Company: TCMFF
Filing Date: 2025-02-28
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001104659-25-019133
Chunk: 341

Company: TELECOM ARGENTINA SA
Filing Date: 2025-02-28
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 18
Chunk 341
---
 respect to all cable television licensees represented by the Argentine Cable Television Association (“ATVC”, for its Spanish acronym). The National Government filed an appeal such resolution, which was dismissed. The National Government filed a direct appeal with the Supreme Court of Justice, which has also been dismissed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, between March 2011 and October 2014, several resolutions based on Resolution No. 50/10 were published in the Official Gazette, which regulated the prices to be charged by Cablevisión to its customers for the basic cable television service. The Company filed appeals against these resolutions and their enforcement was suspended pursuant to the above-mentioned injunction.
In September 2014, the Supreme Court of Justice rendered a decision in re “Municipality of Berazategui v. Cablevisión” and ordered that the cases related to these resolutions continue under the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Appeals of Mar del Plata that had issued the decision on the collective action in favor of ATVC. Currently, all the claims related to this matter are pending before the Federal Courts of Mar del Plata.
In April 2019, La Capital Cable S.A. was served notice of the decision rendered by Federal Court No. 2 of Mar del Plata, whereby said court declared the unconstitutionality of certain articles of the law on which the SCI grounded Resolution No. 50/10 as well as the subsequent resolutions. The declaration of unconstitutionality entails that these resolutions are not applicable to La Capital Cable and the companies represented by ATVC. However, the National Government filed an appeal against said resolution.
On December 26, 2019, the Federal Court of Mar del Plata rejected the grievances of the National Government and confirmed the decision rendered by the court of first instance which declared the unconstitutionality of the sections of the law based on which the SCI issued Resolution No. 50/10 and the subsequent resolutions. The National Government and ENACOM filed extraordinary appeals, which although they were granted during 2021, are still pending before the Supreme Court of Justice.
On November 15, 2024, Resolution No. 50/10 was repealed by Resolution No. 433/2024 of the Secretariat of Industry and Commerce.
The Company, with the assistance of its legal advisors, is evaluating the potential impacts of the repeal on the case.
3.     Gain Contingencies
“AFA Plus Project” Claim
On July 20, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with the Argentine