Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13182 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chenarik Rai 2. Raj Kumar Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 16-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation against petitioner Chenarik Rai to have caused firearm injury on the hand of Ranbir whereas petitioner Raj Kumar Rai caused firearm injury on the leg of Kavita. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is counter version of the occurrence also when the several persons of the petitioners’ side have also received injuries. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13182 of 2012 (2) dt.16-04-2012 2/2 named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Akilpur P.S. Case No. 49 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.