Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21165 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21165 of 2012 ====================================================== Indar Paswan @ Bimal Paswan son of late Harihar Paswan, resident of village-Shekhalli, P.S.-Islampur, Dist.-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-06-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is contended that the police in course of investigation found the accusation against the petitioner to be false and, thus, filed a final report against him. Another co-accused, namely, Umesh Paswan having identical allegation has already been granted anticipatory bail by order dated 19.4.2012 passed in Cr.Misc. No.14408 of 2012. Regard being had to the nature of allegation, outcome of investigation conducted by the police and the fact that another co-accused having similar allegation has been granted anticipatory bail by this court, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21165 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No.45 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the conditions that (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 325

Statute Text:
Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 335, voluntarily causes grievous hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.