Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20310 of 2012 ====================================================== Manish Yadav & Anr .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 18-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is that with regard to land of the informant, one Dharmendra Kumar executed power of attorney in favour of petitioner no. 2 Binay Yadav claiming himself to be the owner when Binay Yadav executed sale deed in favour of petitioner no.1 Manish Yadav on which Nikhil Pratap Singh and Basisth Nath Singh are witnesses. It is submitted that Dharmendra Kumar has already been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against Dharmendra Kumar, let the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20310 of 2012 (3) dt.18-07-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioners, Manish Yadav and Binay Yadav be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 82 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 474

Statute Text:
Section 474 of the Indian Penal Code. Having possession of a document, knowing it to be forged, with intent to use it as genuine; If the document is one of the description mentioned in section 466 of the Indian Penal Code. Whoever has in his possession any document, knowing the same to be forged, and intending that the same shall fraudulently or dishonestly be used as genuine, shall, if the document is one of the description mentioned in section 466 of this Code, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if the document is one of the description mentioned in section 467, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description, for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.