Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25441 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 25441 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajo Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2 18-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case under [STATUTE] and later on added [STATUTE] . A looted chain was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which was identified by Bimla Mishra the prosecution witness. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one co- accused Manoj Mahto his relative brought the chain. However, it has been submitted that though the recovery of the chain was made from the possession of the petitioner but the petitioner himself was not put on Test Identification Parade for his identification or implication in this case. Though the occurrence is of 07.12.2011, the chain was recovered from the possession of the petitioner on 08.01.2012. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25441 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 The petitioner was remanded in this case on 12.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except this case there is one case against the petitioner. Taking into consideration the custody of the petitioner i.e. 12.01.2012, the petitioner above named is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Rail) Barauni at Begusarai in connection with Bachchwara P. S. Case No. 12 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be the near relative of the petitioner who shall file affidavit to the effect that the petitioner is not involved in any case except these two cases as stated above and shall swear affidavit that the petitioner shall not indulge in any such activity in future and if any involvement of the petitioner in any such activity shall be reported to the court concerned then the trial court shall proceed for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner. Kundan/- (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.