Company: SCE-PL
Filing Date: 2025-09-08
Form Type: SF-1
Source: 0001193125-25-198426
Chunk: 46

Company: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co
Filing Date: 2025-09-08
Form: SF-1
Chunk 46
---
 applicable requirements in the Wildfire Financing Law, other                                                            
 relevant provisions of California statutes, the financing order and any applicable regulations of the California commission to confirm that they met such requirements; |

| • |     | prepared and reviewed the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the bonds and compared                                                                                                                             
 such agreements to the applicable requirements in the Wildfire Financing Law, other relevant provisions of California statutes, the financing order and any applicable regulations of the California commission to confirm that they met such 
 requirements;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| • |     | reviewed the disclosure in this prospectus regarding the Wildfire Financing Law, other relevant provisions of                                                                                                                                      
 California statutes, the financing order and the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the bonds, and compared such descriptions to the relevant provisions of the Wildfire Financing Law, other relevant provisions of 
 California statutes, the financing order and such agreements to confirm the accuracy of such descriptions;                                                                                                                                         |

| • |     | consulted with legal counsel to assess if there is a basis upon which the bondholders (or the trustee acting on 
 their behalf) could successfully challenge the constitutionality of any legislative action by the               |

- 40 -

| State of California (including action by the California commission or the voters by amendment to the California Constitution) that could repeal or amend the provisions of the Wildfire Financing 
 Law in a way that could substantially impair the value of the recovery property, or substantially reduce, alter or impair the fixed recovery charges;                                             |

| • |     | reviewed the process and procedures in place for it, as servicer, to perform its obligations under the servicing                                                                                                                                                                  
 agreement, including billing, collecting, receiving and posting the fixed recovery charges to be provided for under the recovery property, forecasting fixed recovery charges, and preparing and submitting advice letters for true-up adjustments to the fixed recovery charges; |

| • |     | reviewed the operation of the true-up adjustment mechanism for adjusting                                                                                          
 fixed recovery charge levels to meet the scheduled payments on the bonds and in this context took into account its experience with the California commission; and |

| • |     | with the assistance of its advisors, prepared financial models in order to set the initial fixed recovery charges                                                                                     
 to be provided for under the recovery property at levels sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds when due and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the bonds. |

In connection with the preparation of such models, SCE:

| • |     | reviewed (i) the historical