Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20074 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Saurbh Kumar S/O Ram Suresh Singh @ Suresh Singh Resident Of Village- Dunhi, P.S.- Gardhpura, Dist.- Begusarai, At Present Residing At Gachitola, P.S.- Town Police Station, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 24-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Begusarai P.S. Case No. 100 of 2012 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . The prosecution case is that two persons took out Rs. 600/- from the pocket of the informant and one of them was caught by the informant and he assaulted the informant and his two three other companions assaulted him. On raising alarm, they were apprehended by the mob and disclosed their names as Saurabh Kumar, Govind Kishore Mahto and Naveen Kumar. On search Rs. 300/- was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and Rs. 200/- was from Govind Kishore Mahto and Rs. 100/- from Naveen Kumar. It is submitted that the petitioner is a student and Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20074 of 2012 (2) dt.24-05-2012 2/3 while he was returning after taking tution in the way some people were quarreling and petitioner tried to pacify the matter and, later on, he has been made accused in that case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He has been in custody since 20.3.2012. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 7000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 100 of 2012 with the following conditions: 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20074 of 2012 (2) dt.24-05-2012 3/3 cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody. RPS/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.