You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

CASTER-Bench

CASTER-Bench is a human-annotated multimodal benchmark for Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance (CASTER) — a task that evaluates whether User-Generated Content (UGC) achieves positive community resonance, going beyond traditional aesthetic-focused Video Quality Assessment (VQA).

This benchmark is introduced in the ACL 2026 paper: "Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance: A Human-Centric Perspective on User-Generated Content Evaluation".

Motivation

Traditional VQA focuses on pixel-level integrity and low-level visual cues, which fails to capture how quality is actually perceived on UGC platforms. CASTER redefines UGC quality through the lens of social reasoning — assessing whether content elicits genuine community resonance based on its multimodal attributes (title, tags, video content, cover image) rather than visual quality alone.

Dataset Description

CASTER-Bench contains 1,485 long-form UGC videos (average duration: 442 seconds, total: 182.5 hours) sourced from Bilibili, covering 30 major content categories with balanced representation. Unlike existing VQA datasets that rely on short clips (8-10s), CASTER-Bench enables evaluation of narrative coherence, information density, and sustained engagement.

Key Features

  • Long-form videos: Average 442s duration (vs. 8-20s in prior VQA benchmarks)
  • Rich multimodal signals: Title, tags, video content, cover image, category metadata
  • Expert annotations: Labeled by trained content moderators using a human-centered rubric grounded in real community feedback
  • Diverse categories: 30 top-level categories, 166 sub-categories

Quality Label Distribution

Label Chinese Count Percentage
Excellent 158 10.6%
Good 253 17.0%
Average 573 38.6%
Poor 501 33.7%

This distribution mirrors real-world platforms, presenting a realistic challenge for identifying high-quality content amidst massive amounts of average data.

Categories

Gaming, Knowledge, Entertainment, Vlog, Food, Music, Dance, Sports, Fitness, Animals, Anime & Manga, Film & TV, Fashion & Beauty, Tech & Digital, Automotive, Travel, Agriculture, Parenting, Healthcare, Handicrafts, Painting, Home & Property, Short Skits, Relationship, Outdoor, Meme Video, Mysticism, Artificial Intelligence, Hobbies, Life Tips

Dataset Structure

CASTER-Bench/
├── README.md
├── CASTER_Bench.json    # Annotations (1,485 entries)
├── cover.zip            # Video cover images
└── video.zip            # Video files

Annotation Format

Each entry in CASTER_Bench.json:

{
  "archive_title": "Video title",
  "tag": "Comma-separated content tags",
  "new_tid_name": "Top-level category",
  "new_sub_tid_name": "Sub-category",
  "video_path": "video/xxxxx.mp4",
  "cover_path": "cover/xxxxx.jpg",
  "human_label": "优/良/中/差"
}

Usage

import json
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download

# Download annotations
path = hf_hub_download(repo_id="IndexTeam/CASTER-Bench", filename="CASTER_Bench.json", repo_type="dataset")
with open(path) as f:
    data = json.load(f)

# Download videos and covers
video_zip = hf_hub_download(repo_id="IndexTeam/CASTER-Bench", filename="video.zip", repo_type="dataset")
cover_zip = hf_hub_download(repo_id="IndexTeam/CASTER-Bench", filename="cover.zip", repo_type="dataset")

Comparison with Existing Benchmarks

Dataset Videos Avg Duration Total Duration Focus Modality
KoNViD-1k 1,200 8s 2.7h Aesthetic & Technical Video Only
LIVE-VQC 585 10s 1.6h Aesthetic & Technical Video Only
YouTube-UGC 1,380 20s 7.7h Aesthetic & Technical Video Only
FineVD 6,104 8s 13.6h Aesthetic & Technical Video Only
CASTER-Bench 1,485 442s 182.5h Social & Content Title+Tags+Cover+Video

Citation

@inproceedings{li2026caster,
  title={Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance: A Human-Centric Perspective on User-Generated Content Evaluation},
  author={Li, Tianjiao and Zhao, Kai and Li, Xiang and Liu, Yang and Sun, Huyang},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)},
  year={2026}
}

License

This dataset is released under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Downloads last month
11