Company: DMRC
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001437749-25-034816
Chunk: 55

Company: Digimarc CORP
Filing Date: 2025-11-13
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 8
Chunk 55
---
 we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, were effective.

Changes in Controls

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

       32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.

Item 1.         Legal Proceedings.

On May 8, 2025, a class action lawsuit captioned Ullom v. Digimarc Corp., et al., No: 3:25-cv-00779-JR (the “Ullom Action”) was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. The complaint purports to assert claims against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of a putative class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s shares between May 2, 2024 and February 26, 2025 (the “class period”). The Ullom Action seeks to recover damages allegedly caused by purported misstatements and omissions regarding the renewal status of a commercial contract, claiming that these alleged misstatements and omissions artificially inflated the price paid for our common stock during the class period.

Subsequently, four derivative lawsuits were filed nominally on the Company’s behalf, including three in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon on August 29, 2025 (as amended September 2, 2025) (Franchi v. McCormack et al., No. 3:25-cv-01543-AN), October 7,