Company: DRTSW
Filing Date: 2025-04-28
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-035799
Chunk: 49

Company: Alpha Tau Medical Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-04-28
Form: 424B5
Chunk 49
---
 in any action against us in any U.S. federal or state court arising
out of this offering or any purchase or sale of securities in connection with this offering. The address of our agent is 1 Union Street,
3rd Floor, Lawrence, MA 01840.

We have been informed by our
legal counsel in Israel, Meitar | Law Offices, that it may be difficult to initiate an action with respect to U.S. securities law
in original actions instituted in Israel or obtain a judgement based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities
laws. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel is not
the most appropriate forum to hear such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli
law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law
must be proved as a fact which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure may also be governed by Israeli
law.

Subject to specified time
limitations and legal procedures, Israeli courts may enforce a United States judgment in a civil matter which, subject to certain exceptions,
is non-appealable, including a judgment based upon the civil liability provisions of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and including
a monetary or compensatory judgment in a non-civil matter, providedthat, among other things:

| ● | the judgment is obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, according to the             
 laws of the state in which the judgment is given and the rules of private international law prevailing in Israel; |

| ● | the prevailing law of the foreign state in which the judgment is rendered allows for the enforcement of 
 judgments of Israeli courts;                                                                            |

| ● | adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be 
 heard and to present his or her evidence;                                                              |

| ● | the judgment is not contrary to public policy of Israel, and the enforcement of the civil liabilities 
 set forth in the judgment is not likely to impair the security or sovereignty of Israel;              |

| ● | the judgment was not obtained by fraud and does not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same 
 matter between the same parties;                                                                       |

| ● | an action between the same parties in the same matter was not pending in any Israeli court at the time 
 at which