Datasets:
id stringlengths 21 21 | kind stringclasses 3
values | options listlengths 2 6 | target listlengths 2 6 | state stringlengths 160 250 | question stringclasses 21
values | domain stringclasses 3
values | family stringclasses 1
value | source stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v3_75e49d97008d3ac9_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.08,
0,
0.04,
0.88
] | A code repository includes participant identifiers without a DUA; additionally is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy. Context: before the personnel departure, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_39091cbf8dc9bf1c_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.13,
0.36,
0.22,
0.26,
0.02,
0.01
] | A conference submission exceeds the journal scope but is sound; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: for a top-tier venue, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the operator. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_5080ab9300d65f90_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0.01,
0.14,
0.85
] | A collaboration archive has 3 undocumented transformations; additionally includes participant identifiers without a DUA. Context: before the personnel departure, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_d21707b56c38149a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0.06,
0.79,
0.15
] | A lab notebook has an embargo expiring next month; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: before the personnel departure, shortly after a software update. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_ba42ee58f4765043_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0,
0.07,
0.93
] | A collaboration archive contains PHI on an open share; additionally follows the FAIR principles assessment. Context: before the personnel departure, immediately after go-live. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_1ec9887e823e00d5_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.13,
0.87
] | A collaboration archive uses community-standard file formats; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: for the journal submission, during normal operations. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: the dataset is fit for sharing? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b76efeaeb2f0c874_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0.04,
0.16,
0.8
] | A collaboration archive follows the FAIR principles assessment; additionally includes participant identifiers without a DUA. Context: before the personnel departure, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the automated check. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_921379c0e530be54_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.03,
0.03,
0.05,
0.27,
0.57,
0.05
] | A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: at the thesis defense, mid-incident. Reported by the automated check. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_d9df7eb228c32eaf_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.32,
0.68
] | A preprint includes raw data and analysis code; additionally reports only the significant subgroup. Context: under the preprint policy, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: the conclusions exceed the data? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b3927949ca4e9c71_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.45,
0.55
] | An observed correlation reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: for a grant review, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_99dd37a676791e5f_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0.01,
0.06,
0.7,
0.23
] | A lab notebook has versioned metadata and checksums; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: for the journal submission, following a recent audit. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_6587f2ac8d82f85e_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.03,
0.58,
0.32,
0.07,
0
] | A conference submission addresses the known confound explicitly; additionally has a methods section that cannot be reproduced. Context: in a fast-track review, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e29dabe0453ee0ea_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0,
0.06,
0.94
] | A dataset has versioned metadata and checksums; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: before the personnel departure, during the quarterly review. Reported by the supervisor. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_356246156b2480b4_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.15,
0.32,
0.2,
0.29,
0.03,
0.01
] | A conference submission replicates the key finding with an independent cohort; additionally uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics. Context: under the preprint policy, under reduced staffing. Reported by the automated check. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_a8ce9d25ca1508f0_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0.17,
0.68,
0.15
] | A code repository lacks a data dictionary; additionally follows the FAIR principles assessment. Context: before the personnel departure, under an active deadline. Reported by the automated check. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_d26c80d9df7b3ce7_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.34,
0.2,
0.45,
0.01
] | A code repository follows the FAIR principles assessment; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: for the journal submission, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the monitoring system. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_8e5e44806cffbc0b_c | choice | [
"replicate",
"design_falsification_test",
"abandon",
"fund_fully"
] | [
0.25,
0.74,
0,
0.01
] | An observed correlation predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the monitoring system. | Next step for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_ccf40f8ad3cd4e0c_c | choice | [
"replicate",
"design_falsification_test",
"abandon",
"fund_fully"
] | [
0.02,
0.4,
0.58,
0
] | A proposed mechanism postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, during peak load. Reported by the automated check. | Next step for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_430fb718fae719e1_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.31,
0.66,
0.01,
0
] | A conference submission exceeds the journal scope but is sound; additionally reports n=12 with no power analysis. Context: under the preprint policy, during the morning shift. Reported by the automated check. | Rate scientific rigor for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f8646ec2348284f0_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.68,
