Company: NAZ
Filing Date: 2025-11-06
Form Type: N-CSR
Source: 0001193125-25-269465
Chunk: 196

Company: NUVEEN ARIZONA QUALITY MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND
Filing Date: 2025-11-06
Form: N-CSR
Chunk 196
---
 Funds. The Board’s considerations regarding the comparative fee data for each Fund are set forth below:

| • |     | For Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median. In its review, the Board, however, also considered, among other things, the composition of the Expense Universe, which was comprised of a small peer set with only two of the peers unaffiliated with Nuveen funds. |

| • |     | For Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate was above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate matched and the net total expense ratio was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate matched, the actual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) and the net total expense ratio was below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New Jersey Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate and net total expense ratio were each above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median. In its review, the Board, however, considered, among other things, that there was only one peer other than the Fund in the Expense Universe. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate was above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate was slightly above (within 5 basis points) the Expense Universe median, and the Fund’s net total expense ratio was below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate and net total expense ratio were each below the Expense Universe median. |

| • |     | For Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund, although the Fund’s actual management fee rate was above the Expense Universe median, the Fund’s contractual management fee rate and net total expense ratio were slightly above (