Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21455 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Rinku Singh S/O Sri Rajendra Singh R/O Village - Anti, P.S. Nawada, District - Nawada .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 12-06-2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 3.4.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] and [STATUTE] was added later on registered in connection with Nawada Town P.S.Case No.57 of 2012. According to the F.I.R. lodged by the informant Basanti Devi her husband was assaulted by Upendra Yadav and Arun Yadav who ultimately died. It has been stated in the F.I.R that the informant’s husband has been assaulted by the aforesaid two named persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant in her written report clearly states that the petitioner had, in fact, protested the assault made by Upendra Yadav and Arun Yadav stating not Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21455 of 2012 (2) dt.12-06-2012 2 2 to commit the violent act on his premises. Considering the aforesaid statement in the F.I.R which clearly shows that the petitioner had protested the violent act by Upendra Yadav and Arun Yadav, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S.Case No.57 of 2012 on the following conditions: (I) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) That one of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. ahk/- (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 504

Statute Text:
Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace. Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.