Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21076 of 2012 ====================================================== Binod Kumar & Anr .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 03-07-2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that accused persons took Rs. 4,10,000/-for transferring the land, but neither sale deed was executed nor money was returned. It is alleged against the petitioners that being brokers they took Rs. 10,000/- from the informant. Considering the nature of accusation against the petitioners and the thrust of accusation against others, let the petitioner namely 1. Binod Kumar 2. Suresh Singh @ Suresh Ram, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21076 of 2012 (3) dt.03-07-2012 2 / 2 2 satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 233 of 2011. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.