Company: SQM
Filing Date: 2025-12-15
Form Type: 6-K
Source: 0000909037-25-000048
Chunk: 160

Company: CHEMICAL & MINING CO OF CHILE INC
Filing Date: 2025-12-15
Form: 6-K
Chunk 160
---
 13, 2024. On July 1, 2025, the Santiago Court of Appeals rejected the appeal, upholding the first-instance ruling. Subsequently, on July 18, 2025, an appeal was filed against the second ruling, which was granted by resolution dated July 25 of the same year. We are awaiting the processing of the appeal before the Supreme Court. (c) On March 24, 2017, a tax claim was filed before the Third Tax and Customs Court of the Metropolitan Region against liquidation No. 207 issued by the Chilean IRS, relating to the 2016 tax year. The amount involved is US$ 5.5 million of which (i) US$ 1.2 million relates to amounts paid in excess, (ii) US$ 3.8 million relates to the tax claimed (net of the effect on corporate tax), and (iii) US$ 0.5 million relates to interest and penalties. On October 30, 2024, a ruling was issued rejecting the tax claim. An appeal was granted on December 13, 2024. On July 1, 2025, the Santiago Court of Appeals rejected the appeal, upholding the first-instance ruling. Subsequently, on July 18, 2025, an appeal was filed against the second ruling, which was granted by resolution dated July 25 of the same year. We are awaiting the processing of the appeal before the Supreme Court. Notes to the Consolidated Interim Financial Statements September 30, 2025 132 (d) On July 15, 2021, SQM Salar filed before the First Tax and Customs Court of the Metropolitan Region a tax annulment and claim against assessments 65 and 66 for the tax years 2017 and 2018. The amount in dispute is US$ 63.9 million, where (i) US$ 17.6 million is overpaid taxes, (ii) US$ 30.2 million is tax claimed net of corporate income tax, and (iii) US$ 16.1 million is associated interest and penalties. On November 7, 2022, the First Tax and Customs Court upheld SQM Salar's claim and ordered the annulment of these tax assessments. On April 5, 2024, the Santiago Court of Appeals reversed the first instance ruling insofar as it accepted the annulment suit aimed at challenging the liquidations,