Company: FOACW
Filing Date: 2025-05-20
Form Type: 10-K/A
Source: 0001828937-25-000032
Chunk: 44

Company: Finance of America Companies Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-05-20
Form: 10-K/A
Chunk 44
---
 stakeholder expectations have resulted in increased general and administrative expenses and increased management time and attention spent complying with or meeting such regulations and expectations. Developing and acting on initiatives within the scope of ESG, and collecting, measuring, and reporting ESG related information and metrics can be costly, difficult, and time consuming and is subject to evolving reporting standards, including climate-related reporting requirements that the SEC may pursue, new climate disclosure rules adopted by the state of California, and similar proposals by other U.S. regulatory bodies. Such restrictions and requirements could increase our costs or require additional technology and capital investment, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Additionally, ESG and other sustainability matters and the adequacy of our response and disclosures relating to these matters could harm our business, including in areas such as diversity, equity, and inclusion, human rights, climate change and environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance, and transparency. Increasing governmental, investor, and societal attention to ESG matters, including expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure on topics such as climate change, human capital, labor, and risk oversight, could expand the nature, scope, and complexity of matters that we are required to control, assess, and report. Further, various third-party organizations have developed ratings processes or second party opinions (“SPOs”) for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. FAR has received an SPO in connection with certain of its non-agency loan securitizations. These third-party ESG ratings may be used by some investors to assist with their investment and voting decisions. Any unfavorable ESG ratings or SPOs may lead to reputational damage and negative sentiment among our investors and other stakeholders. These factors may alter the environment in which we do business and may increase the ongoing costs of compliance and adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows. Conversely, anti-ESG sentiment has gained some momentum across the U.S. Failure to successfully manage divergent ESG-related expectations across stakeholders could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and adversely affect our business. If we are unable to adequately address such ESG matters or we fail or are perceived to fail to comply with all laws, regulations, policies, and related interpretations, it could negatively impact our reputation and our business results.

#### 27
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fires, floods, and other natural catastrophic events, which may increase in frequency or severity as a result of global climate change, and to interruption by man-made issues such