Company: KMRK
Filing Date: 2025-09-24
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-091102
Chunk: 69

Company: K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD
Filing Date: 2025-09-24
Form: 424B3
Chunk 69
---
 and (4) where
the company has not complied with provisions requiring approval of a special or extraordinary majority of shareholders. This means that
even if shareholders were to sue us successfully, they may not be able to recover anything to make up for the losses suffered.

Under
the laws of the BVI, the rights of minority shareholders are protected by provisions of the BCA dealing with shareholder remedies
and other remedies available under common law (in tort or contractual remedies). The principal protection under statutory law is
that shareholders may bring an action to enforce the constitutional documents of the company (i.e. the memorandum and articles of
association) as shareholders are entitled to have the affairs of the company conducted in accordance with the BCA and the memorandum
and articles of association of the company. A shareholder may also bring an action under statute if he feels that the affairs of the
company have been or will be carried out in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial or discriminating or oppressive to him. The BCA
also provides for certain other protections for minority shareholders, including in respect of investigation of the company and
inspection of the company books and records. There are also common law rights for the protection of shareholders that may be
invoked, largely dependent on English common law, since the common law of the BVI for business companies is limited.

<div align='center'>34</div>

Certain corporate
governance practices in the BVI, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other
jurisdictions such as the U.S. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters,
our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic
issuers.

As a result of all
of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management,
members of the Board or the Controlling Shareholder than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the U.S. For
a discussion of significant differences between the provisions the Companies Act and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in
the U.S. and their shareholders, please refer to the section titled “Description of Shares — Differences in
Corporate Law”.

Our dual-class voting structure will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A Shares may view as beneficial.

We have a dual-class voting structure consisting of Class A Shares
and Class