Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24592 of 2012 ====================================================== Sonu Kumar & Anr. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of theft of ornaments from the running train. One Deepak Kumar Yadav was apprehended and from whose possession recovery was made. Subsequently, Deepak Kumar Yadav named this petitioner. It is submitted that Deepak Kumar Yadav has been acquitted. In view of this Court, it is a good ground for consideration of regular bail if the petitioners Sonu Kumar and Dayanand Paswan surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in connection with G.R.P. Kiul P.S. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24592 of 2012 (2) dt.20-07-2012 2 / 2 2 Case No. 78 of 2011 pending in the court of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Kiul, Lakhisarai. With this observation, the application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioners. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.