Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47305 of 2012 ====================================================== Amlesh Kumar Yadav S/O Rabish Yadav R/O Village - Balipur, P.S. Jamalpur, District - Munger .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Irshad, Advocate For the State of Bihar : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 19-12-2012 In a criminal prosecution registered under [STATUTE] , the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. as an accused. According to the prosecution case the petitioner was apprehended at the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was also a bona fide passenger, but merely on suspicion he was apprehended and was handed over to the police. It is highlighted that, as a matter of fact, even according to the prosecution case it was merely an attempt to commit offence of theft and offence was not complete. The petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since 7.8.2012. It is also highlighted that there is no other criminal case pending against the petitioner, except the present one. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances, the prayer for bail is allowed. Petitioner, Amlesh Kumar Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47305 of 2012 (2) dt.19-12-2012 2/2 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with G.R.P. Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2012 to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul, Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions that: (a) One of the bailors shall be a government servant and other bailor shall be his father. (b) If the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. (c) The petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. RPS/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.