Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25687 of 2012 (2) dt.02-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25687 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramashish Ram @ Ramashis Ram, son of Late Bhuletan Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Tetri Devi, wife of Ramashish Ram .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 02-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . In this ten years old complaint case, petitioner is one of the named accused being husband of complainant Opposite Party No. 2 who appeared suo motu through learned counsel. He carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture and having another wives. Submission is of false implication but petitioner, whose earlier application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was disposed of vide order dated 24.3.2012 by a Bench of this Court Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25687 of 2012 (2) dt.02-08-2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32460/2003 with certain direction which could not be followed at appropriate time, is ready to pay consolidated amount of Rs. 50,000/- (fifty thousand only) to compensate the time consumed as precondition for his release on bail and thereafter, he further undertakes to pay a sum of Rs. 1500/- (fifteen hundred only) per month to the complainant Opposite Party No. 2 for maintenance, subject to any other order of the competent court on the point. In view of the above, on payment of the amount agreed to the complainant and filing undertaking to make regular payment, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1104 of 2002, Tr. No. 913 of 2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates and single default in payment, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 394

Statute Text:
Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing or attempting to commit robbery, or any other person jointly concerned in such robbery. If any person, in committing or in attempting to commit robbery, voluntarily causes hurt, such person, and any other person jointly concerned in committing or attempting to commit such robbery, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.