Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43708 of 2011 (2) dt.31-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43708 of 2011 ============================================== 1. Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Yadav, S/o – Arun Yadav 2. Rajendra Yadav @ Rajo Yadav, S/o – Guneshwar Yadav 3. Shankar Yadav, S/o- Saryug Yadav 4. Phani Chaudhary, S/o – late Saday Chaudhary 5. Anshu Chaudhary, S/o – Awadhesh Chaudhary All are R/o – village Sahuriya, P.S. – Saour Bazar, District – Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA) 2 31-01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 269/2011 for offences under [STATUTE] and 3(x) of the SC/ST Act, are named accused in this case of assault and other nuisances caused besides abuse. Submission is that there is general and omnibus allegation and this case appears squarely covered under the decision of Apex Court in a case Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of A.P. reported in 2009(1) BCCR 153(SC). The parties entered into compromise to resolving the disputes and petition in this Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43708 of 2011 (2) dt.31-01-2012 regard is on the record of the court below. If, it is so, in the event of informant appearing before the court below supporting the factum of compromise with his free-will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors and in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 269/2011, subject to condition under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, further additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.