Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9357 of 2012 (2) dt.01-03-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9357 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Mohan Paswan @ Manoj Paswan, S/O Mahendra Paswan, Resident of Village- Bageyan, P.S- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.9482 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ramashish Ram @ Tutu Ram @ Paletina, S/O Triveni Ram, Resident of Village- Nawadihkala, P.S.- Chutia, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 01.03.2012 Cr. Misc. No.9357/2012 and Cr. Misc. No.9482/2012 arise out of Chutiya P.S. Case No.10/2011 and as such, both the cases have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are accused in connection with Chutiya P.S. Case No.10/2011 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] ., Section ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9357 of 2012 (2) dt.01-03-2012 2 3, 4 and 17 of C.L.A. Act. It is submitted that the petitioners have not been named in the FIR. During investigation, only suspicion has been raised in the report of S.D.P.O. The petitioners have been in custody since 29.11.2011. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that in similar situation, the co- accused namely Dhananjay Singh @ Tutu Singh has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court on 30.01.2012 vide Cr. Misc. No.43587/2011. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners while opposing their prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Chutiya P.S. Case No.10/2011 with the following conditions : 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners. 2. The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9357 of 2012 (2) dt.01-03-2012 3 3. The petitioners will be well re-represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and they will be taken into custody forthwith. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 427

Statute Text:
Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief, and thereby causing damage to the amount of 50 rupees or upwards. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.