Company: SERV
Filing Date: 2025-01-07
Form Type: 424B5
Source: 0001213900-25-001654
Chunk: 40

Company: Serve Robotics Inc. /DE/
Filing Date: 2025-01-07
Form: 424B5
Chunk 40
---
          
 or agent of ours; (c) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against us or any          
 current or former director, officer or employee of ours arising out of or pursuant to, or         
 seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, or to interpret, apply or determine     
 the validity of, any provision of the DGCL, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation 
 or the amended and restated bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time); (d) any action,    
 suit or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of          
 the State of Delaware or (e) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against us          
 or any current or former director, officer or employee of ours governed by the internal affairs   
 doctrine, in all cases subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the               
 indispensable parties named as defendants. However, such forum selection provisions will          
 not apply to actions, suits or proceedings brought to enforce any liability or duty created       
 by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts of the United States          
 have exclusive jurisdiction. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides  
 that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal          
 district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution    
 of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.                    |

<div align='center'>10</div>

Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. As noted above, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the federal district courts of the United States will have exclusive jurisdiction over any action asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As noted above, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the choice of forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Accordingly, actions