Company: RMIX
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001104659-25-110488
Chunk: 119

Company: Suncrete, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form: S-4
Chunk 119
---
 Results of Operations of Haymaker,” the financial statements of Suncrete and Haymaker and notes to the financial statements included herein, as applicable.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to the “Company,” “Suncrete,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to the business of Suncrete and its subsidiaries prior to the consummation of the Business Combination and to New Suncrete and its subsidiaries following the Business Combination.

### Risks Related to the Business Combination and Haymaker
The Sponsor has agreed to vote in favor of the Business Combination, regardless of how Haymaker’s Public Shareholders vote.

Unlike some other blank check companies in which the Initial Shareholders agree to vote their shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the Public Shareholders in connection with an initial business combination, the Sponsor has agreed to, among other things, vote in favor of the Business Combination Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, in each case, subject to the terms and conditions contemplated by the Sponsor Support Agreement.

Neither the Haymaker board of directors nor any committee thereof obtained a third party valuation in determining whether or not to pursue the Business Combination.

Neither the Haymaker board of directors nor any committee thereof is required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking or valuation or appraisal firm that the price that Haymaker is paying for Suncrete is fair to Haymaker from a financial point of view. Neither the Haymaker board of directors nor any committee thereof obtained a third party valuation in connection with the Business Combination. In analyzing the Business Combination, the Haymaker board of directors and management conducted due diligence on Suncrete. The Haymaker board of directors reviewed comparisons of selected financial data of Suncrete with its peers in the industry and the financial terms set forth in the Business Combination Agreement, and concluded that the Business Combination was in the best interest of its shareholders. Accordingly, investors will be relying solely on the judgment of the Haymaker board of directors and management in valuing Suncrete, and the Haymaker board of directors and management may not have properly valued such business. The lack of a third party valuation may also lead an increased number of shareholders to vote against the Business Combination or demand redemption of their SPAC Class A Common Shares, which could potentially impact Haymaker’s ability to consummate the Business Combination.

Since the Sponsor and Haymaker’s directors and executive officers have interests that are different, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of Haymaker’s shareholders and warrantholders, a conflict of interest may