Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21684 of 2012 (2) dt.12-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21684 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Rajendra Yadav S/o Late Laxmi Yadav 2. Madan Yadav S/o Late Anup Yadav .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 12.06.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody since 29.11.2011 and 25.11.2011 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 242 of 2008. 3. The allegation relates to firing on the informant resulting in injury to the shoulder of informant and a First Information Report in this connection be instituted against certain persons named therein as well as some unknown persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is not named in the First Information Report and petitioner no.2 has been named in the First Information Report. In any event similarly situated persons have already been granted bail by various orders Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21684 of 2012 (2) dt.12-06-2012 of this Court as contained in Annexure-2 & 3 annexed with the bail petition. There is nothing to show that the injury caused to the informant is attributable to either of the present petitioners. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 242 of 2008 on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioners will not indulge themselves in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioners. (iii) The petitioners will be well represented on each and every date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. Fahad. (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 148

Statute Text:
Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting armed with deadly Weapon. Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.