Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33889 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Roushan Kumar, S/O Sri Sitaram Singh, R/O Village - Narayanpur, Police Station – Bikram, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.K. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 3. 09-02-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sasaram Town P.S.Case No.611 of 2002 for offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The allegation against this petitioner is of purchasing a Commander jeep on the basis of a bank draft which was found to be forged. It is also alleged that this petitioner had entered into the alleged transaction by impersonating as one Arun Kumar Sharma. The petitioner has also 11 cases to his credit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33889 of 2011 (3) dt.09-02-2012 2 matter has been put to trial and that charges have also been framed in the case. In the aforesaid circumstances and taking into consideration that the petitioner has remained in custody since 26.12.2009, let petitioner Roushan Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Prem Chandra Verma, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Sasaram Town P.S.Case No.611 of 2002 , subject to the condition that the petitioner shall ensure his representation before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the trial and the failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation before the trial court on two consecutive dates fixed in the trial without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial court, would entitle the court concerned to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 464

Statute Text:
Section 464 of the Indian Penal Code. None. A person is said to make a false document: Who dishonestly or fraudulently makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document, or makes any mark denoting the execution of a document, with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document or part of a document was made, signed, sealed or executed by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed or executed, or at a time at which he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed or executed; or Who, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently, by cancellation or otherwise, alters a document in any material part thereof, after it has been made or executed either by himself or by any other person, whether such person be living or dead at the time of such alteration; or Who dishonestly or fraudulently causes any person to sign, seal, execute or alter a document, knowing that such person by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot, or that by reason of deception practised upon him, he does not know the contents of the document or the nature of the alteration.