Company: HURA
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-125499
Chunk: 720

Company: TuHURA Biosciences, Inc./NV
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form: 424B3
Chunk 720
---
 of the ownership thresholds described above has been satisfied as to the Kineta stockholders
or beneficial owners seeking appraisal, the appraisal proceeding will be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding, the Court of
Chancery will determine the “fair value” of the shares of Kineta Common stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Mergers, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair

488

value (subject, in the case of interest payments, to any voluntary cash payments made by the Surviving Company pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL that have the effect
of limiting the sum on which interest accrues as described below). In determining fair value, the Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the
period between the effective date and the date of payment of the judgment. However, at any time before the Court of Chancery’s entry of judgment in the proceedings, the Surviving Company may pay to each Kineta stockholder and beneficial owner
of Kineta Common Stock entitled to appraisal an amount in cash, which is referred to as a voluntary cash payment, in which case interest will accrue thereafter only upon the sum of (i) the difference, if any, between the amount so paid by the
Surviving Company and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Court of Chancery and (ii) interest theretofore accrued, unless paid at that time.

In determining fair value, the Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Supreme
Court of Delaware discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods that are generally considered acceptable in the financial community
and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Supreme Court of Delaware stated that, in making this
determination