id stringlengths 21 21 | kind stringclasses 3
values | options listlengths 2 6 | target listlengths 2 6 | state stringlengths 152 248 | question stringclasses 7
values | domain stringclasses 1
value | family stringclasses 1
value | source stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v3_649cb60343c9452c_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.01,
0.05,
0.41,
0.51,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the audited section, shortly after a software update. Reported by the review queue. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_91d534fb721c8051_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.05,
0.95
] | A claim in the report cites a retracted paper; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: on the public-facing page, under reduced staffing. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_7f4484cc40817306_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.46,
0.54
] | A claim in the report matches the primary source exactly; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the executive summary, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e12f38eeccfce26e_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.01,
0.05,
0.53,
0.38,
0.01
] | A claim in the report attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the executive summary, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d545239cb42fa50e_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.93,
0.07
] | A historical assertion conflates correlation with causation; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: on the public-facing page, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_dfd50f4ad91e4700_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.42,
0.58
] | A cited figure rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the executive summary, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_069d6ad223eb517e_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.41,
0.43,
0.13,
0.01
] | A claim in the report matches the primary source exactly; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the executive summary, during peak load. Reported by the automated check. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e7d1750f5803bd1d_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.01,
0.98
] | A statistic in the draft cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_014674c9ec206f53_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.01,
0.12,
0.51,
0.34,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the appendix, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_611a6c2f5484560d_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0,
0.06,
0.81,
0.12
] | A cited figure attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: on the public-facing page, following a recent audit. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_30b7da347d48da32_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.16,
0.47,
0.36,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft conflates correlation with causation; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the audited section, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the operator. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_def4bd08d433acce_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.45,
0.01,
0.47,
0.07
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_45fd6bcaa0f79310_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.07,
0.2,
0.58,
0.13,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft agrees with two independent sources; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the appendix, during peak load. Reported by the review queue. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_716a9962cbf4b06b_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.65,
0.05,
0.29,
0.01
] | A claim in the report quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the executive summary, shortly after a software update. Reported by the review queue. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_4a269b831fc42f57_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.01,
0.07,
0.8,
0.12,
0
] | A historical assertion rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: on the public-facing page, under reduced staffing. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_2729f4cb99763687_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.4,
0.39,
0.11,
0.1
] | A statistic in the draft matches the primary source exactly; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the executive summary, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the automated check. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_3edf35baf30276e5_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.42,
0.01,
0.57,
0
] | A statistic in the draft cites a retracted paper; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: in the audited section, shortly after a software update. Reported by the automated check. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_cc78ac67a2a4dfc5_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.01,
0.98,
0.01,
0
] | A claim in the report uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the review queue. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_16960c6b1f673128_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.11,
0.89
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the appendix, during the quarterly review. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8fff4be3ccf50b3d_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.57,
0.43
] | A historical assertion rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8bde01dac987080c_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.9,
0.1
] | A statistic in the draft cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: on the public-facing page, during an external partner integration. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b09b149dc0546038_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.17,
0.83
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_faa5474923b34811_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.45,
0.16,
0.38,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft conflates correlation with causation; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the appendix, during the quarterly review. Reported by the operator. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_cc9e2d80e33f1330_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.67,
0.33
] | A historical assertion agrees with two independent sources; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: on the public-facing page, under an active deadline. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e64f950374023409_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.83,
0.17
] | A historical assertion conflates correlation with causation; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the appendix, during peak load. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_464077d68066f599_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.01,
0.23,
0.73,
0.02
] | A historical assertion cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the audited section, under reduced staffing. Reported by the review queue. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_ef9431c9a0c77c65_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.78,
0.22
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: in the audited section, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_4ad8d7cc15329388_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.35,
0.25,
0.33,
0.05,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: on the public-facing page, shortly after a software update. Reported by the operator. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d343d4ee6f374045_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.01,
0.03,
0.42,
0.51,
0.01
] | A cited figure conflates correlation with causation; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: in the appendix, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the review queue. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_1f691e860084db8f_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.11,
0.89
] | A cited figure is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the appendix, during the quarterly review. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_6568cd403bc85d78_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0.01,
0.45,
0.54,
0
] | A statistic in the draft attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the audited section, under reduced staffing. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_568e41fb10b26fd6_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.91,
0.09
] | A statistic in the draft rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the executive summary, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_40569c3719a327f0_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.46,
0.54
] | A statistic in the draft matches the primary source exactly; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: on the public-facing page, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_9daaf9f2caeb364d_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.94,
0.02,
0.01,
0.03
] | A statistic in the draft rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, during normal operations. Reported by the operator. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_2ba7e4b2853a9dcf_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.86,
