Company: RMIX
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form Type: S-4
Source: 0001104659-25-110488
Chunk: 269

Company: Suncrete, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-11-12
Form: S-4
Chunk 269
---
 directors and officers may be incentivized to complete the Business Combination, or an alternative initial business combination, with a less favorable company or on terms less favorable to shareholders, rather than to liquidate, which would cause the Sponsor to lose its entire investment. As a result, the Sponsor may have a conflict of interest in determining whether Suncrete is an appropriate business with which to complete a business combination and/or in evaluating the terms of the Business Combination;

•

the fact that the Sponsor and Haymaker’s officers and directors (or their affiliates) have made, and may make in the future, working capital and extension loans to Haymaker. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, the Sponsor has loaned an aggregate of approximately $1,880,000 to Haymaker under unsecured promissory notes to fund operating and transaction expenses in connection with the Business Combination and fund payments into the Trust Account, in accordance with the Existing Organizational Documents, to extend the date by which Haymaker must consummate an initial business combination, and may make additional loans after the date of this proxy statement/prospectus for such purposes. If the Business Combination is not consummated and another business combination is not otherwise completed, these working capital loans may not be repaid and would be forgiven except to the extent there are funds available to Haymaker outside of the Trust Account;

•

the fact that pursuant to the Existing Organizational Documents, Haymaker has renounced any interest or expectancy of Haymaker in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for both the Company and any individual serving as a director or officer of Haymaker, about which any such director or officer acquires knowledge. In the course of their other business activities, Haymaker’s officers and directors may have become aware of other investment and business opportunities which might have been appropriate for presentation to Haymaker as well as the other entities with which they were affiliated. Haymaker’s management had pre-existing fiduciary duties and contractual obligations and if there was a conflict of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented, any entity with whom Haymaker’s management had a pre-existing fiduciary obligation would have been presented the opportunity before Haymaker was presented with it. Haymaker does not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of Haymaker’s officers or directors materially affected Haymaker’s search for a business combination, including the negotiation or recommendation thereof or the provision of advice in connection therewith