Company: MSTR
Filing Date: 2025-04-28
Form Type: DEF 14A
Source: 0001193125-25-100720
Chunk: 29

Company: Strategy Inc
Filing Date: 2025-04-28
Form: DEF 14A
Chunk 29
---
200,000 shares of Perpetual Strike Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $17,000,000. Directed Share Program As part of the Strife IPO, at the Company’s request, the underwriters reserved up to 425,000 shares of Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock for sale at the public offering price through a directed share program to certain of the Company’s employees, officers and directors based in the United States. Under the directed share program, Phong Q. Le purchased 6,000 shares of Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock for $510,000, Andrew Kang purchased 1,500 shares of Perpetual Strife preferred Stock for $127,500, and W. Ming Shao purchased 500 shares of Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock for $42,500. Allocation Agreement On August 31, 2022, the District of Columbia (the “District”), through its Office of the Attorney General, filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia naming as defendants (i) Michael J. Saylor, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s Executive Chairman, in his personal capacity, and (ii) the Company. The District sought, among other relief, monetary damages under the District’s False Claims Act for the alleged failure of Mr. Saylor to pay personal income taxes to the District over a number of years together with penalties, interest, and treble damages. The complaint alleged in the sole claim against the Company that it violated the District’s False Claims Act by conspiring to assist Mr. Saylor’s alleged failure to pay personal income taxes. On May 31, 2024, the District, Mr. Saylor, and the Company stipulated to the entry of a Consent Order and Judgment (“Consent Order”) with the court pursuant to which the District, upon receipt of all amounts due under the Consent Order, released Mr. Saylor and the Company from all claims and liabilities that the District asserted, could have asserted, or may assert in the future based on the conduct described in the complaints filed in the case. In connection with the Consent Order, on May 31, 2024, the Company and Mr. Saylor entered into an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Saylor and the Company agreed that Mr. Saylor would pay $40,000,000 due to the District to settle the case and resolve the litigation with the District. Pursuant to a separate agreement between Mr. Saylor and the Company