Company: SLNH
Filing Date: 2025-02-03
Form Type: S-1/A
Source: 0001493152-25-004555
Chunk: 298

Company: Soluna Holdings, Inc
Filing Date: 2025-02-03
Form: S-1/A
Chunk 298
---
 requests. On November 6, 2024, NYDIG sent a second “meet and confer” letter seeking (i) the production of additional/supplemental documents from Soluna by November 20, 2024 and (ii) the deposition of a representative of the Defendants on or before December 15, 2024. The parties remain in discussions regarding the requested supplemental discovery.

Additionally, NYDIG has stated its intention to pursue SCI, the parent company of Guarantor, under a piercing of the corporate veil theory relating to NYDIG Defendants’ debts and liabilities under the loan documents. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself from NYDIG’s parent company claims. SCI denies any such liability and has filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment against NYDIG in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada on March 16, 2023, seeking a declaratory judgment as to such matter. NYDIG filed a motion to dismiss in response to SCI’s declaratory judgment complaint on April 13, 2023. SCI filed a response in opposition to NYDIG’s motion to dismiss on April 27, 2023. The court heard oral arguments on May 16, 2023. On June 22, 2023, the court issued an order granting NYDIG’s motion to dismiss, on the basis that the case was not ripe for decision, without prejudice. SCI intends to continue to vigorously defend any allegations regarding liability on account of NYDIG Defendants’ debts and liabilities to NYDIG under their loan documents and intends to refile a declaratory judgment complaint against NYDIG.

As of September 30, 2024, the Company still has an outstanding principal of approximately $ 9.2million and outstanding interest and penalty balance of approximately $ 1.9million. This settlement did not result in the admission of any liability on the part of SHI, whose declaratory judgment remains the subject of litigation.

In September 2023, Atlas Technology Group LLC (“Atlas”) filed a complaint against Soluna MC LLC, Soluna Computing, Inc., and Soluna Holdings, Inc. (collectively, the “Atlas Defendants”) in the Supreme Court of New York regarding a co-location services agreement. Atlas alleged that Soluna MC’s termination of the agreement was a breach, seeking a return of pre-paid fees of approximately $ 464thousand, additional damages of at least $ 7.9million, and reimbursement of legal fees. The complaint also mentioned alter ego liability and corporate veil piercing.

The Atlas