Company: HURA
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-125499
Chunk: 263

Company: TuHURA Biosciences, Inc./NV
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form: 424B3
Chunk 263
---
 to compete with Kineta. If any of Kineta’s trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor or
other third party, Kineta’s competitive position would be harmed.

Kineta may become subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of its patents and other intellectual property.

Kineta may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or
other third parties have an interest in Kineta’s patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. The failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the
patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the
development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing Kineta’s product candidates or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential
joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, Kineta may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of its rights in such intellectual
property. If Kineta fails in

161

defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, Kineta may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual
property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on Kineta’s business. Even if Kineta is successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other
employees.

Kineta’s licensors may have relied on third-party consultants or collaborators or on funds from third parties, such as
the U.S. government, such that Kineta’s licensors are not the sole and exclusive owners of the patents Kineta may in-license in the future. If other third parties have ownership rights or other rights to
Kineta’s in-licensed patents, they may be able to license such patents to Kineta’s competitors, and Kineta’s competitors could market competing products and technology. This could have a
material adverse effect on Kineta’s competitive position, business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

In
addition, while it is Kineta’s policy to require its employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to Kineta, Kineta may be
unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party