Company: OSRH
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001213900-25-034116
Chunk: 300

Company: OSR Holdings, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1A
Chunk 300
---
 the federal forum provision is found to be unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such matters. The federal forum provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert the provision is not
enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the United States District Courts may also reach different
judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise
choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.

Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction
for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations
thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. As noted above, the Amended Bylaws
provides that the United States District Court will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause
of action arising under the Securities Act. While the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions
purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court were “facially valid” under Delaware law,
there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce the federal forum provision in the Amended Bylaws. Investors also cannot
waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in the Company Charter
and the Company Bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

The Amended Charter and the Amended Bylaws contain provisions that
could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our board of directors that our stockholders might consider favorable.
Some of these provisions include:

●a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called
only by the chairperson of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, or by the directors entitled to cast a majority of the
votes of the whole board of directors;

●advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations
for election to our board of directors; and

●the authority of the board of directors to issue preferred stock
on terms determined by the board of directors without stockholder approval and which preferred stock may include rights superior to the
rights of the holders of common stock.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions in the Company
Charter and the Company