0.03,
0.1,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the audited section, under reduced staffing. Reported by the operator. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_a8e4fe12ab6d1276_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.89,
0.11
] | A claim in the report matches the primary source exactly; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_05cea1a5c2399a67_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.03,
0.25,
0.61,
0.1,
0.01
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: on the public-facing page, shortly after a software update. Reported by the automated check. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_5b7d17784fa0f8ed_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.04,
0.95,
0.01,
0
] | A statistic in the draft uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the executive summary, immediately after go-live. Reported by the monitoring system. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b6023fc1ada11885_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.09,
0.21,
0.09,
0.41,
0.15,
0.05
] | A historical assertion is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, under reduced staffing. Reported by the automated check. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8c61ae02a50fd65a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.01,
0.02,
0.23,
0.68,
0.05
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, during an external partner integration. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_dd93cecc62a10f4b_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.17,
0.81
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: in the audited section, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the supervisor. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_6f34aae2c7a48d5a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.14,
0.45,
0.37,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the appendix, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b11cf1bfd08dbf13_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.06,
0.23,
0.45,
0.23,
0.01
] | A cited figure is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the audited section, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_08ef2aa2de08e0b7_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.65,
0.35
] | A statistic in the draft quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the executive summary, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_98877143670e932a_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.29,
0.29,
0.29,
0.13
] | A cited figure rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the audited section, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_ecf452a0c8c08dd2_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.75,
0.25
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the appendix, under an active deadline. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_845a71f598072f20_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.03,
0.1,
0.75,
0.12
] | A cited figure cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: on the public-facing page, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_378146a0c109b3ab_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.1,
0,
0,
0.9
] | A historical assertion rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the executive summary, shortly after a software update. Reported by the supervisor. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8f4be1606e92d97e_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.78,
0,
0.21,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the audited section, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the operator. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d3ae221be61cd3c3_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.2,
0.57,
0.2,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft agrees with two independent sources; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: in the executive summary, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d87d56daf01957f9_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.07,
0.72,
0.17,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the appendix, shortly after a software update. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_3898cc91e9ae8622_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.21,
0.79
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the appendix, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_f8620cf13dd06c03_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.07,
0.93
] | A historical assertion conflates correlation with causation; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the audited section, under reduced staffing. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_13c91c2650b6abb9_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.61,
0.39
] | A claim in the report quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the audited section, during the system migration. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e4777289c9845421_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.03,
0.26,
0.66,
0.05,
0
] | A statistic in the draft quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_a2b3bc8d3b930710_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.07,
0.35,
0.48,
0.07,
0.01
] | A claim in the report quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the audited section, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_13efdbe2db269cb4_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.09,
0.91
] | A historical assertion attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the executive summary, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_2d918f4a4f633f45_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.93,
0.07
] | A statistic in the draft cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the executive summary, mid-incident. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_7fdfa7eda0c550ce_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.97,
0,
0.01,
0.02
] | A claim in the report rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the executive summary, mid-incident. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e35351215f9769a0_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.78,
0.22
] | A historical assertion quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the executive summary, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b23165a8f5c414aa_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.23,
0.77
] | A historical assertion rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, following a recent audit. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d6c57567a780aaa9_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.52,
0,
0.47,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the appendix, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_fc4f687db08e9cb9_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.91,
0.09
] | A cited figure cites a retracted paper; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the audited section, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_7878f81b4a8f427e_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.09,
0,
0.24,
0.67
] | A claim in the report cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, immediately after go-live. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_2f6c764fbf5d323a_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.03,
0.22,
0.03,
0.72
] | A statistic in the draft matches the primary source exactly; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, shortly after a software update. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_f73962c9f12fae6a_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0,
0.01,
0.44,
0.54,
0.01
] | A statistic in the draft cites a retracted paper; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the executive summary, under reduced staffing. Reported by the review queue. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_83bbbd6f639cc70c_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.09,
0.34,
0.49,
0.05
] | A historical assertion is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: on the public-facing page, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the operator. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b11cf1bfd08dbf13_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.16,
0.84
] | A cited figure is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the audited section, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_77626bc49110a493_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.05,
0.95
] | A statistic in the draft conflates correlation with causation; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_84294f5f50472c2e_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.01,
0.22,
0.74,
0.02
] | A claim in the report uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the audited section, immediately after go-live. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_05ada9f638807550_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.01,
0.04,
0.51,
0.42,
0.01
