Company: VSA
Filing Date: 2025-05-15
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001410578-25-001300
Chunk: 83

Company: VisionSys AI Inc
Filing Date: 2025-05-15
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 83
---
 adjustments. According to the Circular on Several Issues Regarding the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties, which was issued on February 3, 2018, by the State Administration of Taxation and took effect from April 1, 2018, or Circular 9, when determining the applicant’s status of the “beneficial owner” regarding tax treatments in connection with dividends, interests or royalties in the tax treaties, several factors, including, without limitation, whether the applicant is obligated to pay more than 50% of his or her income in 12 months to residents in a third country or region, whether the business operated by the applicant constitutes the actual business activities, and whether the counterparty country or region to the tax treaties levies any tax or grants a tax exemption on relevant incomes or levies tax at an extremely low rate, will be taken into account, and such determination will be analyzed according to the actual circumstances of the specific cases. Circular 9 further provides that an applicant who intends to prove his or her status as the “beneficial owner” shall submit relevant documents to the tax authority according to the Administrative Measures for Tax Convention Treatment for Non-resident Taxpayers, or Circular 60, which was replaced and repealed by Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Taxpayers to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties, or Circular 35. Circular 35, which was issued in October 2019 by the State Administration of Taxation and became effective on January 1, 2020, sets forth that non-resident enterprises and their withholding agents shall enjoy treaty benefits by means of “self-judgment of eligibility, declaration of entitlement, and retention of relevant materials for future reference.” However, if a competent tax authority finds out that it is necessary to apply the general anti-tax avoidance rules, it may start general investigation procedures for anti-tax avoidance and adopt corresponding measures for subsequent administration. Moreover, according to Circular 81 and Circular 35, if the tax authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the primary purpose of enjoying a preferential tax treatment, the tax authorities may adjust the preferential withholding tax in the future.

49

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct an investigation or collect evidence within China.
Shareholder claims or regulatory investigations that are common in jurisdictions outside mainland China are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in mainland China. For example, in mainland China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside mainland China