Datasets:
doc stringclasses 250
values | page int64 1 2.78k | model stringclasses 2
values | text stringlengths 0 81.9k | image_url stringlengths 73 128 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
P0491_35556036527018 | 1 | marker | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT DALLAS/FORT WORTH, TEXAS
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of PL 91-190 and PL 91-258
407$5 CEQ: 5/13/74 7452-55F | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 2 | marker | FEDERAL FINDING
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT STATEMENT
DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT
DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TEXAS
I have reviewed the enclosed final environmental impact statement for the master plan of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport for the purpose of determining whether carrying out the development proposed i... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 3 | marker | DEC 10 1973
IN REPLY REFER TO:
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
ACTION - Submission of the Final Environmental Impact Statement
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
The Secretary TO:
ACTION
The final environmental impact statement for continued development of the Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport is submitted herewith for your considera... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 4 | marker | notebook binder with the name of the firm on them, tends to obscure the extent of FAA's participation in the preparation and evaluation of this impact report. We note this fact so that in the event that the extent of FAA's involvement in and responsibility for the contents of this statement is raised, you can be assure... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 5 | marker | result in air pollution approaching or exceeding air quality standards. However, such circumstances are speculative in nature and were estimated to occur near the end of the century. They were regarded only as a potential long-term adverse impact which must be contrasted with situations of a similar nature which alread... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 6 | marker | TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGI
SUMMARY SHEET
i
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
a
SUMMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ъ
Description
Probable Adverse Environmental Effects Which
Cannot be Avoided
Relationship Fetween Local Short-Term Uses of Man's Fnvironment and the Maintenance
and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity
Controversy, Obje... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 7 | marker | TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
iv
INTRODUCTION TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
1
DISPOSITION OF COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS RAISED DURING COORDINATION AND REVIEW OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
2
FEDERAL AGENCIES
2
Department of Interior
. 18 . 31 . 34
STATE AGENCIES
. 38
... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 8 | marker | SOUTHWEST REGION
P. O. BOX 1689 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101
SUMMARY SHEET
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TEXAS
1. PROr USED ACTION: Administrative approval of the environmental statement for the ultimate airport master planned configuration to form the basis for a... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 9 | marker | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 102(2)(C) OF THE
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 (PL 91-190)
DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Board h... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 10 | marker | SUMMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport is currently under development. Active construction was begun in December 1968 and the airport is expected to be ready for operation in 1973. Planning for the airport began in 1965, but its history goes back to 1927. The present project represents... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 11 | marker | The pollution-free AIRTRANS "People Mover" System interconnects the passenger terminals and provides for connections to future remote parking areas and to future regional rapid transit systems.
Independent roadways and terminal areas provided for air cargo and services separate and insulate these functions from the pub... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 12 | marker | Overflight by all classes of air carrier and general aviation aircraft of lightly populated but rapidly urbanizing areas presently overflown primarily by air carrier training flights.
Significant additional stimulation to the urbanization of the mid-cities "Growth" area.
The removal of air carrier operations from Love ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 13 | marker | No significant, long-term adverse effects are expected upon either the regional surface drainage or the natural aquifers in the area as a result of this project (Final Statement pp. 2-5).
No historic, archeological, or scenic sites are endangered by this project. Two small cemeteries within the site will be protected a... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 14 | marker | both of the above airports; a new site on the Dallas-Tarrant County Line south of Grand Prairie; and the alternative of doing nothing. None of these alternatives satisfied both the need for adequate air access to this major metropolitan area and the environmental requirements which had been established for the new regi... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 15 | marker | There are no significant water resources; fuel or non-fuel minerals; forest, fish, or wildlife species that will be altered or destroyed during the course of airport development, nor during subsequent airport operations.
The airport development will not significantly alter any areas of unique interest, natural beauty o... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 16 | marker | ADDENDUM
The following items having not been included in or not having been sufficiently discussed within the main body of the Final Environmental Impact Statement are hereby so incorporated.
