Company: CPMV
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001683168-25-002584
Chunk: 41

Company: Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1
Chunk 41
---
ary duty owed by any director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s
stockholders, (C) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation, its directors, officers or employees or agents arising pursuant
to any provision of the DGCL, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or the Corporation’s bylaws, or (D) any action
asserting a claim against the Corporation, its directors, officers or employees or agents governed by the internal affairs doctrine, except
as to each of (A) through (D) above, for any claim as to which the Court of Chancery determines that there is an indispensable party not
subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the
Court of Chancery within ten days following such determination), which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other
than the Court of Chancery, or over which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction. To the fullest extent permitted
by law, any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed
to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Article XIV.”

The exclusive forum provision in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will not relieve us of our duty to comply with the federal securities laws
and the rules and regulations thereunder, and shareholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and
regulations. This exclusive forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing
for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us or our directors, officers
or other employees. In addition, shareholders who do bring a claim in the state or federal court in the State of Delaware could face additional
litigation costs in pursuing any such claim, particularly if they do not reside in or near Delaware. The state or federal court of the
State of Delaware may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a shareholder would otherwise
choose to bring the action, and such judgments or results may be more favorable to us than to our shareholders. However, the enforceability
of similar exclusive forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation have been challenged in legal proceedings,
and it is possible that a court could find this type of