Company: ILLRW
Filing Date: 2025-01-24
Form Type: S-1
Source: 0001213900-25-006210
Chunk: 259

Company: Triller Group Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-01-24
Form: S-1
Chunk 259
---
 a rate of $150,000.00 per month based on its allegation that Triller wrongfully and prematurely terminated the contract before its
term expired.

<div align='center'>146</div>

The parties have briefed JAMS on the issue of
jurisdiction. Triller argues that JAMS has no jurisdiction per the parties’ choice of law and venue clause, and that this case must
be adjudicated in India along with Concentrix’s other action that is currently pending there against Triller for past due service
fees under the same agreement. JAMS has indicated that it has jurisdiction to determine the threshold issue of whether this matter can
be adjudicated at JAMs or whether it must be adjudicated in a court in New Delhi, India.

Triller estimates a settlement or judgment would
result in approximately $2.0 million.

Epic Promotions v. Triller Fight Club, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 9:24-cv-80409; (5209.74)

This is a contract dispute between Triller Fight
Club LLC and fighters and their manager, Epic Promotions. Triller owes fighters over $1,000,000.00 per settlement agreement related to
Triller’s earlier nonpayment. Epic desires to work with Triller to produce future fights, and understands Triller is not currently
able to contribute any cash to a fight. Triller might partner with Epic and the fighters on distribution of a March 2024 fight, but that
fight will not have any effect on money due and owing under settlement agreement.

On April 5, 2024, Epic commenced litigation in
the District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Triller for breach of the settlement agreement praying for $1,760.000.00
in damages plus it’s attorney’s fees which shall be awarded to the prevailing party per the settlement agreement. Triller
has retained local Florida counsel and will file a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue.
If the motion is successful, the case will be dismissed. However, Epic could refile it in California.

Concentrix Daksh Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. Triller Inc.(India)

On or about January 12, 2023, Concentrix Daksh
Services India filed a complaint against Triller Inc. in Gurugram District and Sessions Courts alleging failure to pay service fees in
the sum of $777,585. We have opposed such action