Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19267 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Somar Yadav, son of Surdan Yadav. 2. Birendra Yadav, son of Nagina Yadav. Both resident of Vill. Mirganj, P.S. Shakurabad, Distt. Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 2 29-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners seek bail in S. Tr. No. 102 of 2005/ 75 of 2008/25 of 2012 arising out Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 203 of 1999 dated 20.06.1999 registered for offence under [STATUTE] and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case the petitioners have been arrested due to misuse of bail granted to them earlier in the year 2008. The petitioners have been arrested on 07.02.2012 pursuant to the bail bond being cancelled on 07.11.2008. Learned counsel submits that they have been sufficiently punished for their non-appearance before the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19267 of 2012 (2) dt.29-05-2012 2 court but the reason for the same was ignorance and there was no deliberate laches on their part. It is further submitted that the chargesheet has been framed and the trial is to commence. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for about four years and thus the petitioners do not deserve bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsels for the parties, let the abovenamed petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Jehanabad in connection with S. Tr. No. 102 of 2005/ 75 of 2008/25 of 2012 arising out Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 203 of 1999. The grant of bail to the petitioners is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall co-operate in trial and not absent themselves without due and sufficient cause. If they do so, the bail granted shall stand cancelled. This application, accordingly, stands disposed off. Anjani/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 504

Statute Text:
Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace. Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.