Company: SVREW
Filing Date: 2025-03-21
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001013762-25-001028
Chunk: 41

Company: SaverOne 2014 Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-03-21
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 41
---
 and the acquirer or the company published all required information with respect
to the tender offer prior to the tender offer’s response date.

In
addition, February 17, 2025, we further amended our Articles of Association to include provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover
proposals that shareholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors, and
an additional provision providing that such e staggered board provision would require the approval of holders of at least 75% of the
outstanding shares. These provisions may make it more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise
could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

Israeli
tax considerations also may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence does not
have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. See “ Item 10. E. Taxation - Israeli Tax Considerations
and Government Programs” for additional information.

It
may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a United States court against us and our officers and directors in Israel or the United States,
to assert United States securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on our officers and directors.

We
were incorporated in Israel. All of our executive officers and directors reside outside of the United States, and all of our assets and
most of the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or any of these
persons, including a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of the U. S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in
the United States and may not necessarily be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult to affect service of process on these
persons in the United States or to assert U. S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. Additionally, it may be
difficult for an investor, or any other person or entity, to initiate an action with respect to United States securities laws in Israel.
Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of United States securities laws reasoning that Israel is not
the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine
that Israeli law and not United States law is applicable to the claim. If United States law is found to be applicable, the content of
applicable United States law must be proven as