Company: RMIX
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001104659-25-110488
Chunk: 125

Company: Suncrete, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form: S-4
Chunk 125
---
 difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon Haymaker’s directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the U.S. courts against Haymaker’s directors or officers.

Until the Domestication is effected, Haymaker’s corporate affairs are governed by the Existing Organizational Documents, the Cayman Island Companies Act (Revised) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of its directors to Haymaker under the laws of the Cayman Islands are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, Appeals from the Cayman Islands Courts to the Privy Council (which is the final Court of Appeal for British overseas territories such as the Cayman Islands) are binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. Decisions of the English courts, and particularly the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal are generally of persuasive authority but are not binding in the courts of the Cayman Islands. Decisions of courts in other Commonwealth jurisdictions are similarly of persuasive but not binding authority. The rights of Haymaker’s shareholders and the fiduciary duties of its directors under The Companies Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have

<div align='center'>48</div>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands exempted companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Haymaker has been advised by its Cayman Islands legal counsel that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against Haymaker judgments of courts of the United States obtained against Haymaker or its directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against Haymaker or its directors and officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state in the US, so far as the liabilities imposed by