0.32
] | A manuscript includes raw data and analysis code; additionally exceeds the journal scope but is sound. Context: under the preprint policy, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: publication is warranted? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_65422b5e777435fd_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.09,
0.12,
0.18,
0.44,
0.15,
0.02
] | A dataset has versioned metadata and checksums; additionally has an embargo expiring next month. Context: under the funder mandate, mid-incident. Reported by the operator. | Rate reusability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_8c7cff0ecd25711e_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.95,
0,
0,
0.05
] | A lab notebook has an embargo expiring next month; additionally uses community-standard file formats. Context: in the institutional repository, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f49dcb68ae674c72_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.08,
0.26,
0.36,
0.27,
0.02
] | A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for a grant review, mid-incident. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_58f6875383165bae_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0.01,
0.12,
0.55,
0.32
] | A collaboration archive lacks provenance for the derived columns; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: for the journal submission, mid-incident. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_8b387e435a588e28_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.88,
0.12
] | A proposed mechanism requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: at the thesis defense, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_1c074a11b0185083_c | choice | [
"replicate",
"design_falsification_test",
"abandon",
"fund_fully"
] | [
0.76,
0.23,
0.01,
0
] | An observed correlation predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for the press release, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the supervisor. | Next step for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_a92ceb0855601c82_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.93,
0.07
] | A collaboration archive includes participant identifiers without a DUA; additionally lacks a data dictionary. Context: under the funder mandate, under reduced staffing. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the dataset is fit for sharing? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f9a00c77ff750561_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.03,
0.01,
0.02,
0.94
] | A dataset has an embargo expiring next month; additionally has 3 undocumented transformations. Context: under the funder mandate, during normal operations. Reported by the review queue. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f4c8fbbda40ca67b_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.05,
0.05,
0.27,
0.5,
0.12,
0.01
] | A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e47e7126a3eaa197_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.22,
0.78
] | An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, during the morning shift. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_222ab128d4655531_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.68,
0.32
] | A collaboration archive has an embargo expiring next month; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: for the journal submission, during the system migration. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: a privacy review is required? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_ca9213f9f32295f8_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.11,
0.79,
0.08,
0
] | A grant application cites 3 works from the authors themselves only; additionally claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote. Context: under the preprint policy, during normal operations. Reported by the operator. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_dabc9bbe9c19aeda_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.64,
0.36
] | A proposed mechanism reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: at the thesis defense, immediately after go-live. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_8355ac8315037598_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.1,
0.32,
0.34,
0.2,
0.03,
0.01
] | A preprint cites 3 works from the authors themselves only; additionally uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics. Context: under the preprint policy, during peak load. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_3bc5d3b5760a6122_c | choice | [
"statistics",
"methods",
"novelty",
"framing"
] | [
0.76,
0.05,
0,
0.19
] | A grant application reports only the significant subgroup; additionally exceeds the journal scope but is sound. Context: in a fast-track review, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Primary flaw for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f5d3f3ee78c0ae66_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.63,
0.37
] | A preprint reports n=12 with no power analysis; additionally exceeds the journal scope but is sound. Context: for a top-tier venue, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the conclusions exceed the data? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e1d85e0de3af235a_c | choice | [
"strongly_supported",
"tentatively_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.24,
0.03,
0.55,
0.18
] | A proposed mechanism has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check. | Verdict for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_243cb6136cddd589_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.51,
0.49
] | A conference submission uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: in a fast-track review, mid-incident. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the methods section is reproducible? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_cf6d35dd806ee4f2_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.38,
0.62
] | A manuscript exceeds the journal scope but is sound; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: for a top-tier venue, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the methods section is reproducible? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f39d5d6ce2f409b3_c | choice | [
"statistics",
"methods",
"novelty",
"framing"
] | [
0.18,
0.36,
0.12,
0.34
] | A conference submission claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: at revision 2, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the monitoring system. | Primary flaw for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f8cb30964a7abf25_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.03,
0.22,
