Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23410 of 2012 ====================================================== Santosh Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-07-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . On information, the raid was conducted in the godown of the petitioner and others when bags of damaged cements, empty bags and other articles were recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing was seized to suggest that manufacturing of cement was going on in the godown. It appears that others have been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 10803 of 2012 and Cr. Misc. No. 12925 of 2012. I see no reason for learned Court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 224 of 2011, pending in the Court of learned Chief Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23410 of 2012 (2) dt.10-07-2012 2 / 2 2 Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. With the observations above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.