Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.750 of 2009 ====================================================== Krishna Devi wife of Jiya Lal Paswan, resident of Village/ Mohalla- Bari Hat; S.K. Hat, District Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kowala Devi wife of Shambhu Sah 3. Shambhu Sah son of late Raghu Nandan 4. Kali Charan Sah son of Late Ram Chandar Sah 5. Shiva Nand Sah @ Shibu Sah, son of Late Ram Pujan Sah All resident of Village/ Mohalla- Bari Hat; S.K. Hat, District Purnea. .... .... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar, with Mr. Suresh Prasad Bernwal, Advocates. For the State : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP For O.P. 2 to 5 : Mr. Kumar Parveen, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 16-10-2012 After having heard the parties this Court is not inclined to exercise its revisional jurisdiction for setting aside and reversing the judgment and order dated 19th March 2009 passed in Sessions Trial No. 1166 of 2001 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 6, Purnia, whereby accused Opposite party no. 2 to 5 have been convicted only for the charges under [STATUTE] , and have not been convicted for charge under [STATUTE] . The grievance of the petitioner is that though accused opposite party no. 2 to 5 have been convicted for the charges under [STATUTE] , but they have not been sentenced to prison, rather they have been released on due admonition in exercise of powers under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. Learned counsel appearing for the accused opposite Patna High Court CR. REV. No.750 of 2009 (3) dt.16-10-2012 2 / 2 2 parties submits that both sides are neighbour and land dispute was going-on between both sides from before and at that time a title suit was also pending, therefore, a false case was lodged by the petitioner. It is contended that the doctor has not fully supported the prosecution case as disclosed in the FIR. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no case for interference is made out. The application stands dismissed. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 323

Statute Text:
Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing hurt. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.