] | A historical assertion uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: on the public-facing page, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the supervisor. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_45ee26d108803578_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.57,
0.43
] | A cited figure agrees with two independent sources; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, during the system migration. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d213316db9ed8885_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.25,
0.75
] | A cited figure is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the audited section, during the system migration. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_5703f94ff6f9ddb5_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.94,
0.06
] | A cited figure cites a retracted paper; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: on the public-facing page, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the citation supports the claim? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_b0f798c86a633402_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.04,
0.15,
0.77,
0.04,
0
] | A claim in the report rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the review queue. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8e28f0fa425f7274_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.13,
0.87
] | A historical assertion cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the appendix, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_83716f85343f6418_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.19,
0.36,
0.34,
0.08,
0.01
] | A historical assertion matches the primary source exactly; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the audited section, immediately after go-live. Reported by the review queue. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_e4509afae1315e8b_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.36,
0.59,
0.03,
0
] | A claim in the report uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the operator. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_416820dfa89755bd_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.21,
0.66,
0.11,
0
] | A statistic in the draft uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the appendix, under an active deadline. Reported by the operator. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_3ba7a18a9032a924_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.02,
0.38,
0.58,
0.01
] | A cited figure cites a retracted paper; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the audited section, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d7e69e27c488b7ef_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.88,
0.12
] | A statistic in the draft cites a retracted paper; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the appendix, during peak load. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_c0c1b1741da7e828_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.08,
0.92
] | A historical assertion cites a retracted paper; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, following a recent audit. Reported by the automated check. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8448ab41e5acb6cf_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.55,
0.45
] | A cited figure matches the primary source exactly; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the appendix, during peak load. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: the claim is factually accurate? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_3f8335f18d8000f4_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.03,
0.16,
0.56,
0.24,
0.01
] | A cited figure agrees with two independent sources; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, under an active deadline. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_29b3a575b31cd536_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.02,
0.21,
0.59,
0.17,
0.01
] | A historical assertion agrees with two independent sources; additionally cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide. Context: in the appendix, during normal operations. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_2eb7b51a720a7fa5_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.11,
0.7,
0.16,
0
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally conflates correlation with causation. Context: in the executive summary, during peak load. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_0b35bf908ae2d096_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.02,
0.08,
0.47,
0.4,
0.01
] | A historical assertion rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the automated check. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_038122513403af29_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.01,
0.02,
0.23,
0.68,
0.04
] | A statistic in the draft attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally cites a retracted paper. Context: in the appendix, during the morning shift. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_4f50ed221a8afd3b_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.01,
0.02,
0.93,
0.04
] | A statistic in the draft cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the audited section, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_399efe3d1eeba1a9_c | choice | [
"supported",
"partially_supported",
"unsupported",
"contradicted"
] | [
0.86,
0.1,
0.04,
0
] | A claim in the report is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the executive summary, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the operator. | Verdict for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_4473b511fa2859a4_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.12,
0.88
] | A claim in the report rounds 14.2% up to 15%; additionally uses 2019 data labeled as current. Context: in the audited section, shortly after a software update. Reported by the monitoring system. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d91a097288d220c2_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0,
0.01,
0.21,
0.5,
0.27,
0.01
] | A cited figure cites a retracted paper; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the monitoring system. | Rate source quality for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_cd9fa0a4745ce0cb_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.49,
0.51
] | A historical assertion agrees with two independent sources; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the appendix, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_050d66e4a90f5f30_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.35,
0,
0.65,
0
] | A claim in the report attributes to a study that says the opposite; additionally matches the primary source exactly. Context: in the audited section, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the review queue. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_8995bff72eeff91d_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0.32,
0.44,
0.2,
0.03,
0
] | A statistic in the draft matches the primary source exactly; additionally rounds 14.2% up to 15%. Context: in the executive summary, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_7bce9ba302eb4da7_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.01,
0,
0.03,
0.54,
0.42,
0
] | A claim in the report cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the appendix, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the on-call engineer. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_d5ed5acb57c1e2fc_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.34,
0.66
] | A cited figure uses 2019 data labeled as current; additionally agrees with two independent sources. Context: in the audited section, following a recent audit. Reported by the review queue. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_5d912a51b38ef085_n | noul | [
"false",
"true"
] | [
0.12,
0.88
] | A historical assertion cites an internal survey of 12 people as industry-wide; additionally is a direct quote from the CEO. Context: in the executive summary, during the morning shift. Reported by the supervisor. | Is this scenario one where: this needs a correction? | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_aecab9df626f47e5_s | score | [
"0",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5"
] | [
0.02,
0.04,
0.12,
0.42,
0.37,
0.03
] | A cited figure is a direct quote from the CEO; additionally quotes a paywalled source verbatim. Context: in the executive summary, under an active deadline. Reported by the review queue. | Rate claim reliability for this scenario on a 0-5 scale. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
v3_fab5b7576939be32_c | choice | [
"factual_error",
"outdated",
"misattribution",
"overgeneralization"
] | [
0.29,
0,
0.71,
0
] | A cited figure quotes a paywalled source verbatim; additionally attributes to a study that says the opposite. Context: on the public-facing page, under an active deadline. Reported by the monitoring system. | Issue type for this scenario. | fact_checking | knowledge | yuri_v3 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
JEV corpus - fact_checking
9,660 typed calibrated decision rows from the jev-distill-corpus-v3 corpus (domain: fact_checking).
Each row is one typed decision: kind (noul / choice / score), a state, a question, options, and a target probability distribution over the options.
Part of the per-domain split of SargeDev/jev-distill-corpus-v3 - the full corpus in one repo.
Domains:
- Downloads last month
- 30