Dataset Viewer
The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Cannot get the split names for the config 'default' of the dataset.
Exception:    SplitsNotFoundError
Message:      The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
                  for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 80, in _split_generators
                  raise ValueError(
                  ...<2 lines>...
                  )
              ValueError: The TAR archives of the dataset should be in WebDataset format, but the files in the archive don't share the same prefix or the same types.
              
              The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 68, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
                  for split in get_dataset_split_names(
                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      path=dataset,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      config_name=config,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      token=hf_token,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
                  info = get_dataset_config_info(
                      path,
                  ...<6 lines>...
                      **config_kwargs,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
                  raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
              datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

πŸ•΅οΈ Lies We Can See β€” Dataset

Data for the paper Lies We Can See: Joint Verbal and Non-Verbal Deception by VLM Agents in Embodied Social Interactions.

MINEAMONGUS is a 3D multimodal Among Us sandbox in Minecraft where imposter agents deceive crewmates through both what they say and what they do β€” stalking a target, checking for witnesses, fleeing an unreported body, then accusing the crewmate who found it. ARIA is the configurable VLM-agent harness that runs them. This repository holds the RQ2 artifacts: the cross-VLM tournament game data, the crewmate behavior-cloning training set, and the LLM-as-a-judge deception-atom scoring.

Code / environment: https://github.com/JunseoKim0103/Lies-We-Can-See Private / research use.

πŸ“‚ Contents

lies-we-can-see/
β”œβ”€β”€ RQ2_train/                     # cross-VLM tournament games + crewmate SFT data
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ case1A.tar … case2B.tar    #   576 raw game runs (logs, traces, frames)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ all_runs.csv / .json       #   per-run aggregate results
β”‚   └── sft_used/                  #   crewmate detection SFT data (ShareGPT)
└── RQ2_llm_as_a_judge/            # deception-atom scoring of top-3/worst-3 imposters
    β”œβ”€β”€ input.tar                  #   576 judged games (judge inputs) + _index.csv
    └── output/                    #   per-game findings + analysis / paper results

RQ2_train/

The RQ2 cross-VLM tournament: every VLM backbone plays imposter against every other across four ARIA configurations (Case 1A/1B/2A/2B).

Raw games β€” caseXX.tar

One tar per case, 144 matchups each (576 games total). Each game has 8 players and full per-game artifacts:

caseXX/trial1/matchupMM/<YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS>/
    game.log, main.log, <Player>.log, agents.yaml, token_usage.txt
    <Player>/trace.json                 # structured per-decision ARIA trace
    <Player>/images/*.jpeg | *.png      # first-person frames
File Case matchups
case1A.tar 1A 144
case1B.tar 1B 144
case2A.tar 2A 144
case2B.tar 2B 144
total 576

Detection training data β€” sft_used/

Supervised fine-tuning samples for the crewmate deception detector (behavior cloning): every ARIA crewmate call from games the crewmate wins. Each call is an (X, S, Y) example β€” text prompt X, optional egocentric RGB state S, VLM response Y β€” spanning all crewmate decision surfaces (planning, memory, reflection, skill memory, and the REPORT / SURVEILLANCE / EMERGENCY / MEETING / VOTE / MOVE / MISSION modules). A subset carry an image; the rest are text-only.

File Samples
detection_train.jsonl 13,836
detection_val.jsonl 874
dataset_info.json LLaMA-Factory registration (ShareGPT messages + images)

Images. Paths in the images field are repo-relative β€” extract the case tars inside RQ2_train/ and they resolve:

cd RQ2_train && for t in case*.tar; do tar -xf "$t"; done

Recipe. Base model Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B, LoRA (rank 16, Ξ± 32, dropout 0.05, vision tower frozen), AdamW lr 1e-4 cosine (0.05 warmup), batch 8, 2 epochs, bf16, qwen2-vl chat template, 4,096-token cutoff, trained in LLaMA-Factory.

⚠️ Evaluation β€” avoid identity contamination

In this data the impostors are always James and Olivia (fixed name ↔ color ↔ role pairings), so a model fine-tuned on it can learn a name/color shortcut instead of reading behavior. When you evaluate such a model, change the impostor identities in the environment setup (e.g. make Steve and Jason the impostors) so the shortcut cannot fire.


RQ2_llm_as_a_judge/

LLM-as-a-judge scoring of deception atoms for the imposters with the highest / lowest win rates. Self-contained β€” it carries its own judge input logs.

  • 576 judged games = 6 imposter models Γ— 96 games, case-balanced (Case 1A/1B/2A/2B Γ— 144; each case trial1/trial2 Γ— 72). File prefixes top- / worst-.
  • Judge: qwen3.6-27b-thinking, two-pass (pass1 non-verbal atoms, pass2 verbal / meeting transcript), noise-filtered, imposter-only.
  • top-3 = gemini-3-flash-preview, kimi-k2.5, gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
  • worst-3 = qwen3.5-9b, gemma4-26b-a4b, gemini-2.5-flash
RQ2_llm_as_a_judge/
β”œβ”€β”€ input.tar          # judge inputs (game logs) β€” tar -xf β†’ input/
β”œβ”€β”€ _index.csv         # one row per judged game (case, trial, matchup, rank, models, …)
└── output/
    β”œβ”€β”€ findings_per_run.tar          # 576 Γ— 2-pass *.findings.json (atom labels)
    β”œβ”€β”€ paper_rq2_quantitative.md     # the paper's RQ2 numbers
    β”œβ”€β”€ atom_top3_vs_worst3.md, atom_correlation_with_imp_wr.md, atom_diversity.md
    └── atom_*.csv, schedule.json, runner.log, console.log

Do not confuse the judge model (qwen3.6-27b-thinking) with the players' models that appear in the logs.


Intended use

For research on agent deception and alignment. The deceptive behaviors here are the object of study, not a capability to deploy.

Citation

@misc{mineamongus2026,
  title  = {Lies We Can See: Joint Verbal and Non-Verbal Deception
            by VLM Agents in Embodied Social Interactions},
  note   = {Under review},
  year   = {2026}
}
Downloads last month
9