Company: TCMFF
Filing Date: 2025-05-19
Form Type: 6-K
Source: 0001104659-25-050264
Chunk: 81

Company: TELECOM ARGENTINA SA
Filing Date: 2025-05-19
Form: 6-K
Chunk 81
---
 Civil para su Defensa filed a claim against the Company seeking the reimbursement to all customers of
the amounts charged under the “2345-M Promotion”, as well as the imposition of a compensatory sanction on the terms of Section 52
of the Consumer Protection Law, alleging that the Company failed to provide sufficient information to consumers. However, the Company
declared that its actions complied with the standards set forth in the Consumer Protection Law, as the information provided on its website,
which the promotion referred to, was adequate and conformed to the applicable regulations.

The Company's Management and legal counsel believe
that TMA has strong arguments to defend its position and expect the claim to be dismissed. Therefore, no provision has been made in connection
with this claim. In the event that the final outcome of this matter is unfavorable to the Company, its Management and legal counsel estimate
that, based on the information available to date, the potential impact would amount to approximately 900 million pesos, as of December 31,
2024.

Línea Control 400 and 600

In 2007, TASA, a company now merged into TMA,
was sued by Asociación Unión de Usuarios y Consumidores (“Unión”) together with Asociación para la Defensa de Usuarios y Consumidores. The purpose of this claim is to have TASA maintain the 100% discount previously applied
to the “Bloqueo Línea Control 400” service, included in the business plan known as “Control 400”
(LC400), and also to obtain the reimbursement of the amounts charged to customers on such account.

On October 17, 2017, TASA was notified of
the first-instance decision, which ordered TASA to:
a) cease billing the “Bloqueo Línea Control 400” service to the subscribers of the “Línea Control 400” service;
b) reimburse customers for the amounts charged on account of the “Bloqueo Línea Control 400” service since July 2006,
with the corresponding interest on the terms of Section 31 of Law 24.240; and
c) pay a civil fine in favor of users under the terms of Sections 31 and 52 bis of such law. On October 20, 2017, TASA appealed the
judgment issued in both cases. The appeals were granted, and the cases were submitted to the Federal Court of Appeals on Administrative
Litigation Matters.

In September 201