Company: IIIV
Filing Date: 2025-02-07
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001728688-25-000043
Chunk: 73

Company: i3 Verticals, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-07
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 1
Chunk 73
---
 seeks monetary damages for the cost of network remediation of $15,000 purportedly spent by the State and $7,000 purportedly spent by the Plaintiffs, return of purchase prices, potential additional expenses related to remediation and any obligation to notify parties of an alleged data breach as and if required by applicable law, and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The claimed damages relate to a third-party remote access software product used in connection with services provided by S&S to certain Louisiana law enforcement districts and alleged inadequacies in the Company’s cybersecurity practices. Plaintiffs moved to remand the action to state court on November 5, 2021, and the motion was referred to a magistrate to make a report and recommendation to the district court judge. On July 5, 2022, the magistrate recommended that the matter be remanded to state court. On July 19, 2022, the Company and all other defendants filed objections to the recommendation. On August 3, 2022, the Plaintiffs filed a response to those objections. On August 16, 2022, the district court granted the Plaintiffs’ motion to remand, and all Defendants appealed. Oral argument on this motion in front of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals took place on April 4, 2023, and on September 1, 2023, the Fifth Circuit panel affirmed the District Court order to remand the case back to state court. On September 29, 2023, all Defendants-Appellants filed a Petition for 

35

i3 VERTICALS, Inc.NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)(in thousands, except unit, share and per share amounts)

Rehearing En Banc, which the Plaintiffs-Appellees opposed on October 12, 2023. As a result of Defendants’ petition, the Fifth Circuit held its mandate, effectively staying the effective date of its decision, but the Fifth Circuit ultimately denied the petition for rehearing on February 22, 2024, sending the case back to the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, where the case remains pending.All Defendants have filed pleading-stage motions to dismiss, some of which were granted. The Court allowed plaintiffs to re-plead certain claims and has severed the claims brought by the Division of Administration from the claims brought by the parish Sheriffs and Districts. The Division of Administration chose not to re