Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8834 of 2011 (2) dt.26-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8834 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Abid Mian @ Abid Hassan S/O Late Majhar Mian R/O Village - Khajuri, P.S. Kuchaikot, District – Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar and Mr. Dharmveer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 26-06-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 1.8.2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Gopalganj in S.Tr. No. 91/2001 under section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, calling the petitioner to stand the trial. From the F.I.R. it appears that allegation has been made at about 3.00 A.M. her husband awoke up and told that he was going to village Khajuri to Amid Mian for money who had assured the money whereupon the informant had told her deceased husband not to go at this wee hour. The complainant has further stated that her husband had taken bank loan and Bank Officers were taking away her husband but he made request to the Bank Officers to leave him for some time he would return the bank loan. She has stated that her husband had taken money from Samdhi in Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8834 of 2011 (2) dt.26-06-2012 connection of return of bank loan. Amin Khan Samdhi came there for realization of the money but no one of the village was ready to pay the money. From the F.I.R. it has been stated that Bashist had illicit connection with the wife of Abid Mian and as such Bashist always took the visit of husband in bad taste and he used to object. On the fateful day, her husband went to village Khajuri obtained money was going to village of Samdhi to pay the amount to him. After some time, the informant heard that her husband was killed and his body was lying along with cycle. It appears that during the trial PW-1 to 6 have named the petitioner and have given detail of the facts whereupon the court below has exercised the power [STATUTE] view of the matter, this Court does not find any error in the order impugned. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Mahesh/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 319

Statute Text:
Section 319 of the Indian Penal Code. None. Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt.