Company: BLLN
Filing Date: 2025-09-17
Form Type: DRS/A
Source: 0001193125-25-206347
Chunk: 299

Company: BillionToOne, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-09-17
Form: DRS/A
Chunk 299
---
 capital stock, no member of our Board of Directors may be removed from office by our stockholders except for cause and, in addition to any other vote required by law, upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the voting power of our then-outstanding capital stock.

Stockholders not entitled to cumulative voting

Our Post-IPO Certificate of Incorporation will not permit stockholders to cumulate their votes in the election of
directors.

Choice of forum

Upon the completion of this offering,
our Post-IPO Certificate of Incorporation will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action
asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the DGCL, our Post-IPO Certificate of Incorporation or our Post-IPO
Bylaws or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Our Post-IPO Certificate of Incorporation will also provide that the U.S. federal district courts will be
the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

Some companies that adopted a similar federal district
court forum selection provision were subject to a suit in the Chancery Court of Delaware by stockholders who asserted that the provision is not enforceable. While the Delaware Supreme Court held that such federal district court forum selection
provision was in fact valid, there can be no assurance that federal courts or other state courts will follow the holding of the Delaware Supreme Court or determine that the our federal district court forum selection provision should be enforced in a
particular case.

These choice of forum provisions do not apply to actions brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. We intend for the
choice of forum provision regarding claims arising under the Securities Act to apply despite the fact that Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all actions brought to enforce any
duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision with respect to claims under the Securities Act, and our stockholders will not be deemed
to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

These exclusive forum provisions may limit the ability of
our stockholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such stockholders find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may