Datasets:
text stringlengths 5.91k 25k | arxiv_id stringlengths 10 10 | url stringlengths 32 32 | timestamp stringdate 2020-07-29 02:22:50 2023-03-06 02:13:47 | yymm stringdate 2007-01-01 00:00:00 2302-01-01 00:00:00 | language stringclasses 2
values | token_count int64 4.1k 4.1k | uuid stringlengths 36 36 | start_index int64 0 706k | input_ids list | start_char int64 0 706k | eff_start_char int64 0 706k | ancestor_start_index int64 0 249k | anchor stringclasses 3
values | end_pad_count int64 0 240 | ancestor_char_len int64 4.1k 24.5k | target_char_len int64 5.91k 25k | char_iou float64 0.45 1 | end_drift int64 -73 5.55k | start_shift_chars int64 0 2.67k | nudged int64 0 0 | reencode_ok bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\ell_\tau(y_i - {\bf x}_i^{\top}\... | 2112.06134 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06134 | 2021-12-14 02:17:21 | 2112 | en | 4,096 | 3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b | 14,478 | [
369,
264,
8521,
6205,
1404,
400,
77,
13244,
763,
15325,
11,
220,
584,
1176,
9067,
59060,
30243,
3,
304,
264,
13579,
2134,
323,
3373,
279,
23669,
907,
1243,
4184,
311,
279,
17832,
6912,
36,
12717,
13,
220,
4740,
38938,
59060,
30243,
55... | 14,478 | 14,478 | 4,024 | start | 0 | 12,455 | 12,535 | 0.993618 | 80 | 0 | 0 | true |
the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\textup{igno}}$ as:
\begin{align}
\tau_{\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\
\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\textup{igno}} &\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].
\end{align}
Below, we use the result in Corollary \ref{cor:TVD} to bound the average tr... | 2107.04661 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04661 | 2021-07-13 02:02:31 | 2107 | en | 4,096 | bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7 | 8,824 | [
279,
5335,
25745,
6514,
2515,
16430,
59060,
30243,
48922,
83,
62,
16,
14287,
62,
17,
52635,
59,
1342,
455,
90,
625,
78,
3500,
3,
439,
512,
59,
7413,
90,
6750,
534,
262,
1144,
30243,
15511,
59,
1342,
455,
90,
2390,
3500,
48922,
83,
... | 8,824 | 8,824 | 2,872 | start | 0 | 12,896 | 13,012 | 0.991085 | 116 | 0 | 0 | true |
estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to
\[ Z_1 = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc}
2 & \mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\
-2 & \mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\
0 & \mathrm{otherwise.}
\end{array} \right.
\]
Observing $Z_1=2$ and $Z_1=-2$ involve an interesting interpretation ... | 2105.05146 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05146 | 2021-05-12 02:28:25 | 2105 | en | 4,096 | 06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33 | 299,918 | [
16430,
315,
279,
97547,
13,
763,
1057,
1162,
11,
449,
400,
68,
11781,
10590,
13536,
865,
8,
284,
220,
16,
14,
17,
55976,
400,
57,
62,
16,
3,
15858,
9803,
311,
271,
79145,
1901,
62,
16,
284,
1144,
2414,
59,
90,
1144,
7413,
90,
16... | 299,918 | 299,918 | 85,893 | start | 0 | 11,178 | 11,254 | 0.993247 | 76 | 0 | 0 | true |
$21.91 & 70.52$\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\ \hline
VGG & 73.02$\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\ \hline
ResNet& 81.39$\pm$17.19 & 80.87$\pm$18.08 & -0.87 & 78.01$\pm$19... | 2007.15951 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15951 | 2020-08-03 02:11:24 | 2007 | en | 4,096 | 0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9 | 50,395 | [
3,
1691,
13,
5925,
612,
220,
2031,
13,
4103,
59836,
5298,
3,
1691,
13,
3080,
612,
220,
16,
13,
2131,
612,
220,
3076,
13,
1032,
59836,
5298,
3,
1691,
13,
2031,
612,
482,
16,
13,
2721,
9,
612,
220,
2031,
13,
1187,
59836,
5298,
3,
... | 50,395 | 50,395 | 12,600 | start | 0 | 9,645 | 11,350 | 0.84978 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | true |
G\}$ where $G = {\cal A}({\mathbb R}^2)\times {\cal A}({\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\em contrast transformations}. These include small translation... | 2106.13870 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.13870 | 2021-06-29 02:03:47 | 2106 | en | 4,096 | 2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316 | 22,092 | [
480,
59,
32816,
1405,
400,
38,
284,
29252,
5531,
362,
92,
2358,
59,
10590,
6194,
432,
92,
61,
17,
10929,
15487,
29252,
5531,
362,
92,
2358,
59,
10590,
6194,
432,
5525,
3,
374,
279,
1912,
315,
1422,
1897,
316,
16751,
13978,
315,
279,... | 22,092 | 22,092 | 5,076 | start | 0 | 14,250 | 14,955 | 0.952859 | 705 | 0 | 0 | true |
$G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\pi=[\pi_1\cdots \pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability distribution vector $\pi$ is a... | 2302.14596 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14596 | 2023-03-01 02:18:27 | 2302 | en | 4,096 | fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2 | 16,515 | [
400,
38,
3,
15151,
279,
19463,
505,
832,
45710,
311,
2500,
45710,
323,
374,
1990,
220,
15,
323,
220,
16,
13,
578,
2694,
315,
279,
5540,
304,
1855,
2872,
374,
6273,
311,
832,
13,
6914,
59060,
2554,
5941,
59,
2554,
62,
16,
59,
4484,... | 16,515 | 16,515 | 4,532 | start | 0 | 16,135 | 16,399 | 0.983901 | 264 | 0 | 0 | true |
