Company: HZEN
Filing Date: 2025-11-25
Form Type: 10-K
Source: 0001193125-25-297573
Chunk: 67

Company: Grayscale Horizen Trust (ZEN)
Filing Date: 2025-11-25
Form: 10-K
Item: Item 6
Chunk 67
---
. In the event of the insolvency of the Trust, its assets may be inadequate to satisfy a claim by its shareholders.There is currently no clearing house for ZEN, nor is there a central or major depository for the custody of ZEN. There is a risk that some or all of the Trust’s ZEN could be lost or stolen. There can be no assurance that the Custodian will maintain adequate insurance or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to the Trust’s ZEN. Further, transactions in ZEN are irrevocable. Stolen or incorrectly transferred ZEN may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed ZEN transactions could adversely affect an investment in the Shares.The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), at least under the prior administration, has stated that certain digital assets may be considered “securities” under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular digital asset is a “security” is complex and difficult to apply, and the outcome is difficult to predict. A number of SEC and SEC staff actions with respect to a variety of digital assets demonstrate this difficulty. For example, public, though non-binding, statements by senior officials at the SEC have indicated that the SEC did not consider Bitcoin or Ether to be securities, and does not currently consider Bitcoin to be a security. In addition, the SEC appears to have implicitly taken the view that Ether is not a security (i) by not objecting to Ether futures trading on Commodity Futures Trading Commission-regulated markets under rules designed for futures on non-security commodity underliers and (ii) by approving the listing and trading of exchange-traded products (“ETPs”) that invest in Ether (i.e., approving the redemption of shares of such ETPs) under the rules for commodity-based trust shares, without requiring these ETPs to be registered as investment companies. Likewise, in various courts filings and arguments the SEC has distinguished Ether from assets that it claimed were securities, and in judicial opinions, courts have accepted or even assumed that Ether is not a security. Moreover, in a recent settlement with another market participant relating to allegations that it acted as an unregistered broker-dealer for facilitating trading in certain digital assets, the SEC highlighted that the firm would cease trading in all digital assets other than Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Ether—activity that, if the SEC believed Ether was presently a security—would continue to constitute unregistered brokerage activity. The SEC staff has also provided informal assurances via no-action letter to a handful of promoters that their digital