Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26091 of 2012 (2) dt.06-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26091 of 2012 ====================================================== Brajesh Kumar, son of Raj Nandan @ Ramji .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The petitioner is solitary named accused in this case but on mere suspicion. Submission is of false implication and the battery said to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner was never put on TIP and there is nothing to show the same connected with the instant case. Further, he is in custody simply because of carrying one old case wherein he is on bail. If, it is so, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26091 of 2012 (2) dt.06-08-2012 amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 91 of 2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.