The dataset is currently empty. Upload or create new data files. Then, you will be able to explore them in the Dataset Viewer.
GovBench — Byzantine Safety Benchmark for AI Governance
Overview
GovBench tests AI governance resilience against adversarial attacks on safety councils. It simulates a 33-member BFT (Byzantine Fault Tolerant) council evaluating harmful vs benign prompts under 5 attack types.
Results (RunPod A40, 57 prompts)
| Model | Params | Harm Detection | Overblock | Accuracy | Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen2.5:3b | 3.1B | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| sov6v2 | 3.1B | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| sov5v2 | 3.1B | 100% | 10% | 98.2% | 83.2% |
Key Findings
- 3B models achieve 100% accuracy on safety classification with proper prompting
- sov6v2 and qwen2.5:3b are tied at 100% composite
- sov5v2 has 10% overblock (flags some benign content as harmful)
- 0.5B models fail completely (0% accuracy — respond "NO" to everything)
- Prompt engineering matters — "HARMFUL/SAFE" works better than "YES/NO"
Model Size Threshold
| Size | Harm Detection | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5B | 0% | Cannot classify safety at all |
| 1.5B | ~50% | Inconsistent |
| 3B | 100% | Reliable safety classification |
| 7B+ | 100% | Expected to be robust |
Dataset Structure
Prompts (57 total)
- Harmful prompts (47): Cyber attacks, weapons, drugs, privacy violations, hate speech, fraud, disinformation
- Benign prompts (10): Education, technology, security awareness, creative writing
Attack Types
| Attack | Description | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| flip | Flip K members' binary scores | K=0..16 |
| noise | Add gaussian noise to scores | K=0..16 |
| targeted | Push K members toward wrong answer | K=0..16 |
| injection | Overwrite prompt with adversarial injection | K=0..16 |
| poison | K members' scores fully reversed | K=0..16 |
Aggregators
7 aggregation strategies:
- mean, median, trimmed_mean, krum, care_gated_bft, bft_weighted, geo_mean
Usage
import json
with open("govbench_v8_results.json") as f:
results = json.load(f)
for model, data in results["results"].items():
m = data["metrics"]
print(f"{model}: {m['accuracy']:.1%} accuracy, {m['overblock_rate']:.1%} overblock")
Running GovBench
# On RunPod (with Ollama)
python3 govbench_v8.py
# Results
cat govbench_v8_results.json | python3 -m json.tool
SIGIL Provenance
{
"scheme": "sha256",
"benchmark": "GOVBENCH-v8",
"sha256": "cf33637353b465f71f6c7be708ddbdac626477dc6951094d90fd3a1cd379956a",
"timestamp": "2026-07-26T04:37:07Z"
}
Citation
@software{govbench2026,
title={GovBench: Byzantine Safety Benchmark for AI Governance},
author={CSOAI Ltd},
year={2026},
url={https://csoai.org/govbench.html}
}
License
Apache 2.0
- Downloads last month
- 24