Company: G
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001140361-25-041837
Chunk: 22

Company: Genpact LTD
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form: 424B5
Chunk 22
---
 • | the Guarantors did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for the guarantees and/or the Guarantors: (i) became insolvent before the granting of the guarantees or were insolvent or rendered insolvent because of the issuance of the guarantees; (ii) was undercapitalized or became undercapitalized because of the issuance of the guarantees; or (iii) intended to incur, or believed that they would incur, indebtedness beyond their ability to pay at maturity; |

| • | the guarantees were held to exceed the objects of the Guarantors or not to be in the best interests or for the corporate benefit of the Guarantors; |

| • | the guarantees were entered into within a certain time period prior to the opening date of insolvency proceedings of the Guarantors; or |

| • | the amount paid or payable was in excess of the maximum amount permitted under applicable law. |

If a court or a creditor were to find that the granting of either of the guarantees was a fraudulent conveyance or can otherwise be challenged, the court, a creditor or an insolvency administrator appointed over the assets of the Guarantors could void or declare unenforceable the payment obligations under such guarantees, or subordinate such guarantees to any presently existing and future indebtedness of such Guarantor or require the holders of the notes to repay any amounts received with respect to such of the guarantees. In some of these events, an investor may cease to have any claim in respect of the Guarantor and would be a creditor solely of the Issuers and any remaining Guarantors. In the event of bankruptcy, insolvency or a similar event, proceedings could be initiated in any of the foregoing jurisdictions. Moreover, such multijurisdictional proceedings are typically complex and costly for creditors and often result in substantial uncertainty and delay in the enforcement of creditors’ rights. The application of these various laws in multiple jurisdictions could trigger disputes over which jurisdictions’ law should apply and could materially adversely affect the ability to realize any recovery under the notes and the guarantees.

S-18

#### TABLE OF CONTENTS
**U.S. investors in the notes may have difficulties enforcing certain civil liabilities against the Parent Guarantor, the UK Co-Issuer or the Subsidiary Guarantor in the United States.

The UK Co-Issuer is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, the Parent Guarantor is an exempted company organized under the laws of Bermuda and the Subsidiary Guarantor is a private limited liability