Company: GVH
Filing Date: 2025-10-01
Form Type: F-3
Source: 0001213900-25-094769
Chunk: 109

Company: Globavend Holdings Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-10-01
Form: F-3
Chunk 109
---
 or currency restrictions, and the availability of professional and support services. However, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States and provides less protection for investors. In addition, Cayman Islands companies do not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States.

We have appointed Cogency
Global Inc. as our agent to receive service of process with respect to any action brought against us in the United States in connection
with the offerings pursuant to this registration statement under the federal securities laws of the United States or of any state
in the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman, our counsel as to the laws of the Cayman Islands, has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands would (i) recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States, or (ii) entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

Conyers Dill & Pearman
has informed us that the courts of the Cayman Islands would recognise as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam
obtained in the foreign courts (other than judgements from certain Australian courts which are recognized under the Foreign Judgments
Reciprocal Enforcement Act (1996) Revision) against our Company under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable
in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain circumstances,
an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (a) such courts had
proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of
the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to
the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering
of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of
the Cayman Islands.

Substantially