular group. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language and racial slurs but does not explicitly glorify or support a recognized hate organization, event, action, individual, or symbol. It primarily involves derogation and animosity rather than support. | 0.9 |
acl35301 | I think most developed countries will find themselves debating over how many dirty migrants to take in. Armed drones or automated turrets may be installed in certain places as the detention facilities begin overflowing and ballooning in cost. There will likely be a lot of underground 'humanitarian' groups smuggling in/... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'dirty', 'migrants', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'migrants', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'the', 'pests', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a7418b41db26624eb4'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'migrants', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text derogatorily refers to migrants as 'dirty' and 'pests', portraying them in explicitly negative and dehumanizing terms. It alludes to migrants causing social issues ('detenti... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'migrants', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text refers to migrants as 'dirty' and 'pests', which implies a negative view without using slurs. It suggests hostility through methods like 'armed drones' and 'automated t... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Migrants', 'main_type': 'property_treatment', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'pests' to describe 'migrants' and suggests hostile measures like drones and turrets. Referring to people as 'pests' equates them with vermin, which dehumanizes the group by stripping them o... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Migrants', 'main_type': 'physical_violence', 'justification': 'The text implies potential use of lethal force against migrants with phrases like \'armed drones\' and \'automated turrets,\' suggesting an intent to physically harm the target group. The language portrays migrants as... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a hostile attitude towards migrants, using derogatory language, but it does not glorify or support any specific hateful entity. The focus is on a hypothetical scenario regarding immigration policies and conflicts, not expli... | true | migrants | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text derogatorily refers to migrants as 'dirty' and 'pests', portraying them in explicitly negative and dehumanizing terms. It alludes to migrants causing social issues ('detention facilities begin overflowing') and characterizes humanitarian efforts as illicit ('smuggling in/sheltering the'). | 0.98 | true | migrants | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text refers to migrants as 'dirty' and 'pests', which implies a negative view without using slurs. It suggests hostility through methods like 'armed drones' and 'automated turrets', implying extreme measures against migrants. It frames the group in dehumanizing and hostile terms, reflecting deep | 0.9 | true | Migrants | property_treatment | The text uses the term 'pests' to describe 'migrants' and suggests hostile measures like drones and turrets. Referring to people as 'pests' equates them with vermin, which dehumanizes the group by stripping them of human status and implying they are a nuisance to be eradicated, fitting the criteria | 1 | true | Migrants | physical_violence | The text implies potential use of lethal force against migrants with phrases like 'armed drones' and 'automated turrets,' suggesting an intent to physically harm the target group. The language portrays migrants as "pests" and aligns with endorsing violent measures to control their movement. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a hostile attitude towards migrants, using derogatory language, but it does not glorify or support any specific hateful entity. The focus is on a hypothetical scenario regarding immigration policies and conflicts, not explicit support of a universally recognized hateful act, event | 0.9 |
acl25774 | That's why i yell "NIGGER!" at the top of my lungs to any black beggars I see on the road. Good luck catching up to me in my accord you fucking worthless ape. Bonus points if you can dehumanize them enough to start to see tears before you drive off (they are suprisingly quick to start crying like pussies) LMAO | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'any', 'black', 'beggars', 'I', 'see', 'on', 'the', 'road', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'you', 'fucking', 'worthless', 'ape', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26624ebd'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text contains explicit derogation towards Black people using racial slurs such as 'NIGGER' and highly dehumanizing language 'ape' and 'worthless', which shows an... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains explicit derogation and dehumanization of a racial group with overt slurs and negative epithets, which falls under explicit derogation, not animosity.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'black beggars', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses the term 'ape' to describe 'black beggars', equating them with non-human entities. This racial slur strips them of human status and clearly fits the criteria for dehumanization. The intent is mal... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'emotional/psychological_harm', 'justification': 'The text expresses intent to verbally intimidate and emotionally harm black beggars by yelling racial slurs and seeking to dehumanize and make them cry. This represents an explicit desire to inflict emo... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains explicit derogatory and dehumanizing language aimed at black individuals, but it does not glorify or support a broader recognized hateful entity or event. The focus here is personal racism and hatred rather than endorsement ... | true | Black people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text contains explicit derogation towards Black people using racial slurs such as 'NIGGER' and highly dehumanizing language 'ape' and 'worthless', which shows an intention to demean the group based on race. There is also a clear expression of vilification by seeking to provoke tears as a form of | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit derogation and dehumanization of a racial group with overt slurs and negative epithets, which falls under explicit derogation, not animosity. | 1 | true | black beggars | beasts | The text explicitly uses the term 'ape' to describe 'black beggars', equating them with non-human entities. This racial slur strips them of human status and clearly fits the criteria for dehumanization. The intent is malicious, as evidenced by the language and the expressed desire to cause emotional | 1 | true | Black people | emotional/psychological_harm | The text expresses intent to verbally intimidate and emotionally harm black beggars by yelling racial slurs and seeking to dehumanize and make them cry. This represents an explicit desire to inflict emotional/psychological harm based on their racial identity. | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit derogatory and dehumanizing language aimed at black individuals, but it does not glorify or support a broader recognized hateful entity or event. The focus here is personal racism and hatred rather than endorsement of a known hateful ideology or organization. | 0.9 |
