Company: GMER
Filing Date: 2025-03-31
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001641172-25-001868
Chunk: 18

Company: GOOD GAMING, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-03-31
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 8
Chunk 18
---
 the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers,
directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms we received, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,
we have not complied with such filing requirements applicable to our officers and directors. We plan to follow such filing requirements
in the future.

Director
Independence

We
do not have any independent directors.

Family
Relationships

There
are no family relationships between any of the officers, directors, or consultants.

Conflicts
of Interest

Our
officers and directors are also officers/directors of ViaOne Services and therefore, will devote time to projects that do not involve
us.

Compensation
of Directors

Members
of our Board of Directors are not compensated for their services as directors. The Board has not implemented a plan to award options
to any directors. There are no contractual arrangements with any Board of Directors member. We have no director service contracts. We
do not currently have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance.

Indemnification

Under
our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding,
including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner, he reasonably believed to be in our best interest.
We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in
a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney’s fees.
With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding,
and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted
by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Regarding
indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada
law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

We
are not categorized as a “shell company” as that term is defined