Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41883 of 2011 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sushila Devi .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 06-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 04.10.2011 in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of torture for non-fulfillment of the dowry demand. Learned counsel for the informant submits that he is not opposing the bail of the petitioner provided that he makes payment of some maintenance amount. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs.500/- to the informant from April, 2012 by depositing the same in the bank account of the informant by 2nd week of every month. The counsel for the informant undertakes to supply Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41883 of 2011 (3) dt.06-03-2012 2/2 the bank account number within a period of three weeks by filing the same on affidavit before the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the period under custody, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 143 of 2011. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.