Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16972 of 2012 ====================================================== Birju Ram @ Birju Dome, son of Late Shankar Ram, resident of Mohalla- Mussalahpur Hat, Dom Toli, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 23-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under [STATUTE] against unknown accused persons. It is contended that in course of investigation, he was apprehended and remanded to judicial custody on 21.1.2012. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession and till date he has not been put on T.I. Parade. The alleged identification in the police station by the informant is not lawful. The investigation is over and chargesheet has already been submitted. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond with two solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of Gayatri Kumari, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 426 of 2011 (G.R. No. 6034 of 2011) on the following Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16972 of 2012 (2) dt.23-04-2012 2 / 2 2 conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he will immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.