Company: DGLY
Filing Date: 2025-08-18
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001641172-25-024667
Chunk: 43

Company: DIGITAL ALLY, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-08-18
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 1
Chunk 43
---
 December 27, 2022. Because Culp McAuley’s original counsel withdrew, Culp McAuley was
ordered to obtain new counsel on or before December 2, 2022. On December 5, 2022, the Court ordered that Culp McAuley show cause in writing
by December 21, 2022, why the Court should not direct the Clerk to enter default against it. On December 22, 2022, the Court directed
the Clerk to enter default against Culp McAuley. On February 21, 2023, the Clerk entered default against Culp McAuley.

In February and March, 2023,
defendants Larry Roberts and Mark Depew filed separate motions to dismiss, respectively. The Company opposed both motions. On July 7,
2023, the Court issued an Order granting Roberts’ motion to dismiss and denying Depew’s motion to dismiss. On December 7,
2023, the Company filed an application for the Clerk’s entry of default against defendant Brandon Culp. On December 13, 2023, the
Clerk entered default against Brandon Culp.

On January 5, 2024, the Company
filed a motion for summary judgment against defendants Campbell McAuley and Mark Depew. On the same date, the Company also filed separate
motions for default judgment against Culp McAuley and Brandon Culp, respectively. On January 5, 2024, defendant Mark Depew filed a motion
for summary judgment against the Company. On May 17, 2024, the Court issued Orders which, respectively, (i) granted defendant Mark Depew’s
motion for summary judgment against the Company; (ii) denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment against Depew; (iii) granted
the Company’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Campbell McAuley; and (iv) granted the Company’s motions for default
judgment against defendants Culp McAuley and Brandon Culp. Finding that defendants Brandon Culp and Campbell McAuley were each the alter
ego of Culp McAuley, on June 4, 2024, the Court entered judgment in favor of the Company in the amount of $3,999,984 against Culp McAuley,
Brandon Culp, and Campbell McAuley, jointly and severally (the “judgment”). The Company is currently uncertain as to what
amount, if any, of the