Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19949 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Shamim, Son of Md. Yunus. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 4 16-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary. The petitioner, who is languishing in custody, seeks bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] read with Sections 44 & 66 of I.T. Act, 2005. In this case, instituted against one Shahina Khatoon and her unknown associates relating to unauthorized withdrawal of money with held of A.T.M. card issued in the name of the named accused, who subsequently, during investigation emerged as a lady of different name and daughter of the petitioner in whose name account was opened with the help of other two co-accused against whom police has already submitted charge-sheet including the petitioner and named accused. Submission is of false implication and nothing emerging against the petitioner except he being father of account holder and alleged hacker of computer system of the bank, but even to substantiate such things till date, there is absolutely nothing, though, investigation against another son of the petitioner is kept pending. Further, petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.03.2012. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19949 of 2012 (4) dt.16-07-2012 2 / 2 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 122/2012, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. However, prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of the privilege, if at all, at any subsequent stage, anything substantially against the petitioner emerges. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.