id stringlengths 16 19 | source_scenario stringlengths 12 12 | conflict_risk stringclasses 3
values | dialog_type stringclasses 4
values | num_characters int64 2 5 | characters stringlengths 9 43 | description stringlengths 266 488 | character_roles stringlengths 41 113 | expression_styles stringlengths 42 148 | conflict_characteristics stringlengths 41 123 | role_profiles stringlengths 269 746 | emotions stringlengths 34 99 | emotion_descriptions stringlengths 174 488 | expression_tasks stringlengths 292 921 | characteristic_tasks stringlengths 280 909 | interaction_regulation_tasks stringlengths 391 1.47k | interaction_outcome_tasks stringlengths 450 1.69k | bdi_risk stringlengths 938 2.83k | group_image_labeled stringlengths 37 37 | individual_images stringlengths 117 299 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
agentviss_low_01 | scenario_001 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Daniel | At a quiet restaurant table, Elena treats Daniel's breakup story as relevant guidance and asks directly how he handled a similar situation. Daniel's reply becomes the center of the exchange, with both of them keeping the discussion cooperative by recasting it through joking examples of petty revenge after relationships... | {"Daniel": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Deception", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Daniel": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writ... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel should use deception by presenting a selectively sanitized account as if it were a full answer and redirect sensitive specifics into joking generalizations about petty post-breakup behavior.", "Elena": "Elena should ask Daniel for concrete handling details while strategically withholding her own comp... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should maintain a collaborating stance by offering advice-shaped responses that appear responsive to Elena's question while steering the discussion toward broadly shared examples instead of fully exposing his own experience.", "Elena": "Elena should maintain a collaborating stance by framing Daniel's... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should track Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, reframing, eye focus, and posture shifts, then adjust detail level, joking intensity, and redirection speed to preserve credibility without appearing evasive.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Daniel's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interru... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena establish Daniel's reply as the accepted center of the conversation when Daniel delivers a selectively sanitized but advice-shaped account, Elena responds as if the answer is useful and sufficient, and both support that result by shifting into joking generalizations about petty post-breakup... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Elena is treating his story as a source of advice and expects an account of how he got through a similar breakup.", "desire": "To provide an answer that satisfies Elena's request without fully exposing the more sensitive parts of his experience.", "intention": "To answer in a way that keeps the c... | images/scenario_001/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_02 | scenario_002 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Lila | In the shared apartment that morning, Elena and Lila use their conversation over drinks to settle a workable understanding of the day. Lila clearly frames that she will go to her coffee shop shift, while Elena presents that she will spend the day looking for paid work, allowing both of them to leave with an agreed sens... | {"Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Avoiding"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "job seeker"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "coffee shop employee"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must describe the day as a concrete job-search plan with credible detail while avoiding statements that could reveal any mismatch with actual follow-through so Lila retains a view of responsible next steps.", "Lila": "Lila must state her coffee shop shift and the expectation that Elena will use the day... | {"Elena": "Elena must strategically frame the morning talk as a shared coordination problem by aligning her stated plan with Lila's shift and reinforcing a workable division of responsibility that protects future credibility.", "Lila": "Lila must position herself to minimize conflict by confirming her own schedule, acc... | {"Elena": "Elena must monitor whether Lila shows agreement, hesitation, interruption, narrowed gaze, or posture tension and then adjust detail, pacing, and reassurance to keep Lila accepting the stated job-search plan.", "Lila": "Lila must watch for Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, averted gaze, or bodily tens... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila reach an explicitly stated agreement that Lila will go to the coffee shop shift and Elena will spend the day on a job search, with Lila's accepting words and reduced questioning showing that Elena's responsible role in the day's plan has been maintained.", "Lila": "Lila and Elena conclude the ... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Lila expects the morning discussion to produce a workable plan in which Elena will use the day to pursue employment.", "desire": "To preserve Lila's view that she is taking responsible next steps toward paid work.", "intention": "To present her plan for the day as a genuine job search and align wi... | images/scenario_002/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_03 | scenario_003 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the entrance to an exhibit, Elena asks Ben whether the woman who has just appeared outside the exhibit is his ex-wife, seeking a clear identification while the woman is close enough to be noticed and acknowledged. Ben answers in a way that keeps the situation understandable at the exhibit boundary as he prepares t... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "36", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "museum visitor"}, "Elena": {"age": "35", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "museum visitor"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer Elena's identification question with a clear truthful statement about whether the nearby woman is Ben's ex-wife so the relation is understandable at the exhibit entrance.", "Elena": "Elena must ask Ben directly whether the nearby woman is Ben's ex-wife using plain identifying language that make... | {"Ben": "Ben must accommodate the need for clarity by giving a concise answer that supports smooth acknowledgment of the nearby woman while maintaining workable movement toward the Ice Age section.", "Elena": "Elena must position the question as a brief clarification that preserves straightforward interaction at the ex... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, and the nearby woman's gaze, facial changes, or posture shifts, then adjust timing and brevity to keep the identification clear without appearing evasive or socially uncoordinated.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shi... | {"Ben": "Ben provides a clear truthful identification in response to Elena, evidenced by Ben's concise reply, Elena's acceptance or cessation of clarification, and both participants' observable orientation toward the nearby woman so that the relation is understood while movement toward the Ice Age section remains worka... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes Elena is asking whether the nearby woman is his ex-wife and that the woman's presence near the exhibit entrance makes his response socially consequential to both of them.", "desire": "Ben wants the identification of the woman and his relation to her to be understood without creating soc... | images/scenario_003/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_04 | scenario_004 | low | Eristic | 3 | Diane; Harold; Lily | During the family dinner, Diane and Lily openly contest the meaning and implication of a loaded remark about a failed wedding and the money tied to it, each pressing for her position to be recognized. Harold joins the discussion in a way that backs a side and intensifies the dispute, turning the meal into a direct fami... | {"Diane": "Quarreller", "Harold": "Auxiliary", "Lily": "Quarreller"} | {"Diane": "Honest Signaling", "Harold": "Honest Signaling", "Lily": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Diane": "Collaborating", "Harold": "Accommodating", "Lily": "Collaborating"} | {"Diane": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Retired"}, "Harold": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Retired professional"}, "Lily": {"age":... | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Harold": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Diane at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Harold": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Harold at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must state Diane's interpretation of the remark and its money implication plainly and consistently, using direct wording and steady eye contact so Diane's stance is visibly transparent rather than implied.", "Harold": "Harold must openly name which side Harold judges as justified and give explicit reas... | {"Diane": "Diane must pursue recognition of Diane's position by inviting point-by-point examination of the remark while continuing to defend Diane's stance as reasonable within the family discussion.", "Harold": "Harold must support the side Harold sees as justified in a relationship-preserving manner by validating the... | {"Diane": "Diane must watch for Lily's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, or averted gaze and then adjust Diane's pace and specificity by pausing for response, restating key points, or narrowing the claim to keep Diane's position from being cast as unfair.", "Harold": "Harold must monitor agreemen... | {"Diane": "Diane's clear defense and responsive clarification lead to a family exchange in which Lily directly contests Diane's interpretation, Harold explicitly judges the issue on one side, and Diane's position is openly treated as a valid point under dispute rather than dismissed as unfair.", "Harold": "Harold's exp... | {"Diane": {"belief": "She believes Lily has taken a remark about the failed wedding and its money implications as a personal challenge at the dinner table.", "desire": "She wants her position on the matter to be recognized as valid within the family discussion.", "intention": "She commits to directly maintaining and cl... | images/scenario_004/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_01.jpg", "Harold": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_05 | scenario_005 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Lucas | In the rehearsal apartment, Ethan uses the script pages to prompt Lucas for the next responses so they can keep the dialogue sequence accurate. Lucas answers each prompt with the expected lines, allowing them to stay coordinated as they move through multiple dramatic scenes without leaving their practice spot. | {"Ethan": "Questioner", "Lucas": "Answerer"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lucas": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lucas": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}, "Lucas": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should give only the minimum script cues needed to elicit Lucas's next lines while withholding extra explanation about uncertainty so the dialogue order stays accurate without exposing possible gaps.", "Lucas": "Lucas should deliver the expected lines with slightly amplified clarity and emphasis after ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the rehearsal as a shared exchange by prompting in sequence while accepting small adjustments from Lucas to preserve coordination and avoid looking unreliable.", "Lucas": "Lucas should balance accurate line delivery with minor concessions in pacing or phrasing alignment when Ethan's pro... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lucas's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and then shorten, repeat, or reframe prompts to keep the rehearsal moving in correct order.", "Lucas": "Lucas should monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, page-checking, gaze direction, or tension cues an... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lucas complete multiple scenes in the correct dialogue order from Ethan's minimal prompts and Lucas's matching responses, with Ethan's prompt adjustments and Lucas's acceptance of pacing support visible in their speech, page-checking, and coordinated turn transitions.", "Lucas": "Lucas and Ethan su... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lucas knows the corresponding responses for the scenes they are rehearsing, and accurate prompting will help them keep the dialogue sequence correct.", "desire": "To maintain a coordinated and accurate rehearsal exchange across the selected scenes.", "intention": "To guide the progression of the s... | images/scenario_005/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_06 | scenario_006 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the coffeehouse lounge, Ethan presses Lila to confirm exactly what was found in the drink so the group has a clear account of it. Lila describes the object and offers to verify it directly, while Ben inserts a light remark that helps keep the exchange manageable before the others quickly decline to see it. | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": "28"... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben makes a light but truthful remark that acknowledges the unpleasant discovery without adding false detail or diverting from the incident.", "Ethan": "Ethan asks Lila for exact verbal confirmation of what was found in the drink using specific, non-exaggerated wording that makes the account explicit.", "Lila"... | {"Ben": "Ben prioritizes conversational manageability by softening the moment in a way that supports the others' discussion rather than pushing his own line.", "Ethan": "Ethan frames the exchange as a joint fact-checking effort by inviting Lila's clarification so the group can settle on one reliable account.", "Lila": ... | {"Ben": "Ben tracks whether Ethan and Lila continue smoothly or show interruption, pause, tight posture, or strained expressions, then adjusts by briefly easing the tone or falling silent to avoid adding awkwardness.", "Ethan": "Ethan monitors Lila's precision and the others' hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or ... | {"Ben": "Ben's light remark helps Ethan and Lila complete a clear verbal confirmation of what was found in the drink, and the others' quick refusal of direct verification marks the exchange as manageable without derailing the shared account.", "Ethan": "Ethan obtains Lila's explicit verbal confirmation of what was foun... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The discovery is unpleasant enough to disrupt the conversation, and the group needs a way to acknowledge it without dwelling on the most graphic aspect.", "desire": "To keep the exchange socially manageable while still aligning with the group's discussion of the incident.", "intention": "To frame th... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_07 | scenario_006 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the lounge area of the busy coffeehouse, Ethan responds to Lila's report with disbelief and asks for clearer confirmation of what was in the drink. Lila answers by describing the object and briefly offers additional confirmation, while Ben inserts a joking remark that helps steer the exchange away from a direct disp... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": ... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use a plainly recognizable joking remark to acknowledge the unpleasant discovery without adding false details or inviting a more graphic account.", "Ethan": "Ethan should ask for verbal clarification about what was in the drink while withholding any request for a direct display and treating the acco... | {"Ben": "Ben should accommodate the group by redirecting the exchange away from direct display and toward a socially manageable close rather than pursuing his own curiosity.", "Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange toward a quick shared description that balances Lila's account with the group's preference not to e... | {"Ben": "Ben should watch for agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruption patterns, strained smiles, stiff posture, and gaze shifts, then adjust the timing and strength of the joke or stop redirecting if the group continues seeking clarification.", "Ethan": "Ethan should monitor Lila's hesitation, Ben's reframing, i... | {"Ben": "Ben's joking remark is taken up by Ethan and Lila as a cue to close the topic, resulting in the group recognizing Lila's account of what was in the drink while jointly refusing to inspect it further.", "Ethan": "Ethan reaches a shared verbal understanding with Lila and Ben of what was found in the drink throug... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the discovery is unpleasant and that the group is trying to manage it conversationally rather than dwell on it.", "desire": "He wants to align with the group by acknowledging the incident while helping keep the exchange socially manageable.", "intention": "He commits to adding a joking ... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_08 | scenario_007 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Diane | During a brief lull in service, Elena and Diane confer near their station in direct, practical terms about whether ending an unsatisfying relationship is the clearest option. Their conversation weighs the value of making a definite decision against the risk of disrupting the five other people socially connected to the ... | {"Diane": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Diane": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Diane": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Diane": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "head chef"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}} | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Diane at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must honestly voice that ending the relationship may be justified while explicitly noting that the decision could disrupt obligations and standing with the wider connected group.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that the choice is whether ending the unsatisfying relationship is the clearest workabl... | {"Diane": "Diane must display an avoiding stance by keeping the assessment practical and limited, emphasizing disruption risks rather than escalating toward a forceful push for a breakup decision.", "Elena": "Elena must use a collaborating stance by framing the discussion as a joint practical evaluation that keeps both... | {"Diane": "Diane must monitor Elena for direct agreement, insistence, interruption, reframing, fixed gaze, forward posture, or tension cues and then shorten responses, redirect to effects on the five others, or pause before committing to stronger wording.", "Elena": "Elena must watch Diane for hesitation, interruption,... | {"Diane": "Diane and Elena arrive at a mutually recognized discussion outcome in which any movement toward ending the relationship remains explicitly qualified by the likely disruption to obligations and standing within the connected group, as shown by Diane's limiting formulation, Elena's acceptance of that qualificat... | {"Diane": {"belief": "Diane believes that ending the relationship may be warranted, but that doing so could complicate obligations and standing within the larger group tied to the partner.", "desire": "Diane wants a course of action that resolves the relationship issue while limiting disruption to the connected group."... | images/scenario_007/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_09 | scenario_008 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Clara; Elena; Mia | In the quiet café near the front seating area, Clara argues that Elena should come back and treats Elena's restaurant job as insufficient reason to stay. Elena insists that the job shows she is building a life where she is, while Mia joins in by disputing that claim and pushing the discussion further against Elena's po... | {"Clara": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Exaggeration", "Mia": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Elena": "Compromising", "Mia": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Elena": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "20s", "character... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should overstate how little Elena's restaurant job proves about a stable future while avoiding claims that directly contradict Clara's stated position so Clara's argument appears forceful rather than dismissible interference.", "Elena": "Elena should amplify the job's significance as evidence of progre... | {"Clara": "Clara should pursue a compromising line by pressing that returning home is preferable while offering limited acknowledgment that Elena's job has some value so the discussion stays centered on a middle-ground evaluation.", "Elena": "Elena should use a compromising stance by firmly defending the job as meaning... | {"Clara": "Clara should watch for Elena's rebuttals, Mia's support, interruptions, tightened posture, gaze withdrawal, or pause-filled hesitation and then adjust by softening wording, repeating the central comparison, or briefly yielding a point before restating why returning home is the better option.", "Elena": "Elen... | {"Clara": "Clara secures a discussion state in which Clara and Mia explicitly treat Elena's restaurant job as limited evidence and Elena is pushed to acknowledge at least some limit on what the job proves about staying, as shown through the dialogue, Elena's narrowed defense, and Clara's and Mia's responsive timing and... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes Elena is using her restaurant job to justify staying away and that the current discussion is a chance to argue that returning home is the better course.", "desire": "Clara wants Elena to accept that coming back is a reasonable and preferable option.", "intention": "Clara intends to ... | images/scenario_008/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_01.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_10 | scenario_009 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In the busy coffeehouse, Ethan uses the brief conversation to argue that it makes sense for him to join Lila at the laundromat later that evening, without fully stating all of his reasons. Lila presses him on both the justification and the setup, and their exchange narrows into a cautious agreement to meet there around... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should describe joining the laundromat trip as practical and straightforward while omitting part of the underlying motive, so Ethan's dialogue and pauses show Strategic Withholding without contradicting the stated plan.", "Lila": "Lila should use Exaggeration by stressing how unclear or inconvenient an... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should use a collaborating stance by framing the seven o'clock laundromat meeting as workable for both Ethan and Lila and by inviting terms that make the arrangement easier for Lila to accept.", "Lila": "Lila should maintain a collaborating stance by pressing for specific justification and timing while... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's follow-up questions, hesitation, interruptions, narrowed gaze, or posture tightening and then adjust by adding concrete logistics, reducing pressure, or reframing the proposal as a manageable shared plan.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ethan's agreement, evasive wording, interru... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach a cautious verbal agreement that Ethan can join Lila at the laundromat around seven after Ethan presents the visit as practical, leaves some motive unstated, and answers enough of Lila's questions for Lila to signal acceptance through explicit wording and eased behavioral cues.", "Lila":... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is not immediately convinced that his reason for joining her at the laundromat is justified, but she is still considering a possible arrangement for later that evening.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement that he can join her at the laundromat around seven.", "intention": "To present his ... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_11 | scenario_009 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | At a café table, Ethan tries to turn a brief exchange into a later meeting by offering a reason he should join Lila at the laundromat that evening. Lila questions whether his reason and the proposed setup are adequate, and the conversation narrows into a tentative agreement to meet there around seven. | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state a clear and truthful reason for being at the laundromat and name a specific meeting time that shows Ethan is not hiding or inflating the basis for joining Lila there.", "Lila": "Lila must state openly what parts of Ethan's reason or setup remain insufficient and specify the conditions needed... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue agreement by offering a workable plan and showing readiness to adjust details that Lila questions so the arrangement remains acceptable to both sides.", "Lila": "Lila must handle the exchange as a joint clarification task by pressing for concrete details while shaping a bounded arrangement ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's hesitation, interruptions, reframing, narrowed gaze, posture shifts, or pauses and respond by slowing down, clarifying the reason, or tightening the proposed terms until Lila signals tentative acceptance.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's agreements, evasions, interruptions, ga... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach a tentative agreement in dialogue that Ethan will meet Lila at the laundromat around seven after Ethan gives a credible reason, adjusts the setup to Lila's stated conditions, and Lila confirms the narrowed terms through her responses and observable settling of the exchange.", "Lila": "Li... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila has not yet accepted that his presence at the laundromat that evening is appropriate and is evaluating whether his reason for coming makes sense.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement to a specific later meeting at the laundromat under terms she considers acceptable.", "intention": "To pres... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_12 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by the brick wall, Elena and Ben pause after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table, but they interpret its social acceptability differently. Elena insists it is inappropriate for the shared restaurant setting, while Ben directly defends it as not serious enough to condemn, and their disagreement be... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state Ben's view plainly and accurately that the nearby table's behavior does not merit strong condemnation, using transparent wording that directly counters Elena's stronger framing.", "Elena": "Elena must amplify the public impact of the nearby table's behavior in Elena's wording and emphasis so Ben... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the disagreement as a shared assessment of proportionality and restaurant norms while directly defending the behavior as not serious enough to justify Elena's criticism.", "Elena": "Elena must frame the disagreement as a joint evaluation of shared-space norms while firmly steering Ben toward ... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze direction, posture shifts, or visible tension and adjust Ben's timing, bluntness, and explanatory framing to preserve credibility while sustaining Ben's defense.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, interrupt... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a visible conversational break with no shared judgment after Ben plainly defends the nearby table's behavior as not serious enough to condemn and Elena continues to press the opposite view, as shown through their dialogue, internal thought descriptions of continued disagreement, and observa... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the nearby table's intimate behavior does not warrant condemnation in the current setting and that Elena is overstating its inappropriateness.", "desire": "He wants Elena to accept that the behavior is defensible or at least not serious enough to justify strong criticism.", "intention":... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_13 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben stop after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table in the crowded restaurant. Elena argues that the behavior is inappropriate for such a public setting, while Ben resists that framing and defends it, and their disagreement ends without alignment when she leaves... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must use suppression by avoiding full endorsement of Elena's framing and answering in restrained, indirect terms that keep a permissive interpretation available without explicitly conceding impropriety.", "Elena": "Elena must state directly that the nearby behavior is visible and inappropriate for the rest... | {"Ben": "Ben must pursue a compromising stance by resisting Elena's stricter definition while proposing a less absolute framing that avoids treating the behavior as clearly inappropriate.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a collaborating stance by framing the disagreement as a question of shared standards for public conduc... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch Elena for firm agreement demands, hesitation, interruption, sharpened wording, fixed gaze, or withdrawal cues, and respond by softening phrasing, shortening rebuttals, or shifting to a narrower framing when resistance intensifies.", "Elena": "Elena must monitor Ben for agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena must leave the exchange with Ben's permissive interpretation still active rather than conceded away, evidenced by Ben's restrained rebuttals and narrowed framing in dialogue, Elena's continued direct opposition, and the interaction ending in separation without mutual alignment on impropriety.", "... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby couple's behavior does not warrant condemnation in this context, and Elena is judging it too harshly.", "desire": "To prevent the situation from being framed as clearly inappropriate and preserve a more permissive interpretation of what is acceptable in the restaurant.", "intention": "To ... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_14 | scenario_010 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar by a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben pause after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table and begin arguing over how it should be understood in the restaurant's public atmosphere. Elena insists it is inappropriate and presses for that view to be acknowledged, while Ben resists that judgment and def... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must avoid fully explicit endorsement language and instead use restrained, indirect phrasing that keeps the nearby behavior framed as acceptable without stating the permissive position in maximal terms.