Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44250 of 2011 (2) dt.03-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44250 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Rai, son of Rajeshwar Rai 2. Dinesh Rai, son of Nirsan Rai, Both resident of village – Bari Bazar, Talkhapur, P.S. – Sitamarhi, District – Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA) 2 03-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 291/2011 for offences under [STATUTE] , are named accused in this case with allegation of petitioner no. 1 with another rescued petitioner no. 2 who was required and apprehended by the informant with aid of his two associates. Submission is of false implication and further the case wherein petitioner no. 2 was wanted, he has already been granted privilege under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. by this court vide order dated 13.01.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42185/2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44250 of 2011 (2) dt.03-02-2012 four weeks from today, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 291/2011, subject to condition under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, further additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 224

Statute Text:
Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code. Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension. Whoever intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself for any offence with which he is charged or of which he has been convicted, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained for any such offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.