Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11290 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ishwari Gope son of late Sital Rai, 2. Dharmendra Rai @ Surendra Kumar, son of Ishwari Gope, 3. Jitendra Rai, son of Ishwari Gope, 4. Jawahr Rai, son of Kuldip Rai, 5. Chanarik Rai son of Kuldip Rai, 6. Lalita Rai son of Kuldip Rai, 7. Shiv Kumar Rai, son of Kuldip Rai, 8. Arjun Rai, son of Jawahir Rai, 9. Ram Nirekhan Rai, son of Chanarik Rai, 10. Gupta Rai son of Chanarik Rai, All are resident of village-Saguna, Naya Tola, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar & 2. Paras Rai, son of Shiv Ratan Rai, resident of village-Naya Tola, Saguna, P.S.-Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.35026 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Kedar Rai 2. Paras Rai, both S/O Shiv Ratan Rai 3. Raj Ballabh Rai @ Raj Ballabh Kumar 4. Raj Banshi Rai, both S/O Paras Rai, all resident of Naya Tola, P.S. Danapur, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Ishwari Prasad Yadav, S/O Late Sheetal Prasad Sinha, resident of Naya Tola, P.S. Danapur, District Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: (In Cr. Misc. No.11290 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheojee Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocate Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP (In Cr. Misc. No.35026 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sheojee Mihra, Advocate Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11290 of 2012 (3) dt.27-09-2012 2 / 3 2 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3/ 27-09-2012 Heard the parties. The Petitioners of Cr. Misc. No.11290 of 2012 seek quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 18.01.2012 passed in Danapur P.S. Case No.181 of 2011 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Danapur, Patna, has taken cognizance under [STATUTE] . The Petitioners of Cr. Misc. No.35026 of 2012 seek quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including order dated 09.01.2012 passed in Danapur P.S. Case No.331 of 2010 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, by which he has taken cognizance under [STATUTE] . While hearing these matters, a proposal had been given that inter connected parties should settle the dispute between themselves which arise out of a civil difference and are minor in nature. In pursuance of the same, the parties are agreed that both the applications be allowed. Considering the interest of justice, both the applications are allowed and entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 18.01.2012 passed in Danapur P.S. Case No.181 of 2011 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Danapur, Patna, taking Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11290 of 2012 (3) dt.27-09-2012 3 / 3 3 cognizance under [STATUTE] as also entire criminal proceeding including order dated 09.01.2012 passed in Danapur P.S. Case No.331 of 2010 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, taking cognizance under [STATUTE] are hereby quashed. Applications stand allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 323

Statute Text:
Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing hurt. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.