id stringlengths 37 44 | kind stringclasses 2
values | options listlengths 2 6 | target listlengths 2 6 | state stringlengths 200 1.26k | question stringclasses 769
values | domain stringclasses 1
value | family stringclasses 1
value | source stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
reasoning-control-v1:76109:612:decision | choice | [
"event_8aa84f_2: Event event_8aa84f_2",
"event_8aa84f_3: Event event_8aa84f_3",
"event_8aa84f_1: Event event_8aa84f_1",
"event_8aa84f_0: Event event_8aa84f_0"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:01:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_8aa84f_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T22:27:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_8aa84f_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:58:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_8aa84f_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T08:32:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_8aa84f_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:00:00+00:00"... | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:796:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "61fc986797384c25", "values": [-8, -29, -22, -30, -5, 26], "zero_based_index": 3} | Task: Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 26
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1611:decision | choice | [
"unreachable: No directed path exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists"
] | [
0,
1,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["N51964d_0", "N51964d_2"], ["N51964d_3", "N51964d_2"], ["N51964d_4", "N51964d_3"]], "goal": "N51964d_2", "nodes": ["N51964d_0", "N51964d_1", "N51964d_2", "N51964d_3", "N51964d_4"], "record_id": "51964dcf2abfc51a", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoing edges; no unstated edges e... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1712:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "df3be281e5ec56f1", "source": "x = -14\nfor item in [11, 3, 6, -1]:\n if item > -1:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 3\nresult = x * 3\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:681:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "ee0b341c417a8925", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -5, "b": 8, "c": -8}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -49
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:436:decision | choice | [
"124: The exact integer result is 124",
"107: The exact integer result is 107",
"125: The exact integer result is 125",
"135: The exact integer result is 135"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "4438c381b3e1614a", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 19, "b": 6, "c": 10}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1173:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "45fcb1bedbb2f233", "source": "x = -4\nfor item in [7, 10, 11, 7]:\n if item > 1:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 6\nresult = x * -1\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -26
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:289:decision | choice | [
"-22: The exact integer result is -22",
"-20: The exact integer result is -20",
"-23: The exact integer result is -23",
"-39: The exact integer result is -39"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"expression": "(a - b) * c", "record_id": "de76ce9f3b0eda52", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 9, "b": 11, "c": 11}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:78:decision | choice | [
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"unreachable: No directed path exists"
] | [
1,
0,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["N14cfa7_0", "N14cfa7_2"], ["N14cfa7_1", "N14cfa7_0"], ["N14cfa7_2", "N14cfa7_3"], ["N14cfa7_2", "N14cfa7_4"], ["N14cfa7_3", "N14cfa7_4"], ["N14cfa7_4", "N14cfa7_1"]], "goal": "N14cfa7_0", "nodes": ["N14cfa7_0", "N14cfa7_1", "N14cfa7_2", "N14cfa7_3", "N14cfa7_4"], "record_id": "14cfa7d13374a07d", "... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1494:decision | choice | [
"event_75d131_3: Event event_75d131_3",
"event_75d131_0: Event event_75d131_0",
"event_75d131_2: Event event_75d131_2",
"event_75d131_1: Event event_75d131_1"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:35:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_75d131_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T04:59:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_75d131_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:51:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_75d131_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T18:14:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_75d131_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:34:00+00:00"... | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:131:decision | choice | [
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"-8: The exact integer result is -8",
"-4: The exact integer result is -4",
"-12: The exact integer result is -12"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "0a7fdf62e8fde1db", "values": [3, -38, -37, 27, 21, -10], "zero_based_index": 3} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:556:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T13:18:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_c2ea40_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T09:29:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_c2ea40_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T03:42:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_c2ea40_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T07:28:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_c2ea40_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:11:00+09:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_c2ea40_0
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:844:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "04e0d66a4d0e9b78", "source": "x = -11\nfor item in [-6, -6, 11, 7]:\n if item > 0:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 5\nresult = x * 0\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -3
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1034:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "3383942d667a9b53", "values": [-7, -25, 37, -4, 13, 6], "zero_based_index": 1} | Task: Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 6
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2293:decision | choice | [
