Company: BWAY
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form Type: F-3
Source: 0001171843-25-002378
Chunk: 33

Company: Brainsway Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form: F-3
Chunk 33
---
. Service of process upon us and upon our directors and officers and the Israeli experts named in this prospectus, the majority
of whom reside outside the United States, may be difficult to obtain within the United States. Furthermore, because substantially all
of our assets and the majority of our directors and officers are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United
States against us or any of our directors and officers may not be collectible within the United States.

It may be difficult to assert U.S. securities
law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on a violation of U.S. securities
laws because Israel is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim,
it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content
of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will
also be governed by Israeli law.

Subject to specified time limitations and legal procedures,
Israeli courts may enforce a United States judgment in a civil matter which, subject to certain exceptions, is non-appealable, including
judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and including a monetary or compensatory
judgment in a non-civil matter, provided that, among other things:

| · | the judgments are obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, according to the laws of the state in which the judgment is given and the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel; |

| · | the prevailing law of the foreign state in which the judgments were rendered allows the enforcement of judgments of Israeli courts (however, the Israeli courts may waive this requirement following a request by the attorney general); |

| · | adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to present his or her evidence; |

| · | the judgments are not contrary to Israeli public policy, and the enforcement of the civil liabilities set forth in the judgment does not impair the security or sovereignty of the State of Israel; |

| · | the judgments were not obtained by fraud and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties; |

| · | an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time