Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
stringlengths
21
21
kind
stringclasses
3 values
options
listlengths
2
6
target
listlengths
2
6
state
stringlengths
171
246
question
stringclasses
7 values
domain
stringclasses
1 value
family
stringclasses
1 value
source
stringclasses
1 value
v3_921379c0e530be54_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.03, 0.03, 0.05, 0.27, 0.57, 0.05 ]
A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: at the thesis defense, mid-incident. Reported by the automated check.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_b3927949ca4e9c71_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.45, 0.55 ]
An observed correlation reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: for a grant review, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8e5e44806cffbc0b_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.25, 0.74, 0, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the monitoring system.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_ccf40f8ad3cd4e0c_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.02, 0.4, 0.58, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, during peak load. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f49dcb68ae674c72_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.08, 0.26, 0.36, 0.27, 0.02 ]
A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for a grant review, mid-incident. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8b387e435a588e28_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.88, 0.12 ]
A proposed mechanism requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: at the thesis defense, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_1c074a11b0185083_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.76, 0.23, 0.01, 0 ]
An observed correlation predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for the press release, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the supervisor.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f4c8fbbda40ca67b_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.05, 0.05, 0.27, 0.5, 0.12, 0.01 ]
A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_e47e7126a3eaa197_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.22, 0.78 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, during the morning shift. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_dabc9bbe9c19aeda_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.64, 0.36 ]
A proposed mechanism reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: at the thesis defense, immediately after go-live. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_e1d85e0de3af235a_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.24, 0.03, 0.55, 0.18 ]
A proposed mechanism has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_823ce5508f4970db_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.02, 0.4, 0.56, 0.02 ]
An observed correlation requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, immediately after go-live. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_45d2feb2c1001c42_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.14, 0.24, 0.31, 0.22, 0.08, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_3d37906e56f857b0_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.91, 0.09 ]
A proposed mechanism explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f9db6260186531ad_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.04, 0.06, 0.84, 0.06 ]
An observed correlation explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_454af686cfb8bdaf_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.79, 0.21 ]
A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_b6e471102ff8ead2_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.12, 0.23, 0.28, 0.26, 0.09, 0.02 ]
An observed correlation explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: at the thesis defense, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the operator.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_eb953ab3ef091e05_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.16, 0.84 ]
A predictive model survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_80ab91df51694c85_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.59, 0.41 ]
A predictive model requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for the press release, during peak load. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_17ca8ad52877a316_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.58, 0.42 ]
A proposed mechanism reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: in the journal club, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_5dcde1ceb257eea0_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.08, 0.02, 0.71, 0.19 ]
A hypothesis postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, under reduced staffing. Reported by the review queue.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f14e64f4bd6bae8d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.1, 0.13, 0.11, 0.37, 0.24, 0.05 ]
A predictive model is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_9bcf0c1173e7f629_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.67, 0.33 ]
A hypothesis explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_86890f39cc660dc8_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.38, 0.62 ]
An observed correlation relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: for the press release, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_551b89dbfc52377f_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.84, 0.16 ]
A predictive model explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_aaef30c1ff9bbd68_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.01, 0.07, 0.45, 0.45, 0.01 ]
A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_fdca00d869c82efa_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.07, 0.27, 0.28, 0.3, 0.07, 0.01 ]
A predictive model is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for a grant review, during the system migration. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_c24b2f86a1c336dd_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.02, 0.2, 0.36, 0.36, 0.05, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: at the thesis defense, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_b288b8b079cd0de0_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.02, 0.26, 0.7, 0.02 ]
An observed correlation makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: in the journal club, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the operator.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_91ec7023a086dd8a_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.12, 0.08, 0.11, 0.48, 0.2, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_34bc65b940f184ae_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.86, 0.14 ]
A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, during the system migration. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_4f00e7c5c7171462_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.1, 0.09, 0.17, 0.26, 0.34, 0.04 ]
A proposed mechanism explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, immediately after go-live. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_668b7d184cd0aad3_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.88, 0.12 ]
A proposed mechanism relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: for a grant review, under an active deadline. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_0d379257433b00be_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.14, 0.71, 0.02, 0.13 ]
An observed correlation requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_cbe8cb75e5359acc_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0, 0.48, 0.52, 0 ]
A hypothesis explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the review queue.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_12e4e4b55c055ebe_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.07, 0.09, 0.08, 0.3, 0.42, 0.04 ]
An observed correlation requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: at the thesis defense, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the automated check.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_9bda57529422533b_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.49, 0.42, 0.08, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: in the journal club, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the supervisor.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_391de218a986c03e_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.35, 0.12, 0.01, 0.52 ]
