Company: FRFXF
Filing Date: 2025-10-09
Form Type: F-10/A
Source: 0001104659-25-098335
Chunk: 132

Company: FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LTD/ CAN
Filing Date: 2025-10-09
Form: F-10/A
Chunk 132
---
 a manner contrary to the principles of natural justice but the New York Judgment would not be contrary to natural justice by reason only that service of process was effected on the agent for service of process appointed by the Company pursuant to the Indenture; (B) the New York Judgment is for a claim which under the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein would be characterized as based on a foreign revenue, expropriatory, penal or other public law; (C) the New York Judgment is contrary to Ontario public policy, as such term is interpreted under the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein, or to an order made by the Attorney General of Canada under the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act (Canada) or by the Competition Tribunal under the Competition Act (Canada) in respect of certain judgments referred to in these statutes, or to an order or regulation made by the Governor in Council under the Special Economic Measures Act (Canada) or the United Nations Act (Canada) in respect of certain activities or measures referred to in those statutes; and (D) the New York Judgment has been satisfied or is void under the laws of the State of New York. In the opinion of such counsel, there are currently no reasons under the law of Ontario for avoiding recognition of said judgments of New York Courts under the Indenture or on the Notes based upon public policy. The Company has been advised by such counsel that a monetary judgment of a U.S. court predicated solely upon civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws would likely be enforceable in Canada if the U.S. court in which judgment was obtained had a basis for jurisdiction that was recognized by a Canadian court for such purposes. The Company has also been advised by its counsel, that it is less certain that an original action could be commenced in Canada on the basis of liability predicated solely upon such laws.

#### Consent to Jurisdiction
The Company has irrevocably appointed CT Corporation System, 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005, as its authorized agent for service of process in any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Indenture in respect of the Notes for actions brought under United States federal or state securities laws or for actions brought by either trustee or for any actions arising out of or related to the Indenture (in respect of the Notes) or the Notes in any New York Court, and has irrevocably submitted to the jurisdiction of the New York Courts