Company: SERV
Filing Date: 2025-10-10
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-098177
Chunk: 39

Company: Serve Robotics Inc. /DE/
Filing Date: 2025-10-10
Form: 424B5
Chunk 39
---
) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, employee, or agent of ours; (c) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against us or any current or former director, officer or employee of ours arising out of or pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, or to interpret, apply or determine the validity of, any provision of the DGCL, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended and restated bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time); (d) any action, suit or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or (e) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against us or any current or former director, officer or employee of ours governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in all cases subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants. However, such forum selection provisions will not apply to actions, suits or proceedings brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts of the United States have exclusive jurisdiction. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. |

<div align='center'>10</div>

Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent
jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the
rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. As noted above,
the amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the federal district courts of the United States will have exclusive
jurisdiction over any action asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether
a court would enforce such provision. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws
and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive
federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations
thereunder. As noted above, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the choice of