Company: RDPTF
Filing Date: 2025-09-18
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001213900-25-088699
Chunk: 39

Company: Radiopharm Theranostics Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-09-18
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 39
---
 a result, it may be impracticable to serve process on such persons in
the United States or to enforce judgments obtained in U. S. courts against them based on civil liability provisions of the securities laws
of the United States. Even if you are successful in bringing such an action, there is doubt as to whether Australian courts would enforce
certain civil liabilities under U. S. securities laws in original actions or judgments of U. S. courts based upon these civil liability
provisions. In addition, awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be unenforceable in Australia
or elsewhere outside the United States. An award for monetary damages under U. S. securities laws would be considered punitive if it does
not seek to compensate the claimant for loss or damage suffered and is intended to punish the defendant.

The enforceability of any
judgment in Australia will depend on the particular facts of the case as well as the laws and treaties in effect at the time. As a result,
our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against us, our management or our directors than
would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States.

Our quorum requirements to vote at a shareholders
meeting and our voting procedures may not protect our shareholders’ interests.

Our Constitution provides
that the quorum requirement for a shareholders meeting is two shareholders. In addition, our Constitution provides that voting at a shareholders
meeting can be made on a show of hands. As a result, all our shareholders might be bound by a vote on a show of hands by only two shareholders.
In this case, our Constitution may be unable to effectively protect the interests of our shareholders. In addition, neither the Corporations
Act nor the ASX listing rules provide for any protection mechanism against binding decisions made at a shareholders meeting by only two
shareholders on a show of hands.

In a show of hands
voting at a shareholders meeting, votes can be cast by proxies, where one proxy appointed by a shareholder counts as one vote.
However, the provisions of our Constitution may prevent proxies from being counted. Specifically, if a shareholder has appointed two
persons as proxies to vote on its behalf, neither proxy may vote on a show of hands. In addition, if the person appointed as proxy
has two or more appointments that specify different ways to vote on a resolution, the proxy must not vote on a show of hands. Our
Constitution may also prevent a proxy to vote if the proxy