Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11566 of 2012 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh & Ors. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and ¾ of the D. P. Act. It is alleged that informant negotiated marriage of his daughter with petitioner no.1 Rahul Kumar Singh when Rs. 2,00,000/- was paid to the petitioners and Rs. 1,00,000/- was spent in preparation of marriage. Subsequently, the accused persons demanded Rs. 2,50,000/- more and on non- payment of the same, the marriage was not performed. It is submitted that there is no proof with regard to payment and for accusation of 25.04.2011 F.I.R. was lodged on 04.09.2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11566 of 2012 (2) dt.06-04-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioners, Rahul Kumar Singh, Pramila Devi alias Pramila Kuar, Braj Bhushan Singh and Awadhesh Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Desari P.S. Case No. 174 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Hazipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.