0.56,
0.16,
0.01
] | A lab notebook has 3 undocumented transformations; additionally is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy. Context: in the institutional repository, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate reusability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_925d768597475078_c | choice | [
"accept",
"minor_revision",
"major_revision",
"reject"
] | [
0,
0,
0.16,
0.84
] | A grant application exceeds the journal scope but is sound; additionally has a methods section that cannot be reproduced. Context: under the preprint policy, during normal operations. Reported by the automated check. | Recommendation for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f21aca03fbe60337_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.77,
0.23
] | A grant application has a methods section that cannot be reproduced; additionally uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics. Context: under the preprint policy, immediately after go-live. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: publication is warranted? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_843fdc8e318d8e2c_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0.02,
0.28,
0.49,
0.21
] | A code repository has 3 undocumented transformations; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: in the institutional repository, under reduced staffing. Reported by the operator. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_77a5610fc9d1f441_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0.18,
0.49,
0.33
] | A collaboration archive includes participant identifiers without a DUA; additionally has an embargo expiring next month. Context: in the institutional repository, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_823ce5508f4970db_c | choice | [
"strongly_supported",
"tentatively_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.02,
0.4,
0.56,
0.02
] | An observed correlation requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, immediately after go-live. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Verdict for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_45d2feb2c1001c42_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.14,
0.24,
0.31,
0.22,
0.08,
0.01
] | An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_3d37906e56f857b0_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.91,
0.09
] | A proposed mechanism explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f3302e7a85babafc_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.22,
0.78
] | A dataset lacks a data dictionary; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: in the institutional repository, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b523b38b6b15c2a9_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.07,
0.93
] | A dataset is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: for the journal submission, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: a privacy review is required? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_73b5563b59b9fc58_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.31,
0.04,
0.04,
0.61
] | A lab notebook has an embargo expiring next month; additionally uses community-standard file formats. Context: before the personnel departure, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the automated check. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_1b8249df49f58df7_c | choice | [
"accept",
"minor_revision",
"major_revision",
"reject"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.58,
0.39
] | A preprint addresses the known confound explicitly; additionally has a methods section that cannot be reproduced. Context: in a fast-track review, during peak load. Reported by the monitoring system. | Recommendation for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_3d03d2be493af8cb_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.08,
0.37,
0.5,
0.04,
0
] | A preprint addresses the known confound explicitly; additionally reports n=12 with no power analysis. Context: for a top-tier venue, during the quarterly review. Reported by the review queue. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f7c8cca285beca1d_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.78,
0.22
] | A preprint addresses the known confound explicitly; additionally includes raw data and analysis code. Context: at revision 2, during an external partner integration. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the conclusions exceed the data? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_47d6719bf1f82281_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.55,
0.45
] | A manuscript uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics; additionally addresses the known confound explicitly. Context: at revision 2, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the methods section is reproducible? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f9db6260186531ad_c | choice | [
"strongly_supported",
"tentatively_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.04,
0.06,
0.84,
0.06
] | An observed correlation explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Verdict for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_a85bb3be566e0a52_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.1,
0.29,
0.56,
0.04,
0
] | A conference submission claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote; additionally exceeds the journal scope but is sound. Context: at revision 2, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the operator. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b4623f84529ce9b7_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.1,
0.43,
0.33,
0.11,
0.01
] | A preprint has a methods section that cannot be reproduced; additionally includes raw data and analysis code. Context: under the preprint policy, immediately after go-live. Reported by the automated check. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_3278aaa91a9199a8_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.5,
0.5
] | A dataset follows the FAIR principles assessment; additionally uses community-standard file formats. Context: before the personnel departure, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: a privacy review is required? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_931b753e757df192_c | choice | [
"accept",
"minor_revision",
"major_revision",
"reject"
] | [
0,
0.01,
0.45,
0.54
] | A manuscript reports n=12 with no power analysis; additionally reports only the significant subgroup. Context: at revision 2, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the monitoring system. | Recommendation for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_454af686cfb8bdaf_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.79,
