Company: FTII
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001493152-25-006997
Chunk: 109

Company: FutureTech II Acquisition Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form: S-4
Chunk 109
---
 in the Warrant Agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum
provisions of the Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of the FutureTech Warrants (and after
the Business Combination, the FutureTech Warrants), such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of
the state and federal courts located within the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and
(y) having service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s
counsel in the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.

| 41 |

This choice-of-forum
provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with FutureTech,
which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of the Warrant Agreement inapplicable or unenforceable
with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations
and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.

The combined company is
an emerging growth company and smaller reporting company, and the combined company cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements
applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies will make its shares less attractive to investors.

After the completion
of the Business Combination, the combined company will be an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups
Act (the “JOBS Act”). For as long as the combined company continues to be an emerging growth company, it may take advantage
of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,”
including exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced
disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on
executive compensation and stockholder