Company: NMZ
Filing Date: 2025-09-29
Form Type: N-14 8C
Source: 0001999371-25-014188
Chunk: 15

Company: NUVEEN MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME OPPORTUNITY FUND
Filing Date: 2025-09-29
Form: N-14 8C
Chunk 15
---
 Municipal only) With respect to the proposal regarding the election of Board Members: |

| ● | With                                                                                   
 respect to election of three (3) Class I Board Members of each of New Jersey Municipal 
 and Pennsylvania Municipal, the affirmative vote of a plurality (the greatest number   
 of affirmative votes) of such Fund’s common and preferred shares, voting together      
 as a single class.                                                                     |

| ● | With                                                                                     
 respect to the election of four (4) Class II Board Members of Missouri Municipal, the    
 affirmative vote of a plurality (the greatest number of affirmative votes) of the Fund’s 
 common and preferred shares, voting together as a single class.                          |

| ● | With                                                                                    
 respect to the election of two (2) Board Members of each Fund by preferred shareholders 
 of such Fund, the affirmative vote of a plurality of such Fund’s                        
 preferred shares, voting separately.                                                    |

Broker-dealer firms holding shares of a Fund in “street name” for the benefit of their customers and clients are generally required to request the instructions of such customers and clients on how to vote their shares before the Fund’s Meeting. The Funds understand that, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), such broker-dealer firms may, for certain “routine” matters vote without instructions from their customers and clients if no instructions have been received prior to the date specified in the broker-dealer firm’s request for voting instructions. Broker non-votes typically occur when both routine and non-routine proposals are being considered at a meeting. Proposal No. 1 and Proposal 2 with respect to the Mergers are considered “non-routine” matters for which, under the rules of the NYSE, uninstructed shares may not be voted by broker-dealers, but Proposal No. 3 with respect to the election of Board Members is considered a “routine” matter, and beneficial owners who do not provide proxy instructions or who do not return a proxy card may have their shares voted by broker-dealer firms on Proposal No. 3 in the discretion of such broker-dealer firms. As a result, because each Target Fund’s common shareholders are being asked to vote on both Proposals No. 1 and Proposal No. 3, there may be broker non-votes received with respect to Proposal No. 1 at each Target Fund’s Meeting. Because Proposal No. 2 is a non-routine matter and the sole proposal at the Acquiring Fund Meeting, it is expected that there will be no broker