Company: CGABL
Filing Date: 2025-09-17
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001193125-25-206326
Chunk: 16

Company: Carlyle Group Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-09-17
Form: 424B5
Chunk 16
---
 provisions of fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, which may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the notes or any guarantee could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if (1) the Issuer or any of the Guarantors, as applicable, issued the notes or incurred its guarantee with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (2) the Issuer or any of the Guarantors, as applicable, received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for issuing the notes or incurring its guarantee and, in the case of (2) only, one of the following is also true at the time thereof:

| • |     | the Issuer or any of the Guarantors, as applicable, were insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of the 
 issuance of the notes or the incurrence of the guarantees;                                                |

| • |     | the issuance of the notes or the incurrence of the guarantees left the Issuer or any of the Guarantors, as 
 applicable, with an unreasonably small amount of capital to carry on business; or                          |

| • |     | the Issuer or any of the Guarantors intended to, or believed that it would, incur debts beyond the Issuer’s 
 or such Guarantor’s ability to pay such debts as they mature.                                               |

A court would likely find that the Issuer or a Guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the notes or a guarantee if the Issuer or a Guarantor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the issuance of the notes or the applicable guarantee. As a general matter, value is given for a transfer or an obligation if in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or new or antecedent debt is secured or satisfied. We cannot be certain as to the standards a court would use to determine whether or not the Issuer or the Guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, that the issuance of the guarantees would not be further subordinated to the Issuer’s or any of the Guarantors’ other debt. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if at the time it incurred indebtedness:

| • |     | the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of all its 
 assets;                                                                                                     |

| • |     | the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required