id stringlengths 16 19 | source_scenario stringlengths 12 12 | conflict_risk stringclasses 3
values | dialog_type stringclasses 4
values | num_characters int64 2 5 | characters stringlengths 9 43 | description stringlengths 266 488 | character_roles stringlengths 41 113 | expression_styles stringlengths 42 148 | conflict_characteristics stringlengths 41 123 | role_profiles stringlengths 269 746 | emotions stringlengths 34 99 | emotion_descriptions stringlengths 174 488 | expression_tasks stringlengths 292 921 | characteristic_tasks stringlengths 280 909 | interaction_regulation_tasks stringlengths 391 1.47k | interaction_outcome_tasks stringlengths 450 1.69k | bdi_risk stringlengths 938 2.83k | group_image_labeled stringlengths 37 37 | individual_images stringlengths 117 299 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
agentviss_low_01 | scenario_001 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Daniel | At a quiet restaurant table, Elena treats Daniel's breakup story as relevant guidance and asks directly how he handled a similar situation. Daniel's reply becomes the center of the exchange, with both of them keeping the discussion cooperative by recasting it through joking examples of petty revenge after relationships... | {"Daniel": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Deception", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Daniel": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writ... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel should use deception by presenting a selectively sanitized account as if it were a full answer and redirect sensitive specifics into joking generalizations about petty post-breakup behavior.", "Elena": "Elena should ask Daniel for concrete handling details while strategically withholding her own comp... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should maintain a collaborating stance by offering advice-shaped responses that appear responsive to Elena's question while steering the discussion toward broadly shared examples instead of fully exposing his own experience.", "Elena": "Elena should maintain a collaborating stance by framing Daniel's... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should track Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, reframing, eye focus, and posture shifts, then adjust detail level, joking intensity, and redirection speed to preserve credibility without appearing evasive.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Daniel's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interru... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena establish Daniel's reply as the accepted center of the conversation when Daniel delivers a selectively sanitized but advice-shaped account, Elena responds as if the answer is useful and sufficient, and both support that result by shifting into joking generalizations about petty post-breakup... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Elena is treating his story as a source of advice and expects an account of how he got through a similar breakup.", "desire": "To provide an answer that satisfies Elena's request without fully exposing the more sensitive parts of his experience.", "intention": "To answer in a way that keeps the c... | images/scenario_001/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_02 | scenario_002 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Lila | In the shared apartment that morning, Elena and Lila use their conversation over drinks to settle a workable understanding of the day. Lila clearly frames that she will go to her coffee shop shift, while Elena presents that she will spend the day looking for paid work, allowing both of them to leave with an agreed sens... | {"Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Avoiding"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "job seeker"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "coffee shop employee"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must describe the day as a concrete job-search plan with credible detail while avoiding statements that could reveal any mismatch with actual follow-through so Lila retains a view of responsible next steps.", "Lila": "Lila must state her coffee shop shift and the expectation that Elena will use the day... | {"Elena": "Elena must strategically frame the morning talk as a shared coordination problem by aligning her stated plan with Lila's shift and reinforcing a workable division of responsibility that protects future credibility.", "Lila": "Lila must position herself to minimize conflict by confirming her own schedule, acc... | {"Elena": "Elena must monitor whether Lila shows agreement, hesitation, interruption, narrowed gaze, or posture tension and then adjust detail, pacing, and reassurance to keep Lila accepting the stated job-search plan.", "Lila": "Lila must watch for Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, averted gaze, or bodily tens... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila reach an explicitly stated agreement that Lila will go to the coffee shop shift and Elena will spend the day on a job search, with Lila's accepting words and reduced questioning showing that Elena's responsible role in the day's plan has been maintained.", "Lila": "Lila and Elena conclude the ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Lila expects the morning discussion to produce a workable plan in which Elena will use the day to pursue employment.", "desire": "To preserve Lila's view that she is taking responsible next steps toward paid work.", "intention": "To present her plan for the day as a genuine job search and align wi... | images/scenario_002/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_03 | scenario_003 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the entrance to an exhibit, Elena asks Ben whether the woman who has just appeared outside the exhibit is his ex-wife, seeking a clear identification while the woman is close enough to be noticed and acknowledged. Ben answers in a way that keeps the situation understandable at the exhibit boundary as he prepares t... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "36", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "museum visitor"}, "Elena": {"age": "35", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "museum visitor"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer Elena's identification question with a clear truthful statement about whether the nearby woman is Ben's ex-wife so the relation is understandable at the exhibit entrance.", "Elena": "Elena must ask Ben directly whether the nearby woman is Ben's ex-wife using plain identifying language that make... | {"Ben": "Ben must accommodate the need for clarity by giving a concise answer that supports smooth acknowledgment of the nearby woman while maintaining workable movement toward the Ice Age section.", "Elena": "Elena must position the question as a brief clarification that preserves straightforward interaction at the ex... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, and the nearby woman's gaze, facial changes, or posture shifts, then adjust timing and brevity to keep the identification clear without appearing evasive or socially uncoordinated.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shi... | {"Ben": "Ben provides a clear truthful identification in response to Elena, evidenced by Ben's concise reply, Elena's acceptance or cessation of clarification, and both participants' observable orientation toward the nearby woman so that the relation is understood while movement toward the Ice Age section remains worka... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes Elena is asking whether the nearby woman is his ex-wife and that the woman's presence near the exhibit entrance makes his response socially consequential to both of them.", "desire": "Ben wants the identification of the woman and his relation to her to be understood without creating soc... | images/scenario_003/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_04 | scenario_004 | low | Eristic | 3 | Diane; Harold; Lily | During the family dinner, Diane and Lily openly contest the meaning and implication of a loaded remark about a failed wedding and the money tied to it, each pressing for her position to be recognized. Harold joins the discussion in a way that backs a side and intensifies the dispute, turning the meal into a direct fami... | {"Diane": "Quarreller", "Harold": "Auxiliary", "Lily": "Quarreller"} | {"Diane": "Honest Signaling", "Harold": "Honest Signaling", "Lily": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Diane": "Collaborating", "Harold": "Accommodating", "Lily": "Collaborating"} | {"Diane": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Retired"}, "Harold": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Retired professional"}, "Lily": {"age":... | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Harold": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Diane at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Harold": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Harold at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must state Diane's interpretation of the remark and its money implication plainly and consistently, using direct wording and steady eye contact so Diane's stance is visibly transparent rather than implied.", "Harold": "Harold must openly name which side Harold judges as justified and give explicit reas... | {"Diane": "Diane must pursue recognition of Diane's position by inviting point-by-point examination of the remark while continuing to defend Diane's stance as reasonable within the family discussion.", "Harold": "Harold must support the side Harold sees as justified in a relationship-preserving manner by validating the... | {"Diane": "Diane must watch for Lily's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, or averted gaze and then adjust Diane's pace and specificity by pausing for response, restating key points, or narrowing the claim to keep Diane's position from being cast as unfair.", "Harold": "Harold must monitor agreemen... | {"Diane": "Diane's clear defense and responsive clarification lead to a family exchange in which Lily directly contests Diane's interpretation, Harold explicitly judges the issue on one side, and Diane's position is openly treated as a valid point under dispute rather than dismissed as unfair.", "Harold": "Harold's exp... | {"Diane": {"belief": "She believes Lily has taken a remark about the failed wedding and its money implications as a personal challenge at the dinner table.", "desire": "She wants her position on the matter to be recognized as valid within the family discussion.", "intention": "She commits to directly maintaining and cl... | images/scenario_004/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_01.jpg", "Harold": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_05 | scenario_005 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Lucas | In the rehearsal apartment, Ethan uses the script pages to prompt Lucas for the next responses so they can keep the dialogue sequence accurate. Lucas answers each prompt with the expected lines, allowing them to stay coordinated as they move through multiple dramatic scenes without leaving their practice spot. | {"Ethan": "Questioner", "Lucas": "Answerer"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lucas": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lucas": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}, "Lucas": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should give only the minimum script cues needed to elicit Lucas's next lines while withholding extra explanation about uncertainty so the dialogue order stays accurate without exposing possible gaps.", "Lucas": "Lucas should deliver the expected lines with slightly amplified clarity and emphasis after ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the rehearsal as a shared exchange by prompting in sequence while accepting small adjustments from Lucas to preserve coordination and avoid looking unreliable.", "Lucas": "Lucas should balance accurate line delivery with minor concessions in pacing or phrasing alignment when Ethan's pro... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lucas's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and then shorten, repeat, or reframe prompts to keep the rehearsal moving in correct order.", "Lucas": "Lucas should monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, page-checking, gaze direction, or tension cues an... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lucas complete multiple scenes in the correct dialogue order from Ethan's minimal prompts and Lucas's matching responses, with Ethan's prompt adjustments and Lucas's acceptance of pacing support visible in their speech, page-checking, and coordinated turn transitions.", "Lucas": "Lucas and Ethan su... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lucas knows the corresponding responses for the scenes they are rehearsing, and accurate prompting will help them keep the dialogue sequence correct.", "desire": "To maintain a coordinated and accurate rehearsal exchange across the selected scenes.", "intention": "To guide the progression of the s... | images/scenario_005/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_06 | scenario_006 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the coffeehouse lounge, Ethan presses Lila to confirm exactly what was found in the drink so the group has a clear account of it. Lila describes the object and offers to verify it directly, while Ben inserts a light remark that helps keep the exchange manageable before the others quickly decline to see it. | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": "28"... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben makes a light but truthful remark that acknowledges the unpleasant discovery without adding false detail or diverting from the incident.", "Ethan": "Ethan asks Lila for exact verbal confirmation of what was found in the drink using specific, non-exaggerated wording that makes the account explicit.", "Lila"... | {"Ben": "Ben prioritizes conversational manageability by softening the moment in a way that supports the others' discussion rather than pushing his own line.", "Ethan": "Ethan frames the exchange as a joint fact-checking effort by inviting Lila's clarification so the group can settle on one reliable account.", "Lila": ... | {"Ben": "Ben tracks whether Ethan and Lila continue smoothly or show interruption, pause, tight posture, or strained expressions, then adjusts by briefly easing the tone or falling silent to avoid adding awkwardness.", "Ethan": "Ethan monitors Lila's precision and the others' hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or ... | {"Ben": "Ben's light remark helps Ethan and Lila complete a clear verbal confirmation of what was found in the drink, and the others' quick refusal of direct verification marks the exchange as manageable without derailing the shared account.", "Ethan": "Ethan obtains Lila's explicit verbal confirmation of what was foun... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The discovery is unpleasant enough to disrupt the conversation, and the group needs a way to acknowledge it without dwelling on the most graphic aspect.", "desire": "To keep the exchange socially manageable while still aligning with the group's discussion of the incident.", "intention": "To frame th... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_07 | scenario_006 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the lounge area of the busy coffeehouse, Ethan responds to Lila's report with disbelief and asks for clearer confirmation of what was in the drink. Lila answers by describing the object and briefly offers additional confirmation, while Ben inserts a joking remark that helps steer the exchange away from a direct disp... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": ... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use a plainly recognizable joking remark to acknowledge the unpleasant discovery without adding false details or inviting a more graphic account.", "Ethan": "Ethan should ask for verbal clarification about what was in the drink while withholding any request for a direct display and treating the acco... | {"Ben": "Ben should accommodate the group by redirecting the exchange away from direct display and toward a socially manageable close rather than pursuing his own curiosity.", "Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange toward a quick shared description that balances Lila's account with the group's preference not to e... | {"Ben": "Ben should watch for agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruption patterns, strained smiles, stiff posture, and gaze shifts, then adjust the timing and strength of the joke or stop redirecting if the group continues seeking clarification.", "Ethan": "Ethan should monitor Lila's hesitation, Ben's reframing, i... | {"Ben": "Ben's joking remark is taken up by Ethan and Lila as a cue to close the topic, resulting in the group recognizing Lila's account of what was in the drink while jointly refusing to inspect it further.", "Ethan": "Ethan reaches a shared verbal understanding with Lila and Ben of what was found in the drink throug... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the discovery is unpleasant and that the group is trying to manage it conversationally rather than dwell on it.", "desire": "He wants to align with the group by acknowledging the incident while helping keep the exchange socially manageable.", "intention": "He commits to adding a joking ... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_08 | scenario_007 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Diane | During a brief lull in service, Elena and Diane confer near their station in direct, practical terms about whether ending an unsatisfying relationship is the clearest option. Their conversation weighs the value of making a definite decision against the risk of disrupting the five other people socially connected to the ... | {"Diane": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Diane": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Diane": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Diane": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "head chef"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}} | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Diane at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must honestly voice that ending the relationship may be justified while explicitly noting that the decision could disrupt obligations and standing with the wider connected group.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that the choice is whether ending the unsatisfying relationship is the clearest workabl... | {"Diane": "Diane must display an avoiding stance by keeping the assessment practical and limited, emphasizing disruption risks rather than escalating toward a forceful push for a breakup decision.", "Elena": "Elena must use a collaborating stance by framing the discussion as a joint practical evaluation that keeps both... | {"Diane": "Diane must monitor Elena for direct agreement, insistence, interruption, reframing, fixed gaze, forward posture, or tension cues and then shorten responses, redirect to effects on the five others, or pause before committing to stronger wording.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Diane for hesitation, interruption,... | {"Diane": "Diane and Elena arrive at a mutually recognized discussion outcome in which any movement toward ending the relationship remains explicitly qualified by the likely disruption to obligations and standing within the connected group, as shown by Diane's limiting formulation, Elena's acceptance of that qualificat... | {"Diane": {"belief": "Diane believes that ending the relationship may be warranted, but that doing so could complicate obligations and standing within the larger group tied to the partner.", "desire": "Diane wants a course of action that resolves the relationship issue while limiting disruption to the connected group."... | images/scenario_007/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_09 | scenario_008 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Clara; Elena; Mia | In the quiet café near the front seating area, Clara argues that Elena should come back and treats Elena's restaurant job as insufficient reason to stay. Elena insists that the job shows she is building a life where she is, while Mia joins in by disputing that claim and pushing the discussion further against Elena's po... | {"Clara": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Exaggeration", "Mia": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Elena": "Compromising", "Mia": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Elena": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "20s", "character... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should overstate how little Elena's restaurant job proves about a stable future while avoiding claims that directly contradict Clara's stated position so Clara's argument appears forceful rather than dismissible interference.", "Elena": "Elena should amplify the job's significance as evidence of progre... | {"Clara": "Clara should pursue a compromising line by pressing that returning home is preferable while offering limited acknowledgment that Elena's job has some value so the discussion stays centered on a middle-ground evaluation.", "Elena": "Elena should use a compromising stance by firmly defending the job as meaning... | {"Clara": "Clara should watch for Elena's rebuttals, Mia's support, interruptions, tightened posture, gaze withdrawal, or pause-filled hesitation and then adjust by softening wording, repeating the central comparison, or briefly yielding a point before restating why returning home is the better option.", "Elena": "Elen... | {"Clara": "Clara secures a discussion state in which Clara and Mia explicitly treat Elena's restaurant job as limited evidence and Elena is pushed to acknowledge at least some limit on what the job proves about staying, as shown through the dialogue, Elena's narrowed defense, and Clara's and Mia's responsive timing and... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Elena is using her restaurant job to justify staying away and that the current discussion is a chance to argue that returning home is the better course.", "desire": "Clara wants Elena to accept that coming back is a reasonable and preferable option.", "intention": "Clara intends to ... | images/scenario_008/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_01.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_10 | scenario_009 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In the busy coffeehouse, Ethan uses the brief conversation to argue that it makes sense for him to join Lila at the laundromat later that evening, without fully stating all of his reasons. Lila presses him on both the justification and the setup, and their exchange narrows into a cautious agreement to meet there around... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should describe joining the laundromat trip as practical and straightforward while omitting part of the underlying motive, so Ethan's dialogue and pauses show Strategic Withholding without contradicting the stated plan.", "Lila": "Lila should use Exaggeration by stressing how unclear or inconvenient an... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should use a collaborating stance by framing the seven o'clock laundromat meeting as workable for both Ethan and Lila and by inviting terms that make the arrangement easier for Lila to accept.", "Lila": "Lila should maintain a collaborating stance by pressing for specific justification and timing while... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's follow-up questions, hesitation, interruptions, narrowed gaze, or posture tightening and then adjust by adding concrete logistics, reducing pressure, or reframing the proposal as a manageable shared plan.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ethan's agreement, evasive wording, interru... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach a cautious verbal agreement that Ethan can join Lila at the laundromat around seven after Ethan presents the visit as practical, leaves some motive unstated, and answers enough of Lila's questions for Lila to signal acceptance through explicit wording and eased behavioral cues.", "Lila":... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is not immediately convinced that his reason for joining her at the laundromat is justified, but she is still considering a possible arrangement for later that evening.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement that he can join her at the laundromat around seven.", "intention": "To present his ... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_11 | scenario_009 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | At a café table, Ethan tries to turn a brief exchange into a later meeting by offering a reason he should join Lila at the laundromat that evening. Lila questions whether his reason and the proposed setup are adequate, and the conversation narrows into a tentative agreement to meet there around seven. | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state a clear and truthful reason for being at the laundromat and name a specific meeting time that shows Ethan is not hiding or inflating the basis for joining Lila there.", "Lila": "Lila must state openly what parts of Ethan's reason or setup remain insufficient and specify the conditions needed... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue agreement by offering a workable plan and showing readiness to adjust details that Lila questions so the arrangement remains acceptable to both sides.", "Lila": "Lila must handle the exchange as a joint clarification task by pressing for concrete details while shaping a bounded arrangement ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's hesitation, interruptions, reframing, narrowed gaze, posture shifts, or pauses and respond by slowing down, clarifying the reason, or tightening the proposed terms until Lila signals tentative acceptance.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's agreements, evasions, interruptions, ga... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach a tentative agreement in dialogue that Ethan will meet Lila at the laundromat around seven after Ethan gives a credible reason, adjusts the setup to Lila's stated conditions, and Lila confirms the narrowed terms through her responses and observable settling of the exchange.", "Lila": "Li... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila has not yet accepted that his presence at the laundromat that evening is appropriate and is evaluating whether his reason for coming makes sense.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement to a specific later meeting at the laundromat under terms she considers acceptable.", "intention": "To pres... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_12 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by the brick wall, Elena and Ben pause after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table, but they interpret its social acceptability differently. Elena insists it is inappropriate for the shared restaurant setting, while Ben directly defends it as not serious enough to condemn, and their disagreement be... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state Ben's view plainly and accurately that the nearby table's behavior does not merit strong condemnation, using transparent wording that directly counters Elena's stronger framing.", "Elena": "Elena must amplify the public impact of the nearby table's behavior in Elena's wording and emphasis so Ben... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the disagreement as a shared assessment of proportionality and restaurant norms while directly defending the behavior as not serious enough to justify Elena's criticism.", "Elena": "Elena must frame the disagreement as a joint evaluation of shared-space norms while firmly steering Ben toward ... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze direction, posture shifts, or visible tension and adjust Ben's timing, bluntness, and explanatory framing to preserve credibility while sustaining Ben's defense.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, interrupt... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a visible conversational break with no shared judgment after Ben plainly defends the nearby table's behavior as not serious enough to condemn and Elena continues to press the opposite view, as shown through their dialogue, internal thought descriptions of continued disagreement, and observa... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the nearby table's intimate behavior does not warrant condemnation in the current setting and that Elena is overstating its inappropriateness.", "desire": "He wants Elena to accept that the behavior is defensible or at least not serious enough to justify strong criticism.", "intention":... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_13 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben stop after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table in the crowded restaurant. Elena argues that the behavior is inappropriate for such a public setting, while Ben resists that framing and defends it, and their disagreement ends without alignment when she leaves... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must use suppression by avoiding full endorsement of Elena's framing and answering in restrained, indirect terms that keep a permissive interpretation available without explicitly conceding impropriety.", "Elena": "Elena must state directly that the nearby behavior is visible and inappropriate for the rest... | {"Ben": "Ben must pursue a compromising stance by resisting Elena's stricter definition while proposing a less absolute framing that avoids treating the behavior as clearly inappropriate.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a collaborating stance by framing the disagreement as a question of shared standards for public conduc... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch Elena for firm agreement demands, hesitation, interruption, sharpened wording, fixed gaze, or withdrawal cues, and respond by softening phrasing, shortening rebuttals, or shifting to a narrower framing when resistance intensifies.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor Ben for agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena must leave the exchange with Ben's permissive interpretation still active rather than conceded away, evidenced by Ben's restrained rebuttals and narrowed framing in dialogue, Elena's continued direct opposition, and the interaction ending in separation without mutual alignment on impropriety.", "... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby couple's behavior does not warrant condemnation in this context, and Elena is judging it too harshly.", "desire": "To prevent the situation from being framed as clearly inappropriate and preserve a more permissive interpretation of what is acceptable in the restaurant.", "intention": "To ... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_14 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben pause after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table and begin arguing over how it should be understood in the restaurant's public atmosphere. Elena insists it is inappropriate and presses for that view to be acknowledged, while Ben resists that judgment and def... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must avoid fully explicit endorsement language and instead use restrained, indirect phrasing that keeps the nearby behavior framed as acceptable without stating the permissive position in maximal terms.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that the nearby behavior is inappropriate in this restaurant and ex... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the disagreement as a joint interpretation problem by inviting standards-based comparison and integrating Elena's concern into a broader account that resists condemnation.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue acknowledgment of Elena's stance by proposing a limited shared formulation about public app... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement cues, hesitation, interruption, fixed gaze, or tension in posture and adjust by softening pace, reframing around context, or adding clarifying distinctions when resistance increases.