Company: PGZ
Filing Date: 2025-01-03
Form Type: N-CSR
Source: 0001398344-25-000145
Chunk: 31

Company: Principal Real Estate Income Fund
Filing Date: 2025-01-03
Form: N-CSR
Chunk 31
---
the “Board”) of Principal Real Estate Income Fund (the “Fund”), the Board, including those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (the “Independent Trustees”), as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), approved ALPS Advisors, Inc. (the “Adviser”) and Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC, (the “Sub-Adviser”) to serve as the Trust’s investment adviser and sub-adviser, respectively, and approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement between the Adviser and the Trust, and the sub-advisory agreement between Sub-Adviser and the Adviser with respect to the Trust (collectively, the “Advisory Agreements”), upon the terms and conditions set forth therein. In connection with considering the approval of the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Trustees met in executive session with independent counsel, who provided assistance and advice.

Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following portion of the minutes summarizes the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Trustees in the executive session and at the Meeting in determining to renew the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement. The Trustees relied upon the advice of independent legal counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating the Agreements and the weight to be given to each such factor. The Trustees’ conclusions were based on an evaluation of all of the information provided and were not the result of any one factor. Moreover, each Trustee may have afforded different weight to the various factors in reaching conclusions with respect to the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement.

Nature, extent, and quality of services.In examining the nature, extent and quality of the investment advisory services provided by the Adviser, the Trustees considered the qualifications, experience and capability of the Adviser’s management and other personnel and the extent of care and conscientiousness with which the Adviser performs its duties. In this regard, the Trustees considered, among other matters, the process by which the Adviser performs oversight of the Fund, including ongoing due diligence regarding product structure, resources, personnel, technology, performance, compliance and oversight of the Sub-Adviser.

With respect to the nature, extent and quality of the investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Adviser, the Trustees considered the Sub-Adviser’s investment management process it uses in managing the assets of the Fund, including the experience and capability of