Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1323 of 2012 Karunesh Ujjwal Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of committing theft. It is submitted that for the occurrence of 24.08.2009 the complaint was filed on 23.05.2009. Subsequently it was transferred under Section 156(3) Cr. P.C. to the police when the accusation was found false and final form was submitted. The cognizance has been taken on protest. It is submitted that petitioner’s side has also filed case against the informant since there was dispute between the parties with regard to the vehicle. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or 2 surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. C- 1/1780 of 2009 arising out of Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 297 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.