"16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wire(...TRUNCATED) | 2202.11699 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11699 | 2022-02-24 02:24:08 | 2202 | en | 4,096 | 3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726 | 20,675 | [845,59,92,26033,1144,71,1074,198,59,1342,13536,90,38945,1752,13740,92,612,34438,26228,449,220,20,73(...TRUNCATED) | 20,675 | 20,675 | 6,982 | start | 0 | 13,131 | 13,441 | 0.976936 | 310 | 0 | 0 | true |
"Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\(...TRUNCATED) | 2112.14949 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14949 | 2022-01-03 02:07:23 | 2112 | en | 4,096 | c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd | 692 | [626,4843,301,7285,20,1613,197,8370,374,3453,9437,555,59060,10590,5531,90,50,52635,77,7385,92,284,11(...TRUNCATED) | 692 | 692 | 226 | start | 0 | 15,029 | 15,386 | 0.976797 | 357 | 0 | 0 | true |
" to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed (...TRUNCATED) | 2008.01761 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01761 | 2020-09-22 02:22:52 | 2008 | en | 4,096 | babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3 | 16,666 | [311,11,389,5578,11,264,1633,2678,8844,2349,304,279,14661,315,400,44,3,323,400,44,45801,902,649,387,(...TRUNCATED) | 16,666 | 16,666 | 3,999 | start | 0 | 17,313 | 17,608 | 0.983246 | 295 | 0 | 0 | true |
"4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetr(...TRUNCATED) | 2202.04912 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04912 | 2022-02-11 02:11:15 | 2202 | en | 4,096 | dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180 | 45,225 | [19,30721,7,32,23,8,220,3412,11,220,323,279,2939,10379,4842,295,12690,220,527,59060,7288,3,12,23108,(...TRUNCATED) | 45,225 | 45,225 | 14,646 | start | 0 | 11,489 | 11,627 | 0.988131 | 138 | 0 | 0 | true |
statML-arxiv-40M-20M-olmo3
An OLMo 3-tokenized re-windowing of JackHsieh/statML-arxiv-40M-20M
(originally tokenized with Qwen3). Each row is a contiguous span of exactly 4096 tokens under the OLMo 3
tokenizer (allenai/Olmo-3-1025-7B, vocab 100 278), built to be as close as possible to the
corresponding Qwen3 window of the same paper so the two corpora are comparable across tokenizers. The schema
mirrors the ancestor dataset (leading columns), followed by re-windowing/difference metrics.
- train: 9,728 sequences (39.8M tokens) · test: 4,864 sequences (19.9M tokens)
- Same papers (matched by
uuid) and same train/test split as the Qwen3 version.
How it was built
Ancestor: the raw full-text papers in JackHsieh/statML-arxiv.
For each row of the Qwen3 dataset:
- Same start (character offset). The Qwen3 window's start (a token index) is mapped to a character
offset in the paper; the OLMo window begins there. Since 4096 Qwen tokens ≠ 4096 OLMo tokens of text, the
window end drifts. (
start_indexin this dataset is that character offset.) - Exactly 4096 OLMo tokens from the offset, with a decode→re-encode==4096 check (minimal end-nudge; a
raw-ids fallback flagged by
reencode_ok=Falsein the rare case it can't be met). - Shortfall → end-anchor. If the paper is too short after the offset, the window is shifted earlier and
anchored to the paper's final 4096 OLMo tokens (
anchor="end"). - Whole paper < 4096 OLMo tokens → right-pad** with
<|extra_id_10|>(id 100 275) up to 4096. **These fill tokens are genuine, non-masked tokens** — a reserved sentinel chosen so it is never confused with<|pad|>. Padded rows have **end_pad_count > 0.
Reproduce (tokenizer-agnostic; same script serves the planned Llama port):
python -m prestar_prep.retokenize.rewindow_documents \
--ancestor-tokenizer Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 \
--target-tokenizer allenai/Olmo-3-1025-7B \
--fill-token "<|extra_id_10|>" --num-proc 16 --out-dir <out>
Schema
Leading columns (mirror the ancestor statML-arxiv-40M-20M):
| column | type | meaning |
|---|---|---|
text |
str | decoded OLMo window text |
arxiv_id, url, timestamp, yymm, language |
str | per-paper metadata (joined by uuid) |
token_count |
int64 | window length in tokens (4096, for schema parity) |
uuid |
str | paper id; matches the ancestor + Qwen3 datasets |
start_index |
int64 | character offset in the paper where the window begins |
input_ids |
list[int] | the 4096 OLMo-3 token ids (what training consumes) |
Auxiliary re-windowing metrics (appended):
| column | meaning |
|---|---|
start_char / eff_start_char |
original vs. actual char-offset anchor (differ only when end-anchored) |
ancestor_start_index |
the original Qwen3 token start_index |
anchor |
start · end (shortfall) · pad (short paper) |
end_pad_count |
fill tokens appended (> 0 ⇒ padded; genuine, non-masked) |
ancestor_char_len / target_char_len |
char length of the Qwen vs OLMo window |
char_iou, end_drift, start_shift_chars, nudged, reencode_ok |
per-window difference/provenance |
Difference from the Qwen3 windows
| metric | train | test |
|---|---|---|
| char-span IoU (mean / min) | 0.980 / 0.447 | 0.980 / 0.595 |
| end-drift mean (chars) | 271 | 275 |
| end-anchored (shortfall) | 1.54% | 1.73% |
end-padded (end_pad_count>0) |
12 | 3 |
| re-encode fallback | 0.16% | 0.19% |
Windows sharing the same start with the Qwen3 corpus overlap ~98% of their character span; the OLMo window extends a few hundred characters further on average (OLMo needs slightly more text per 4096 tokens on this math-heavy content).
- Downloads last month
- 72