Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12888 of 2012 (2) dt.29-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12888 of 2012 ====================================================== Lalita Devi wife of Kameshwar Singh, resident of village-Aamsari, P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that a complaint has been made on the basis of vague and unfounded facts. The two other co-accused namely Pahari Dusadh and Nathuni Prasad being Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary have already been granted bail by order dated 15.3.2012 passed in Cr.Misc. No.7730 of 2012 and Cr.Misc. No. 9611 of 2012 respectively by another Bench of this court. The petitioner is a lady and was Upmukhiya of the Panchayat concerned at the relevant time. Her case is identically situated or stands on better footing to that of other co-accused persons, who have already been granted anticipatory bail. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12888 of 2012 (2) dt.29-03-2012 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Murar P.S. Case No.82 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. as also subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.