Company: COPL-UN
Filing Date: 2025-04-01
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001829126-25-002247
Chunk: 147

Company: Copley Acquisition Corp
Filing Date: 2025-04-01
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 147
---
 the overall company, and cronyism. The lack of transparency and ambiguity in the regulatory process also may result in inadequate credit evaluation and weakness that may precipitate or encourage financial crisis. In our evaluation of a business combination we will have to evaluate the corporate governance of a target and the business environment, and in accordance with United States laws for reporting companies take steps to implement practices that will cause compliance with all applicable rules and accounting practices. Notwithstanding these intended efforts, there may be endemic practices and local laws that could add risk to an investment we ultimately make and that result in an adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments, or bringing actions in the PRC against us or our management and directors named in the prospectus based on foreign laws. It may also be difficult for you or overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within the PRC.

Our directors and officers are located in Hong Kong, with significant ties to Hong Kong and, to a lesser degree, the PRC generally. Among other aspects, most of our directors have spent a significant portion of their career in Hong Kong. See “Management — Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers.” for detailed disclosure of the biographies of our directors and officers as well as their ties to the PRC. In addition, following completion of an initial business combination, we may remain a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and some of the post-combined company’s officers and directors may reside in the PRC. As a result, it may be difficult for you effect service of process upon us or those persons residing in the PRC. Even with service of process, it may also be difficult to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against these officers and directors in the PRC.

<div align='center'>90</div>

In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws or those of any U.S. state. The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have