Company: MKDWW
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001641172-25-004780
Chunk: 32

Company: MKDWELL Tech Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-04-15
Form: 424B3
Chunk 32
---
 products to market or succeed in selling them into new customer applications in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Products or technologies developed by other companies may render MKD’s products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive and, since MKD creates products primarily for the vehicle electronics and camper products industries, this may have a greater effect on MKD than it would if it were a broader manufacturer with a wider range of product types and technologies. Many of MKD’s competitors are larger and more established international companies with greater engineering and research and development resources than MKD. MKD’s failure to identify or capitalize on any fundamental shifts in technologies in MKD’s product markets, relative to MKD’s competitors, could harm MKD’s business, have a material adverse effect on MKD’s competitive position within MKD’s industry and harm MKD’s relationships with MKD’s customers. In addition, to remain competitive, MKD must continue to innovate, improve manufacturing yields and expand MKD’s sales. MKD may not be able to accomplish these goals, which could harm MKD’s business.

| 19 |

MKD may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or demands that MKD license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense and reduction in MKD’s intellectual property rights.

The industries MKD serves are characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties may assert, patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to MKD’s business and have demanded, and may in the future demand, that MKD license its patents and technology. Any litigation to determine the validity of allegations that MKD’s products infringe or may infringe these rights, including claims arising through MKD’s contractual indemnification of MKD’s customers, or claims challenging the validity of MKD’s patents, regardless of its merit or resolution, could be costly and divert the efforts and attention of MKD’s management and technical personnel. MKD may not prevail in litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If litigation results in an adverse ruling, MKD could be required to:

| ● | pay                                                                                                                               
 substantial damages for past, present and future use of the infringing technology;                                                |
| ● | cease                                                                                                                             
 the manufacture, use or sale of infringing products;                                                                              |
| ● | discontinue                                                                                                                       
 the use of infringing technology;                                                                                                 |
| ● | expend                                                                                                                            
 significant resources to develop non-infr