Company: SVREW
Filing Date: 2025-06-24
Form Type: DRS
Source: 0001213900-25-057237
Chunk: 61

Company: SaverOne 2014 Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-06-24
Form: DRS
Chunk 61
---
>

Israel

We have been informed by our
legal counsel in Israel, Doron Tikotzky Kantor Gutman & Amit Gross, that it may be difficult to assert U.S. securities law claims
in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on a violation of U.S. securities laws because
Israel is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine
that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law
must be proved as a fact which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli
law.

Subject to specified time
limitations and legal procedures, Israeli courts may enforce a U.S. judgment in a civil matter which, subject to certain exceptions, is
non-appealable, including judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and including
a monetary or compensatory judgment in a non-civil matter, provided that among other things:

| ● | the judgment is obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, according to the laws of the state in which the judgment is given and the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel; |

| ● | the judgment is final and is not subject to any right of appeal; |

| ● | the prevailing law of the foreign state in which the judgment was rendered allows for the enforcement of judgments of Israeli courts; |

| ● | adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to present his or her evidence; |

| ● | the liabilities under the judgment are enforceable according to the laws of the State of Israel and the judgment and the enforcement of the civil liabilities set forth in the judgment is not contrary to the law or public policy in Israel nor likely to impair the security or sovereignty of Israel; |

| ● | the judgment was not obtained by fraud and does not conflict with any other valid judgments in the same matter between the same parties; |

| ● | an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign court; and |

<div align='center'>33</div>

| ● | the judgment is enforceable according to the laws of Israel and according to the law of the foreign state