Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24651 of 2012 (2) dt.26-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24651 of 2012 ==================================================== Anuj Kumar @ Pathan, son of Ramesh Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ==================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.24703 of 2012 ==================================================== Babu Yadav @ Rohit Yadav, son of Sri Lala Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ==================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.27242 of 2012 ===================================================== Md. Anwar Sah @ Bholu Mian, son of Late Zunab Ali Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 26-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. These three applications have been heard together and being disposed of by this common order. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners who are in for the offences Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24651 of 2012 (2) dt.26-07-2012 punishable under [STATUTE] . In these cases instituted against unknown. Petitioners’ name emerged during investigation on some secret information. Submission is of false implication without any substantive material. Neither anything was, in fact, recovered from the possession of the petitioners nor having any connection with stolen articles. Further, at any point of time, petitioners were never put on TIP. Though, they carry few criminal cases against them but either they are on bail or acquitted. If, it is so, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2011, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.