Company: JUPGF
Filing Date: 2025-08-27
Form Type: DRS/A
Source: 0001493152-25-012379
Chunk: 89

Company: ATLAS CRITICAL MINERALS Corp
Filing Date: 2025-08-27
Form: DRS/A
Chunk 89
---
 |     |    | 1 |     |    | 1 |     |   | 53 |     |    | 4 |
| AVERAGE |     |       | 3 |     |                              | 266 |     |    | 73 |     |    | 11 |     |    | 2 |     |    | 1,050 |     |    | 360 |     |    | 35 |     |    | 4 |     |    |  8 |     |    | 22 |     |    | 2 |     |    | 0 |     |    | 1 |     |   | 42 |     |    | 3 |

Table 20 – Average of surface samples results (ppm) per individual rare earth element for each block - Scandium (Sc) and Promethium (Pm) were not considered in the results above.

<div align='center'>Figure 33 – Section showing three auger drill holes (DHT-001, -002 and -003), with representative results at specific depths.</div>

| 77 |

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

We have utilized Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) methodologies under the supervision of a qualified person as defined in Regulation S-K 1300.

In particular, as described above, we carried out a surface sampling and an auger drilling campaign, aiming to identify and delineate geochemical anomalies associated with rare earth mineralization. The surface sampling campaign included soil and chip rock samples of all lithology and layers across our mineral rights. The auger drilling campaign tested possible targets to evaluate the mineralization potential. Both campaigns had all geochemical analysis performed by SGS-Geosol, an analytical laboratory located in Vespasiano, Brazil, which is considered to be the premier such testing site in Brazil (“SGS-Geosol”). SGS-Geosol is ISO 14001 and 17025 accredited by the Standards Council. SGS-Geosol is an independent third-party and provides services pursuant to arms-length contracts.

The auger drillholes were vertical and the reported intervals corresponded to the true thickness. The cores were placed in boxes, aligned and measured by the technician or geologist for core recovery. The core boxes were identified with a code, a hole ID and tags. The logging and sampling were performed at our core logging facilities. The sample intervals were defined by 1 meter, varying depending on the lith