Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43235 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Suresh Chandra Barman, son of late Sashadhar Barman, R/o - Village + P.O. – Daspara, P.S. – Chopra, District – Uttar Dinajpur (West Bengal). 2. Dhanesh Chandra Roy, S/o – late Jagannath Sinha, R/o – vill. – Sardervita, P.O. – Jagta Gaon, P.S. – Islampur, District – Uttar Dinajpur (West Bengal). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 15-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Vigilance and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 06/2000 corresponding to Special Case No. 10/2000 for offences under [STATUTE] and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act, 1988, pending in the court of Special Judge, Vigilance – II, Patna. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek regular bail where the prayer shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudice of instant withdrawal. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.