Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8454 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Prakash Parmar 2. Rajeshwar Singh. 3. Ram Kishore Singh. 4. Krishna Singh @ Krish Mohan Singh. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-03-2012 Initially, the petitioners were granted bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 182(c) of 2010 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur, Ara in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] but they could not surrender within stipulate period fixed by learned court below when the application for extension of the period of surrender was rejected on 06.01.2012, hence the present application has been filed. Considering the fact that petitioners were granted bail on merits, let the learned court below accept the bail bond of the petitioners if the petitioners surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of the copy of this order. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8454 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 2/ 2 Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.