Company: RAIN
Filing Date: 2025-02-12
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-012904
Chunk: 55

Company: Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-12
Form: 424B3
Chunk 55
---
 attention. RET’s platform may not be able to withstand any third-party claims against its use. In addition, many companies
have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that
may be brought against them. In a patent infringement claim against RET, RET may assert, as a defense, that we do not infringe the relevant
patent claims, that the patent is invalid or both. RET does not have a large patent portfolio which it could use in counter-claims as
part of a defense against infringement. The strength of RET’s defenses will depend on the patents asserted, the interpretation of
these patents, and its ability to invalidate the asserted patents. However, RET could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or
invalidity arguments in its defense. In the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the
validity of a patent claim must present clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the
patent owner need only prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof. If a third party is able
to obtain an injunction preventing us from accessing such third-party intellectual property rights, or if RET cannot modify its technology
to make it non-infringing, or license or develop alternative technology for any infringing aspect of our business, it may be forced to
limit or stop sales of its products or cease business activities related to such intellectual property. RET cannot predict the outcome
of lawsuits and cannot ensure that the results of any such actions will not have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition
or results of operations. Any intellectual property litigation to which RET might become a party, or for which it is required to provide
indemnification, regardless of the merit of the claim or its defenses, may require RET to do one or more of the following:

| ● | cease                                                                                         
 selling or using technology that incorporates the intellectual property rights that allegedly 
 infringes, misappropriates or violates the intellectual property of a third party;            |

| ● | make                                                                                
 substantial payments for legal fees, settlement payments or other costs or damages; |

| ● | obtain                                                                                           
 a license, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, to sell or use the relevant 
 technology;                                                                                      |

| ● | redesign                                                                                  
 the allegedly infringing technology to avoid infringement, misappropriation or violation, 
 which could