Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1049 of 2008 ====================================================== Gaya Nand Singh son of Rajdeo Singh, residence of the village- Shambhua, P.S. Mehandia, District Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Ram Lakhan Singh, son of Late Dasrath Singh 3. Anil Kumar, son of Ramchandra Singh. 4. Manoj Singh, son of Ram Lakhan Singh, at present working at Nalkonda, Mahboob Nagar (A.P.) in J.P. Association Ltd. 5. Lal Babadur Singh son of Ramashish Singh. 6. Ramashish Singh, son of Late Kailash Singh 7. Manjas Kumar, son of Ramchandra Singh 8. Satrughan Singh @ Lalan Singh, son of Late Dasrath Singh. 9. Sujit Kumar @ Guddu Son of Ram Lakhan Singh, All are the residence of village Shambhua, P.S. Mehandia, District Arwal. .... .... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, with Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad and Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, Advocates. For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. R.B.Roy ‘Raman’, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 06-09-2012 After having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State, this Court does not find any legal infirmity or procedural irregularity in the impugned judgment dated 31st July 2008 passed in Session Trial No. 88 of 1998/ 14 of 2002 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-1 Jehanabad, acquitting the accused opposite party no. 2 to 9 for charges under [STATUTE] . Admittedly, in the present case neither the doctor nor the Investigating Officer was examined on behalf of the prosecution. Even injury report of the injured person has not been Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1049 of 2008 (4) dt.06-09-2012 2 / 2 2 brought on record and has not been marked as exhibit. In the given facts of the case, this Court is not inclined to exercise its revisional jurisdiction for setting aside and reversing the impugned judgment of acquittal. Consequently, the application fails and is, accordingly, rejected. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 147

Statute Text:
Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting. Whoever is guilty of rioting, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.