Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.309 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunny Ansari, son of Md. Munna Ansari @ Istaque Ansari, resident of Vill. Harpur Parsa, P.S. Parsa, Distt. Saran at Chapra under the guardianship of Istaque Ansari, father of the petitioner and guardian. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh with Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Suraj Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 2 15-03-2012 Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suraj Prasad Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. This application is for grant of bail to the petitioner under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Earlier such prayer was rejected by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Saran at Chapra on 14.12.2011 in Juvenile Enquiry No. 309 of 2011 in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2011. The appeal was also dismissed on 19.01.2012 by the Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra in Cr. Appeal No. 10 of 2012. The petitioner has been made an accused later on in Bheldi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2011 which was registered for offence Patna High Court CR. REV. No.309 of 2012 (2) dt.15-03-2012 2 under [STATUTE] . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was alleged to have been apprehended in Bheldi P.S. Case No. 42 of 2011 on 13.05.2011 and on the basis of suspicion only, he has been made an accused in the present case as well as in other cases of similar nature. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has absolutely no connection with the person who has been made a co- accused. There is also no ground for such implication save and except the fact that he is alleged to have been apprehended in Bheldi P.S. Case No. 42 of 2011. Learned counsel also submits that in the said Bheldi P.S. Case No. 42 of 2011, this Court has granted bail to the petitioner on 15.03.2012 in Cr. Revision No. 310 of 2012. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Saran at Chapra in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2011 (Juvenile Enquiry No. 309 of 2011). One of the bailors should be father of the petitioner. Both the petitioner and the bailor shall also execute a bond of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.309 of 2012 (2) dt.15-03-2012 3 good behaviour with an undertaking that the petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity. Any violation of the condition of the bond shall lead to automatic cancellation of bail in the present case. The petitioner shall physically present himself before the Probation Officer, Saran at Chapra at least once a month and also as and when directed by him. The Probation Officer, Saran at Chapra shall maintain strict supervision over the petitioner. This application accordingly stands disposed off. The order may be communicated to the court below through fax upon deposition of the requisite fee on behalf of the petitioner. Anjani/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.