Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21938 of 2012 (3) dt.28-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21938 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Anil Yadav S/O Yoganand Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 28-06-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 28.11.2011 in a case registered under [STATUTE] . It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the name of this petitioner came in confessional statement of co-accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been remanded in this case on the basis that he had talked with other accused by his mobile. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 117 of 2011. SHAHZAD/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.