Company: OSRH
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001213900-25-034116
Chunk: 380

Company: OSR Holdings, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-22
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 1A
Chunk 380
---
 expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our patents,
the patents of our licensors or our other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required
to file and prosecute legal claims against one or more third parties, which can be expensive and time-consuming, even if ultimately successful.
In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is not valid or is unenforceable,
or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in
question. As a result, we cannot predict with certainty how much protection, if any, will be given to our patents if we attempt to enforce
them and they are challenged in court. Further, even if we prevail against an infringer in U.S. district court, there is always the
risk that the infringer will file an appeal and the district court judgment will be overturned at the appeals court and/or that an adverse
decision will be issued by the appeals court relating to the validity or enforceability of our patents. An adverse result in any litigation
or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent
applications at risk of not issuing. The initiation of a claim against a third party may also cause the third party to bring counter claims
against us such as claims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant
counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to
meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement or lack of written description
or statutory subject matter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution
of the patent withheld relevant material information from the USPTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third
parties may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in post-grant proceedings such as ex parte reexaminations, inter
partes review, or post-grant review, or oppositions or similar proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with
litigation or even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable.
We