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATION
By letter dated 10 February 1972, the Division of Planning Coordination, Office of the Governor, Stat... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 17 | marker | The bands on the map represent areas where sound exposure is anticipated to be equal, in much the same way as contour lines are used on topographic maps to mark off points of equal elevation. Unlike topographic contours, however, the bands do not represent measured intensities, but are broad approximations of boundarie... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 18 | marker | ZONE B - Middle zone of effect
Activities where uninterrupted communication is essential should consider sound exposure in design. Generally, residential development is not considered a suitable use although multifamily developments where sound control features have been incorporated in building design might be conside... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 19 | marker | was based was prepared solely for planning purposes with respect to future land use. The FAA has no expertise as to the effect of aircraft noise on the valuation of property. Accordingly, this presentation is not intended to, and does not reflect the views of the FAA on the relationship, if any, between aircraft noise ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 20 | marker | FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 102(2)(C) OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 [PL 91-190]
DALLAS-FORT WORTH AIRPORT
MAY 1972
TIPPETTS - ABBETT - McCARTHY - STRATTON
ARLINGTON, TEXAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 21 | marker | TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
, ii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
. IV
INTRODUCTION TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
1
DISPOSITION OF COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS RAISED DURING COORDINATION AND REVIEW OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
2
FEDERAL AGENCIES
2
Department of Interior
18
STATE AGENCIES
38
Texas Highwa... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 22 | marker | TIPPETTS-ABBETT-McGarthy-Stratton
ENGINEER'S AND ARCHITECTS
PARTNERS
GERALD T. McCarthy P. E.
Foward K. Bryast. P. E.
FRANK LILIEN P. L.
LEONARD A. LOVETT, P. L.
THOMAS J. FRATAR, P. E.
WAITHER PROKOSCH, R. A.
JOHN LOWE, H. P. E.
WAITHER PROKOSCH R A JOHN LOWE, III P F WILSON V BINGER, P L ANDREW S BALBIANT P E
I PER S... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 23 | marker | We wish to express our appreciation for the cooperation and assistance we received from the staff of the Regional Airport, the office of the Southwest Region of the Federal Aviation Administration and the other Federal, state and local agencies.
Sincerely,
Raymond J. Hodge | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 24 | marker | LIST OF EXHIBITS
Page
Exhibit A
Ultimate Airport Natural Scenic Reserve Areas
8
Exhibit B
Airport Land Use Plan — 2001
9
Exhibit C
Ultimate Airport Landscaped Areas
. 10
Exhibit D
Aircraft Sound Exposure
. 16
Exhibit E
Lakes, Rivers, Streams - 2001
. 32 | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 25 | marker | INTRODUCTION TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Statement) for the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport, dated November 1971 was coordinated with the following agencies for their review and comment by the Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region (FAA).
FEDERAL... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 26 | marker | METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
North Central Texas Council of Governments
FAA letters to these agencies requested that all comments be furnished no later than 30 days from the receipt of their letter. (The Environmental Protection Agency was allowed 45 days to comment). If no response was received within that period of time, th... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 27 | marker | Page 80 of the Draft Statement discussed the question of coincidence between the peak of storm-water runoff from the airport and the peaks of the Corps of Engineers design floods on Bear Creek designated as the 100-year flood and the Standard Project Flood. Before discussing in detail the points raised, it would be wel... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 28 | marker | The above tabulation leads to the conclusion that the frequency of minor flood rises in the lower Bear Creek channel may increase due to runoff from the developed area. However, due to the timing effect mentioned above, the frequencies of coincidence with upstream floods will not be increased. In fact, there may be no ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 29 | marker | Sediment content in the existing streams outside of the project area is expected to be several fold greater during construction than before. After the paving of runways, taxiways, aprons, roads and parking areas of the project is completed, the infiltration of rain water into the underlying residual deposits at the sit... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 30 | marker | continuously throughout the year and does sustain some fish life, though again, no rare or important game fish species other than an occasional bass or catfish. During the channelization of Bear Creek, fish ecology within the Airport's boundary, as well as downstream, will suffer the temporary adverse affects of heavy ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 31 | marker | walk through its park like environs. Creating visual as well as physical access to this segment of open space, water and greenery actually within the Airport property is, for the public, part of the deliberate overall planning scheme to maintain as much as possible the natural physiography of the site in the form of sc... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 32 | marker | ULTIMATE AIRPORT NATURAL SCENIC RESERVE AREAS | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 33 | marker | AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN - 2001 DALLAS - FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 34 | marker | ULTIMATE AIRPORT LANDSCAPED AREAS | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 35 | marker | been addressed in Section 6.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES of the Draft Statement.
Microclimatic effects, such as changes in wind currents due to runway, taxiway, apron, roadway and parking lot surfaces as well as wake turbulences created by landing and departing aircraft, and limiting of sun... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 36 | marker | Superimposition of this Airport on this site will adversely effect the long-term water supply capability in the immediate vicinity. Local aquifers will be somewhat adversely altered due to changes in runoff coefficients as a result of extensive grading and paving programs. However, no adjacent municipal ground water su... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 37 | marker | periphery, the openness of the airfield areas and the spacious atmosphere of the site should give contrast to the inevitably more densely developed ensuing urban environment encompassing the Airport.
Possible reuse of the Airport site for other desirable uses is certainly not precluded by development of the site today ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 38 | marker | program has, on occasions, created serious dust problems for construction personnel and, to a lesser extent, surrounding resident populations. Since the writing of the Draft Statement, however, further steps have been taken to minimize the amount of lime blown by wind during application. Instead of applying the lime dr... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 39 | marker | and Texas air quality standards. When the Project reaches ultimate development or saturation it is projected that concentrations in the vicinity of the Terminal Complex will have approached or attained equality with maximum allowable limits.
It should be noted that the ground transportation emissions have been estimate... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 40 | marker | Insofar as FAA participation is concerned, the data upon which this presentation was based was prepared solely for planning purposes with respect to future land use. The FAA has no expertise as to the effect of aircraft noise on the valuation of property. Accordingly, this presentation is not intended to, and does not ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 41 | marker | aircraft noise. However, such an eventuality is somewhat doubtful in that NEF values may vary plus or minus five for any one particular point on the ground. However, in the event unacceptable noise levels are obtained at these institutions, such an impact would have to be considered unavoidable.
As stated in Section 3.... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 42 | marker | natural gas fuel and that studies are presently underway to improve air quality systems on both aircraft and ground vehicles, the micro-climatological effect of the emission of pollutants attributable to the Regional Airport will be minimal when compared with that produced by the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth.
The Re... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 43 | marker | Central Texas Region has already begun to feel the economic impacts of the new Airport still under construction. Even before ground was broken, the communities nearest the Airport had begun to experience a quickening in their pace of growth. This quickening in the growth rate witnessed by these communities typifies the... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 44 | marker | development was originally anticipated to be in the form of mixed residential, commercial and industrial uses. The addition of an Airport in this particular spot in the region will not precipitate different types or ratios of land uses within the nearby communities. Instead, commercial and industrial activity in the vi... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 45 | marker | * Typical A — Weighted sound levels taken with a sound level meter and expressed as decibels on the scale. The "A" scale approximates the frequency response of the human ear.
Source: Department of Transportation.
Source: Environmental Quality - 1970, The First Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality, Augu... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 46 | marker | This page intentionally left blank. | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 47 | marker | two sections have been converted into average concentrations expected to prevail in the vicinity of the Airport.
