Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24351 of 2012 =================================================== Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chandan @ Shaikhar Kumar S/o Vidyananda Singh Resident of Village- Samho, P.S.- Samho, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 18.07.2012 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under [STATUTE] . The Petitioner was refused bail by order dated 03.08.2011. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. Considering the period of custody, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated for such purposes on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sri Amit Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger (or its successor) in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 340 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24351 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 2 (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.