Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24760 of 2008 (06) dt.13-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24760 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Ranvir Singh 2. Uma Shankar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s Appearance:- For the Appellant/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar-1(A.P.P.) Mr. Shahnawaz Ali Mr./Ms.Avnita Mandilwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER 06 13-12-2012 This is an application for quashing the order taking cognizance against the petitioners dated 07.11.2007 passed in Complaint Case No.945 of 2007 under [STATUTE] . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the state. Re-possession of the vehicle by the finance company has been made ground for accusation is not justified to continue prosecution anymore. Later payment of instalments also does not change the position. In this case it is said on behalf of the opposite party that instalments was paid later. Any negotiation in between the parties is allowed for any purpose. Accordingly, the quashing application is allowed and impugned order dated 07.11.2007 passed in Complaint Case No.945 of 2007 along with the whole prosecution against the petitioners is hereby quashed. Vikash/- (Mandhata Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.