Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
string
kind
string
title
string
measured
list
result
string
status
string
page
string
log_leaf
int64
doi
string
scripts
unknown
date
timestamp[s]
claim
string
check
string
SM-016
paper
Toxic-release reports are due 1 July, with a statutory fine of up to $71,545 for each day late. A thousand plants filed more than a year late for 2019, and 61 of them appear in any EPCRA 313 case opened since
[ "2026-10-03T00:00:00" ]
473,709 TRI forms for 2019–2024: 16,522 postmarked after 1 July, 5,964 more than a year late. For 2019, 61 of 1,003 facilities more than a year late appear in any EPCRA 313 case opened since; EPA's formal 313 actions 52, 51, 41, then 16 (FY2025) and 14 (FY2026). 22 federal facilities late for 2023, exempt by statute. L...
Published 2026-10-04; questions for EPA prepared, not yet sent
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-016.html
9,276
10.5281/zenodo.23130553
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-016"
null
null
null
SM-015
paper
Certificate Transparency’s new tiled logs publish in seconds. The old ones take up to an hour, and the browsers’ own log lists are the slowest part
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00", "2026-10-03T00:00:00" ]
All 64 logs measured (61 of Chrome's 64, plus Cloudflare's three Raio shards from Apple's list) inside their MMD: 43 tiled logs within 5.7 s (median 0.2 s); 21 RFC 6962 logs 10 s to 61 min (Cloudflare Nimbus 46 and 61 min). Chrome policy caps RFC 6962 MMD at 4 h while log_list.json declares 86,400 s for all 21; four Tr...
Sent to Apple and Chrome 2026-10-03, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-015.html
9,259
10.5281/zenodo.23123269
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-015"
null
null
null
SM-012
paper
Certificate authorities get 92 days to file their audits. Most file in the last week, one in eleven files late, and Windows still trusts a root whose last audit ended in 2019
[ "2026-10-03T00:00:00" ]
108 of 119 current CA audit statements dated inside the CCADB's 92-day window (34 in the last ten days, 10 on the last three), 11 past it, 7 with nothing on file. Roots with newest audit over 15 months old: Mozilla 0 of 172, Chrome 0 of 101, Apple 6 of 144, Microsoft 24 of 331, oldest Certinomis (December 2019).
Sent to CCADB and Microsoft 2026-10-03, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-012.html
9,258
10.5281/zenodo.23123265
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-012"
null
null
null
SM-011
paper
Firefox’s revocation list is months behind the biggest certificate logs. One in eleven top sites, mozilla.org included, gets no revocation check at all
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00" ]
Reader 112 days behind Xenon2026h2, 1.66 billion entries unread. 68 of 726 top-1,000 certificates not covered; 346 of 3,792 in the top 5,000. 57 of the 68 (299 of 346 in the top 5,000) were issued by Google Trust Services, 37.7% of its top-1,000 certificates.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-011.html
9,253
10.5281/zenodo.23123261
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-011"
null
null
null
SM-010
paper
Hugging Face says every file goes through its malware scanner. Nothing over 2 GB does, and the badge says safe anyway
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00" ]
2,539 of 2,551 files under 2 GiB scanned; 0 of 487 at 2 GiB or more. 476 of those show “safe”.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-010.html
9,257
10.5281/zenodo.23123005
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-010"
null
null
null
SM-009
paper
Firefox promised a list of every revoked certificate. A third of the ones revoked on day one aren’t on it, and it no longer asks anyone else
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00" ]
427 of 465 current revocations on the list. Revoked within 24 hours of issuance: 37 of 108 missing, for up to 28 days.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-009.html
9,256
10.5281/zenodo.23123001
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-009"
null
null
null
SM-008
paper
A federal directive says CISA rates every CVE. Since March, it has rated almost no Linux kernel bugs
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00" ]
1,731 of 1,731 exploited CVEs rated. 1 of 158 sampled kernel CVEs since March.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-008.html
9,255
10.5281/zenodo.23122997
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-008"
null
null
null
SM-007
paper
Docker promised signed attestations for every Official Image. The attestations arrived; the signatures didn't
[ "2026-10-02T00:00:00" ]
7,368 of 7,372 Linux images carry attestations. 0 of 45 sampled are signed.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-007.html
9,254
10.5281/zenodo.23122993
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-007"
null
null
null
SM-006
paper
x402 payments on Base fell by three-quarters in two months, and the same two operators still send most of them
[ "2026-08-05T00:00:00", "2026-10-01T00:00:00" ]
234,490 payments a day in August, 63,003 on 1 October. Two wallet groups sent about 80% on both days.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-006.html
9,240
10.5281/zenodo.23122988
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-006"
null
null
null
SM-005
paper
Meta's whitepaper says its private-AI log refreshes every 3 hours. Since January it's been every 6
[ "2026-09-30T00:00:00" ]
Lists every 6 hours, not 3. New software entries in 37 of 70 weeks.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-005.html
9,239
10.5281/zenodo.23122986
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-005"
null
null
null
SM-004
paper
We tried to catch whisper.online's ledger out. It passed every test, and we found it sending us ten copies of everything
[ "2026-09-12T00:00:00", "2026-09-30T00:00:00" ]
Every check passed. A fix took duplicate updates from about ten per change to one.
Confirmed by operator
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-004.html
9,238
10.5281/zenodo.23071390
