Company: CPMV
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001683168-25-002584
Chunk: 42

Company: Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1
Chunk 42
---
 provision to be inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of
the specified types of actions or proceedings. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision contained in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we might incur additional costs associated with resolving
such action in other jurisdictions.

 24 

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover
attempt.

The Company’s amended and restated certificate
of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control
or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors.

These provisions include:

    ·
    providing that our directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the voting power of our then outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote generally for the election of directors;

    ·
    providing that any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing in lieu of a meeting of such stockholders, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock with respect to such series, if any; 

    ·
    providing that special meetings of our stockholders may only be called by the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors;

    ·
    providing that our board of directors can be divided into three classes of directors, with each class as nearly equal in number as possible, serving staggered three-year terms, other than directors which may be elected by holders of preferred stock, if any. This system of electing and removing directors may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, because it could have the effect of increasing the length of time necessary to change the composition of a majority of the board of directors. In general, at least two annual meetings of stockholders will be necessary for stockholders to effect a change in a majority of the members of the board of directors;

    ·
    providing that all board vacancies, including newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required by law, be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority