Company: NRK
Filing Date: 2025-11-06
Form Type: N-CSR
Source: 0001193125-25-269228
Chunk: 172

Company: NUVEEN NEW YORK AMT-FREE QUALITY MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND
Filing Date: 2025-11-06
Form: N-CSR
Chunk 172
---
 the responsibility of the Adviser, not the Funds. The Board’s considerations regarding the comparative fee data for each Fund are set forth below:

| • |     | For Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management                                                                                                                                          
 fee rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median. In its review, the Board, however, also considered, among other things, the composition of the Expense Universe, which was comprised of a small peer set with only two 
 of the peers unaffiliated with Nuveen funds.                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

| • |     | For Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate                                                                                      
 was above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate matched and the net total expense ratio was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee 
 rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median.                                 |

| • |     | For Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate matched, the                                 
 actual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) and the net total expense ratio was below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New Jersey Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate and net                                                                                                                                    
 total expense ratio were each above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median. In its review, the Board, however, considered, among other 
 things, that there was only one peer other than the Fund in the Expense Universe.                                                                                                                                                              |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate was                                                                                                                      
 above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median, and the Fund’s net total expense ratio was below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee 
 rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median.                               |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund, although