Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17158 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17158 of 2012 ====================================================== Hridya Singh Yadav S/o Sachanu Singh Yadav .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 24.04.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2011. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with one Haridwar Ram attempted to commit rape upon the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the daughter of the informant who is said to have been with the informant at the relevant time has also not supported the prosecution case. The complaint itself was filed 48 hours later which casts doubt on the veracity of the allegation. Moreover, the co-accused is said to be relative to the informant, and it is submitted that the allegations are rooted in land dispute. It is stated that the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17158 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 informant herself has sought compromise by filing a petition before the concerned Court in view of amicable family relations having since been established between the accused and the informant. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua District-Kaimur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2011 on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. Fahad. (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 511

Statute Text:
Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life, or imprisonment, and in such attempt doing any act towards the commission of the offence. Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable by this Code with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offence to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence, shall, where no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the imprisonment for life or, as the case may be, one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with both.