Company: RAIN
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-035587
Chunk: 78

Company: Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form: 424B3
Chunk 78
---
 that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the Warrant Agreement
do not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district
courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest
in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in the Warrant Agreement. If any
action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions of the Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than
a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”)
in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state
and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions
(an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action
by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.

This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability
to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with Holdco, which may discourage such lawsuits and result in
increased costs to warrant holders to bring a lawsuit. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our Warrant Agreement
inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs
associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and the Board.

The Warrants are recognized and accounted for as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815 and are recorded at fair value upon issuance with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Class A Common Stock.

The guidance contained in FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and
Hedging” (“ASC 815”) provides that because the Warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each
Warrant must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, we classify