Company: GVH
Filing Date: 2025-06-10
Form Type: F-1/A
Source: 0001213900-25-052766
Chunk: 54

Company: Globavend Holdings Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-06-10
Form: F-1/A
Chunk 54
---
 officers and the experts named in this prospectus
reside outside the United States, and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult
or impossible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these individuals or to bring an action against
us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the
U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman
Islands, Hong Kong, or other relevant jurisdictions may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets
of our directors and officers.

Our counsel as to the laws
of the Cayman Islands has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands would (i) recognize
or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions
of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States, or (ii) entertain original actions brought
in the Cayman Islands against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state
in the United States.

Our counsel as to the laws
of the Cayman Islands has also informed us that the courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment a final and conclusive
judgment in personam obtained in the foreign courts against our Company under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum
of money payable in respect to multiple damages, taxes, or other charges of a like nature or in respect to a fine or other penalty) or,
in certain circumstances, an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that
(i) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment, (ii) such courts did not contravene the rules
of natural justice of the Cayman Islands, (iii) such judgment was not obtained by fraud, (iv) the enforcement of the judgment
would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands, (v) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted
prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands, and (vi) there is due compliance with the correct procedures
under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

<div align='center'>19</