Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41379 of 2011 Munna Singh, son of Shivdani Singh ------- Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ----Opposite Party ---------------------------------- 03. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 128/2007 for offences under [STATUTE] and 27 of the Arms Act, is one of the named accused in this case, but only on recovery of one license for fire arms during search in the house of non-petitioner from where, apart from such license, other fire arms were recovered. By filing supplementary affidavit petitioner has clearly stated that he possesses no license for any fire arms and further has no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ara (Bhojpur), in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 128/2007, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.