Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23780 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23780 of 2012 ====================================================== Amit Vikash Jhadhav @ Amit Vikash Yadav, son of Vikash Krishna Rao, 349/2, Dipti Niwas Road No. 19, Gore Gawn, East Mumbai – 62 (Maharastra). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 18-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . In this case instituted against unknown. petitioner’s name emerged during investigation on the basis of his own extra judicial confession made in another case on being apprehended. Submission is of false implication and absolutely nothing to corroborate such extra judicial confession nor petitioner was ever put on Test Identification Parade, charge-sheet has also been submitted. Having regard to the facts and circumstances Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23780 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two local sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 15/2011, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further, prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of privilege granted to the petitioner, if anything emerging at any subsequent stage against the petitioner. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.