0.21
] | A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e4b699930cd90405_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.1,
0.28,
0.4,
0.21,
0.01,
0
] | A code repository is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy; additionally lacks provenance for the derived columns. Context: in the institutional repository, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the review queue. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_9c5f31b29ac97cc0_c | choice | [
"statistics",
"methods",
"novelty",
"framing"
] | [
0.11,
0.23,
0.13,
0.53
] | A preprint uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: at revision 2, under an active deadline. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Primary flaw for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b6e471102ff8ead2_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.12,
0.23,
0.28,
0.26,
0.09,
0.02
] | An observed correlation explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: at the thesis defense, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the operator. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_eb953ab3ef091e05_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.16,
0.84
] | A predictive model survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_607fb091f273b656_c | choice | [
"accept",
"minor_revision",
"major_revision",
"reject"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.29,
0.69
] | A grant application exceeds the journal scope but is sound; additionally reports n=12 with no power analysis. Context: in a fast-track review, mid-incident. Reported by the automated check. | Recommendation for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_d996ae89a1c2d228_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.89,
0.11
] | A lab notebook is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy; additionally lacks provenance for the derived columns. Context: under the funder mandate, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: the documentation is sufficient? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e1989e489ce67b2c_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.04,
0.02,
0.07,
0.62,
0.25,
0
] | A grant application claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote; additionally reports n=12 with no power analysis. Context: at revision 2, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_80ab91df51694c85_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.59,
0.41
] | A predictive model requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for the press release, during peak load. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_31ed960cbbacee74_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.29,
0.16,
0.06,
0.49
] | A lab notebook has 3 undocumented transformations; additionally lacks a data dictionary. Context: before the personnel departure, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the supervisor. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_d6d5474eaf01ef0f_c | choice | [
"institutional",
"domain_specific",
"general",
"restricted"
] | [
0.96,
0.02,
0.01,
0.01
] | A dataset lacks a data dictionary; additionally uses community-standard file formats. Context: in the institutional repository, immediately after go-live. Reported by the supervisor. | Repository choice for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e1ea71809dc4e99c_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.94,
0.06
] | A lab notebook lacks provenance for the derived columns; additionally follows the FAIR principles assessment. Context: in the institutional repository, following a recent audit. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the documentation is sufficient? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_17ca8ad52877a316_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.58,
0.42
] | A proposed mechanism reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: in the journal club, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_5dcde1ceb257eea0_c | choice | [
"strongly_supported",
"tentatively_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.08,
0.02,
0.71,
0.19
] | A hypothesis postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, under reduced staffing. Reported by the review queue. | Verdict for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_f14e64f4bd6bae8d_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.1,
0.13,
0.11,
0.37,
0.24,
0.05
] | A predictive model is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_fe1132e8f0d7e636_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.68,
0.32
] | A conference submission reports n=12 with no power analysis; additionally replicates the key finding with an independent cohort. Context: at revision 2, during peak load. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: the methods section is reproducible? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_9bcf0c1173e7f629_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.67,
0.33
] | A hypothesis explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_86890f39cc660dc8_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.38,
0.62
] | An observed correlation relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: for the press release, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_551b89dbfc52377f_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.84,
0.16
] | A predictive model explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_189a63f6c7ad0779_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0.18,
0.8,
0.02
] | A grant application has a methods section that cannot be reproduced; additionally reports only the significant subgroup. Context: at revision 2, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_36f54ae51e9439f3_c | choice | [
"compliant",
"fixable",
"non_compliant",
"violation"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.09,
0.89
] | A code repository follows the FAIR principles assessment; additionally includes participant identifiers without a DUA. Context: for the journal submission, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the supervisor. | Compliance status for this scenario. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_1db34a792eca79e3_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.49,
0.37,
0.09,
0.05,
0,
0
] | A code repository is stored with a 3-2-1 backup strategy; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: under the funder mandate, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_e008ff8b30588715_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.05,
0.18,
0.63,
0.12,
0.01
