Company: HURA
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form Type: 424B3
Source: 0001193125-25-125499
Chunk: 1008

Company: TuHURA Biosciences, Inc./NV
Filing Date: 2025-05-23
Form: 424B3
Chunk 1008
---
 limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL as so amended. Any
repeal or modification of this Article VI, or the adoption of any provision of this Certificate of Incorporation, inconsistent therewith, by the stockholders of the Corporation or otherwise shall not adversely affect any right or protection of an
officer of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal, modification or adoption of an inconsistent provision. For purposes of this Article VI, “officer” shall have the meaning provided in Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL as the
same exists or may be hereafter be amended.

ARTICLE VII.

1. Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, (i) the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware (or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, the federal district court of the State of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the
Corporation; (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any current or former Director, officer, other employee or stockholder of the Corporation to the Corporation or to the Corporation’s stockholders;
(c) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any

G-4

provision of the DGCL, this Certificate of Incorporation or the Corporation’s By-Laws or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware; or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine; and (ii) subject to the preceding provisions of this , the federal district courts of the United States of
America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause or causes of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including all causes of action
asserted against any defendant to such complaint.

2. The exclusive forum provision set forth in Section 1 of this does not apply to the extent of either (i) exclusive federal jurisdiction pursuant to Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), for claims seeking to enforce any
liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction, or (ii) concurrent jurisdiction under Section 22 of the Securities
Act