Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34826 of 2012 ====================================================== Kishun Das .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 19-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Junior Engineer is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that Rs. 22,344/- and Rs. 2,304/- were misappropriated by preparing false muster roll and recording wrong measurement. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that enquiry has been done after more than one year of the conduction of the work and irregularity has been found of meager amount. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34826 of 2012 (3) dt.19-09-2012 2/2 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 78 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.