Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42962 of 2012 ====================================================== Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-12-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anand Mohan, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that in the year 2006, the petitioner took Rs. 1,79,851/- out of which the petitioner returned Rs. 10,000/- and the rest money has not been returned. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no proof with regard to payment to the petitioner and after five years of the cause of action, the complaint has been filed. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42962 of 2012 (2) dt.14-12-2012 2/2 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 2810C of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.