Company: BCS
Filing Date: 2025-02-13
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0000312069-25-000114
Chunk: 286

Company: BARCLAYS PLC
Filing Date: 2025-02-13
Form: 20-F
Chunk 286
---
 equity (RoTE) (excluding material items1,2) 25% 0% of award vests for RoTE of 7.0%, rising on a straight-line basis 25% of award vests for RoTE of 11.0% or higher 11.3%3 25.0 % Average cost: income ratio (excluding material items)4 10% 0% of award vests for average cost: income ratio of 65.0%, rising on a straight-line basis 10% of award vests for average cost: income ratio of 59.0% or lower 63.1% 3.2% Maintain CET 1 ratio within the target range 10% If CET1 is below MDA hurdle +190bps during the period, the Committee will consider what portion of this element should vest, based on the causes of the CET1 reduction. If CET1 is above MDA hurdle +290bps but does not make progress towards the range over the period, the Committee will consider what portion of this element should vest, based on the reasons for the elevated levels of CET1 versus target range and the associated impacts. If CET1 ratio between 190bps and 290bps above the MDA hurdle throughout the period or if CET1 is above MDA hurdle +290bps but making progress towards the target range 2022:13.9% 2023:13.8% 2024:13.6% (more information is provided below the table) 10.0 % Relative total shareholder return5 25% 6.25% of award vests for performance at median of the peer group6, rising on a straight-line basis 25% of award vests for performance at or above the upper quartile Between median and upper quartile (rank 9 out of 18) 8.5% Strategic non-financial measures (details from page 150) 20% The evaluation focused on key strategic non-financial measures, which the Committee assessed to determine the percentage of the award that will vest, between 0% and 20%. The measures are organised around three main categories: Customers & clients (weighted 5%), Colleagues (weighted 5%); and Climate & sustainability (weighted 10%). 14.0% Risk scorecard (details on page 152) 10% The Risk scorecard captures a range of risks and is aligned with the annual incentive risk alignment framework shared with the regulators. The framework measures performance against three