Company: TACOW
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001829126-25-002650
Chunk: 126

Company: Berto Acquisition Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 126
---
 one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other SPACs.

Each unit contains one-half of
one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units, and only whole units
will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon
exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of ordinary shares to be issued to the warrant holder. This is different
from other offerings similar to ours whose units include one ordinary share and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established
the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a business combination
since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-half of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a whole
warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses. Nevertheless, this
unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if it included a warrant to purchase one whole share.

Our warrant agreement will designate the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.

Our warrant agreement will provide
that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant
agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall
be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that
such courts represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act
or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce
this provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for