An observed correlation is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: in the journal club, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8b00cfeb687d329d_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.03, 0.86, 0.11, 0 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_cffcc2ba66c060cb_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.03, 0.06, 0.13, 0.26, 0.46, 0.06 ]
A hypothesis survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_ec724e4d0e10e0cb_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.02, 0.54, 0.44, 0 ]
An observed correlation has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, mid-incident. Reported by the monitoring system.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_874d779684283d80_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.04, 0.32, 0.58, 0.06 ]
A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for the press release, during an external partner integration. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8b78ea3ed947dbc4_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.5, 0.5 ]
A hypothesis makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: at the thesis defense, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_6837b018cb3f4c8c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.14, 0.12, 0.31, 0.38, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: in the journal club, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_0b37063d5f197ef0_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.04, 0.03, 0.7, 0.23 ]
A hypothesis explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for the press release, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_3e10abef76b1c169_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.02, 0.31, 0.64, 0.03 ]
A hypothesis postulates an undetectable medium; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for a grant review, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the operator.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_e524f32d0b2bd9f9_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.47, 0.53 ]
A predictive model survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, immediately after go-live. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_93dabed265c122f1_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.73, 0.21, 0.06, 0 ]
A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: in the journal club, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8da0c9bd0322029c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.23, 0.23, 0.11, 0.26, 0.14, 0.03 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, during normal operations. Reported by the operator.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_2eacae7898cc8471_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.38, 0.62 ]
An observed correlation is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: in the journal club, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_727df6fcf2155dd4_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.37, 0.63 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: in the journal club, immediately after go-live. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_188949afce8abc5f_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.13, 0.16, 0.24, 0.37, 0.09, 0.01 ]
A proposed mechanism is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: at the thesis defense, during the system migration. Reported by the automated check.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_d2929e272de6497d_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.01, 0.35, 0.64, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_c394c055af579d6c_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.59, 0.41 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_cf25cf58581a4da7_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.31, 0.68, 0.01, 0 ]
A hypothesis makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: at the thesis defense, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f221e7505dfd0d11_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.2, 0.35, 0.15, 0.25, 0.04, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the automated check.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_74cdcf04a4fda3ad_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.49, 0.5, 0.01, 0 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: for the press release, under an active deadline. Reported by the monitoring system.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_7e35d01c5cdd2463_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.04, 0.25, 0.49, 0.2, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: for a grant review, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the automated check.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_933547979d8c63d7_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.77, 0.23 ]
A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for a grant review, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_bbee4b07ce71cf50_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.09, 0.83, 0.08, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: in the journal club, during the quarterly review. Reported by the review queue.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_2b35b62d6c8ec711_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.17, 0.25, 0.3, 0.2, 0.06, 0.02 ]
A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_3e5b1e8b399c29ec_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.58, 0.42 ]
A proposed mechanism survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: at the thesis defense, during peak load. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_80c1c6da5808923f_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.05, 0.07, 0.13, 0.35, 0.37, 0.03 ]
A hypothesis postulates an undetectable medium; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: at the thesis defense, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_50d5a926fd031c5a_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.81, 0.19 ]
A hypothesis has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: in the journal club, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_8379018e170dbfa3_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.43, 0.57 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f6185f252539612d_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.48, 0.31, 0.19, 0.02 ]
A hypothesis makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: in the journal club, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the monitoring system.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_43a888ec41447ae5_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.43, 0.57 ]
An observed correlation reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_fcd5a633bfc1c857_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.57, 0.31, 0.12, 0 ]
A predictive model relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for a grant review, under an active deadline. Reported by the review queue.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_69c9f9c64368b6c5_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.71, 0.29 ]
A predictive model requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_e8761c8bc4b9a523_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.3, 0.47, 0.05, 0.18 ]
A proposed mechanism survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: for a grant review, during normal operations. Reported by the review queue.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_9dc5fa52c4efe6cb_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.9, 0.1 ]
An observed correlation explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: at the thesis defense, during peak load. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_ead4e334d514c361_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.48, 0.33, 0.16, 0.03 ]
A predictive model survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: for the press release, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the monitoring system.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_b06ed2be4ef6b1c5_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.02, 0.93, 0.05, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: in the journal club, during an external partner integration. Reported by the review queue.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_1db87b833fed14e8_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.08, 0.07, 0.1, 0.52, 0.22, 0.01 ]
