Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44974 of 2012 ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s Smt. Veena Rani. Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-12-2012 Heard Mr. Virendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Veena Rani Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is in custody since 14-06-2012 in connection with Civil Line P.S.Case No. 236 of 2012 instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . The F.I.R. was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither any recovery was made from his possession nor any other material has come worth evidence to connect this petitioner with the offence alleged. Petitioner was arrested, according to him, only on the basis of suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent at all. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Dhiraj Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44974 of 2012 (2) dt.14-12-2012 2 / 2 2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Civil Line P.S.Case No. 236 of 2012. Naresh/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.