question stringclasses 2
values | reasoning stringclasses 2
values | damage_rules stringclasses 2
values | final_answer stringclasses 2
values | damage_category stringclasses 2
values | building_observations stringclasses 2
values | classification_status stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Can the building be assigned a damage category from the available observations? | The roof is largely obscured, so its condition cannot be assessed. The dark facade streak is not confirmed to be a superficial mark or a crack, and neither roof collapse nor wall displacement is visible. The evidence therefore does not establish either category under the rules. | Classify as major damage if a roof plane is visibly collapsed or an exterior wall is visibly displaced. Classify as minor damage if the only confirmed condition is a superficial facade mark. If the relevant roof or wall condition cannot be assessed, and the visible evidence does not establish either category, report in... | The damage category cannot be determined from the available evidence. | Cannot be determined from the available evidence | The roof surface is largely obscured by tree canopy in the survey imagery. A dark streak is visible on the western facade, but the imagery does not show whether it is a surface mark or a crack. No roof collapse or wall displacement can be confirmed from the visible portions. | insufficient_evidence |
Which damage category applies under the stated rules? | The observations state that part of the roof covering is missing and roof members are exposed, while the exterior walls remain upright. This matches the rule for moderate damage and does not meet the stated severe-damage criteria. | Classify as severe damage if any exterior wall has collapsed or the roof has fully collapsed. Classify as moderate damage if part of the roof covering is missing and roof members are exposed while the exterior walls remain upright. Classify as minor damage for isolated surface marks without roof-covering loss or wall d... | Moderate damage. | moderate damage | The aerial survey shows a section of roof covering missing along the eastern slope, with several roof members exposed. The visible exterior walls remain upright, and no wall displacement or collapse is recorded. | determined |
UAS Disaster Mapping Building Damage Rule-Based Reasoning QA Dataset
This dataset pairs textual descriptions of building conditions documented in unmanned aerial surveys with explicit damage assessment rules to create questions about damage classification and evidence sufficiency. It covers cases where the evidence supports a rule-based category as well as cases where the available information is insufficient for a determination, helping models connect observations to professional criteria. It is suited to post-disaster building assessment, emergency mapping analysis, and training or evaluation of rule-grounded reasoning models.
Technical Specifications
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| question | string | Question asking for a damage classification or whether the available evidence is sufficient to determine one. |
| reasoning | string | Explanation linking the observed evidence to the applicable rule, including why evidence is insufficient when no category can be determined. |
| damage_rules | string | Explicit criteria for mapping observed building conditions to damage categories. |
| final_answer | string | Concise answer to the question, stating the inferred damage category or that it cannot be determined from the available evidence. |
| damage_category | string | Damage category inferred by applying the stated rules, or an explicit indication that the category cannot be determined. |
| building_observations | string | Textual description of visible building conditions documented by unmanned aerial survey. |
| classification_status | string | Indicates whether the provided evidence and rules support a damage classification. |
Compliance Statement
| Authorization Type | CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike) |
| Commercial Use | Requires exclusive subscription or authorization contract (monthly or per-invocation charging) |
| Privacy and Anonymization | No PII, no real company names, simulated scenarios follow industry standards |
| Compliance System | Compliant with China's Data Security Law / EU GDPR / supports enterprise data access logs |
Source & Contact
- Downloads last month
- 4