Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6099 of 2012 ====================================================== Niraj Tiwary, Son of Late Kashi Nath Tiwary, resident of village- Chaphawa, P.S.-Bhorey, District-Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that in the F.I.R. co-accused Vijay Tiwari was named. The petitioner’s name figured in course of investigation. Vijay Tiwari has already been granted bail by order dated 30.11.2010 passed in A.B.P. No. 1009 of 2010 by the learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the informant and the named accused Vijay Tiwari. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely Niraj Tiwari in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6099 of 2012 (2) dt.08-02-2012 2 / 2 2 Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 164 of 2010 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he will immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.