Company: GOOGL
Filing Date: 2025-05-07
Form Type: PX14A6G
Source: 0000921895-25-001315
Chunk: 0

Company: Alphabet Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-05-07
Form: PX14A6G
Chunk 0
---
<div align='center'>UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

NOTICE OF EXEMPT SOLICITATION

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)</div>

NAME OF REGISTRANT: Alphabet Inc.

NAME OF PERSONS RELYING ON EXEMPTION:The
Anti-Defamation League & JLens

ADDRESS OF PERSON RELYING ON EXEMPTION:605 3rd Ave, New York, NY 10158

WRITTEN MATERIALS: The following written material is attached – Proxy Memorandum, datedMay 7, 2025

<div align='center'>* * *</div>

Written materials are submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This is not a solicitation of authority to vote any proxy.The Anti-Defamation League & JLens are not asking for your proxy card and will not accept proxy cards if sent. The cost of this filing is being borne entirely by JLens and its affiliates. Submission is not required of this filer under the terms of the Rule, but is made voluntarily in the interest of public disclosure and consideration of these important issues.

PLEASE NOTE:The Anti-Defamation League & JLens are not asking for your proxy card and cannot accept your proxy card. Please DO NOT send us your proxy card.

<div align='center'>(Written material follows on next page)

PROXY MEMORANDUM</div>

| To: | Shareholders of Alphabet Inc. (the “Company” or “Alphabet”) |

| From: | The Anti-Defamation League (“ADL”) & JLens (together, “we”) |

| Re: | The case to vote AGAINST Proposal 9 (“Report on the Due Diligence Process to Assess Human Rights 
 Risks in CAHRA”) on Alphabet’s 2025 Proxy Statement                                              |

We Urge You to Vote AGAINST Proposal 9 on Alphabet’s 2025 Proxy Statement

Proposal 9 calls on Alphabet to commission
an independent third-party report “on the due diligence process [Alphabet] uses to determine whether customers’ use of products
and services for surveillance, censorship, and/or military purposes contributes to human rights harms in conflict-affected and high-risk
areas (CAHRA).”

While framed as a call for neutral oversight,
we believe the measure co-opts the CAHRA framework to advance