Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22878 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chando Singh 2. Tuntun Singh @ Tuntun Prasad Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 24-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 27 of the Arms Act. The specific accusation of firing is against Pancha Singh, Ranjit Singh and Niranjan Singh @ Gopesh. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the accusation was found false and final form was submitted, but differing with the same cognizance has been taken. It is further submitted that never summons have been served upon the petitioners. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22878 of 2012 (2) dt.24-07-2012 2/2 This Court is not inclined to interfere only because the case was instituted in 2002, but considering the aforesaid facts, it is a fit case for consideration of regular bail by the learned court below if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 321 of 2002 pending in the court of learned SDJM, Lakhisarai. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioners. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) . .

Applicable IPC Section: 147

Statute Text:
Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting. Whoever is guilty of rioting, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.