Company: LRHC
Filing Date: 2025-11-19
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001213900-25-112656
Chunk: 104

Company: La Rosa Holdings Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-11-19
Form: 10-Q
Item: Item 1
Chunk 104
---
 putative
national class action complaint against La Rosa Realty, LLC in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division.
Ms. Palmer alleges that she received two (2) brief pre-recorded calls one week apart to her cell phone from La Rosa Realty, LLC presenting
her an employment opportunity as a real estate agent. Ms. Palmer seeks an undisclosed amount of monetary damages from La Rosa Realty,
LLC for the alleged would-be injurious, isolated and opportunistic employment gestures to her through a purported nationwide class action.
Ms. Palmer claims that the defendant violated her privacy, annoyed and harassed her, constituted a nuisance, and occupied her telephone
line. On March 12, 2024, La Rosa Realty, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the case with prejudice. The action settled at mediation and was
dismissed on May 20, 2025 without prejudice pending completion of the settlement terms.

As previously disclosed, on March 5, 2025, Joshua Epstein filed an action
in Osceola County, Florida Circuit Court alleging claims for Breach of Contract, Promissory Estoppel, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment, Breach
of Good Faith and Fair Dealings, Fraud in the Inducement, and to recover alleged unpaid compensation from the defendant, La Rosa Holdings
Corp. Original partial mediation occurred on September 5, 2025, then was reset for December 2, 2025. The Company denies the merits of
the claims and intends on vigorously defending the litigation.

As previously disclosed, on June 5, 2025, an employee, who served as our
Senior Human Resources and Payroll Specialist from July 10, 2024 to August 19, 2024, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the
Circuit Court of Osceola County, Florida. The employee is seeking a jury trial claiming $50,000 in damages and that the Company terminated
her employment in violation of SS 448.102(3). On July 9, 2025, the Company responded to the complaint with its Answer and Affirmative
Defenses, effectively denying all of the plaintiff’s claims. The case remains pending.

The
Company believes that the above claims are without merit, and it will vigorously defend against such claims. Moreover, these claims,
in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, business, or results of operations,
should the Company’s defense not be successful in