Company: LBRDK
Filing Date: 2025-01-17
Form Type: PRER14A
Source: 0001140361-25-001417
Chunk: 37

Company: Liberty Broadband Corp
Filing Date: 2025-01-17
Form: PRER14A
Chunk 37
---
 the date thereof, of the exchange ratio provided for pursuant to the merger agreement to Charter. Centerview’s opinion did not address any other term or aspect of the merger agreement or the combination and does not constitute a recommendation to Charter stockholders, Liberty Broadband stockholders or any other person as to how such stockholders or other person should vote with respect to the combination or otherwise act with respect to the combination or any other matter. In addition, Centerview expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the combination or any other term or aspect of the Transaction to, or any consideration received in connection with the combination by, or the impact of the combination on, the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Charter, Liberty Broadband or any other party. For a more complete description of the opinion that Centerview delivered, and a summary of the material financial analyses performed in connection with such opinion, please refer to the section “The Combination—Opinion of the Charter Special Committee’s Financial Advisor.” The summary of the opinion of Centerview in the section entitled “The Combination—Opinion of the Charter Special Committee’s Financial Advisor” is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion .

| Q: | What does the opinion of Citi provide? |

The full text of Citi’s written opinion, which describes, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex K to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The description of Citi’s opinion contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. Citi’s opinion was directed to the Charter Board, in its capacity as such, and addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, to Charter of the exchange ratio set forth pursuant to the merger agreement. Citi’s opinion did not address any other terms, aspects or implications of the combination. Citi expressed no view as to, and its opinion did not address, the underlying business decision of Charter to effect or enter into the combination, the relative merits of the combination as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for Charter or the effect of any other transaction which Charter might engage in or consider. Citi’s opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any securityholder should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed combination or otherwise. For a more complete description