Company: TDBCP
Filing Date: 2025-04-02
Form Type: 424B2
Source: 0001140361-25-011791
Chunk: 38

Company: TORONTO DOMINION BANK
Filing Date: 2025-04-02
Form: 424B2
Chunk 38
---
 
 Act 2018 (the “EUWA”); or (ii) a customer within the meaning of the provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) and any rules or regulations made under the FSMA to implement Directive (EU) 2016/97, where that customer 
 would not qualify as a professional client, as defined in point (8) of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 as it forms part of domestic law by virtue of the EUWA. Consequently no key information document required by Regulation (EU) No   
 1286/2014 as it forms part of domestic law by virtue of the EUWA (the “UK PRIIPs Regulation”) for offering or selling the securities or otherwise making them available to retail investors in the UK has been prepared and therefore offering or    
 selling the securities or otherwise making them available to any retail investor in the UK may be unlawful under the UK PRIIPs Regulation.                                                                                                           |
| Validity of the securities:    | In the opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, as special products counsel to TD, when the securities offered by this pricing supplement have been executed and issued by TD                                                        
 and authenticated by the trustee pursuant to the indenture and delivered, paid for and sold as contemplated herein, the securities will be valid and binding obligations of TD, enforceable against TD in accordance with their terms, subject to    
 applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium, receivership or other laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally, and to general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is     
 sought in a proceeding at law or in equity). This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York. Insofar as this opinion involves matters governed by Canadian law, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &     
 Jacobson LLP has assumed, without independent inquiry or investigation, the validity of the matters opined on by McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Canadian legal counsel for TD, in its opinion expressed below. In addition, this opinion is subject to       
 customary assumptions about the trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and, with respect to the securities, authentication of the securities and the genuineness of signatures and certain factual matters, all as stated  
 in the opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP filed as