Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13639 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Munna Yadav, S/o late Kujal Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhandara, P.S- Barhat, District- Jamui. 2. Babloo Yadav, S/o late Kujal Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhandara, P.S- Barhat, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that there is a counter case also registered against the informant and others inter alia under [STATUTE] . The further contention is that though there is allegation that the accused persons, named in the First Information Report indiscriminately assaulted the members of the prosecution party by lathi, iron rod, axe and spears etc. but the injuries sustained by them are simple and superficial and is said to have been caused by hard and blunt substance. Be that as it may, considering the nature of injuries, facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13639 of 2012 (2) dt.02-04-2012 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 02 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also on the following conditions: That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they will immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Ashwini/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.