Company: CGCT
Filing Date: 2025-03-05
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001104659-25-020969
Chunk: 134

Company: Cartesian Growth Corp III
Filing Date: 2025-03-05
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 134
---
 or the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction
shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and
that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities
Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would
enforce this provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought
to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If it is conclusively determined
that the exclusive forum provision applies to claims under the Securities Act, we will notify investors of such update in future SEC
filings (which notification will include, clarification that the exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims under the Exchange
Act).

<div align='center'>73</div>

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions
of the warrant agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other
claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the
forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions of the
warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall
be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York
in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having
service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in
the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder. This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring
a claim in a judicial