Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12198 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12198 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Birendra Yadav S/O Late Sarvajeet Yadav R/O Vill-Baggaiba, Under Gordah Panchayat, P.S.Salkhua, Distt-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.12200 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Premlal Yadav S/O Late Hakkar Yadav R/O Vill-Koparia, P.S.-Salkhua, Distt-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In Cr.Misc. No.12198 of 2012 the petitioner is Birendra Yadav and in Cr.Misc. No.12200 of 2012 the petitioner is Premlal Yadav. Both of them have been made accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . They are P.D.S. dealers. The allegation relates to non-deposit of rice lifted under the Sampoorn Gramin Rojgar Scheme. It has been submitted that both the dealers have already deposited the price equivalent to the rice alleged to have been lifted to be distributed under the scheme. They are in custody since 7.2.2012. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioners named above are directed to Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12198 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No.122 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they shall immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.