Company: FVN
Filing Date: 2025-03-10
Form Type: DRS/A
Source: 0001829126-25-001610
Chunk: 94

Company: Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-03-10
Form: DRS/A
Chunk 94
---
 to prevent the misappropriation of company intellectual property. In the event that VIWO resorts to litigation to enforce intellectual property rights, such litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of VIWO’s managerial and financial resources. VIWO cannot provide assurance that VIWO will prevail in such litigation. Any failure in protecting or enforcing VIWO’s intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

<div align='center'>52</div>

VIWO’s services or solutions could infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others or VIWO might lose its ability to utilize the intellectual property of others.

VIWO
cannot be sure that its services and solutions do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties, and these third
parties could claim that VIWO or its clients are infringing upon their intellectual property rights. These claims could harm VIWO’s
reputation, cause VIWO to incur substantial costs or prevent it from offering some services or solutions in the future. Any related proceedings
could require VIWO to expend significant resources over an extended period of time. Any claims or litigation in this area could be time-consuming
and costly, damage VIWO’s reputation and/or require it to incur additional costs to obtain the right to continue to offer a service
or solution to VIWO’s customers. If VIWO cannot secure this right at all or on reasonable terms, or if it cannot substitute alternative
technology, then VIWO’s results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The risk of infringement claims against VIWO
may increase as VIWO expands upon its Business intelligence digital technology solutions.

Additionally, in recent years, individuals and firms have purchased intellectual property assets in order to assert claims of infringement against technology providers and customers that use such technology. Any such action naming VIWO or its clients could be costly to defend or lead to an expensive settlement or judgment against VIWO. Moreover, such an action could result in an injunction being ordered against VIWO’s client or its services or operations, causing further damages.

In addition, VIWO relies on third-party software in providing some of VIWO’s services and solutions. If VIWO loses its ability to continue using such software for any reason, including in the event that the software is found to infringe the rights of others, VIWO will need to obtain substitute software or seek alternative means of obtaining the technology necessary to continue to provide such services and solutions. VIWO’s inability to replace such software, or to replace such software in a timely or