Company: UAA
Filing Date: 2025-02-06
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001336917-25-000016
Chunk: 49

Company: Under Armour, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-06
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 1
Chunk 49
---
 securities cases previously filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the "District Court") were consolidated under the caption In re Under Armour Securities Litigation, Case No. 17-cv-00388-RDB (the "Consolidated Securities Action"). On September 14, 2020, the District Court issued an order that, among other things, consolidated two additional securities cases into the Consolidated Securities Action.The operative complaint (the "TAC") in the Consolidated Securities Action was filed on October 14, 2020. The class period identified in the TAC was September 16, 2015 through November 1, 2019.On June 20, 2024, the defendants reached an agreement with the plaintiffs to enter into a settlement resolving the Consolidated Securities Action (the “Securities Action Settlement”). Under the terms of the Securities Action Settlement, the Company paid $434 million to the members of the class, which was funded using balance sheet cash together with $63 million of insurance proceeds. In addition, the Company agreed to two additional, non-monetary provisions, specifically to continue to separate the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer for a period of at least three years beginning on the date that the court order approving the Securities Action Settlement and dismissing the Consolidated Securities Action becomes final and non-appealable (the “Three-Year Period”), and that all restricted stock or restricted stock units granted by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer during the Three-Year Period include a performance-based vesting condition to be set by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. In exchange, the plaintiffs and the Class granted customary releases in favor of Defendants of all of their claims that were or could have been asserted in the Consolidated Securities Action.On November 7, 2024, the District Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the Securities Action Settlement and dismissed the Consolidated Securities Action with prejudice. By entering into the Securities Action Settlement, the defendants in no way conceded or admitted liability for any of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the Consolidated Securities Action. The defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims asserted in the Consolidated Securities Action, and entered into the Securities Action Settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, risk, costs, and burdens inherent in any litigation, including the Consolidated Securities Action.Consolidated Kenney Derivative LitigationIn June and July