Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31380 of 2012 (2) dt.22-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31380 of 2012 =================================================== Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Kumar @ Pinku S/o Upendra Singh Resident of Village- Mabby, P.S.- Warisliganj, District- Nawadah. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 22.08.2012 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under [STATUTE] . The Petitioner was refused bail on merits by order dated 14.10.2011. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that none of the witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution. However, I find from the impugned order that only two witnesses are left to be examined. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected with direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of four months of receipt of this order. It is made clear that if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid time frame the Petitioner will not be entitled to bail on this ground. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.