Company: G
Filing Date: 2025-11-14
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001140361-25-042317
Chunk: 21

Company: Genpact LTD
Filing Date: 2025-11-14
Form: 424B5
Chunk 21
---
 that may affect the value of the notes. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be revised, suspended or withdrawn by the rating agency at any time. Insolvency laws of England and Wales, Bermuda, Luxembourg or other local insolvency laws may limit the ability of holders of notes to enforce their rights or receive payment under the notes and the guarantees and may not be as favorable to you as those of another jurisdiction with which you may be familiar. The UK Co-Issuer is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, the Parent Guarantor is an exempted company organized under the laws of Bermuda and the Subsidiary Guarantor is a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée) organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar event, proceedings could be initiated in England and Wales, Bermuda, Luxembourg or any other relevant jurisdiction. The bankruptcy, insolvency, administrative and other laws of the Issuers’ and the jurisdictions of organization or incorporation of the Guarantors may be materially different from, or in conflict with, each other and those of the U.S. and other jurisdictions with which holders of the Notes may be familiar, including in the areas of rights of creditors, priority of governmental and other creditors, ability to obtain post-petition interest and duration of the proceeding. The application of these laws, or any conflict among them, could call into question whether any particular jurisdiction’s law should apply, adversely affect the ability to enforce the holder’s rights under the notes and the guarantees in those jurisdictions or limit any amounts that you may receive. Although laws differ among various jurisdictions, in general, under fraudulent conveyance and other laws, a court could subordinate or void the guarantees and, if payment has already been made under either of the guarantees, require that the recipient returns the payment to the Guarantor, if the court found that:

| • | the guarantees were granted with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or shareholders of the Guarantors or other person or, in certain jurisdictions, even when the recipient was simply aware that the Guarantors were insolvent when they granted the guarantees; |

| • | the guarantees were entered into without a legal obligation to do so, are prejudicial to the interests of the other creditors and both the Guarantors and the beneficiary of the guarantees were aware of or should have been aware of the fact that it was prejudicial