Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.956 of 2012 Guddu Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 12.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of demanding foreign liquor from shop of informant and on refusal destroying 3-4 bottles of liquor and snatching Rs. 15,000/- from cash counter. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners were protesting against running liquor shop which was situated near the school and house of petitioner as a result of which the present case has been lodged. The informant has not received any injury and petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is a student of B.A. Part-I. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 341 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.