Company: APO
Filing Date: 2025-05-14
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-119946
Chunk: 64

Company: Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-05-14
Form: 424B3
Chunk 64
---
 clients may choose to withhold their consent or whose consent may not be obtained on favorable terms to Apollo. Bridge also has additional contracts with clients and other business partners that may require it to obtain consents from these
other parties in connection with the mergers, which may also not be obtained on favorable terms or at all. If relationships with clients and other business partners are adversely affected by the mergers, or if Apollo, following the mergers, loses
the benefits of the contracts of Bridge, this could have a negative impact on Apollo’s business and financial performance.

Apollo’s certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for certain legal actions between Apollo and its stockholders, which could limit Apollo stockholders’ ability to obtain a judicial forum viewed by the stockholders as more favorable for disputes with Apollo or Apollo’s directors, officers or employees, and the enforceability of the exclusive forum provision may be subject to uncertainty.

Article XIV of Apollo’s certificate of incorporation provides that, unless Apollo consents in writing to the selection of an alternative
forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for: (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on Apollo’s behalf; (b) any action asserting a
claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of Apollo’s current or former directors, officers, other employees or stockholders to Apollo or its stockholders; (c) any action asserting

37

a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, Apollo’s certificate of incorporation or Apollo’s bylaws or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware; or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, except for, as to each of (a) through (d) above, any claim as to which the Court of Chancery determines that there is an indispensable
party not subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery within ten days following such determination), which is vested in the exclusive
jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, or for which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

The exclusive forum provision also provides that it will not apply to claims arising under the Securities Act, the Exchange