Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12224 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunil Chawla .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 09-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . The accusation is that the complainant paid Rs. 2,00,000/- to the accused Sanjay Kumar Mehta to deliver the medicine worth Rs. 39,905/-, Rs. 30,761/- and Rs. 40,412/- and assured the complainant for giving commission on the transaction but the same was not paid and when the complainant enquired from the petitioner being the owner of the company then he replied that he is not the C& F of the firm and when the complainant insisted for the demand then the assault was made. Considering the nature of accusation arising out the contractual relationship between the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12224 of 2012 (2) dt.09-04-2012 2/2 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 1203 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.