Company: BBVXF
Filing Date: 2025-02-21
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0000842180-25-000010
Chunk: 30

Company: BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A.
Filing Date: 2025-02-21
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 3
Chunk 30
---
-in and the fully loaded leverage ratios of the Group were 6.81%). Any failure to comply with this leverage ratio buffer may also result in the need to calculate and report the MDA, and restrictions on discretionary payments. Moreover, CRR II proposes new requirements that capital instruments must meet in order to be considered AT1 or Tier 2 instruments. Once the grandfathering period in CRR II has elapsed, AT1 and/or Tier 2 instruments which do not comply with the new requirements at such date will no longer be considered as capital instruments. This could give rise to shortfalls in BBVA’s or the Group’s regulatory capital and, ultimately, could result in failure to comply with the applicable minimum regulatory capital requirements, with the aforementioned consequences.
Additionally, the implementation of the ECB expectations regarding prudential provisions for NPLs (published on May 15, 2018) and the ECB’s review of internal models being used by banks subject to its supervision for the calculation of their RWAs (“TRIM”), as well as complementary regulatory initiatives like the EBA’s roadmap to repair internal models used to calculate own funds requirements for credit risk under the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach, could result in the need to increase provisions for future NPLs and increases in the Group’s capital needs.
Furthermore, the implementation of the Basel III reforms (informally referred to as Basel IV) described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Supervision and Regulation—Capital Requirements, MREL and Resolution” (including changes to the calculation of the Group’s operational risk) could result in an increase of BBVA’s and the Group’s total RWAs and, therefore, could also result in a decrease of BBVA’s and the Group’s capital ratios. Likewise, the lack of uniformity in the implementation of the Basel III reforms across jurisdictions in terms of timing and applicable regulations could give rise to inequalities and competition distortions. Moreover, the lack of regulatory coordination, with some countries bringing forward the application of Basel III requirements or increasing such requirements, could adversely affect an entity with global operations such as the Group and could affect its profitability.
Additionally, should the Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) requirements, currently only imposed upon financial institutions of global systemic importance (“G-SIBs”), be imposed on non-G-SIBs entities or should the Group once again be classified as a G-SIB, additional minimum requirements similar to MREL could in the future be imposed upon the Group.
There can be