Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25904 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sarda Singh, S/O Late Chakradhar Singh. 2. Ajay Singh, S/O Mundrika Singh. Both are residents of Mohalla- Gami Tola, P.S. Katihar, District-Katihar. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.25524 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Satya Narayan Chaudhary, Son of Late Bishwanath Chaudhary. 2. Ambika Singh @ Ambika Pd. Singh, Son of Late Saryug Singh. 3. Mundrika Singh, Son of Late Saryug Singh. 4. Suresh Singh, Son of Ambika Singh. All of Village/Mohalla- Gamitola, P.S. Katihar(T), District-Katihar. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.25904 of 2012) For the Petitioners : M/S. Anil Kumar Mishra & Rishikesh Ojha, Advocates. For the Informant : M/S. Subodh Kumar Jha & Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocates. For the State : Mr. J.N. Thakur, A.P.P. (In Cr.Misc. No.25524 of 2012) For the Petitioners : M/S. Anil Kumar Mishra, Rishikesh Ojha and Shantanu Sagar, Advocates. For the Informant : M/S. Subodh Kumar Jha & Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocates. For the State : Mr.J.N. Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2012 The present cases have been listed for being taken-up out of turn since one of the petitioners, namely, Mundrika Singh suffered serious heart attach and is admitted in hospital. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25904 of 2012 (2) dt.13-07-2012 2 / 3 2 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioners and others were convening a meeting to commit offence when the informant intervened when co-accused Ashok Singh tried to fire but it got misfired and petitioner Ajay Singh pressed the neck of the informant. It is further alleged that petitioner Ambika Singh @ Ambika Prasad Singh took out Rs. 2600/- from the pocket of the informant when others made assault. It is submitted that the injury has been found to be simple when the informant’s title suit has been dismissed then the accusation has been levelled against the petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the injury has been caused on vital part of the informant. Considering the injury caused and accusation in the background of serious land dispute between the parties from before, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25904 of 2012 (2) dt.13-07-2012 3 / 3 3 surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Katihar (T)P.S. Case No. 252 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 147

Statute Text:
Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting. Whoever is guilty of rioting, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.