Company: IMXI
Filing Date: 2025-11-05
Form Type: DEFM14A
Source: 0001140361-25-040538
Chunk: 83

Company: International Money Express, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-05
Form: DEFM14A
Chunk 83
---
 revised draft of the Party B Merger Agreement, which, among other things, communicated to Party B that an antitrust reverse termination fee remained a non-negotiable deal point.

On August 7, 2025, Mr. Lisy and Party B’s Chief Executive Officer attended a telephonic call to, among other things, discuss Mr. Lisy facilitating Party B’s efforts to obtain financing and Party B’s currently proposed offer. Party B’s Chief Executive Officer indicated to Mr. Lisy that Party B’s proposed merger consideration price of $13.00 per share was its best and final offer. Although Party B’s Chief Executive Officer indicated to Mr. Lisy that Party B’s proposed merger consideration of $13.00 per share was its best and final offer, he did indicate that Party B might consider an unspecified higher offer if the potential transaction with another party faltered.

Also, on August 7, 2025, Mr. Lisy and Mr. McGranahan participated in a telephonic call to discuss timing of signing the Merger Agreement and remaining open items requiring resolution before the Merger Agreement could be executed.

From August 8, 2025 through August 10, 2025, Intermex and Western Union and their respective advisors exchanged electronic communications regarding strategy and timing of joint Merger communications to be publicized following the signing of the Merger Agreement, including exchanging drafts of the joint press release to be issued by Western Union and Intermex.

On August 9, 2025, the Board of Directors held a joint meeting with the Strategic Alternatives Committee and the Compensation Committee of the Board. Intermex management and representatives of FTP, Lazard, H&K and Cravath were also in attendance. Representatives of FTP presented a summary recap of the strategic process and its results and representatives of H&K presented a summary of the current draft of the Merger Agreement and proposed key deal terms. FTP was not requested to, and did not, provide a fairness opinion with respect to the Merger in light of the fact that Lazard had been engaged for that purpose, among others. Representatives of Lazard reviewed the analyses it had conducted in connection with its financial fairness opinion and rendered to the Strategic Alternatives Committee and the Board of Directors its oral opinion, which opinion was subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated August 10, 2025, to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the various

<div align='center'>