Company: SVREW
Filing Date: 2025-03-21
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001013762-25-001028
Chunk: 25

Company: SaverOne 2014 Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-03-21
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 25
---
 our technologies, or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies
and services, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our technologies and cause us to have to significantly alter our current
business model. These claims could also result in litigation (including litigation against our customers or partners, which could result
in us being obligated to indemnify our customers or partners against such litigation), require us to purchase a costly license or require
us to devote additional research and development resources to change our solutions, any of which could have a negative effect on our
business and operating results. In addition, if the license terms for the open-source code change, we may be forced to re-engineer our
solutions or incur additional costs to find alternative tools.

In
addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open-source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial
software, as open-source licensors generally do not provide warranties, support, indemnity or assurance of title or controls on origin
of the software. Further, some open-source projects have known vulnerabilities and architectural instabilities and are provided on an
“as is” basis. Many of these risks associated with usage of open-source software, such as the lack of warranties or assurances
of title, cannot be eliminated, and could, if not properly addressed, negatively affect the performance of our platform and our business.
In addition, we may be required to absorb these risks in our customer relationships by agreeing to provide warranties, support and indemnification
with respect to such third-party open-source software. While we have established processes intended to alleviate these risks, we cannot
assure that these measures will eliminate or significantly reduce these risks.

We
may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming, and unsuccessful.

Competitors
may infringe our intellectual property. If we were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one
of our new products, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent
litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity
challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, or non-enablement.
Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant
information from the United States Patent and