Company: IMG
Filing Date: 2025-11-18
Form Type: 10-Q/A
Source: 0001493152-25-024067
Chunk: 29

Company: CIMG Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-18
Form: 10-Q/A
Chunk 29
---
v-7485) (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleges that the Company breached a Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated June 6, 2024, between the Company and Mr. Kim, by, among other things, failing to deliver the registration rights agreement, excluding Mr. Kim from the S1 registration statement, delaying conversion of Mr. Kim’s notes, undertaking steps to dilute Mr. Kim’s shares, failing to honor Mr. Kim’s 50% participation right in any subsequent financing and failing to appoint a designated director, as set forth in the parties’ agreement. Mr. Kim seeks specific performance of the Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, and monetary damages in the amount of $ 1,041,216, plus applicable interest. The Company filed its answer to the Complaint on December 3, 2024. On January 7, 2025, Mr. Kim filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction against the Company (the “Motion”). The Company opposed the Motion on January 22, 2025, and on February 13, 2025, the Court denied Mr. Kim’s Motion. Discovery in the case is ongoing, and no trial date has been set.

The Company believes it has a basis to defend the claims in the Kim Litigation, however, the Company is not able to predict the outcome, and there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in its defense.

Ex-Directors Lawsuit

On March 10, 2025, former directors of the Company, Kevin J. Connor, Chris J. Jones, Nobuki Kurita, and David Robson (collectively, the “Ex-Directors”), filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (Case No. 25CU012922N) (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleges the Company failed to pay directors’ fees and expenses from the last quarter the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 through the first two quarters of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, and is claiming breach of contract, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unfair business practices. The Ex-Directors seek monetary damages in excess of $ 200,000, with applicable interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. The Company’s answer to the Complaint was due on April 16, 2025. On April