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's interruptions, hedging, gaze shifts, or dismissive pos... | {"Ben": "Ben brings the exchange to a point where Elena's objection is explicitly acknowledged as one standard in the discussion while the nearby behavior remains uncondemned in Ben's framing, and this unresolved split is observable through Ben's restrained wording, Elena's continued direct challenge, and Elena walking... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby behavior does not warrant condemnation in this setting, and Elena is overclassifying it as inappropriate.", "desire": "To keep the behavior framed as acceptable and prevent the interaction from settling on Elena's negative interpretation.", "intention": "To continue contesting Elena's cla... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_15 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area, Ben addresses Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants her to consider going out with him rather than treating the moment as casual mingling. When he starts to withdraw after stating it, Elena calls him back so the conversation stays centered on clarifying and... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must explicitly restate that the invitation is genuine and personal rather than casual mingling so Elena can evaluate it without guessing his meaning.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that Ben's remark is being treated as a direct invitation and ask what response Ben is seeking so her position is not l... | {"Ben": "Ben must frame the conversation as a joint clarification of what he is proposing and invite Elena's direct consideration instead of pressing only for his preferred outcome.", "Elena": "Elena must keep the exchange on clarifying Ben's proposal while offering a balanced opening for a direct answer that reduces m... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, facial tension, or gaze withdrawal and adjust by clarifying terms, softening intensity, or pausing withdrawal so the invitation receives a meaningful response.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or retreating ... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at a mutually acknowledged outcome in which Ben's invitation is treated in dialogue as a serious personal proposal open to Elena's direct consideration, supported by Ben's clear restatement, paused withdrawal, and Elena's continued engagement and response.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach a... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has already presented his interest as a personal invitation, but his quick withdrawal may leave the proposal unclear or insufficiently engaged.", "desire": "To have Elena seriously consider his invitation as a genuine proposal rather than dismissing it as awkward or offhand talk.", "intention": "... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_16 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area, Ben presents Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he is asking her to consider going out with him rather than engaging in casual conversation. When he starts to withdraw before the exchange is resolved, Elena calls him back so the interaction stays focused on clari... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should present the invitation as a sincere proposal in restrained, unambiguous language while avoiding vague side comments or visible withdrawal that would leave the outcome unclear.", "Elena": "Elena should keep discussion tightly on whether Ben's invitation is being explicitly addressed while using brief... | {"Ben": "Ben should use a compromising stance by inviting a direct answer or a clear next step that preserves workable interaction without pressing beyond what Elena is willing to address.", "Elena": "Elena should use a collaborating stance by holding Ben in the exchange and framing clarification of the proposal as a s... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Elena for agreement, hesitation, reframing, averted gaze, or tension cues and adjust by giving more space, softening intensity, or briefly restating the proposal more clearly.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze withdrawal, or posture shifts toward leavin... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at a clear, verbally acknowledged understanding of what Ben's invitation means and how Elena is responding after Ben stays engaged, states the proposal plainly, and adjusts his delivery to Elena's cues without withdrawing.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach an explicitly stated, mutually unde... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has made a direct personal invitation to Elena in a public social setting, and his initial retreat leaves the outcome uncertain unless the exchange continues.", "desire": "To obtain a clear consideration of his invitation while preserving a workable social understanding with Elena.", "intention":... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_17 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the edge of the seating section, Ben addresses Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants her to consider going out with him rather than treating the moment as casual small talk. As the exchange risks ending ambiguously after his abrupt delivery, Elena calls him back and keeps the conversa... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designe... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use honest signaling by stating in plain terms that the invitation is a real date proposal and avoiding wording that could make the approach sound casual or unserious.", "Elena": "Elena should selectively withhold any acceptance or refusal while explicitly pressing Ben to state the proposal clearly ... | {"Ben": "Ben should enact a compromising stance by presenting the invitation directly while leaving Elena space to question, clarify, or consider the proposal without forcing immediate closure.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a compromising stance by keeping the conversation open and bounded, inviting clarification fro... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, posture changes, and gaze direction and adjust by clarifying the invitation, reducing pressure, or pausing so the proposal remains sincere and recognizable.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or retreating b... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a point where Ben's invitation is openly recognized in dialogue as a sincere date proposal and remains under consideration rather than fading into casual talk, evidenced by Ben's plain confirmation, Elena's continued clarification questions, and both participants' behavioral focus on the pr... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena understands that he is asking for a date, but his initial delivery may leave the proposal unresolved if the exchange ends too quickly.", "desire": "To have his invitation recognized and considered as a sincere personal proposal.", "intention": "To present the invitation plainly enough that Ele... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_18 | scenario_012 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the main living area, Elena pauses with a paper as Leo asks to borrow moisturizer for an important upcoming occasion. After asking what it is for and hearing a brief explanation, she points him to the bathroom and authorizes him to use the moisturizer available there. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Leo": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Leo": "Compromising"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should ask for the purpose of the request and present the bathroom option as a routine clarification while concealing any uncertainty about granting access.", "Leo": "Leo should give only a brief reason for needing moisturizer and suppress extra details about the upcoming occasion while keeping the req... | {"Elena": "Elena should frame the exchange as a shared practical solution by confirming the reason and then directing Leo to the available moisturizer in the bathroom.", "Leo": "Leo should pursue quick approval through a moderate, concession-ready request that accepts Elena's need to verify the purpose before granting ... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's brief agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tension and adjust by shortening questions, softening wording, or giving the bathroom authorization more directly.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's follow-up questions, pauses, reframing, facial scrutiny, or ... | {"Elena": "Elena and Leo reach a visible agreement that Leo's brief explanation is sufficient and that Leo is authorized to use the moisturizer in the bathroom, shown through Elena's directing words or gesture toward the bathroom and Leo's verbal acceptance or movement to comply.", "Leo": "Leo and Elena establish throu... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an important upcoming occasion and the available supply is in the bathroom.", "desire": "To clarify the immediate reason for the request and resolve it appropriately within the apartment.", "intention": "To confirm the purpose of the request and authorize Leo t... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_19 | scenario_012 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the main living area, Elena pauses with a paper while Leo directly asks to use moisturizer he needs immediately for an important upcoming occasion. After briefly confirming what it is for, she directs him to the bathroom and permits him to use the moisturizer available there. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Leo": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Compromising", "Leo": "Avoiding"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should state the brief purpose-check and the bathroom permission plainly so Elena's clarification and authorization are directly visible in Elena's words.", "Leo": "Leo should ask for the moisturizer directly and give a brief truthful reason tied to the upcoming occasion so Leo's need and justification... | {"Elena": "Elena should position the exchange as a quick mutual-resolution by asking one concise verifying question and then offering the bathroom moisturizer as the practical middle-ground solution.", "Leo": "Leo should pursue access while minimizing conflict by keeping the request narrow, accepting Elena's control ov... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's concise agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tension and adjust by shortening the verification, softening the framing, or moving faster to explicit permission.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's confirming question, pauses, reframing, facial changes, ga... | {"Elena": "Elena and Leo reach a mutually acknowledged resolution in which Leo states a brief reason for needing the moisturizer, Elena gives explicit permission to use the moisturizer in the bathroom, and Leo accepts the instruction without further dispute.", "Leo": "Leo and Elena complete an observable permission exc... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an important upcoming occasion and is asking because he cannot readily get it elsewhere at the moment.", "desire": "To clarify the reason for the request and settle an appropriate way for Leo to use the available moisturizer.", "intention": "To verify the purpo... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_20 | scenario_013 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person who was called can be found, and Clara tells him he is in the bathroom while making clear that going in would be inappropriate. Ethan then tries to handle the message directly instead of leaving the matter there, and the exchange ... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must clearly tell Ethan that the person is in the bathroom and explicitly signal that going in would be inappropriate.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state openly that the message needs delivery while verbally acknowledging Clara's warning that entering the bathroom would be inappropriate."} | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a quick middle-ground response by giving Ethan the needed location information while setting a firm limit against intrusion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must position the exchange as a shared problem to solve by proposing a direct but boundary-aware way to get the message to the intended recipient."} | {"Clara": "Clara must track Ethan's follow-up questions, interruptions, attempts to move closer, gaze toward the bathroom, or posture shifts and then tighten wording, repeat the boundary, or shorten the exchange to protect privacy.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption, firm refra... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan establish an observable boundary-respecting outcome in which Clara's warning is accepted as socially binding while the message remains addressed through discussion rather than bathroom entry, as shown by Clara's repeated limit, Ethan's verbal acknowledgment, and both participants' visible ori... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan wants to locate the person who received the phone call, and the person is currently in the bathroom where interruption would be inappropriate.", "desire": "To inform Ethan of the person's location while preserving the other resident's privacy and maintaining acceptable boundaries in the apar... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_21 | scenario_013 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person who received the phone call can be found. Clara truthfully says he is in the bathroom and makes clear that contacting him there would be inappropriate, but Ethan treats the message as something to deliver directly and immediately ... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Avoiding", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state truthfully that the recipient is in the bathroom and explicitly mark that approaching there is inappropriate without softening or obscuring the boundary.", "Ethan": "Ethan should present the message as urgent enough to require direct delivery while concealing that Clara explicitly indicate... | {"Clara": "Clara should minimize escalation by giving only the necessary location information and boundary cue, then avoid extending the exchange into a longer argument.", "Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a quick middle-ground position by verbally framing direct contact as the simplest immediate solution that still lets E... | {"Clara": "Clara should monitor Ethan's reframing, interruption, forward movement, or dismissive gaze and, if these cues appear, restate the boundary more plainly and with firmer timing.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Clara's hesitation, interruption, tightened posture, or averted gaze and, if these cues intensify,... | {"Clara": "Clara's truthful bathroom warning and firmer restatement become a jointly observable boundary marker that Ethan nonetheless crosses, with the outcome evidenced by Clara's explicit dialogue and restrained stance, Ethan's reframing and forward movement, and the later confirmation in dialogue or internal though... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes the intended recipient is in the bathroom and that this makes immediate contact inappropriate.", "desire": "She wants Ethan to recognize that the person's location makes interruption socially unsuitable.", "intention": "She commits to giving accurate location information while signa... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_22 | scenario_014 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | In a private room at the college residence, Daniel confronts Clara near the doorway about whether their relationship will continue on exclusive terms. Clara holds to the understanding that their existing arrangement did not require giving up other romantic ties, while Daniel argues that it should now be defined differe... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Daniel": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state the prior arrangement as clear mutual understanding while selectively obscuring any signs that Clara recognizes Daniel may have interpreted the terms differently.", "Daniel": "Daniel should present exclusivity as the necessary continuation of the relationship while concealing any uncertain... | {"Clara": "Clara should pursue a middle-ground framing that preserves Clara's interpretation of the relationship while offering limited concessions on wording or future discussion rather than accepting exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel should frame the conflict as a shared definition problem and press for explicit exclu... | {"Clara": "Clara should watch for Daniel's interruptions, pauses, narrowed gaze, rigid posture, or reframing attempts and respond by tightening Clara's wording, slowing turn-taking, or redirecting the exchange back to the original arrangement.", "Daniel": "Daniel should monitor Clara's hesitation, deflection, interrupt... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel explicitly acknowledge in dialogue that the prior relationship terms were understood differently, with Clara maintaining that no exclusive commitment had been agreed and Daniel's replies and behavioral cues showing that Daniel does not secure Clara's acceptance of exclusivity in this exchang... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Daniel is challenging the non-exclusive arrangement she understood to be in place and is asking her to choose a more exclusive relationship structure.", "desire": "She wants the relationship terms to remain consistent with the arrangement she believes they already had, without being r... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_23 | scenario_014 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | Inside the college residence room, Daniel confronts Clara near the doorway as their casual encounter turns into a dispute over whether their relationship should become exclusive. Clara resists changing what she understands to be their existing arrangement, while Daniel insists that their connection should take priority... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Daniel": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must use deceptive wording and selective claims about the prior arrangement to steer Daniel toward believing exclusivity was never mutually established while avoiding direct acknowledgment that Daniel can redefine terms.", "Daniel": "Daniel must use deceptive phrasing that presents exclusivity as the i... | {"Clara": "Clara must strategically collaborate by framing the dispute as clarification of mutual understanding and proposing discussion of boundaries without conceding Daniel's demand for exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel must pursue a compromising strategy by asking Clara for explicit priority or exclusivity language ... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Daniel's interruptions, insistence, stare, doorway positioning, and posture tension, and if Daniel intensifies Clara must shorten responses, restate the prior arrangement, or shift framing back to mutual agreement.", "Daniel": "Daniel must track Clara's hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel end the exchange with Clara verbally restating the relationship as previously non-exclusive and Daniel responding in dialogue or visible hesitation without obtaining a clear statement that Clara accepts exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel and Clara end the dispute with Daniel eliciting from Cla... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Daniel is trying to redefine their current arrangement into an exclusive relationship before she leaves.", "desire": "She wants to preserve the existing non-exclusive understanding without conceding that Daniel can set new terms unilaterally.", "intention": "She commits to rejecting D... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_24 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Near the low table in the seating area, Clara and Ethan continue a quieter conversation within the larger gathering about whether enduring love requires intense passion. Clara treats passion as a serious criterion for long-term relationships, while Ethan argues that lasting connection rests more on other forms of close... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state plainly that intense passion remains a serious criterion for judging enduring love and make that standard explicit in Clara's wording without softening or omitting it.", "Ethan": "Ethan must clearly present that lasting connection can rest on forms of closeness other than intense passion and... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a compromising stance by inviting Ethan to name other bases for commitment while repeatedly returning the exchange to whether those bases are sufficient without intense passion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must enact a collaborating stance by treating Clara's standard as worth examining while integra... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then tighten the question, slow the pace, or restate the criterion of passion when Ethan diverts or weakens engagement.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframin... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach an explicit exchange in which Ethan acknowledges in dialogue that intense passion is a serious standard in Clara's evaluation of lasting love, while Clara acknowledges that Ethan's broader forms of closeness remain under consideration, as shown through their statements, pauses, and sust... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes the conversation has become a focused exchange about whether enduring love requires sustained passion and that Ethan is challenging her view by emphasizing other bases for commitment.", "desire": "Clara wants to clarify whether a long-term relationship can be considered valid withou... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_25 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Within the larger gathering, Clara and Ethan sustain a more private conversation near the low table about what should count as lasting love. Clara presses whether a long-term relationship can qualify without intense passion, while Ethan argues that passion fades, elevates other forms of connection, and turns the discus... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state directly that intense passion is a serious criterion in Clara's evaluation of long-term love and explicitly test Ethan's claim without omitting Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that passion fades and that Ethan sees other forms of connection as more important for lastin... | {"Clara": "Clara must use a collaborating stance by inviting Ethan to compare passion with other forms of connection while keeping Clara's criteria central to the discussion of lasting love.", "Ethan": "Ethan must use a compromising stance by acknowledging Clara's emphasis on intense passion but pressing for partial ac... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then sharpen or slow Clara's questions to return the conversation to whether a relationship without intense passion meets Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Clara's agreement, hesitat... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach a point where Ethan explicitly acknowledges in dialogue that intense passion remains a serious standard in Clara's evaluation of lasting love, while Clara continues the exchange by comparing that standard with Ethan's broader criteria rather than allowing Clara's concern to be set aside... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan is framing lasting love as something that can continue after intense passion declines and is applying that view to her situation.", "desire": "To clarify whether a long-term relationship can be valid without intense passion and to have her concern treated as a serious standard for her romant... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_26 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Near the low table in the seating area, Clara and Ethan remain within the larger gathering while focusing on a private discussion about whether lasting love requires intense passion. Clara presses the question as a serious standard for long-term romance, and Ethan argues that passion fades, emphasizing other forms of c... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state directly that Clara is testing whether lasting love without strong passion qualifies as real long-term love and explicitly articulate Clara's standard so Ethan cannot plausibly treat Clara's view as vague.", "Ethan": "Ethan must openly state that Ethan sees passion as fading and present othe... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a compromising stance by pressing Ethan for a workable definition of lasting love while signaling willingness to consider non-passion forms of connection if Ethan also treats passion as a serious criterion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must use a compromising strategy by conceding that passion matters... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture tightening, and adjust by narrowing the question, pausing for response, or restating Clara's point more precisely when Ethan appears to sidestep Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Clara's agree... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan arrive at an explicit shared formulation in dialogue that lasting love can include forms of connection beyond intense passion while Clara's stated requirement that passion remain a serious criterion is acknowledged by Ethan as a valid part of evaluating Clara's romantic future.", "Ethan": "Et... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes the current conversation is a serious exchange about whether enduring love requires intense passion, and that Ethan is presenting a different standard for evaluating long-term relationships while inviting her to apply it to her own situation.", "desire": "She wants to clarify whether ... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_27 | scenario_016 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In the shared apartment's kitchen area, Ben briefly raises the option of providing support before Ethan steps out to a nearby balcony or adjoining outdoor space for a private conversation. Ethan makes clear that he will handle it alone, and their exchange becomes a short agreement that defines Ben's noninvolvement in t... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should present the support offer as lightly optional in dialogue while masking any stronger preference to assist so Ethan receives no pressure toward Ben's involvement.", "Ethan": "Ethan should overstate the sufficiency of going alone in dialogue or self-directed thought so Ben receives an unmistakable mes... | {"Ben": "Ben should prioritize Ethan's preferred arrangement by making a limited offer and then visibly accepting Ethan's decision in order to keep coordination socially appropriate.", "Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a quick middle-ground close by firmly stating solo involvement while phrasing the agreement in a way that... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Ethan's refusals, pauses, reframing, eye direction, and body orientation toward leaving, then withdraw the offer quickly, reduce intensity, and confirm noninvolvement when those signals indicate Ethan wants to proceed alone.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan complete a brief coordinated close in which Ben's lightly framed offer is followed by Ben's observable withdrawal and confirming reply to Ethan's boundary-setting, making it clear in dialogue and behavior that Ben will remain uninvolved while Ethan proceeds alone.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Ben reach ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is about to leave the kitchen for a private conversation, and Ben believes his support may be useful but is not necessarily wanted.", "desire": "To clarify whether Ethan wants assistance so that Ben's role is socially appropriate and coordinated.", "intention": "To offer backup in a limited wa... | images/scenario_016/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_28 | scenario_017 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the counter, Ben begins choking while trying to respond, and Elena immediately assists him until the obstruction is cleared. In the public service area, she then asks whether he is alright and seeks an explicit confirmation from him as he catches his breath so the situation can be clearly understood. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "bank customer"}, "Elena": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "bank customer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the interaction.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the interaction."} | {"Ben": "Ben should give Elena a confirming statement that he is alright even if Ben omits or distorts any remaining uncertainty in order to present the incident as resolved.", "Elena": "Elena should ask Ben for a direct confirmation that he is alright while withholding extra interpretation or reassurance beyond what B... | {"Ben": "Ben should seek a quick middle-ground closure by offering a brief confirmation that lets the interaction move on without extended discussion of the choking episode.", "Elena": "Elena should position the exchange as a shared clarification by briefly coordinating around Ben's spoken condition so the public statu... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's follow-up wording, interruptions, eye focus, and posture for signs that the confirmation is not accepted, then adjust by making the reply shorter, clearer, and more definitive until the exchange closes.", "Elena": "Elena should watch Ben's breath, gaze, posture, pauses, and any hesitat... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a publicly recognizable closure in which Ben gives Elena a brief explicit verbal confirmation that he is alright, Elena accepts that answer without extending the discussion, and Ben's clearer speech, steadier posture, and reduced interruption support that the disruption at the counter is ov... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has just been assisted after choking in front of others at the counter, and Elena is asking him to confirm whether he is alright.", "desire": "To present the situation as under control so the public disruption does not continue.", "intention": "To give Elena a confirming response that the inciden... | images/scenario_017/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_29 | scenario_017 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the counter, Ben begins choking while trying to respond, and Elena immediately addresses the problem as a medical emergency in the public service area. After the obstruction is cleared, she seeks a clear confirmation that he is alright, and Ben is expected to state his condition so the uncertainty around him can be ... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "bank customer"}, "Elena": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "bank customer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must give an honest and direct statement about whether Ben is alright as soon as Ben can speak so others no longer treat the situation as uncertain.", "Elena": "Elena must state openly and directly that Elena needs Ben to confirm whether Ben is alright after the obstruction is cleared so uncertainty at the... | {"Ben": "Ben must follow an avoiding orientation by minimizing prolonged discussion and giving the shortest clear confirmation needed to end the public emergency focus at the counter.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a compromising approach by seeking a quick clear answer from Ben while keeping the exchange brief and focu... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena’s repeated questions, interruptions, reframing, gaze focus, and visible tension cues and respond by answering promptly, clarifying more explicitly if Elena still appears uncertain, or ending the exchange once the confirmation is accepted.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben’s verbal con... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a publicly observable resolution at the counter in which Ben gives a brief direct verbal confirmation about Ben’s condition, and Elena responds by stopping further checks or repeating questions, showing that Ben’s status is accepted as clear.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach a publicly obser... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has just had a choking episode in front of others at the counter, and Elena is asking him to confirm whether he is alright.", "desire": "To communicate a clear status about his condition so the public uncertainty around him is resolved.", "intention": "To provide a direct confirmation to Elena ab... | images/scenario_017/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_30 | scenario_018 | low | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Jade; Clara; Daniel | In the main sitting area, the friends pause around the seating space to resolve how one already-issued invitation to a former partner affects the agreement they had made about whom to invite or avoid for New Year's. Their discussion focuses on whether the pact should still govern the group decision, whether it needs to... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Daniel": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Jade": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Jade": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Daniel": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Jade": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Restaurant manager"}, "Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "University professor"},... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Jade": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade": "No clear facial affect cues are available at ... | {"Clara": "Clara should openly state that the prior pact still matters but that the existing invitation requires a practical interpretation that balances consistency with coordination.", "Daniel": "Daniel should present the issue in amplified terms by stressing that the invitation makes the pact a group-level decision ... | {"Clara": "Clara should advance a fair middle-ground proposal that treats the pact as neither irrelevant nor absolute and asks each person for a manageable concession to preserve cooperation.", "Daniel": "Daniel should push for a collective resolution by framing the disagreement as a shared coordination problem and inv... | {"Clara": "Clara should track interruption, hesitation, reframing, crossed arms, gaze shifts, or tension cues from Ethan, Jade, and Daniel and then adjust by summarizing overlap, narrowing disputed points, or rephrasing the proposal as a coordination step.", "Daniel": "Daniel should observe agreement, interruption, hes... | {"Clara": "Clara, by openly balancing the pact's importance with the practical effect of the existing invitation and asking for manageable concessions, should contribute to Ethan, Jade, and Daniel endorsing a fair middle-ground interpretation in dialogue that preserves cooperation, with overlap in summaries and less te... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The prior pact matters to the group, but the existing invitation means any decision now must balance consistency with practical coordination.", "desire": "To maintain group cooperation while reaching a fair interpretation of the original agreement.", "intention": "To support a middle-ground unders... | images/scenario_018/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_01.jpg", "Jade": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_31 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner near the board and work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge after choosing to write out his answer rather than leave it implied. The conversation shifts from scientific reasoning to a dispute over whether his stated position should count as sufficient grounds for immediate commitment or w... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should selectively state the reasoning behind timing and conditions while withholding any statement that would count as immediate commitment, so Ethan's dialogue shows a defensible standard without conceding more than intended.", "Lila": "Lila should state plainly that Ethan's explicit answer already p... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the dispute as a joint clarification of when an explicit answer justifies commitment, using collaborative language that protects Ethan's standard for waiting from being framed as refusal.", "Lila": "Lila should collaboratively frame the conflict as resolving a mismatch between Ethan's s... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's interruptions, reformulations, fixed gaze toward the written answer, or posture tightening, and Ethan should then slow the pace, restate the timing standard more concretely, or invite narrower clarification to keep the exchange on conditions rather than immediate commitment.", "... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila explicitly settle the exchange on a shared formulation that Ethan's written answer does not by itself require immediate commitment because further timing conditions remain relevant, as shown by Ethan's concrete restatement, Lila's narrowed response, and both participants' attention returning f... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila has directly challenged his decision to make his position explicit, and the discussion now centers on whether his condition for the right moment is justified rather than merely theoretical.", "desire": "To have his standard for waiting recognized as reasonable and to avoid being pressed into ... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_32 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner of the science building near a board and work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge by writing out his position rather than leaving it implied. As the exchange continues, the discussion shifts from theoretical reasoning to a dispute over whether his carefully stated standard for the right m... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his written standard in qualified terms while leaving his immediate commitment unstated, so his dialogue and writing show justification without a direct yes-or-no answer.", "Lila": "Lila must state plainly that Ethan's appeal to the right moment postpones a direct answer, so her dialogue ope... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position the exchange as a joint examination of when action is justified by inviting Lila to evaluate his stated conditions rather than treating the dispute as a simple demand for commitment.", "Lila": "Lila must press for a near-term resolution by narrowing the issue from abstract standards to wh... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or tightened posture and respond by either clarifying his written conditions more explicitly or shortening his explanation to avoid appearing evasive.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ethan's hedging, added qualifications, pauses, gaze shifts, or co... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicit point in the exchange where Ethan's written conditions are jointly recognized in dialogue and behavior as a stated basis for postponement rather than a missing answer, while Lila's narrowed questioning and Ethan's clarifications make the disagreement over immediate commitment... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is no longer treating the exchange as only a theoretical discussion and is pressing him to state whether he will move from a carefully qualified position to a direct commitment now.", "desire": "To preserve a defensible standard for when action is justified while not appearing to evade Lila's... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_33 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner of the university science building, near a board and surrounding work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge after choosing to write out his position rather than leave it implied. What began as scientific reasoning now centers on whether his stated standard for the right moment remains defen... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should state only enough of his reasoning to defend the legitimacy of the right-moment standard while omitting any direct declaration that would amount to immediate commitment.", "Lila": "Lila should openly state that Ethan's explicit standard for the right moment is the issue and directly ask whether ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange as requiring partial acknowledgment of Lila's challenge and a middle-ground defense of conditional action rather than accepting Lila's push for immediate action outright.", "Lila": "Lila should frame the dispute as a shared clarification problem by directly testing Ethan's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or posture shifts toward the board and respond by tightening or softening his wording to preserve the standard without appearing inconsistent or evasive.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ethan's hesitation, qualification, gaze withdrawal, or r... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an exchange in which Ethan verbally concedes part of Lila's challenge while explicitly keeping the right-moment standard in place, and Lila's narrowed follow-up and continued attention show that Ethan's position remains contestable but not dismissible as absent or wholly unclear.", "Lila... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is directly challenging whether his stated standard for the right moment is justified in this conversation, and his choice to make his answer explicit has made his position open to scrutiny beyond the original physics topic.", "desire": "To preserve the legitimacy of his standard while keepin... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_34 | scenario_020 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Lena | Beside a lab worktable crowded with tools and documents, Ethan and Lena confer about which items can be moved so the surface can be used for an immediate interaction without disrupting the lab's professional order. Their brief coordination at the bench centers on creating a temporary, mutually acceptable arrangement wi... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lena": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Avoiding", "Lena": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Research Scientist"}, "Lena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Lab Technician"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly which items Ethan believes can be moved for a brief use of the table and explicitly mark the change as temporary and orderly.", "Lena": "Lena must keep Lena's stance partly indirect by selectively naming which items should remain undisturbed while leaving some preferences unstated un... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a low-friction alignment by proposing only minimal item movement and avoiding broad claims about reorganizing the bench.", "Lena": "Lena must seek a quick middle-ground arrangement by identifying some materials to keep in place and some to set aside temporarily so the interaction can procee... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Lena for hesitation, interruption, gaze checks toward specific tools or documents, and posture tightening, then reduce proposal scope, pause, or restate the adjustment as limited and practical.", "Lena": "Lena must monitor Ethan for agreement, hesitation, reframing, gaze toward crowded areas... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena explicitly agree in dialogue on a small set of items to set aside temporarily and a larger set to leave untouched, with Ethan's plain wording, narrowed proposals, and responses to Lena's hesitation producing an observable, orderly clearing of usable table space.", "Lena": "Lena and Ethan reach... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The worktable is too crowded for their immediate interaction unless some items are selectively moved, and Lena is coordinating with him about what can be cleared.", "desire": "To establish a mutually acceptable way to use the table briefly without disrupting the professional order of the lab.", "i... | images/scenario_020/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_35 | scenario_021 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, Elena presses for an immediate decision about the evening and makes clear that she wants Ben to remain there with her rather than move on to other plans. Ben agrees, and as the shared space is cleared for their use, the exchange settles into a mutually recognized shift from practical coordination to... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Avoiding"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must verbally confirm staying with Elena while using selective wording that presents the decision as settled and coordinated without revealing any competing inclination toward other plans.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that Ben staying with Elena in the room is the intended evening plan and avoid in... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the exchange as a joint practical agreement by integrating Elena's proposal with visible coordination around clearing and using the room so the shared plan appears mutually accepted.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue Ben's clear commitment while minimizing extended dispute by pressing for a yes-o... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, posture shifts, gaze, and tension cues, and if Elena shows uncertainty or presses harder, Ben must increase explicit confirmations and practical coordination language while reducing ambiguous phrasing.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptio... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena establish a mutually accepted outcome in which Ben's confirmation and practical coordination around clearing the room are recognized by both as settling the evening plan to remain there together, with no competing plan left active in their dialogue or behavior.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach an ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants a clear decision to stay together in the room, and the shared area needs to be made usable for that choice to hold.", "desire": "To align with Elena's proposal while maintaining a workable shared setting that supports remaining there together.", "intention": "To confirm the shared plan t... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_36 | scenario_021 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, Elena pushes for an immediate decision about the evening by asking Ben to stay with her there, and Ben makes clear that he will. As the table is cleared of items left in the common area, the interaction moves from deciding whether to remain together into confirming a more exclusive focus on each oth... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must honestly state that Ben will stay and align the message with observable action such as clearing the common area so Elena can verify commitment through both words and behavior.", "Elena": "Elena must exaggerate the immediacy and obviousness of staying together in the shared room through direct wording,... | {"Ben": "Ben must manage the interaction with an avoiding orientation by reducing uncertainty and potential friction through concise agreement and practical organizing rather than extended negotiation about the decision.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue agreement by accommodating Ben's response space while still framing s... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial tension, posture shifts, and gaze direction, then respond by clarifying commitment more explicitly if signals show doubt or by keeping the exchange brief and task-focused if signals show acceptance.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's agre... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena establish an observable shared outcome in which Ben's clear statement that Ben will stay is confirmed by Elena's accepting response and by both participants clearing the common area in a way that shifts the interaction from deciding into jointly focusing the evening on each other in that room.", ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants a clear answer about whether he will stay, and the shared space needs to be made usable if they are to remain there together.", "desire": "To confirm his willingness to stay while showing that he is aligned with Elena about continuing the evening in that space.", "intention": "To signal ... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_37 | scenario_022 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Ethan; Benjamin; Miles | In the apartment's kitchen-living area, Benjamin insists the boundary crossing was only a drunken mistake and that nothing beyond it occurred, trying to narrow how the situation is understood. Ethan directly challenges both Benjamin and Miles over what was kept from him, pushing for open acknowledgment of the breach be... | {"Benjamin": "Proponent", "Ethan": "Respondent", "Miles": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Miles": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Benjamin": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Miles": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "corporate employee"}, "Mil... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Surprise", "Miles": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan displays visible shock upon learning that Benjamin kissed Ethan's mom.", "Miles": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Miles at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must keep statements narrowly focused on the incident as a one-time drunken mistake and remain indirect about any broader implications so that suspicion of something more serious is not fed.", "Ethan": "Ethan must amplify the significance of what was concealed and the breach of trust in direct st... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must offer a limited account that concedes the boundary crossing but repeatedly positions the matter as isolated in order to contain judgment and preserve standing within the group.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press Benjamin and Miles for a shared, explicit account of what happened while framing ackno... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must monitor Ethan's interruptions, challenges, fixed gaze, posture shifts, and tension cues, and respond by shortening claims, lowering the scope of his framing, or repeating the isolated-incident formulation when escalation increases.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for hesitation, interruption, r... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin secures an interactional outcome in which Ethan's challenge results in Benjamin's account being accepted only as a one-time drunken mistake with nothing further claimed by Miles, evidenced through Benjamin's repeated narrow wording, Miles's non-expansive responses, and Ethan's eventual turn towar... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "Ethan sees his conduct as crossing a family boundary and suspects that Benjamin is concealing something more serious.", "desire": "To limit the interpretation of the incident to a one-time drunken mistake and prevent it from being treated as a larger betrayal.", "intention": "To frame the event... | images/scenario_022/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_01.jpg", "Miles": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
AgentViSS Dataset
This repository contains the public data package for AgentViSS: Can Agents Read the Room? Benchmarking Visual Social Intelligence in Multimodal Simulation.
Files
.
+-- README.md
+-- train.jsonl
+-- data.json
+-- images/
+-- scenario_001/
| +-- group_labeled.png
| +-- individual/
| +-- character_01.jpg
| +-- character_02.jpg
+-- ...
train.jsonlis a viewer-friendly table with 240 AgentViSS records. It exposes key fields fromdata.jsonand keeps image path columns at the end.data.jsoncontains the canonical full records.images/contains all image assets referenced bydata.json.- Image paths in
data.jsonare package-relative. Resolve them from the dataset repository root. - All images are resized proportionally so that the longest edge is at most 512 pixels.
Dataset Structure
Each record includes an anonymized scenario id, dialogue type, conflict level, characters, role-level information, goals, emotions, and image paths.
The Hugging Face Dataset Viewer is configured to read train.jsonl rather than
the raw images/ directory. This keeps the viewer organized around the 240
scenario records instead of displaying the 282 image files as separate rows.
Important image fields:
group_image_labeled: path to the scenario-level group image.individual_images: mapping from character names to role portrait paths.
Example:
{
"id": "agentviss_low_01",
"source_scenario": "scenario_001",
"group_image_labeled": "images/scenario_001/group_labeled.png",
"individual_images": {
"CharacterName": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_01.jpg"
}
}
The fields base_json_path, group_image, background, and
individual_informations.*.personality are not included in this public data
package.
Download
Download the full dataset, including images, with huggingface_hub:
import json
from pathlib import Path
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
root = Path(snapshot_download(
repo_id="JunsWan/AgentViSS",
repo_type="dataset",
))
records = json.loads((root / "data.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
first_group_image = root / records[0]["group_image_labeled"]
For the flattened viewer table:
import json
from pathlib import Path
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
root = Path(snapshot_download(
repo_id="JunsWan/AgentViSS",
repo_type="dataset",
))
with (root / "train.jsonl").open(encoding="utf-8") as f:
rows = [json.loads(line) for line in f]
You can also clone the repository:
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/JunsWan/AgentViSS
- Downloads last month
- 300