A hypothesis has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for a grant review, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the automated check.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_f3c3c233971851de_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.14, 0.18, 0.29, 0.32, 0.06, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation has a circular dependency in its assumptions; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: for a grant review, during the system migration. Reported by the review queue.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_e8341fdbab1805a1_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.3333, 0.5455, 0.1111, 0.0101 ]
A predictive model survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally postulates an undetectable medium. Context: for the press release, during normal operations. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_ecfae306bdef8d33_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.16, 0.11, 0.38, 0.31, 0.03, 0.01 ]
A hypothesis is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for the press release, during the quarterly review. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_6b21fd1a1558e7fe_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.13, 0.22, 0.22, 0.27, 0.13, 0.03 ]
A hypothesis explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: at the thesis defense, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_cc6058933795f5f9_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.15, 0.73, 0.11, 0.01 ]
A predictive model requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, under an active deadline. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_1a6b105984c92e5d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.13, 0.09, 0.21, 0.36, 0.2, 0.01 ]
A proposed mechanism explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: for a grant review, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_4e7914f96b93f3bf_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.72, 0.14, 0.01, 0.13 ]
A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: at the thesis defense, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_dc2e892acb163c5f_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.27, 0.73 ]
An observed correlation makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: at the thesis defense, during an external partner integration. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_a5d98e954df8dee6_c
choice
[ "replicate", "design_falsification_test", "abandon", "fund_fully" ]
[ 0.66, 0.29, 0.05, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for a grant review, under reduced staffing. Reported by the automated check.
Next step for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_35923327e32c9527_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.65, 0.35 ]
A hypothesis postulates an undetectable medium; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: in the journal club, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_eab7303ea50c0db8_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.21, 0.53, 0.25, 0.01 ]
An observed correlation makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for the press release, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the review queue.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_d78fbca79e7944bf_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.45, 0.55 ]
A proposed mechanism makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor. Context: for the press release, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_4f819b236e4738c4_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.69, 0.31 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: at the thesis defense, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_0254ef73eaf0baaf_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.36, 0.64 ]
An observed correlation postulates an undetectable medium; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: at the thesis defense, during peak load. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: a confound explains the result?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_d2929e272de6497d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.09, 0.08, 0.1, 0.48, 0.23, 0.02 ]
A proposed mechanism requires a new particle with no decay signature; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: in the journal club, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_29820e5e24e1fbc7_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.23, 0.38, 0.19, 0.13, 0.05, 0.02 ]
A predictive model explains all observations but forbids no outcome; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: at the thesis defense, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_bcaba9b3a072961e_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.21, 0.23, 0.13, 0.35, 0.06, 0.02 ]
A hypothesis is supported by 4 independent replications; additionally reduces to the known theory in the limit. Context: in the journal club, during the system migration. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_44643d7118da6e5a_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.07, 0.4, 0.52, 0.01 ]
A proposed mechanism reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally explains all observations but forbids no outcome. Context: in the journal club, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the review queue.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_d20a5f7cc326010b_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.09, 0.84, 0.07, 0 ]
A hypothesis relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: in the journal club, during the morning shift. Reported by the review queue.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_4abcef60be92938f_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.31, 0.69 ]
A predictive model reduces to the known theory in the limit; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, under an active deadline. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_595e1e19ddeb36ae_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.28, 0.72 ]
A hypothesis predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally survived a preregistered adversarial test. Context: for a grant review, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_2736514b6bdcf013_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.5, 0.5 ]
A hypothesis relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally is supported by 4 independent replications. Context: for a grant review, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the evidence supports the claim?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_cb5856c165d5bcb1_c
choice
[ "strongly_supported", "tentatively_supported", "unsupported", "contradicted" ]
[ 0.03, 0.18, 0.72, 0.07 ]
A proposed mechanism predicts a 15% effect with a 3% measured noise floor; additionally requires a new particle with no decay signature. Context: for the press release, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Verdict for this scenario.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_768c8fbb52c8f38c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.17, 0.49, 0.3, 0.03, 0 ]
A proposed mechanism relies on a single unblinded observation; additionally makes a novel falsifiable prediction. Context: for the press release, during normal operations. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate evidence strength for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_794ec1aa944f2239_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.09, 0.16, 0.28, 0.33, 0.12, 0.02 ]
A hypothesis makes a novel falsifiable prediction; additionally has a circular dependency in its assumptions. Context: for a grant review, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the review queue.
Rate novelty for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
v3_5debf4498610dd5a_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.24, 0.76 ]
An observed correlation survived a preregistered adversarial test; additionally relies on a single unblinded observation. Context: for the press release, during the morning shift. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the hypothesis is falsifiable?
hypothesis_eval
science
yuri_v3
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

JEV corpus - hypothesis_eval

7,884 typed calibrated decision rows from the jev-distill-corpus-v3 corpus (domain: hypothesis_eval).

Each row is one typed decision: kind (noul / choice / score), a state, a question, options, and a target probability distribution over the options.

Part of the per-domain split of SargeDev/jev-distill-corpus-v3 - the full corpus in one repo.

Domains:

Downloads last month
27