Company: HBCYF
Filing Date: 2025-10-27
Form Type: 6-K
Source: 0001654954-25-012230
Chunk: 0

Company: HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
Filing Date: 2025-10-27
Form: 6-K
Chunk 0
---
#### FORM 6-K

### SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

#### Washington, D.C. 20549

#### Report of Foreign Private Issuer

#### Pursuant to Rule 13a - 16 or 15d - 16 of

#### the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
<div align='center'>For the month of October</div>

#### HSBC Holdings plc
<div align='center'>42nd Floor, 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, England

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports undercover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F).

Form 20-F X Form 40-F</div>

NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO OR FROM ANY JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OR REGULATIONS OF SUCH JURISDICTION

26 October 2025

#### HSBC Holdings plc
<div align='center'>**Update on Herald Fund SPC litigation relating to the Madoff fraud**</div>

In a 2009 lawsuit in Luxembourg relating to the Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC fraud, HSBC Securities Services Luxembourg ('HSSL') is defending a claim brought by Herald Fund SPC ('Herald') for restitution of securities and cash. For prior disclosure on this matter, please refer to page 98 of the HSBC Holdings plc 2025 Interim Report (https://www.hsbc.com/investors/results-and-announcements).

On 24 October 2025, the Luxembourg Court of Cassation denied HSSL's appeal in respect of Herald's securities restitution claim, but accepted HSSL's appeal in respect of Herald's cash restitution claim. HSSL will now pursue a second appeal before the Luxembourg Court of Appeal.

If HSSL is unsuccessful in that second appeal, it will contest the amount HSSL is required to pay in subsequent proceedings before the Court of Appeal.

Following this development, HSBC Holdings plc will recognise a provision of US$1.1bn in its consolidated financial results for Q325, an around 15 bps impact on the Group's CET1 capital ratio. Given the pendency of the second appeal and the complexities and uncertainties associated with determining the quantum of restitution, the eventual financial impact could be significantly different. The provision will be classified as a material notable item and