Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
stringlengths
21
21
kind
stringclasses
3 values
options
listlengths
2
6
target
listlengths
2
6
state
stringlengths
172
273
question
stringclasses
7 values
domain
stringclasses
1 value
family
stringclasses
1 value
source
stringclasses
1 value
v3_8a563b6a79e041d2_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.15, 0.78, 0, 0.07 ]
A systematic position affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during the quarterly review. Reported by the operator.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_e8bcdcb7972f23e1_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.17, 0, 0.01, 0.82 ]
A doctrinal claim follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_999de0f36a4a4f15_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.02, 0.22, 0.08, 0.32, 0.35 ]
A sermon assertion follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_2bdb767babdcbad1_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.03, 0.22, 0.24, 0.39, 0.08 ]
A confessional statement uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, mid-incident. Reported by the operator.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_49b0efa01a6eb919_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.69, 0.11, 0.09, 0.11 ]
A confessional statement uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_1e91640ad3a4027a_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.58, 0.05, 0.17, 0.2 ]
A systematic position holds two natures in one person; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the operator.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_465ab770cff94366_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.6, 0.4 ]
A doctrinal claim uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, shortly after a software update. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_a05a3c749eb47834_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.14, 0.05, 0.16, 0.14, 0.31, 0.2 ]
A sermon assertion asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: per the standard systematic categories, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_13a113184ebc4904_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.25, 0.75 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, under reduced staffing. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_521237f5f5d3e23d_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.32, 0.68 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: under the Augsburg confession, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_c1f0270974ed6238_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.31, 0.32, 0.05, 0.13, 0.07, 0.12 ]
A confessional statement holds two natures in one person; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_e7026b860720e022_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.06, 0.2, 0.34, 0.23, 0.13, 0.04 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the quarterly review. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_4d6d236cc58d1ed9_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.09, 0.04, 0.35, 0.18, 0.27, 0.07 ]
A doctrinal claim denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_f3d8fe14fb72aeec_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.02, 0.02, 0.08, 0.24, 0.55, 0.09 ]
A sermon assertion asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during the holiday freeze. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_75c8f67e5e739750_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.28, 0.23, 0.13, 0.24, 0.08, 0.04 ]
A doctrinal claim holds two natures in one person; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during an external partner integration. Reported by the operator.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_a1ae7c5ec36b5a7d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.21, 0.06, 0.13, 0.16, 0.28, 0.16 ]
A doctrinal claim holds two natures in one person; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_2fe810b7b575f39e_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.01, 0.75, 0, 0.24 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_063fa187c1260558_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.6, 0.4 ]
A doctrinal claim rejects the filioque clause; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: under the Augsburg confession, shortly after a software update. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_d04be6df4c87e9e2_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.05, 0.06, 0.22, 0.37, 0.27, 0.03 ]
A systematic position holds two natures in one person; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: per the standard systematic categories, under reduced staffing. Reported by the automated check.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_5374db0036d0629a_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.17, 0.83 ]
A sermon assertion denies the bodily resurrection; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during an external partner integration. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_1198ab0a6baabdb3_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.89, 0.11 ]
A systematic position affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_d88746a014cc7cdb_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.94, 0.06, 0, 0 ]
A systematic position follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: under the Augsburg confession, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_e6cfea9dad04821c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.02, 0.1, 0.33, 0.47, 0.04 ]
A sermon assertion teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_bcf610ea7add61ec_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.07, 0.1, 0.19, 0.27, 0.28, 0.09 ]
A confessional statement follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_23058d98ffd61034_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.42, 0.25, 0.29, 0.04 ]
A systematic position affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: under the Augsburg confession, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_f96870f3eaf3eae9_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.62, 0.38 ]
A confessional statement affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: under the Augsburg confession, shortly after a software update. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_8848ae54eecf2131_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.17, 0.83 ]
A doctrinal claim uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_8be18ef088c6b6c1_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.1, 0.9 ]
A systematic position follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during peak load. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_f1a9df75be8bd599_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.91, 0.05, 0.03, 0.01 ]
