Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 19629 of 2012 ====================================================== Sanjay Mahto @ Sanjai Mahto S/o Late Ramdeo Mahto Resident of Village- Tariyani Chhapra, P.S- Tariyani, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 20.06.2012 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under [STATUTE] . The Petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 11.02.2010 and 20.04.2011. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. . Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2009 and he has no criminal antecedents, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with S.Tr. No. 519/2009 arising out of Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 1 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the Petitioner belongs to Sheohar and the other bailor shall be the mother of the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19629 of 2012 (2) dt.20-06-2012 2 address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.