Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23791 of 2012 ====================================================== Anil Kumar & Anr .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that Rs. 50,000/- was kept in the post office with regard to court fees and expenses of Claim Case No. 183 of 2006 which was withdrawn through a loss cheque of the complainant. It is submitted that there is nothing on record to suggest that withdrawal was made by false signature of the complainant whereas the petitioner no.1 Anil Kumar lodged the Complaint Case No. 1730(C) of 2010 against the complainant at earlier point of time. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners Anil Kumar and Sunil Kumar be released Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23791 of 2012 (2) dt.17-07-2012 2 / 2 2 on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 804(C) of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.