Company: MFON
Filing Date: 2025-08-01
Form Type: PRE 14A
Source: 0001140361-25-028385
Chunk: 26

Company: MOBIVITY HOLDINGS CORP.
Filing Date: 2025-08-01
Form: PRE 14A
Chunk 26
---
 Split and, in lieu of receiving the Cash Payment approved by the Special Committee pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split, obtain payment of the fair value (as defined in NRS 92A.320) of the fractional share that would otherwise result from the Reverse Stock Split of such Cashed Out Stockholder’s pre-split shares, but only if the Cashed Out Stockholder complies with all applicable requirements under NRS 92A.300 through NRS 92A.500, inclusive (the “ Dissenter’s Rights Statutes”), which are summarized in this proxy statement and reproduced in their entirety in Annex A to this proxy statement, and include delivering to the Company, before the vote on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal is taken at the Special Meeting:

| • | written notice of the Cashed Out Stockholder’s intent to demand payment for such resulting fractional share if the Reverse Stock Split is effectuated (referred to as a “statement of intent” as defined in NRS 92A.323), and |

| • | if the Cashed Out Stockholder holds their shares in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, or is otherwise not the “stockholder of record” (as defined in NRS 92A.330) of such shares, the written consent of the broker or other stockholder of record of such shares to the dissent by such Cashed Out Stockholder. |

If the Company and a Cashed Out Stockholder who remains entitled to and properly asserts dissenter’s rights cannot agree as to the fair value within the time period prescribed under the Dissenter’s Rights Statutes, the Company must then commence a proceeding in Nevada state district court to determine the fair value, which may be more than, equal to, or less than the Cash Payment authorized by the Special Committee to be paid pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split. Pursuant to NRS 92A.380(2) (as amended by Assembly Bill No. 239), any stockholder who is entitled to dissent with respect to the Reverse Stock Split pursuant to the Dissenter’s Rights Statutes must not otherwise object to or challenge the Reverse Stock Split, except to the extent that (i) the Company did not obtain the vote of the requisite voting power of the stockholders to approve the Reverse Stock Split as prescribed under the NRS and the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws, or (ii) the Reverse Stock Split is the proximate result of actual fraud against the stockholder or the Company. A copy of the full