Company: YIBO
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form Type: F-3
Source: 0001213900-25-050771
Chunk: 52

Company: Planet Image International Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form: F-3
Chunk 52
---
 and directors.

<div align='center'>26</div>

We have appointed Yan Tang located at 12000 Magnolia
Ave, Suite 101, Riverside, CA 92503 as our agent upon whom process may be served in any action brought against us under the securities
laws of the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman, our counsel as to
Cayman Islands law, has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts in the Cayman Islands would (i) recognize or enforce
judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States or (ii) entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands
against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman has informed us that
although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States
(and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments with the United
States), the courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in
the federal or state courts of the United States against the Company under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money
payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes, or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain
circumstances, an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (a) such courts
had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of
the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public
policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment
by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
However, there is uncertainty with regard to Cayman Islands law on whether judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the
civil liability provisions