Company: TVRD
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form Type: S-4/A
Source: 0001104659-25-013053
Chunk: 857

Company: Tvardi Therapeutics, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form: S-4/A
Chunk 857
---
 approval. The Company had commercial supply revenue of $10,223 for the year ended December 31, 2022, of which $2,295 was recognized in January 2022 with no associated COGS since these inventory costs were incurred prior to regulatory approval on August 23, 2021, and $7,928 was recognized throughout the remainder of 2022 with associated COGS of $7,266 since these inventory costs were capitalized as inventory subsequent to regulatory approval.

The Company had $701 of commercial supply revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 with no associated COGS since these inventory costs were incurred prior to regulatory approval on August 23, 2021.

License and milestone fees revenue

Under Vifor Agreement No. 2, the Company identified two performance obligations at contract inception in 2018: (1) granting of the license to CSL Vifor, and (2) the R&D services. The Company

<div align='center'>F-70</div>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

#### CARA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

### NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<div align='center'>**(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)**</div>

determined that these two performance obligations were not capable of being distinct (i.e., did not have standalone value for CSL Vifor) because CSL Vifor could not benefit (derive potential cash flows) from either one on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to it since CSL Vifor was relying on the Company’s expertise in investigating chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus, or CKD-aP, and its know-how obtained from multiple years of pre-clinical and clinical development, and years of interactions with the FDA which other companies or CROs would not have. The license to CSL Vifor did not provide benefit to CSL Vifor until and unless the Company conducted the pivotal clinical trials and other supportive trials in CKD-aP to gather sufficient clinical data for CSL Vifor to obtain marketing approval in the Territory. Furthermore, CSL Vifor did not have the right to perform development activities on its own unless specifically allocated by the JDC or JSC.

The two identified performance obligations were also not distinct within the context of the contract, (i.e., were not separately identifiable from each other) because of the nature of the promise within the context of the contract. The nature of the promise was to transfer a