Company: FVN
Filing Date: 2025-03-27
Form Type: DRS/A
Source: 0001829126-25-002094
Chunk: 94

Company: Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-03-27
Form: DRS/A
Chunk 94
---
 of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of users and other interested persons. The availability of information on instant messaging applications and social media platforms is virtually immediate as its impact without affording VIWO an opportunity for redress or correction. The opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate information, is seemingly limitless and readily available. Information concerning VIWO, shareholders, directors, officers and employees may be posted on such platforms at any time. The risks associated with any such negative publicity or incorrect information cannot be eliminated entirely or mitigated and may materially harm VIWO’s reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

VIWO’s failure to protect intellectual property rights may undermine its competitive position.

VIWO believes that its patents, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property are essential to the success of VIWO. VIWO depends to a large extent on the ability to develop and maintain the intellectual property rights relating to VIWO’s Business intelligence digital technology solutions and products. VIWO has devoted considerable time and energy to the development and improvement of software, websites, and intellectual property.

VIWO relies primarily on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets laws, and contractual restrictions for the protection of the intellectual property used in VIWO’s business. Nevertheless, these provide only limited protection and the actions VIWO takes to protect intellectual property rights may not be adequate. VIWO’s trade secrets may become known or be independently discovered by competitors. VIWO may have no rights or limited rights to stop others’ use of VIWO’s information, including intellectual property. Moreover, to the extent that VIWO’s employees or third parties with whom VIWO does business use intellectual property owned by others in their work for VIWO, disputes may arise as to the rights to such intellectual property. Furthermore, it is often difficult to maintain and enforce intellectual property rights in China. Statutory laws and regulations are subject to judicial interpretation and enforcement, and may not be applied consistently due to the lack of clear guidance on statutory interpretation. Contractual restrictions may be breached by counterparties, and there may not be adequate remedies available to VIWO for any such breach. Accordingly, VIWO may not be able to effectively protect intellectual property rights or to enforce VIWO’s contractual rights in China. Preventing any unauthorized use of VIWO’s intellectual property is difficult and costly and the steps VIWO takes may be inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of company intellectual property. In the event that VIWO resorts to litigation to enforce intellectual property rights, such litigation could result in substantial