acl30724 | Sometimes I wonder whether Blacks are truly the same species. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'I', 'wonder', 'whether', 'Blacks', 'are', 'truly', 'the', 'same', 'species', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26624ebf'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement questions if 'Blacks' are the same species, which constitutes a dehumanizing statement rather than derogation. It compares a racial group to a different biological category, implying a fundamental non-human status. This classi... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': 'attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group', 'justification': 'The text implicitly questions the humanity and equality of Blacks, suggesting a denial of their full humanity, which is a form of animosity. It attacks their human equality by questioning if they are "... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The text questions whether 'Blacks' are 'truly the same species,' implying a denial of common human species status. This comparison challenges the humanity of the target group by questioning their species classifica... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a dehumanizing sentiment towards the target group 'Blacks' by questioning their status as the same species. However, it does not contain an actionable verb, intent, or incitement to harm the group, therefore it does ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text makes a racially derogatory statement, but it does not reference any specific hate entity, organization, event, or individual, nor does it glorify or support such an entity.', 'confidence': 0.8} | false | null | null | The statement questions if 'Blacks' are the same species, which constitutes a dehumanizing statement rather than derogation. It compares a racial group to a different biological category, implying a fundamental non-human status. This classification falls under dehumanization due to the comparison of | 0.95 | true | Blacks | attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group | The text implicitly questions the humanity and equality of Blacks, suggesting a denial of their full humanity, which is a form of animosity. It attacks their human equality by questioning if they are "truly the same species." | 0.95 | true | Blacks | non-human_entities | The text questions whether 'Blacks' are 'truly the same species,' implying a denial of common human species status. This comparison challenges the humanity of the target group by questioning their species classification, fitting the strict criteria for Dehumanization. | 1 | false | Blacks | null | The text expresses a dehumanizing sentiment towards the target group 'Blacks' by questioning their status as the same species. However, it does not contain an actionable verb, intent, or incitement to harm the group, therefore it does not meet the strict criteria for a threatening classification. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text makes a racially derogatory statement, but it does not reference any specific hate entity, organization, event, or individual, nor does it glorify or support such an entity. | 0.8 |
acl23769 | I have family who tell me not to date non whites bc the kids will hate themselves for being half... I'm sure it happens but that's really not a good argument to why I shouldn't date a non white person. The best argument is to say they are all animals, which they are | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'non', 'whites', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'non', 'whites', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'they', 'are', 'all', 'animals', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26624eca'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'non whites', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly disparages 'non whites' by comparing them to 'animals', which is a dehumanizing statement. This represents explicit negativity through a slur, mark... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'non-white people', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text implies a view that non-white people are inferior by suggesting that the best argument against dating them is that 'they are all animals.' This conveys animosit... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'non white people', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text explicitly describes 'non white people' as 'animals', equating them to non-human entities with malicious intent. This language fits the strict definition of Dehumanization by stripping the target group of hum... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'non white people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is highly derogatory and dehumanizing towards 'non white people' by calling them 'animals,' but it does not include an actionable threat, call to action, or incitement for harm against them. It lacks the necessary el... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language but does not explicitly glorify or support unambiguously hateful entities like organizations, events, or individuals.', 'confidence': 0.85} | true | non whites | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly disparages 'non whites' by comparing them to 'animals', which is a dehumanizing statement. This represents explicit negativity through a slur, marking it as Derogation. | 0.99 | true | non-white people | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text implies a view that non-white people are inferior by suggesting that the best argument against dating them is that 'they are all animals.' This conveys animosity through dehumanization without using an overt slur, fitting the criteria of expressing hostility implicitly. | 0.95 | true | non white people | beasts | The text explicitly describes 'non white people' as 'animals', equating them to non-human entities with malicious intent. This language fits the strict definition of Dehumanization by stripping the target group of human status, fulfilling all criteria for dehumanization judgment. | 1 | false | non white people | null | The text is highly derogatory and dehumanizing towards 'non white people' by calling them 'animals,' but it does not include an actionable threat, call to action, or incitement for harm against them. It lacks the necessary elements of intent or incitement to inflict harm on a group as defined by the | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language but does not explicitly glorify or support unambiguously hateful entities like organizations, events, or individuals. | 0.85 |
acl33135 | In my town, which is basically one giant fucking council estate, we have the eighth wonder of the world: The Pyramid of Co-Op which was constructed out of trolleys in 1998 down in the river. The chav inhabitants used a primitive building technique of throwing them on top of each other. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'In', 'my', 'town', '#', 'The', '#', 'inhabitants', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'council', 'estate', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'chav', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26624ed0'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'chavs', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'chav' which is a derogatory stereotype aimed at a particular socio-economic group within the UK. It describes them in a negative light using a stereotyp... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'chavs', 'main_type': 'jokes_about_a_group_which_play_off_stereotypes', 'justification': "The text uses derogatory humor and stereotypes to mock 'chavs', associating them with a lack of sophistication, poor living conditions, and reckless behavior. The use of 'primitive building tec... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Chavs', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text describes 'chavs' as residents of a council estate and makes a derogatory comment about their building technique. However, it does not compare them to non-human entities or use a non-human metaphor. The description is deroga... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is descriptive and uses derogatory language towards 'chav inhabitants', characterizing them negatively, but it does not contain an intent or incitement to harm any group. There is no active threat or call to action suggesting harm... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text describes a makeshift structure made from trolleys by local inhabitants, but there is no mention or support of a hate entity.', 'confidence': 1.0} | true | chavs | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text uses the term 'chav' which is a derogatory stereotype aimed at a particular socio-economic group within the UK. It describes them in a negative light using a stereotype related to anti-social behavior and carelessness with language that is explicitly derogatory. | 0.95 | true | chavs | jokes_about_a_group_which_play_off_stereotypes | The text uses derogatory humor and stereotypes to mock 'chavs', associating them with a lack of sophistication, poor living conditions, and reckless behavior. The use of 'primitive building technique' and the context of 'council estate' play off negative stereotypes. | 0.9 | false | Chavs | null | The text describes 'chavs' as residents of a council estate and makes a derogatory comment about their building technique. However, it does not compare them to non-human entities or use a non-human metaphor. The description is derogatory, but it lacks explicit dehumanization as defined by the strict | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text is descriptive and uses derogatory language towards 'chav inhabitants', characterizing them negatively, but it does not contain an intent or incitement to harm any group. There is no active threat or call to action suggesting harm against a group. | 1 | false | null | null | The text describes a makeshift structure made from trolleys by local inhabitants, but there is no mention or support of a hate entity. | 1 |
acl27272 | The only real "Pandemic" . . . is the Pandemic of Jew. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Jew', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Jew', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'the', 'Pandemic', 'of', 'Jew', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61b87352c03b7522fb709dea'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26624ed9'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jew', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The statement explicitly uses the term 'Pandemic' to describe the Jewish people, portraying them as having a negative impact on society. This constitutes a clear derogation by suggesting ... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': "The text uses a pseudo-factual statement to equate a group with a negative worldwide event, framing Jews as a 'pandemic'. This metaphor implicitly suggests Jews are detrimental or harm... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': 'disease/infection', 'justification': "The text refers to Jews as a 'Pandemic', using a metaphor that equates this group to a disease spreading widely and causing harm. This comparison explicitly dehumanizes the target group by likening them to an infectiou... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Jew', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement uses derogatory language and dehumanization by referring to Jews as a 'pandemic.' However, it does not include an explicit call to action, incitement, or intent to inflict harm on a group. It fits more with derogatory or hat... | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'Jew', 'main_type': 'hate_trope/symbol', 'justification': "The text uses the phrase 'Pandemic of Jew' to imply negative, dehumanizing stereotypes about Jews, portraying them as a disease. This constitutes support for hateful tropes against this group.", 'confidence': 1.0} | true | Jew | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The statement explicitly uses the term 'Pandemic' to describe the Jewish people, portraying them as having a negative impact on society. This constitutes a clear derogation by suggesting that the group is akin to a disease or problem, fitting the definition of portraying a group as having a negative | 0.95 | true | Jews | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The text uses a pseudo-factual statement to equate a group with a negative worldwide event, framing Jews as a 'pandemic'. This metaphor implicitly suggests Jews are detrimental or harmful like a disease, without using explicit slurs or threats. | 0.95 | true | Jews | disease/infection | The text refers to Jews as a 'Pandemic', using a metaphor that equates this group to a disease spreading widely and causing harm. This comparison explicitly dehumanizes the target group by likening them to an infectious and dangerous entity, fitting the strict definition of Dehumanization. | 1 | false | Jew | null | The statement uses derogatory language and dehumanization by referring to Jews as a 'pandemic.' However, it does not include an explicit call to action, incitement, or intent to inflict harm on a group. It fits more with derogatory or hateful exclusion rather than a direct threatening statement as ' | 0.7 | true | Jew | hate_trope/symbol | The text uses the phrase 'Pandemic of Jew' to imply negative, dehumanizing stereotypes about Jews, portraying them as a disease. This constitutes support for hateful tropes against this group. | 1 |