A sermon assertion rejects the filioque clause; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during the morning shift. Reported by the review queue.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_dc0efe7be7d7c490_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.05, 0.08, 0.3, 0.4, 0.15, 0.02 ]
A systematic position rejects the filioque clause; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_a2eda0a4ea7061c6_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.01, 0.99, 0, 0 ]
A systematic position denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_bec385eb0008bf4d_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.51, 0.49 ]
A systematic position rejects the filioque clause; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during an external partner integration. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_ce69f1eddbda0dfd_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.06, 0.01, 0.04, 0.13, 0.58, 0.18 ]
A sermon assertion teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_0b152623dadaeced_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.75, 0.25 ]
A sermon assertion teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, under an active deadline. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_52ca80655bae50f9_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.94, 0.06 ]
A systematic position denies the bodily resurrection; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the system migration. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_1257077f5eeca54a_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.02, 0.03, 0.35, 0.15, 0.33, 0.12 ]
A systematic position follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during peak load. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_b049015c4624cf41_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.09, 0.91 ]
A sermon assertion denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, mid-incident. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_fbf734216db0905c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.03, 0.05, 0.46, 0.16, 0.25, 0.05 ]
A confessional statement denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: per the standard systematic categories, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_743a707deec9dcd9_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.01, 0.98, 0.01, 0 ]
A sermon assertion affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during normal operations. Reported by the supervisor.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_507975c6a1d7d6b8_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.01, 0.31, 0.13, 0.41, 0.13 ]
A systematic position follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the quarterly review. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_17e924017498aa8c_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.2, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.18, 0.52 ]
A systematic position denies the bodily resurrection; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, under reduced staffing. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_e460082217a1eaf1_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.14, 0.86 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: under the Augsburg confession, following a recent audit. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_9dcfeed65b8db2b0_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.07, 0.14, 0.42, 0.26, 0.09, 0.02 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, mid-incident. Reported by the operator.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_59e715ec5b7c2603_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.71, 0.29 ]
A systematic position holds two natures in one person; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during an external partner integration. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_ca49a87ac4d8a2b7_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.8, 0.2 ]
A doctrinal claim denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_48517d909f63b95f_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.03, 0.03, 0.24, 0.26, 0.39, 0.05 ]
A systematic position affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_85068fd686aee880_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.11, 0.05, 0.19, 0.14, 0.34, 0.17 ]
A systematic position denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the automated check.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_d1ec1a4c5ca08223_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.24, 0.17, 0.18, 0.2, 0.14, 0.07 ]
A confessional statement affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during the morning shift. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_719c1a68157e61f5_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.01, 0.98, 0.01, 0 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during an external partner integration. Reported by the automated check.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_31921e886048ce55_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.95, 0.05 ]
A sermon assertion follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_395312a8d0289d1b_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.95, 0, 0, 0.05 ]
A systematic position asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during peak load. Reported by the review queue.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_547630167f8f0a65_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.07, 0.02, 0.02, 0.05, 0.31, 0.53 ]
A confessional statement denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: under the Augsburg confession, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_1dc685cfa55b8bea_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.18, 0.04, 0.14, 0.15, 0.25, 0.24 ]
A sermon assertion teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during peak load. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_4c8849d2c1c5fbb9_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.24, 0.76 ]
A confessional statement affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, while on-call rotation changed. Reported by the review queue.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_fe2bf3708bf0ebf6_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.08, 0.16, 0.36, 0.28, 0.1, 0.02 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: per the standard systematic categories, following a recent audit. Reported by the automated check.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_c2bdf4b4ae53be8f_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.06, 0.07, 0.38, 0.29, 0.17, 0.03 ]
