Company: ABM
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form Type: DEF 14A
Source: 0000950170-25-020776
Chunk: 36

Company: ABM INDUSTRIES INC /DE/
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form: DEF 14A
Chunk 36
---
 compensation include: attend Committee meetings to present and offer independent recommendations, insights and perspectives on executive compensation matters; assess our Compensation Comparator Group (“CCG”) used for compensation decisions; assess how our executive compensation program aligns with pay for performance; review targeted pay levels and the mix of principal compensation components for the CEO and other NEOs; advise on annual and long-term incentive design and plan structure, performance goals, award opportunities and vesting conditions; and update the Committee on emerging trends and best practices in the area of executive compensation. The Committee meets multiple times throughout the year with the compensation consultant in executive session without management present. The compensation consultant works for the Committee and, with the approval of the Committee, has also provided services to the Governance Committee in connection with director compensation matters. Pay Governance does not provide any other services to the Company. The Committee has determined Pay Governance to be independent from management and that its engagementdid not present any conflicts of interest. From time to time, the Committee may engage other consultants and advisors in connection with various compensation and benefits matters.

The Company’s management retains Willis Towers Watson as its primary compensation consultant to advise on program design, apprise management of evolving practices and trends, and perform other consulting services as needed.

Role of the CEO

The CEO makes recommendations to the Committee on the base salary, annual cash incentive targets, and equity awards for all executive officers other than himself. These recommendations are based on his assessment of each executive officer’s performance during the year and his review of, among other things, competitive market data and analysis of each specific executive’s role.

Use of Market Data and Our Compensation Comparator Group

The Committee uses compensation at our comparator group as one of its tools in connection with its assessment of our executive compensation programs and levels of compensation. Working with Pay Governance, the Committee regularly reviews the various criteria by which it selects the Company’s Compensation Comparator Group. Companies in our CCG are generally selected with reference to the following criteria:

companies, like ABM, that provide business-to-business services, such as outsourcing, logistics management, food service, staffing, and cleaning;

companies in other industries that have a high ratio of employees to revenue or market capitalization; and

companies that generate annual revenue comparable to ABM.

The Committee’s decisions relating to NEO pay are informed by its review of the compensation practices reported in the proxy statements filed by the companies in the CCG. The Committee believes that this proxy data provides a reasonable indicator of total compensation paid by companies that recruit executives with skill sets similar to those which we