Company: AIRJW
Filing Date: 2025-05-05
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001213900-25-039770
Chunk: 57

Company: AirJoule Technologies Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-05-05
Form: 424B3
Chunk 57
---
 pursuant to the DGCL, our Charter or our Bylaws; or (iv) any action, suit or proceeding
asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine; and (b) subject to the foregoing, the federal district courts of the
United States of America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under
the Securities Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such forum selection provisions shall not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability
or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts of the United States have exclusive jurisdiction.
The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for
disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers,
and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Charter to be inapplicable
or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could
harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

<div align='center'>27</div>

Additionally, Section 22 of the Securities
Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the
Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As noted above, our Charter and our Bylaws will provide that the federal district
courts of the United States of America shall have jurisdiction over any action arising under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there
is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with
the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

We are an “emerging growth company.” The reduced public company reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We qualify as an “emerging growth company,”
as defined in the JOBS Act. While we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and plan to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure
requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These provisions include:

| 1) | an exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirement                                         
 in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, |

| 2) | not being required to