Company: SYY
Filing Date: 2025-02-18
Form Type: 424B2
Source: 0001193125-25-028023
Chunk: 16

Company: SYSCO CORP
Filing Date: 2025-02-18
Form: 424B2
Chunk 16
---
 bankruptcy is not involved, were commenced at some future date by, or on behalf of, the unpaid creditors of a guarantor. Under the federal bankruptcy laws and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, a court may avoid or otherwise decline to enforce a subsidiary guarantee or may subordinate the notes or such guarantee to the applicable subsidiary guarantor’s existing and future indebtedness. While the relevant laws may vary from state to state, a court might take such actions if it found that when the applicable subsidiary guarantor entered into its guarantee the applicable subsidiary guarantor received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration and:

| • |     | was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of such incurrence; |

| • |     | was engaged in a business or transaction for which its remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; 
 or                                                                                                              |

| • |     | intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. |

A court would likely find that a subsidiary guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for such guarantee if such subsidiary guarantor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the issuance of such guarantee. The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent transfer laws vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer has occurred. Generally, however, a subsidiary guarantor would be considered insolvent if:

| • |     | the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of its assets; |

| • |     | the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable 
 liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or         |

| • |     | it could not pay its debts as they become due. |

A court might also avoid a guarantee, without regard to the above factors, if the court found that the applicable subsidiary guarantor entered into its guarantee with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud its creditors. In addition, any payment by a subsidiary guarantor pursuant to its guarantee could be avoided and S-7

required to be returned to such subsidiary guarantor or to a fund for the benefit of such guarantor’s creditors, and, accordingly, the court might direct you to repay any amounts that you
had already received from such subsidiary guarantor.

To the extent a court avoids a subsidiary guarantee as a fraudulent transfer or
holds a subsidiary guarantee unenforceable