Company: FCO
Filing Date: 2025-01-10
Form Type: N-CSR
Source: 0001104659-25-002474
Chunk: 45

Company: ABRDN GLOBAL INCOME FUND, INC.
Filing Date: 2025-01-10
Form: N-CSR
Chunk 45
---
visory fees. The Board considered that the compensation paid to the Sub-Adviser was paid by the Investment Manager, accordingly that the retention of the Sub-Adviser did not increase the fees or expenses otherwise incurred by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board considered the fee comparisons in light of the differences in resources and costs required to manage the different types of accounts. In evaluating the Fund’s management fees, the Board took into account the complexity and quality of the investment management of the Fund. The Board also took into account management’s discussion of the Fund’s expenses, including the factors that impacted the Fund’s expenses. The Board also reviewed the profitability of the investment management relationship with the Fund to the Advisers, and received information on the profitability of the Fund’s other contractual relationships with the Investment Manager, Sub-Adviser and their affiliates. The Board determined that the cost of services provided and profits realized by the Advisers were reasonable in light of the services provided by the Advisers to the Fund under the Advisory Agreements. The nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Agreements. The Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Advisers to the Fund and the resources dedicated to the Fund by the Advisers. The Directors took into account the Advisers’ investment experience and considered the allocation of responsibilities between the Advisers. The Board also considered the Advisers’ risk management processes. The Board considered the background and experience of the Advisers’ senior management personnel and the qualifications, background and responsibilities of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management services for the Fund. The Board also considered the financial condition of the Advisers and the Advisers’ ability to provide quality services to the Fund. Management reported on, among other things, its business plans and organizational structures. The Board considered the Advisers’ risk management processes. The Directors noted that they received information on a regular basis from the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer regarding the Advisers’ compliance policies and procedures and considered the Advisers’ brokerage policies and practices. The Directors took into account the Advisers’ investment experience and considered information regarding the Advisers’ compliance with applicable laws and Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory inquiries or audits of the Fund and/or the Advisers. In determining that the nature, extent and quality

| abrdn Global Income Fund, Inc. | 41 |

Supplemental Information (Unaudited) (concluded) of the services provided to the Fund were adequate and