A sermon assertion holds two natures in one person; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the operator.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_7cfd7840212f0b63_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.3, 0.2, 0.13, 0.15, 0.1, 0.12 ]
A sermon assertion holds two natures in one person; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during an external partner integration. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_665d5837a9ba64a4_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.66, 0.34 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during peak load. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_dd89d55b2f8095f9_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.88, 0.09, 0.02, 0.01 ]
A confessional statement rejects the filioque clause; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the supervisor.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_43145f51adda3e2d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.03, 0.22, 0.3, 0.39, 0.05 ]
A sermon assertion holds two natures in one person; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_3279e268773e3c20_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.0303, 0.0101, 0.0606, 0.2525, 0.5657, 0.0808 ]
A doctrinal claim teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, following a recent audit. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_5f29bfa346149aa6_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.05, 0.1, 0.24, 0.47, 0.12, 0.02 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, following a recent audit. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_64eb9b25e32f4aa4_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.78, 0.22 ]
A sermon assertion holds two natures in one person; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the formulation is precise?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_138555b414edf04f_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.58, 0.42 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: under the Augsburg confession, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_6e56d3212f77fa2e_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0, 0.99, 0.01, 0 ]
A systematic position affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during an external partner integration. Reported by the monitoring system.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_0a1e0b5a71a08ec5_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.29, 0.71, 0, 0 ]
A sermon assertion denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during peak load. Reported by the monitoring system.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_0f49a70d9b844a96_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.35, 0.65 ]
A confessional statement holds two natures in one person; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_6ca0df8996929a20_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.14, 0.86 ]
A sermon assertion asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_667b3fd4a1d3872f_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.01, 0.81, 0.01, 0.17 ]
A systematic position rejects the filioque clause; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the operator.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_5ba37f7179b68d6d_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.61, 0.38, 0.01, 0 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: under the Augsburg confession, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the operator.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_a8f3798c4f5b7072_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.08, 0.41, 0.31, 0.14, 0.02 ]
A confessional statement rejects the filioque clause; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during an external partner integration. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_5666a0a076c8d8e8_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.96, 0.01, 0.01, 0.02 ]
A doctrinal claim rejects the filioque clause; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, mid-incident. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_694c0226f71136a4_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.67, 0.13, 0.18, 0.02 ]
A systematic position rejects the filioque clause; additionally affirms predestination with genuine offer. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during normal operations. Reported by the monitoring system.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_bcf610ea7add61ec_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.58, 0.23, 0.17, 0.02 ]
A confessional statement follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, under an active deadline. Reported by the supervisor.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_ba463f953c782ecb_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.37, 0.63 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: per the standard systematic categories, during the morning shift. Reported by the monitoring system.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_97696784f00bd2da_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.87, 0.12, 0, 0.01 ]
A doctrinal claim denies the bodily resurrection; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: under the Augsburg confession, following a recent audit. Reported by the supervisor.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_f11e1e57582633d4_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.07, 0, 0.04, 0.89 ]
A confessional statement rejects the filioque clause; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during an external partner integration. Reported by the supervisor.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_ac84f0f32d8759ff_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.02, 0.07, 0.29, 0.53, 0.05 ]
A confessional statement rejects the filioque clause; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, under an active deadline. Reported by the automated check.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_c064742135ba8a2b_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.06, 0.05, 0.16, 0.21, 0.45, 0.07 ]
A systematic position holds two natures in one person; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during peak load. Reported by the review queue.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_044c982ce38194ab_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.46, 0.54 ]
A doctrinal claim affirms predestination with genuine offer; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: per the standard systematic categories, as part of a compliance sweep. Reported by the supervisor.