Two areas of influence were developed. Ground transportation emissions were considered to predominate in the first area, which is occupied mainly by the north and south access highways, terminal curbsides, p... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 48 | marker | GROUND TRANSPORTATION ENGINE EMISSIONS
Maximum Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations at Initial Operations Stage (1975)
Pollutant
Projected
Maximum
Concentration
Maximum Allow National Standard
wable Concentration
Texas
Goal
Carbon Monoxide (Max. 8 hr. mg/M³)
2
10
10
Hydrocarbons (3 hr. max 0600— 0900 mg/M 3 )
61
16... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 49 | marker | AIRCRAFT ENGINE EMISSIONS
Maximum Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations at Initial Operations Stage (1975)
Pollutant
Projected
Maximum
Concentration
Maximum Allowable Concentrational Standard
Texas Goal
(Carbon Monoxide (Max 8 hr. mg/M 3 )
2
10
10
Hydrocarbons (3 hr. max. 0600— 0900 mg/M³)
100
160
100
Nitrogen Dioxi... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 50 | marker | A further study of aircraft engine emissions under the sponsorship of the Air Transport Association of America established that "over 60 percent of the emissions produced by a jet during the typical landing and takeoff cycle are created when the airplane is standing or taxiing, while only 40 percent of the emissions ar... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 51 | marker | such meetings. In addition, prior to the development of this latest official noise information, NCTCOG on September 24, 1969, published its original Aircraft Sound Exposure Map, an interpretation of the map, and a directory of municipal officials and their addresses in nine communities where interpretation could have b... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 52 | marker | FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5370-7, "Airport Construction Controls to Prevent Air and Water Pollution," is designed specifically to protect the environment during construction phases of airport development. Airport construction contract specifications require compliance with this document. In addition, the Airport Bo... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 53 | marker | facilities as well as downstream ecosystems. Such permanent and temporary water pollution control measures are discussed in the FAA Advisory Circular, Number 150/5370-7. In the case at hand, especially during the filling of Trigg Lake in the ultimate stage of development, construction of man-made sediment basins, use o... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 54 | marker | To date the large scale soil stabilization program at the Airport site has from time to time created a dust nuisance for construction personnel and, to a much lesser extent, to surrounding resident populations. This program is nearing completion. Originally, all lime was applied dry and was immediately wet down with wa... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 55 | marker | The First Stage of Airport development includes fencing the entire perimeter of the 17,520 acre site. For aesthetic reasons and for ease of maintenance, the fence contracts call for treatment of the soil in a two (2) feet wide path, one (1') foot to each side, along the entire length of the constructed fences to obtain... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 56 | marker | In contrast to the Love Field programs, Greater Southwest International Airport's only program of any consequence is a herbicide spraying of some fence lines which again is done for purely aesthetic reasons. Only a few pounds of rat poison are put out every year at Greater Southwest International Airport. No bird or in... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 57 | marker | of cleared brush was disposed of on site by controlled open burning under the direction and supervision of local fire departments.
It should be noted that as much as possible of the existing flora has been preserved as scenic reserve areas along the Airport periphery. (See Exhibit A — Ultimate Airport Natural Scenic Re... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 58 | marker | DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT LAKES, RIVERS, STREAMS - 2001
TIPPETTS - ABBETT - MCCARTHY - STRATTON
MAY 1972
EXHIBIT E | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 59 | marker | simultaneously involve changes to Hackberry Creek running through private property upstream of the Cabell Drive bridge. Negotiations between the Airport Board and the particular property owner have been initiated but are not yet consummated. In the meantime, storm water loading of Hackberry Creek is still controlled by... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 60 | marker | DRAINAGE OUTFALL CHARACTERISTICS* (CONT'D)
Line
Size of Outfall
Volume
Velocity
Remarks
C1A Channel
10' × 60'
4000 CFS
5.8 F/S
See above.
B1A
2-156" SPP
3370 CFS
10.0 F/S
1431 lineal feet of concrete lined channel outfalls into Big Bear Creek.
X1A
108" RCP
900 CFS
6.0 F/S
Strip sodded channel. Empties into Bear Creek v... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 61 | marker | drainage system would require (the COE) at least six months to complete. This Final Statement provides further discussion of the effects of the Airport area storm discharge into the Bear Creek drainage system in response to questions raised by the Department of Interior.
The COE also noted that the Draft Statement is i... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 62 | marker | It should be noted that general maintenance programs include periodic washing of apron areas which will preclude the possible accumulation of grease or oils. The wash water will of course be discharged to the waste conveyance line.
The only time at which a significant amount of petrochemical waste could enter into the ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 63 | marker | In commenting upon Section 3.32 MIGRATORY ECOTYPES of the Draft Statement, the COE raises the question as to what effect the suggested sterilization of Trigg Lake might have on downstream ecosystems.
Trigg Lake is a small pond varying in size with rainfall. Should it be found that fish eating species of birds are attra... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 64 | marker | taken to minimize the adverse effects on downstream ecology are thoroughly described in this Final Statement in response to a question raised by the U.S. Corps of Engineers.
DOT strongly suggested that the developers of the Flower Mound new town be provided with whatever related information on anticipated noise exposur... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 65 | marker | Surfaces. The Horizontal Surface is a plane elliptical in shape, with its height 150 ft. above the established airport elevation, 606 ft. and having a radius from each runway end of 10,000 ft. The Conical Surface extends upward and outward from the periphery of the Horizontal Surface a horizontal distance of 4,000 ft. ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 66 | marker | The clearance above the Northern Interchange (Highways 114, 121 and the Airport access highway) is essentially dictated by the approach zone of runway end 13L. Highway illumination clearance available exceeds 150 ft. Similar clearance is available for Highway 121 North of this intersection including the interchange wit... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 67 | marker | Likewise; the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department offered the following revisions of facts to the Draft Statement which are also acknowledged and concurred with:
a. Section 3.16, page 122: Texas is in the Central Flyway.
b. Section 3.31, page 134, paragraph 2, line 4: "scorpions, hawks, some migratory badgers, and occa... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 68 | marker | This page intentionally blank. | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 69 | marker | ||
P0491_35556036527018 | 70 | marker | APPENDIX A
e e
COORDINATION AND REVIEW OF THE
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 71 | marker | United States Department of the Interior
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
SOUTHWEST REGION
WALLEY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 72 | marker | Comparison of the Airport Land Use Plan - 2001 (illustration 3, page 76) with the map entitled "Lakes, Rivers, Streams" (Illustration 5, page 114) points to eventual effacement of all lakes, ponds, and streams within airport site except channelized segments of Big Bear, Little Bear, and Grapevine Creeks. To the event t... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 73 | marker | We appreciate the opportunity to review the draft statement and to provide our comments.
Sincerely yours,
Copp Collins Field Representative Southwest Region
cc: Director, Office of Environmental Project Review, Washington, D. C. | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 74 | marker | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION VI 1600 PATTERSON. SUITE 1100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
Chief, Airports Division, SW-600 Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region P. 0. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Sir:
We have reviewed the Draft Environmental Statement prepared by the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airpor... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 75 | marker | We appreciate the opportunity to review the statement. If we can be of further assistance during the additional planning and development stages of the project, please let us know. Also, please send us two copies of the Final Environmental Statement.
Sincerely yours,
1. 1/2 1 1 1 Arthur W. Busch
Regional Administrator
E... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 76 | marker | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION VI 1600 PATTERSON, SUITE 1100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT
The Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport will provide an initial three-runway airfield layout ca... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 77 | marker | enter airport property and probably be concentrated in cargo areas, noise levels from trucks should be accounted for. Separation of roadways for passenger and cargo traffic should be considered, especially near the terminals.
3.07 GROUND TRANSPORTATION ENGINE EMISSIONS
The tables of estimated vehicle emissions appear t... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 78 | marker | It is probable that the activities at these institutions would suffer much noise interruption from aircraft operations when the airport reaches the operational stage expected. The statement gives no indication whether officials of these activities have been informed of the impending noise exposure at their sites. The l... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 79 | marker | We suggest that a method for disposal of all solid waste be developed with a discussion of its impact on the environment. All adverse effects on the environment and measures for abatement of the adverse impacts to acceptable levels should be described.