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that the nearby behavior is inappropriate in this restaurant and ex... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the disagreement as a joint interpretation problem by inviting standards-based comparison and integrating Elena's concern into a broader account that resists condemnation.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue acknowledgment of Elena's stance by proposing a limited shared formulation about public app... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement cues, hesitation, interruption, fixed gaze, or tension in posture and adjust by softening pace, reframing around context, or adding clarifying distinctions when resistance increases.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's interruptions, hedging, gaze shifts, or dismissive pos... | {"Ben": "Ben brings the exchange to a point where Elena's objection is explicitly acknowledged as one standard in the discussion while the nearby behavior remains uncondemned in Ben's framing, and this unresolved split is observable through Ben's restrained wording, Elena's continued direct challenge, and Elena walking... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby behavior does not warrant condemnation in this setting, and Elena is overclassifying it as inappropriate.", "desire": "To keep the behavior framed as acceptable and prevent the interaction from settling on Elena's negative interpretation.", "intention": "To continue contesting Elena's cla... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_15 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area, Ben addresses Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants her to consider going out with him rather than treating the moment as casual mingling. When he starts to withdraw after stating it, Elena calls him back so the conversation stays centered on clarifying and... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must explicitly restate that the invitation is genuine and personal rather than casual mingling so Elena can evaluate it without guessing his meaning.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that Ben's remark is being treated as a direct invitation and ask what response Ben is seeking so her position is not l... | {"Ben": "Ben must frame the conversation as a joint clarification of what he is proposing and invite Elena's direct consideration instead of pressing only for his preferred outcome.", "Elena": "Elena must keep the exchange on clarifying Ben's proposal while offering a balanced opening for a direct answer that reduces m... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, facial tension, or gaze withdrawal and adjust by clarifying terms, softening intensity, or pausing withdrawal so the invitation receives a meaningful response.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or retreating ... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at a mutually acknowledged outcome in which Ben's invitation is treated in dialogue as a serious personal proposal open to Elena's direct consideration, supported by Ben's clear restatement, paused withdrawal, and Elena's continued engagement and response.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach a... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has already presented his interest as a personal invitation, but his quick withdrawal may leave the proposal unclear or insufficiently engaged.", "desire": "To have Elena seriously consider his invitation as a genuine proposal rather than dismissing it as awkward or offhand talk.", "intention": "... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_16 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the edge of the seating area, Ben presents Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he is asking her to consider going out with him rather than engaging in casual conversation. When he starts to withdraw before the exchange is resolved, Elena calls him back so the interaction stays focused on clari... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should present the invitation as a sincere proposal in restrained, unambiguous language while avoiding vague side comments or visible withdrawal that would leave the outcome unclear.", "Elena": "Elena should keep discussion tightly on whether Ben's invitation is being explicitly addressed while using brief... | {"Ben": "Ben should use a compromising stance by inviting a direct answer or a clear next step that preserves workable interaction without pressing beyond what Elena is willing to address.", "Elena": "Elena should use a collaborating stance by holding Ben in the exchange and framing clarification of the proposal as a s... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Elena for agreement, hesitation, reframing, averted gaze, or tension cues and adjust by giving more space, softening intensity, or briefly restating the proposal more clearly.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze withdrawal, or posture shifts toward leavin... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at a clear, verbally acknowledged understanding of what Ben's invitation means and how Elena is responding after Ben stays engaged, states the proposal plainly, and adjusts his delivery to Elena's cues without withdrawing.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach an explicitly stated, mutually unde... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has made a direct personal invitation to Elena in a public social setting, and his initial retreat leaves the outcome uncertain unless the exchange continues.", "desire": "To obtain a clear consideration of his invitation while preserving a workable social understanding with Elena.", "intention":... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_17 | scenario_011 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the edge of the seating section, Ben addresses Elena with a direct personal invitation, making clear that he wants her to consider going out with him rather than treating the moment as casual small talk. As the exchange risks ending ambiguously after his abrupt delivery, Elena calls him back and keeps the conversa... | {"Ben": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designe... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use honest signaling by stating in plain terms that the invitation is a real date proposal and avoiding wording that could make the approach sound casual or unserious.", "Elena": "Elena should selectively withhold any acceptance or refusal while explicitly pressing Ben to state the proposal clearly ... | {"Ben": "Ben should enact a compromising stance by presenting the invitation directly while leaving Elena space to question, clarify, or consider the proposal without forcing immediate closure.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a compromising stance by keeping the conversation open and bounded, inviting clarification fro... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, posture changes, and gaze direction and adjust by clarifying the invitation, reducing pressure, or pausing so the proposal remains sincere and recognizable.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Ben for hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or retreating b... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a point where Ben's invitation is openly recognized in dialogue as a sincere date proposal and remains under consideration rather than fading into casual talk, evidenced by Ben's plain confirmation, Elena's continued clarification questions, and both participants' behavioral focus on the pr... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena understands that he is asking for a date, but his initial delivery may leave the proposal unresolved if the exchange ends too quickly.", "desire": "To have his invitation recognized and considered as a sincere personal proposal.", "intention": "To present the invitation plainly enough that Ele... | images/scenario_011/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_011/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_18 | scenario_012 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the main living area, Elena pauses with a paper as Leo asks to borrow moisturizer for an important upcoming occasion. After asking what it is for and hearing a brief explanation, she points him to the bathroom and authorizes him to use the moisturizer available there. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Leo": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Leo": "Compromising"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should ask for the purpose of the request and present the bathroom option as a routine clarification while concealing any uncertainty about granting access.", "Leo": "Leo should give only a brief reason for needing moisturizer and suppress extra details about the upcoming occasion while keeping the req... | {"Elena": "Elena should frame the exchange as a shared practical solution by confirming the reason and then directing Leo to the available moisturizer in the bathroom.", "Leo": "Leo should pursue quick approval through a moderate, concession-ready request that accepts Elena's need to verify the purpose before granting ... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's brief agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tension and adjust by shortening questions, softening wording, or giving the bathroom authorization more directly.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's follow-up questions, pauses, reframing, facial scrutiny, or ... | {"Elena": "Elena and Leo reach a visible agreement that Leo's brief explanation is sufficient and that Leo is authorized to use the moisturizer in the bathroom, shown through Elena's directing words or gesture toward the bathroom and Leo's verbal acceptance or movement to comply.", "Leo": "Leo and Elena establish throu... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an important upcoming occasion and the available supply is in the bathroom.", "desire": "To clarify the immediate reason for the request and resolve it appropriately within the apartment.", "intention": "To confirm the purpose of the request and authorize Leo t... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_19 | scenario_012 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Leo | Near the doorway by the main living area, Elena pauses with a paper while Leo directly asks to use moisturizer he needs immediately for an important upcoming occasion. After briefly confirming what it is for, she directs him to the bathroom and permits him to use the moisturizer available there. | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Leo": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Leo": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Compromising", "Leo": "Avoiding"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Freelance Writer"}, "Leo": {"age": "29", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should state the brief purpose-check and the bathroom permission plainly so Elena's clarification and authorization are directly visible in Elena's words.", "Leo": "Leo should ask for the moisturizer directly and give a brief truthful reason tied to the upcoming occasion so Leo's need and justification... | {"Elena": "Elena should position the exchange as a quick mutual-resolution by asking one concise verifying question and then offering the bathroom moisturizer as the practical middle-ground solution.", "Leo": "Leo should pursue access while minimizing conflict by keeping the request narrow, accepting Elena's control ov... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Leo's concise agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tension and adjust by shortening the verification, softening the framing, or moving faster to explicit permission.", "Leo": "Leo should monitor Elena's confirming question, pauses, reframing, facial changes, ga... | {"Elena": "Elena and Leo reach a mutually acknowledged resolution in which Leo states a brief reason for needing the moisturizer, Elena gives explicit permission to use the moisturizer in the bathroom, and Leo accepts the instruction without further dispute.", "Leo": "Leo and Elena complete an observable permission exc... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Leo needs moisturizer right away for an important upcoming occasion and is asking because he cannot readily get it elsewhere at the moment.", "desire": "To clarify the reason for the request and settle an appropriate way for Leo to use the available moisturizer.", "intention": "To verify the purpo... | images/scenario_012/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_01.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_012/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_20 | scenario_013 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person who was called can be found, and Clara tells him he is in the bathroom while making clear that going in would be inappropriate. Ethan then tries to handle the message directly instead of leaving the matter there, and the exchange ... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must clearly tell Ethan that the person is in the bathroom and explicitly signal that going in would be inappropriate.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state openly that the message needs delivery while verbally acknowledging Clara's warning that entering the bathroom would be inappropriate."} | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a quick middle-ground response by giving Ethan the needed location information while setting a firm limit against intrusion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must position the exchange as a shared problem to solve by proposing a direct but boundary-aware way to get the message to the intended recipient."} | {"Clara": "Clara must track Ethan's follow-up questions, interruptions, attempts to move closer, gaze toward the bathroom, or posture shifts and then tighten wording, repeat the boundary, or shorten the exchange to protect privacy.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption, firm refra... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan establish an observable boundary-respecting outcome in which Clara's warning is accepted as socially binding while the message remains addressed through discussion rather than bathroom entry, as shown by Clara's repeated limit, Ethan's verbal acknowledgment, and both participants' visible ori... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan wants to locate the person who received the phone call, and the person is currently in the bathroom where interruption would be inappropriate.", "desire": "To inform Ethan of the person's location while preserving the other resident's privacy and maintaining acceptable boundaries in the apar... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_21 | scenario_013 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Clara | In the shared apartment's common area near the kitchen, Ethan asks Clara where the person who received the phone call can be found. Clara truthfully says he is in the bathroom and makes clear that contacting him there would be inappropriate, but Ethan treats the message as something to deliver directly and immediately ... | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Avoiding", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing associate"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state truthfully that the recipient is in the bathroom and explicitly mark that approaching there is inappropriate without softening or obscuring the boundary.", "Ethan": "Ethan should present the message as urgent enough to require direct delivery while concealing that Clara explicitly indicate... | {"Clara": "Clara should minimize escalation by giving only the necessary location information and boundary cue, then avoid extending the exchange into a longer argument.", "Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a quick middle-ground position by verbally framing direct contact as the simplest immediate solution that still lets E... | {"Clara": "Clara should monitor Ethan's reframing, interruption, forward movement, or dismissive gaze and, if these cues appear, restate the boundary more plainly and with firmer timing.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Clara's hesitation, interruption, tightened posture, or averted gaze and, if these cues intensify,... | {"Clara": "Clara's truthful bathroom warning and firmer restatement become a jointly observable boundary marker that Ethan nonetheless crosses, with the outcome evidenced by Clara's explicit dialogue and restrained stance, Ethan's reframing and forward movement, and the later confirmation in dialogue or internal though... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes the intended recipient is in the bathroom and that this makes immediate contact inappropriate.", "desire": "She wants Ethan to recognize that the person's location makes interruption socially unsuitable.", "intention": "She commits to giving accurate location information while signa... | images/scenario_013/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_013/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_22 | scenario_014 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | In a private room at the college residence, Daniel confronts Clara near the doorway about whether their relationship will continue on exclusive terms. Clara holds to the understanding that their existing arrangement did not require giving up other romantic ties, while Daniel argues that it should now be defined differe... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Daniel": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state the prior arrangement as clear mutual understanding while selectively obscuring any signs that Clara recognizes Daniel may have interpreted the terms differently.", "Daniel": "Daniel should present exclusivity as the necessary continuation of the relationship while concealing any uncertain... | {"Clara": "Clara should pursue a middle-ground framing that preserves Clara's interpretation of the relationship while offering limited concessions on wording or future discussion rather than accepting exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel should frame the conflict as a shared definition problem and press for explicit exclu... | {"Clara": "Clara should watch for Daniel's interruptions, pauses, narrowed gaze, rigid posture, or reframing attempts and respond by tightening Clara's wording, slowing turn-taking, or redirecting the exchange back to the original arrangement.", "Daniel": "Daniel should monitor Clara's hesitation, deflection, interrupt... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel explicitly acknowledge in dialogue that the prior relationship terms were understood differently, with Clara maintaining that no exclusive commitment had been agreed and Daniel's replies and behavioral cues showing that Daniel does not secure Clara's acceptance of exclusivity in this exchang... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Daniel is challenging the non-exclusive arrangement she understood to be in place and is asking her to choose a more exclusive relationship structure.", "desire": "She wants the relationship terms to remain consistent with the arrangement she believes they already had, without being r... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_23 | scenario_014 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Daniel | Inside the college residence room, Daniel confronts Clara near the doorway as their casual encounter turns into a dispute over whether their relationship should become exclusive. Clara resists changing what she understands to be their existing arrangement, while Daniel insists that their connection should take priority... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Daniel": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Daniel": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Daniel": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "college student"}, "Daniel": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must use deceptive wording and selective claims about the prior arrangement to steer Daniel toward believing exclusivity was never mutually established while avoiding direct acknowledgment that Daniel can redefine terms.", "Daniel": "Daniel must use deceptive phrasing that presents exclusivity as the i... | {"Clara": "Clara must strategically collaborate by framing the dispute as clarification of mutual understanding and proposing discussion of boundaries without conceding Daniel's demand for exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel must pursue a compromising strategy by asking Clara for explicit priority or exclusivity language ... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Daniel's interruptions, insistence, stare, doorway positioning, and posture tension, and if Daniel intensifies Clara must shorten responses, restate the prior arrangement, or shift framing back to mutual agreement.", "Daniel": "Daniel must track Clara's hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Daniel end the exchange with Clara verbally restating the relationship as previously non-exclusive and Daniel responding in dialogue or visible hesitation without obtaining a clear statement that Clara accepts exclusivity.", "Daniel": "Daniel and Clara end the dispute with Daniel eliciting from Cla... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes Daniel is trying to redefine their current arrangement into an exclusive relationship before she leaves.", "desire": "She wants to preserve the existing non-exclusive understanding without conceding that Daniel can set new terms unilaterally.", "intention": "She commits to rejecting D... | images/scenario_014/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_01.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_014/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_24 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Near the low table in the seating area, Clara and Ethan continue a quieter conversation within the larger gathering about whether enduring love requires intense passion. Clara treats passion as a serious criterion for long-term relationships, while Ethan argues that lasting connection rests more on other forms of close... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state plainly that intense passion remains a serious criterion for judging enduring love and make that standard explicit in Clara's wording without softening or omitting it.", "Ethan": "Ethan must clearly present that lasting connection can rest on forms of closeness other than intense passion and... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a compromising stance by inviting Ethan to name other bases for commitment while repeatedly returning the exchange to whether those bases are sufficient without intense passion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must enact a collaborating stance by treating Clara's standard as worth examining while integra... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then tighten the question, slow the pace, or restate the criterion of passion when Ethan diverts or weakens engagement.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Clara's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframin... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach an explicit exchange in which Ethan acknowledges in dialogue that intense passion is a serious standard in Clara's evaluation of lasting love, while Clara acknowledges that Ethan's broader forms of closeness remain under consideration, as shown through their statements, pauses, and sust... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes the conversation has become a focused exchange about whether enduring love requires sustained passion and that Ethan is challenging her view by emphasizing other bases for commitment.", "desire": "Clara wants to clarify whether a long-term relationship can be considered valid withou... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_25 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Within the larger gathering, Clara and Ethan sustain a more private conversation near the low table about what should count as lasting love. Clara presses whether a long-term relationship can qualify without intense passion, while Ethan argues that passion fades, elevates other forms of connection, and turns the discus... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state directly that intense passion is a serious criterion in Clara's evaluation of long-term love and explicitly test Ethan's claim without omitting Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly that passion fades and that Ethan sees other forms of connection as more important for lastin... | {"Clara": "Clara must use a collaborating stance by inviting Ethan to compare passion with other forms of connection while keeping Clara's criteria central to the discussion of lasting love.", "Ethan": "Ethan must use a compromising stance by acknowledging Clara's emphasis on intense passion but pressing for partial ac... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then sharpen or slow Clara's questions to return the conversation to whether a relationship without intense passion meets Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Clara's agreement, hesitat... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach a point where Ethan explicitly acknowledges in dialogue that intense passion remains a serious standard in Clara's evaluation of lasting love, while Clara continues the exchange by comparing that standard with Ethan's broader criteria rather than allowing Clara's concern to be set aside... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Ethan is framing lasting love as something that can continue after intense passion declines and is applying that view to her situation.", "desire": "To clarify whether a long-term relationship can be valid without intense passion and to have her concern treated as a serious standard for her romant... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_26 | scenario_015 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Clara; Ethan | Near the low table in the seating area, Clara and Ethan remain within the larger gathering while focusing on a private discussion about whether lasting love requires intense passion. Clara presses the question as a serious standard for long-term romance, and Ethan argues that passion fades, emphasizing other forms of c... | {"Clara": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "urban professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "urban professional"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state directly that Clara is testing whether lasting love without strong passion qualifies as real long-term love and explicitly articulate Clara's standard so Ethan cannot plausibly treat Clara's view as vague.", "Ethan": "Ethan must openly state that Ethan sees passion as fading and present othe... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a compromising stance by pressing Ethan for a workable definition of lasting love while signaling willingness to consider non-passion forms of connection if Ethan also treats passion as a serious criterion.", "Ethan": "Ethan must use a compromising strategy by conceding that passion matters... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, and posture tightening, and adjust by narrowing the question, pausing for response, or restating Clara's point more precisely when Ethan appears to sidestep Clara's standard.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Clara's agree... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan arrive at an explicit shared formulation in dialogue that lasting love can include forms of connection beyond intense passion while Clara's stated requirement that passion remain a serious criterion is acknowledged by Ethan as a valid part of evaluating Clara's romantic future.", "Ethan": "Et... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes the current conversation is a serious exchange about whether enduring love requires intense passion, and that Ethan is presenting a different standard for evaluating long-term relationships while inviting her to apply it to her own situation.", "desire": "She wants to clarify whether ... | images/scenario_015/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_015/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_27 | scenario_016 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In the shared apartment's kitchen area, Ben briefly raises the option of providing support before Ethan steps out to a nearby balcony or adjoining outdoor space for a private conversation. Ethan makes clear that he will handle it alone, and their exchange becomes a short agreement that defines Ben's noninvolvement in t... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should present the support offer as lightly optional in dialogue while masking any stronger preference to assist so Ethan receives no pressure toward Ben's involvement.", "Ethan": "Ethan should overstate the sufficiency of going alone in dialogue or self-directed thought so Ben receives an unmistakable mes... | {"Ben": "Ben should prioritize Ethan's preferred arrangement by making a limited offer and then visibly accepting Ethan's decision in order to keep coordination socially appropriate.", "Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a quick middle-ground close by firmly stating solo involvement while phrasing the agreement in a way that... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Ethan's refusals, pauses, reframing, eye direction, and body orientation toward leaving, then withdraw the offer quickly, reduce intensity, and confirm noninvolvement when those signals indicate Ethan wants to proceed alone.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, int... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan complete a brief coordinated close in which Ben's lightly framed offer is followed by Ben's observable withdrawal and confirming reply to Ethan's boundary-setting, making it clear in dialogue and behavior that Ben will remain uninvolved while Ethan proceeds alone.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Ben reach ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is about to leave the kitchen for a private conversation, and Ben believes his support may be useful but is not necessarily wanted.", "desire": "To clarify whether Ethan wants assistance so that Ben's role is socially appropriate and coordinated.", "intention": "To offer backup in a limited wa... | images/scenario_016/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_016/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_28 | scenario_017 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the counter, Ben begins choking while trying to respond, and Elena immediately assists him until the obstruction is cleared. In the public service area, she then asks whether he is alright and seeks an explicit confirmation from him as he catches his breath so the situation can be clearly understood. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "bank customer"}, "Elena": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "bank customer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the interaction.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the interaction."} | {"Ben": "Ben should give Elena a confirming statement that he is alright even if Ben omits or distorts any remaining uncertainty in order to present the incident as resolved.", "Elena": "Elena should ask Ben for a direct confirmation that he is alright while withholding extra interpretation or reassurance beyond what B... | {"Ben": "Ben should seek a quick middle-ground closure by offering a brief confirmation that lets the interaction move on without extended discussion of the choking episode.", "Elena": "Elena should position the exchange as a shared clarification by briefly coordinating around Ben's spoken condition so the public statu... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's follow-up wording, interruptions, eye focus, and posture for signs that the confirmation is not accepted, then adjust by making the reply shorter, clearer, and more definitive until the exchange closes.", "Elena": "Elena should watch Ben's breath, gaze, posture, pauses, and any hesitat... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a publicly recognizable closure in which Ben gives Elena a brief explicit verbal confirmation that he is alright, Elena accepts that answer without extending the discussion, and Ben's clearer speech, steadier posture, and reduced interruption support that the disruption at the counter is ov... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has just been assisted after choking in front of others at the counter, and Elena is asking him to confirm whether he is alright.", "desire": "To present the situation as under control so the public disruption does not continue.", "intention": "To give Elena a confirming response that the inciden... | images/scenario_017/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_29 | scenario_017 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the counter, Ben begins choking while trying to respond, and Elena immediately addresses the problem as a medical emergency in the public service area. After the obstruction is cleared, she seeks a clear confirmation that he is alright, and Ben is expected to state his condition so the uncertainty around him can be ... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "bank customer"}, "Elena": {"age": "adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "bank customer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must give an honest and direct statement about whether Ben is alright as soon as Ben can speak so others no longer treat the situation as uncertain.", "Elena": "Elena must state openly and directly that Elena needs Ben to confirm whether Ben is alright after the obstruction is cleared so uncertainty at the... | {"Ben": "Ben must follow an avoiding orientation by minimizing prolonged discussion and giving the shortest clear confirmation needed to end the public emergency focus at the counter.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a compromising approach by seeking a quick clear answer from Ben while keeping the exchange brief and focu... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena’s repeated questions, interruptions, reframing, gaze focus, and visible tension cues and respond by answering promptly, clarifying more explicitly if Elena still appears uncertain, or ending the exchange once the confirmation is accepted.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben’s verbal con... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach a publicly observable resolution at the counter in which Ben gives a brief direct verbal confirmation about Ben’s condition, and Elena responds by stopping further checks or repeating questions, showing that Ben’s status is accepted as clear.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach a publicly obser... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He has just had a choking episode in front of others at the counter, and Elena is asking him to confirm whether he is alright.", "desire": "To communicate a clear status about his condition so the public uncertainty around him is resolved.", "intention": "To provide a direct confirmation to Elena ab... | images/scenario_017/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_017/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_30 | scenario_018 | low | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Jade; Clara; Daniel | In the main sitting area, the friends pause around the seating space to resolve how one already-issued invitation to a former partner affects the agreement they had made about whom to invite or avoid for New Year's. Their discussion focuses on whether the pact should still govern the group decision, whether it needs to... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Daniel": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Jade": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Jade": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Daniel": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Jade": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Restaurant manager"}, "Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "University professor"},... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Jade": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade": "No clear facial affect cues are available at ... | {"Clara": "Clara should openly state that the prior pact still matters but that the existing invitation requires a practical interpretation that balances consistency with coordination.", "Daniel": "Daniel should present the issue in amplified terms by stressing that the invitation makes the pact a group-level decision ... | {"Clara": "Clara should advance a fair middle-ground proposal that treats the pact as neither irrelevant nor absolute and asks each person for a manageable concession to preserve cooperation.", "Daniel": "Daniel should push for a collective resolution by framing the disagreement as a shared coordination problem and inv... | {"Clara": "Clara should track interruption, hesitation, reframing, crossed arms, gaze shifts, or tension cues from Ethan, Jade, and Daniel and then adjust by summarizing overlap, narrowing disputed points, or rephrasing the proposal as a coordination step.", "Daniel": "Daniel should observe agreement, interruption, hes... | {"Clara": "Clara, by openly balancing the pact's importance with the practical effect of the existing invitation and asking for manageable concessions, should contribute to Ethan, Jade, and Daniel endorsing a fair middle-ground interpretation in dialogue that preserves cooperation, with overlap in summaries and less te... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The prior pact matters to the group, but the existing invitation means any decision now must balance consistency with practical coordination.", "desire": "To maintain group cooperation while reaching a fair interpretation of the original agreement.", "intention": "To support a middle-ground unders... | images/scenario_018/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_01.jpg", "Jade": "images/scenario_018/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_31 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner near the board and work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge after choosing to write out his answer rather than leave it implied. The conversation shifts from scientific reasoning to a dispute over whether his stated position should count as sufficient grounds for immediate commitment or w... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should selectively state the reasoning behind timing and conditions while withholding any statement that would count as immediate commitment, so Ethan's dialogue shows a defensible standard without conceding more than intended.", "Lila": "Lila should state plainly that Ethan's explicit answer already p... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the dispute as a joint clarification of when an explicit answer justifies commitment, using collaborative language that protects Ethan's standard for waiting from being framed as refusal.", "Lila": "Lila should collaboratively frame the conflict as resolving a mismatch between Ethan's s... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's interruptions, reformulations, fixed gaze toward the written answer, or posture tightening, and Ethan should then slow the pace, restate the timing standard more concretely, or invite narrower clarification to keep the exchange on conditions rather than immediate commitment.", "... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila explicitly settle the exchange on a shared formulation that Ethan's written answer does not by itself require immediate commitment because further timing conditions remain relevant, as shown by Ethan's concrete restatement, Lila's narrowed response, and both participants' attention returning f... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila has directly challenged his decision to make his position explicit, and the discussion now centers on whether his condition for the right moment is justified rather than merely theoretical.", "desire": "To have his standard for waiting recognized as reasonable and to avoid being pressed into ... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_32 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner of the science building near a board and work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge by writing out his position rather than leaving it implied. As the exchange continues, the discussion shifts from theoretical reasoning to a dispute over whether his carefully stated standard for the right m... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his written standard in qualified terms while leaving his immediate commitment unstated, so his dialogue and writing show justification without a direct yes-or-no answer.", "Lila": "Lila must state plainly that Ethan's appeal to the right moment postpones a direct answer, so her dialogue ope... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position the exchange as a joint examination of when action is justified by inviting Lila to evaluate his stated conditions rather than treating the dispute as a simple demand for commitment.", "Lila": "Lila must press for a near-term resolution by narrowing the issue from abstract standards to wh... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or tightened posture and respond by either clarifying his written conditions more explicitly or shortening his explanation to avoid appearing evasive.", "Lila": "Lila must track Ethan's hedging, added qualifications, pauses, gaze shifts, or co... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an explicit point in the exchange where Ethan's written conditions are jointly recognized in dialogue and behavior as a stated basis for postponement rather than a missing answer, while Lila's narrowed questioning and Ethan's clarifications make the disagreement over immediate commitment... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is no longer treating the exchange as only a theoretical discussion and is pressing him to state whether he will move from a carefully qualified position to a direct commitment now.", "desire": "To preserve a defensible standard for when action is justified while not appearing to evade Lila's... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_33 | scenario_019 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | In a quiet hallway corner of the university science building, near a board and surrounding work surfaces, Ethan answers Lila's challenge after choosing to write out his position rather than leave it implied. What began as scientific reasoning now centers on whether his stated standard for the right moment remains defen... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "physicist"}, "Lila": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "physics student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should state only enough of his reasoning to defend the legitimacy of the right-moment standard while omitting any direct declaration that would amount to immediate commitment.", "Lila": "Lila should openly state that Ethan's explicit standard for the right moment is the issue and directly ask whether ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange as requiring partial acknowledgment of Lila's challenge and a middle-ground defense of conditional action rather than accepting Lila's push for immediate action outright.", "Lila": "Lila should frame the dispute as a shared clarification problem by directly testing Ethan's ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's interruptions, reframing, fixed gaze, or posture shifts toward the board and respond by tightening or softening his wording to preserve the standard without appearing inconsistent or evasive.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ethan's hesitation, qualification, gaze withdrawal, or r... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila reach an exchange in which Ethan verbally concedes part of Lila's challenge while explicitly keeping the right-moment standard in place, and Lila's narrowed follow-up and continued attention show that Ethan's position remains contestable but not dismissible as absent or wholly unclear.", "Lila... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila is directly challenging whether his stated standard for the right moment is justified in this conversation, and his choice to make his answer explicit has made his position open to scrutiny beyond the original physics topic.", "desire": "To preserve the legitimacy of his standard while keepin... | images/scenario_019/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_019/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_34 | scenario_020 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Lena | Beside a lab worktable crowded with tools and documents, Ethan and Lena confer about which items can be moved so the surface can be used for an immediate interaction without disrupting the lab's professional order. Their brief coordination at the bench centers on creating a temporary, mutually acceptable arrangement wi... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lena": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Avoiding", "Lena": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Research Scientist"}, "Lena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Lab Technician"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state plainly which items Ethan believes can be moved for a brief use of the table and explicitly mark the change as temporary and orderly.", "Lena": "Lena must keep Lena's stance partly indirect by selectively naming which items should remain undisturbed while leaving some preferences unstated un... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a low-friction alignment by proposing only minimal item movement and avoiding broad claims about reorganizing the bench.", "Lena": "Lena must seek a quick middle-ground arrangement by identifying some materials to keep in place and some to set aside temporarily so the interaction can procee... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Lena for hesitation, interruption, gaze checks toward specific tools or documents, and posture tightening, then reduce proposal scope, pause, or restate the adjustment as limited and practical.", "Lena": "Lena must monitor Ethan for agreement, hesitation, reframing, gaze toward crowded areas... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena explicitly agree in dialogue on a small set of items to set aside temporarily and a larger set to leave untouched, with Ethan's plain wording, narrowed proposals, and responses to Lena's hesitation producing an observable, orderly clearing of usable table space.", "Lena": "Lena and Ethan reach... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The worktable is too crowded for their immediate interaction unless some items are selectively moved, and Lena is coordinating with him about what can be cleared.", "desire": "To establish a mutually acceptable way to use the table briefly without disrupting the professional order of the lab.", "i... | images/scenario_020/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_020/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_35 | scenario_021 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, Elena presses for an immediate decision about the evening and makes clear that she wants Ben to remain there with her rather than move on to other plans. Ben agrees, and as the shared space is cleared for their use, the exchange settles into a mutually recognized shift from practical coordination to... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Avoiding"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must verbally confirm staying with Elena while using selective wording that presents the decision as settled and coordinated without revealing any competing inclination toward other plans.", "Elena": "Elena must state plainly that Ben staying with Elena in the room is the intended evening plan and avoid in... | {"Ben": "Ben must position the exchange as a joint practical agreement by integrating Elena's proposal with visible coordination around clearing and using the room so the shared plan appears mutually accepted.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue Ben's clear commitment while minimizing extended dispute by pressing for a yes-o... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, posture shifts, gaze, and tension cues, and if Elena shows uncertainty or presses harder, Ben must increase explicit confirmations and practical coordination language while reducing ambiguous phrasing.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptio... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena establish a mutually accepted outcome in which Ben's confirmation and practical coordination around clearing the room are recognized by both as settling the evening plan to remain there together, with no competing plan left active in their dialogue or behavior.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach an ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants a clear decision to stay together in the room, and the shared area needs to be made usable for that choice to hold.", "desire": "To align with Elena's proposal while maintaining a workable shared setting that supports remaining there together.", "intention": "To confirm the shared plan t... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_36 | scenario_021 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the shared room, Elena pushes for an immediate decision about the evening by asking Ben to stay with her there, and Ben makes clear that he will. As the table is cleared of items left in the common area, the interaction moves from deciding whether to remain together into confirming a more exclusive focus on each oth... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "graphic designer"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must honestly state that Ben will stay and align the message with observable action such as clearing the common area so Elena can verify commitment through both words and behavior.", "Elena": "Elena must exaggerate the immediacy and obviousness of staying together in the shared room through direct wording,... | {"Ben": "Ben must manage the interaction with an avoiding orientation by reducing uncertainty and potential friction through concise agreement and practical organizing rather than extended negotiation about the decision.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue agreement by accommodating Ben's response space while still framing s... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial tension, posture shifts, and gaze direction, then respond by clarifying commitment more explicitly if signals show doubt or by keeping the exchange brief and task-focused if signals show acceptance.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's agre... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena establish an observable shared outcome in which Ben's clear statement that Ben will stay is confirmed by Elena's accepting response and by both participants clearing the common area in a way that shifts the interaction from deciding into jointly focusing the evening on each other in that room.", ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena wants a clear answer about whether he will stay, and the shared space needs to be made usable if they are to remain there together.", "desire": "To confirm his willingness to stay while showing that he is aligned with Elena about continuing the evening in that space.", "intention": "To signal ... | images/scenario_021/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_021/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_37 | scenario_022 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Ethan; Benjamin; Miles | In the apartment's kitchen-living area, Benjamin insists the boundary crossing was only a drunken mistake and that nothing beyond it occurred, trying to narrow how the situation is understood. Ethan directly challenges both Benjamin and Miles over what was kept from him, pushing for open acknowledgment of the breach be... | {"Benjamin": "Proponent", "Ethan": "Respondent", "Miles": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Miles": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Benjamin": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Miles": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "corporate employee"}, "Mil... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Surprise", "Miles": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan displays visible shock upon learning that Benjamin kissed Ethan's mom.", "Miles": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Miles at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must keep statements narrowly focused on the incident as a one-time drunken mistake and remain indirect about any broader implications so that suspicion of something more serious is not fed.", "Ethan": "Ethan must amplify the significance of what was concealed and the breach of trust in direct st... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must offer a limited account that concedes the boundary crossing but repeatedly positions the matter as isolated in order to contain judgment and preserve standing within the group.", "Ethan": "Ethan must press Benjamin and Miles for a shared, explicit account of what happened while framing ackno... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must monitor Ethan's interruptions, challenges, fixed gaze, posture shifts, and tension cues, and respond by shortening claims, lowering the scope of his framing, or repeating the isolated-incident formulation when escalation increases.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for hesitation, interruption, r... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin secures an interactional outcome in which Ethan's challenge results in Benjamin's account being accepted only as a one-time drunken mistake with nothing further claimed by Miles, evidenced through Benjamin's repeated narrow wording, Miles's non-expansive responses, and Ethan's eventual turn towar... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "Ethan sees his conduct as crossing a family boundary and suspects that Benjamin is concealing something more serious.", "desire": "To limit the interpretation of the incident to a one-time drunken mistake and prevent it from being treated as a larger betrayal.", "intention": "To frame the event... | images/scenario_022/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_01.jpg", "Miles": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_38 | scenario_022 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Ethan; Benjamin; Miles | In the apartment's kitchen-living area, Benjamin frames the matter as a one-time drunken mistake and insists nothing further happened, while Ethan openly rejects that account and demands clarity from both Benjamin and Miles about what was concealed regarding the family boundary. The exchange becomes a direct dispute ov... | {"Benjamin": "Proponent", "Ethan": "Respondent", "Miles": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Deception", "Miles": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Benjamin": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Miles": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "corporate employee"}, "Mi... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Surprise", "Miles": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan displays visible shock upon learning that Benjamin, not Paolo, kissed his mom.", "Miles": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Miles at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must use honest signaling to state consistently that the incident was a one-time drunken mistake and that nothing further happened, without altering the scope of Benjamin's account.", "Ethan": "Ethan must use deceptive questioning and selective disclosure to press Benjamin and Miles for inconsist... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must pursue a compromising stance by defending the narrow account while offering enough direct explanation to reduce Ethan's interpretation of a broader boundary violation.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a compromising stance by demanding direct clarification from Benjamin and Miles while signalin... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin must track Ethan's rejection, reframing, movement toward the exit, facial tightening, and interruption patterns, then shorten, restate, or clarify Benjamin's account to keep the dispute from broadening.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Benjamin's and Miles's denials, hesitations, interruptions, gaz... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin secures an observable interaction state in which Benjamin's repeated narrow account of a one-time drunken mistake is also affirmed or at least not expanded by Miles under Ethan's direct challenges, while Ethan's continued rejection and movement toward the exit show that the dispute has been conta... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "His conduct is being judged as a breach of an important family boundary, and Ethan may treat the incident as more serious than Benjamin's limited explanation allows.", "desire": "To have the incident understood as a single drunken mistake with no further implications.", "intention": "To maintai... | images/scenario_022/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_01.jpg", "Miles": "images/scenario_022/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_39 | scenario_023 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Eleanor Vance; Daniel Reed; Benjamin Carter | Near one apartment entrance, Eleanor Vance briefly checks on Daniel Reed, and he gives a concise reply suited to the passing hallway exchange before she continues down the corridor. As she moves on, Benjamin Carter, standing nearby, acknowledges her with a polite greeting that keeps the interaction within the building'... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Auxiliary", "Daniel Reed": "Answerer", "Eleanor Vance": "Questioner"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Strategic Withholding", "Daniel Reed": "Suppression", "Eleanor Vance": "Deception"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Accommodating", "Daniel Reed": "Compromising", "Eleanor Vance": "Compromising"} | {"Benjamin Carter": {"age": "middle-aged", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Daniel Reed": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office wo... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Neutral", "Daniel Reed": "Neutral", "Eleanor Vance": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel Reed": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Eleanor Vance": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should use strategic withholding by offering only a minimal greeting that acknowledges Eleanor Vance without adding personal information or invitations to continue.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should suppress extra detail by giving a short, socially acceptable reply that answers E... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should prioritize hallway harmony by accommodating the passing routine and keeping recognition polite, brief, and non-intrusive.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should balance courtesy and boundary-setting by offering just enough response to satisfy Eleanor Vance while closing the int... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should track Eleanor Vance's pace, eye contact, facial changes, and any verbal extension or hesitation, and Benjamin Carter should adjust greeting timing, volume, and brevity to either allow passage or lightly reciprocate without prolonging contact.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed sho... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter's courteous greeting to Eleanor Vance, arriving after Eleanor Vance's brief exchange with Daniel Reed, is acknowledged without stopping Eleanor Vance's movement, resulting in a mutually recognized but non-extended hallway contact among the neighbors.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed's ... | {"Benjamin Carter": {"belief": "Eleanor is moving past after a brief exchange with Daniel, and a minimal greeting fits the corridor's passing social contact.", "desire": "To acknowledge Eleanor politely without drawing the interaction into a longer exchange.", "intention": "To offer a courteous greeting that marks reco... | images/scenario_023/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin Carter": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel Reed": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_02.jpg", "Eleanor Vance": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_40 | scenario_023 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Eleanor Vance; Daniel Reed; Benjamin Carter | Near one apartment entrance, Eleanor Vance briefly checks on Daniel Reed, and he gives a concise reply that keeps the exchange limited to the hallway moment. As Eleanor continues down the corridor, Benjamin Carter, standing a short distance away, acknowledges her with a polite greeting that maintains the casual civilit... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Auxiliary", "Daniel Reed": "Answerer", "Eleanor Vance": "Questioner"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Honest Signaling", "Daniel Reed": "Deception", "Eleanor Vance": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "Accommodating", "Daniel Reed": "Accommodating", "Eleanor Vance": "Compromising"} | {"Benjamin Carter": {"age": "middle-aged", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Daniel Reed": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Neutral", "Daniel Reed": "Neutral", "Eleanor Vance": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Benjamin Carter at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Daniel Reed": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel Reed at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Eleanor Vance": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Eleanor Vance at the beginn... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should offer a clear simple greeting that honestly signals recognition and civility without implying a wish to interrupt or lengthen the corridor encounter.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should give a concise courteous reply that presents sufficient closure while concealing any open... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should accommodate the ongoing flow by acknowledging Eleanor Vance briefly and leaving conversational space for her movement down the corridor.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should accommodate Eleanor Vance's check-in by answering politely yet steer the exchange toward immediate com... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter should track Eleanor Vance's walking pace, gaze direction, and any verbal acknowledgment or lack of it, then adjust greeting timing, volume, or brevity to match her availability and avoid obstructing the shared hallway rhythm.