parties list | legal_basis list | case_profile dict | case_summary string | court_reasoning string | disputed_issues list | handling_result dict | evidence_references list | source_document_text string | rescue_responsibilities list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"party_name": "Lin Wei",
"party_role": "Injured cyclist",
"litigation_status": "Plaintiff",
"main_position": "Seeks compensation for collision-related injuries and asserts that the delay in calling emergency services aggravated the injuries."
},
{
"party_name": "Qiao Ren",
"party_role"... | [
{
"basis_name": "Road Traffic Safety Law",
"provision_or_rule": "Article 70, as cited in the judgment, requires a driver involved in a traffic accident to rescue injured persons promptly and report the accident.",
"application_to_case": "The court uses this rule to assess Qiao's failure to call emergenc... | {
"case_type": "Civil motor-vehicle traffic accident liability and personal-injury compensation dispute",
"court_name": "Pinebridge District People's Court",
"case_number": "Not stated in the document",
"document_date": "November 16, 2023"
} | After a van struck a cyclist, the driver failed to call emergency services promptly, and a passerby called an ambulance about fourteen minutes later. The court found a breach of the cited prompt-rescue duty but found no medical evidence that the delay caused additional harm. It allocated proven collision losses 80 perc... | The traffic incident report and the parties' undisputed allocation establish Qiao's 80 percent responsibility for the collision and Lin's 20 percent responsibility. Qiao failed to make a prompt emergency call, contrary to the rescue duty cited in the judgment. However, the medical records and review do not show that th... | [
{
"issue_description": "Whether Qiao's failure to call emergency services promptly caused additional injury or compensable loss beyond the collision-related damages.",
"claimant_position": "Lin says the delay of about fourteen minutes aggravated his injuries and seeks compensation for that additional harm."... | {
"result_type": "Civil judgment",
"liability_allocation": "Qiao bears 80 percent and Lin bears 20 percent of responsibility for the collision, as stated in the undisputed allocation. No separate liability is imposed for unproven additional harm from delayed rescue.",
"cost_or_compensation_result": "The insurer m... | [
{
"evidence_excerpt": "The traffic incident report found Qiao primarily responsible and Lin secondarily responsible. The parties did not dispute the report's allocation of 80 percent responsibility to Qiao and 20 percent to Lin.",
"document_location": "Facts and findings section",
"supports_conclusion":... | PINEBRIDGE DISTRICT PEOPLE'S COURT
Civil Judgment
The case number is not stated in the copy of the judgment.
Date: November 16, 2023
Plaintiff Lin Wei seeks compensation from driver Qiao Ren and Morrow Mutual Property Insurance Company following a road collision. At about 6:40 p.m. on June 8, 2023, Qiao's van struck L... | [
{
"responsible_subject": "Qiao Ren",
"duty_content": "Make an immediate emergency call and take prompt steps to obtain assistance for the injured person after the collision.",
"duty_basis": "Article 70 of the Road Traffic Safety Law, as cited in the judgment, requires prompt rescue of injured persons an... |
[
{
"party_name": "Ilan Voss",
"party_role": "Injured motorcyclist and recipient of emergency assistance",
"litigation_status": "Plaintiff",
"main_position": "Claims that the passerby's movement aggravated his spinal injury and seeks 60,000 yuan for additional treatment and related loss."
},
{
... | [
{
"basis_name": "Civil Code",
"provision_or_rule": "Article 184, as quoted in the judgment, provides that a person who causes harm to a recipient while voluntarily performing emergency rescue is not civilly liable.",
"application_to_case": "The court finds that Sen moved Voss to remove him from an immed... | {
"case_type": "Civil tort-liability dispute concerning injury during emergency rescue",
"court_name": "Stonefield District People's Court",
"case_number": "Not stated in the document",
"document_date": "July 19, 2024"
} | After a road collision, a passerby and witnesses moved an injured motorcyclist away from a van when smoke and a small flame were visible. The injured person alleged that the movement worsened a spinal injury, but the medical report could not establish additional harm. Applying Article 184 of the Civil Code as quoted in... | The evidence shows smoke and a visible flame near Voss after the collision, and the dispatcher recording contemplated moving him if there was an immediate fire danger. Sen acted with two witnesses to move him to a clear area. The court treats this as voluntary emergency rescue under Article 184 as quoted in the judgmen... | [
{
"issue_description": "Whether Sen's movement of Voss during the emergency rescue caused an additional spinal injury or compensable aggravation.",
"claimant_position": "Voss says the movement aggravated his spinal injury and seeks 60,000 yuan for additional treatment and related loss.",
"opposing_posit... | {
"result_type": "Civil judgment",
"liability_allocation": "Sen is not held civilly liable for the claimed harm during the voluntary emergency rescue. The van driver is not a party, and this judgment makes no determination of that driver's liability.",
"cost_or_compensation_result": "No damages are awarded agains... | [
{
"evidence_excerpt": "Witnesses saw smoke and a small flame under the van near the roadway.",
"document_location": "Facts and findings section",
"supports_conclusion": "Supports the finding that an immediate fire danger was present when the rescue occurred."
},
{
"evidence_excerpt": "The emerge... | STONEFIELD DISTRICT PEOPLE'S COURT
Civil Judgment
The case number is not stated in the copy of the judgment.
