Company: VSA
Filing Date: 2025-05-15
Form Type: 20-F
Source: 0001410578-25-001300
Chunk: 213

Company: VisionSys AI Inc
Filing Date: 2025-05-15
Form: 20-F
Item: Item 10
Chunk 213
---
 which provide that a company may present a petition to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands for the appointment of a restructuring officer on the grounds that the company (a) is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts within the meaning of section 93 of the Companies Act; and (b) intends to present a compromise or arrangement to its creditors (or classes thereof) either, pursuant to the Companies Act, the law of a foreign country or by way of a consensual restructuring. The petition may be presented by a company acting by its directors, without a resolution of its members or an express power in its articles of association. On hearing such a petition, the Cayman Islands court may, among other things, make an order appointing a restructuring officer or make any other order as the court thinks fit.

119

(b)   Shareholders’ Suits
-------------------------
In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff and as a general rule a derivative action may not be brought by a minority shareholder. However, based on English authorities, which would in all likelihood be of persuasive authority in the Cayman Islands, the Cayman Islands courts can be expected to follow and apply the common law principles (namely the rule in Foss v. Harbottle and the exceptions thereto) so that a non-controlling shareholder may be permitted to commence a class action against or derivative actions in the name of the company to challenge actions where:

●   a company acts or proposes to act illegally or ultra vires;
---------------------------------------------------------------

●   the act complained of, although not ultra vires, could only be effected duly if authorized by more than a simple majority vote that has not been obtained; and
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

●   those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A shareholder may have a direct right of action against us where the individual rights of that shareholder have been infringed or are about to be infringed.

(c)   Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers and Limitation of Liability
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our fifth amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that that we shall indemnify our officers and directors against all actions