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-004"
null
null
null
SM-003
paper
Wild SBOMs was billed as the work of many developers. Nearly half came from one robot
[ "2026-09-30T00:00:00" ]
Nearly half came from one automated run in 2022.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-003.html
9,237
10.5281/zenodo.23123301
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-003"
null
null
null
SM-002
paper
The dataset behind 39 studies of Claude Code can see 1 in 11 of its pull requests
[ "2026-09-30T00:00:00" ]
Its search catches about 1 in 11, and an unusual slice of them.
Sent, response pending
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-002.html
9,236
10.5281/zenodo.23123115
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-002"
null
null
null
SM-001
paper
Google's Pixel ledger promised every release. January went missing, and stayed missing for eight months
[ "2026-09-15T00:00:00", "2026-09-30T00:00:00" ]
The January 2026 release was missing. Google added it.
Confirmed, fixed
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/sm-001.html
9,235
10.5281/zenodo.23070510
"https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/tree/main/sm-001"
null
null
null
NULL-001
claim held
null
null
27 of 28 match the v-prefixed release tag. The recovery image's commit is on usbarmory/armory-ums master, but no 0.1.0 tag exists there or in any fork.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/armored-witness-firmware.py" ]
2026-09-30T00:00:00
Every entry in the Armored Witness production firmware log names the source it was built from
Each of the 28 entries' commit_fingerprint compared with the commit its tag points to on GitHub (script)
NULL-002
claim held
null
null
150 of 150 retrievable and consistent.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/plexi_coverage.py" ]
2026-09-30T00:00:00
Cloudflare's Plexi auditor has verified every WhatsApp key-transparency (v2) epoch from 722,677 to its reported last verified epoch
150 epochs drawn uniformly from 722,677 to 1,297,263, each audit fetched and its epoch, namespace and digest checked (script). Audit signatures not checked here.
NULL-003
claim held
null
null
Every repository has at least 50 stars, a cut the paper doesn't state; that is 4.3% of matching repositories. Python and TypeScript lead on both sides of it, and no owner holds more than 1%.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/mcp_star_floor.py" ]
2026-10-01T00:00:00
A Large-Scale Dataset of MCP Implementations on GitHub (MSR '26) describes real-world MCP development
Their released data and code, and GitHub's counts of matching repositories above and below the code's 50-star minimum (script)
NULL-004
claim held
null
null
17.9% of uploads carry an attestation (95%: 15.1–20.8%). Of the files still on PyPI, 20.5%, which is also a floor on Trusted Publishing. 178 of 179 come from GitHub.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/pypi_attest.py" ]
2026-10-01T00:00:00
PyPI: “17% of all uploads to PyPI in the last year included an attestation”, and more than 20% came via Trusted Publishing (2025 in review)
1,000 file uploads drawn from PyPI’s own changelog across 2025 (50 random three-day stretches, 20 files each), each looked up in PyPI’s Integrity API (script)
NULL-005
claim held
null
null
418 of 10,402 (4.02%) to the end of August. Of the 135 whose name is tied to a verified domain, 116 stayed with that domain’s owner. 283 of the 418 are named after a GitHub account, where the registry checks no domain at all.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/mcp_endpoint_redirects.py" ]
2026-10-01T00:00:00
Same Name, Different Server (arXiv 2609.14119): 4.2% of multi-version servers in the official MCP registry moved their endpoint to a different host while keeping their name, which the registry “cannot distinguish” from a takeover
Every version in the registry from its public API, comparing each server’s endpoint hosts between consecutive versions (script)
NULL-006
claim held
null
null
0 of 150 CVE records and 0 of 150 OSV files carry credits; all 150 CVE records carry metrics and problemTypes.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/github_cve_credits.py" ]
2026-10-01T00:00:00
Never Emitted (arXiv 2609.33099): GitHub shows who reported each vulnerability on its advisory but leaves that credit out of the CVE record and its OSV file
The newest 150 GitHub-assigned CVEs whose advisory credits someone, each CVE record read from CVE Services and each OSV file from GitHub’s advisory database (script)
NULL-007
claim held
null
null
599 of 600 attested; every CI attestation carries a Sigstore transparency-log entry. The exception: ht 2.1.0’s two Monterey bottles, built 24 April 2024 and still served, which neither signer attests. Reported as homebrew-core#314985.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/homebrew_bottle_attestations.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
Homebrew: homebrew-core uses Sigstore “to cryptographically attest to all bottles built in the official Homebrew CI” (2024)
600 bottle files drawn at random from formulae.brew.sh in two independent samples, each looked up in GitHub’s attestation API under homebrew-core’s CI and Homebrew’s backfill signer (script)
NULL-008
claim held
null
null
163 of 163 within one business day. 68 had been analysed before they reached the catalogue; the other 95 took a median of 19.5 hours.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/nvd_kev_enrichment.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
NIST NVD: for CVEs in CISA’s known-exploited catalogue, “our goal is to enrich these within one business day of receipt” (from 15 April 2026)
Every one of the 163 catalogue entries added since 15 April, timed from the later of catalogue addition and NVD publication to NIST’s first analysis in NVD’s own change history (script)
NULL-009
claim held
null
null
408 of 408 carry both; 12 of 12 signatures verify, all from the release identity Kubernetes documents. Certificate chain and transparency-log entries not checked here.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/kubernetes_signatures.py", "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/kubernetes_signatures_verify.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
