Company: NC
Filing Date: 2025-04-07
Form Type: ARS
Source: 0000789933-25-000013
Chunk: 33

Company: NACCO INDUSTRIES INC
Filing Date: 2025-04-07
Form: ARS
Chunk 33
---
, they can require securitization through bonding, with the exception of the final mine closure costs for the Coyote Creek Mine, which are being funded throughout the production stage. SMCRA stipulates compliance with many other major environmental programs, including the CAA and CWA. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates activities affecting navigable waters, and the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms regulates the use of explosives for blasting. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) have engaged in a series of rulemakings and other administrative actions under the CWA and other statutes that are directed at reducing the impact of coal mining operations on water bodies. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions The process of burning coal can cause many compounds and impurities in the coal to be released into the air, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides (NOx), mercury, particulates and other matter. Federal and state laws that extensively regulate the emissions of materials into the air affect coal mining operations both directly and indirectly. Direct impacts on coal mining operations occur through permitting requirements and/or emission control requirements relating to air contaminants, especially particulate matter. Indirect impacts on coal mining operations occur through regulation of the air emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, particulate matter and other compounds emitted by coal-fired power plants. In May 2024, the EPA published the final rules for GHG emissions and Mercury Air Toxics Standards (MATS) in the Federal Register. The final MATS and GHG rules will require compliance as early as 2027 and 2032, respectively. Previous efforts by the EPA were met with extensive litigation and there has been a similar response to the new GHG and MATS rules. State coalitions have filed lawsuits challenging both of these rules. Several other entities, including electric generators and industry groups, have joined the lawsuits. In July 2024 and October 2024, stay motions for the GHG and MATS rules were denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit Court), respectively. Following the D.C. Circuit Court denial, emergency stay motions were filed for the GHG and MATS rules with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). In October 2024, the SCOTUS denied the stay applications for the GHG and MAT