Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25797 of 2012 (2) dt.26-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25797 of 2012 ====================================================== Ravi Kul Bhushan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.27531 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Raj Kishore Bhagat, 2. Runa Devi alias Renu Devi 3. Gonar Sharma .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 26-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] and sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is alleged that on 5.12.2010, the petitioners came to the house of the complainant and conveyed that her house will be auctioned and demolished when the accused persons armed with Kudal, khanti, Dabiya came then the complainant said that she has not taken any loan, when the accused persons became Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25797 of 2012 (2) dt.26-07-2012 furious, threw the house hold articles and abused the family members by calling the caste name. It is submitted that petitioner Ravi Kul Bhushan who is the Branch Manager of UCO Bank whereas the petitioner Runa Devi is purchaser and Raj Kishore Bhagat is the husband of purchaser and petitioner Gonar Sharma is the relative of the purchaser. On 27.8.2003 the loan was advanced to the son of the complainant Lalo Choudhary in which the other son was the guarantor. On 15.9.2005 when the default was made, demand notice was issued then on 25.3.2009 possession of the property was taken and on 30.3.2010 the property was auctioned which was purchased by Renu Devi (Petitioner) and sale certificate was issued on 26.4.2010, thereafter, on 23.12.2010 the present complaint was filed. Considering the fact that the house of the complainant was auction sold which clouds the bonafide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint case Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25797 of 2012 (2) dt.26-07-2012 no. 2003 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 427

Statute Text:
Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief, and thereby causing damage to the amount of 50 rupees or upwards. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.