Company: CCIXW
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form Type: S-4/A
Source: 0001193125-25-309933
Chunk: 217

Company: Churchill Capital Corp IX/Cayman
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form: S-4/A
Chunk 217
---
ited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that would have been achieved had the business combination been consummated on the dates indicated above, or the future consolidated results of operations or financial position of the Post-Closing Company. The pro forma adjustments are based on the information currently available and the assumptions and estimates underlying the pro forma adjustments are described in the accompanying notes. Accordingly, the Post-Closing Company’s business, assets, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition may differ significantly from those indicated by the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this document. For more information, please see the section entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.”

The assumptions used in preparing the unaudited pro forma financial information may not prove to be accurate and other factors may affect the Post-Closing Company’s financial condition or results of operations following the Closing. Any potential decline in the Post-Closing Company’s financial condition or results of operations may cause significant variations in the price of the Post-Closing Company’s securities.

The CCIX public warrant agreement designates the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of CCIX warrants, which could limit the ability of CCIX warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with CCIX.

The CCIX warrant agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (1) any action, proceeding or claim against CCIX arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (2) that CCIX irrevocably submits to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. CCIX will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. CCIX notes, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce this provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

<div align='center'>118</div>

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the