Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21391 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Pikesh Yadav S/O Rambilash Yadav Resident Of Village- Hansusingh Tola Harimar, P.S.- Bariyarpur, District- Munger..... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 13-06-2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 6.1.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No.73 of 2009. Allegation in the F.I.R. relates to firing made by 8 named persons leading to death of the informant’s father. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and has been implicated only on the basis of the statement of Manojl Kumar Singh (who is also not named in the F.I.R.) and later on, has already been granted bail by this court on 1.8.2011 passed in Cr.Misc.No.24438 of 2011. It is further stated that similarly Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21391 of 2012 (2) dt.13-06-2012 2 situated co-accused Koko Das who was also not named in the F.I.R. has been granted bail on 15.9.2011 in Cr.Misc.No.26550 of 2011. Considering the above facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Munger in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No.73 of 2009 on the following conditions: (I) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) That one of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. ahk/- (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 504

Statute Text:
Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace. Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.