Company: CCIXW
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form Type: S-4/A
Source: 0001193125-25-309933
Chunk: 209

Company: Churchill Capital Corp IX/Cayman
Filing Date: 2025-12-05
Form: S-4/A
Chunk 209
---
 to effect service of process within the United States upon members of the CCIX Board or CCIX’s executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the U.S. courts against members of the CCIX Board or CCIX’s officers.

<div align='center'>113</div>

Until the Domestication is effected, CCIX’s corporate affairs are governed by the CCIX current articles of association, the Companies Act and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We are also subject to the federal securities laws of the United States. The rights of shareholders to take action against members of the CCIX Board, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of members of the CCIX Board to CCIX under the laws of the Cayman Islands are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law in the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands and from English common law. Appeals from the Cayman Islands Courts to the Privy Council (which is the final Court of Appeal for British overseas territories such as the Cayman Islands) are binding on courts in the Cayman Islands. Decisions of the English courts, and particularly the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal are generally of persuasive authority but are not binding in the courts of the Cayman Islands. Decisions of courts in other Commonwealth jurisdictions are similarly of persuasive but not binding authority. The rights of CCIX’s shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of members of the CCIX Board under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

CCIX has been advised by Ogier (Cayman) LLP, its Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (1) to recognize or enforce against CCIX judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (2) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against CCIX predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the