Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49 of 2012 ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Domu, Son of Bindeshwari Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 2. 1.2.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 24.11.2011 vide Cr.Misc.No.37359 of 2011 but had been given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that now charges have been framed. Considering the same as also that the petitioner has fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Warisliganj P.S. Case No.120 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.