Company: PATH
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form Type: 10-Q
Source: 0001734722-25-000030
Chunk: 76

Company: UiPath, Inc.
Filing Date: 2025-06-03
Form: 10-Q
Item: Part I, Item 8
Chunk 76
---
 complaint, and on March 26, 2024, filed a further amended complaint, which alleges Securities Act claims under Sections 11 and 15 as well as Exchange Act claims under Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Section 20(a). In support of the Securities Act claims, the plaintiff alleges material misstatements and omissions in UiPath’s April 2021 Registration Statement, including regarding UiPath’s competitive position and its financial results. The operative complaint is purportedly brought on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired UiPath common 

17

Table of ContentsUiPath, Inc.Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)(unaudited)

stock between April 21, 2021 and September 27, 2022. It seeks unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and other unspecified relief as the Court deems appropriate. On April 23, 2024, the defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. On November 4, 2024, the Court issued its opinion and order on the motion to dismiss, wherein it dismissed all claims under the Securities Act, but allowed the case to proceed with respect to two statements relating to competition that the plaintiffs allege violated the Exchange Act. On February 28, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Representative and Class Counsel, and on April 29, 2025, defendants filed their opposition to the motion. On May 29, 2025, the plaintiff sought leave of the court to amend the second amended complaint.On November 30, 2023, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against UiPath, as nominal defendant, and then Co-CEO Daniel Dines, CFO Ashim Gupta, and several of UiPath’s current and former directors. The case is captioned Polilingua Limited v. Daniel Dines, et al. The lawsuit alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and committed other alleged misconduct in connection with the statements at issue in the 2023 Securities Action and by causing UiPath to repurchase shares at allegedly inflated prices. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and/or restitution on behalf of UiPath, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees and certain changes to UiPath’s corporate governance and internal controls. Similar cases were filed in the District of Delaware (captioned In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation