Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22239 of 2012 (2) dt.22-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22239 of 2012 ====================================================== Manoj Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 22.06.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that except confessional statement of the petitioner and other accused, there appears to be nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier one case under [STATUTE] has been registered against the petitioner but in the aforesaid case, petitioner has already been granted privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Manoj Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Bisfi (Patauna) P.S. Case no. 300/2011. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.