Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.6 of 2009 ====================================================== Vijay Singh son of late Dasai Singh, resident of Mohalla Lodipur Chakwara, P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Punit Prasad Singh son of Raktu Singh, resident of Mohalla Lodipur Chakwara, P.S. Hajipur Town, Post Hajipur, District Vaishali. .... .... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. C.M.Chaurasia, Adv. For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 20-09-2012 Heard. The petitioner was put on trial in G.R. No. 2528 of 1997/ Trial No. 127 of 2003 for charges under [STATUTE] . and on conclusion of trial, by judgment and order dated 31.03.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Class, Vaishali, he was convicted only for charge under [STATUTE] and instead of sentencing him to prison, he was released on due admonition in terms of Section 3 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. However, the petitioner was acquitted for other charges under [STATUTE] . On appeal preferred by the petitioner, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence has been affirmed by the impugned judgment dated 24th September 2008 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 25 of 2003 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no.1, Vaishali at Hajipur. Though the matter was argued at length by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, but in view of concurrent findings of fact recorded by the learned trial court as also by the learned appellate court and in view of the fact that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.6 of 2009 (3) dt.20-09-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioner has not been sentenced to prison, rather he has been released on due admonition in terms of Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, this Court is not inclined to exercise its revisional jurisdiction for setting aside and reversing the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence. No case for interference is made out. The application stands dismissed. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 324

Statute Text:
Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing or cutting, or any instrument which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive substance, or by means of any explosive substance or by means of any substance which it is deleterious to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive into the blood, or by means of any animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.