Company: EVLVW
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001805385-25-000017
Chunk: 435

Company: Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 2
Chunk 435
---
 the safe and ethical deployment of AI. The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems based on their level of risk, prohibiting certain uses of AI (which provisions applied as of February 2, 2025), and introduces strict requirements for high-risk AI applications (which provisions apply from August 2, 2027). It is intended to apply to companies that develop, use and/or provide AI in the EU and includes requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security and accuracy and introduces significant fines for noncompliance. There are also specific rules on the use of automated decision making under the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) that provide the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her. Additionally, the existence of automated decision making must be disclosed to the data subject with a meaningful explanation of the logic used in such decision making in certain circumstances and safeguards must be implemented to safeguard individual rights, including the right to obtain human intervention and to contest any decision. We will likely incur additional expenses and costs associated with complying with existing and evolving laws, as well as face heightened potential liability if we are unable to comply with such laws. While we strive to minimize any physical bias in our product’s identification of threats because our product’s AI does not process or analyze an individual’s physical characteristics, we may not be able to identify such issues in advance, or if identified, we may not be able to identify mechanisms for effectively mitigating such issues.

Our failure, or perceived failure, to comply fully with developing interpretations of AI laws and regulations or meet evolving and varied stakeholder expectations and industry standards, could harm our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operation. See – “We are subject to government regulation and other legal obligations, particularly related to privacy, data protection, information security, and product marketing and our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our business.”

Further, our ability to continue to develop or use such technologies may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure, such as processing hardware or third-party AI models, and we cannot control the availability or pricing of such third party software and infrastructure, especially in a highly competitive environment. In addition, market acceptance and consumer perceptions of AI and machine learning technologies are uncertain.

A number of aspects of intellectual property protection in the field of AI and machine learning are currently under development, and there is uncertainty and ongoing litigation