Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13965 of 2012 (3) dt.20-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13965 of 2012 ====================================================== Abdul Sattar @ Md. Sattar .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3 20-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for regular bail for the offence under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the occurrence took place due to the land dispute and petitioner along with hundred miscreants armed with deadly weapons were present there. There is specific allegation against Md. Sattar, Md. Amrul and Md. Nazrul Islam that they assaulted Shobhi Rishi with farsa and hansua. The injury report, however, established incised wound on middle portion of Head Trasfertly placed 4”x1/2” bone deep, incised wound on back of head trouseriouly place 3”x1/2”x1/2” bone deep and on opening the skill the occipital bone is found having transverse o had line as well as crack and large hacunate was found on the back of brain Sabadurai in nature. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charge. Kundan/- (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 148

Statute Text:
Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting armed with deadly Weapon. Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.