Company: AGIO
Filing Date: 2025-05-01
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001439222-25-000036
Chunk: 37

Company: AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-05-01
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part II, Item 1A
Chunk 37
---
 these relationships to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of one or more of our product candidates.

Further, the process of obtaining marketing approvals, both in the United States and abroad, is expensive, may take many years if additional clinical trials are required, if approval is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. 

In addition, we could be adversely affected by several significant administrative law cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024, including most notably, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overruled the Supreme Court's previous ruling that courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations of statutes that are silent or ambiguous on a particular topic. The ruling requires courts to exercise their independent judgment when deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, and that courts may not defer to an agency interpretation solely because a statute is ambiguous. This decision and other administrative law cases may result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal regulatory 

46

agencies, including the FDA and CMS, that we have relied on and intend to rely on in the future. Any such challenges, if successful, could have a material impact on our business. In addition to potential changes to regulations and agency guidance as a result of legal challenges, these decisions may result in increased regulatory uncertainty and delays in and other impacts to the agency rulemaking process, any of which could adversely impact our business and operations.

Additionally, our ability to develop and market new drug products may be impacted based on current or future litigation in the federal court system challenging the FDA’s approval of other companies' drugs. Depending on the outcome of this type of litigation, our ability to develop new drug product candidates and