Company: AEHL
Filing Date: 2025-08-05
Form Type: 20-F/A
Source: 0001641172-25-022290
Chunk: 38

Company: Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-08-05
Form: 20-F/A
Chunk 38
---
 We have received land use certificates for certain parcels of land on which our operations reside, but we may not have followed
all procedures required to obtain such certificates or paid all required fees. If the Chinese administrative authorities determine that
we have not fully complied with all procedures and requirements needed to hold a land use certificate, we may be forced by the Chinese
administrative authorities to retroactively comply with such procedures and requirements, which may be burdensome and require us to make
payments, or such Chinese administrative authorities may invalidate or revoke our land use certificate entirely. If the land use right
certificates needed for our operations are determined by the government of China to be invalid or if they are not renewed, we may lose
production facilities or employee accommodations that would be difficult or even impossible to replace. Should we have to relocate, our
workforce may be unable or unwilling to work in the new location and our business operations will be disrupted during the relocation.
The relocation or loss of facilities could cause us to lose sales and/or increase our costs of production, which would negatively impact
our financial results.

It may be difficult for overseas shareholders and/or regulators to conduct investigation or collect evidence within China.

Shareholder claims or regulatory
investigation that are common in the United States generally are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in China. For
example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation
initiated outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory
authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities
regulatory authorities in the U.S. may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according
to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed
to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. While detailed interpretation of
or implementation rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct
investigation or evidence collection activities within China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.

Our principal business operation
is conducted in the PRC. If U.S. regulators carry out an investigation of us and there is a need to conduct investigation or collect evidence
within the territory of the PRC, the U.S. regulators may not