] | A conference submission cites 3 works from the authors themselves only; additionally exceeds the journal scope but is sound. Context: at revision 2, immediately after go-live. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_7d4a8a3b4429ac65_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.97,
0.03
] | A dataset has an embargo expiring next month; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: under the funder mandate, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the dataset is fit for sharing? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_90851e30d5cdd6f9_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0.05,
0.84,
0.11
] | A dataset has 3 undocumented transformations; additionally includes participant identifiers without a DUA. Context: in the institutional repository, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue. | Rate privacy risk for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_eb5f2c7a7af1f079_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.09,
0.91
] | A conference submission includes raw data and analysis code; additionally claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote. Context: for a top-tier venue, during normal operations. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the conclusions exceed the data? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_73bb92a0d9bb38a2_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.49,
0.51
] | A manuscript addresses the known confound explicitly; additionally uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics. Context: at revision 2, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the methods section is reproducible? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_aaef30c1ff9bbd68_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.01,
0.07,
0.45,
0.45,
0.01
] | A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_fdca00d869c82efa_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.07,
0.27,
0.28,
0.3,
0.07,
0.01
] | A predictive model is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for a grant review, during the system migration. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_0cb8cb1760009f0b_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.22,
0.78
] | A lab notebook uses community-standard file formats; additionally has versioned metadata and checksums. Context: under the funder mandate, during the morning shift. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the dataset is fit for sharing? | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_21891ddb25aec69a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.05,
0.39,
0.53,
0.03,
0
] | A preprint claims a breakthrough from a single anecdote; additionally uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics. Context: under the preprint policy, during peak load. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate scientific rigor for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_c24b2f86a1c336dd_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.2,
0.36,
0.36,
0.05,
0.01
] | An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: at the thesis defense, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_676b881bd91a838d_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.05,
0.57,
0.34,
0.03,
0.01
] | A manuscript reports n=12 with no power analysis; additionally includes raw data and analysis code. Context: in a fast-track review, during the morning shift. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate scientific rigor for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b5516b03ca3cb20c_c | choice | [
"accept",
"minor_revision",
"major_revision",
"reject"
] | [
0.01,
0.03,
0.53,
0.43
] | A manuscript replicates the key finding with an independent cohort; additionally reports only the significant subgroup. Context: for a top-tier venue, shortly after a software update. Reported by the monitoring system. | Recommendation for this scenario. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_b288b8b079cd0de0_c | choice | [
"strongly_supported",
"tentatively_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.02,
0.26,
0.7,
0.02
] | An observed correlation makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: in the journal club, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the operator. | Verdict for this scenario. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_91ec7023a086dd8a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.12,
0.08,
0.11,
0.48,
0.2,
0.01
] | An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check. | Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_85440eecec40572b_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.8,
0.2
] | A grant application reports n=12 with no power analysis; additionally cites 3 works from the authors themselves only. Context: under the preprint policy, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: publication is warranted? | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_0f240dfe2969e9a9_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.02,
0.09,
0.68,
0.2
] | A code repository has versioned metadata and checksums; additionally contains PHI on an open share. Context: before the personnel departure, mid-incident. Reported by the operator. | Rate reusability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | research_data_mgmt | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_34bc65b940f184ae_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.86,
0.14
] | A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during the system migration. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim? | hypothesis_eval | science | yuri_v3 |
v3_9d709b771bcb1705_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.01,
0.27,
0.62,
0.1,
0
] | A preprint uses appropriate mixed-effects statistics; additionally reports only the significant subgroup. Context: in a fast-track review, shortly after a software update. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate significance for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | peer_review | science | yuri_v3 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
JEV corpus - science family
23,526 typed calibrated decision rows from the jev-distill-corpus-v3 corpus, grouped by family.
Each row is one typed decision: kind (noul / choice / score), a state, a question, options, and a target probability distribution over the options.
Domains in this family
hypothesis_eval- 7,884 rowsresearch_data_mgmt- 7,859 rowspeer_review- 7,783 rows
Other views of the same data
- per-domain:
SargeDev/jev-corpus-<domain> - the whole corpus in one repo: SargeDev/jev-distill-corpus-v3
- Downloads last month
- 20