Company: NOTV
Filing Date: 2025-02-06
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001628280-25-004178
Chunk: 146

Company: Inotiv, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-06
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part II, Item 8
Chunk 146
---
. Further, the Seventh Amendment included the addition of a maximum capital expenditure limit and a minimum EBITDA test effective as of the closing date for the testing periods of the six months ended December 31, 2024 and the nine months ended March 31, 2025, waived the existing financial covenants from the date of the Seventh Amendment until June 30, 2025, and established new testing ratios for the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and the Secured Leverage Ratio covenants for the fiscal 

37

quarters beginning June 30, 2025 and thereafter. The Seventh Amendment also capped the reinvestment of funds from extraordinary receipts and asset sales and casualty events at $5,000 in the aggregate, and established a non-voting third party observer to the Company’s board of directors meetings, as elected by the lenders. The Company was in compliance with the maximum capital expenditure limit and the minimum EBITDA test for the six months ended December 31, 2024. The maximum capital expenditure limit and the minimum EBITDA test were the only two applicable covenants under the Credit Agreement as of or for any period ended December 31, 2024. 

Our evaluation of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles entailed analyzing prospective fully implemented operating budgets and forecasts for expectations of our cash needs and comparing those needs to the current cash and cash equivalent balances in order to satisfy our obligations, including cash outflows for planned targeted capital expenditures, and to comply with minimum liquidity and financial covenant requirements under our debt covenants related to borrowings pursuant to its Credit Agreement for at least the next twelve months. This evaluation initially does not take into consideration the potential mitigating effect of management’s plans that have not been fully implemented and are outside of its control as of the date the condensed consolidated financial statements are issued. When substantial doubt exists under this methodology, we evaluate whether the mitigating effect of our plans sufficiently alleviates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of management’s plans, however, is only considered if both (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the condensed consolidated financial statements are issued, and (2) it is probable that the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these condensed consolidated financial statements are issued.