LLM-Attack Suite — v2.0
In plain language
Most "this defence works" claims can't be compared — every study measured something different. We built the ruler. LLM-Attack Suite is an open framework that forces privacy evaluations to say exactly what the attacker saw, what it knew, and what it was allowed to spend. Attacks replay the same recorded traffic, predictions are kept for independent re-scoring, and no defence can pass without a linked undefended reference. Running it on real systems showed that changing a single measurement choice can flip the conclusion — including the gradient-leakage findings of the companion studies (arXiv:2609.04382, arXiv:2610.04128).
This release contains the combined concise paper and full supplement, the retained experimental evidence, and the executable source snapshots needed to inspect or reproduce the reported analyses. The release tag is v2.0. It changes branding, paper packaging and release metadata only, reusing unchanged v1.0 scientific evidence and executable source. No new experiments or validation reruns are reported. The v1.0 release remains available with its original paper filenames and contents.
LLM-Attack Suite is a modular collection of scripts and attack modules for LLM privacy and security evaluation across model, serving, protocol, application and agent surfaces. This paper studies privacy in split and distributed LLM systems.
Naming and prior work. Mei, Nie, Sun and Tian introduced LLM-Attacker for LLM-guided adversarial scenario generation in autonomous driving (IEEE publication). We acknowledge that earlier use and name this application LLM-Attack Suite. The llm-attacker package and command, attacker imports, plugin and schema identifiers, environment-variable names and frozen evidence filenames retain their existing names for compatibility and reproducibility. These legacy identifiers refer to this suite. The Hugging Face repository has moved to Setloop/LLM-Attack-Suite; earlier repository links redirect to the new path. This URL correction preserves the existing v1.0 and v2.0 tags, paper bytes and evidence.
Paper and source
- Combined manuscript: the concise main text followed by S-numbered supplementary material and one bibliography.
- arXiv source ZIP: one top-level
main.tex, the included supplementary source, precompiled bibliography and all five required figures. The extracted bundle compiles with pdfLaTeX. - Editable paper sources.
- Source repository: maintained framework; Python package version remains
1.0.0.
The authors are Georgios Politis and Evangelos Pappas; the title layout includes Setloop.io between the author blocks. The earlier-title preprint is arXiv:2610.22722. The revised manuscript is prepared as a replacement for arXiv v2 and has not yet been submitted; this repository's v2.0 release does not update arXiv automatically. The paper is not presented as accepted conference work. The chosen arXiv distribution licence is arXiv's perpetual, non-exclusive licence.
Before submitting the arXiv replacement, confirm prior AI systems and their tasks and the status/overlap of related papers, then complete the acknowledgement. EuroS&P also needs verified anonymous reviewer access to code and complete evidence. These submission actions remain open; this repository release does not complete them.
Scope of the evidence
The reviewed paper catalogue covers 64 modules. The maintained GitHub package registers 65, including secure-compute-audit, which is outside that historical qualification matrix. Implementation qualification and synthetic checks are distinct from real-target privacy measurements. The strongest controlled reconstruction comparisons concern GPT-2 124M under the declared corpora, lengths, observations, knowledge and budgets; additional Qwen and Mistral campaigns establish their own protocol-specific outcomes.
The release retains the original experimental files and hashes. Historical source identifiers and experimental names inside frozen records remain provenance labels, not active Git navigation targets. All current navigation uses v2.0; the source snapshots below preserve reproduction independently of the former repository history.
Retained artifacts
| Path | Contents |
|---|---|
v3-campaign/ |
Main GPT-2 measurements, predictions, journals and paired analyses |
binary-tier/ |
Captures referenced by the campaign |
corpora/, protocols/, positive-controls/ |
Pinned inputs, evaluation protocols and controls |
domain-shift-v1/, long-horizon-v1/, clustered-gate-v1/ |
Corpus, training-horizon and uncertainty analyses |
all-boundary-whitebox-reconstruction/, phase2-raw-evidence/ |
Validated white-box/compression studies and retained raw evidence |
bisr-conformance-validation/, bisr-conformance-run-artifacts/, bisr-adapted-comparison/ |
Published-implementation checks and adapted comparison |
defence-training-500-step-extension/ |
Frozen training extension and rescoring |
agentic-live-v1/, agentic-nonthinking-decoding/ |
Distinct planner protocols and negative outcomes |
code/, source-snapshots/ |
Retained base code plus scoped reviewed/base executable archives |
validation/measurement-20261001/ |
Frozen 37-case measurement validation, exact source and Git-independent runner |
The validation package's source-snapshot.tar.gz matches all 123 retained source-file hashes. The original selection, results and manifest remain unchanged. Its 37-case outcome is the historical v1.0 validation result, not a v2.0 rerun. reproduce_from_snapshot.py verifies the archive before running the frozen selection. See REPRODUCE.md for download, integrity, rescoring and reproduction commands. These conformance checks are not independent empirical attack results.
Access and licences
This dataset has a publicly visible listing. Downloading protected files currently requires a Hugging Face account and manual approval; the linked GitHub source repository is public. This named release does not provide anonymous conference-review access to the gated evidence.
Framework code and release packaging carry MIT licence metadata and the supplied LICENSE. To contribute attack modules, defences or fixes, see the source repository's CONTRIBUTING.md; contributions are licensed under the MIT licence. Third-party models, corpora and dependencies retain their own terms. The paper's arXiv distribution choice is separate. Captures and recovered text should be handled under the applicable data permissions. The clinical-style text is synthetic and does not contain patient records.
Integrity and use
MANIFEST.sha256 lists SHA-256 digests for the retained release files, excluding .gitattributes and the manifest itself. Package-specific manifests are preserved unchanged. LFS-backed files are identified by their immutable SHA-256 object identifiers; RELEASE.json records the release's verification scope. INDEX.md maps the principal evidence families.
Use the framework only for systems and data for which you have authorisation. Results apply to the declared protocol; untested attacks remain untested, and a scorecard pass is not universal privacy assurance.
- Downloads last month
- 151