Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25601 of 2012 (3) dt.07-09-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25601 of 2012 ========================================== Rinku Yadav, son of Saral Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ========================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.27198 of 2012 ======================================== 1. Ramesh Choudhar, 2. Shambhu Choudhary Both are sons of Baban Choudhary .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ========================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 07-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Both these applications are being heard together and being disposed of by this common order. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners who have been made an accused in connection with Navanagar P.S. Case No. 40 of 2011 pending before A.D.J., F.T.C. – 1ST, Buxar, in S. Tr. No. 105/2012, for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . In this case instituted against unknown. petitioners’ name emerged during investigation in extra judicial confession of co- apprehended accused and petitioner Rinku Yadav on being apprehended also has made confession leading to recovery of looted Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25601 of 2012 (3) dt.07-09-2012 articles from the Gold Shop and the same have also been identified during Test Identification Parade and trial has also commenced. In view of the above, prayer of regular bail of Rinku Yadav, (petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 25601/2012) is hereby rejected. Simultaneously, court below is directed to proceed expeditiously and avoid undue delay and adjournment. But so far as petitioners namely Ramesh Choudhary and Shambhu Choudhary (petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 27198/2012) , neither anything is recovered from them nor they were put on Test Identification Parade at any point of time. However, they carry no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioners namely Ramesh Choudhary and Shambhu Choudhary (petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 27198/2012) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C. – 1ST, Buxar, in connection with Navanagar P.S. Case No. 40/2011, S. Tr. No. 105/2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.