Company: NCEL
Filing Date: 2025-06-09
Form Type: F-4/A
Source: 0001213900-25-052354
Chunk: 512

Company: NewcelX Ltd.
Filing Date: 2025-06-09
Form: F-4/A
Chunk 512
---
). If a shareholder opts to be represented by another registered shareholder or a third party (who need not be a shareholder), the completed and wet ink signed proxy card should be sent directly to the address of the designated representative. Such designated representative may only cast a shareholder’s vote by providing the original wet ink signed proxy card at the NLS Meeting which explicitly names the registered shareholder or third party as its designated representative. If a shareholder grants a proxy, it may still vote its shares itself if it revokes its proxy before the NLS Meeting. A shareholder may also change its vote by entering a new vote by Internet, submitting a later -datedproxy. With the representation by the independent proxy or a third party, a shareholder has no additional right of physical attendance at the NLS Meeting. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS Following completion of the Merger, NLS is expected to qualify as a “foreign private issuer” under the rules and regulations of the SEC. As a foreign private issuer, NLS will be exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that would otherwise apply if NLS were a company incorporated in the United States or did not meet the other conditions to qualify as a foreign private issuer, including the requirement to file proxy solicitation materials on Schedule 14A in connection with annual or extraordinary general meetings of its security holders. For more information, see “ Matters Being Submitted To A Vote Of NLS Shareholders.” 310 ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITY Enforceability of civil liability of NLS, its directors and executive officers We are incorporated under the laws of Switzerland and our registered office and domicile is located in Kloten (Zurich), Switzerland. Moreover, a majority of our directors and executive officers are not residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or upon such persons or to enforce against them judgments obtained in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. We have been advised by our Swiss counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Switzerland of original actions, or in actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of civil liabilities to the extent predicated upon the federal and state securities laws of the United States. Original actions against persons in Switzerland based solely upon the U.S. federal or state securities laws are governed, among other things, by