Company: RMIX
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001104659-25-110488
Chunk: 255

Company: Suncrete, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form: S-4
Chunk 255
---
 may not have properly valued Suncrete’s business and did not obtain a fairness opinion to assist in its analysis. For more information, see “Questions and Answers About the Business Combination — Did the Haymaker Board obtain a third-party fairness opinion in determining whether or not to proceed with the Business Combination? ”

•

#### Shareholder Vote
. The risk that Haymaker’s shareholders may fail to provide the respective votes necessary to effect the Business Combination.

•

#### Closing Conditions
. The fact that completion of the Business Combination is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain closing conditions that are not within Haymaker’s control.

•

#### Litigation
. The possibility of litigation challenging the Business Combination or that an adverse judgment granting permanent injunctive relief could indefinitely enjoin consummation of the Business Combination.

•

#### Fees and Expenses
. The fees and expenses associated with completing the Business Combination.

<div align='center'>132</div>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

#### Regulatory Risks
. Suncrete markets and sells products that are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and other government agencies, and its activities are subject to certain requirements under the Environmental Protection Act and other applicable laws. Suncrete’s failure to meet those requirements could cause New Suncrete to cease certain of its business activities and may involve the payment of financial penalties.

•

#### Other Risks
. Various other risks associated with the Business Combination, the business of Haymaker and the business of Suncrete described under the section titled “ Risk Factors ” of this document.

The Haymaker Board concluded that the potential benefits that it expected Haymaker and its shareholders to achieve as a result of the Business Combination outweighed the potentially negative factors associated with the Business Combination. Accordingly, the Haymaker Board unanimously determined, based on its consideration of the specific factors listed above, that the Business Combination Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Business Combination, and the consideration to be paid by Haymaker in the Business Combination, were advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Haymaker and its shareholders.

### Summary of Haymaker’s Financial and Valuation Analysis

### Certain Unaudited Suncrete Prospective Financial Information
In connection with Haymaker’s due diligence and consideration of the Business Combination, Suncrete’s management prepared and provided Haymaker with certain financial projections for Suncrete for the calendar years 2025 through 2026, which are summarized below (the “Suncrete Projections”).

The Suncrete Projections were not prepared with a view toward compliance with GAAP, published guidelines of the SEC or