Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23729 of 2012 (3) dt.27-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23729 of 2012 ====================================================== Jitendra Pandey @ Jitendra Kumar Pandey, son of Ram Nandan Pandey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.26359 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajesh Pandey, Rama Nandan Pandey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 27-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. These applications are being heard together and being disposed of by this common order. These applications have been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners who are in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and added [STATUTE] . Both the petitioners are named accused in this case instituted on the basis of said to be certified copy of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23729 of 2012 (3) dt.27-08-2012 fard-e-beyan of Anita Singh recorded on 18.9.2011 at P.M.C.H., Patna, stating about miseries faced by her at the instance of petitioner and other family members in this case of honour killing. Submission is of false implication and absence of very initial statement of the deceased, if at all, recorded during her life time. As is evident from the said fard-e-beyan occurrence took place on 16.9.2011, she after initial medical assistance referred to P.M.C.H., Patna, but taking into consideration her critical condition earlier statement could not be recorded. She also stated about simultaneous assault to her father-in-law Shilanath Singh, whose statement appears recorded in paragraph – 7 of the case diary, but as submitted/evident that there is no explanation for lack of any statement of this witness, if at all, he also sustained injuries during same chain of occurrence. It is submitted on the basis of autopsy report that he has found cause of death ‘asphyxia’ caused due to hanging within 6 to 24 hours of the injury and deceased informant succumbed to her injuries on 30.09.2011. Further, petitioners have no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioners be Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23729 of 2012 (3) dt.27-08-2012 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra, in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 84/2011, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.