The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 81, in _split_generators
first_examples = list(islice(pipeline, self.NUM_EXAMPLES_FOR_FEATURES_INFERENCE))
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 32, in _get_pipeline_from_tar
fs: fsspec.AbstractFileSystem = fsspec.filesystem("memory")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 302, in filesystem
cls = get_filesystem_class(protocol)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 239, in get_filesystem_class
raise ValueError(f"Protocol not known: {protocol}")
ValueError: Protocol not known: memory
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 66, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
PowerDiT Dataset
This repository contains processed power-system graph data for machine learning experiments on power-flow- and optimal-power-flow-related tasks.
The data is generated with gridfm-datakit based on benchmark grid cases from PGLib, and then preprocessed into graph-structured samples.
It is intended to be stored in the folders examples/data_processed/pf and examples/data_processed/opf.
Overview
The dataset consists of graph representations of electric power systems under a range of operating conditions and perturbations.
Each sample corresponds to a power-grid state derived from a benchmark network case, with:
- nodes representing buses
- edges representing transmission lines
- node features encoding electrical state, bus metadata, and generator properties.
- edge features encoding electrical line parameters.
The data is split into two different datasets:
PF mode (Power Flow)
The samples are merely physically (power-flow) consistent with non-cost-optimal generations.OPF mode (Optimal Power Flow)
The samples are creating using an opf-solver such that generator setpoints are cost-optimal.
Available data
The processed dataset currently includes the following grid cases and sample counts:
| grid | #buses | #gens | #lines | pf samples | opf samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| case3_lmbd | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1,224,988 | 934,045 |
| case5_pjm | 5 | 5 | 12 | 1,287,400 | 1,214,688 |
| case14_ieee | 14 | 5 | 40 | 1,290,095 | 1,300,186 |
| case24_ieee_rts | 24 | 33 | 76 | 1,290,126 | 1,301,982 |
| case30_ieee | 30 | 6 | 82 | 1,300,680 | 1,296,767 |
| case30_as | 30 | 6 | 82 | 1,300,200 | 1,284,562 |
| case39_epri | 39 | 10 | 92 | 1,300,211 | 1,301,635 |
| case57_ieee | 57 | 7 | 160 | 1,301,222 | 1,273,026 |
| case60_c | 60 | 23 | 176 | 1,302,069 | 1,300,858 |
| case73_ieee_rts | 73 | 99 | 240 | 1,300,405 | 1,301,531 |
| case89_pegase | 89 | 12 | 420 | 654,591 | 1,483,225 |
| case118_ieee | 118 | 54 | 372 | 1,300,742 | 1,301,781 |
| case162_ieee_dtc | 162 | 12 | 568 | 1,046,318 | 181,038 |
| case179_goc | 179 | 29 | 526 | 1,293,617 | 739,821 |
| case197_snem | 197 | 35 | 572 | 1,301,323 | 1,391,101 |
| case200_activ | 200 | 49 | 490 | 1,301,480 | 1,320,560 |
| case240_pserc | 240 | 143 | 896 | 1,011,541 | 260,102 |
| case300_ieee | 300 | 69 | 822 | 1,067,772 | 625,028 |
| case500_goc | 500 | 224 | 1,466 | 1,018,707 | 543,710 |
| case588_sdet | 588 | 167 | 1,372 | 1,427,568 | 622,209 |
| case793_goc | 793 | 214 | 1,826 | 1,414,878 | 405,521 |
What the data consists of
At a high level, the dataset contains:
- benchmark power-grid topologies
- sampled and perturbed operating conditions
- simulated physical solutions
- graph-structured representations for ML
Node features
| # | Feature | Name | PF-PQ | PF-PV | PF-REF | OPF-PQ | OPF-PV | OPF-REF | SE-PQ | SE-PV | SE-REF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | P_d | Active load demand | I | I | I | I | I | I | M | M | M |
| 1 | Q_d | Reactive load demand | I | I | I | I | I | I | M | M | M |
| 2 | Q_g | Reactive generation | I | O | O | I | O | O | M | M | M |
| 3 | V_m | Voltage magnitude | O | I | O | O | O | O | M | M | M |
| 4 | V_a | Voltage angle | O | O | I | O | O | I | O | O | O |
| 5 | PQ flag | PQ bus indicator | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 6 | PV flag | PV bus indicator | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 7 | REF flag | Slack bus indicator | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 8 | V_m^min | Min. voltage magnitude | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 9 | V_m^max | Max. voltage magnitude | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 10 | Q_g^min | Min. reactive generation | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 11 | Q_g^max | Max. reactive generation | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 12 | G_s | Shunt conductance | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 13 | B_s | Shunt susceptance | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| 14 | V_n (kV) | Nominal voltage | -- | -- | -- | I | I | I | I | I | I |
Generator features
| # | Feature | Name | PF-PQ/PV | PF-REF | OPF | State Est. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | P_g | Active generation | I | O | O | M |
| 1 | P_g^min | Min. active generation | -- | -- | I | I |
| 2 | P_g^max | Max. active generation | -- | -- | I | I |
| 3 | c_0 | Cost constant term | -- | -- | I | I |
| 4 | c_1 | Cost linear coefficient | -- | -- | I | I |
| 5 | c_2 | Cost quadratic coefficient | -- | -- | I | I |
Edge features
| # | Feature | Name | Power Flow | OPF | State Est. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | P_e | Active power flow | O | O | M |
| 1 | Q_e | Reactive power flow | O | O | M |
| 2 | Y_ff,r | From-from admittance (real) | I | I | I |
| 3 | Y_ff,i | From-from admittance (imag.) | I | I | I |
| 4 | Y_ft,r | From-to admittance (real) | I | I | I |
| 5 | Y_ft,i | From-to admittance (imag.) | I | I | I |
| 6 | tap | Transformer tap ratio | I | I | I |
| 7 | theta_min | Min. angle difference | -- | I | I |
| 8 | theta_max | Max. angle difference | -- | I | I |
| 9 | rate_A | Thermal rating (MVA) | -- | I | I |
- I = input feature
- O = output / target feature
- M = measured feature
- -- = not used
Data source
The samples have been generated using Gridfm-datakit on the Future Technologies Partition on four intel sapphire rapids nodes. The underlying network cases (topologies and initial load and generation profiles) are based on PGLib benchmark systems, the perturbation framework is Gridfm-datakit. The preprocessing from Gridfm-graphkit has been adapted to allow for larger dataset sizes.
