Company: TVRD
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form Type: S-4/A
Source: 0001104659-25-013053
Chunk: 61

Company: Tvardi Therapeutics, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-02-14
Form: S-4/A
Chunk 61
---
 or by the combined company if following the consummation of the Merger.

During the pendency of the Merger Agreement, Cara and Tvardi may not be able to enter into a business combination with another party at a favorable price because of restrictions in the Merger Agreement, which could adversely affect their respective businesses.

Covenants in the Merger Agreement impede the ability of Cara and Tvardi to make acquisitions, subject to specified exceptions relating to fiduciary duties, or complete other mergers, sales of assets or other business combinations pending completion of the Merger. As a result, if the Merger is not completed, the parties may be at a disadvantage to their competitors during that period. In addition, while the Merger Agreement is in effect, each party is generally prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or entering into specified extraordinary transactions, such as a merger, sale of assets or other business combination, with any third party, subject to specified exceptions, even if any such transaction could be favorable to such party’s stockholders. For a more complete description of the restrictions on pursuing alternative transactions please see the section titled “ The Merger Agreement ” beginning on page 191of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Certain provisions of the Merger Agreement may discourage third parties from submitting competing proposals, including proposals that may be superior to the arrangements contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

The terms of the Merger Agreement prohibit each of Cara and Tvardi from soliciting competing proposals or cooperating with persons making unsolicited takeover proposals, except in limited circumstances for Cara when the Cara Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that an unsolicited competing proposal constitutes, or is reasonably likely to result in, a superior competing proposal and, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action is reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the Cara Board. Even in such circumstances, while the Cara Board may change its recommendation to Cara stockholders, Cara will remain obligated to hold a stockholder vote on the Required Cara Closing Stockholder Matters and may not terminate the Merger Agreement in order to enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Offer. In addition, if Cara or Tvardi terminate the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including terminating because of a decision of the Cara Board to recommend a superior competing proposal, Cara may be required to pay Tvardi a termination fee of $2.25 million and/or up to $750,000 in expense