Company: HURA
Filing Date: 2025-02-07
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001193125-25-022803
Chunk: 271

Company: TuHURA Biosciences, Inc./NV
Filing Date: 2025-02-07
Form: S-4
Chunk 271
---
eta’s product candidates or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, Kineta may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of its rights in such intellectual property. If Kineta fails in**

<div align='center'>160</div>

**defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, Kineta may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on Kineta’s business. Even if Kineta is successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Kineta’s licensors may have relied on third-party consultants or collaborators or on funds from third parties, such as the U.S. government, such that Kineta’s licensors are not the sole and exclusive owners of the patents Kineta may in-license in the future. If other third parties have ownership rights or other rights to Kineta’s in-licensed patents, they may be able to license such patents to Kineta’s competitors, and Kineta’s competitors could market competing products and technology. This could have a material adverse effect on Kineta’s competitive position, business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, while it is Kineta’s policy to require its employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to Kineta, Kineta may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that Kineta regards as its own. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing, or the assignment agreements may be breached, and Kineta may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against Kineta, to determine the ownership of what Kineta regards as its intellectual property. Such claims could have a material adverse effect on Kineta’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If Kineta’s trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then Kineta may not be able to build name recognition in Kineta’s markets of interest and its business may be adversely affected.

Kineta’s current or future trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or descriptive or determined to be infringing on other marks. Kineta may not be able to