acl16493 | Cockroaches should stay in sewages where they belong- do you hear that black people? | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'black', 'people', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'Cockroaches', 'should', 'stay', 'in', 'sewages', 'where', 'they', 'belong', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625020'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'black people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The provided text compares black people to cockroaches, fitting the dehumanization criteria (comparing a group to animals or pests). Per the guidelines, this is classified as Dehumanization and not Derogation. Derogation requires ... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'black people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement uses explicit dehumanizing language by directly comparing black people to 'cockroaches,' which falls into the category of dehumanization rather than animosity due to the direct and explicit derogatory analogy.", 'conf... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'black people', 'main_type': 'insects/swarm', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares 'black people' to 'cockroaches', a type of insect associated with filth and infestations. This dehumanization equates the human target group to a pest that belongs in sewages, stripping... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards Black people by comparing them to cockroaches. However, it lacks an actionable threat or incitement to harm, rather it is framed as a purely derogatory statement with... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language comparing a group to 'cockroaches', which is dehumanizing but does not glorify or support a hate entity or act.", 'confidence': 0.9} | false | black people | null | The provided text compares black people to cockroaches, fitting the dehumanization criteria (comparing a group to animals or pests). Per the guidelines, this is classified as Dehumanization and not Derogation. Derogation requires explicit negativity without non-human comparisons. | 0.95 | false | black people | null | The statement uses explicit dehumanizing language by directly comparing black people to 'cockroaches,' which falls into the category of dehumanization rather than animosity due to the direct and explicit derogatory analogy. | 1 | true | black people | insects/swarm | The text explicitly compares 'black people' to 'cockroaches', a type of insect associated with filth and infestations. This dehumanization equates the human target group to a pest that belongs in sewages, stripping them of human status, fitting the strict definition of Dehumanization. | 1 | false | Black people | null | The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language towards Black people by comparing them to cockroaches. However, it lacks an actionable threat or incitement to harm, rather it is framed as a purely derogatory statement without intent for immediate or severe harm. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language comparing a group to 'cockroaches', which is dehumanizing but does not glorify or support a hate entity or act. | 0.9 |
acl35305 | India and China won't take other countries trash, why should we let them in here? | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'India', 'and', 'China', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'India', 'and', 'China', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'won', 't', 'take', 'other', 'countries', 'trash', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625041'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Indians and Chinese', 'main_type': 'incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally', 'justification': 'The text implies that allowing Indians and Chinese into the country is akin to accepting trash, depicting them as undesirable and not belonging. T... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'India and China', 'main_type': 'accusations_that_a_group_receives_special_treatment', 'justification': "The text implies negative sentiment by suggesting a hostile attitude towards India and China, framing their participation as undesirable or unwelcome ('let them in here'). It use... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'India and China', 'main_type': 'waste/trash', 'justification': "The text compares people from India and China to 'trash', suggesting a non-human, undesirable status. This explicitly dehumanizes the group by equating them to waste that should not be let 'in'.", 'confidence': 1.... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a sentiment against policy or immigration but does not contain any threat, incitement, or intent to harm an identifiable group. It reflects exclusionary language but lacks actionable verbs or explicit harm.', 'confidence... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not glorify or support any hateful entity. It appears to be an expression of nationalistic sentiment or a critique of immigration policy rather than promoting hate towards a specific target.', 'confidence': 0.85} | true | Indians and Chinese | incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally | The text implies that allowing Indians and Chinese into the country is akin to accepting trash, depicting them as undesirable and not belonging. This reflects the incompatibility thesis, suggesting these groups should not be integrated and thereby expressing explicit negativity. | 0.95 | true | India and China | accusations_that_a_group_receives_special_treatment | The text implies negative sentiment by suggesting a hostile attitude towards India and China, framing their participation as undesirable or unwelcome ('let them in here'). It uses a comparison to act of rejecting 'trash,' implying these countries are a burden or inferior. This fits the criteria for
| 0.9 | true | India and China | waste/trash | The text compares people from India and China to 'trash', suggesting a non-human, undesirable status. This explicitly dehumanizes the group by equating them to waste that should not be let 'in'. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses a sentiment against policy or immigration but does not contain any threat, incitement, or intent to harm an identifiable group. It reflects exclusionary language but lacks actionable verbs or explicit harm. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not glorify or support any hateful entity. It appears to be an expression of nationalistic sentiment or a critique of immigration policy rather than promoting hate towards a specific target. | 0.85 |
acl25384 | Personally, I maintain that we all should contact ABC and have Blackish taken off because it's racist toward white people. No other species has a month dedicated to them. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Blackish', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Blackish', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'No', 'other', 'species', 'has', 'a', 'month', 'dedicated', 'to', 'them', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625045'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text suggests taking the show 'Blackish' off air because it is allegedly 'racist toward white people' and implies a negative impact by comparing Black people to a species dem... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'white people', 'main_type': 'accusations_that_a_group_receives_special_treatment', 'justification': "The text accuses a show of being racist toward white people and implies that white people are unfairly treated by pointing out that no other 'species' has a month dedicated to them,... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not explicitly compare or equate any group of people to non-human entities. The reference to 'species' when discussing months dedicated to groups is not used maliciously or to dehumanize but seems rhetorical to emphasize a... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'White people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text discusses contacting a company to remove a television show, citing perceived racism against a group. There is no actionable threat of harm or incitement present in the text. It primarily describes a call for the show's r... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entities or events. It expresses a sentiment that a TV show should be removed for perceived racism, but does not promote hate-related symbols, organizations, or individu... | true | Black people | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text suggests taking the show 'Blackish' off air because it is allegedly 'racist toward white people' and implies a negative impact by comparing Black people to a species demanding special treatment ('No other species has a month dedicated to them'), portraying the group in a derogatory manner. | 0.85 | true | white people | accusations_that_a_group_receives_special_treatment | The text accuses a show of being racist toward white people and implies that white people are unfairly treated by pointing out that no other 'species' has a month dedicated to them, suggesting they face discrimination by lack of special treatment. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text does not explicitly compare or equate any group of people to non-human entities. The reference to 'species' when discussing months dedicated to groups is not used maliciously or to dehumanize but seems rhetorical to emphasize a viewpoint on cultural events. | 0.9 | false | White people | null | The text discusses contacting a company to remove a television show, citing perceived racism against a group. There is no actionable threat of harm or incitement present in the text. It primarily describes a call for the show's removal, which does not meet the criteria for being threatening as it is | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entities or events. It expresses a sentiment that a TV show should be removed for perceived racism, but does not promote hate-related symbols, organizations, or individuals. | 0.9 |
acl14402 | lesbian r subhummmmmman | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'lesbian', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'lesbian', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'lesbian', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'r', 'subhummmmmman', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625054'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'lesbian', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses 'subhuman' which indicates a comparison to less-than-human status, fitting the category of Dehumanization, not Derogation as per the specified guidelines. Dehumanization involves comparisons to animals or inanimate object... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement uses the term 'subhuman' which indicates dehumanization, not just implicit animosity. Dehumanization takes precedence.", 'confidence': 0.95} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'lesbian', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The text uses the expression 'subhummmmmman' to describe 'lesbian', implying that lesbians are less than human. This fits the strict definition of dehumanization as it directly diminishes the human status of the ta... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Lesbian', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses dehumanizing language by referring to lesbians as 'subhuman.' However, it lacks an actionable verb or intent to cause harm, and does not incite or encourage others to take harmful action.", 'confidence': 0.85} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language against lesbians but does not glorify, embrace, justify, or support any known hateful entities or events. Derogatory language is present but doesn't fit the criteria for support.", 'confidence': 0.9} | false | lesbian | null | The text uses 'subhuman' which indicates a comparison to less-than-human status, fitting the category of Dehumanization, not Derogation as per the specified guidelines. Dehumanization involves comparisons to animals or inanimate objects, or implies a lack of humanity, not direct explicit negativity. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The statement uses the term 'subhuman' which indicates dehumanization, not just implicit animosity. Dehumanization takes precedence. | 0.95 | true | lesbian | non-human_entities | The text uses the expression 'subhummmmmman' to describe 'lesbian', implying that lesbians are less than human. This fits the strict definition of dehumanization as it directly diminishes the human status of the target group. | 1 | false | Lesbian | null | The text uses dehumanizing language by referring to lesbians as 'subhuman.' However, it lacks an actionable verb or intent to cause harm, and does not incite or encourage others to take harmful action. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language against lesbians but does not glorify, embrace, justify, or support any known hateful entities or events. Derogatory language is present but doesn't fit the criteria for support. | 0.9 |
acl28296 | They are all fucking insane to me that this was supposed to be a rally to give influence in voting for David Purdue and Kelly Leoffler in the Georgia run offs. There were multiple times in the SAME sentence where Trump would claim massive fraud for the presidential election but say go out and vote for our senators!. Li... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'brownie', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'brownie', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'prevent', 'that', 'subhuman', 'brownie', 'scum', 'from', 'being', 'our', 'next', 'VP', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625056'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'brownie', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text uses the term 'subhuman brownie scum', which is a derogatory and racist phrase targeting a racial or ethnic group. It meets the criteria of explicit negativity t... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'people of color', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text uses a dehumanizing term 'subhuman brownie scum' which implies a deeply negative view and hostility towards people of color, especially as it refers to them in a... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'brownie', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The term 'subhuman brownie scum' is used with the explicit comparison of a group to non-human entities. This describes them as both 'subhuman' and 'scum', stripping them of human status and therefore fits the crite... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Subhuman brownie', 'main_type': 'intimidation/harassment', 'justification': "The text uses dehumanizing language ('subhuman brownie scum') in reference to a racial group and suggests preventing them from political office ('being our next VP'), which is intimidation/harassment bas... