Company: ALAR
Filing Date: 2025-12-15
Form Type: 6-K
Source: 0001213900-25-121674
Chunk: 0

Company: Alarum Technologies Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-12-15
Form: 6-K
Chunk 0
---
<div align='center'>UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of: December 2025

Commission file number: 001-38610

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

8 Yitzhak Sadeh St.

(Address of principal executive offices)</div>

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

<div align='center'>Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐

CONTENTS</div>

Further to the Report of Foreign
Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished by Alarum Technologies Ltd. (the “Registrant”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘SEC”) on July 9, 2025, the Registrant hereby reports that the motion to certify a claim as a class action pending in
Israel has also been dismissed.

As previously reported, on February
16, 2025, the Registrant was served with a motion to certify a claim as a class action (the “Israeli Motion”) filed in the
Economic Department of the District Court in Tel Aviv, Israel (the “Israeli court”) against the Registrant and certain of
its officers. In addition, the Registrant received a complaint of a similar nature filed in the United States District Court for the District
of New Jersey (the “U.S. Complaint”) against the Registrant and certain of its officers.

As disclosed in the Report of
Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K furnished with the SEC on July 9, 2025, the U.S. lead plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the U.S. Complaint.
The Registrant now further reports that the Israeli Motion has also been voluntarily dismissed.

On December 10, 2025, the applicant
in the Israeli Motion submitted a motion, with the consent of the respondents, to voluntarily dismiss the proceedings without costs and
without compensation for the applicant in the Israeli Motion or his attorneys, and to dismiss the personal claim of the applicant with
prejudice. In the motion, the applicant stated that following a thorough examination conducted by the applicant and his attorneys, including
discussions with the plaintiffs and their attorneys in the parallel U.S.