Company: UZF
Filing Date: 2025-08-11
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0000821130-25-000051
Chunk: 100

Company: ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-08-11
Form: 10-Q
Item: Item 4
Chunk 100
---
holder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division against Array, certain TDS and Array directors and officers, and nominal defendant TDS. The derivative lawsuit took issue with the same public statements made between May 6, 2022 and November 3, 2022, alleging that the fact that the statements were made was a breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the officer and director defendants, and brought claims for indemnification and contribution against the officer and director defendants and Array. In addition to indemnification and contribution, the plaintiff sought money damages and the implementation of certain governance proposals. On May 20, 2025, the parties filed an agreed order dismissing the case with prejudice as to the named plaintiff and otherwise without prejudice, and the order was granted by the court on May 22, 2025.

On January 31, 2025, a second stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division against certain TDS and Array directors and officers, and nominal defendant TDS. The derivative lawsuit makes similar claims as in the derivative lawsuit filed in 2024, and seeks similar relief. On April 1, 2025, the parties in both Cook County derivative suits jointly filed a motion seeking to consolidate the two lawsuits. The court denied the motion for consolidation on May 6, 2025. On July 21, 2025, a motion to intervene in the lawsuit was filed by the stockholder plaintiff who filed a stockholder derivative lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and subsequently dismissed that lawsuit. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on July 23, 2025.

On March 4, 2025, a third stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against certain TDS and Array directors and officers, and nominal defendant TDS. The derivative lawsuit made similar claims as those in the Cook County derivative lawsuits, and in addition alleged claims against the director and officer defendants for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and sought similar relief to the Cook County derivative lawsuits. On June 4, 2025, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit without prejudice and on June 6, 2025, the court dismissed the case without prejudice.

Array is unable at this time to determine whether the outcome of these actions would have