Company: CVBF
Filing Date: 2025-04-08
Form Type: DEF 14A
Source: 0000950170-25-051966
Chunk: 93

Company: CVB FINANCIAL CORP
Filing Date: 2025-04-08
Form: DEF 14A
Chunk 93
---
 and time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, while also considering how each type of award incentivizes the Company’s executives to accomplish important corporate objectives. For example, in considering whether to grant time-based versus performance-based awards, the Compensation Committee will consider how to strike the appropriate balance between creating incentives for performance as well as retention. In addition, the Compensation Committee takes into account, with respect to the type of award under consideration, the compensation expense and potential share dilution factor associated with each form of equity incentive compensation.

#### page66
Equity IncentiveGrant Practices.The Compensation Committee has concluded that an annual cycle for equity awards is an appropriate interval for making grants, based on (i) prevailing practices for the grant of awards at competitor financial institutions in the peer group described above in the section of this proxy statement on “Peer Group Criteria and Composition for 2024,” (ii) the Compensation Committee’s desire to enhance the reward and retention elements of CVB Financial Corp.’s equity incentive program, and (iii) the Compensation Committee’s desire to achieve a sequential series of award values that would more accurately track the average prices of CVB Financial Corp. stock over a given period of time. In addition, on occasion, we grant stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units on dates outside our normal award cycle. This may be done in conjunction with the hiring or promotion of an individual manager, renewal of an employment contract or as a special incentive.

For 2024, our Compensation Committee decided to maintain several key “best practices” originally adopted in connection with the Company’s 2020 equity award program, again based on peer data and recommendations provided by our outside compensation consultants at Pearl Meyer. These key elements included (i) the making of annual as opposed to multi-year equity grants for all our continuing NEOs, including our President and CEO, so as to provide the Committee with the flexibility to adjust equity awards more regularly in order to better reflect the Company’s and each executive’s ongoing performance and goals, (ii) the incorporation of a strong component of performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) in regular annual equity awards to be granted to each of our continuing NEOs, and (iii) the development of consistent performance criteria for the vesting of PRSUs and the utilization of a three-year performance period over which such performance criteria would be measured. The Committee continues to believe the employment of these features is consistent with articulated “best practices” utilized in similar equity programs by the Company’s peer banking institutions.

Pursuant to Item