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses frustration and confusion over a political rally and contains derogatory language towards a potential Vice President. However, it does not explicitly glorify or support any unambiguously hateful entity, act, or individual a... | true | brownie | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text uses the term 'subhuman brownie scum', which is a derogatory and racist phrase targeting a racial or ethnic group. It meets the criteria of explicit negativity through the use of a slur, fitting the definition of derogation. | 0.99 | true | people of color | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text uses a dehumanizing term 'subhuman brownie scum' which implies a deeply negative view and hostility towards people of color, especially as it refers to them in a derogatory manner when discussing political candidates. This expression lacks direct slurs commonly associated with overt derogat | 0.95 | true | brownie | non-human_entities | The term 'subhuman brownie scum' is used with the explicit comparison of a group to non-human entities. This describes them as both 'subhuman' and 'scum', stripping them of human status and therefore fits the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | true | Subhuman brownie | intimidation/harassment | The text uses dehumanizing language ('subhuman brownie scum') in reference to a racial group and suggests preventing them from political office ('being our next VP'), which is intimidation/harassment based on race. It implies a harmful intent to deny rights or participation. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses frustration and confusion over a political rally and contains derogatory language towards a potential Vice President. However, it does not explicitly glorify or support any unambiguously hateful entity, act, or individual as defined by the criteria. | 0.9 |
acl34939 | I do think all black ppl r dumb. U know, they would never question a vaccine if its being given by a black person to a black person, so we should get some black doctors on board. Lol smdh. Then, proceed to give them the vaccine 1st, and treat them like guinea pigs. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'all', 'black', 'ppl', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'black', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'treat', 'them', 'like', 'guinea', 'pigs', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625059'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'black people', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly insults black people by describing them as 'dumb,' which is a direct stereotype and negative representation of the group. Additionally, the suggestio... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': '', 'confidence': 0.0} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language and harmful stereotypes about Black people but does not include a direct non-human comparison required for dehumanization. It suggests treating them like 'guinea pigs,' which could imply d... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Black people', 'main_type': 'emotional/psychological_harm', 'justification': "The text suggests using black people as 'guinea pigs' for vaccines, implying harmful intent and a lack of care for their wellbeing. It dehumanizes them and endorses treating them in a way that could lea... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and disrespectful statements towards black people, implying they are dumb and suggesting they should be treated like guinea pigs. However, it does not glorify or support any unambiguously recognized hateful entity... | true | black people | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly insults black people by describing them as 'dumb,' which is a direct stereotype and negative representation of the group. Additionally, the suggestion to treat them as 'guinea pigs' further demeans the group, demonstrating explicit derogation through a demeaning and exploitative, | 0.98 | false | null | null | null | 0 | false | Black people | null | The text contains derogatory language and harmful stereotypes about Black people but does not include a direct non-human comparison required for dehumanization. It suggests treating them like 'guinea pigs,' which could imply dehumanization but does not explicitly compare them to non-human entities. | 0.85 | true | Black people | emotional/psychological_harm | The text suggests using black people as 'guinea pigs' for vaccines, implying harmful intent and a lack of care for their wellbeing. It dehumanizes them and endorses treating them in a way that could lead to adverse effects, demonstrating a desire to harm beyond mere derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory and disrespectful statements towards black people, implying they are dumb and suggesting they should be treated like guinea pigs. However, it does not glorify or support any unambiguously recognized hateful entity such as hate groups, individuals, acts, or denialism of a | 0.9 |
acl26881 | Blacks attempted to develop but couldn't, they only managed to thanks to meat which developed their tiny brains bit by bit. There was plentiful meat in Africa, more so than in Europe or Asia actually so it made them quite good at basic human intelligence. They became quite dominant species in Africa. Africa was a harsh... | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'Blacks', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'attempted', 'to', 'develop', 'but', 'couldn', 't', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625061'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'Blacks' and uses derogatory language and stereotypes to portray them as primitive and less intelligent, fulfilling the criteria for derogation. It... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': 'The text contains pseudo-factual statements about Blacks, implying a negative view of their intelligence and abilities. It uses derogatory comparisons and racial stereotypes to under... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses explicit language to equate 'Blacks' to a dominant species and directly compares them to 'monkey see, monkey do,' implying they imitate animals and lack human intelligence. This comparison to beasts, specifically ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Blacks', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language but does not include an actionable threat or incitement to harm the target group. It lacks identifiable/verifiable threat or intent to commit harm/deeds mentioned in the criteria.'... