Company: FTII
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001493152-25-006997
Chunk: 112

Company: FutureTech II Acquisition Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form: S-4
Chunk 112
---
 declines to accept jurisdiction
(collectively, “Delaware Courts”). The Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation further provides that the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a
cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Current and former stockholders are deemed to have consented to the personal jurisdiction
of the Delaware Courts in connection with any action to enforce that exclusive forum provision and to service of process in any such action.
These exclusive forum provisions will not apply to claims under the Exchange Act, but will apply to other state and federal law claims
including actions arising under the Securities Act, as noted above. Section 22 of the Securities Act, however, created concurrent jurisdiction
for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations
thereunder. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a forum selection provision as written in connection
with claims arising under the Securities Act. To the extent that these provisions of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
limit a current or former stockholder’s ability to select a judicial forum other than the Delaware Courts, they might discourage
the specified legal actions, might cause current or former stockholders to incur additional litigation-related expenses, and might result
in outcomes unfavorable to current or former stockholders. A court might determine that these provisions of the Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation are inapplicable or unenforceable in any particular action, in which case we may incur additional litigation
related expenses in such action, and the action may result in outcomes unfavorable to us, which could have a materially adverse impact
on our reputation, our business operations, and our financial position or results of operations.

One of the combined company’s
directors is a Chinese national and may be deemed to reside in China or Hong Kong. It may be difficult for U.S. investors to enforce any
judgment liabilities against such director or any other of the combined company’s directors or officers who are deemed to reside
in China or Hong Kong.

Following the
completion of the Business Combination, it is expected that Mr. Yuquan Wang will serve as a director of the post-combination company.
As disclosed elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, Mr. Wang is a Chinese national, though he resides in the United States. Accordingly,
in the event that stockholders believe that their rights have