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed should monitor Eleanor Van... | {"Benjamin Carter": "Benjamin Carter's brief greeting is acknowledged by Eleanor Vance as Eleanor Vance moves on after Daniel Reed's short answer, resulting in a shared corridor moment where mutual recognition is established without interrupting the limited flow of the interaction.", "Daniel Reed": "Daniel Reed's conci... | {"Benjamin Carter": {"belief": "Eleanor is passing by after a short exchange with Daniel, and a simple greeting fits the shared hallway setting.", "desire": "To acknowledge Eleanor in a polite way that maintains mutual civility among neighbors.", "intention": "To offer a brief greeting that marks recognition without in... | images/scenario_023/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin Carter": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_03.jpg", "Daniel Reed": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_02.jpg", "Eleanor Vance": "images/scenario_023/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_41 | scenario_024 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | At the entry area of the home, Elena accepts from Ben a dish he has brought along with some books and a message from someone absent. While organizing what has arrived for the gathering, she asks whether the dish is vegetarian so she can determine if it will be suitable for Susan. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Strategic Withholding", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "professor"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "homemaker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer Elena with only the dish details necessary to determine vegetarian status while omitting unrelated explanation unless Elena asks for more.", "Elena": "Elena must ask Ben directly whether the dish is vegetarian and state that the answer is needed to place it appropriately for Susan without softe... | {"Ben": "Ben must prioritize Elena's hosting need by framing the reply to help Elena sort the dish for Susan with minimal insistence on his own contribution being highlighted.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a quick mutually workable clarification by linking Ben's answer to the gathering's food arrangement rather than ch... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, eye focus on the dish, and organizing movements and then add clarification or stop at the minimum needed detail to support Elena's decision.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for Ben's direct answer, hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or handling pauses... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena reach an explicitly shared classification of the delivered dish as suitable or not suitable for Susan, evidenced by Ben's minimally sufficient verbal confirmation and Elena's acceptance of that answer in how Elena organizes the item.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben reach an explicitly shared classifica... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena is using his delivery information to determine whether the dish fits Susan's dietary needs for the gathering.", "desire": "To have the delivered dish correctly understood in relation to Susan's expected meal suitability.", "intention": "To provide only the relevant information about the dish's... | images/scenario_024/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_024/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_42 | scenario_025 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Mason | In the apartment's open kitchen and dining area, Ethan argues that Mason should cover the replacement because the table damage followed Mason's involvement there earlier that morning. Mason resists by invoking an informal ownership rule, and the dispute focuses on getting the other to accept a specific standard for who... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Mason": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Suppression", "Mason": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Mason": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Mason": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Mason": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mason": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Mason at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should present the sequence-of-events basis for Mason's responsibility while keeping broader judgments about household accountability indirect or unstated to avoid exposing the full stakes of the dispute.", "Mason": "Mason should state plainly that the informal ownership rule does not make Mason automa... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should frame the argument as a joint effort to settle a fair household standard while persistently steering the discussion toward recognition that Mason is liable for the replacement cost.", "Mason": "Mason should position the dispute as a shared interpretation problem by inviting comparison between th... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Mason's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, gaze shifts, posture changes, and tension cues, then adjust pacing and specificity by clarifying the event sequence when Mason opens space and narrowing the claim when Mason resists.", "Mason": "Mason should track Ethan's agreemen... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Mason explicitly establish through back-and-forth comparison of the morning event sequence and the informal ownership rule whether Mason accepts or rejects liability for replacing the table, with Ethan's clarifications and narrowed claims producing a mutually recognizable standard stated in dialogu... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ethan believes the table damage is connected to Mason's involvement earlier that morning and that this makes Mason responsible for the replacement cost.", "desire": "Ethan wants shared recognition that Mason is liable for replacing the damaged table.", "intention": "Ethan intends to argue from the... | images/scenario_025/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mason": "images/scenario_025/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_43 | scenario_026 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ben; Ethan | Near the kitchen area of their shared apartment, Ben and Ethan discuss whether jointly buying a household item would be a fair and practical arrangement for both of them. As they talk during an ordinary domestic moment, they compare the idea to past roommate situations to clarify the risks, responsibilities, and whethe... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must state openly how past roommate examples inform Ben's view of fairness, payment, and shared responsibility so Ben's position on a manageable joint obligation is explicit.", "Ethan": "Ethan must amplify the practical downsides of shared ownership and cost-splitting through stronger examples and emphasis... | {"Ben": "Ben must frame the discussion as a joint problem-solving effort by inviting comparison of both roommates' expectations and proposing terms that are workable for both sides.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a collaborative standard for the decision by pressing for explicit justification of responsibilities and sha... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture tension, then slow down, clarify examples, or restate the fairness criteria to keep mutual understanding aligned.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Ben's agreement, reframing, hesitation, facial tightening, and gaze direction, the... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan reach an explicitly stated shared position, supported by Ben's direct fairness criteria and Ethan's responses to past roommate comparisons, on whether splitting the cost would create a clear and manageable household obligation.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Ben establish through stated comparisons, clari... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the current discussion is about whether a joint purchase is practical and fair for both roommates, and that previous roommate situations are relevant for judging shared responsibility.", "desire": "Ben wants a clear mutual understanding about whether splitting the cost creates a managea... | images/scenario_026/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_026/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_026/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_44 | scenario_027 | low | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Benjamin; Marcus; Lila | In the lounge area near the center of the café, the group focuses on what Lila should do next as they weigh honesty against loyalty in a difficult situation involving someone absent. Their discussion centers on whether Lila should tell the woman directly, with some arguing that speaking up is necessary and others stres... | {"Benjamin": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Marcus": "Auxiliary"} | {"Benjamin": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Deception", "Marcus": "Suppression"} | {"Benjamin": "Avoiding", "Ethan": "Avoiding", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Marcus": "Accommodating"} | {"Benjamin": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Lila": {"age": "... | {"Benjamin": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Marcus": "Neutral"} | {"Benjamin": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Marcus": "No clear facial affect cues are available ... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin should amplify the seriousness of leaving the woman uninformed so Benjamin's dialogue makes direct truth-telling sound clearly justified despite relationship costs.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state caution about direct disclosure in qualified and indirect wording while withholding any stronger pers... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin should advance Benjamin's case without fully entering a prolonged clash by repeatedly centering the discussion on the necessity of informing the woman while limiting side disputes about blame.", "Ethan": "Ethan should position Ethan's contribution as minimizing escalation by steering the discussi... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin should monitor for agreement, reframing, hesitation, or skeptical facial tension and, if resistance rises, shift from forceful claims to concise examples or slower emphasis while keeping the option of direct disclosure salient.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for interruptions, hesitant replies, t... | {"Benjamin": "Benjamin should help produce a group discussion outcome in which the need to inform the woman directly is stated by Benjamin, engaged by Ethan or Marcus, and recognized by Lila as a justified option despite explicit mention of possible friendship costs.", "Ethan": "Ethan should help produce a group discus... | {"Benjamin": {"belief": "He believes the group is evaluating honesty versus loyalty and that the choice to tell the woman directly has serious social consequences for the friendship involved.", "desire": "He wants the group to treat direct truth-telling as a justified option and to recognize the importance of informing... | images/scenario_027/group_labeled.png | {"Benjamin": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_04.jpg", "Marcus": "images/scenario_027/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_45 | scenario_028 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Liam | In the showroom's cluster of themed dining tables, Ethan and Liam focus their discussion on whether bird motifs or ladybugs better suit the meal setting they are trying to choose. Their disagreement centers on reaching a table selection they can both accept while each maintains a role in the decision. | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Liam": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Liam": "Accommodating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "unspecified"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Liam at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should keep discussion content limited to comparisons between bird motifs and ladybug motifs while withholding any final preference or bottom line until a jointly workable option is signaled.", "Liam": "Liam should state only a minimal stance on which motif fits the meal setting and suppress strong com... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should position the exchange as a mutual tradeoff process by proposing partial concessions on the two motif options so Ethan retains visible influence over the final selection.", "Liam": "Liam should strategically prioritize coordination by endorsing overlap in Ethan's points and yielding on less centr... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should monitor Liam for agreement, hesitation, interruption, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and respond by slowing commitment, narrowing the frame back to the two motifs, or softening proposal strength to preserve joint acceptability.", "Liam": "Liam should watch Ethan for reframing, hesitation, in... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam explicitly settle on either the bird-motif table or the ladybug-motif table as a mutually acceptable choice after Ethan keeps the comparison confined to those two options, with both participants verbally acknowledging the selection and Ethan's influence remaining visible in the wording of the ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "The current decision is between dining tables with bird motifs and tables with ladybug motifs, and Liam holds a different view about which option better suits the intended meal setting.", "desire": "To reach a table choice that can be jointly accepted without giving up influence over the decision.... | images/scenario_028/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_028/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_46 | scenario_029 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan Carter; Robert Miller | Near the doorway off the main living area, Ethan Carter confronts Robert Miller over the secret relationship and insists that by the next day Robert Miller must either end things with Ronni or tell Ethan Carter's mother the truth. In the tight space beside household storage, Ethan Carter pushes for a clear commitment a... | {"Ethan Carter": "Proponent", "Robert Miller": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Honest Signaling", "Robert Miller": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan Carter": "Collaborating", "Robert Miller": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan Carter": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "college student"}, "Robert Miller": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "small business owner... | {"Ethan Carter": "Neutral", "Robert Miller": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan Carter": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Robert Miller": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must state the two options and the next-day deadline directly, without softening or obscuring the household openness issue or the nighttime boundary.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must answer Ethan Carter's demand with a direct statement tied to one of the two options and avoid vague ... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must position the exchange as a problem requiring a clear shared resolution by securing Robert Miller's explicit commitment to one of the two options before ending the discussion.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must pursue a workable middle path by acknowledging Ethan Carter's deadline... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter must watch for Robert Miller's hesitation, interruption, gaze avoidance, or posture tightening and respond by restating the deadline, narrowing back to the two options, and enforcing the instruction to leave the area if deflection continues.", "Robert Miller": "Robert Miller must monitor ... | {"Ethan Carter": "Ethan Carter obtains from Robert Miller a direct verbal commitment to either end the relationship with Ronni or tell Ethan Carter's mother by the next day, and the exchange closes with Robert Miller ceasing argument and leaving the area when Ethan Carter reinforces the nighttime boundary.", "Robert Mi... | {"Ethan Carter": {"belief": "Robert Miller is maintaining a secret relationship with Ronni, and the issue must be resolved by either ending the affair or disclosing it to Ethan Carter's mother by the next day.", "desire": "To establish a clear and immediate commitment from Robert Miller that addresses the secret relati... | images/scenario_029/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan Carter": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_01.jpg", "Robert Miller": "images/scenario_029/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_47 | scenario_030 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | Late at night in their shared student space, Ethan and Ryan continue a quiet conversation about whether Ryan's pattern of seeing many women fits with being a dependable long-term partner. Ryan openly raises the question of what commitment he can realistically sustain, while Ethan stays engaged with candid, lightly humo... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Avoiding", "Ryan": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Ryan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ryan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state candidly whether Ryan's current dating pattern appears compatible with dependable long-term commitment and explicitly keep the discussion tied to a realistic next step.", "Ryan": "Ryan must openly describe his current pattern of seeing many women and his doubts about long-term dependability ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must maintain an avoiding stance by keeping responses low-intensity, lightly humorous, and focused on testing Ryan's consistency without escalating the exchange into a confrontational verdict.", "Ryan": "Ryan must take a collaborating stance by treating the issue as a joint reality-check with Ethan and... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ryan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and then adjust by pausing, simplifying the point, or restating the question more directly to keep the conversation concrete.", "Ryan": "Ryan must track Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruptions... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan jointly bring the conversation to a concrete verbal conclusion that Ryan's current pattern does not support a dependable long-term partner position without a change in habits, with Ethan's candid low-intensity prompting and Ryan's explicit acknowledgment aligning in dialogue, pauses, and obser... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is openly questioning whether his pattern of seeing many women fits with being a dependable long-term partner, and the conversation is moving toward deciding what relationship approach is realistic.", "desire": "To clarify Ryan's thinking about what level of commitment is actually sustainable... | images/scenario_030/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_48 | scenario_030 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Ryan | Late at night in their shared student space, the two speak quietly from their sleeping spots as Ryan directs the conversation toward whether his habit of seeing many women fits with being a dependable long-term partner. Ethan stays engaged nearby, answering frankly with some humor so the discussion can clarify what kin... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Ryan": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Deception"} | {"Ethan": "Accommodating", "Ryan": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Ryan": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ryan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state direct assessments of Ryan's dating pattern and commitment fit, using light humor without masking Ethan's actual judgment so the discussion does not stay vague or misleading.", "Ryan": "Ryan must present his dating history and commitment doubts selectively to test credibility while avoiding ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must accommodate Ryan's lead in topic choice while still keeping replies candid and centered on what commitment Ryan can realistically sustain.", "Ryan": "Ryan must pursue a compromise position by framing a level of commitment that sounds socially acceptable yet does not require claims Ethan can easily... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ryan's hesitation, reframing, interruptions, gaze shifts, or tension cues and respond by softening timing with humor or sharpening questions to restore clarity and usefulness.", "Ryan": "Ryan must monitor Ethan's direct agreement, skeptical reframing, pauses, facial changes, and posture ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Ryan reach an explicitly stated, mutually recognized description of the level of relationship commitment Ryan can realistically maintain, with Ethan's direct humorous replies and Ryan's confirming responses making the conclusion clear in the dialogue and visible in their timing and gaze.", "Ryan": ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Ryan is using the late-night conversation to examine whether his current dating pattern is compatible with being a reliable long-term partner.", "desire": "To help the discussion reach a clear and workable view of what kind of relationship commitment Ryan can realistically sustain.", "intention": ... | images/scenario_030/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_01.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_030/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_49 | scenario_031 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In a quiet corner of the lounge, Ethan presses Ben to accept a reassuring view of marriage by comparing it to Ben's earlier career decision, presenting commitment as something that can resist outside pressure. Ben engages without fully conceding, keeping the exchange workable as Ethan maintains a teasingly persuasive t... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must use suppression by responding selectively to Ethan's analogy, keeping Ben's full stance on marriage indirect while still offering enough verbal engagement to keep the exchange workable.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state the analogy between Ben's earlier career decision and marriage directly, using a teasin... | {"Ben": "Ben must maintain a compromising stance by conceding limited points in Ethan's reasoning while reserving Ben's authority over how commitment decisions are defined.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a collaborating stance by presenting the comparison as a shared reasoning problem and inviting Ben to acknowledge com... | {"Ben": "Ben must track Ethan's teasing emphasis, reframing, eye contact, and conversational pressure, then answer briefly and smooth the exchange when Ethan intensifies, or offer partial acknowledgment when Ethan's tone softens.", "Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture t... | {"Ben": "Ben and Ethan sustain a socially smooth exchange in which Ben openly grants a limited point in Ethan's analogy between marriage and Ben's earlier career decision while preserving Ben's authority over the final definition of commitment, and this outcome is supported by Ben's brief partial acknowledgments, Ethan... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is urging him to treat marriage as comparable to a past career choice and is testing whether Ben will accept that reasoning in front of an intimate conversational partner.", "desire": "Ben wants to preserve a workable understanding with Ethan without fully yielding control over how his commitm... | images/scenario_031/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_50 | scenario_031 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Ben | In a quiet corner of the lounge, Ethan pushes Ben to accept a reassuring comparison between marriage and an earlier career choice, presenting commitment as something Ben can decide for himself rather than a capitulation to outside pressure. Ben stays engaged without fully surrendering his own framing, and their pointed... | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Ethan": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must answer Ethan with amplified phrasing or playful emphasis that keeps Ben engaged with the comparison while avoiding any clear full acceptance of Ethan's framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state the career-marriage comparison plainly and present commitment as Ben's own choice without masking or overstating... | {"Ben": "Ben must maintain a compromise position by partially validating Ethan's reassurance yet preserving Ben's own interpretive control over commitment in the exchange.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue acceptance of the analogy by pressing the shared middle ground between reassurance and autonomy while using teasing fa... | {"Ben": "Ben must track Ethan's insistence, teasing, pauses, facial shifts, gaze, and body movement and respond by matching banter, delaying concession, or reframing more strongly when Ethan presses too hard and easing the pushback when Ethan softens.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Ben's agreement, hesitation, interr... | {"Ben": "Ben reaches an outcome where Ethan's comparison remains in play without Ben granting full interpretive control, shown through Ben's amplified but responsive replies, Ethan's continued teasing instead of harder pressure, and their shared physical joke closing the exchange without a clear concession.", "Ethan": ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ethan is trying to reassure him by framing marriage through the lens of an earlier career decision and expects him to acknowledge that comparison.", "desire": "To respond without yielding too much interpretive control over his own views on commitment.", "intention": "To engage with Ethan's argument ... | images/scenario_031/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_031/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_51 | scenario_032 | low | Persuasion | 3 | Elena; Lila; Mia | In the coffeehouse seating area, Elena and Lila argue that Mia should not treat Valentine's Day as sufficient reason to reconsider a date invitation from a man she had already rejected. The discussion stays focused on whether his earlier behavior should still determine Mia's answer and on whether changing course now wo... | {"Elena": "Proponent", "Lila": "Auxiliary", "Mia": "Respondent"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Exaggeration"} | {"Elena": "Compromising", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Mia": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lila": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "fashion assistant"}, "Mia": {"age":... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena must overstate how strongly Valentine's Day alone fails as a reason to reverse the earlier rejection so Elena's dialogue clearly centers the man's prior conduct as the deciding standard.", "Lila": "Lila must state plainly and without hedging that a calendar occasion is not a sufficient basis to undo a ... | {"Elena": "Elena must pursue a middle-ground stance by pressing Mia to keep the earlier rejection meaningful while framing the position as practical support rather than a total shutdown of discussion.", "Lila": "Lila must support Elena's position in a relationship-preserving way by agreeing with the standard being prop... | {"Elena": "Elena must watch for Mia's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and then soften or sharpen wording to keep focus on prior conduct without letting the holiday become the main frame.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor agreement, reframing, facial tension, and gaze withdrawal from Mia or Elen... | {"Elena": "Elena secures a spoken exchange in which Elena and Lila both state that Valentine's Day alone is not an adequate reason to reverse Mia's earlier rejection and Mia responds by treating the man's prior conduct as the main standard under discussion.", "Lila": "Lila helps produce a clear group statement in which... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Mia is reconsidering a date invitation from a man she had already rejected, and the approach of Valentine's Day is being treated as a reason to revise that decision despite his earlier behavior.", "desire": "Mia to evaluate the invitation based on the man's prior conduct rather than on the holiday... | images/scenario_032/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_032/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_52 | scenario_033 | low | Deliberation | 3 | Lila; Clara; Sophie | In the kitchen-dining area, the three women continue preparing the meal while discussing what kind of cleansing ritual to hold the next night before Valentine’s Day. As they compare playful and practical options, the conversation moves toward a shared agreement that burning old gifts and keepsakes from former boyfriend... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding", "Sophie": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Lila": "Accommodating", "Sophie": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}, "Sophie": {"age"... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should state plainly and directly that burning old gifts and keepsakes is the clearest ritual choice so Clara makes the decision explicit rather than leaving it implied.", "Lila": "Lila should selectively voice support for burning old gifts and keepsakes while withholding any lingering preference for a... | {"Clara": "Clara should accommodate the group by presenting the ritual choice as a practical shared resolution that invites acceptance instead of centering Clara's own authority.", "Lila": "Lila should accommodate the discussion by reinforcing whichever wording helps everyone accept the ritual choice instead of pushing... | {"Clara": "Clara should track agreement, reframing, pauses, and visible tension such as narrowed gaze or posture shifts from Lila and Sophie and adjust by clarifying more firmly when signals are receptive or by restating more gently when signals are hesitant.", "Lila": "Lila should watch for hesitation, interruptions, ... | {"Clara": "Clara secures an observable group decision with Lila and Sophie that burning old gifts and keepsakes is the concrete ritual for the next night, evidenced by Clara stating the choice plainly, Lila endorsing the same wording, and Sophie framing it as acceptable from both playful and practical angles.", "Lila":... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The discussion is comparing playful and practical ritual options, and the group needs a clear choice for how to mark the occasion.", "desire": "To make the group's decision explicit and settled on a concrete ritual for the next night.", "intention": "To state her position clearly in favor of the o... | images/scenario_033/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_033/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_53 | scenario_034 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Daniel | During dinner at the quiet restaurant, Elena disputes Daniel's claim that her remark caused the problem and rejects his account of what was said. With the missing guest and absent coat making the failed date apparent, their exchange centers on which version of events the table will accept and whether responsibility res... | {"Daniel": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Deception"} | {"Daniel": "Compromising", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Business Executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Marketing Manager"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel must state his version of what was said plainly and consistently so the table can trace the failed date to Elena's remark rather than to Daniel's conduct.", "Elena": "Elena must present a selective account that casts Daniel's behavior as the decisive factor while steering listeners away from treating... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must seek a quick middle-ground acceptance of his account by pressing that Elena's words were a credible cause while limiting escalation that could make Daniel appear primarily responsible.", "Elena": "Elena must position the dispute as a joint fact-checking problem by challenging Daniel's version an... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, facial tightening, posture shifts, or averted gaze from Elena and the table and then soften, clarify, or restate his claim to preserve support without appearing to force the conclusion.", "Elena": "Elena must watch for agreement, hesitation... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena reach a table-visible dispute state in which Daniel's consistent account, Elena's contested responses, and both participants' wording and behavioral cues leave Elena's remark as a credible explanation so the accepted account does not settle on Daniel as the primary cause of the failed date.... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "The missing guest's absence confirms that the date has failed, and Elena's remark is a credible explanation that others at the table may accept or reject.", "desire": "To establish a shared understanding that he is not the primary cause of the failed date.", "intention": "To maintain his accusati... | images/scenario_034/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_54 | scenario_034 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Daniel | During the restaurant meal, Elena disputes Daniel’s claim that her remark caused the failed date, arguing that his account of the supposed insult is inaccurate. With the missing guest and absent coat now central to the discussion, their exchange becomes a pointed dispute over whether Elena’s words or Daniel’s own behav... | {"Daniel": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Daniel": "Compromising", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Business Executive"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Marketing Manager"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel should openly state that Daniel sees Elena’s remark as a central cause of the failed date and directly describe how the missing guest and absent coat support Daniel’s account.", "Elena": "Elena should state that Daniel’s quoted insult account is inaccurate while selectively omitting any broader comme... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should use a compromising stance by pressing for acknowledgment that Elena’s words contributed to the outcome while allowing that Daniel’s conduct can also be discussed.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a compromising stance by narrowing the dispute to whether Daniel’s accusation is accurate and by pr... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should monitor Elena’s agreement, hesitation, contradiction, gaze shifts, facial tightening, or posture changes and then adjust timing, specificity, and framing so Daniel keeps the accusation centered on Elena’s remark without letting responsibility move entirely onto Daniel.", "Elena": "Elena should... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena reach an explicit exchange in which Daniel gets Elena to acknowledge that Elena’s remark can be discussed as a contributing factor in the failed date while Daniel’s conduct also remains part of the responsibility dispute.", "Elena": "Elena and Daniel reach an explicit exchange in which Elen... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "The missing guest and absent coat indicate the date has failed, and Elena’s remark is a central reason for that outcome, even as she disputes his account.", "desire": "To secure acknowledgment that Elena’s words contributed to the failed date rather than allowing responsibility to shift entirely ... | images/scenario_034/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_034/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_55 | scenario_035 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lena | At one side of the table, Ethan and Lena speak in a more private register as the meal continues around them. Their joking about the awkward dinner gives way to Ethan arguing that they should revisit their past relationship, while Lena answers affectionately but makes clear she is not agreeing to renew it. | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lena": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "lawyer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must present the discussion as a mutual exploration while masking how strongly Ethan is pushing for renewal, using selective phrasing that makes closure sound premature without stating Ethan's full urgency.", "Lena": "Lena must signal warmth and regard while withholding any statements that could be quo... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must strategically position reconciliation as a shared problem to work through together, persistently steering the exchange toward openness rather than accepting Lena's boundary as final.", "Lena": "Lena must collaborate by recognizing Ethan's perspective while firmly defining the outcome Ethan cannot ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must monitor Lena's wording for refusal or softening and watch for gaze withdrawal, tightened posture, or interruptions, then reduce direct pressure or reframe the topic as reflection when resistance becomes more visible.", "Lena": "Lena must track whether Ethan reframes, persists after refusal, or spe... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena reach an exchange in which Ethan's dialogue keeps the possibility of future discussion verbally present while Lena's replies and observable restraint prevent any mutual statement that the relationship is being renewed or conclusively reopened.", "Lena": "Lena and Ethan reach a clear conversati... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the conversation has shifted from joking to a direct discussion about whether he and Lena might resume their relationship, and that the dinner setting gives him an opening to argue for that outcome.", "desire": "He wants Lena to accept the possibility of renewing their relationship or ... | images/scenario_035/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_56 | scenario_035 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lena | As the group dinner continues at the grill table, Ethan turns the joking about the awkward meal into a case that renewing the relationship should still be considered. Lena responds in a caring but controlled way that keeps the exchange cordial while making clear she does not accept reconciliation. | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lena": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Lena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lena": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "lawyer"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must present reconciliation as a practical and mutually reasonable option while concealing how strongly Ethan is pushing for personal acceptance by softening claims and selectively phrasing Lena's prior warmth as possible openness.", "Lena": "Lena must omit any statements that could be read as openness... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a middle-ground case that asks Lena to treat reconciliation as worth considering rather than demanding commitment, so Ethan can advance Ethan's position without appearing to ignore Lena's stated boundary.", "Lena": "Lena must sustain a cordial middle-ground stance by acknowledging shared hi... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lena's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, tightened posture, reduced gaze, or facial restraint and then lower intensity, delay further claims, or recast Ethan's point as only asking for consideration when those signals indicate resistance.", "Lena": "Lena must monitor Ethan'... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lena reach an observable exchange in which Ethan gets Lena to explicitly address reconciliation as a topic worth rejecting rather than dismissing outright, while Lena's words, restrained delivery, and boundary-setting cues show that resuming the relationship is not accepted.", "Lena": "Lena and Eth... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the conversation has shifted from joking about the awkward dinner to a real opportunity to argue for renewing the relationship, and that Lena's affectionate response leaves room to keep pressing his position.", "desire": "He wants Lena to accept the possibility of resuming the relation... | images/scenario_035/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_035/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_57 | scenario_036 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Sophie; Mark | At the work gathering, Sophie and Mark sit close together among colleagues and keep their conversation quiet as the event continues around them. Sophie presses for a clear answer on a sensitive request, while Mark resists giving full commitment and offers only a limited, awkward reply in an effort to preserve the inter... | {"Mark": "Respondent", "Sophie": "Proponent"} | {"Mark": "Strategic Withholding", "Sophie": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Mark": "Compromising", "Sophie": "Collaborating"} | {"Mark": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office professional"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office ... | {"Mark": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Mark": "Mark must give a brief, qualified reply that strategically withholds full commitment or disclosure while showing enough responsiveness in words and demeanor to keep the conversation workable.", "Sophie": "Sophie must ask for a direct answer in a low voice while strategically withholding any broader implicatio... | {"Mark": "Mark must pursue a compromise position by offering partial acknowledgment or a limited condition that reduces Sophie's pressure without fully accepting Sophie's request.", "Sophie": "Sophie must position the conversation as a joint need for clear coordination by persistently narrowing Mark's limited reply tow... | {"Mark": "Mark must track Sophie's repeated prompts, hesitation, closer gaze, lowered voice, posture shifts, or reframing and adjust by shortening responses, adding caveats, delaying timing, or redirecting wording to preserve rapport while limiting commitment.", "Sophie": "Sophie must monitor Mark's pauses, hedging, ga... | {"Mark": "Mark and Sophie settle on a private, workable understanding in which Mark's brief caveated reply is accepted by Sophie as an immediate answer without a full commitment, as shown through their restrained dialogue, Sophie's continued pressure narrowing into acceptance, Mark's careful wording, and both maintaini... | {"Mark": {"belief": "Sophie is pushing for an explicit response on a sensitive matter, and his reluctance is becoming visible within their private conversation.", "desire": "To limit how much he commits or reveals while still maintaining workable rapport with Sophie during the gathering.", "intention": "To provide a mi... | images/scenario_036/group_labeled.png | {"Mark": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_02.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_58 | scenario_036 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Sophie; Mark | At the work-related evening gathering, Sophie and Mark sit close together among colleagues and keep their conversation quiet because the issue is socially sensitive in the shared setting. Sophie continues to seek a clear answer to a provocative request, while Mark initially avoids a direct commitment and then offers a ... | {"Mark": "Respondent", "Sophie": "Proponent"} | {"Mark": "Suppression", "Sophie": "Suppression"} | {"Mark": "Collaborating", "Sophie": "Compromising"} | {"Mark": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office professional"}, "Sophie": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office professional"}} | {"Mark": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Mark": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mark at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Sophie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Mark": "Mark must answer with restrained, partial wording that avoids full disclosure while still giving Sophie a minimally usable response in the shared setting.", "Sophie": "Sophie must keep asking for a clear answer in a low voice with selective wording that signals the issue without stating more than necessary in... | {"Mark": "Mark must position the exchange as a contained mutual-management problem by resisting direct commitment first and then offering a limited reply that protects collegial functioning.", "Sophie": "Sophie must pursue a quiet middle-ground resolution by narrowing the request to a usable acknowledgment from Mark ra... | {"Mark": "Mark must track Sophie's persistence, pauses, reframing, facial changes, and posture shifts, and respond by timing a brief clarifying answer, softening wording, or redirecting the exchange to keep it unobtrusive.", "Sophie": "Sophie must monitor Mark's hesitations, interruptions, gaze shifts, and body tension... | {"Mark": "Mark and Sophie bring the sensitive exchange to a socially contained stopping point where Mark's limited awkward reply is accepted by Sophie as a usable answer, as shown through Mark's restrained wording, Sophie's cessation of repeated prompting, and both maintaining unobtrusive gaze and low-volume behavior n... | {"Mark": {"belief": "Sophie expects a direct response from him, but answering fully in this setting could be socially awkward given the nearby coworkers.", "desire": "To manage Sophie's request in a way that limits social exposure while preserving workable collegial relations.", "intention": "To resist committing direc... | images/scenario_036/group_labeled.png | {"Mark": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_02.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_036/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_59 | scenario_037 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Nathan | At the kitchen counter in the shared apartment, Ethan treats out-loud rehearsal as necessary for Nathan to manage a future intimate conversation with the woman he wants to see again, and he keeps pressing that point. Nathan tries to limit how directly he participates by joking and only partly engaging, while Ethan cont... | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Nathan": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Nathan": "Suppression"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Nathan": "Compromising"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Nathan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Nathan": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Nathan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Nathan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must exaggerate how necessary immediate aloud rehearsal is while avoiding any wording that suggests Ethan's advice is optional or merely casual.", "Nathan": "Nathan must suppress full direct participation by using jokes, partial answers, or indirect phrasing without explicitly refusing the exercise out... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must keep positioning the exchange as a joint problem-solving exercise by pressing Nathan to continue practicing directly rather than letting jokes close the topic.", "Nathan": "Nathan must pursue a compromising position by offering limited engagement that keeps the conversation moving while resisting ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Nathan's joking, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture withdrawal and respond by adjusting pressure through firmer restatement when Nathan deflects and clearer collaborative framing when Nathan partially engages.", "Nathan": "Nathan must track Ethan's insistence, reframing, ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Nathan reach a moment where Nathan says at least one partly direct intimate line aloud after Ethan repeatedly frames rehearsal as necessary and joint, with Nathan's limited wording, Ethan's continued restatements, and both characters' verbal and behavioral responses showing that the exercise has no... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Nathan is avoiding direct verbal practice and will not be prepared to say intimate things to the woman he wants to see again unless he rehearses them now.", "desire": "Nathan to openly practice the intimate wording in this conversation so the issue is handled directly.", "intention": "Keep framing... | images/scenario_037/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_01.jpg", "Nathan": "images/scenario_037/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_60 | scenario_038 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Sophia; Elena | Near the seating area, Ethan samples the first course while Sophia manages drinks in support of the hosting flow and Elena explains the dishes already served and those to come. The conversation stays focused on understanding the meal's progression, and Ethan follows that progression toward the kitchen as Elena continue... | {"Elena": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Sophia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Sophia": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Elena": "Collaborating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Sophia": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Culinary Artist"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Food Critic"}, "Sophia": {"age": "28", "char... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Sophia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophia": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should present the served and upcoming dishes in a controlled, selective way that emphasizes progression and intent without fully expanding every detail unless prompted.", "Ethan": "Ethan should ask brief course-focused questions and keep evaluations partial or delayed so Ethan signals attention to Ele... | {"Elena": "Elena should frame the exchange as a shared understanding task by guiding Ethan through the structure of the meal and integrating Sophia's hosting support into the presentation flow.", "Ethan": "Ethan should position Ethan's participation as joint sense-making by following Elena's explanation of the courses ... | {"Elena": "Elena should track Ethan's follow-up questions, hesitation, interruptions, gaze toward the kitchen, and posture shifts along with Sophia's service movements, then slow, clarify, or redirect Elena's framing to keep the meal progression intelligible.", "Ethan": "Ethan should monitor Elena's elaboration, Sophia... | {"Elena": "Elena and Ethan establish a clear mutual account of the served and upcoming dishes, evidenced by Ethan's course-linked replies and gaze following the shift toward the kitchen while Sophia's unobtrusive drink service remains integrated into Elena's framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Elena reach a shared spoken un... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Ethan is attending closely to the dishes, and the scene gives her an opportunity to explain what has been prepared and what will follow.", "desire": "To make the meal's courses and progression clearly understood by the guest.", "intention": "To guide the conversation around the dishes and frame th... | images/scenario_038/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophia": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_61 | scenario_038 | low | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Sophia; Elena | Near the seating area, Ethan samples the first course while Sophia maintains the guest-facing flow of drinks and Elena explains the prepared dishes and the sequence of what will be served next. The conversation stays focused on understanding the meal itself, and as attention shifts toward the kitchen, Ethan follows the... | {"Elena": "Answerer", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Sophia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Sophia": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Sophia": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Culinary Artist"}, "Ethan": {"age": "30", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Food Critic"}, "Sophia": {"age": "28... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Sophia": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophia": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena explains the prepared dish and the next course in clear sequence using accurate descriptions that match the meal's actual structure and intent.", "Ethan": "Ethan states direct observations and clarification requests about each dish and its sequence without implying judgments not yet grounded in what El... | {"Elena": "Elena presents the meal in a measured, mutually responsive way that gives Ethan enough information for understanding without overrunning Sophia's hospitality flow.", "Ethan": "Ethan balances attentive questioning with restraint so Ethan can obtain clear course information while preserving the hosts' presenta... | {"Elena": "Elena tracks Ethan's agreement, hesitation, reframing, eye focus, and posture shifts along with Sophia's service movements, and Elena adjusts explanation pace, specificity, and turn-taking to keep the meal progression understandable.", "Ethan": "Ethan monitors Elena's pacing and Sophia's service timing for h... | {"Elena": "Elena and Ethan establish a clearly verbalized account of the dish progression and culinary intent, while Sophia's coordinated hospitality actions visibly support Elena's pacing so that both Ethan's responses and Sophia's timing confirm the meal structure has been understood.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Elena reac... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes Ethan's understanding of the meal depends on her explanation of what has been prepared and what will come next, within the host-supported setting Sophia is maintaining.", "desire": "She wants Ethan to accurately understand the dishes, their progression, and the culinary intent of the ... | images/scenario_038/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophia": "images/scenario_038/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_62 | scenario_039 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Lily; Mia | In the busy neighborhood café, Lily asks Mia what she wants for her birthday, but Mia's first answer is personal rather than specific, leading Lily to steer the conversation toward a practical choice. As they continue talking over coffee, they settle on a simple suggestion from a bath-and-body shop that gives Lily usab... | {"Lily": "Questioner", "Mia": "Answerer"} | {"Lily": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Lily": "Compromising", "Mia": "Collaborating"} | {"Lily": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "26", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "musician"}} | {"Lily": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Lily": "Lily should state plainly that Mia's first answer is meaningful but not yet actionable and ask for one specific, usable gift direction.", "Mia": "Mia should use strategic withholding by signaling the kind of gift that fits Mia's preference without naming a fully explicit item and instead offer a general bath-... | {"Lily": "Lily should use a compromising approach by validating Mia's personal preference while steering the talk toward a simple option that both can accept.", "Mia": "Mia should take a collaborating stance by linking Mia's personal meaning to Lily's need for practical guidance and help shape a workable gift idea toge... | {"Lily": "Lily should watch for Mia's hesitation, topic shifts, pauses, gaze changes, or posture tightening and respond by softening the wording, narrowing the choices, or slowing the pace until Mia provides a concrete suggestion.", "Mia": "Mia should monitor Lily's reframing, follow-up questions, interruptions, eye fo... | {"Lily": "Lily and Mia arrive in dialogue at a mutually accepted bath-and-body shop gift direction, with Lily's explicit reframing and softened follow-up questions leading Mia to confirm a usable suggestion through words, pacing, and visible easing of hesitation.", "Mia": "Mia and Lily reach a shared understanding that... | {"Lily": {"belief": "Mia's initial response does not give a clear, practical gift option, so the conversation needs to move toward something specific.", "desire": "To reach a mutually acceptable and concrete birthday gift idea that fits the conversation.", "intention": "To keep narrowing the discussion from a personal ... | images/scenario_039/group_labeled.png | {"Lily": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_01.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_039/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_63 | scenario_040 | low | Eristic | 4 | Ethan; Lila; Elena; Ryan | At the table between the kitchen and sitting area, Ethan continues presenting his talk about buying clothing for another woman as acceptable, while Lila openly disputes that framing in front of the others. Elena stays attentive without joining the conflict, and Ryan follows the exchange closely until the argument stall... | {"Elena": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller", "Ryan": "Auxiliary"} | {"Elena": "Suppression", "Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating", "Ryan": "Accommodating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Model"}, "Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Actor"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 30s", "... | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial af... | {"Elena": "Elena must keep verbal contributions minimal and indirect, signaling attention through restrained posture and brief acknowledgments without stating a side in the dispute.", "Ethan": "Ethan must describe the gift and upcoming date in amplified, broadly acceptable terms while avoiding specific details that wou... | {"Elena": "Elena must prioritize preserving workable group contact by withholding evaluative claims and leaving space for the conflict to de-escalate without adding personal stakes.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep arguing for his account as mutually reasonable by inviting group-level validation and reframing the disagreeme... | {"Elena": "Elena must monitor interruptions, stalled pauses, tightened faces, and shifting gaze around the table, then adjust with silence, small acknowledgment cues, or lowered visibility to avoid feeding the dispute.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Lila's interruptions, others' gaze withdrawal or tightened posture, ... | {"Elena": "Elena helps the table return toward a workable group exchange when Elena's restrained acknowledgments and nonalignment coincide with reduced back-and-forth between Ethan and Lila and create visible space for Ryan to restart broader conversation.", "Ethan": "Ethan secures at least partial group uptake for his... | {"Elena": {"belief": "She believes the exchange between Ethan and Lila has become a visible dispute that everyone nearby can follow.", "desire": "She wants the social setting to return to a workable group conversation without becoming more divisive.", "intention": "She commits to staying nonconfrontational and not addi... | images/scenario_040/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_040/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_64 | scenario_041 | low | Deliberation | 3 | Ethan; Lily; Daniel | In a quiet corner of the coffeehouse, Ethan and Lily discuss whether Ethan is prepared for the responsibilities of raising a child, with Ethan stating his doubts and Lily steering the conversation toward practical readiness without dismissing them. From nearby, Daniel adds a light comment that keeps him socially includ... | {"Daniel": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lily": "Deliberator"} | {"Daniel": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lily": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Daniel": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lily": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university professor"}, "... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Fear", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "Ethan displays visible signs of anxiety as he expresses his concerns about becoming a father.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel offers one light, topic-relevant remark that honestly signals social support and then leaves space so Ethan and Lily remain the main voices.", "Ethan": "Ethan states specific doubts about readiness and names concrete responsibilities he is unsure about in clear, direct language that matches his inter... | {"Daniel": "Daniel takes an accommodating stance by keeping his contribution brief, non-directive, and secondary to Ethan and Lily's effort to define what parenthood preparation involves.", "Ethan": "Ethan frames the exchange as a joint effort to clarify readiness by inviting Lily's practical input while keeping his ow... | {"Daniel": "Daniel watches for verbal uptake, hesitation, interruption, or reframing from Ethan and Lily, plus facial reactions, gaze withdrawal, and posture tightening, and responds by softening, shortening, or stopping his input to avoid displacing the central discussion.", "Ethan": "Ethan tracks Lily's agreement, he... | {"Daniel": "Daniel, by adding one brief topic-relevant remark and then yielding the floor, contributes to an interaction in which Ethan and Lily visibly and verbally continue the main discussion and incorporate Daniel's presence without treating Daniel's comment as a distraction from clarifying Ethan's readiness for pa... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "He believes Ethan and Lily are seriously weighing readiness for parenthood, and that his side comment can enter the discussion without taking it over.", "desire": "He wants to contribute in a way that supports the discussion's social ease while remaining aligned with the topic of preparation for ... | images/scenario_041/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_041/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_65 | scenario_042 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Clara | At the table, Ethan and Clara move from a joking interruption into a more deliberate exchange about what kind of relationship standard is actually worth defending. As they compare comfort, chemistry, and the possibility of having both, Clara pushes for a clear account of what should realistically be expected while Etha... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Ethan": "Deception"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Ethan": "Compromising"} | {"Clara": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "creative professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state explicitly whether comfort, chemistry, or both belong in a worthwhile relationship standard and make Clara's criteria inspectable through direct wording and consistent examples.", "Ethan": "Ethan must present relationship standards through selective examples and shifting emphasis that sound ... | {"Clara": "Clara must negotiate toward a usable shared standard by making limited concessions on realism while continuing to press Ethan for a concrete account that can be compared fairly.", "Ethan": "Ethan must pursue a middle-ground position that keeps the exchange moving toward a workable standard while avoiding any... | {"Clara": "Clara must track Ethan's hedging, topic shifts, delayed answers, gaze aversion, half-smiles, or tension cues and respond by tightening the question, slowing the pace, or restating the comparison in more concrete terms.