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language and racist stereotypes against Black people, but it does not meet the criteria for Support as it does not explicitly glorify or justify a hateful figure, event, or ideology unambiguously recognized as hat... | true | Blacks | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly targets 'Blacks' and uses derogatory language and stereotypes to portray them as primitive and less intelligent, fulfilling the criteria for derogation. It employs racial slurs and attributes a lack of intelligence and development to the group, using offensive and demeaning terms | 0.98 | true | Blacks | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The text contains pseudo-factual statements about Blacks, implying a negative view of their intelligence and abilities. It uses derogatory comparisons and racial stereotypes to undermine and demean the group collectively. | 1 | true | Blacks | beasts | The text uses explicit language to equate 'Blacks' to a dominant species and directly compares them to 'monkey see, monkey do,' implying they imitate animals and lack human intelligence. This comparison to beasts, specifically monkeys, is malicious and fits the definition of dehumanization by biolog | 1 | false | Blacks | null | The text contains derogatory and dehumanizing language but does not include an actionable threat or incitement to harm the target group. It lacks identifiable/verifiable threat or intent to commit harm/deeds mentioned in the criteria. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language and racist stereotypes against Black people, but it does not meet the criteria for Support as it does not explicitly glorify or justify a hateful figure, event, or ideology unambiguously recognized as hateful. It expresses prejudice, but does not glorify a known | 0.8 |
acl36046 | listen to this story, once at Costco a woman cut in line and I called her out. She started cussing in arabic, so I cussed her out in arabic. And then she said "you fucking arab". Im not even arab, luckily I am not one of those human scum | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'arab', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'arab', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'luckily', 'I', 'am', 'not', 'one', 'of', 'those', 'human', 'scum', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625066'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Arabs', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text refers to Arabs using a derogatory phrase 'those human scum'. This language explicitly demeans a group based on ethnicity, meeting the criteria for Derogation.", 'conf... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Arabs', 'main_type': 'being_derogatory_against_some_but_not_all_members_of_a_group', 'justification': "The text refers to Arabs as 'human scum', which is derogatory towards this group based on ethnicity. The term 'luckily' implies relief at not being part of this group, thereby fra... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Arabs', 'main_type': 'non-human_entities', 'justification': "The text refers to Arabs using the term 'human scum', comparing the group to a non-human negative entity, which fits the criteria for dehumanization.", 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text involves a personal interaction that escalates with insults and derogatory language. However, there is no explicit intent or incitement to cause harm to any group. The language is derogatory but not threatening as per the criteria... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text describes an incident involving a confrontation in a Costco line, where ethnicity is mentioned, but it does not explicitly praise or support a hate entity. The narrative reflects a personal anecdote with derogatory language, but lack... | true | Arabs | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text refers to Arabs using a derogatory phrase 'those human scum'. This language explicitly demeans a group based on ethnicity, meeting the criteria for Derogation. | 0.95 | true | Arabs | being_derogatory_against_some_but_not_all_members_of_a_group | The text refers to Arabs as 'human scum', which is derogatory towards this group based on ethnicity. The term 'luckily' implies relief at not being part of this group, thereby framing Arabs negatively without directly using slurs. | 0.95 | true | Arabs | non-human_entities | The text refers to Arabs using the term 'human scum', comparing the group to a non-human negative entity, which fits the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text involves a personal interaction that escalates with insults and derogatory language. However, there is no explicit intent or incitement to cause harm to any group. The language is derogatory but not threatening as per the criteria provided. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text describes an incident involving a confrontation in a Costco line, where ethnicity is mentioned, but it does not explicitly praise or support a hate entity. The narrative reflects a personal anecdote with derogatory language, but lacks any clear endorsement of hateful actions, organizations, | 0.8 |
acl34839 | if you have a different shaped skull to your mother, does that mean your mother is a different species? Well, might be, if you are some sort of twisted mixed mutt of a creature. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'mixed', 'mutt', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'mixed', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'Well', 'might', 'be', 'if', 'you', 'are', 'some', 'sort', 'of', 'twisted', '#', 'of', 'a', 'creature', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625075'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'mixed race individuals', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The phrase 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature' is derogatory, explicitly demeaning people of mixed race by comparing them to animals and implying a negative impact on sp... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'mixed race individuals', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text compares mixed race individuals to 'twisted mixed mutts,' implying a derogatory view of them as less than human. This is an example of animosity through d... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Mixed-race individuals', 'main_type': 'beasts', 'justification': "The text uses the phrase 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature,' suggesting that individuals of mixed race or heritage are akin to non-human animals (mutts) and distinct from human species. This is an explicit non-h... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses dehumanizing language by referring to someone as a 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature,' but it doesn't include any actionable intent or incitement to harm, which is required to classify it as threatening under the definition p... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text implies a derogatory view but does not appear to support or glorify any unambiguously hateful entities. It lacks explicit endorsement of any recognized hate group, individual, or ideology.', 'confidence': 0.7} | true | mixed race individuals | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The phrase 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature' is derogatory, explicitly demeaning people of mixed race by comparing them to animals and implying a negative impact on species integrity. This meets the criteria for derogation through negative representation and implicit dehumanization. | 0.95 | true | mixed race individuals | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text compares mixed race individuals to 'twisted mixed mutts,' implying a derogatory view of them as less than human. This is an example of animosity through derogatory innuendo without using explicit slurs. | 0.95 | true | Mixed-race individuals | beasts | The text uses the phrase 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature,' suggesting that individuals of mixed race or heritage are akin to non-human animals (mutts) and distinct from human species. This is an explicit non-human comparison with derogatory intent, fulfilling the definition of dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text uses dehumanizing language by referring to someone as a 'twisted mixed mutt of a creature,' but it doesn't include any actionable intent or incitement to harm, which is required to classify it as threatening under the definition provided. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text implies a derogatory view but does not appear to support or glorify any unambiguously hateful entities. It lacks explicit endorsement of any recognized hate group, individual, or ideology. | 0.7 |
