Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5295 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.Manoj Rai @ Manoj Prabhakar, Son of Vishwanath Rai. 2.Harendra Rai, Son of Vidya Rai. 3.Arun Rai @ Arun Kumar Yadav, Son of Jageshwar Rai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate. For the Informant : Mr. Birendra Nath Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 4 14-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary. All the three petitioners, who are languishing in custody, seek bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] and Section 27 of the Arms Act, are named accused in this case with allegation of shooting at the deceased as well as injured persons in a petty dispute. Submission is of false implication with exaggerated and conceals statement and there is counter version also by way of Ishuapur P.S. Case No. 2/2010 instituted against prosecution side, wherein, one Pankaj lost his life and others were injured. There is nothing on behalf of the prosecution to explain death of Pankaj, whereas, the witnesses during investigation has come to say that there was firing and cross-firing causing death of one each from both the sides without any specific accusation. Further, as submitted, petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5295 of 2012 (4) dt.14-05-2012 2 / 2 2 If, it is so, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Ishuapur P.S. Case No. 03/2010, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.