Company: SSUP
Filing Date: 2025-07-30
Form Type: PREM14A
Source: 0001140361-25-027895
Chunk: 213

Company: SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC
Filing Date: 2025-07-30
Form: PREM14A
Chunk 213
---
 by Parent, such Acquisition Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and, in the case of a Change in Recommendation, that the failure to make such Change in Recommendation, would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the members of the Board under applicable Law.

(f) Intervening Event Exception to Change in Recommendation Provision . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 6.2(d) or any other provision of this Agreement, at any time prior to the time the Company Requisite Vote is obtained at the Company Stockholders Meeting, in response to any Intervening Event, the Board may make a Change in Recommendation if all of the following conditions are met:

(i) the Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that the failure to make a Change in Recommendation would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the members of the Board under applicable Law and such determination has been promptly notified to Parent;

(ii) the Company shall have (A) provided to Parent three (3) Business Days’ prior written notice, which shall (1) set forth in reasonable detail information describing the Intervening Event and (2) state, subject to clause (ii) below, the Board has determined to make a Change in Recommendation and (B) prior to making such a Change in Recommendation, used commercially reasonable efforts to engage in good faith with Parent (to the extent Parent wishes to engage) during such notice period to consider any adjustments committed to in writing by Parent to the terms and conditions of this Agreement such that the failure of the Board to make a Change in Recommendation in response to the Intervening Event in accordance with clause (iii) below would no longer reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the members of the Board under applicable Law; and

<div align='center'>A-27</div>

#### TABLE OF CONTENTS
(iii) the Board shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel and taking into account any revised terms committed to in writing by Parent, the failure to make a Change in Recommendation would continue to be reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the members of the Board under applicable Law.

(g) Certain Permitted Disclosure . Nothing contained in this Section 6.2 shall prohibit the Company or the Board from (i) disclosing to the Company’s stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a), Rule 14