Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10677 of 2012 (2) dt.07-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10677 of 2012 ====================================================== Ganesh Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 07-03-2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. Renewing the prayer for bail in an accusation under [STATUTE] for abduction of a minor child aged approximately three years stated to be missing till today the submission is that the mother of the victim has deposed in the trial, that it was Sudhir who had taken the child away. The Court has perused the evidence of mother of the victim. The deposition confirms that her child was taken away. She has named the petitioner also as party of the scheme. This is not the stage for dissection of evidence to decide innocence of the petitioner. The Court is not persuaded to grant bail. Let the trial be expedited. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 364A

Statute Text:
Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. Kidnapping for ransom, etc. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person or keeps a person in detention after such kidnapping or abduction, and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person, or by his conduct gives rise to a reasonable apprehension that such person may be put to death or hurt, or causes hurt or death to such person in order to compel the Government or any foreign State or international inter-governmental organisation or any other person to do or abstain from doing any act or to pay a ransom, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.