Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19884 of 2012 (3) dt.07-09-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19884 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Pankaj Kumar, 2. Mukesh Kumar Milan, 3. Subhash Kumar Chauhan, 4. Rahul Kumar Singh, 5. Chandra Kant Jha, 6. Rabindra Kumar, 7. Sanjeev Kumar, 8. Barun Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 07-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of annexing forged certificate with application for being considered for appointment of Physical Trained Teacher. It is submitted that the certificate was from a genuine institution but the institution was subsequently derecognized and the petitioners have not been appointed on the basis of said certificate. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19884 of 2012 (3) dt.07-09-2012 weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Saharsa in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 35 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.