Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6148 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chalitar Paswan, S/O Dhanraj Paswan, Resident of Village- Hathauri Basaul, Police Station- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. 2. Baiju Paswan, S/O Rudal Paswan Resident Of Village- Hathauri Basaul, Police Station- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL) 2 08-02-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No.210/2011 registered under [STATUTE] . and Section 3/4 of the Dian Act. It is submitted that this case has been lodged as retaliation of the case lodged by the son of the petitioner no.1 before the Sarpanch. It has been further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge and there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioners. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6148 of 2012 (2) dt.08-02-2012 2 / 2 2 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners while opposing their prayer. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above-named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No.210/2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that the petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence and they will appear before the court on each and every date fixed in the case except for any cogent reason. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and they will be taken into custody forthwith. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.