Company: PCG-PB
Filing Date: 2025-07-31
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001004980-25-000132
Chunk: 90

Company: PG&E Corp
Filing Date: 2025-07-31
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 8
Chunk 90
---
1054” below.)  PG&E Corporation and the Utility disagree with many allegations in the Cal Fire Investigation Report and plan to vigorously contest them.  However, if the CPUC or the FERC were to reach conclusions similar to those of the Cal Fire Investigation Report, it may determine that the Utility had been imprudent, in which case some or all of its costs recorded to the WEMA would not be recoverable, the Utility would not be able to recover costs through FERC TO rates, or the Utility would be required to reimburse the Wildfire Fund for the costs and expenses that are allocated to it.

72

As of July 23, 2025, PG&E Corporation and the Utility are aware of approximately 184 complaints on behalf of at least 8,894 individual plaintiffs related to the 2021 Dixie fire and expect that they may receive further complaints.  The plaintiffs seek damages that include wrongful death, property damage, economic loss, medical monitoring, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and other damages.  The court has scheduled and vacated numerous bellwether trial dates, including the previously scheduled bellwether trial date of June 23, 2025.The Collins Pine Company and a group of timber companies filed a complaint against PG&E Corporation and the Utility on April 10, 2024.  PG&E Corporation and the Utility answered this complaint on May 28, 2024.Cal Fire filed a complaint against the Utility to recover suppression and investigation costs on June 30, 2023.  The Utility filed an amended answer to the complaint on September 30, 2024.  On October 10, 2024, Cal Fire filed a demurrer and motion to strike portions of the amended answer.  On February 7, 2025, the court issued a ruling sustaining Cal Fire’s demurrer and striking portions of the Utility’s amended answer.  On April 7, 2025, the Utility filed a petition for writ of mandate in the California First District Court of Appeal, seeking an order directing the trial court to reverse the ruling on Cal Fire’s demurrer and motion to strike.  On April 30, 2025, in response to the Court of Appeal’s request, Cal Fire filed an opposition to the Utility’s writ.  The Utility filed a reply to the opposition on May 9, 2025.  As of July 30, 2025, the writ remains pending with the Court of Appeal.On February