Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22431 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Kishore Sahgal, son of Nandlal Sahgal 2. Rashmi Sahgal, wife of Kishore Sahgal Both are resident of Flat No. AS-2, WINCON HOMES, 6 Fawn Broke, Avenue S.N. Marge, Lucknow – 226001 (UP). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rajnish Singh, son of late Raghunath Singh, resident of village – Siswan, P.S. – Siswan, District – Siwan. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.25632 of 2011 ====================================================== Sudhir Chugh (the petitioner real name is Sudhish Chugh, both as in the complaint Sudhir Chugh is given, the same name has been stated), son of Sri. G.L. Chugh, resident of S-431, Greater Kailash Part – 1, New Delhi, New Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rajnish Singh, son of late Raghunath Singh, resident of village – Siswan, P.S. – Siswan, District – Siwan. .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 5 19-03-2012 These applications have been heard and being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , are named accused in this complaint case with allegation of entering Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22431 of 2011 (5) dt.19-03-2012 2 / 2 2 into negotiation during visit of the complainant and the witnesses in connection with one marriage ceremony and on certain assurances to provide job realizing substantial amount of Rs. 6 lacs (two lacs each). Submission is of false implication without any substantive materials. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1544/2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition, except lady petitioner namely, Rashmi Sahgal in Cr. Misc. No. 22431/2011, to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.