Company: SHPH
Filing Date: 2025-01-24
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001493152-25-003508
Chunk: 81

Company: Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-01-24
Form: 424B3
Chunk 81
---
 and tolerability of new agents. Restrictions such as black box warnings and REMS (Risk Evaluation and Migration Strategies) are being applied to more new products over the past five years compared to the previous five years. These restrictions require physicians to be more careful in evaluating the use of newer agents and newer diagnostic tools to select the most appropriate patients for newer approved agents.

Many of the new agents are molecularly targeted therapies that are biologic in their development and manufacturing. The cost of the newer agents can be significant. For example, the cost for Avastin for one treatment course as a radiation sensitizer is estimated at $9,000-12,000 according to one Key Opinion Leader in the U.S. (Carl Schmidt, Consultant, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., Business Plan 2018). Recently, a CAR-T gene therapy from Novartis was launched with a yearly cost of $475,000. Further, as many private payors scrutinize the cost and appropriate use of newer drugs, they require physicians to provide justification through prior authorization requests, use of step therapy and guidelines that delay treatment, increase administrative costs and limit the therapeutic choices for physicians and hospitals.

| 56 |

Public payors for radiation oncology therapies such as CMS have instituted reimbursement reductions that potentially affect the overall cost of therapy and can limit the acceptance of newer agents. With CMS announced reductions in reimbursement for radiation oncology, there is increased pressure to find a more potent radiation sensitizer agent with reduced side effects, and greater cost-effectiveness.

Escalating healthcare spending is adding pressure on government and commercial payors to contain drug costs. While the oncology space is arguably not as tightly managed by payors as other therapeutic areas, utilization management of costly cancer therapeutics has become an increasing priority for U.S. payors, especially with the advent of biologics. Payors (and market access agencies in the EU) will most often restrict high-cost drugs, drugs with limited or no survival benefits, and drugs deemed to be at high risk for widespread off-label use.

Beyond efforts at cost containment by insurers (which often require patients to first be prescribed lower cost drugs to determine effectiveness prior to allowing for reimbursements for more expensive (or less cost effective) drugs), payors are also looking toward implementing clinical pathways as a way to maintain or improve health outcomes while lowering costs. Clinical pathways are designed to address the limitations of prior authorization and of reduced fee schedules, offering more durable cost containment to payors. These pathways may lead to cost savings by encouraging the use of