Company: VEEAW
Filing Date: 2025-01-15
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-003888
Chunk: 67

Company: VEEA INC.
Filing Date: 2025-01-15
Form: 424B3
Chunk 67
---
 law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against Plum arising out of or relating in any way to the Warrant
Agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that Plum irrevocably submits to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction
shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. Plum will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and
that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing,
these provisions of the Warrant Agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act
or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person
or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of its Warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented
to the forum provisions in its Warrant Agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum provisions
of the Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (a “Foreign Action”) in the name of any holder of Warrants, such holder shall
be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection
with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “Enforcement Action”), and (y)
having service of process made upon such Warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such Warrant holder’s counsel
in the foreign action as agent for such Warrant holder.

This choice-of-forum provision
may limit a Warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with Plum’s,
which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of the Warrant Agreement inapplicable or unenforceable
with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, Plum may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations
and result in a diversion of the time and resources of its management and board of directors.

<div align='center'>31</div>

An active, liquid