Company: ARAI
Filing Date: 2025-11-14
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001493152-25-023457
Chunk: 86

Company: Arrive AI Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-14
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 8
Chunk 86
---
 Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment
in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Based
on that evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, as of
September 30, 2025, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective for the period covered by this report.

Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

No
change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) was identified
in the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act during the quarter ended September 30, 2025 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

- 33 -

PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item
1. Legal Proceedings

From
time to time, Arrive AI Inc. (the “Company) may be subject to various claims, lawsuits and other legal and administrative proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business. Defending such proceedings is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and
employees. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation
can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. Other
than as set forth below, Arrive AI is not presently a party to any litigation the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would
in our estimation, have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. The following
is a summary of the Company’s ongoing legal proceedings:

Byfield
Management, Inc. and Ohrn II, Richard B v. Dronedek Corporation. This is an employment action, originally filed in the Hamilton County
Court of the State of Indiana Hamilton Superior Court/File: 5 29 D05-2303-PL-002478. Orhn, working as Byfield Management, Inc., was the
original chief financial officer of the Company under an oral agreement. The amount in dispute includes