Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 39967 of 2012 ====================================================== Akindra Prasad @ Akhindra Bhagat, son of late Sita Ram Bhagat, resident of Vill. Bara Bishunpur, P.S. Rajepur, Distt. East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 2. 06-11-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2011 registered for offence punishable under [STATUTE] to which later on [STATUTE] has been added. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has clean antecedent as has been stated in paragraph-7 of the application and has been made an accused only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Ravi Shankar Prasad Yadav and is in custody since 13.06.2012. Learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to Annexures 2 and 3 of the application which are web copies of orders passed by co-ordinate benches of this Court dated 14.10.2011 in Cr. Misc. No. 33486 of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39967 of 2012 (2) dt.06-11-2012 2 2011 and order dated 17.04.2012 in Cr. Misc. No. 13536 of 2012 by which similarly situated co-accused Ravi Shankar Yadav @ Bajrangi Yadav and Arvind Kumar respectively have been granted bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is involved in the crime and thus does not deserve to be released on bail. Upon hearing learned counsels for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana, East Champaran at Motihari, in Rajepur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2011 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall attend the court regularly on each and every date till the disposal of the case and in case of failure to do so on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Anjani/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.