Company: SREA
Filing Date: 2025-02-25
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001032208-25-000012
Chunk: 226

Company: SEMPRA
Filing Date: 2025-02-25
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1
Chunk 226
---
 and/or prospects.

LNG Projects

In addition to the risks described above that are applicable to all our energy infrastructure projects, our LNG projects, which we discuss in “Part II – Item 7. MD&A – Capital Resources and Liquidity – Sempra Infrastructure,” also face distinct disadvantages relative to some LNG projects being pursued by other project developers, including:

▪The proposed Cameron LNG Phase 2 project is subject to certain restrictions and conditions under the JV project financing agreements for the Cameron LNG Phase 1 facility and requires unanimous consent of all the members, including with respect to the equity investment obligation of each member. We may not be able to satisfy the conditions under the financing agreements, receive members’ consent, obtain satisfactory conclusion on the EPC process, or obtain the extension of our non-FTA approval, in which case our ability to develop the Cameron LNG Phase 2 project would be jeopardized.

▪The ECA LNG projects under construction and in development are subject to ongoing land and permit disputes and recent and proposed changes to the Mexican Constitution and certain laws in Mexico that could obstruct efforts to find or maintain suitable partners, customers and financing arrangements and hinder or halt construction and, if the projects are completed, operations. We discuss these risks under “Risks Related to Sempra Infrastructure – Legal and Regulatory Risks.” In addition, the Mexican regulatory process and overlay of U.S. regulation for natural gas exports to LNG facilities in Mexico are not well developed, which, among other factors, contributed to delays in obtaining a necessary permit from the Mexican government for the ECA LNG Phase 1 project and could cause similar delays or other hurdles in the future and lead to difficulties finding or maintaining suitable partners, customers and financing arrangements. Further, while we do not expect the construction or operation of the ECA LNG Phase 1 project to disrupt operations at the ECA Regas Facility, we expect construction of the proposed ECA LNG Phase 2 project would conflict with the current operations at the ECA Regas Facility, which currently has firm storage service agreements and nitrogen injection service agreements with Shell and SEFE that expire in May 2028 and December 2025, respectively. In addition, the Baja California region does not have extensive sources of natural gas, and at times, particularly during the summer, natural gas supply to the region is severely constrained and may impact our costs and our ability to source all feed gas required under our ECA LNG Phase 1 supply contracts. 

▪The PA LNG Phase 1 project under construction is located at