Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35225 of 2012 ====================================================== Sanjit Kumar @ Sanjeet Singh s/o Sri Parmanand Singh r/o- Mafi, P.S.- Warsaliganj, Distt.- Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 05-09-2012 Heard. The prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner in a criminal prosecution registered under [STATUTE] was earlier rejected by this Court by order dated 22.07.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18927 of 2011 with an observation that if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within one year from the date of framing charge, then he shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. It has been asserted in the petition that charge against the petitioner was framed on 03.09.2011 and till date six prosecution witnesses have been examined, but none of them including the informant has identified the petitioner in the court. It has also been pleaded that the petitioner is under judicial custody since 22.09.2010, i.e. almost two years. In the facts and circumstances, the prayer for bail is allowed. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2010, giving rise to Session Trial No. 192 of 2011/ 42 of 2011 to the satisfaction of learned ADJ (Adhoc),IV, Nawada, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35225 of 2012 (2) dt.05-09-2012 2 / 2 2 subject to conditions that: (A) Both the bailors shall be government servant. (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.