Company: HFFG
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form Type: DEF 14A
Source: 0001680873-25-000022
Chunk: 12

Company: HF Foods Group Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-25
Form: DEF 14A
Chunk 12
---
 matter. For each director nominee, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the applicable director nominee in Proposal No. 1, and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal No. 1.

• Ratification of the selection of BDO USA, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person, virtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the

<div align='center'>5</div>

selection of BDO USA, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal No. 2. We do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with respect to Proposal No. 2.

• Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person, virtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal No. 3 and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal No. 3.

An “ABSTAIN” vote represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. Given the requirement in our bylaws that a majority of the shares present in person, virtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on a proposal vote in favor of such proposal, an abstention on any proposal will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal.

Generally, “broker non-votes” occur when shares held by a broker in street name for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker (1) has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (2) lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares. A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. As a result, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with the ratification of