Company: SPWH
Filing Date: 2025-04-02
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0000950170-25-048890
Chunk: 194

Company: SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-04-02
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1B
Chunk 194
---
 of federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to, among other things, protection of the environment, human health and safety, advertising, pricing, weights and measures, product safety and other matters. Some of these laws affect or restrict the manner in which we can sell certain items, such as archery equipment, handguns, smokeless powder, black powder substitutes, ammunition, pepper spray, bows, knives and other products. State and local laws and regulations governing hunting, fishing, boating, all-terrain vehicles and other outdoor activities and equipment can also affect our business. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the terms of such laws and that we have no liabilities under such laws that we expect could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. 

In addition, many of our imported products are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas that may limit the quantity of products that we may import into the United States from other countries or impact the cost of such products. To date, quotas in the operation of our business have not restricted us, and customs duties have not comprised a material portion of the total cost of our products. 

State, local, and federal laws and regulations relating to products that we sell may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political, economic or social events. For instance, in November 2022, Oregon passed a ballot measure that bans firearms and magazines with a capacity of over ten rounds, and that, among other things, imposes complex permitting and training requirements for the purchases of firearms.  On December 6, 2022, a state circuit court judge in Oregon temporarily blocked the enforcement of such legislation and later granted a permanent injunction on 

20

November 21, 2023. The measure was also being challenged in a related case in federal court and was on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. However, due to the recent ruling of a similar capacity restriction case in California (Duncan vs. Bonta), the Oregon federal court case will likely be remanded to the lower court. 

Recently, on March 12, 2025, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that the ballot measure is constitutional under Oregon's state constitution and gave the plaintiffs 35 days to appeal the decision.  As a result, sales of firearms in Oregon may be halted or substantially diminished until all permitting and training programs are fully developed by the state and/or law enforcement agencies. If that were to occur, it could result in a substantial decline in our sales of