Company: GGT-PG
Filing Date: 2025-03-10
Form Type: N-CSR
Source: 0001829126-25-001664
Chunk: 122

Company: GABELLI MULTIMEDIA TRUST INC.
Filing Date: 2025-03-10
Form: N-CSR
Chunk 122
---
 firms using the services at Broadridge: |

Broadridge is notified that we wish to vote in person. Broadridge issues individual legal proxies and sends them back via email or overnight (or the Adviser can pay messenger charges). A lead-time of at least two weeks prior to the meeting is needed to do this. Alternatively, the procedures detailed below for banks not using Broadridge may be implemented.

| ● | Banks and brokerage firms issuing proxies directly: |

The bank is called and/or faxed and a legal proxy is requested.

All legal proxies should appoint:

“Representative of [Adviser name] with full power of substitution.”

b) The legal proxies are given to the person attending the meeting along with the limited power of attorney.

Amended: November 11, 2024

<div align='center'>Appendix A

Proxy Guidelines

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

General Policy Statement</div>

It is the policy of GAMCO Investors, Inc, and its affiliated advisers (collectively “the Advisers”) to vote in the best economic interests of our clients. As we state in our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights, established in May 1988, we are neither fornor againstmanagement. We are for shareholders.

At our first proxy committee meeting in 1989, it was decided that each proxy statement should be evaluated on its own merits within the framework first established by our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights. The attached guidelines serve to enhance that broad framework.

We do not consider any issue routine. We take into consideration all of our research on the company, its directors, and their short and long-term goals for the company. In cases where issues that we generally do not approve of are combined with other issues, the negative aspects of the issues will be factored into the evaluation of the overall proposals but will not necessitate a vote in opposition to the overall proposals.

<div align='center'>Board of Directors</div>

We do not consider the election of the Board of Directors a routine issue. Each slate of directors is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Factors taken into consideration include:

| ● | Historical responsiveness to shareholders |

This may include such areas as:

| - | Paying greenmail                                                                   |
| - | Failure to adopt shareholder resolutions receiving a majority of shareholder votes |

| ● | Qualifications |

| ● | Nominating committee in place |

| ● | Number of outside directors on the board |

| ● | Attendance at meetings |

| ● | Overall performance |