Company: FGMCU
Filing Date: 2025-09-18
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001104659-25-091249
Chunk: 159

Company: FG Merger II Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-09-18
Form: S-4
Chunk 159
---
 joint proxy statement/prospectus, FGMC does not believe there will be any changes or waivers that FGMC’s directors and executive officers would be likely to make after stockholder approval of the Business Combination Proposal has been obtained. While certain changes could be made without further stockholder approval, FGMC will circulate a new or amended joint proxy statement/prospectus and resolicit FGMC’s stockholders if changes to the terms of the transaction that would have a material impact on its stockholders are required prior to the vote on the Business Combination Proposal.

We and BOXABL will incur significant transaction and transition costs in connection with the Business Combination.

We and BOXABL have both incurred and expect to incur significant, nonrecurring costs in connection with consummating the Business Combination and operating as a public company following the consummation of the Business Combination. We and BOXABL may also incur additional costs to retain key employees. Certain transaction expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement (including the Business Combination), including legal, accounting, consulting, investment banking and other fees, expenses and costs, will be paid out of the proceeds of the Business Combination or by the Combined Company following the Closing. However, if the Closing does not occur, each party to the Merger Agreement will be responsible for and pay its own expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby. See “FGMC Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The Business Combination Proposal-The Merger Agreement-Fees and Expenses.”

The process of taking a company public by means of a business combination with a special purpose acquisition company is different from that of taking a company public through an underwritten offering and may create risks for our unaffiliated investors.

An underwritten offering involves a company engaging underwriters to purchase its shares and resell them to the public. An underwritten offering imposes statutory liability on the underwriters for material misstatements or omissions contained in the registration statement unless they are able to sustain the burden of proving that they did not know and could not reasonably have discovered such material misstatements or omissions. This is referred to as a “due diligence” defense and results in the underwriters undertaking a detailed review of the company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Going public by means of a business combination with a special purpose acquisition company does not involve any underwriters and as a result does not

<div align='center'>69</div>

necessarily involve the level of third-party review attendant to underwriters seeking to establish a “due diligence” defense