Company: COPL-UN
Filing Date: 2025-02-03
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001829126-25-000620
Chunk: 152

Company: Copley Acquisition Corp
Filing Date: 2025-02-03
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 152
---

Our sponsor, our executive officers and our directors are based in Hong Kong and have ties to the PRC. Because of such ties of our sponsor and officers and directors to the PRC, we may be governed by PRC laws and regulations.

There may be difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in the PRC against us based on foreign laws. Our sponsor, our executive officers and our directors are based in Hong Kong. Due to the lack of reciprocity and treaties between the United States and some of these foreign jurisdictions, and cost and time constraints, it may be difficult for a shareholder to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons, or to enforce against the combined company or some of the combined company’s officers and directors judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Even with the proposed service of process, it may also be difficult to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against these officers and directors.

In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC or Hong Kong would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against the officers and directors predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state.

<div align='center'>96</div>

PRC courts may only recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. This is reflected in a number of bilateral treaties signed by China, which provide that lack of jurisdiction of the judgment court can be a ground for refusal to enforce the foreign judgment. Further, a foreign judgment cannot be recognized and enforced in China if a Chinese court has rendered a judgment on the same subject matter or recognized and enforced another foreign judgment or arbitral award on the same subject matter. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security, or public interest. China has no treaties or other forms of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Additionally, the enforcement of judgments obtained in U.S. courts or foreign courts based on the civil