Kubernetes: “The Kubernetes release process signs all binary artifacts (tarballs, SPDX files, standalone binaries) by using cosign’s keyless signing.”
Every standalone binary in the latest patch of each minor version from 1.26 to 1.37 (408 files) checked for its .sig and .cert, and one kubectl signature per version verified with our own code (presence, verification)
NULL-010
claim held
null
null
515 epochs, 4 July to 2 October: median interval 4.00 hours; longest 38.1 hours (27–28 September), inside the 72-hour limit. Two epoch numbers at the start of the window aren’t visible, probably expired from the search index.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/proton_kt_epochs.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
Proton Mail key transparency: “Normally a ProtonKT epoch should be published every 4 hours. The maximum publishing interval is 72 hours” (whitepaper, p. 14)
Every epoch certificate Proton logged to Certificate Transparency since July, found through Cert Spotter; each certificate’s name encodes its epoch number and issue time (script)
NULL-011
claim held
null
null
64 of 64 inside the promise. Tiled: all 43 within 6 seconds, most within 1. Classic: DigiCert 10 seconds, Google and Sectigo 1 to 2 minutes, TrustAsia 2.5 minutes, Cloudflare’s Nimbus 46 and 61 minutes, the only logs that publish a new tree head less often than every minute. The 24-hour figure Firefox’s revocation filt...
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/ct_merge_delays.py", "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/ct_merge_delays_tiles.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
Every Certificate Transparency log promises a maximum merge delay: 24 hours for the classic logs, 60 seconds for the tiled ones (the mmd field of the Google and Apple log lists; RFC 6962 §3)
A fresh certificate submitted to each of the 64 usable or qualified logs that will take a current certificate (our own chain, SM-009’s certificates with their CCADB intermediates, and entries harvested from 2027h2 and 2028 tiled logs), each log then polled on its own thread until it served the entry: an inclusion proof...
NULL-015
claim held
null
null
24 reports carry a Next-update date, none past it without a CA update; no root-program or community question has waited over 7 days for a CA reply. One open report is Microsoft PKI Services filing an incident for missing its own seven-day update on another.
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/ccadb_incident_cadence.py" ]
2026-10-03T00:00:00
CCADB incident-report rules: open reports “MUST be updated: on or before the ‘Next update’ date in the Whiteboard field”; CA Owners “MUST respond within 7 days” to comments and questions
Every open [ca-compliance] bug in Bugzilla's CA Program (92): Next-update date, assignee, every comment with author and time; run twice the same day
NULL-014
claim held
null
null
15,982 subscriber CRLs: median 3 hours old, 99% under a day; median validity 7.0 days, 90th percentile 9.96 against a 10-day cap. No TLS CRL stale or expired. Five over seven days old are non-TLS CAs carrying a server-authentication bit; one real: Brazil’s ITI (Microsoft-trusted only) serves an EV CRL with nextUpdate 2...
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/crl_freshness.py" ]
2026-10-03T00:00:00
CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements 4.9.7: a CA issuing subscriber certificates “MUST update and publish a new CRL at least every seven (7) days”; CRL profile: nextUpdate “at most 10 days after the thisUpdate” for CRLs covering subscriber certificates
Every CRL URL the CCADB lists for its 2,206 not-revoked TLS-capable intermediates (16,141 distinct URLs, 62 CA owners), fetched and parsed; 1,500 re-fetched an hour later
NULL-013
claim held
null
null
Every Actions-generated attestation is in the log: 161 of 161 found on Rekor at the stated index. The other 227 bundles are GitHub’s own release attestations, which come with immutable releases: signed by GitHub’s certificate authority with a one-year certificate, timestamped by GitHub, and in no public log. GitHub’s r...
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/github_attestations/collect.py", "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/github_attestations/verify_rekor.py" ]
2026-10-03T00:00:00
GitHub: “Public repositories that generate artifact attestations use the Sigstore Public Good Instance. A copy of the generated Sigstore bundle is stored with GitHub and is also written to an immutable transparency log that is publicly readable on the internet.”
The latest release of each of the 1,000 most-starred repositories pushed since September; every attestation GitHub holds for their assets (388 bundles from 63 repositories), each bundle’s transparency-log entry looked up on the public Rekor instance by index
NULL-012
claim held
null
null
457 are unreproducible. 128 were there before the gate; 231 replaced a version that was already unreproducible, which the rule allows; 76 carry a public release-team hint; 10 got their verdict after crossing. The last 12, all petsc, are the gate working: britney flagged them in June, the release manager judged them ren...
null
https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/#nulls
null
null
[ "https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements/blob/main/nulls/debian_reproducible_gate.py" ]
2026-10-02T00:00:00
Debian release team: “Since yesterday, we have enabled our migration software to block migration of new packages that can’t be reproduced or existing packages (in testing) that regress in reproducibility” (debian-devel-announce, 10 May 2026)
Every binary in testing with a rebuild verdict on reproduce.debian.net (36,003), split by what changed since the gate, scored with britney’s own per-binary regression rule, and the remainder crossed with the release team’s public hints and each package’s migration date (script)

