Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14883 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Jitendra Singh @ Tigger @ Manjeet, Son of late Suryadeo Singh, resident of village-Chapri, P.S.-Obra, District-Aurangabad. 2. Jayanandan Paswan, son of Deosharan Paswan, resident of village- Chapri, P.S.-Obra, District-Aurangabad. 3. Suresh Yadav @ Chandan jee, son of Ramratan Yadav, resident of village-Meerganj, P.S.-Paraiya, District-Gaya. 4. Yugal Yadav @ Yugesh jee @ Ashutosh jee, son of Shivnath Yadav, resident of village-Bharondha, P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence under [STATUTE] , 27 of the Arms Act, 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act and 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is stated that they are neither named in the F.I.R. nor caught at the spot nor anything incriminating was recovered from their possession. They have been arrested merely on suspicion and are in custody since 29.10.2011. Save and except confessional statement of some of the accused persons, there is no other material to support their involvement in the present case. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14883 of 2012 (2) dt.10-04-2012 2 / 2 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account that the charge sheet has already been submitted, they are directed to be released on bail on their executing a bond with two solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati Gaya in connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 2008 on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they will immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 427

Statute Text:
Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief, and thereby causing damage to the amount of 50 rupees or upwards. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.