Company: YCY-WT
Filing Date: 2025-08-22
Form Type: S-1
Source: 0001213900-25-079440
Chunk: 67

Company: AA Mission Acquisition Corp. II
Filing Date: 2025-08-22
Form: S-1
Chunk 67
---
 be inapplicable if we are able to consummate an initial business combination. For additional information, please see “ Risk Factors — Since all of our directors and officers are based in or have significant ties to China, the Chinese government may have potential oversight and discretion over the conduct of our directors’ and officers’ search for a target company. The Chinese government may intervene or influence our operations at any time through our directors and officers who are based in or have significant ties in China, which could result in a material change in our search for a target business and/or the value of the securities we are offering. Changes in the policies, regulations, rules, and the enforcement of laws of the PRC government may be adopted quickly with little advance notice and could have a significant impact upon our ability to operate.”In addition, please also see “Risk Factors — The cash -flow structure of a post -acquisition company based in China or Hong Kong poses additional risks including, but not limited to, restrictions on foreign exchange and restrictions on our ability to transfer cash between entities, across borders, and to U.S. investors.” Enforcement of Civil Liabilities Our Chairperson of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Qing Sun, is a resident of mainland China. Our Chief Financial Officer and executive director, Shibin Fang, is a resident of mainland China. Directors Daoyong Xing, Zhenxing Wang and Wenzhong Zhao are residents of mainland China. As a result, legal claims against us or our executive officers and directors may be difficult or impossible for investors to pursue in U.S. courts. Moreover, even if an investor obtains a judgment in a U.S. court against one of our directors or officers, the investor may be unable to enforce such judgment on these directors and officers. It will equally be difficult to effect service of process upon us or those persons inside the PRC. PRC courts may only recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between the PRC and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. This is reflected in a number of bilateral treaties signed by the PRC, which provide that lack of jurisdiction of the judgment court can be a ground for refusal. Further, a foreign judgment cannot be recognized and enforced in the PRC if a Chinese court has rendered a judgment on the same subject matter or recognized and enforced another foreign judgment or arbitral award on the same subject matter. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law