Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22703 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Noorul, Son of Badrul Hussain. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 05-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is languishing in custody, seeks bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] , 27 of the Arms Act and 138 of the N.I. Act, is one of the named accused in this case instituted on basis of Complaint Case No. 1823/2011 with allegation of taking substantial amount as loan and much after avoiding repayment issued a cheque worth Rs. 1,50,000/- which too was bounced. Submission is of false implication and institution of counter case bearing K.Hat P.S. Case No. 290/2011 dated 13.07.2011, wherein, the police have already submitted charge-sheet. However, an offer is also made to pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- through bankers cheque or bank draft in favour of son of the informant, namely, Md. Awesh Alam in whose favour the bounced cheque is said to have been issued, positively by 05th September, 2012. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, subject to filing and personal undertaking by the petitioner to make payment as offered above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22703 of 2012 (2) dt.05-07-2012 2 / 2 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with K.Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 36 of 2012, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation or on failure in complying the undertaking, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.