Company: GIGGU
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001193125-25-277896
Chunk: 191

Company: GigCapital7 Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form: S-4
Chunk 191
---
 that would have a material impact on GigCapital7’s shareholders are required prior to the vote on the Business Combination Proposal.

GigCapital7 may be targeted by securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the Business Combination from being completed.

Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into business combination agreements. Even if the lawsuits are without merit, defending against these

claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on GigCapital7’s liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the Business Combination, then that injunction may delay or prevent the Business Combination from being completed, or from being completed within the expected timeframe, which may adversely affect GigCapital7’s and Hadron Energy’s respective businesses, financial condition and results of operation.

GigCapital7’s shareholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against GigCapital7 upon redemption of their shares to the extent of distributions received by them.

If GigCapital7 is forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it were proved that immediately following the date on which the distribution was made, GigCapital7 was unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by GigCapital7’s shareholders. Furthermore, GigCapital7’s directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to GigCapital7 or its creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and GigCapital7 to claims, by paying Public Shareholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. GigCapital7 cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against it for these reasons. GigCapital7 and its directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized or permitted any distribution to be paid out of GigCapital7’s share premium account while it was unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offense and may be liable to a fine and to imprisonment for five years in the Cayman Islands.

The terms of the GigCapital7 Warrants may be amended in a manner that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants.

The GigCapital7 Warrants were issued