Company: EUDAW
Filing Date: 2025-11-18
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001493152-25-024074
Chunk: 32

Company: EUDA Health Holdings Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-11-18
Form: 424B5
Chunk 32
---
 Singapore. All of our directors and executives are residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for shareholders to effect service of process within the United States upon these individuals, or to bring an action against us or these individuals in the United States, or to enforce against us or these individuals judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

We have appointed Cogency Global Inc., 122 East 42nd Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10154, as our agent upon whom process may be served in any action brought against us under the securities laws of the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman Pte. Ltd. (“Conyers”), our counsel as to British Virgin Islands law, has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the British Virgin Islands (i) recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States, or (ii) entertain original actions brought in the British Virgin Islands against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman Pte. Ltd further advised us that although there is no statutory enforcement in the British Virgin Islands of final and conclusive monetary judgments obtained in a competent federal or state court of the United States for a definite sum (and the British Virgin Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments), the courts of the British Virgin Islands would recognise as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in a competent federal or state court of the United States of America against the Company under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the British Virgin Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the British Virgin Islands