Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21952 of 2012 (2) dt.13-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21952 of 2012 ====================================================== Ganesh Singh son of late Ram Sahay Singh, resident ofMouza Belari @ Jagdishpur Dayal, P.S.-Ujiyarpur, Dist.-Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-06-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that the case arises out of a complaint and there is no truth behind the allegation. The petitioner has nothing to do with the transaction in between the complainant and the persons who executed the sale deed. It is further contended that it would be evident from the sale deed dated 24.6.2010 that in the event there is any dispute over right, title and otherwise, the purchaser shall be entitled for compensation from the executant of the sale deed with effect from the date of execution of the sale deed. The petitioner has simply identified the vendor and the vendee. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21952 of 2012 (2) dt.13-06-2012 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dalsingsarai in connection with T.R. No.1553 of 2012 arising out of C.R. No.622 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State/complainant to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.