Company: SCE-PL
Filing Date: 2025-11-17
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-283973
Chunk: 32

Company: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co
Filing Date: 2025-11-17
Form: 424B3
Chunk 32
---
 which means these funds might be unavailable to pay amounts owing on the bonds In the event of a bankruptcy of the servicer, a party in interest might take the position that the remittance of funds prior to bankruptcy of the servicer, pursuant to the servicing agreement, constitutes a preference under bankruptcy law if the remittance of those funds was deemed to be paid on account of a preexisting debt. If a court were to hold that the remittance of funds constitutes a preference, any such remittance within 90 days of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable, and the funds could be required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of the servicer. To the extent that fixed recovery charges have been commingled with the general funds of the servicer, the risk that a court would hold that a remittance of funds was a preference would increase. Also, we or the servicer may be considered an “insider” with any ESP that is affiliated with us or the servicer. If we or the servicer are considered to be an “insider” of the ESP, any such remittance made within one year of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable as well if the court were to hold that such - 32 -

remittance constitutes a preference. In either case, we or the trustee would merely be an unsecured creditor of the servicer. If any funds were required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of
the servicer, we would expect that the amount of any future fixed recovery charges would be increased through the statutory true-up mechanism to recover such amount, though this would not eliminate the risk of
payment delays or losses on your investment in the bonds.

Claims against SCE or any successor seller might be limited in the event of a bankruptcy of the seller

If the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, claims, including indemnity claims, by
us against the seller under the sale agreement and the other documents executed in connection with the sale agreement would be unsecured claims and would be adjudicated in the bankruptcy case. In addition, the bankruptcy court might estimate any
contingent claims that we have against the seller and, if it determines that the contingency giving rise to these claims is unlikely to occur, estimate the claims at a lower amount. A party in interest in the bankruptcy of the seller might challenge
the enforceability of the indemnity provisions in a sale agreement. If a court were to hold that the indemnity provisions were unenforceable, we would be left