Perturbations applied during data generation
The data generation process in gridfm-datakit applies perturbations to create diverse operating conditions and topologies.
The perturbation types include:
1. Load perturbations
Load levels are randomly varied using a global scaling factor and local noise.
2. Topology and admittance perturbations
N-k perturbations are used to randomly cut off buses or edges. We used k=1. Further, the resistance and reactance parameters are randomly scaled during the perturbation process.
3. Generation perturbations
The generators are perturbed by changing their cost coefficients. In OPF-mode, the generator setpoints are recalculated with an opf-solver after topology and load perturbations have been applied. In PF-mode, an OPF-solver is only used BEFORE the perturbations.
Preprocessing
The raw power-system scenarios are preprocessed into a disk-backed heterogeneous graph format for efficient training and random access.
Raw inputs
The preprocessing pipeline starts from three parquet tables per dataset split:
bus_data.parquetgen_data.parquetbranch_data.parquet
Each row belongs to a specific scenario, and each scenario corresponds to one graph sample.
Scenario validation and filtering
Before graph construction, scenarios are validated for structural consistency.
In particular, scenarios are removed if their bus indices are invalid, i.e. if:
- bus IDs are duplicated, or
- bus IDs are not consecutive from
0toN-1
This ensures that each scenario can be converted into a well-formed graph with a consistent node indexing scheme.
Feature extraction
The preprocessing selects fixed feature subsets for buses, generators, and branches.
Bus features
Bus node features include electrical state, bus type indicators, and operating constraints:
Pd,QdQg,Vm,VaPQ,PV,REFflagsmin_vm_pu,max_vm_pumin_q_mvar,max_q_mvarGS,BSvn_kv
Generator features
Generator node features include operating quantities and cost parameters:
p_mwmin_p_mw,max_p_mwcp0_eur,cp1_eur_per_mw,cp2_eur_per_mw2in_service
Branch features
Branch edge features include power-flow quantities, admittance terms, and branch constraints.
For each physical branch, the preprocessing creates two directed edges:
- one forward edge (
from_bus -> to_bus) - one reverse edge (
to_bus -> from_bus)
The forward and reverse edges receive direction-specific attributes, e.g.:
- forward:
pf,qf,Yff_*,Yft_* - reverse:
pt,qt,Ytt_*,Ytf_*
Shared branch attributes include:
tapang_min,ang_maxrate_abr_status
Bus-level aggregation of generator limits
Reactive power limits from generators are aggregated onto buses before graph construction.
For each (scenario, bus), the preprocessing sums:
min_q_mvarmax_q_mvar
across all generators connected to that bus, and merges these totals into the bus feature table.
This enriches bus nodes with bus-level reactive capability information.
Target construction
Task labels are derived from subsets of the selected features.
- Bus targets are taken from the leading subset of bus features
- Generator targets are taken from the leading subset of generator features
- Branch targets are stored separately as edge-level flow quantities
The exact interpretation of inputs and outputs depends on the downstream task (e.g. PF, OPF, state estimation, reconstruction).
Heterogeneous graph construction
Each scenario is converted into a HeteroData graph with:
- bus nodes
- generator nodes
- bus-to-bus edges for physical branches
- generator-to-bus edges
- bus-to-generator edges
This yields a heterogeneous graph representation that preserves both the electrical network structure and generator attachment structure.
Storage format
Instead of storing one file per scenario, the processed dataset is written into a small number of large NumPy memory-mapped arrays (memmap).
This avoids metadata overhead on large cluster file systems and enables efficient random access.
The processed directory contains arrays such as:
bus_x.npy,bus_y.npygen_x.npy,gen_y.npyedge_index.npy,edge_attr.npy,edge_y.npygen_bus_ei.npy,bus_gen_ei.npy
along with an index.pt file containing per-scenario offsets.
Using these offsets, a single scenario can be loaded without materializing the full dataset in memory.
Runtime loading and normalization
When a sample is accessed:
- the corresponding slices are read from the memmap arrays,
- a PyTorch Geometric
HeteroDataobject is reconstructed, - edge indices are converted into PyG format,
- feature normalization is applied at access time.
Normalization is therefore not baked into the stored arrays, but applied dynamically during dataset loading.
- Downloads last month
- 718