Company: PAM
Filing Date: 2025-04-16
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001292814-25-001504
Chunk: 61

Company: Pampa Energy Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-16
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 8
Chunk 61
---
 (for up to the amount of the price paid by Pampa for the acquisition 
        of control over Petrobras Argentina S.A.). The plaintiff appealed the Arbitration Court’s decision declaring the dismissal of the    
    main claim upon the failure to pay the arbitration fee. The Court of Appeals in Commercial Matters upheld the filed extraordinary appeal.
      On its part, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. filed an appearance, requesting that a lack of substance of the filed appeal should be declared, 
                                     and, in the alternative, answering such appeal. The Company was notified                                
     that the Court of Appeals in Commercial Matters had upheld the appeal and filed a motion in this regard. Subsequently, the CSJN declared
     the nullity of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Commercial Matters that granted the extraordinary appeal and sent the proceedings
     back for a new decision. The Court of Appeals in Commercial Matter rejected the extraordinary federal appeal filed by the aforementioned
                    Association. The Association filed a motion of dismissal of appeal before the CSJN, which is studying it.                
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

144
---

Table of Contents
-----------------
  Administrative claims 
 

-                                                 CTLL (currently Pampa) filed an administrative                                              
      litigation complaint against the Federal Government for contractual breach during the January 2016-July 2016 period. CTLL claims that   
        CAMMESA’s decision regarding the renewal and recognition of costs associated with natural gas supply agreements should be reversed    
    and that, alternatively, sustained damages should be redressed. Subsequently, CTLL filed a new administrative litigation complaint against
       the Federal Government for contractual breach during the April 2016-October 2018 period. Both cases are currently pending judgment.    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-                                               Upon the determination of the expiration of the                                            
            Veta Escondida block concession granted by the Province of Neuquén, the Company filed a writ of amparo and, as secondary       
    petition, a declaratory judgment action to achieve certainty under the original jurisdiction of the CSJN pursuant to section 322 of the
     Federal Code of Civil and Commercial Procedure. The Company requested judgment and the CSJN set a preliminary hearing, which was held.
             Following the opinion issued by the Attorney General’s Office, the case is currently pending judgment before the CSJN.        
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-                                               On March 31, 2021, the Company brought a Preliminary                                            
         Administrative Claim before Argentina’s Ministry of Economy seeking the