Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40772 of 2012 ====================================================== Raja Raut .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 13-12-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The theft was committed in the Samsung Mobile Service Center of the informant when mobile phones, other articles and Rs. 2,000/- was stolen. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a statement has been made in para 17 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40772 of 2012 (3) dt.13-12-2012 2/2 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 256 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted by learned court below on the verification of the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.