Construction already underway will produce large quantities of cons... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 80 | marker | Methods of handling and applying herbicides and pesticides during future operation and maintenance activities should be discussed in the statement.
Clearing and disposing of the brush, vegetation, and residential and commercial buildings along the right-of-way of the proposed project should include provisions for preve... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 81 | marker | DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
REGIONAL OFFICE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 Lecember 21, 1971
OFFICE THE REGIONAL
Our Reference: EI# 1271-061
Mr. Bill J. Howard, Chief Airport Division, SW-600 Department of Transportation FAA - Southwest Region P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Re: Traft Environmental Impact ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 82 | marker | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
REGION $1X
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
819 Taylor Street
January 6, 197 IN REPLY REFER TO 06-0
Mr. Bill J. Howard, Chief Airports Division, SW-600 Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
The dra... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 83 | marker | DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 819 TAYLOR STREET, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
February 17, 1972
REGION VI
IN REPL
Mr. Bill J. Howard, Chief Airports Division Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
This is to inform y... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 84 | marker | HUD-96 (4-70) PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED
Memorandum
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
TO : Richard L. Morgan, RA, FWRO
DATE: FEB 1 0 1972
Attn : Otis Trimble
IN REPLY REFER TO: 6.1PP
FROM : Manuel Sanchez, Dallas Area Office
SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Dallas - Fort Worth Airpor... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 85 | marker | CONCLUSION:
Through a massive coordination effort of all affected groups and/or units of governments within the airport impact area all adverse effects of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport are being minimized. Through the proper use of information on noise, land use, zoning, transportation, drainage, regional hydr... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 86 | marker | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
P. O. Box 648
Temple, Texas 76501
January 4, 1972
Mr. Bill J. Howard
Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Region
P. O. Box 1689
Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
We have completed our review of the Draft Environme... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 87 | marker | DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 17300
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
SWFED-P 30 December 1971
Mr. Bill J. Howard Chief, Airports Division, SW-600 Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
The ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 88 | marker | SWFED-P Mr. Bill J. Howard
c. The first paragraph on page 113 states that storm drainage from the aprons and taxiways would be processed to remove the petrochemical and non-biodegradable wastes. This implies all runoff, but in fact is the system not designed for some relatively frequent storm such as a 5-10 year storm?... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 89 | marker | UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
DATE: FEB 1 1 1972
In reply refer to: TEU-12
SUBJECT:
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
the Dallas-Ft. Worth Regional Airport
FROM :
Assistant Secretary for Environment
and Urban Systems
TO
Robert F. Bacon, Chief, System Pla... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 90 | marker | FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION REGIONAL OFFICE
819 Taylor Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 December 20, 1971
In reply reter PWR-FW
Mr. Bill J. Howard, Chief Airports Division, SW-600 Dept. of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
This refers to y... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 91 | marker | COMMISSION
DEWITT C. GREER, CHAIRMAN HERBERT C. PETRY, JR. CHARLES E. SIMONS
TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
December 29, 1971
J. C. DINGWALL
IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. D-5
Dallas-Tarrant Counties
Draft of Environmental Impact Statement Dated
November 1971 for the Ultimate Master Plan Configuration
of the ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 92 | marker | It is our understanding that for all runways except two, the approach - departure slope will be 100:1 for the first 15,000' and 40:1 for the next 35,000'. Approach - departure slopes for the two other runways will be 50:1 for 10,000' and 40:1 for 40,000' as provided in Part 77 FAA Regulations. Based on these projected ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 93 | marker | EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711
PRESTON SMITH
February 10, 1972
Mr. Bill J. Howard Chief, Airports Division Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration P. O. Box 1689 Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Dear Mr. Howard:
The Division of Planning Coordination, Office of the Governor (the State Planning and Development ... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 94 | marker | Mr. Bill J. Howard February 10, 1972 Page Two
Encl. (3)
cc: Mr. Thomas M. Sullivan
Exec. Dir., Dallas/Fort Worth
Regional Airport Board (w/encls.)
Mr. William J. Pitstick Exec. Dir., NCTCOG
Hon. Raymond Noah President, NCTCOG | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 95 | marker | TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD
1100 WEST 49th STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS - 78756
CHARLES R. BARDEN, P. E. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
HERBERT C. McKEE, PhD., P.E. Chairman
HERBERT W. WHITNEY, P.E.
Vice-Chairman
RECEIMED
WENDELL H. HAMRICK, M.D.
HENRY J. LeBLANC SR.
CLINTON H. HOWARD
JAMES D. ABRAMS
FRED HARTMAN
WILLIE L. ULICH, Ph.D.,P.E.
... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 96 | marker | REVIEW PARTICIPANT RESPONSE FORM
DEC 29 1971
REVIEWING AGENCY:
Div. of Plan. Coord.
Name Texas Air Control Board
Person(s) conducting review Vick Newsom
GRANT APPLICANT: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
Name: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport
DOCUMENT NUMBER: Not A-95
COMMENT... | |
P0491_35556036527018 | 97 | marker | REVIEW PARTICIPANT RESPONSE FORM
0. C 20 1971
REVIEWING AGENCY:
i V. of Plan Coord.
Name Texas Air Control Board
Person(s) conducting review Vick Newsom
GRANT APPLICANT: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional .
Draft Environmental Impact State
Name: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airpo
ment for
DOCUMENT NUMBER: Not A-95
COMMENTS and ... |
EIS-Text250: 1970s U.S. Environmental Impact Statements (text-only)
Per-page OCR/extraction text for 250 scanned 1970s U.S. federal
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) from the Northwestern University
Library collection — the text-only companion to
Windsao/eis-subset50
(which carries full page images for a 50-doc subset). Built to test how current
models handle long, dense, historical government text: mean ~300 pages/doc,
1970s typewriter prose, OCR noise from degraded microfilm.
Files
text.jsonl— one row per page, all 250 documents:
{
"doc": "p1274_35556039648936",
"page": 12,
"model": "marker", // extraction pipeline: "marker" or "chandra"
"text": "...page text...",
"image_url": "https://nu-impulse-production.s3.amazonaws.com/..."
}
docs.txt— 250 rows, tab-separated:doc_id models pages group(group=subset50if the doc is also in the image subset, elsetext-only).
No images are included; image_url points to the publicly readable full-page
scan (~2400×3200 JPG) on S3 if you need pixels for a specific page. For 50 of
these documents, all page images are packaged in Windsao/eis-subset50.
Selection
250 of the 277 documents with high-quality text extraction in the corpus
(marker or chandra pipelines): all 50 docs of eis-subset50, plus the 200
largest remaining docs by page count (the 27 shortest were dropped).
markerpages: text flattened from marker's block tree (HTML stripped).chandrapages: raw markdown including model-generated figure alt-text.- Pages covered by both pipelines use chandra.
Known issues / gotchas
- Page 1 of many documents is a microfilm resolution test chart, not content.
- A small fraction of pages are legitimately empty (blank microfilm frames).
- OCR quality varies with scan degradation; text may contain OCR errors — treat as noisy ground truth.
markeremits no figure descriptions; onlychandradocs describe figures.
Provenance & licensing
- Source documents: U.S. federal government EIS filings (1970s) — works of the U.S. federal government are in the public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).
- Scans: Northwestern University Library digitization (Impulse pipeline).
- OCR/extraction: marker and chandra pipelines over the scans.
- Compiled by Shang Wu (Northwestern) for research on long-document understanding. Please cite this dataset page if you use it.
- Downloads last month
- 15