Company: APM
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-118752
Chunk: 55

Company: Aptorum Group Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form: 424B5
Chunk 55
---
) any action asserting a claim against
Combined Company or any of its current or former directors, officers, employees or stockholders arising pursuant to any provision of the
DGCL, the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws; (iv) any claim or cause of action seeking to interpret, apply, enforce or determine
the validity of the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws; (v) any action or proceeding asserting a claim against Combined Company
or any of its current or former directors, officers, employees or stockholders as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction to the Court
of Chancery of the State of Delaware and (vi) any action asserting an “internal corporate claim,” as that term is defined
in Section 115 of the DGCL; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing forum selection provision will not apply to
claims arising under the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

<div align='center'>27</div>

The Proposed Charter
will also provide that, unless Combined Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, the federal district courts of the United States shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting
a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. The Proposed Charter will further provide that any person or entity purchasing or
otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of Combined Company Common Stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions
of the Proposed Charter described above.

The forum selection provisions
in the Proposed Charter may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against the Combined Company’s directors and officers. The
enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal
proceedings and there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provisions. In addition, investors cannot waive compliance
with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If the enforceability of the Combined Company’s forum
selection provisions were to be challenged, it may incur additional costs associated with resolving such challenge. While the Combined
Company currently has no basis to expect any such challenge would be successful, if a court were to find its forum selection provisions
to be inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of these specified types of actions or proceedings, the Combined Company
may incur additional costs associated with having to litigate in other jurisdictions, which could result in a diversion of the time and
resources