Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15958 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ramdeo Das S/O Late Makhan Das Resident Of Village- Chakdah, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 2. Rafid Nadaf @ Rafik Nadaf S/O Faudar Nadaf Resident Of Village- Baira, Parsa, P.S.- Jainagar, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under [STATUTE] in which they are in custody since 18.11.2011. It is submitted that the case was registered against 15 unknown accused persons. In course of investigation only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused they were remanded to judicial custody. Till date they have not been put on T.I.P. and nothing incriminating has been recovered from their possession. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners named above are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Madhubani, in connection with Khirhar P.S. case no.2/2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavits giving genealogy as to how they are related with the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15958 of 2012 (2) dt.18-04-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioners (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they shall immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this Court. sudip/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.