Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31706 of 2011 1.Sugan Rai, Son of Karmu Rai, resident of Village Maner Sarai Mohalla P.S. – Maner, District – Patna. 2.Mishari Rai @ Mishari Lal Rai @ Mishari Lal, Son of Surajdeo Rai. 3.Surajdeo Rai, Son of Santlal Rai, Both are resident of Village Hathitola, P.S. – Maner, District – Patna. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party -------------------- 04/- 02/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary and case diary of counter case i.e. Maner P.S. Case No. 98 of 2011 respectively up to paragraph – 51 dated 02/12/2011 & paragraph – 35 dated 30/07/2011. All the three petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , are named accused in this case of assault. Submission is that there is counter version also by way of Maner P.S. Case No. 98 of 2011 and there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners. Moreover, on the injury sustained opinion was kept reserved awaiting X-ray report, but nothing of the kind could be done indicating that the injuries are simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 97 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.