Company: DRTSW
Filing Date: 2025-03-12
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001213900-25-023187
Chunk: 80

Company: Alpha Tau Medical Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-03-12
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 80
---
 our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage
our existing consultants or find other competent outside contractors and consultants on economically reasonable terms, or at all. If we
are not able to effectively expand our organization by hiring new employees and expanding our groups of consultants and contractors, or
we are not able to effectively build out new facilities to accommodate this expansion, we may not be able to successfully implement the
tasks necessary to further develop and commercialize our product candidates and, accordingly, may not achieve our research, development
and commercialization goals.

Expectations, regulations, and scrutiny
relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG) may impose additional costs and expose us to new risks.

There is an increasing focus
from certain investors, clients, regulators, employees and other key stakeholders or third parties concerning corporate responsibility,
specifically related to environmental, social and governance, or ESG, factors, including those relating to climate change, supply chain
matters, and human capital management. Such increased scrutiny may result in increased costs, increased risk of litigation, or reputational
damage relating to our ESG practices or performance, enhanced compliance or disclosure obligations, or other adverse impacts on our business,
financial condition or results of operations. For example, there is an increased emphasis on corporate responsibility ratings and a number
of third parties provide reports on companies in order to measure and assess corporate responsibility performance. In addition, the ESG
factors by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed are constantly evolving, which could result in greater
or conflicting expectations of us and cause us to undertake costly initiatives to satisfy such new criteria. Alternatively, if we are
unable to satisfy such new criteria or expectations, investors and other key stakeholders or third parties may conclude that our policies
with respect to corporate responsibility are inadequate. We risk damage to our brand and reputation if our corporate responsibility procedures
or standards do not meet the standards set by various constituencies. We may be required to make investments in matters related to ESG,
which could be significant and adversely impact our results of operations. Furthermore, if our competitors’ corporate responsibility
performance is perceived to be greater than ours, potential or current investors may elect to invest with our competitors instead. In
addition, if we communicate certain initiatives and goals regarding ESG matters, we could fail, or be perceived to fail, in our achievement
of such initiatives or goals, or we could be criticized for the scope of such initiatives or goals. If we fail to satisfy the