Second Measurements

Public claims about logs, datasets and software supply chains, recomputed by a different path than the one that produced them. One row per check: what was claimed, how we re-measured it, what we found, and what the other party said.

Papers and evidence: https://markovianprotocol.com/measurements/ · Scripts: https://github.com/MarkovianProtocol/second-measurements

What is in it

measurements.jsonl has one row per check.

field meaning
id SM-NNN for a published paper, NULL-NNN for a check where the claim held
kind paper or claim held
title / claim the headline (papers) or the claim as the organisation stated it (nulls)
check what was recomputed, from which public data (nulls)
result the number we got
status where the finding stands with the other party (papers)
measured / date when the check ran
page the paper or the row on the site
log_leaf the leaf in the Markovian transparency log that holds the page's sha256
doi Zenodo DOI where one exists
scripts the code that produced the result

files/ mirrors the GitHub repository at upload time: per-paper scripts, the saved source pages each exhibit was read from, SHA256SUMS and retrieved_at for every exhibit, the log receipt for each page, the AIDev paper map, and the scheduled rechecks.

How a row is pinned

Each paper's sha256 sits in a transparency log cosigned by independent witnesses (https://log.markovianprotocol.com) and anchored to Bitcoin with OpenTimestamps. The receipt files in files/ carry the leaf index and inclusion-proof URL.

How we work

The claim is quoted verbatim from the organisation's own page. The condition that would kill the finding is stated before measuring. Only public endpoints are used, with code written from the specification rather than the operator's tooling. Each check is rerun on a different day before publication. The organisation gets the evidence and specific questions before or at publication, and its reply is printed on the page. Claims that held are listed too.

Paper text is CC BY 4.0. Code in files/ is MIT.

Downloads last month
1,747