"-17: The exact integer result is -17",
"-18: The exact integer result is -18",
"-20: The exact integer result is -20",
"-6: The exact integer result is -6"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "a855b5c1a321b1c7", "source": "x = -14\nfor item in [-5, -1, 3, -5]:\n if item > -1:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 2\nresult = x * 1\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1495:decision | choice | [
"-7: The exact integer result is -7",
"-9: The exact integer result is -9",
"-26: The exact integer result is -26",
"-12: The exact integer result is -12"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "004c4a6c02235161", "source": "x = 9\nfor item in [7, -3, -2, 5]:\n if item > -2:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 6\nresult = x * -1\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1675:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "b8dfbdfc1972d51f", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 14, "b": 11, "c": 14}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 151
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1663:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "131f494296fae0df", "source": "x = -6\nfor item in [8, 2, -6, -6]:\n if item > 3:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 1\nresult = x * 3\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -20
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2296:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_aa77f0_0": true, "p_aa77f0_1": true, "p_aa77f0_2": false, "p_aa77f0_3": false}, "expression": "(NOT (p_aa77f0_3) AND NOT (p_aa77f0_1))", "record_id": "aa77f065943f0707", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to false
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1994:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_3be012", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: No eligible status record remains
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:241:decision | choice | [
"event_3b3e5e_0: Event event_3b3e5e_0",
"event_3b3e5e_3: Event event_3b3e5e_3",
"event_3b3e5e_2: Event event_3b3e5e_2",
"event_3b3e5e_1: Event event_3b3e5e_1"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T13:24:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_3b3e5e_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:20:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_3b3e5e_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T07:12:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_3b3e5e_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:33:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_3b3e5e_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T16:31:00+02:00"... | Which event occurs latest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1767:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T10:31:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_598a22_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:54:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_598a22_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:22:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_598a22_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T23:38:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_598a22_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T18:51:00+09:00"... | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_598a22_3
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2096:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T11:44:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_1d9191_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:47:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_1d9191_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T15:12:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_1d9191_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:22:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_1d9191_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T12:36:00+02:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_1d9191_2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:441:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_70fb89_0": true, "p_70fb89_1": true, "p_70fb89_2": false, "p_70fb89_3": true}, "expression": "((p_70fb89_2 OR p_70fb89_3) OR NOT (p_70fb89_0))", "record_id": "70fb89bcefbcb6e5", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to true
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:272:decision | choice | [
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"active: Current status is active",
"queued: Current status is queued",
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"closed: Current status is closed",
"paused: Current status is paused"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_a19429", "query_property": "sta... | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1629:decision | choice | [
"31: The exact integer result is 31",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"43: The exact integer result is 43",
"40: The exact integer result is 40",
"38: The exact integer result is 38"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "09f01e5b52b55d19", "values": [3, 38, 40, 13, -13, 21], "zero_based_index": 0} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1014:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_54be1a", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: No eligible status record remains
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:769:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_91aea2", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is queued
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1963:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T10:20:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_250026_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T09:34:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_250026_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T03:22:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_250026_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T09:20:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_250026_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:14:00-08:00"... | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_250026_2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:361:decision | choice | [
"-10: The exact integer result is -10",
"-6: The exact integer result is -6",
"2: The exact integer result is 2",
