Company: PATH
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001734722-25-000030
Chunk: 36

Company: UiPath, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 1
Chunk 36
---
 complaint.On November 30, 2023, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against UiPath, as nominal defendant, and then Co-CEO Daniel Dines, CFO Ashim Gupta, and several of UiPath’s current and former directors. The case is captioned Polilingua Limited v. Daniel Dines, et al. The lawsuit alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and committed other alleged misconduct in connection with the statements at issue in the 2023 Securities Action and by causing UiPath to repurchase shares at allegedly inflated prices. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and/or restitution on behalf of UiPath, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees and certain changes to UiPath’s corporate governance and internal controls. Similar cases were filed in the District of Delaware (captioned In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation) and in the Southern District of New York (captioned Ristea v. Botteri, et al.). On November 22, 2024, the In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. On January 8, 2025, the Polilingua Limited v. Daniel Dines, et al. case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. On February 5, 2025, the Ristea v. Botteri, et al. case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.On June 20, 2024, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against UiPath, CEO Daniel Dines, former CEO Robert Enslin, and CFO Ashim Gupta. The case was captioned Steiner v. UiPath, et al. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased or acquired UiPath common stock between December 1, 2023 and May 29, 2024, and alleges that defendants made material misstatements and omissions, including regarding the Company's AI-powered Business Automation Platform and the Company's strategy for, the success of, and customer demand for the platform. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys' fees, and other unspecified relief as the Court deems appropriate. On August 6, 2024, a second putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New