Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17033 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17033 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sunita Devi W/O Latoran Mahto Resident Of Village- Sherghar, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is stated that from the first information report itself it appears that save and except wild suspicion and hypothetical presumption made by the informant, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Priyanka Kumari has already been granted bail by order dated 19.3.2012 passed in Cr.Appeal No.4841 of 2012 by another Bench of this court. Be that as it may, considering the aforesaid, the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17033 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No.77 of 2011 (G.R. No.637 of 2011) subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that she shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If she wants to remain absent, then she shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, she shall immediately inform the court and request that she may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 328

Statute Text:
Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code. Administering stupefying drug with intent to cause hurt, etc. Whoever administers to or causes to be taken by any person any poison or any stupefying, intoxicating or unwholesome drug, or other thing with intent to cause hurt to such person, or with intent to commit or to facilitate the commission of an offence or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.