"-3: The exact integer result is -3"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "a01f56f8dabd50d6", "source": "x = -4\nfor item in [-2, -9, -1, 12]:\n if item > -2:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 4\nresult = x * 3\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2217:decision | choice | [
"-6: The exact integer result is -6",
"-11: The exact integer result is -11",
"-8: The exact integer result is -8",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"-9: The exact integer result is -9"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "f683fce148c7d27d", "values": [-5, -8, 23, 34, 9, 6], "zero_based_index": 0} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2209:decision | choice | [
"125: The exact integer result is 125",
"130: The exact integer result is 130",
"127: The exact integer result is 127",
"124: The exact integer result is 124"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "86860b2bc0578255", "source": "x = 12\nfor item in [4, -8, 11, 0]:\n if item > -3:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 2\nresult = x * 5\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:923:decision | choice | [
"paused: Current status is paused",
"closed: Current status is closed",
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"active: Current status is active",
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"queued: Current status is queued"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_5665e8", "query_property": "sta... | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:46:decision | choice | [
"-4: The exact integer result is -4",
"1: The exact integer result is 1",
"-1: The exact integer result is -1",
"0: The exact integer result is 0"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "8e1adc874dc9818c", "source": "x = -3\nfor item in [1, 8, 4, -2]:\n if item > 2:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 5\nresult = x * 1\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2344:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_9ed3d9", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is paused
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:9:decision | choice | [
"47: The exact integer result is 47",
"38: The exact integer result is 38",
"41: The exact integer result is 41",
"36: The exact integer result is 36"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"expression": "a + (b * c)", "record_id": "445becc724524882", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 12, "b": 2, "c": 12}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:699:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_7f1ae5", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is active
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:552:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_84d0bc", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is queued
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1608:decision | choice | [
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"-14: The exact integer result is -14",
"-31: The exact integer result is -31",
"-3: The exact integer result is -3",
"-17: The exact integer result is -17"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "c28281e170b73cf2", "values": [-27, -14, -30, -15, 40, -6], "zero_based_index": 1} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2326:decision | choice | [
"2: The exact integer result is 2",
"-20: The exact integer result is -20",
"-3: The exact integer result is -3",
"8: The exact integer result is 8"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "22bd8acf0308a214", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -1, "b": 14, "c": 11}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:466:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "5ba8b1b2d4a96df2", "source": "x = -11\nfor item in [0, 0, -8, 8]:\n if item > 5:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 5\nresult = x * -1\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 18
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1574:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_03acd0", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is active
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1411:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "2aba10efd694dd62", "source": "x = -5\nfor item in [-6, 10, 12, 1]:\n if item > 3:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 3\nresult = x * -1\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -11
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1666:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_1126fd_0": false, "p_1126fd_1": true, "p_1126fd_2": false, "p_1126fd_3": false}, "expression": "NOT (NOT (p_1126fd_2))", "record_id": "1126fd896dcdabf3", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true and B is false.... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to true
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2276:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["N68081e_0", "N68081e_3"], ["N68081e_2", "N68081e_0"], ["N68081e_2", "N68081e_4"], ["N68081e_3", "N68081e_2"], ["N68081e_4", "N68081e_3"]], "goal": "N68081e_2", "nodes": ["N68081e_0", "N68081e_1", "N68081e_2", "N68081e_3", "N68081e_4"], "record_id": "68081ed9caa11b51", "rules": "Edges are directed.... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: A path exists but no direct edge exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1978:decision | choice | [
"-1: The exact integer result is -1",
"-7: The exact integer result is -7",
"-4: The exact integer result is -4",
"-6: The exact integer result is -6"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "2b8c978cdbb9ca33", "source": "x = -15\nfor item in [-4, 9, 2, 9]:\n if item > 2:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 3\nresult = x * 2\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:248:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T11:16:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_6614a3_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:49:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_6614a3_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T08:14:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_6614a3_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T19:54:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_6614a3_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T12:45:00+02:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_6614a3_2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2214:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "a + (b * c)", "record_id": "1b6cd4eff70e2467", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -14, "b": 14, "c": 9}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 117
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1173:decision | choice | [
"-31: The exact integer result is -31",
"-48: The exact integer result is -48",
"-26: The exact integer result is -26",
"-20: The exact integer result is -20"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "45fcb1bedbb2f233", "source": "x = -4\nfor item in [7, 10, 11, 7]:\n if item > 1:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 6\nresult = x * -1\n"} | What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:294:decision | choice | [
"true: The expression evaluates to true",
"false: The expression evaluates to false"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_80a2f0_0": false, "p_80a2f0_1": false, "p_80a2f0_2": false, "p_80a2f0_3": false}, "expression": "((p_80a2f0_3 AND p_80a2f0_0) AND NOT (p_80a2f0_3))", "record_id": "80a2f0923ff09efd", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only w... | Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1359:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["N1d30a7_0", "N1d30a7_2"], ["N1d30a7_0", "N1d30a7_4"], ["N1d30a7_2", "N1d30a7_0"], ["N1d30a7_3", "N1d30a7_4"]], "goal": "N1d30a7_4", "nodes": ["N1d30a7_0", "N1d30a7_1", "N1d30a7_2", "N1d30a7_3", "N1d30a7_4"], "record_id": "1d30a7ad7251bdca", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoin... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: A path exists but no direct edge exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:768:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "f9ec8baae916bb43", "values": [-17, 35, 0, -6, 17, 2], "zero_based_index": 2} | Task: Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -5
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1181:decision | choice | [
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"-31: The exact integer result is -31",
"-17: The exact integer result is -17",
"-14: The exact integer result is -14",
"-13: The exact integer result is -13"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "7fe02a191cae4ab4", "values": [12, 38, -15, 7, -14, 36], "zero_based_index": 0} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1869:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_188fb8_0": true, "p_188fb8_1": true, "p_188fb8_2": true, "p_188fb8_3": false}, "expression": "((p_188fb8_1 AND p_188fb8_3) OR (p_188fb8_2 AND p_188fb8_3))", "record_id": "188fb80148b21a10", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to false
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:519:decision | choice | [
"unreachable: No directed path exists",
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists"
] | [
0,
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["N967c66_0", "N967c66_1"], ["N967c66_0", "N967c66_2"], ["N967c66_1", "N967c66_0"], ["N967c66_3", "N967c66_1"], ["N967c66_3", "N967c66_4"]], "goal": "N967c66_4", "nodes": ["N967c66_0", "N967c66_1", "N967c66_2", "N967c66_3", "N967c66_4"], "record_id": "967c66a6be0195b6", "rules": "Edges are directed.... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1739:decision | choice | [
"event_482e27_1: Event event_482e27_1",
"event_482e27_2: Event event_482e27_2",
"event_482e27_3: Event event_482e27_3",
"event_482e27_0: Event event_482e27_0"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:40:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_482e27_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T08:52:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_482e27_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T20:36:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_482e27_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:17:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_482e27_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:19:00+09:00"... | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1499:decision | choice | [
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists",
"unreachable: No directed path exists"
] | [
0,
1,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["N568cbf_0", "N568cbf_2"], ["N568cbf_2", "N568cbf_3"], ["N568cbf_3", "N568cbf_0"], ["N568cbf_3", "N568cbf_2"], ["N568cbf_3", "N568cbf_4"]], "goal": "N568cbf_0", "nodes": ["N568cbf_0", "N568cbf_1", "N568cbf_2", "N568cbf_3", "N568cbf_4"], "record_id": "568cbf7890bf7dea", "rules": "Edges are directed.... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:134:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["Nd9acea_0", "Nd9acea_2"], ["Nd9acea_1", "Nd9acea_4"]], "goal": "Nd9acea_3", "nodes": ["Nd9acea_0", "Nd9acea_1", "Nd9acea_2", "Nd9acea_3", "Nd9acea_4"], "record_id": "d9acea8a7d63343a", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoing edges; no unstated edges exist.", "start": "Nd9acea_4"... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: No directed path exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:31:decision | choice | [
"event_ea270c_1: Event event_ea270c_1",
"event_ea270c_0: Event event_ea270c_0",
"event_ea270c_2: Event event_ea270c_2",
"event_ea270c_3: Event event_ea270c_3"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T13:28:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_ea270c_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T05:43:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_ea270c_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T22:41:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_ea270c_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:09:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_ea270c_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:27:00-08:00"... | Which event occurs latest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:419:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_7be61b", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is active
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:635:decision | choice | [
"19: The exact integer result is 19",
"9: The exact integer result is 9",
"8: The exact integer result is 8",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"7: The exact integer result is 7"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "059771ac3398b743", "values": [4, -4, 8, 22, 9, 39], "zero_based_index": 2} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:58:decision | choice | [
