Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9744 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Sakhi Paswan .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he resorted to firing twice but injury was not caused to any one and subsequently he pressed the neck of the complainant and snatched Rs. 3,000/-. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that in the background of serious land dispute the present case has been lodged. For occurrence of 01.07.2010, complaint was lodged on 02.07.2010. Considering the accusation in the background of serious land dispute between the parties, let the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9744 of 2012 (2) dt.29-03-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 851 of 2010, Tr. No. 2351 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhabhua, Kaimur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.