Is this scenario one where: this contradicts the stated confession?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_bba6b39d6f8f8d9f_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.49, 0.35, 0.11, 0.05 ]
A systematic position holds two natures in one person; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the morning shift. Reported by the operator.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_5fc8059a6c4e37f3_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.5, 0.5 ]
A doctrinal claim holds two natures in one person; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, under reduced staffing. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_30543f502c2a2ee9_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.12, 0.21, 0.34, 0.23, 0.07, 0.03 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the monitoring system.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_a4a0702916423f7d_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.27, 0.27, 0.11, 0.25, 0.07, 0.03 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the quarterly review. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_d7a02bea12bad86f_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.17, 0.83 ]
A systematic position affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, with a new vendor onboarded. Reported by the automated check.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_06c5658519ab97e1_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.01, 0.01, 0.03, 0.2, 0.66, 0.09 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: per the standard systematic categories, under an active deadline. Reported by the review queue.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_1769dd8daff62d12_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.15, 0.03, 0.07, 0.11, 0.35, 0.29 ]
A doctrinal claim rejects the filioque clause; additionally denies the bodily resurrection. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, under an active deadline. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_b2c730b9e00dafe5_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.02, 0.04, 0.44, 0.2, 0.24, 0.06 ]
A sermon assertion denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, immediately after go-live. Reported by the operator.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_349acc2e9b5d9b8a_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0, 0.99, 0.01, 0 ]
A sermon assertion teaches salvation apart from the stated means; additionally uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language. Context: under the Augsburg confession, under an active deadline. Reported by the automated check.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_af0400850a3af75d_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.92, 0, 0, 0.08 ]
A confessional statement rejects the filioque clause; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: per the standard systematic categories, with staffing at reduced levels. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_59b165f7345208e3_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.04, 0.96, 0, 0 ]
A sermon assertion asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: under the Augsburg confession, following a recent audit. Reported by the automated check.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_8bae1ccd7f056d82_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.18, 0.09, 0.31, 0.19, 0.16, 0.07 ]
A sermon assertion affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: within the Chalcedonian framework, during the system migration. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_098f1e2a222aa962_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.25, 0.04, 0.03, 0.05, 0.11, 0.52 ]
A confessional statement denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally asserts that the divine nature underwent change. Context: under the Augsburg confession, shortly after a software update. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_7539212e2936277a_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.33, 0.67, 0, 0 ]
A doctrinal claim denies the bodily resurrection; additionally teaches salvation apart from the stated means. Context: under the Augsburg confession, during the quarterly review. Reported by the automated check.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_3d96fa534b357c80_c
choice
[ "christology", "soteriology", "ecclesiology", "theology_proper" ]
[ 0.6768, 0, 0.0505, 0.2727 ]
A confessional statement denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally rejects the filioque clause. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during the system migration. Reported by the supervisor.
Doctrine area for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_6452e3f45f2d7eef_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.19, 0.04, 0.27, 0.16, 0.24, 0.1 ]
A sermon assertion uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally denies the perpetual virginity explicitly. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the on-call engineer.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_9448e52a7afe51bf_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.04, 0.03, 0.43, 0.14, 0.29, 0.07 ]
A systematic position asserts that the divine nature underwent change; additionally holds two natures in one person. Context: per the standard systematic categories, mid-incident. Reported by the automated check.
Rate orthodoxy confidence for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_e2b94ad4d2ff6ab8_c
choice
[ "orthodox", "heterodox", "debated", "undefined" ]
[ 0.08, 0.79, 0.07, 0.06 ]
A confessional statement denies the perpetual virginity explicitly; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, during a scheduled maintenance window. Reported by the review queue.
Tradition alignment for this scenario.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_fa05ae945a718b4c_n
noul
[ "false", "true" ]
[ 0.3, 0.7 ]
A confessional statement uses analogy where the tradition uses identity language; additionally affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion. Context: under the Augsburg confession, while legacy systems are still active. Reported by the operator.
Is this scenario one where: the claim is consistent with the creedal tradition?
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
v3_23abd1fd040dd089_s
score
[ "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5" ]
[ 0.27, 0.47, 0.06, 0.11, 0.04, 0.05 ]
A sermon assertion affirms both full humanity and full divinity without confusion; additionally follows the ecumenical creeds verbatim. Context: in the ecumenical dialogues, at the end of the fiscal period. Reported by the review queue.
Rate doctrinal precision for this scenario on a 0-5 scale.
doctrinal_reasoning
theology
yuri_v3
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

JEV corpus - doctrinal_reasoning

7,466 typed calibrated decision rows from the jev-distill-corpus-v3 corpus (domain: doctrinal_reasoning).

Each row is one typed decision: kind (noul / choice / score), a state, a question, options, and a target probability distribution over the options.

Part of the per-domain split of SargeDev/jev-distill-corpus-v3 - the full corpus in one repo.

Domains:

Downloads last month
37