Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28822 of 2012 (2) dt.30-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28822 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ajeet Kumar Singh @ Ajeet Kumar , son of Ravi Prasad, resident of Village- Hardas Bigha, P.S. Khusroopur, District- Patna. 2. Chotu Kumar, son of Mohan Lal, resident of Ganga Sarai, P.S. Badheya, District- Lakhisarai. 3. Rajesh Kumar, son of Late Kamta singh, resident of Amarpur, P.S.Dhanrua, District- Patna. 4. Babloo Kumar, son of Suresh Singh, resident of Village+P.S. Devna, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.29571 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Alok Kumar , son of Surendra Prasad, resident of Islampur, P.S. Sonepur, District- Chapra. 2. Upendra Kumar Singh, son of Devendra Singh, resident of Village- Muhamadpur, P.S. Naubatpur, District- Patna. 3. Barun Kumar, son of Ramashankar Kumar Sharma, resident of Makhdumpur, P.S.+District- Jehanabad. 4. Sankar Kumar, son of Awadh Bihari Singh, resident of Village+P.S. Masaurhi, District- Patna. 5. Dhirendra Kumar, son of Rabindra Singh, resident of Chandravansi Nagar, P.S. Paliganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2 30-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Both the cases have disposed of by common order as both the cases arises out of same Kotwali P.S. Case No. 286 of 2012, registered under [STATUTE] . Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28822 of 2012 (2) dt.30-07-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have given some training to some unemployed students for employment and petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 286 of 2012 G.R. No. 2880 of 2012. m.p. (Gopal Prasad, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.