Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41295 of 2011 Parvati Devi, Wife of Late Brij Bihari Singh, R/o Village Karbandiya, P.S. Sasaram (M), District Rohtas. ………Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ……….Opposite party ----------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.42754 of 2011 Birendra Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Babuchand Singh, R/o Village Ugar Bigha, P.S. Sasaram (M), District Rohtas. ………Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ……….Opposite party ----------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.43592 of 2011 Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Baijnath Singh, R/o Village Kanchanpur, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. ………Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ……….Opposite party ---------------- 02/- 02/01/2012 Since all these applications arising out of one case are taken up together and being disposed of by this Composite order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act, are named accused in this case. Submission is that under almost similarly situated circumstance, co-accused Arvind Kumar Singh has already been granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 2 14/12/2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42428 of 2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 1064 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to petitioners, namely, Birendra Kumar Singh (Cr. Misc. No. 42754/2011) and Ajay Kumar Singh (Cr. Misc. No. 43592/2011) to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 353

Statute Text:
Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code. Assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from discharge of his duty. Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person being a public servant in the execution of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person to the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.