"-67: The exact integer result is -67",
"-64: The exact integer result is -64",
"-66: The exact integer result is -66",
"-55: The exact integer result is -55"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "7a7ce39b87f6d25a", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -33, "b": 2, "c": 0}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1697:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T10:50:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_27df2f_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T16:27:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_27df2f_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:51:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_27df2f_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T09:47:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_27df2f_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:04:00-08:00"... | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_27df2f_2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1039:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T11:44:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_8737e3_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T04:24:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_8737e3_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T15:53:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_8737e3_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:14:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_8737e3_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T05:55:00-08:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_8737e3_3
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1069:decision | choice | [
"7: The exact integer result is 7",
"-7: The exact integer result is -7",
"-4: The exact integer result is -4",
"1: The exact integer result is 1",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "57b409593df45254", "values": [-24, -12, 33, -26, -4, 31], "zero_based_index": 3} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1106:decision | choice | [
"false: The expression evaluates to false",
"true: The expression evaluates to true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_fba969_0": false, "p_fba969_1": true, "p_fba969_2": true, "p_fba969_3": true}, "expression": "(NOT (p_fba969_0) AND NOT (p_fba969_3))", "record_id": "fba9692e1425fe1e", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true ... | Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:267:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["Nf60d6e_0", "Nf60d6e_4"], ["Nf60d6e_1", "Nf60d6e_2"], ["Nf60d6e_1", "Nf60d6e_3"], ["Nf60d6e_2", "Nf60d6e_4"], ["Nf60d6e_3", "Nf60d6e_0"], ["Nf60d6e_4", "Nf60d6e_2"]], "goal": "Nf60d6e_3", "nodes": ["Nf60d6e_0", "Nf60d6e_1", "Nf60d6e_2", "Nf60d6e_3", "Nf60d6e_4"], "record_id": "f60d6e6e12cf0c2c", "... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: A direct start-to-goal edge exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:951:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_d2a8d5", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is paused
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1102:decision | choice | [
"event_fa0eab_0: Event event_fa0eab_0",
"event_fa0eab_3: Event event_fa0eab_3",
"event_fa0eab_2: Event event_fa0eab_2",
"event_fa0eab_1: Event event_fa0eab_1"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T13:35:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_fa0eab_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:07:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_fa0eab_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:39:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_fa0eab_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:25:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_fa0eab_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:01:00-08:00"... | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1596:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_6909d0_0": false, "p_6909d0_1": false, "p_6909d0_2": true, "p_6909d0_3": false}, "expression": "((p_6909d0_1 AND p_6909d0_3) AND (p_6909d0_3 OR p_6909d0_2))", "record_id": "6909d019d72b8cab", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is fal... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to true
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1634:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T11:39:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_786bab_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:11:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_786bab_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:56:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_786bab_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T16:42:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_786bab_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:38:00-03:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_786bab_0
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:593:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "f51185cb20a8e3b6", "values": [3, -1, -18, -23, -15, 27], "zero_based_index": 3} | Task: Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly.
Proposed answer: The requested result does not exist
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1458:decision | choice | [
"27: The exact integer result is 27",
"10: The exact integer result is 10",
"26: The exact integer result is 26",
"29: The exact integer result is 29"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"expression": "a + (b * c)", "record_id": "bfff9e780f8f99f8", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -1, "b": 14, "c": 2}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:735:decision | choice | [
"false: The expression evaluates to false",
"true: The expression evaluates to true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_84ad18_0": true, "p_84ad18_1": true, "p_84ad18_2": true, "p_84ad18_3": true}, "expression": "((p_84ad18_1 AND p_84ad18_0) AND NOT (p_84ad18_3))", "record_id": "84ad18221512c7fc", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when ... | Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2069:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"language": "Python 3 integer subset", "record_id": "8cbd8a4ac3c8a424", "source": "x = -9\nfor item in [-3, -6, 12, -6]:\n if item > -1:\n x += item\n else:\n x -= 2\nresult = x * -4\n"} | Task: What exact integer is stored in result after this program finishes?
