Company: OTSA
Filing Date: 2025-06-09
Form Type: F-1
Source: 0001213900-25-052720
Chunk: 198

Company: OTSAW Ltd
Filing Date: 2025-06-09
Form: F-1
Chunk 198
---
 both healthcare and commercial spaces; •The TransCar AGV faces varied and intense competitive landscape that includes various major sizeable robotics and automation solutions companies globally, principal competitors include Oppent S.P.A., Oceaneering International, Inc., Aetheon Inc., Mobile Industrial Robots ApS, DS Automation Ltd., MLR System GmBH, and JBT Corporation. We believe that the TransCar AGV is able to stand out from similar products of our competitors because it is multifunctional and is able to handle food, medication, linen and sterile equipment deliveries. •Our Camello +AMR competes with other ground -basedunmanned delivery vehicles offered by its principal competitors, such as Starship Technologies, Kiwi Campus Inc., and Ottonomy.io. We believe that Camello +is able to stand out from similar products of our competitors because of its modular capabilities, allowing it to be adapted for different use cases, from basic last mile logistics to critical healthcare deliveries. We believe that our AMRs and robotic solutions will augment and enhance human labor. As such, our primary competition will still be traditional modes of human labor, such as traditional facilities management service providers which provide security services, disinfection services, logistics services, and last -mileor intra -facilitydelivery services. However, these facilities management service providers may also be our potential customers. To overcome potential resistance to technology and to establish a positive industry perception of AMR and robot -enhancedfacilities management services, we will continuously demonstrate to our customers, particularly those who are cost -sensitive, the value proposition and the cost -efficiencyof our products in comparison to traditional labor — increased productivity, freeing labor by allowing human to focus on higher -valueworks, reduction of cost and reliance on human capital, and the enhanced reliability of robots to reduce human error. We expect that we will compete on the following factors: •technological, product, and software innovation; •product quality, reliability and safety; •product features and performance; •product pricing; •production capacity, hence efficiency and economies of scales; •brand name recognition; •customer service and product support; and •existing customer relationships. We believe we do and will compete favorably on these factors; however, our potential competitors may have greater financial, technical, manufacturing and other resources than we have. Our competitors may be able to deploy greater resources for the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sales, marketing and support of their products. Additionally, our competitors may have greater name recognition