Company: CGCT
Filing Date: 2025-04-14
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001104659-25-034635
Chunk: 136

Company: Cartesian Growth Corp III
Filing Date: 2025-04-14
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 136
---
 holder of public warrants if holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding public warrants
approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then-outstanding
public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of
the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or shares, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Class A ordinary shares
purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.

Our warrant agreement will designate the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.

Our warrant agreement will provide that, subject
to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant agreement,
including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction
shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and
that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities
Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would
enforce this provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought
to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If it is conclusively determined
that the exclusive forum provision applies to claims under the Securities Act, we will notify investors of such update in future SEC
filings (which notification will include, clarification that the exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims under the Exchange
Act).

<div align='center'>73</div>

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions
of the warrant agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other
claim for which the federal district