Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43061 of 2012 (3) dt.17-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43061 of 2012 ====================================================== Manju Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 17-12-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that petitioner in lieu of Rajendra Jha sold the land of the informant in favour of one Md. Hannan. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the father-in-law of this petitioner and the father of the informant are own brothers when the petitioner has sold her share of property. Considering the nature of accusation in the background of relationship between the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43061 of 2012 (3) dt.17-12-2012 in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 36 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.