Company: LAWIL
Filing Date: 2025-08-06
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0000750004-25-000048
Chunk: 112

Company: Light & Wonder, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-08-06
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 8
Chunk 112
---
 to stay the matter, and the American Arbitration Association 

29

closed the case as settled on December 9, 2024. The parties signed a written settlement agreement on January 6, 2025, which is subject to court approval. Andrea Sornberger MatterOn March 8, 2023, plaintiff Andrea Sornberger filed a complaint against SciPlay Corporation and SciPlay Games, LLC in the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama. The complaint asserts claims for alleged violations of Alabama’s anti-gambling statutes and seeks unspecified money damages, including recovery of monies allegedly lost by Alabama players of SciPlay’s online social casino games other than the plaintiff, the award of interests and costs, and injunctive and other relief. On April 12, 2023, defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. On August 24, 2023, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her complaint without prejudice, and re-filed it in the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama. On September 27, 2023, defendants removed the re-filed action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. On October 26, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama. On September 30, 2024, the parties entered into a written term sheet to resolve the matter, subject to the execution of a written settlement agreement and judicial approval of the settlement terms. On October 8, 2024, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to stay the case and stayed the case until October 29, 2024. On November 12, 2024, the parties jointly stipulated to dismiss the case without prejudice to time-related defenses, should the settlement agreement between the parties not become final. The parties signed a written settlement agreement on January 6, 2025, which is still subject to court approval. On March 25, 2025, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice, provided, however, that if the terms of the settlement were not fully consummated within 45 days of the order, then the Court would entertain a petition to reinstate the action. On March 28, 2025, plaintiff filed an unopposed motion to vacate the dismissal with prejudice and asked the Court to enter a dismissal order consistent with the parties’ agreed-upon stipulation of dismissal; the Court has not ruled on the plaintiff’s motion