Company: CIO
Filing Date: 2025-08-22
Form Type: PREM14A
Source: 0001193125-25-186443
Chunk: 19

Company: City Office REIT, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-08-22
Form: PREM14A
Chunk 19
---
 other equitable remedy to specifically enforce Parent and Merger Sub’s obligation to effect the closing on the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement in the event that (1) the mutual conditions to the parties’ obligations to effect the Merger and the additional conditions to the obligations of Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing; provided, that 10

each such condition is then capable of being satisfied at the closing) have been satisfied or waived, (2) the debt financing is available to be funded or will be funded or will be funded if
the equity financing is funded, in each case in accordance with the terms of the debt commitment letter, (3) Parent has failed to consummate the closing at the time when it was required under the Merger Agreement, and (4) we have
irrevocably confirmed in writing to Parent that if specific performance were granted and the debt financing and equity financing were funded, then the closing will occur within five business days after receipt of such irrevocable confirmation.

Regulatory Matters (page 62)

We are unaware of any material federal, state or foreign regulatory requirements or approvals that are required for the execution of the Merger Agreement or
the completion of the Merger, other than the acceptance for record of the Articles of Merger with respect to the Merger by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland.

No Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal (page 94)

We are organized as a corporation under Maryland law. Because our Common Stock was listed on the NYSE on the Record Date for determining stockholders entitled
to vote at the Special Meeting, our stockholders holding Common Stock do not have any appraisal rights, dissenters’ rights or the rights of an objecting stockholder under the Maryland General Corporation Law (“MGCL”) in connection
with the Merger. In addition, holders of our Common Stock may not exercise any appraisal rights, dissenters’ rights or the rights of an objecting stockholder to receive the fair value of the stockholder’s shares in connection with the
Merger because, as permitted by the MGCL, our charter provides that stockholders are not entitled to exercise such rights unless the Board, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board, determines that the rights apply. The Board has made no
such determination. However, our stockholders can vote against the Merger Proposal. In addition, holders of our Preferred