Company: DGLY
Filing Date: 2025-03-04
Form Type: DEF 14A
Source: 0001493152-25-008945
Chunk: 17

Company: DIGITAL ALLY, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-03-04
Form: DEF 14A
Chunk 17
---
 market. Many investors likely would not buy or sell our Common Stock due to difficulty in accessing over-the-counter markets, policies preventing them from trading in securities not listed on a national exchange or other reasons. The Board believes that a Reverse Stock Split is a potentially effective means for us to maintain compliance with the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market and to avoid, or at least mitigate, the likely adverse consequences of our Common Stock being delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market by producing the immediate effect of increasing the bid price of our Common Stock

| 8 |

Improve the marketability and liquidity of the Common Stock.If this proposal is approved by the stockholders at the Special Meeting and the Board elects to implement a Reverse Stock Split, we also believe that the increased market price of our Common Stock expected as a result of implementing the Reverse Stock Split will improve the marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock and will encourage interest and trading in our Common Stock. The Reverse Stock Split could allow a broader range of institutions to invest in our Common Stock (namely, funds that are prohibited from buying stocks whose price is below a certain threshold), potentially increasing the liquidity of our Common Stock. The Reverse Stock Split could also help increase analyst and broker interest in our stock as their policies can discourage them from following or recommending companies with low stock prices. Because of the trading volatility often associated with low-priced stocks, many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. Some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Additionally, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current average price per share of our Common Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. It should be noted, however, that the liquidity of our Common Stock may in fact be adversely affected by a Reverse Stock Split given the reduced number of shares of Common Stock that would be outstanding after a Reverse Stock Split.

For the above reasons, we believe that providing the Board with the ability to effect the Reverse Stock Split, in the event that it determines, in its sole discretion, that implementing a Reverse Stock Split will help us regain and/or maintain compliance with the Nasdaq listing requirements or otherwise, as a result,