Date: July 19, 2024
Plaintiff Ilan Voss seeks damages from defendant Mara Sen, a passerby who assisted him after a road collision. At about 9:15 p.m. on January 27, 2024, Voss was injured when his motorcycle co... | [
{
"responsible_subject": "Mara Sen",
"duty_content": "Provide assistance in response to the immediate danger while acting as a voluntary rescuer.",
"duty_basis": "Article 184 of the Civil Code, as quoted in the judgment, addresses civil liability for harm caused to a recipient during voluntary emergency... |
[
{
"party_name": "Clearway Road Recovery Ltd.",
"party_role": "Roadside recovery and towing service provider",
"litigation_status": "Plaintiff",
"main_position": "Seeks the unpaid 700-yuan balance for dispatch, towing, winching, and storage following the accident."
},
{
"party_name": "Tao Jun... | [
{
"basis_name": "Signed roadside assistance work order and incorporated fee table",
"provision_or_rule": "The order authorizes recovery and towing, lists dispatch and towing at 1,800 yuan and winch recovery at 400 yuan, and conditions storage charges after the first twenty-four hours on notice that the vehi... | {
"case_type": "Civil roadside recovery service contract dispute",
"court_name": "Greenmere County People's Court",
"case_number": "Not stated in the document",
"document_date": "March 8, 2024"
} | A recovery provider sued for the unpaid balance of roadside recovery services after a car left the road. The court found the dispatch, towing, and winching authorized and supported by the signed work order and fee table. It allowed the unpaid 400-yuan winch charge but rejected 300 yuan in storage fees because the provi... | The signed order authorized recovery and towing, and the recovery log confirms that winching was necessary because the car was in a drainage channel. The fee table lists the 400-yuan winch charge, which remains unpaid after Tao's 1,800-yuan payment. The same order makes post-initial-period storage contingent on notice ... | [
{
"issue_description": "Whether the fee for winch recovery was authorized and supported by the work order and service records.",
"claimant_position": "Clearway says the winch was necessary and that the fee is listed in the incorporated fee table.",
"opposing_position": "Tao disputes the additional charg... | {
"result_type": "Civil judgment",
"liability_allocation": "Tao is liable for the unpaid 400-yuan winch charge under the work order. Clearway is not entitled to the disputed 300-yuan storage charge because the required notice was not established.",
"cost_or_compensation_result": "Tao must pay Clearway 400 yuan. T... | [
{
"evidence_excerpt": "Tao signed a roadside assistance work order authorizing recovery and towing to a repair yard. The signed order incorporates a fee table and records an initial payment of 1,800 yuan.",
"document_location": "Facts and findings section",
"supports_conclusion": "Supports the contractu... | GREENMERE COUNTY PEOPLE'S COURT
Civil Judgment
The case number is not stated in the copy of the judgment.
Date: March 8, 2024
Plaintiff Clearway Road Recovery Ltd. seeks payment from Tao Jun for roadside recovery services performed after a traffic accident. At about 10:20 p.m. on October 2, 2023, Tao's car left the pa... | [
{
"responsible_subject": "Clearway Road Recovery Ltd.",
"duty_content": "Carry out the authorized roadside recovery and towing, and notify the vehicle owner that the vehicle is ready for collection before charging storage after the initial twenty-four hours.",
"duty_basis": "The signed roadside assistan... |
Road Traffic Accident Rescue Legal Case Document Understanding Dataset
This dataset focuses on judgments and related legal handling documents concerning road traffic accident rescue. It pairs source documents with structured information on case profiles, parties, disputed issues, rescue responsibilities, legal grounds, reasoning, and outcomes. Evidence excerpts support verification of key conclusions, making the data suitable for legal document understanding and domain-specific supervised fine-tuning. It can support training and evaluation for legal information extraction, case summarization, and rescue responsibility analysis.
Technical Specifications
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| parties | array | Parties involved in the accident, rescue, or legal proceedings, together with their procedural or handling roles. |
| legal_basis | array | Legal rules cited or substantively applied in the document and their relationship to the disputed issues. |
| case_profile | object | Case type, court, case number, judgment date, and other information identified from the source document. |
| case_summary | string | A consolidated summary of the case background, rescue-related disputes, responsibility analysis, and final outcome. |
| court_reasoning | string | Main reasoning used by the court or handling body to establish facts, allocate rescue responsibilities, and address disputed issues. |
| disputed_issues | array | Road traffic accident rescue disputes explicitly discussed in the document and the positions of the parties. |
| handling_result | object | The judgment ruling or legal handling decision, including liability findings, cost allocation, and procedural outcome. |
| evidence_references | array | Document excerpts and locations supporting key facts, responsibility findings, or handling conclusions, enabling verification of the structured analysis. |
| source_document_text | string | Full text of a judgment or legal handling document related to road traffic accident rescue. |
| rescue_responsibilities | array | Rescue-related duties after the accident, such as providing assistance, giving notice, cooperating, or advancing costs, and whether those duties were fulfilled. |
Compliance Statement
| Authorization Type | CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike) |
| Commercial Use | Requires exclusive subscription or authorization contract (monthly or per-invocation charging) |
| Privacy and Anonymization | No PII, no real company names, simulated scenarios follow industry standards |
| Compliance System | Compliant with China's Data Security Law / EU GDPR / supports enterprise data access logs |
Source & Contact
- Downloads last month
- -