Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3240 of 2012 ====================================================== Surendra Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 2 01-02-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that petitioner got appointment as Vikash Mitra in the panchayat on fabricated document, subsequently his appointment was cancelled on 30.08.2011. It is submitted that petitioner did not join in pursuance to the appointment and has not received any payment in pursuance to the appointment. Considering the fact that petitioner has not received any payment in pursuance to the appointment, let the petitioner namely Surendra Ram, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3240 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 2 / 2 2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Simari P.S. Case No. 182 of 2011. If it is found that petitioner has received any payment, then he will liable to return the same with statutory interest. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.