Company: NDRA
Filing Date: 2025-10-30
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-103705
Chunk: 30

Company: ENDRA Life Sciences Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-10-30
Form: 424B5
Chunk 30
---
, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target and
we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. Further, there has been an increase in such activities due to the increase
in work-from-home arrangements. The risk of cyberattacks could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine,
Israel-Hamas and Israel-Iran conflicts, or other future conflicts, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated
to such conflicts. Any future breach of our operations or those of others in the cryptocurrency industry, including third-party services
on which we rely, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We face significant risks relating to disruptions, forks, 51% attacks, hacks, network disruptions, or other adverse events or other compromises to the cryptocurrency blockchains, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Blockchain networks are maintained by decentralized
networks of participants, and as such are susceptible and vulnerable to a variety of risks, including disruptions, security breaches,
and fundamental technical issues. Both networks are vulnerable to attacks by malicious actors who gain control of a significant portion
of the network’s mining hash rate, a scenario commonly referred to as a 51% attack. In such an event, the attacker could double-spend
transactions, reverse previously confirmed transactions, or otherwise disrupt the normal operations of the network. Successful 51% attacks
have historically undermined trust in affected blockchain networks and could materially decrease the value of cryptocurrency assets.

<div align='center'>S-17</div>

Additionally, forks, or splits in the underlying
protocol, may occur when participants fail to reach consensus on proposed upgrades or changes. Forks can lead to the creation of duplicate
networks, confusion among market participants, dilution of the original network’s value, and disruption of the network’s operations.
Hard forks, in particular, can materially and adversely impact the perceived stability and value of digital assets, leading to reduced
demand and price declines.

Further, hacks and other security breaches targeting
the core infrastructure of blockchain networks or major participants, such as exchanges and custodians, could severely impact the reputation
and market confidence in these networks. Exploits of protocol-level vulnerabilities could also compromise the integrity of the cryptocurrency
blockchains, resulting in a substantial loss of value.

The success and growth of cryptocurrency assets
depend significantly on their continued security, stability, and scalability. Any technical failures, consensus breakdowns, governance
disputes,