Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25513 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Baudh Bhuiyan, Son of Late Dasai Bhuiyan. 2. Rajendra Mandal, Son of Baudh Bhuiyan. 3. Upendra Mandal, Son of Baudh Bhuiyan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 31-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the three petitioners, who are languishing in custody, seek bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] , are named accused in this case arising out of respective claim and counter claim relating to particular piece of land for which no doubt proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. has recently been decided against them in favour of the prosecution. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 43/2012, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.