Company: IMXI
Filing Date: 2025-11-05
Form Type: DEFM14A
Source: 0001140361-25-040538
Chunk: 15

Company: International Money Express, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-05
Form: DEFM14A
Chunk 15
---
azard’s engagement, the Strategic Alternatives Committee requested that Lazard evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock (other than Excluded Holders) of the Merger Consideration to be paid to such holders in the Merger. On August 9, 2025, at a joint meeting of the Board of Directors and Strategic Alternatives Committee, Lazard rendered to the Strategic Alternatives Committee and the Board of Directors its oral opinion, which opinion was subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated August 10, 2025, to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to, among other things, the various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection with its opinion, the Merger Consideration to be paid to holders of our common stock (other than Excluded Holders) in the Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

The full text of Lazard’s written opinion, dated August 10, 2025, which describes the various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection with its opinion, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For a summary of Lazard’s opinion and the methodology that Lazard used to render its opinion, please see the section of this proxy statement captioned “ The Merger — Opinion of the Financial Advisor” . The summary of the written opinion of Lazard, dated August 10, 2025, set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Lazard’s written opinion attached as Annex B. You are encouraged to read Lazard’s opinion and the summary contained in this proxy statement carefully and in their entirety.

Lazard’s engagement and its opinion were for the benefit of the Strategic Alternatives Committee and the Board of Directors (in their capacities as such) and Lazard’s opinion was rendered to the Strategic Alternatives Committee and the Board of Directors in connection with their evaluation of the Merger and addressed only the fairness, as of the date of the opinion, from a financial point of view, to holders of our common stock (other than Excluded Holders) of the Merger Consideration to be paid to such holders in the Merger. Lazard’s opinion did not address the relative

<div align='center'>10</