Company: RAIN
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-035587
Chunk: 57

Company: Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form: 424B3
Chunk 57
---

the asserted patents. However, RWT could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or invalidity arguments in its defense. In
the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the validity of a patent claim must present
clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the patent owner need only prove infringement
by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof. If a third party is able to obtain an injunction preventing us from
accessing such third-party intellectual property rights, or if RWT cannot modify its technology to make it non-infringing, or license
or develop alternative technology for any infringing aspect of our business, it may be forced to limit or stop sales of its products or
cease business activities related to such intellectual property. RWT cannot predict the outcome of lawsuits and cannot ensure that the
results of any such actions will not have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. Any intellectual
property litigation to which RWT might become a party, or for which it is required to provide indemnification, regardless of the merit
of the claim or its defenses, may require RWT to do one or more of the following:

| ● | cease selling or using technology that incorporates the intellectual                                              
 property rights that allegedly infringes, misappropriates or violates the intellectual property of a third party; |

| ● | make substantial payments for legal fees, settlement payments 
 or other costs or damages;                                    |

| ● | obtain a license, which may not be available on reasonable 
 terms or at all, to sell or use the relevant technology;   |

| ● | redesign the allegedly infringing technology to avoid infringement,                 
 misappropriation or violation, which could be costly, time-consuming or impossible; |

| ● | rebrand RWT or pursue a different trademark; or |

| ● | indemnify organizations using RWT’s platform or third-party 
 service providers.                                          |

Even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in RWT’s
favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of its management and harm its business
and operating results. Moreover, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings
or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect
on the price of RWT’s