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is 9
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:335:decision | choice | [
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"active: Current status is active",
"queued: Current status is queued",
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"closed: Current status is closed",
"paused: Current status is paused"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_a1f8a0", "query_property": "sta... | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:209:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_c95080", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is queued
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:885:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T11:20:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_6612bd_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T05:13:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_6612bd_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T04:27:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_6612bd_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T18:03:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_6612bd_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:37:00+09:00"... | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_6612bd_1
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1822:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "d8b4a6c27a6742a2", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -27, "b": 2, "c": 14}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -39
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2283:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["Ne17233_0", "Ne17233_3"], ["Ne17233_0", "Ne17233_4"], ["Ne17233_1", "Ne17233_0"], ["Ne17233_1", "Ne17233_4"], ["Ne17233_2", "Ne17233_1"], ["Ne17233_3", "Ne17233_1"]], "goal": "Ne17233_2", "nodes": ["Ne17233_0", "Ne17233_1", "Ne17233_2", "Ne17233_3", "Ne17233_4"], "record_id": "e172337dd9110099", "... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: A direct start-to-goal edge exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:628:decision | choice | [
"1: The exact integer result is 1",
"13: The exact integer result is 13",
"5: The exact integer result is 5",
"8: The exact integer result is 8",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "dcfa0181e0c82d1b", "values": [39, -30, -3, -4, 29, 8], "zero_based_index": 2} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:271:decision | choice | [
"-27: The exact integer result is -27",
"-36: The exact integer result is -36",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"-38: The exact integer result is -38",
"-37: The exact integer result is -37"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "919c72dc42befd56", "values": [-38, 6, -33, 31, -30, -15], "zero_based_index": 0} | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:583:decision | choice | [
"-36: The exact integer result is -36",
"-46: The exact integer result is -46",
"-47: The exact integer result is -47",
"-48: The exact integer result is -48"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"expression": "a + (b * c)", "record_id": "bd4663941d9024b1", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -2, "b": 15, "c": -3}} | Calculate the exact expression result. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1081:decision | choice | [
"event_2a3c84_1: Event event_2a3c84_1",
"event_2a3c84_2: Event event_2a3c84_2",
"event_2a3c84_3: Event event_2a3c84_3",
"event_2a3c84_0: Event event_2a3c84_0"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:32:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_2a3c84_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:03:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_2a3c84_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T21:18:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_2a3c84_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:11:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_2a3c84_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:32:00+02:00"... | Which event occurs latest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1483:decision | choice | [
"active: Current status is active",
"queued: Current status is queued",
"paused: Current status is paused",
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"closed: Current status is closed"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_3f7a30", "query_property": "sta... | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:321:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_589586", "query_property": "sta... | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1575:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_6e1488_0": false, "p_6e1488_1": true, "p_6e1488_2": false, "p_6e1488_3": true}, "expression": "((p_6e1488_1 AND p_6e1488_0) OR (p_6e1488_0 AND p_6e1488_2))", "record_id": "6e148891ca169763", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is fals... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to false
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2295:decision | choice | [
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"closed: Current status is closed",
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"active: Current status is active",
"queued: Current status is queued",
"paused: Current status is paused"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_6aaf9b", "query_property": "sta... | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:415:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "a + (b * c)", "record_id": "24d2c1adef7d55ab", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 0, "b": 14, "c": -19}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -261
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1178:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"expression": "(a * b) + c", "record_id": "372e46f6b8f5e160", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": -18, "b": 16, "c": -4}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -292
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1361:decision | choice | [
"event_8d24c5_1: Event event_8d24c5_1",
