Company: RETO
Filing Date: 2025-10-24
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-102262
Chunk: 123

Company: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-10-24
Form: 424B5
Chunk 123
---
 of the issues would be necessary, provided that: •the U.S. court issuing the judgment had jurisdiction in the matter and the company either submitted to such jurisdiction or was resident or carrying on business within such jurisdiction and was duly served with process; •the judgement is final and for a liquidated sum; •in obtaining judgment there was no fraud on the part of the person in whose favor judgment was given or on the part of the court; •recognition or enforcement of the judgment in the British Virgin Islands would not be contrary to public policy; and •the proceedings pursuant to which judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice; and. •the judgment given by the U.S. court was not in respect of penalties, taxes, fines or similar fiscal or revenue obligations of the company (see below). The courts of the British Virgin Islands will not usually have jurisdiction to enforce original actions predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws. Typically, any such action would need to be brought within the jurisdiction of the United States. The British Virgin Islands courts are unlikely: •to recognize or enforce against the Company, judgments of courts of the U.S. predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S.; and •to impose liabilities against the Company, predicated upon the certain civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S. so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. Our constitutional documents do not contain provisions requiring that disputes, including those arising under the securities laws of the United States, between us, our officers, directors and shareholders, be arbitrated. 53 Substantially all of our current operations are conducted in mainland China, and substantially all of our assets are located in mainland China. A majority of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of the PRC and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for a shareholder to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons, or to enforce against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Our PRC counsel, Yuan Tai Law Offices, has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of mainland China would: •recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the