Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1838 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Akhileshwar Singh @ Bagga Singh S/O Fuleshwar Singh Resident Of Village- Kajra, P.S And District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.4377 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Gajendra Mukhiya S/O Late Sukhder Mukhiya R/O Village - Jagatpur, P.S. & District - Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 02/ 01-02-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner Akhileshwar Singh @ Bagga is languishing in custody since 20.09.2011 in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the stolen vehicle was recovered from Gajendra Mukhiya but nothing was recovered from the petitioner. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1838 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Akhileshwar Singh @ Bagga Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Supaul in connection with Sessions Trial No. 225 of 2011 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010. Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he defaults for three consecutive occasions or gets involved in similar nature of the offence. So far petitioner Gajendra Mukhiya is concerned, recovery has been made from his possession and no statement has been made with regard to the criminal antecedent, let case diary be called for and put up his case after receipt of the same. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 413

Statute Text:
Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code. Habitually dealing in stolen property. Whoever habitually receives or deals in property which he knows or has reason to believe to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.