"event_8d24c5_3: Event event_8d24c5_3",
"event_8d24c5_0: Event event_8d24c5_0",
"event_8d24c5_2: Event event_8d24c5_2"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:26:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_8d24c5_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T23:46:00+09:00"}, {"id": "event_8d24c5_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T03:26:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_8d24c5_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T08:40:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_8d24c5_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:04:00+02:00"... | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1632:decision | choice | [
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"unreachable: No directed path exists"
] | [
0,
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["N2330c7_0", "N2330c7_4"], ["N2330c7_3", "N2330c7_2"]], "goal": "N2330c7_4", "nodes": ["N2330c7_0", "N2330c7_1", "N2330c7_2", "N2330c7_3", "N2330c7_4"], "record_id": "2330c759b33f56e0", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoing edges; no unstated edges exist.", "start": "N2330c7_1"... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1976:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"expression": "(a - b) * c", "record_id": "45635630fec0ba6d", "semantics": "Use exact Python integer arithmetic. // floors toward negative infinity; % is Python remainder.", "values": {"a": 14, "b": 4, "c": 1}} | Task: Calculate the exact expression result.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -7
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:15:decision | choice | [
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"unreachable: No directed path exists"
] | [
0,
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["N94137e_1", "N94137e_2"], ["N94137e_2", "N94137e_1"]], "goal": "N94137e_4", "nodes": ["N94137e_0", "N94137e_1", "N94137e_2", "N94137e_3", "N94137e_4"], "record_id": "94137ee9016d59ae", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoing edges; no unstated edges exist.", "start": "N94137e_3"... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2243:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:32:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_b0ed42_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:41:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_b0ed42_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:07:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_b0ed42_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T02:36:00-08:00"}, {"id": "event_b0ed42_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T15:30:00+02:00"... | Task: Which event occurs latest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_b0ed42_1
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:911:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"directed_edges": [["N05b97d_1", "N05b97d_2"], ["N05b97d_2", "N05b97d_3"], ["N05b97d_3", "N05b97d_4"], ["N05b97d_4", "N05b97d_1"], ["N05b97d_4", "N05b97d_2"], ["N05b97d_4", "N05b97d_3"]], "goal": "N05b97d_3", "nodes": ["N05b97d_0", "N05b97d_1", "N05b97d_2", "N05b97d_3", "N05b97d_4"], "record_id": "05b97da5878255e8", "... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: No directed path exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:974:decision | choice | [
"unreachable: No directed path exists",
"direct: A direct start-to-goal edge exists",
"indirect: A path exists but no direct edge exists"
] | [
1,
0,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["Ne2c52b_1", "Ne2c52b_3"], ["Ne2c52b_3", "Ne2c52b_1"], ["Ne2c52b_3", "Ne2c52b_2"]], "goal": "Ne2c52b_1", "nodes": ["Ne2c52b_0", "Ne2c52b_1", "Ne2c52b_2", "Ne2c52b_3", "Ne2c52b_4"], "record_id": "e2c52bbf2863981e", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoing edges; no unstated edges e... | Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists. | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:631:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"directed_edges": [["N45714f_1", "N45714f_0"], ["N45714f_1", "N45714f_3"], ["N45714f_2", "N45714f_4"], ["N45714f_4", "N45714f_0"]], "goal": "N45714f_4", "nodes": ["N45714f_0", "N45714f_1", "N45714f_2", "N45714f_3", "N45714f_4"], "record_id": "45714f8d86ac23e6", "rules": "Edges are directed. Follow zero or more outgoin... | Task: Classify how the goal can be reached from start. Prefer direct when a single edge exists.
Proposed answer: A path exists but no direct edge exists
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:1984:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T10:38:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_e44d4d_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T09:31:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_e44d4d_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T07:56:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_e44d4d_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:44:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_e44d4d_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:58:00-03:00"... | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_e44d4d_2
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2478:verification | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_bd1f1f_0": false, "p_bd1f1f_1": true, "p_bd1f1f_2": false, "p_bd1f1f_3": true}, "expression": "((p_bd1f1f_0 AND p_bd1f1f_3) AND (p_bd1f1f_2 OR p_bd1f1f_3))", "record_id": "bd1f1fea521cebb2", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is fals... | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to true
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | reasoning-control-v1 | openjev | openjev_v2 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
JEV corpus - reasoning-control-v1
4,085 typed calibrated decision rows from the jev-distill-corpus-v3 corpus (domain: reasoning-control-v1).
Each row is one typed decision: kind (noul / choice / score), a state, a question, options, and a target probability distribution over the options.
Part of the per-domain split of SargeDev/jev-distill-corpus-v3 - the full corpus in one repo.
Domains:
- Downloads last month
- -