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for Clara's interruptions, follow-up demands, narrowed gaze, ... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan reach a clear comparison on whether comfort, chemistry, or both should define a worthwhile relationship, with Clara's direct questions and restatements producing dialogue and visible pauses that show Ethan's position is engaged but still only partly pinned down.", "Ethan": "Ethan and Clara ar... | {"Clara": {"belief": "She believes the conversation is now a direct attempt to clarify what kind of romantic relationship is realistically desirable after previous disappointments.", "desire": "She wants a clear and credible shared understanding of whether closeness and attraction should both be expected in a worthwhil... | images/scenario_042/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_66 | scenario_042 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Ethan; Clara | Over takeout at the kitchen table, Ethan and Clara let the joking interruption give way to a more pointed discussion about what standard should guide romantic choices. Their conversation centers on whether comfort and chemistry must be treated as a tradeoff or whether a worthwhile partner should realistically offer bot... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Ethan": "Deliberator"} | {"Clara": "Deception", "Ethan": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Avoiding", "Ethan": "Avoiding"} | {"Clara": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "creative professional"}, "Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara should use deceptive selective framing to discuss the viability of closeness and attraction together as a general standard while concealing any fixed personal ranking until Ethan's position is clearer.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state the comfort-versus-chemistry question in amplified either-or language ... | {"Clara": "Clara should maintain an avoiding stance by redirecting the exchange toward a workable shared standard and away from explicit self-disclosure or direct opposition about which quality matters more.", "Ethan": "Ethan should maintain an avoiding stance by posing the standard as an abstract evaluation of relatio... | {"Clara": "Clara should monitor Ethan's agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, facial tension, posture shifts, and gaze direction, then adjust timing, ambiguity, and framing to reveal slightly more or withhold more so Clara is not seen as unclear or inconsistent.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Clara's agre... | {"Clara": "Clara and Ethan end the exchange with a mutually recognizable workable standard that a relationship should be evaluated for the realistic presence of both closeness and attraction, with Clara’s selective framing and calibrated withholding leading Ethan to state a clear criterion that Clara can visibly ratify... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The dinner talk has become a direct test of what kind of relationship is worth pursuing, and Ethan is willing to examine whether comfort and attraction must be balanced or prioritized.", "desire": "To keep the discussion oriented toward a workable relationship standard without fully exposing a fix... | images/scenario_042/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_042/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_67 | scenario_043 | low | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Ben; Lila; Sophie | Near the dining area opening into the living space, the conversation narrows to clarifying whether the child should spend the following day with a relative and how that plan will be understood by everyone present. Ethan speaks directly to make the arrangement explicit, Lila selectively shares what is needed to keep the... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Strategic Withholding", "Sophie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating", "Sophie": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "scientist"}, "Lila": {"age": "th... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affe... | {"Ben": "Ben must support the proposed childcare plan by using amplifying language that makes the arrangement sound broadly acceptable without contradicting what others have already stated.", "Ethan": "Ethan must state the next-day childcare arrangement in direct and specific terms, openly naming any assumption Ethan i... | {"Ben": "Ben must strategically yield personal leverage by backing whichever version of the plan appears easiest for the group to accept so group agreement is prioritized over Ben's own preference.", "Ethan": "Ethan must position the discussion as a joint clarification problem by inviting others to confirm or correct t... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, facial tightening, posture changes, or gaze aversion and soften or heighten Ben's supportive framing to match what seems most likely to preserve acceptance of the plan.", "Ethan": "Ethan must watch for agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframi... | {"Ben": "Ben, by backing the emerging proposal with supportive amplifying comments calibrated to others' reactions, helps Ethan, Lila, and Sophie converge on treating the child's next-day visit with the relative as the acceptable group arrangement.", "Ethan": "Ethan, through direct clarification and responsive checking... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Others are actively evaluating the next-day arrangement, and his comments can influence how acceptable the plan seems to the group.", "desire": "To support a version of the arrangement that the others can readily go along with.", "intention": "To frame the situation in a way that encourages agreemen... | images/scenario_043/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_03.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_68 | scenario_043 | low | Deliberation | 4 | Ethan; Ben; Lila; Sophie | Near the dining area opening into the living space, the conversation narrows to clarifying whether the child should spend the following day with a relative and what that would mean for responsibility during the visit. Ethan keeps his position limited, Lila presents her view selectively, Sophie pushes toward a balanced ... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator", "Sophie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Exaggeration", "Ethan": "Strategic Withholding", "Lila": "Deception", "Sophie": "Suppression"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Avoiding", "Lila": "Avoiding", "Sophie": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Ethan": {"age": "thirties", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "scientist"}, "Lila": {"age": "th... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affe... | {"Ben": "Ben should amplify how workable and simple the easiest arrangement sounds so his comments push the group toward accepting a shared plan.", "Ethan": "Ethan should state only narrow, conditional points about the child's visit while omitting any direct endorsement or ownership of responsibility.", "Lila": "Lila s... | {"Ben": "Ben should yield his own preferences and verbally support whichever arrangement seems most likely to help Ethan, Lila, and Sophie align on responsibility.", "Ethan": "Ethan should keep a low-commitment position by deflecting pressure to choose a side and letting the group carry the discussion forward.", "Lila"... | {"Ben": "Ben should track agreement cues, hesitation, overlapping speech, and posture softening or tension in Ethan, Lila, and Sophie and adjust by intensifying reassurance, simplifying the proposal, or backing off to preserve coordination.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for direct questions, interruptions, leaning in,... | {"Ben": "Ben's amplifying and accommodating comments should lead Ethan, Lila, and Sophie to verbally converge on a workable understanding of the child's visit and who will oversee it, supported by their confirming responses and reduced interactional tension.", "Ethan": "Ethan's limited and conditional replies should le... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The group is trying to settle the next day's arrangement, and his comments can help others align around a workable understanding.", "desire": "To support a shared agreement that fits the others' expectations about who will oversee the child's visit.", "intention": "To frame the situation in a way th... | images/scenario_043/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_02.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_03.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_043/individual/character_04.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_69 | scenario_044 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Clara; Lila | At the busy gathering, Lila and Clara briefly separate from the main conversational flow to address a personal wedding matter that depends on Clara's decision. Lila seeks a definite answer about whether Clara will be maid of honour, and Clara's response is positioned as the key to clarifying their mutual expectations. | {"Clara": "Answerer", "Lila": "Questioner"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}} | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state a direct yes or no about the maid of honour role and align wording, tone, and visible commitment cues with Clara's actual level of commitment.", "Lila": "Lila must use exaggeration to stress how important Clara's decision is while still making the request explicitly aimed at obtaining a defi... | {"Clara": "Clara must use a collaborating stance by framing the answer as a shared clarification of expectations and practical reliability for the wedding plans.", "Lila": "Lila must use a collaborating stance by presenting Clara's decision as a joint planning issue and inviting a clear answer that supports mutual expe... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Lila's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, gaze fixation, posture tightening, or relief cues and adjust pacing and specificity to keep the answer unmistakable.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Clara's pauses, qualifiers, topic shifts, facial tightening, gaze aversion, or leaning back and t... | {"Clara": "Clara and Lila reach a mutually acknowledged understanding of whether Clara will serve as maid of honour, shown by Clara giving an unmistakable yes-or-no answer, Lila verbally confirming what Clara's answer means for the wedding plans, and both displaying matching cues of conversational closure.", "Lila": "L... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Lila is asking her directly for a personal commitment about the wedding, and Clara's reply will determine whether Lila can rely on her in that role.", "desire": "To establish a clear and accurate understanding with Lila about whether she will serve as maid of honour.", "intention": "To give Lila a... | images/scenario_044/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_044/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_70 | scenario_045 | low | Eristic | 3 | Emma; Lucas; Clara | Inside the dental office during work hours, Emma and Clara confront Lucas together near the chair and make the breakup explicit, presenting a united account of his overlapping betrayals. Their remarks focus on undermining his excuses and fixing responsibility for past encounters in the room, while Lucas tries to keep t... | {"Clara": "Quarreller", "Emma": "Quarreller", "Lucas": "Quarreller"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Emma": "Deception", "Lucas": "Exaggeration"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Emma": "Collaborating", "Lucas": "Collaborating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Emma": {"age": "mid-20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "dental assistant"}, "Lucas": ... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Emma": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emma": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state concrete overlap and sequence details plainly and consistently with Emma so Lucas cannot plausibly recast the confrontation as vague or mistaken.", "Emma": "Emma must present selected details as if independently confirmed while omitting coordination with Clara so Lucas's excuses appear incon... | {"Clara": "Clara must collaborate with Emma by reinforcing shared facts, inviting direct acknowledgment from Lucas, and keeping the exchange focused on one decisive account rather than side arguments.", "Emma": "Emma must keep Emma's statements tightly aligned with Clara's wording and jointly press for one clear accoun... | {"Clara": "Clara must monitor Lucas's hesitation, interruptions, evasive wording, facial tightening, and gaze avoidance and then pause for emphasis, repeat disputed facts, or sharpen framing when Lucas tries to dilute responsibility.", "Emma": "Emma must watch for Lucas's interruptions, reframing attempts, gaze shifts,... | {"Clara": "Clara and Emma secure a plainly stated acknowledgment in the exchange that Lucas's ties overlapped and that the breakup is final, with Lucas's evasive replies and behavioral cues failing to break their shared account.", "Emma": "Emma and Clara establish through matching statements, coordinated turn-taking, a... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Clara believes that Lucas's conduct with her and Emma overlaps and that speaking plainly alongside Emma makes it harder for Lucas to deny the pattern.", "desire": "Clara wants clear acknowledgment of the overlap and a decisive end to any ambiguity about Lucas's ties to either of them.", "intention... | images/scenario_045/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emma": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_045/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_71 | scenario_046 | low | Eristic | 2 | Ava; Lila | At the kitchen table, Ava and Lila argue over whose life should count as more enviable, with one citing desirable experiences and the other insisting that family burdens and constraints must also define the comparison. In the late-night apartment kitchen, the exchange sharpens as each tries to secure recognition for he... | {"Ava": "Quarreller", "Lila": "Quarreller"} | {"Ava": "Suppression", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ava": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Ava": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}} | {"Ava": "Neutral", "Lila": "Sadness"} | {"Ava": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ava at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "Lila's facial expression shows frustration and inadequacy at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ava": "Ava should state family responsibilities and constraints selectively while leaving broader evaluative judgments implied so Ava can redirect the comparison without fully exposing concession points.", "Lila": "Lila should openly state concrete examples of limited opportunities and desirable experiences in direct... | {"Ava": "Ava should frame the dispute as a joint clarification of fair comparison criteria by linking Ava's burdens to the standards Lila uses rather than simply negating Lila's examples.", "Lila": "Lila should pursue a collaborative case that tests both positions against shared standards of fairness while maintaining ... | {"Ava": "Ava should watch for Lila's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, tightened posture, or averted gaze and then adjust by pausing, narrowing the claim, or restating burdens as relevant comparison criteria.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Ava's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, counter-reframing, gaze shifts, ... | {"Ava": "Ava and Lila explicitly test whose life is more enviable against a shared fairness standard that includes family responsibilities and concrete desirable experiences, with Ava's selective statements about burdens prompting Lila to address those constraints in dialogue and visible pauses or posture shifts.", "Li... | {"Ava": {"belief": "Lila is framing the conversation as a comparison of who has had the more desirable life and is dismissing burdens that Ava sees as relevant to that comparison.", "desire": "To have her constraints and family responsibilities recognized as valid factors in judging whose life has been more enviable.",... | images/scenario_046/group_labeled.png | {"Ava": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_046/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_72 | scenario_047 | low | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Liam | In a corner of the coffeehouse seating area, Liam asks Ethan to weigh in on different versions of a name, noting each one down as Ethan offers direct judgments. Their conversation becomes a playful comparison of which full name sounds most memorable when placed alongside famous musical titles, with Liam using Ethan's r... | {"Ethan": "Answerer", "Liam": "Questioner"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Liam": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Liam at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state clear comparative judgments about each name version and title pairing in explicit terms so Liam can track Ethan's real evaluation without ambiguity.", "Liam": "Liam must present name variants selectively while withholding broader selection criteria, revealing only enough context in dialogue ... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must position Ethan's feedback as a joint narrowing process by openly building on Liam's proposals and offering specific reasons that improve shared selection.", "Liam": "Liam must structure the exchange as a cooperative comparison by inviting Ethan's judgments, integrating useful feedback, and steerin... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must watch Liam's note-taking pace, pauses, gaze shifts, and any reframing or interruption, then adjust Ethan's response length and specificity to keep the evaluation useful and collaborative.", "Liam": "Liam must track Ethan's directness, hesitation, emphasis, posture shifts, and facial changes during... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Liam visibly converge on one name version as the strongest stage-oriented option, with Ethan's explicit comparisons and Liam's note-taking, follow-up selections, and reduced reframing providing shared evidence that the options have been narrowed.", "Liam": "Liam and Ethan arrive at a refined name c... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Liam is using the conversation to evaluate possible versions of a name and how well they fit with recognizable stage-related references.", "desire": "To help produce a name option that is clear, memorable, and suitable within the shared discussion.", "intention": "To give direct evaluative respons... | images/scenario_047/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_01.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_047/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_73 | scenario_048 | low | Deliberation | 3 | Liam; Derek; Michael | In the shared lounge area, Liam, Derek, and Michael focus their discussion on the practical limits established by the veterinarian's advice and what those limits mean for Michael's monkey. Their conversation centers on identifying which zoos could realistically accept the animal and whether any option is workable enoug... | {"Derek": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator", "Michael": "Deliberator"} | {"Derek": "Honest Signaling", "Liam": "Honest Signaling", "Michael": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Derek": "Collaborating", "Liam": "Collaborating", "Michael": "Avoiding"} | {"Derek": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Michael": {"age": "late ... | {"Derek": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Derek": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Derek": "Derek must openly articulate how the veterinarian's limits affect each zoo option and specify when an option lacks enough support rather than overstating clarity.", "Liam": "Liam must state plainly which zoo options seem workable or unworkable under the veterinarian's limits and verbally mark any uncertainty... | {"Derek": "Derek must pursue a collaborating strategy by helping distinguish viable from nonviable placements through joint reasoning and by building on Liam's and Michael's stated constraints.", "Liam": "Liam must use a collaborating stance by comparing options aloud, inviting Derek and Michael to test the same criter... | {"Derek": "Derek must monitor agreement, hesitation, interruption, reframing, facial tightening, gaze withdrawal, and posture shifts from Liam and Michael, then adjust by asking a clarifying question, offering a concise comparison, or pausing to re-anchor the criteria.", "Liam": "Liam must watch for agreement, hesitati... | {"Derek": "Derek, Liam, and Michael establish an explicit distinction between acceptable and unsupported zoo options under the veterinarian's limits, with Derek's clarifying comparisons and adjustments to others' cues helping the group reach a defined option set.", "Liam": "Liam, Derek, and Michael verbally converge on... | {"Derek": {"belief": "The veterinarian's limits restrict what can be done, so the key issue is identifying which zoos would accept the monkey under those conditions.", "desire": "To clarify the available options so the group can narrow the decision to acceptable placements.", "intention": "To contribute to evaluating a... | images/scenario_048/group_labeled.png | {"Derek": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_02.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_74 | scenario_048 | low | Deliberation | 3 | Liam; Derek; Michael | In a shared lounge area, Liam, Derek, and Michael focus their discussion on the veterinarian’s limits and what those limits realistically allow regarding Michael’s monkey. As they compare which zoos might accept it, each tries to shape the group’s judgment about which placement is genuinely workable and whether keeping... | {"Derek": "Deliberator", "Liam": "Deliberator", "Michael": "Deliberator"} | {"Derek": "Exaggeration", "Liam": "Deception", "Michael": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Derek": "Accommodating", "Liam": "Accommodating", "Michael": "Collaborating"} | {"Derek": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "writer"}, "Liam": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "actor"}, "Michael": {"age": "late 20s", "char... | {"Derek": "Neutral", "Liam": "Neutral", "Michael": "Neutral"} | {"Derek": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Liam": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Michael": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Derek": "Derek should amplify the practical advantages or disadvantages of specific zoo options beyond their confirmed strength so the comparison sounds decisive without inventing new facts outright.", "Liam": "Liam should selectively describe zoo possibilities as more settled or compatible than Liam fully believes w... | {"Derek": "Derek should accommodate the group’s direction by presenting strong comparative statements that support a viable placement option while avoiding direct confrontation over ownership of the decision.", "Liam": "Liam should accommodate the others’ stated preferences and steer the talk toward the option that sou... | {"Derek": "Derek should track whether Liam or Michael agree, hesitate, reframe, interrupt, avert gaze, or show tension in posture, and then reduce or intensify Derek’s comparisons to keep credibility while pushing for a clear judgment.", "Liam": "Liam should watch for agreement, hesitation, interruptions, narrowed gaze... | {"Derek": "Derek helps produce a shared comparative judgment in which Liam, Derek, and Michael explicitly treat one zoo placement as sufficiently viable to remain under serious consideration, with Derek’s amplified contrasts being met by responses from Liam and Michael that show the comparison has shaped the group’s co... | {"Derek": {"belief": "The current decision depends on how feasible different zoos are as placements under the veterinarian’s stated limits.", "desire": "To get the group to recognize a placement option as sufficiently viable to continue considering it seriously.", "intention": "To present the differences among zoo opti... | images/scenario_048/group_labeled.png | {"Derek": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_02.jpg", "Liam": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_01.jpg", "Michael": "images/scenario_048/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_75 | scenario_049 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | In the shared apartment, Jade argues that the Cats open call should be viewed as a chance worth considering, using jokes and a personal example to make embarrassment seem less important than passing up the opportunity. Elena responds by insisting that her discomfort with performing is a sufficient reason not to treat t... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Honest Signaling", "Jade Reynolds": "Deception"} | {"Elena Hart": "Collaborating", "Jade Reynolds": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena Hart at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Jade Reynolds at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must state plainly that discomfort with performing is enough reason not to find the audition appealing without softening or disguising that position.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must use joking and a personal example to present the audition as low-stakes while concealing how strongly Ja... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must collaboratively keep the discussion centered on mutual understanding by asserting personal limits while acknowledging Jade Reynolds's opportunity framing without adopting it.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must collaboratively frame Elena Hart's reluctance as a solvable difference in ... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must track Jade Reynolds's jokes, reframing, interruptions, leaning in, expectant gaze, or tension cues and respond by restating the boundary more directly, narrowing the point under dispute, or pausing until Jade Reynolds addresses Elena Hart's stated limit.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart and Jade Reynolds arrive at a clear conversational result in which Jade Reynolds explicitly recognizes Elena Hart's discomfort with performing as a valid reason not to treat the Cats open call as appealing, with that recognition supported by Elena Hart's direct statements, Jade Reynolds's rep... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Jade is seriously trying to persuade her that not taking the audition chance would be a worse choice than risking embarrassment.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance about performing to be accepted as a valid reason not to pursue the audition.", "intention": "Elena commits to asserting her... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_76 | scenario_049 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | At the apartment table, Jade argues that the Cats open call is worth considering and uses humor and a personal example to make the opportunity seem less important to fear than missing out. Elena answers by insisting that her discomfort with performing is a legitimate basis for refusing, turning the exchange into a fami... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Honest Signaling", "Jade Reynolds": "Suppression"} | {"Elena Hart": "Compromising", "Jade Reynolds": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena Hart at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Jade Reynolds at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must state plainly that discomfort with performing is a sufficient reason to refuse the audition and make that basis explicit without hedging.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must downplay pressure by using humor and a personal example while leaving direct concern about Elena's refusal impl... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must hold the line that her reluctance should count while keeping the negotiation bounded to recognition of her reason rather than escalating into a broader rejection of Jade Reynolds.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must frame the exchange as a joint evaluation of whether the audition is w... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart must track Jade Reynolds's joking tone, reframing, interruptions, or leaning in, and if those cues intensify, Elena Hart must answer more directly, slow the exchange, or restate the boundary in firmer terms.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds must watch for Elena Hart's interruptions, hesitati... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart and Jade Reynolds reach an explicit conversational outcome in which Jade Reynolds acknowledges that Elena Hart's discomfort with performing is a legitimate reason not to dismiss, while Elena Hart allows that the Cats audition can remain under consideration rather than being argued as an easy ... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Elena believes Jade is seriously trying to persuade her to consider the audition, while her own discomfort with performing is a valid reason not to treat it as an easy or casual step.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance about auditioning to be recognized as reasonable and not overridden b... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_77 | scenario_049 | low | Persuasion | 2 | Jade Reynolds; Elena Hart | At the table, Jade argues that the Broadway open call for Cats is worth considering, using jokes and a personal story to recast embarrassment as less important than missed opportunities. Across from her, Elena answers by clearly asserting that her discomfort with performing is a sufficient reason not to go, turning the... | {"Elena Hart": "Respondent", "Jade Reynolds": "Proponent"} | {"Elena Hart": "Honest Signaling", "Jade Reynolds": "Suppression"} | {"Elena Hart": "Collaborating", "Jade Reynolds": "Compromising"} | {"Elena Hart": {"age": "27", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}, "Jade Reynolds": {"age": "28", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "actress"}} | {"Elena Hart": "Neutral", "Jade Reynolds": "Neutral"} | {"Elena Hart": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena Hart at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Jade Reynolds": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Jade Reynolds at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart should state plainly that discomfort with performing is a sufficient reason not to audition and avoid softening that position in ways that could imply willingness Jade Reynolds can reinterpret.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds should use jokes and a personal example to present the audition a... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart should engage Jade Reynolds as a discussion partner by clearly asserting refusal while framing acceptance of that refusal as the shared solution that respects both the conversation and Elena Hart's position.", "Jade Reynolds": "Jade Reynolds should position the discussion as a negotiable midd... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart should track whether Jade Reynolds responds with agreement, joking reframes, continued persuasion, interruptions, leaning in, fixed gaze, or tension cues and then adjust by either briefly elaborating the boundary conversationally or ending negotiation more directly when acceptance is not fort... | {"Elena Hart": "Elena Hart and Jade Reynolds arrive at an observable result where Elena Hart's plain statement that discomfort is enough reason not to audition is treated by Jade Reynolds as accepted rather than negotiable, as shown through Elena Hart's unsoftened wording and Jade Reynolds' shift from persuasion to ack... | {"Elena Hart": {"belief": "Elena believes Jade is seriously trying to convince her to consider the audition despite her stated discomfort with performing.", "desire": "Elena wants her reluctance to audition to be understood and accepted as a valid position within the discussion.", "intention": "Elena intends to maintai... | images/scenario_049/group_labeled.png | {"Elena Hart": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_02.jpg", "Jade Reynolds": "images/scenario_049/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_78 | scenario_050 | low | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Ben | Late in the evening in their apartment living room, Elena and Ben discuss starting a family while trying to agree on a practical immediate next step. They weigh whether to continue talking where they are or shift the conversation over coffee, with both options being evaluated against keeping the discussion active and B... | {"Ben": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Ben": "Avoiding", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "office worker"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Joy"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena displays a joyful facial affect at the beginning of the dialogue, as indicated by the aftermath of a joyous hospital event."} | {"Ben": "Ben should state plainly which continuation option fits his early morning obligations and specify the schedule limit that must bound the discussion.", "Elena": "Elena should present support for either staying in the living room or shifting to coffee while keeping any stronger personal preference indirect so th... | {"Ben": "Ben should position himself by narrowing the discussion to only options that protect the next workday and declining expansion beyond those limits.", "Elena": "Elena should frame the choice as a joint problem-solving task by linking continued discussion and Ben's early morning schedule into one mutually workabl... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, pauses, facial tension, or leaning in and then either restate his constraint more clearly or pause escalation to keep engagement constructive within schedule bounds.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tigh... | {"Ben": "Ben reaches a mutually acknowledged continuation arrangement with Elena in which one concrete option for continuing the family discussion is accepted only within the schedule limit Ben states, and both participants' dialogue, pauses, and behavioral cues show that the next workday constraint now bounds the disc... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Any decision about whether to stay or go out for coffee needs to fit with his early morning obligations, and the conversation can continue only if that constraint is recognized.", "desire": "To set terms for continuing the discussion that preserve practicality for the next day while still addressing... | images/scenario_050/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_050/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_79 | scenario_051 | low | Deliberation | 3 | Ethan; Maggie; Lena | At Lena's bedside during an active contraction, Ethan and Maggie keep their exchange centered on matching breathing cues and countdown timing so Lena receives one clear form of guidance. Lena works to make the support usable by indicating what pacing she can follow, turning the moment into a coordinated decision about ... | {"Ethan": "Deliberator", "Lena": "Deliberator", "Maggie": "Deliberator"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lena": "Honest Signaling", "Maggie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Avoiding", "Lena": "Compromising", "Maggie": "Avoiding"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Avoiding", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "labor support partner"}, "Lena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "patient"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s... | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lena": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan states only simple breathing and countdown cues that match Ethan's actual pacing and explicitly avoids adding extra instructions so Lena hears one consistent pattern.", "Lena": "Lena directly states which breathing pace or countdown format Lena can follow and rejects unusable pacing in plain terms so s... | {"Ethan": "Ethan minimizes direct disagreement by quickly yielding wording and timing choices that preserve a single shared cueing pattern for Lena.", "Lena": "Lena seeks a usable middle ground by accepting the parts of Ethan's and Maggie's cueing that help while asking for specific adjustments to the parts that do not... | {"Ethan": "Ethan watches for Maggie's interruptions, hesitation, or reframing and for Lena's gaze shifts, posture tightening, or loss of rhythm, then shortens, delays, or matches Ethan's cues to restore one clear cadence.", "Lena": "Lena tracks whether Ethan and Maggie show agreement, hesitation, interruption, or refra... | {"Ethan": "Ethan, Maggie, and Lena settle on one shared breathing-and-countdown cadence during the contraction, shown by Ethan matching Maggie's wording and timing and Lena explicitly following or confirming that same pattern.", "Lena": "Lena gets Ethan and Maggie to converge on one pacing approach Lena can use during ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lena is in an active contraction and can use short, consistent breathing and timing cues to stay aligned with the support being offered.", "desire": "To establish a clear support pattern that Lena can follow without confusion during the contraction.", "intention": "To keep his guidance limited to ... | images/scenario_051/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lena": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_03.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_051/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_low_80 | scenario_052 | low | Eristic | 2 | Ethan; Maggie | In the narrow hallway outside the doorway, Ethan and Maggie argue over how Carol's reaction should be understood and over whose influence shaped what happened inside. Each tries to control the assignment of responsibility, and the exchange hardens into a contest over blame rather than any shared account. | {"Ethan": "Quarreller", "Maggie": "Quarreller"} | {"Ethan": "Deception", "Maggie": "Deception"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Maggie": "Collaborating"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "software engineer"}, "Maggie": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "elementary school teacher"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Maggie": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Maggie": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Maggie at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan should present a selective account of Carol's reaction that downplays Ethan's role while implying Maggie's influence was decisive through pointed wording and controlled emphasis.", "Maggie": "Maggie should offer a selective account of Carol's reaction that highlights Ethan's role while minimizing signs... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should frame the hallway argument as a joint interpretation problem and press Maggie to acknowledge multiple causes while steering the conclusion away from sole responsibility for Ethan.", "Maggie": "Maggie should present the dispute as a shared effort to identify what shaped Carol's reaction while ins... | {"Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Maggie's interruptions, hesitation, reframing, narrowed gaze, or posture tightening and then adjust by speaking sooner, adding specific challenges, or softening phrasing to keep blame from settling on Ethan.", "Maggie": "Maggie should track Ethan's agreement markers, hesitation, interr... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Maggie should end the hallway exchange with both explicitly acknowledging in dialogue that Carol's reaction cannot be attributed to Ethan alone, as shown by Ethan's redirected challenges, Maggie's partial concessions or qualified resistance, and both participants' observable timing, gaze, and postu... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Carol's having sent him out has positioned him as a target of blame, and Maggie is using the hallway exchange to define his role in what happened inside.", "desire": "To prevent Maggie's account from fixing responsibility on him and to establish that her influence was also central to Carol's react... | images/scenario_052/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_01.jpg", "Maggie": "images/scenario_052/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_01 | scenario_053 | medium | Information-seeking | 4 | Emily; Ryan; Daniel; Lily | In the shared seating area of the busy coffeehouse, Ryan, Daniel, and Lily keep pressing Emily with teasing questions because they read her dinner with a coworker as possibly more significant than she is labeling it. Emily responds by keeping her account minimal and repeatedly defining the outing as simply dinner, tryi... | {"Daniel": "Questioner", "Emily": "Answerer", "Lily": "Questioner", "Ryan": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Deception", "Emily": "Suppression", "Lily": "Honest Signaling", "Ryan": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Daniel": "Collaborating", "Emily": "Competing", "Lily": "Collaborating", "Ryan": "Collaborating"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "freelance writer"}, "Emily": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lily": {"age"... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Emily": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial ... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must use teasing prompts that imply the dinner remains open to a more significant reading without directly stating that implication as Daniel's own settled view.", "Emily": "Emily must keep descriptions of the dinner brief and ordinary, using indirect wording and omitted detail so the outing stays fr... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must collaboratively keep the exchange discussable by feeding the group's interpretive momentum with pointed prompts that invite Emily to specify the dinner more clearly.", "Emily": "Emily must competitively steer the exchange back to a plain account of the dinner and block attempts to attach a more ... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Emily's clipped replies, deflections, posture tightening, and whether Ryan or Lily align or reframe, then vary the sharpness and timing of prompts to sustain pressure without ending the exchange.", "Emily": "Emily must watch for renewed teasing, interruptions, leaning in, raised brows, o... | {"Daniel": "Daniel helps keep the dinner socially interpretable by drawing from Emily a more specific statement that Ryan, Daniel, and Lily can actively discuss or echo, with Daniel's pointed teasing, Emily's constrained clarifications, and the others' uptake or visible reactions showing the outcome.", "Emily": "Emily ... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Emily's insistence that it is 'just dinner' does not fully settle the question of whether the outing is a date.", "desire": "To draw out information that lets the group treat the situation as interpretable and discussable.", "intention": "To continue using pointed, teasing prompts that pressure E... | images/scenario_053/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_02 | scenario_053 | medium | Information-seeking | 4 | Emily; Ryan; Daniel; Lily | In the coffeehouse lounge, Ryan, Daniel, and Lily focus on whether Emily's dinner with a coworker should be understood as a date, using teasing questions to press for a clearer label and more detail. Emily keeps the exchange contained by offering minimal information and repeatedly framing the plan as simply dinner, res... | {"Daniel": "Questioner", "Emily": "Answerer", "Lily": "Questioner", "Ryan": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Exaggeration", "Emily": "Suppression", "Lily": "Suppression", "Ryan": "Deception"} | {"Daniel": "Competing", "Emily": "Compromising", "Lily": "Competing", "Ryan": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "freelance writer"}, "Emily": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Lily": {"ag... | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Emily": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral", "Ryan": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Daniel at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Emily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Emily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lily at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ryan": "No clear facial ... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must exaggerate the implications of 'just dinner' by amplifying small details or ambiguities into signs that the outing is more than a neutral coworker meal.", "Emily": "Emily must keep answers short, vague, and repetitively framed as 'just dinner' so that personal meaning and confirming details rema... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must take a competing stance by sustaining the teasing thread and pushing for a firmer characterization that challenges Emily's ordinary framing.", "Emily": "Emily must use a compromising stance by conceding small factual points while blocking any stronger label that would let the group define the ou... | {"Daniel": "Daniel must monitor Emily's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, half-smiles, crossed arms, or gaze shifts, and adjust by escalating the teasing, reframing the question, or yielding briefly before returning to the same interpretive pressure.", "Emily": "Emily must watch for teasing reframes, interruptions,... | {"Daniel": "Daniel, by exaggerating ambiguities and sustaining the challenge to Emily's neutral framing, must help produce an exchange in which Ryan and Lily reinforce the date-like interpretation and Emily responds with a more definite but still minimal characterization.", "Emily": "Emily, through repeated short repli... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Emily's insistence that it is 'just dinner' leaves room to challenge that claim and invite a fuller account.", "desire": "To have the group recognize the dinner as more than a neutral coworker meal, or at least to get clearer details about it.", "intention": "To sustain the teasing line of conver... | images/scenario_053/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_03.jpg", "Emily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_04.jpg", "Ryan": "images/scenario_053/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_03 | scenario_001 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Daniel | At their table in the quiet restaurant, Elena responds to Daniel's breakup story by directly asking how he got through a similar situation, treating his experience as relevant guidance. Daniel keeps the conversation centered on his answer, and their exchange settles into joking discussion of minor revenge acts people m... | {"Daniel": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Daniel": "Suppression", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Daniel": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Daniel": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "freelance writer"}} | {"Daniel": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Daniel": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Daniel": "Daniel should answer Elena with selective detail that gives a workable account of how Daniel handled the breakup while leaving more personal elements implicit or briefly stated.", "Elena": "Elena should phrase requests for Daniel's breakup account with amplified emphasis on how useful or relatable his examp... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should prioritize a manageable and comfortable exchange by giving Elena usable guidance, accepting Elena's focus on Daniel's experience, and steering the tone toward lighter examples instead of extended self-focus.", "Elena": "Elena should keep directing the exchange toward concrete advice from Danie... | {"Daniel": "Daniel should monitor Elena's agreement, interruptions, direct follow-ups, smile cues, gaze focus, or signs of impatience and adjust by adding concrete detail when Elena seeks clarity or shifting into lighter joking examples when Elena appears to prefer less weight.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Daniel... | {"Daniel": "Daniel and Elena settle into a mutually maintained conversation in which Daniel answers Elena's request with a restrained but concrete account of how Daniel handled the breakup and Elena accepts that answer by continuing with joking minor revenge examples rather than demanding deeper disclosure.", "Elena": ... | {"Daniel": {"belief": "Elena is looking to his past experience for guidance and expects him to respond without making the conversation overly heavy.", "desire": "To provide an answer that is informative enough to satisfy Elena's question while keeping the interaction comfortable and manageable.", "intention": "To answe... | images/scenario_001/group_labeled.png | {"Daniel": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_001/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_04 | scenario_002 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Lila | In the shared apartment's living area, Elena and Lila use their conversation over drinks to settle a clear account of the day's responsibilities. Lila openly confirms that she will concentrate on her coffee shop shift, while Elena presents her next step as going out to look for paid work, leaving both with an agreed un... | {"Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "job seeker"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "coffee shop employee"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena states that Elena is going out to look for paid work and avoids details that could let Lila test whether the plan is fully candid.", "Lila": "Lila clearly states that Lila will focus on the coffee shop shift and explicitly confirms the shared plan that Elena will look for work."} | {"Elena": "Elena pushes the conversation toward accepting Elena's stated job-search plan as sufficient proof that Elena is handling responsibilities and resists openings for further scrutiny.", "Lila": "Lila frames the exchange as a mutual coordination check by linking Lila's shift and Elena's job search into one clear... | {"Elena": "Elena watches for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, narrowed gaze, or posture stiffening and, if such signals appear, Elena quickly restates the plan more firmly and closes the topic before deeper questioning develops.", "Lila": "Lila monitors Elena's wording, pauses, interruptions, gaze shifts, a... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila end the exchange with matching verbal statements and confirming behavioral cues that Elena will go out to look for paid work while Lila accepts this as Elena's responsibility for the day without pursuing further scrutiny.", "Lila": "Lila and Elena reach an explicit shared account of the day in... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Lila accepts the stated plan that Elena will spend the day looking for paid work while Lila goes to her shift.", "desire": "To maintain Lila's acceptance of her stated plan and preserve her standing as someone handling her responsibilities.", "intention": "To present her next step as a straightfor... | images/scenario_002/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_05 | scenario_002 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Lila | In the shared apartment that morning, Elena and Lila use their conversation over drinks to settle a clear division of the day's responsibilities. They agree that Lila's priority is her coffee shop shift, while Elena's priority is to go out and pursue job opportunities in the city. | {"Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Deliberator"} | {"Elena": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Compromising"} | {"Elena": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "job seeker"}, "Lila": {"age": "early 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "coffee shop employee"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should amplify the scope and urgency of the planned job search in dialogue or self-talk so the plan appears clearly serious and appropriate for the day.", "Lila": "Lila should keep personal reservations or extra commentary unstated and communicate the morning plan in restrained, minimal terms that emph... | {"Elena": "Elena should press for a firm division of responsibilities that centers Elena on pursuing job opportunities outside the apartment while accepting Lila's work shift as fixed.", "Lila": "Lila should seek a quick workable arrangement by accepting Elena's job-search priority while reinforcing that Lila will foll... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for Lila's agreement, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, or posture tightening and increase or soften the force of Elena's framing to keep the plan recognized as Elena's proper priority.", "Lila": "Lila should monitor Elena's agreement, reframing, interruptions, facial tension, gaze d... | {"Elena": "Elena and Lila explicitly confirm in dialogue, with Elena's enlarged framing and Lila's acknowledgment, that Elena will spend the day pursuing job opportunities outside the apartment while Lila goes to the coffee shop shift, making Elena's role recognizable as the appropriate immediate responsibility.", "Lil... | {"Elena": {"belief": "Lila has a fixed work obligation this morning, and the practical outcome of their discussion is that Elena should use the day to pursue job opportunities outside the apartment.", "desire": "To establish that her immediate priority is actively seeking paid work and that this plan is recognized as t... | images/scenario_002/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_002/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_06 | scenario_003 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the entrance to an exhibit in the museum's natural history area, Elena asks Ben whether the woman who has just appeared outside the exhibit is his ex-wife, seeking to clarify how to interpret the nearby encounter. As Ben answers and the woman is acknowledged from nearby, he frames Elena's understanding of the rela... | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Elena": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "36", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "museum visitor"}, "Elena": {"age": "35", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "museum visitor"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use deceptive phrasing to guide Elena toward the interpretation of his connection to the woman that Ben wants while avoiding statements that can be immediately contradicted by the nearby acknowledgment.", "Elena": "Elena should ask for clarification while strategically withholding any fixed label or... | {"Ben": "Ben should take a competing position by steering the exchange toward Ben's preferred account and the move to the Ice Age section rather than centering Elena's need for full verification.", "Elena": "Elena should pursue a workable shared understanding by framing the question and any follow-up in a compromise-or... | {"Ben": "Ben should track Elena's agreement, hesitation, reframing, eye focus, and the woman's visible acknowledgment, then tighten, redirect, or soften Ben's account and timing to preserve credibility and keep the transition socially manageable.", "Elena": "Elena should monitor Ben's wording, pauses, interruptions, ga... | {"Ben": "Ben establishes an accepted account with Elena of Ben's connection to the nearby woman, shown by Ben's wording guiding Elena's interpretation, the woman's acknowledgment not directly undermining the account, and the exchange moving in a socially manageable way toward the Ice Age section.", "Elena": "Elena reac... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes Elena is seeking to identify the woman accurately and that the woman's presence nearby makes his account open to immediate social evaluation.", "desire": "Ben wants to control how Elena understands his connection to the woman while keeping the transition toward the Ice Age section socia... | images/scenario_003/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_003/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_07 | scenario_004 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Diane; Harold; Lily | During dinner in the family kitchen-dining area, a remark about someone else's failed wedding and the money around it stops functioning as gossip and becomes a contested family meaning. Diane tries to keep control over what is admitted, Lily presses for the implied criticism to be made explicit, and Harold's interventi... | {"Diane": "Quarreller", "Harold": "Auxiliary", "Lily": "Quarreller"} | {"Diane": "Strategic Withholding", "Harold": "Deception", "Lily": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Diane": "Collaborating", "Harold": "Accommodating", "Lily": "Competing"} | {"Diane": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Strategic Withholding", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Retired"}, "Harold": {"age": "50s", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Retired professional"}, "Lily": {"age": "... | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Harold": "Neutral", "Lily": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Harold": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lily": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane must answer Lily by omitting direct admission of any pointed family criticism and keeping references to the failed wedding and money general enough to protect Diane's standing.", "Harold": "Harold must present Diane's side as if Harold is neutrally clarifying the dinner talk while concealing that Harol... | {"Diane": "Diane must steer the exchange toward a shared discussion of what was actually said while limiting concessions that could let blame settle on Diane.", "Harold": "Harold must accommodate family alignment by backing a side in a way that appears supportive rather than openly oppositional so Harold is not treated... | {"Diane": "Diane must watch for Lily's interruptions, demands for explicitness, Harold's reframing, and cues such as fixed gaze or posture tightening, then narrow or broaden Diane's wording to retain control of what is acknowledged.", "Harold": "Harold must track agreement, hesitation, interruption, and reframing from ... | {"Diane": "Diane secures a dinner-table outcome in which Diane and Harold verbally maintain that the remark about the failed wedding and money was general talk while Lily continues contesting that reading, leaving multiple participants' words and visible withholding or insistence to show that blame has not been jointly... | {"Diane": {"belief": "She believes Lily has taken the remark about the failed wedding and its money as a pointed family criticism, and that Harold's involvement is making the dispute more direct.", "desire": "She wants to keep control over what is acknowledged in the discussion while avoiding being positioned as the on... | images/scenario_004/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_01.jpg", "Harold": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_02.jpg", "Lily": "images/scenario_004/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_08 | scenario_005 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Ethan; Lucas | In the apartment rehearsal space, Ethan uses the script pages to cue Lucas for the next responses so their shared dialogue stays accurate as they move through selected scenes. Lucas provides each requested line in sequence, helping preserve their coordination and reliability within the ongoing practice exchange. | {"Ethan": "Questioner", "Lucas": "Answerer"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lucas": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Compromising", "Lucas": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}, "Lucas": {"age": "young adult", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "theater actor"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lucas": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lucas": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lucas at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan states each cue directly from the script and, when uncertain, explicitly marks the uncertainty instead of implying a confirmed next line.", "Lucas": "Lucas delivers each requested line exactly as recalled and explicitly states when recall is incomplete rather than filling gaps with unsupported wording.... | {"Ethan": "Ethan pursues coordinated accuracy by proposing the next scripted response clearly while allowing brief correction or confirmation from Lucas to keep the exchange moving.", "Lucas": "Lucas prioritizes demonstrating dependability by answering Ethan's prompts immediately and asserting the expected line sequenc... | {"Ethan": "Ethan monitors Lucas for prompt agreement, hesitation, interruption, gaze drops toward the pages, or posture tension and adjusts by slowing the cue, repeating the exact prompt, or briefly inviting confirmation before advancing.", "Lucas": "Lucas watches for Ethan's agreement, reframing, interruption, narrowe... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lucas complete the selected scenes with Ethan's direct cues and checks leading to Lucas's confirmed line responses in the correct sequence, as shown by matching dialogue, brief confirmations, script-referenced gaze, and smooth turn transitions.", "Lucas": "Lucas and Ethan establish Lucas as a depen... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "He believes the rehearsal depends on Lucas providing the correct next lines so their shared exchange stays accurate across the selected scenes.", "desire": "He wants the dialogue sequence between them to remain coordinated and accurate during the rehearsal.", "intention": "He intends to guide the ... | images/scenario_005/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lucas": "images/scenario_005/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_09 | scenario_006 | medium | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the busy coffeehouse lounge, Ethan presses for confirmation because the group has not yet settled on exactly what was found in the drink. Lila answers with a direct description and positions her account as sufficient, while Ben adds a joking remark to keep the exchange manageable before the others decline her offer ... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Ethan": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Compromising", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": "28", "character... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should use a joking remark that masks Ben's effort to manage the awkwardness by presenting the comment as casual rather than as a deliberate attempt to steer the exchange.", "Ethan": "Ethan should phrase the request for confirmation with slightly amplified emphasis on the need for precision while avoiding ... | {"Ben": "Ben should prioritize group harmony by supporting Lila's account indirectly and avoiding any push to center Ben's own interpretation of what was found.", "Ethan": "Ethan should pursue a middle-ground stance by pressing for a mutually accepted account and signaling closure once Lila's description appears clear ... | {"Ben": "Ben should track whether Ethan agrees, hesitates, or keeps pressing, along with cues such as strained smiles, widened eyes, cut-off speech, or posture stiffness, then soften, shorten, or drop the joking frame to preserve conversational alignment.", "Ethan": "Ethan should watch for Lila's direct answers, Ben's ... | {"Ben": "Ben helps produce a manageable close to the exchange when Ben's joking remark coexists with Ethan's confirmation-seeking and Lila's direct description, and the group's dialogue, curtailed follow-up, and refusal to inspect further show alignment around Lila's account rather than renewed dispute.", "Ethan": "Eth... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Ben believes the discovery is unpleasant enough to dominate the conversation and that the group is reacting with both disgust and curiosity.", "desire": "He wants to keep the exchange socially manageable by softening the awkwardness without contradicting the shared understanding.", "intention": "He ... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_10 | scenario_006 | medium | Information-seeking | 3 | Ethan; Lila; Ben | In the busy coffeehouse lounge, Ethan responds to Lila's report with disbelief and pushes for clear confirmation about what was found in the drink. Lila describes the object in the cup and even offers to show it as proof, while Ben inserts a joking remark to keep the exchange manageable before the others quickly declin... | {"Ben": "Auxiliary", "Ethan": "Questioner", "Lila": "Answerer"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Ethan": "Suppression", "Lila": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Accommodating", "Ethan": "Competing", "Lila": "Compromising"} | {"Ben": {"age": "33", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "copywriter"}, "Ethan": {"age": "32", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "university lecturer"}, "Lila": {"age": "28", "characteristi... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Ethan": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must use deception by presenting the joking remark as if Ben is simply lightening the exchange while concealing Ben's effort to redirect how the unpleasant discovery is handled.", "Ethan": "Ethan must keep stance cues restrained while using brief, exact questions that narrow Lila's account toward definite ... | {"Ben": "Ben must take an accommodating position by prioritizing the group's comfort over Ben's own need to examine the report closely and by supporting a socially manageable framing.", "Ethan": "Ethan must take a competing position by steering the exchange toward Ethan's demand for clear verification and resisting shi... | {"Ben": "Ben must monitor agreement, hesitation, interruption patterns, and nonverbal tension such as tightened posture or diverted gaze, then increase, reduce, or drop the joking frame depending on whether the group accepts or resists the redirection.", "Ethan": "Ethan must track Lila's hesitation, Ben's interruptions... | {"Ben": "Ben produces a shared conversational outcome in which Ben's joking remark shifts the exchange into a manageable frame, Ethan still obtains verbal clarification from Lila, and the others' quick verbal decline and observable avoidance of the offered proof show that the group closes around discussion rather than ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He believes the discovery is unpleasant but also that the group is negotiating how to talk about it socially.", "desire": "He wants to keep the exchange socially manageable while still participating in the discussion of the discovery.", "intention": "He commits to framing his contribution as a jokin... | images/scenario_006/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_03.jpg", "Ethan": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_006/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_11 | scenario_007 | medium | Deliberation | 2 | Elena; Diane | During a brief lull in the restaurant kitchen, Elena and Diane use a practical conversation at their station to decide whether ending an unsatisfying relationship is worth the likely effect on five other people connected to the man involved. Elena pushes for a clear resolution, while Diane keeps the discussion focused ... | {"Diane": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator"} | {"Diane": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Suppression"} | {"Diane": "Compromising", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Diane": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "head chef"}, "Elena": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "chef"}} | {"Diane": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Diane": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Diane": "Diane should openly state both the relationship dissatisfaction and the likely impact on the five connected people so Diane’s balancing logic is explicit in the conversation.", "Elena": "Elena should state the decision in direct practical terms while suppressing side details about broader complications unles... | {"Diane": "Diane should position the discussion toward mutual concession by acknowledging Elena’s push for closure while insisting that the chosen option also reduce disruption to the wider group.", "Elena": "Elena should press for a definite resolution by repeatedly framing prolonging the relationship as less workable... | {"Diane": "Diane should monitor Elena’s agreement, cutoff attempts, narrowed framing, gaze shifts, or tension cues and then adjust by shortening explanations, re-centering tradeoffs, or proposing a middle-ground formulation that keeps both resolution and social fallout in view.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Diane’... | {"Diane": "Diane and Elena arrive at a mutually stated workable choice in which Elena accepts Diane’s balancing of breakup resolution with reduced disruption to the five connected people, and Diane confirms that the discussion has moved from dissatisfaction to a concrete socially manageable outcome.", "Elena": "Elena a... | {"Diane": {"belief": "The decision about the relationship should take into account both its dissatisfaction and the effect a breakup could have on the five others tied to him.", "desire": "To reach a workable decision that addresses the relationship problem while limiting disruption across the connected group.", "inten... | images/scenario_007/group_labeled.png | {"Diane": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_007/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_12 | scenario_008 | medium | Persuasion | 3 | Clara; Elena; Mia | In the quiet café, Clara argues that Elena should return home, while Elena maintains that her restaurant job shows she is establishing a life where she is. Mia aligns the discussion against Elena's position by questioning whether that work really supports Elena's claim, making the disagreement more pointed. | {"Clara": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Mia": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Compromising", "Elena": "Competing", "Mia": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Elena": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "20s", "char... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must state plainly that Elena's restaurant job is the main reason Elena gives for staying and that Clara sees returning home as more justified, without softening or omitting that stance.", "Elena": "Elena must directly present her restaurant job as genuine evidence that she is establishing a life where... | {"Clara": "Clara must pursue a compromise-oriented case by acknowledging Elena's job as relevant while steering the discussion toward reasons that make returning home the more appropriate option.", "Elena": "Elena must take a competing stance by firmly prioritizing defense of her job as sufficient justification for sta... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Elena's interruptions, hesitation, tightened posture, or averted gaze and adjust by slowing the pace, narrowing each claim to one reason at a time, or briefly inviting confirmation before continuing.", "Elena": "Elena must track Clara's and Mia's reframing, overlap, skeptical looks, or f... | {"Clara": "Clara secures an interaction outcome in which Clara and Mia jointly establish through their explicit challenges and Elena's responses that Elena's restaurant job is acknowledged as relevant but not accepted by the group as sufficient justification for staying, making returning home the more supported positio... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is being urged to return home, and Elena is using her restaurant job as the main justification for staying.", "desire": "Clara wants Elena to accept that returning home is the more appropriate course.", "intention": "Clara commits to framing the discussion around reasons that make returning ... | images/scenario_008/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_01.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_13 | scenario_008 | medium | Persuasion | 3 | Clara; Elena; Mia | In the quiet café, Clara argues that Elena should return home and treats Elena's restaurant job as an unconvincing reason to stay away. Elena counters by presenting that job as evidence that she has established something where she is, while Mia joins in by challenging Elena's account in ways that narrow the strength of... | {"Clara": "Proponent", "Elena": "Respondent", "Mia": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Exaggeration", "Elena": "Deception", "Mia": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Clara": "Competing", "Elena": "Compromising", "Mia": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "unspecified"}, "Elena": {"age": "20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}, "Mia": {"age": "20s", "characteristics... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral", "Mia": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Mia": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Mia at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara must amplify how little Elena's restaurant job proves about staying by using overstated comparisons or emphatic wording that makes returning home sound plainly more valid.", "Elena": "Elena must present her restaurant job as stronger proof of stability than Elena fully believes by selectively shaping d... | {"Clara": "Clara must keep pressing Elena's justification from a competing position by redirecting the exchange toward flaws in Elena's reasoning rather than conceding ground.", "Elena": "Elena must pursue a compromising position by defending the job as legitimate support for staying while offering limited concessions ... | {"Clara": "Clara must watch for Elena's hesitation, interruptions, tightened posture, gaze shifts, or counter-reframing and respond by escalating emphasis, cutting back digressions, or restating the central claim more forcefully.", "Elena": "Elena must track Clara's and Mia's agreement, interruption, skeptical reframin... | {"Clara": "Clara secures an exchange in which Clara's emphatic challenges and Mia's selective support lead Elena to narrow Elena's claim from proving a settled life through the restaurant job to defending it only as partial support for staying.", "Elena": "Elena brings about an exchange in which, despite Clara's exagge... | {"Clara": {"belief": "Elena is using her restaurant job as the main justification for staying away rather than returning home.", "desire": "Clara wants Elena to accept that returning home is the more valid course and to weaken Elena's defense of staying.", "intention": "Clara commits to framing Elena's current situatio... | images/scenario_008/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_01.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_02.jpg", "Mia": "images/scenario_008/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_14 | scenario_054 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Sophie | By the windows in the seating area, Elena receives a phone call about a credit card account, asks the caller's reason, and relays the inquiry to Sophie so the response can pass through her. Sophie answers from her seat, but as the account discussion turns into a frustrated outburst, the exchange breaks down and the cal... | {"Elena": "Questioner", "Sophie": "Answerer"} | {"Elena": "Deception", "Sophie": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Elena": "Competing", "Sophie": "Collaborating"} | {"Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "restaurant manager"}, "Sophie": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "waitress"}} | {"Elena": "Neutral", "Sophie": "Neutral"} | {"Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Sophie": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Elena": "Elena should present the caller's reason and Sophie's reply selectively so Elena appears to be the controlling source of the account information without openly stating that filtering is occurring.", "Sophie": "Sophie should state Sophie's account position plainly and specifically for Elena to relay, making t... | {"Elena": "Elena should keep the phone exchange centered on Elena's control by directing turn-taking, deciding what gets passed along, and resisting any shift that reduces Elena's authority over the response.", "Sophie": "Sophie should frame Sophie's reply as a joint problem of getting the account information across co... | {"Elena": "Elena should watch for the caller's interruptions or sharper tone and Sophie's hesitation, gaze shifts, or posture tension, then tighten or soften Elena's relay pace and wording to preserve control and avoid appearing to obstruct a clear response.", "Sophie": "Sophie should monitor Elena's paraphrasing, dela... | {"Elena": "Elena remains the acknowledged intermediary in the credit card call as the caller's reason and Sophie's account position are both voiced through Elena's relay, but the dialogue and escalating interruptions from the caller and Sophie culminate in a visibly broken exchange that ends abruptly.", "Sophie": "Soph... | {"Elena": {"belief": "The caller is contacting them about a credit card account, and Sophie is the person who needs to provide the relevant response through Elena.", "desire": "To obtain the caller's reason clearly and manage the exchange so the needed account-related information can be relayed through her.", "intentio... | images/scenario_054/group_labeled.png | {"Elena": "images/scenario_054/individual/character_01.jpg", "Sophie": "images/scenario_054/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_15 | scenario_055 | medium | Deliberation | 3 | Elena; Lila; Clara | In the living room, Elena and Clara openly compare whether continuing to trust the original plan still makes sense or whether they should deliberately account for more ordinary outcomes, treating the conversation as a practical effort to establish a workable shared view. From the side, Lila offers brief honest prompts ... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Clara": "Collaborating", "Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career profess... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Sadness", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena displays visible cues of uncertainty and feeling lost at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Clara": "Clara openly compares continued trust in the original plan with more grounded alternatives and clearly states that both alignment and practical preparation need to be considered together.", "Elena": "Elena states plainly that preparing for less ideal outcomes is necessary and names concrete practical options... | {"Clara": "Clara frames Elena's concern and Clara's own view as parts of one solvable problem and works toward a shared formulation instead of treating the options as mutually exclusive.", "Elena": "Elena pushes the discussion toward judging realistic next steps and resists letting the conversation end in an unresolved... | {"Clara": "Clara monitors Elena's directness, Lila's prompts, interruptions, hesitation, facial cues, and posture changes, then modifies Clara's framing, pace, or specificity to preserve joint progress toward a workable common view.", "Elena": "Elena watches for Clara's reframing, Lila's brief prompts, interruptions, g... | {"Clara": "Clara brings Elena and Lila into an explicit shared formulation that continued trust in the original plan must be considered together with preparation for ordinary outcomes, as shown by Elena accepting the combined framing, Lila reinforcing the comparison, and the dialogue settling on a workable common view.... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The original plan is no longer dependable on its own, so the conversation needs to compare continued trust in it with more grounded alternatives.", "desire": "To reach a shared understanding that integrates hope for alignment with practical preparation for ordinary outcomes.", "intention": "To eng... | images/scenario_055/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_16 | scenario_055 | medium | Deliberation | 3 | Elena; Lila; Clara | In the living room, Elena and Clara discuss whether the expected plan still deserves their trust or whether they should begin treating more ordinary outcomes as the more credible path forward. Lila stays at the edge of the exchange with brief prompts and acknowledgments that help keep both positions in play, as the inf... | {"Clara": "Deliberator", "Elena": "Deliberator", "Lila": "Auxiliary"} | {"Clara": "Suppression", "Elena": "Exaggeration", "Lila": "Suppression"} | {"Clara": "Accommodating", "Elena": "Competing", "Lila": "Accommodating"} | {"Clara": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Accommodating", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "28-30", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "early-career professional"}, ... | {"Clara": "Neutral", "Elena": "Sadness", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "Elena's facial affect at the beginning of the dialogue is dominated by visible cues of sadness due to her expressed uncertainty and feeling lost.", "Lila": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Lila at ... | {"Clara": "Clara should keep support for preserving room for the original expectations implicit by speaking cautiously about uncertainty and avoiding a fully final commitment against the expected plan.", "Elena": "Elena should describe the expected plan's unreliability and the need for fallback evaluation in amplified ... | {"Clara": "Clara should accommodate Elena's framing enough to remain socially aligned while still keeping conclusions open so the original expectations are not fully displaced.", "Elena": "Elena should press the discussion toward a definite interpretation centered on fallback options, prioritizing Elena's framing over ... | {"Clara": "Clara should track Elena's intensified wording, Lila's prompts, interruptions, narrowed gaze, or posture changes and answer by yielding briefly, reframing uncertainty more softly, or re-entering with measured language that preserves space for less final conclusions.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Clara's... | {"Clara": "Clara obtains acknowledgment from Elena and Lila that the group's shared understanding can discuss fallback outcomes while still leaving explicit room for the original expectations instead of closing the discussion into a fully final conclusion.", "Elena": "Elena secures explicit responses from Clara and Lil... | {"Clara": {"belief": "The original plan has begun to unravel, and the key issue is whether they should still rely on eventual alignment or begin orienting themselves toward more ordinary outcomes.", "desire": "To reach a socially acceptable understanding of the situation that does not dismiss uncertainty but still pres... | images/scenario_055/group_labeled.png | {"Clara": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_03.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_055/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_17 | scenario_056 | medium | Eristic | 3 | Ben; Clara; Leo | At the reception counter, Ben argues that his case should not remain in the normal queue, while Clara insists that intake will follow the established order and responds in a way that pointedly undercuts his claim. Leo supports Ben's challenge to the delay, turning the public exchange into a direct dispute over whether ... | {"Ben": "Quarreller", "Clara": "Quarreller", "Leo": "Auxiliary"} | {"Ben": "Deception", "Clara": "Deception", "Leo": "Strategic Withholding"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Clara": "Collaborating", "Leo": "Accommodating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "40s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "male", "occupation": "Patient"}, "Clara": {"age": "30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Deception", "gender": "female", "occupation": "Hospital Receptionist"}, "Leo": {"age": "20s", "characterist... | {"Ben": "Anger", "Clara": "Neutral", "Leo": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "Ben's facial expression shows visible pain and frustration at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Clara": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Clara at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Leo": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Leo at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben must present his case as more urgent than the queue indicates by making claims that overstate contestability of the stated order while avoiding details that could expose the claim as ordinary.", "Clara": "Clara must defend routine intake by presenting the established order as the only applicable standard w... | {"Ben": "Ben must press for special acknowledgment by directly disputing the receptionist's explanation and treating the service order as negotiable in Ben's favor despite resistance.", "Clara": "Clara must position the dispute as a procedural issue to be resolved by reaffirming intake rules and desk authority rather t... | {"Ben": "Ben must watch for Clara's interruptions, reframing, tightened posture, fixed gaze, or dismissive delivery and respond by escalating specificity or public challenge, but pause or soften if Leo's support weakens or the counter stance hardens further.", "Clara": "Clara must monitor Ben's insistence, Leo's agreem... | {"Ben": "Ben's challenge results in a public exchange where Clara explicitly has to address Ben's claim to quicker attention and Leo's supporting remarks make the service order appear openly contestable rather than automatically fixed.", "Clara": "Clara's replies result in Ben and Leo having to engage on Clara's stated... | {"Ben": {"belief": "He believes the front desk is not treating his case with enough urgency and that the stated order of service can be contested in this public exchange.", "desire": "He wants acknowledgment that his case should receive quicker attention than the current queue allows.", "intention": "He commits to chal... | images/scenario_056/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_01.jpg", "Clara": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_02.jpg", "Leo": "images/scenario_056/individual/character_03.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_18 | scenario_009 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Ethan; Lila | At a café table, Ethan tries to turn a passing exchange into an agreed plan by explaining why it would make sense for him to come to the laundromat that evening. Lila challenges both his reason and the terms of the idea, and the conversation ends with only a tentative agreement to meet there around seven. | {"Ethan": "Proponent", "Lila": "Respondent"} | {"Ethan": "Honest Signaling", "Lila": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ethan": "Collaborating", "Lila": "Competing"} | {"Ethan": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "student"}, "Lila": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "laundromat attendant"}} | {"Ethan": "Neutral", "Lila": "Neutral"} | {"Ethan": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Ethan at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Lila": "There are no clear facial affect cues available for Lila at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ethan": "Ethan must state his reason for coming to the laundromat and the meeting terms plainly and consistently, without omitting qualifiers that show he is seeking Lila's acceptance rather than assuming it.", "Lila": "Lila must state directly which parts of Ethan's reason or proposed terms are insufficient or accep... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must frame the plan as a workable arrangement shaped by both Ethan's reason and Lila's conditions, showing collaboration instead of pressing for unilateral approval.", "Lila": "Lila must keep control of the exchange by testing Ethan's rationale and setting bounded terms that favor Lila's conditions ove... | {"Ethan": "Ethan must track Lila's challenges, hesitation, interruptions, gaze shifts, and posture changes, then slow down, clarify, or narrow the proposal when those signals indicate resistance.", "Lila": "Lila must monitor Ethan's wording, reframing attempts, pauses, gaze, and body tension, then intensify questioning... | {"Ethan": "Ethan and Lila end the exchange with Lila verbally allowing a roughly seven o'clock laundromat meeting under limits Lila has stated, after Ethan's plain justification and visible adjustment to Lila's challenges produce a tentative arrangement that both acknowledge.", "Lila": "Lila and Ethan end the exchange ... | {"Ethan": {"belief": "Lila has not yet accepted his presence at the laundromat and is evaluating whether his stated reason for coming is appropriate.", "desire": "To secure Lila's agreement that he can meet her at the laundromat later that evening under terms she accepts.", "intention": "To justify his participation cl... | images/scenario_009/group_labeled.png | {"Ethan": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_01.jpg", "Lila": "images/scenario_009/individual/character_02.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_19 | scenario_057 | medium | Information-seeking | 2 | Elena; Ben | In the busy laundromat, Ben explains to Elena how laundry should be sorted, using the detergent box as part of his guidance near the washers and dryers. As Elena checks individual items and asks where each belongs, their exchange stays focused on reaching a clear classification of whites, colors, and delicates. | {"Ben": "Answerer", "Elena": "Questioner"} | {"Ben": "Suppression", "Elena": "Exaggeration"} | {"Ben": "Compromising", "Elena": "Competing"} | {"Ben": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Compromising", "expression style": "Suppression", "gender": "male", "occupation": "office worker"}, "Elena": {"age": "late 20s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Exaggeration", "gender": "female", "occupation": "graphic designer"}} | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Ben at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available for Elena at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben should keep guidance concise and partially implicit by using the detergent box and short category labels instead of fully stating every rule unless Elena's questions require more detail.", "Elena": "Elena should amplify the uncertainty or importance of borderline items in questions to Ben so Ben gives expl... | {"Ben": "Ben should aim for workable agreement by offering practical category decisions and accepting limited clarification requests so the sorting can be settled efficiently.", "Elena": "Elena should press for decisive item-by-item classifications and challenge vague guidance until Ben commits to an acceptable sorting... | {"Ben": "Ben should monitor Elena's agreement, repeated questioning, interruptions, item-checking pace, gaze direction, and tension cues, then adjust detail level, slow or speed the explanation, and restate categories more plainly when signals show the guidance is not landing.", "Elena": "Elena should watch for Ben's h... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena arrive at a shared sorting result in which Ben's concise guidance and practical clarifications lead Elena to accept category decisions for the checked items, and both participants display through their dialogue, pacing of questions, and observable attention to the detergent box and laundry piles ... | {"Ben": {"belief": "Elena is depending on his explanation to understand how to sort her laundry, and the immediate issue is deciding where specific items belong.", "desire": "To provide sorting guidance that Elena can follow and that fits the laundromat's shared-use expectations.", "intention": "To keep the conversatio... | images/scenario_057/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_057/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_057/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
agentviss_medium_20 | scenario_010 | medium | Persuasion | 2 | Elena; Ben | Near the bar beside a brick interior wall, Elena and Ben stop after noticing an intimate moment at a nearby table. In the crowded restaurant, Elena argues that the behavior crosses a public boundary, while Ben insists it remains acceptable, and their disagreement ends with a visible break in accord as she leaves. | {"Ben": "Respondent", "Elena": "Proponent"} | {"Ben": "Honest Signaling", "Elena": "Honest Signaling"} | {"Ben": "Competing", "Elena": "Collaborating"} | {"Ben": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Competing", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "male", "occupation": "marketing professional"}, "Elena": {"age": "early 30s", "characteristics": "Collaborating", "expression style": "Honest Signaling", "gender": "female", "occupation": "hospitality worker"... | {"Ben": "Neutral", "Elena": "Neutral"} | {"Ben": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue.", "Elena": "No clear facial affect cues are available at the beginning of the dialogue."} | {"Ben": "Ben states plainly that the nearby intimate moment does not merit criticism in this setting and avoids hedging or concealing his interpretation so Elena can directly contest it.", "Elena": "Elena states directly that the nearby behavior is visible enough to affect others and avoids softening or hiding her stan... | {"Ben": "Ben prioritizes defending his own interpretation by challenging Elena's claim and maintaining that the behavior is acceptable despite the relational cost of open disagreement.", "Elena": "Elena frames the disagreement as a shared standard-setting problem and presses Ben to acknowledge her view while keeping th... | {"Ben": "Ben watches Elena for agreement, interruption, rigid posture, narrowed gaze, or turning away and adjusts by intensifying his defense, reframing the situation as harmless, or shortening his replies when Elena disengages.", "Elena": "Elena monitors Ben for interruption, hesitation, reframing, gaze shifts, or pos... | {"Ben": "Ben and Elena end the exchange with Ben plainly upholding the nearby behavior as acceptable, Elena explicitly rejecting that interpretation as inappropriate for the restaurant, and Elena leaving after visible disengagement confirms a break in accord.", "Elena": "Elena and Ben end the exchange with Ben still de... | {"Ben": {"belief": "The nearby intimate moment does not warrant criticism in the restaurant context, and Elena is judging it too harshly.", "desire": "To have his defense of the behavior accepted as a legitimate interpretation of the situation.", "intention": "To continue contesting Elena's claim and uphold his interpr... | images/scenario_010/group_labeled.png | {"Ben": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_02.jpg", "Elena": "images/scenario_010/individual/character_01.jpg"} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.