Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11352 of 2012 ====================================================== Mukhiya Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 09-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the daughter-in-law of the petitioner namely Gulo Devi by impersonating Rambati Devi withdrawn Rs.35,000/- under the Indira Awas scheme. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that thrust of accusation is against co-accused Gulo Devi who subsequently deposited the alleged money and the accusation against the petitioner is of conspiracy. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11352 of 2012 (2) dt.09-04-2012 2/2 is against Gulo Devi, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 09 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.