Company: LRHC
Filing Date: 2025-12-04
Form Type: DEF 14C
Source: 0001213900-25-118073
Chunk: 21

Company: La Rosa Holdings Corp.
Filing Date: 2025-12-04
Form: DEF 14C
Chunk 21
---
 more Reverse Stock Splits is in the Company’s and our stockholders’ best interests.

We believe that each potential
Reverse Stock Split may improve our ability to maintain listing on Nasdaq. Nasdaq requires, among other items, maintenance of a continued
minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”).
We currently meet the Nasdaq Minimum Bid Requirement. However, we may not meet it in the future. If that’s the case, a Reverse Stock
Split would potentially increase our bid price such that we meet the Minimum Bid Requirement required for maintaining the listing requirements
for the Nasdaq Capital Market. A decrease in the number of outstanding shares of our Common Stock resulting from a Reverse Stock Split
should, absent other factors, increase the per share market price of our Common Stock, although we cannot provide any assurance that our
minimum bid price would remain over the Minimum Bid Price Requirement of Nasdaq following such Reverse Stock Split.

We cannot provide any assurances
that a potential Reverse Stock Split will have a long-term positive effect on the market price of our Common Stock or increase our ability
to be maintain listing for trading on Nasdaq.

Additionally, we believe that
a Reverse Stock Split may make our Common Stock more attractive to a broader range of institutional and other investors, as we have been
advised that the current market price of our Common Stock may affect its acceptability to certain institutional investors, professional
investors and other members of the investing public. As previously discussed, many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal
policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending
low-priced stocks to their customers. In addition, some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades
in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Moreover, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally
represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current average price per share of Common
Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than
would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. We believe that each Reverse Stock Split may make our Common Stock a more
attractive and cost-effective investment for many investors, which would enhance the liquidity of the holders of our Common Stock.

<div align='center'>9</div>

Reducing the number of outstanding
shares