Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9913 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sarwan Prajapati @ Srawan Prajapati, 2. Tara Devi, 3. Dewanti Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of assault by lathi and snatching cash and watch. It is submitted that during investigation, accusation was found false and final form was submitted but differing with the same, cognizance has been taken. Considering the fact that the accusation was found false during investigation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9913 of 2012 (2) dt.29-03-2012 2 / 2 2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua (Kaimur) in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 238/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.