Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42581 of 2011 1. Manoj Ram, son of late Ramdin Ram 2. Vinod Ram, son of late Dudhnath Ram Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sampat Ram, son of late Thaga Ram ---------------------------------- 2. 05.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . Considering that the first complaint ended in a final report whereafter the present complaint has been initiated on the basis of protest-cum-complaint petition and essentially the dispute is civil in nature, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Complaint Case No. 319 of 2010/Trial No. 1589 of 2011, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bhabua (Kaimur), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailors 2 shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.