Company: WBI
Filing Date: 2025-08-04
Form Type: DRS/A
Source: 0000950123-25-006924
Chunk: 211

Company: WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
Filing Date: 2025-08-04
Form: DRS/A
Chunk 211
---
 Water Act (“SDWA”), as well as analogous state laws and regulations. Under the SDWA, the EPA established the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program, which sets minimum requirements for state and local programs regulating underground injection activities. The UIC program includes requirements for permitting, testing, monitoring, record keeping and reporting of injection activities, as well as a prohibition against the migration of fluid containing any contaminant into underground sources of drinking water. State regulations require us to obtain a permit from the applicable regulatory agencies to operate our produced water handling facilities. We believe that we have obtained the necessary permits from these agencies for our underground injection wells and that we are in substantial compliance with permit conditions and state rules.

Although we monitor the disposal process of produced water, any potential leakage from the subsurface portions of our produced water handling facilities could cause degradation of fresh groundwater resources, potentially resulting in suspension or revocation of our UIC permit, issuance of fines and penalties from governmental agencies, incurrence of expenditures for remediation of the affected resource and imposition of liability by third-parties for contamination, natural resource damage, property damages and personal injuries. Also, some states have considered laws mandating the recycling of produced water. Our business is designed to take advantage of the increased use of recycling and reuse trends that may change existing industry dynamics, providing our business with increased flexibility and strengthening our competitive position.

Some experts have concluded that the injection of produced water into certain underground formations may trigger seismic activity. In March 2016, the U.S. Geological Survey identified six states with the most significant hazards from induced seismicity, including Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico and Arkansas. In response to these concerns, some federal and state agencies are investigating whether disposed wells have caused increased seismic activity. Also, regulators in some states, including Texas and Oklahoma, have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, additional requirements related to seismic safety, including imposing certain restrictions on the

<div align='center'>150</div>

permitting of disposed wells or otherwise to assess any relationship between seismicity and the use of disposed wells, which has resulted in some states restricting, suspending or shutting down the use of such injection wells temporarily or permanently. We continue to pursue alternative technologies to disposal, including desalination and recycling technologies, which we believe will be a critical part of the future of produced water handling, particularly in regions that are likely to experience increased regulation of water use and produced water handling activities.

Water Discharges

The Clean Water Act (“CWA”), Oil Pollution