Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6984 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ranjeet Kumar 2. Girija Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.6989 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Madan Kumar 2. Pintu Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar …. …. Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . and Sections 51, 63, 65, 68A of the Copy Right Act. The accusation is of preparation of Blue Film when Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6984 of 2012 (2) dt.13-03-2012 2 / 3 2 recovery of certain C.Ds were made. The F.I.R. was lodged against Ramashish Prasad and Pintu Kumar. Recovery was made from Pintu Kumar. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the present Pintu Kumar is not the Pintu Kumar from whom recovery was made and subsequently the daughter of Manju Devi made her 164 Cr.P.C. statement when she named her parents and these petitioners for forcing her to commit the offence. Considering the fact that mother of the victim has been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 42882 of 2011 on the ground that the victim involved her parents since the parents were objecting the illegal activities of the victim, let the petitioners namely 1. Ranjeet Kumar 2. Girija Devi 3. Madan Kumar, in the event of their arrest or surrender before learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 72 of 2011. So far as petitioner Pintu Kumar is concerned, let learned Court below verify this fact that petitioner Pintu Kumar is not the accused Pintu Kumar from whom recovery has been made the learned Court below may consider regular bail of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6984 of 2012 (2) dt.13-03-2012 3 / 3 3 the petitioner Pintu Kumar, if the petitioner Pintu Kumar surrenders within a period of six weeks in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 72 of 2011, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. With the observations above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioners. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.