Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3513 of 2012 (2) dt.22-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3513 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sukdeo Mehta @ Sukhdeo Mehta S/o Late Dhaneshwar Mehta 2. Prakash Mehta @ Julmi Mehta @ Ram Prakash Mehta S/o Sukdeo Mehta .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. M.K. Gautam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2. 22.2.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 7.9.2011 vide Cr.Misc.No.25912 of 2011 but had been given the liberty to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge if their trial is not bifurcated for the said purpose. The prayer for bail of the petitioners has renewed on the ground that charges have been jointly framed against all the accused persons and they deserve to be bailed out on the strength of earlier order. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3513 of 2012 (2) dt.22-02-2012 the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.1, Katihar in connection with Sessions Trial No.386 of 2011 arising out of Kadwa Case No.218 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the wife/mother/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 452

Statute Text:
Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code. House-trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt, assault, etc. Whoever commits house-trespass, having made preparation for causing hurt to any person or for assaulting any person, or for wrongfully restraining any person, or for putting and person in fear of hurt, or of assault, or of wrongful restraint, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.