Company: UZF
Filing Date: 2025-11-07
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0000821130-25-000070
Chunk: 209

Company: ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-11-07
Form: 10-Q
Item: Item 8
Chunk 209
---
2025, the D.C. Circuit reversed the district court’s decision dismissing the case involving Advantage, and remanded that case to the district court for further proceedings.

Array believes that the Relators’ claims are without merit and that Advantage’s and King Street’s participation in FCC auctions complied with applicable law and FCC Rules. 

On May 2, 2023, a putative stockholder class action was filed against TDS and Array and certain current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. An Amended Complaint was filed on September 1, 2023, which names TDS, Array, and certain current Array officers and directors as defendants, and alleges that certain public statements made between May 6, 2022 and November 3, 2022 (the potential class period) regarding, among other things, Array’s business strategies to address subscriber demand, violated Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of stockholders who purchased TDS equity securities during the potential class period and demands unspecified money damages. On November 1, 2024, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part the defendants' motion to dismiss the lawsuit. On February 28, 2025, the parties reached a settlement in principle. On April 25, 2025, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. On September 4, 2025, the court approved the settlement and dismissed the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice.

On January 31, 2025, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division against certain TDS and Array directors and officers, and nominal defendant TDS. The derivative lawsuit takes issue with the same public statements made between May 6, 2022 and November 3, 2022, alleging that the fact that the statements were made was a breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the officer and director defendants, and bringing claims for indemnification and contribution against the officer and director defendants and Array. In addition to indemnification and contribution, the plaintiff seeks money damages and the implementation of certain governance proposals. On July 21, 2025, a motion to intervene in the lawsuit was filed by the stockholder plaintiff who had previously filed a stockholder derivative lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois