Company: DBO
Filing Date: 2025-11-10
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-273330
Chunk: 71

Company: Invesco DB Oil Fund
Filing Date: 2025-11-10
Form: 424B3
Chunk 71
---
 it failed to diligently supervise matters related to its business as a CFTC registrant. Civil Litigation On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On December 21, 2018, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgement and granted in part MS&Co.’s motion for sanctions related to the spoliation of evidence. On January 18, 2019, CDIB filed a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. On January 24, 2019, CDIB filed a notice of appeal from the court’s December 21, 2018 order, and on January 25, 2019, MS&Co. filed a notice of appeal from the same order. On March 7, 2019 the court denied the relief requested by CDIB in its January 24, 2019 appeal. On December 5, 2019, the Appellate Division, First Department heard the parties’ cross-appeals. On May 21, 2020, the First Department modified the order of the Supreme Court of NY to deny the

47

MS&Co.’s motion for sanctions relating to spoliation of evidence and otherwise affirmed the denial of the MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgment. On June 19,