Company: DEFI
Filing Date: 2025-03-27
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001999371-25-003249
Chunk: 60

Company: Tidal Commodities Trust I
Filing Date: 2025-03-27
Form: 424B3
Chunk 60
---
 financial institutions that engage in convertible virtual currency (“CVC”) transactions with CVC mixers. The proposed rule, if adopted, would require covered financial institutions to report to FinCEN any CVC transactions they process that involves CVC mixing within or involving a jurisdiction outside the United States. The term “CVC mixing” covers more than just transactions that involve CVC mixers like Tornado Cash, and seemingly could cover a broader range of conduct involving technologies, services, or methods that have the effect of obfuscating the source, destination, or amount of a CVC transaction, whether or not the obfuscation was intentional. If the rule were to be adopted as proposed and if the Bitcoin blockchain were to be deemed to or were to adopt features which come within the rule’s ambit, it could cause covered financial institutions – such as many virtual currency exchanges, or the Trust’s service providers, such as the Prime Execution Agent or the Cash Custodian – to reduce support for or cease offering services for bitcoin or to the Trust, which could impair the utility of bitcoin, the value of the Shares and the Trust's ability to operate in compliance with new laws and regulations.

Legal status of bitcoin.

The legal status of digital assets varies substantially across jurisdictions. In many countries, the bitcoin legal status is still undefined or changing. Some countries have deemed the usage of bitcoin illegal. Other countries have banned digital assets or securities or derivatives in respect to them (including for certain categories of investor), banned the local banks from working with digital assets or restricted the use of digital assets in other ways. Furthermore, the status of bitcoin remains undefined and there is uncertainty as to whether bitcoin assets are a security, money, a commodity or property. In some countries, such as the United States, different government agencies define digital assets differently, leading to regulatory conflict and uncertainty. This uncertainty is compounded by the rapid evolution of regulations. Countries may, in the future, explicitly restrict, outlaw or curtail the acquisition, use, trade or redemption of bitcoin. In such a scenario, there may be adverse effects on the value of bitcoin and the Fund’s Shares, including the termination of the Fund.

A determination that bitcoin or any other digital asset is a “security” may adversely affect the value of bitcoin and the value of the Shares, and result in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to, or termination of, the Fund.

Depending on its characteristics, a digital asset may be considered a “security” under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular digital asset