Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29913 of 2012 ====================================================== Nirmal Singh @ Nirmal Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-08-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of robbing Tata Sumo vehicle of the informant. The name of the petitioner sprang up in confession of Pramod Kumar Das. It appears that the case has been found true against the petitioner also under [STATUTE] . In view of this Court, it is a case for consideration of regular bail if the petitioner surrenders within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in connection with Sadar(Mufassil) Purnea P.S. Case No. 364 of 2009 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Purnia. With this observation, the application is Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29913 of 2012 (2) dt.24-08-2012 2 / 2 2 disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.