Company: ECC-PD
Filing Date: 2025-08-12
Form Type: N-CSRS
Source: 0001104659-25-076373
Chunk: 99

Company: Eagle Point Credit Co Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-08-12
Form: N-CSRS
Chunk 99
---
 Company’s preferred stock, voting separately as a single class. The following individuals’ terms of office as directors continued after the annual meeting given that each person was not up for election at the annual meeting: Scott W. Appleby, Kevin F. McDonald, Jeffrey L. Weiss and Thomas P. Majewski. Investment Advisory Agreement At a meeting held on May 23, 2025, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (the “Company”), including all of the directors that are not interested persons of the Company (voting separately), unanimously voted to approve the continuation and renewal of the existing investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) by and between the Company and Eagle Point Credit Management LLC (the “Adviser”) for an additional one-year period. In reaching a decision to approve the continuation and renewal of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of fund counsel, requested and received a significant amount of information and considered all the factors the Board believed relevant, including, among other things, the following: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services performed by the Adviser, including the investment performance of the Company, other comparable registered investment companies and a certain other account advised by the Adviser; (2) information regarding the fees and other expenses paid by the Company, including the cost of services provided by the Adviser and its affiliates; (3) the profitability to the Adviser of its relationship with the Company, including certain ancillary and other benefits received by the Adviser; (4) comparative information on fees and expenses borne by other comparable registered investment companies, and a certain other account advised by the Adviser; (5) the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Company grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Company’s investors; and (6) various other factors. The Board’s decision to renew the Investment Advisory Agreement was not based on any single factor, but rather was based on a comprehensive consideration of the information provided to the Board at its meetings throughout the year. The Board did not assign relative weights to the factors considered by it as the Board conducted an overall analysis of these factors. Individual members of the Board may have given different weights to different factors. The Board requested, considered and evaluated information regarding the following factors, among others: Nature, Extent and Quality of Services and Performance The Board reviewed and considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser