Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11191 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Jhalar Yadav 2. Rajo Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 09-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of transferring the land of the informant by impersonating the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that initially case was found false during investigation and on protest cognizance has been taken. This Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners since the case was instituted in the year, 1997 but on merits since the accusation has been found false it is a fit case for Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11191 of 2012 (2) dt.09-04-2012 2/2 consideration of regular bail if petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 39 of 1997 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioners. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.