Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29975 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Shiv Kumar Yadav, Son of late Thakur Yadav. 2.Raghu Yadav, Son of Jainarayan Yadav. 3.Sanjay Yadav, Son of Sadhanand Yadav. 4.Binod Yadav, Son of Shiv Kumar Yadav. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 5 15-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph – 47 dated 05/02/2012. Earlier, in this application out of total four petitioners, prayer as regard to petitioner nos. 2 & 3 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 09/02/2012. Remaining petitioner nos. 1 & 4 are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , are named accused in this case of simple assault and demand of money. Submission is of false implication and the informant taking a ‘U’ turn by filing a petition on 30/07/2011 itself before the court below. If, it is so, in the event of informant by appearing before the court below, on due identification, supporting factum of filing and contents therein with his free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner nos. 1 & 4 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29975 of 2011 (5) dt.15-03-2012 2 / 2 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 68 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 629 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 384

Statute Text:
Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. Extortion. Whoever commits extortion shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.