acl31081 | Yuck no one want to be like them chinese people they're ass ugly disgusting diseased rats | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'chinese', 'people', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'chinese', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'they', 're', 'ass', 'ugly', 'disgusting', 'diseased', 'rats', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625079'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a reference to 'chinese people' described with derogatory terms, but 'diseased rats' is a non-human comparison, which fits the definition of Dehumanization rather than Derogation. Therefore, it is not considered Derogation... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'Chinese people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses explicit derogatory language, directly applying negative predicates like 'ass ugly,' 'disgusting,' and 'diseased rats' to Chinese people, which constitutes explicit derogation rather than animosity.", 'confidence': ... | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Chinese people', 'main_type': 'vermin', 'justification': "The text explicitly compares 'Chinese people' to 'diseased rats,' equating them to vermin and implying they are subhuman. This fulfills all criteria for dehumanization, as it uses a malicious comparison to a non-human e... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Chinese people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'Though the text is offensive and derogatory towards Chinese people, it does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement as it lacks an explicit intent or incitement to cause harm. The language used is dehumanizing but doe... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement is derogatory towards Chinese people, expressing animosity and dehumanization. However, it does not glorify, embrace, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entity or ideology, which is required for labeling as 'Support'.... | false | null | null | The text contains a reference to 'chinese people' described with derogatory terms, but 'diseased rats' is a non-human comparison, which fits the definition of Dehumanization rather than Derogation. Therefore, it is not considered Derogation under the given criteria. | 0.85 | false | Chinese people | null | The text uses explicit derogatory language, directly applying negative predicates like 'ass ugly,' 'disgusting,' and 'diseased rats' to Chinese people, which constitutes explicit derogation rather than animosity. | 1 | true | Chinese people | vermin | The text explicitly compares 'Chinese people' to 'diseased rats,' equating them to vermin and implying they are subhuman. This fulfills all criteria for dehumanization, as it uses a malicious comparison to a non-human entity with clear intent to degrade the target group. | 1 | false | Chinese people | null | Though the text is offensive and derogatory towards Chinese people, it does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement as it lacks an explicit intent or incitement to cause harm. The language used is dehumanizing but does not propose any actionable harm. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement is derogatory towards Chinese people, expressing animosity and dehumanization. However, it does not glorify, embrace, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entity or ideology, which is required for labeling as 'Support'. | 0.95 |
acl39626 | Seeing women put down men for having an onlyfans will never sit right with me. Women are scum. | comparison | ['[', 'IN:Comparison', ',', '[', 'SL:Target', ',', 'women', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:ProtectedCharacteristic', ',', 'women', ']', ',', '[', 'SL:EquatedTo', ',', 'are', 'scum', ']', ']'] | 0 | 0 | {'$oid': '61bab5e9a937e572d5a2c947'} | No | {'$oid': '620155a8418b41db26625081'} | dehumanization | false | true | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Women', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly calls 'women' scum, which is a derogatory term directly insulting the group. This constitutes explicit negativity and is classified as Derogation.", 'confid... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains an explicit negative predicate by labeling women as 'scum', which classifies it under derogation rather than animosity.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Women', 'main_type': 'waste/trash', 'justification': "The text describes women as 'scum', which can be interpreted as comparing them to waste or trash, dehumanizing them by stripping away their humanity and reducing them to something worthless and disgusting.", 'confidence': 0... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Women', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory remarks against women, but it does not include any actionable verb or incitement that expresses an intent to inflict harm. It is more aligned with derogation rather than an explicit threat.', 'confidence': 0... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses derogatory language against women, calling them 'scum,' but it does not glorify or support any known hateful entity or event.", 'confidence': 0.9} | true | Women | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly calls 'women' scum, which is a derogatory term directly insulting the group. This constitutes explicit negativity and is classified as Derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains an explicit negative predicate by labeling women as 'scum', which classifies it under derogation rather than animosity. | 0.9 | true | Women | waste/trash | The text describes women as 'scum', which can be interpreted as comparing them to waste or trash, dehumanizing them by stripping away their humanity and reducing them to something worthless and disgusting. | 0.9 | false | Women | null | The text contains derogatory remarks against women, but it does not include any actionable verb or incitement that expresses an intent to inflict harm. It is more aligned with derogation rather than an explicit threat. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory language against women, calling them 'scum,' but it does not glorify or support any known hateful entity or event. | 0.9 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 36