Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1079 of 2010 ====================================================== Deo Narain Mandal, son of Khushi Lal Mandal, resident of Village Belha, P.S. Phulparas, District Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shankar Mandal, son of Ram Ratan Mandal 3. Jagdeo Mandal, son of Kahtar Mandal 4. Thakai Mandal, son of Neba Lal Mandal 5. RamSevak Mandal, son of Ram Ratan Mandal 6. Kameshwar Mandal, son of Thakai Mandal 7. Bhubneshwar Mandal, son of Ram Ratan Mandal, all residents of village Belha, P.s. Phulparas, District Madhubani .... .... Opposite party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate For the State of Bihar : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, Addl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-08-2012 Heard. With respect to an occurrence having taken place on 14.7.1981, the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 7 were put on trial. By the impugned judgment dated 15.5.2010 passed in Sessions trial No. 82 of 1986 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-V, Madhubani, the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 7 have been convicted for charges under Sections 147,148,323 and 324/34of the Indian penal Code and instead of sentencing them to prison, they have been released on due admonition in exercise of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1079 of 2010 (2) dt.02-08-2012 2 / 2 2 powers under Section 3 of The Probation of Offenders Act. However, on the basis of the materials available on the record, the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 7 have been found not guilty for charges under [STATUTE] and have been accordingly acquitted for said charges. After having heard the parties, this Court does not find any glaring perversity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned trial court warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the application fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. Kanth/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 326

Statute Text:
Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 335, voluntarily causes grievous hurt by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing or cutting, or any instrument which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive substance, or by means of any explosive substance, or by means of any substance which it is deleterious to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive into the blood, or by means of any animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.