Company: MKDWW
Filing Date: 2025-03-13
Form Type: 424B4
Source: 0001493152-25-010187
Chunk: 49

Company: MKDWELL Tech Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-03-13
Form: 424B4
Chunk 49
---
 funds and other welfare-oriented payment obligations, and contribute to these plans based on the salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the relevant employees subject to any maximum amount of contribution specified by local authorities. If MKD does not make adequate employee benefit payments, it may be required to make up for the contributions due and to pay late fees and fines.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions against us or our management named in the prospectus based on China laws.

The Company is a company incorporated under the laws of the BVI, but MKD generates substantially all of its revenues from Mainland China and Taiwan and substantially all of its assets are located in Mainland China and Taiwan. In addition, Ms. Min-Jie Cui resides within China for a significant portion of the time and is a PRC national. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process upon us or those persons inside mainland China. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors as none of them currently resides in the U.S. or has substantial assets located in the U.S.

| 29 |

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. Mainland PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. Unless certain required conditions are fulfilled, claimants may face difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions against us or our management named in the prospectus based on China laws.

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigation or collect evidence.

The difficulty of cross-border supervision and administration is a problem in many countries, as well as in China. For example, in China, there may be legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside China. Although PRC government authorities may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the Unities States may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020