Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2332 of 2012 (2) dt.22-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2332 of 2012 ====================================================== Satish Kumar Pandey @ Satish Pandey son of Late Shambhu Nath Pandey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.N. Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2. 22.2.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 21.12.2011 but had been granted the liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that now charges have been framed and, therefore, the petitioner deserves to be bailed out on the strength of earlier order. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri Nisit Dayal, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No.105 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2332 of 2012 (2) dt.22-02-2012 shall be the mother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date during trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.