Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22691 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sanoj Yadav, Son of Uma Shankar Yadav. 2. Lalan Yadav, Son of Mishrilal Yadav. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.22729 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Baleshwar Yadav, Son of Late Mauji Lal Yadav. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2012 Since both the applications arising out of one case are taken up together and being disposed of by this composite order. Supplementary affidavit has been filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the three petitioners, who are languishing in custody, seek bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] and 27 of the Arms Act, are named accused in this case arising out of some land dispute with allegation of using force and taking away some articles. Submission is of false implication and prior to the occurrence, one of the petitioner, namely, Baleshwar Yadav has already filed Complaint Case No. 1623/2011 against the prosecution side and under almost similarly situated circumstance, co-accused, namely, Bhagwan Yadav has already been Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22691 of 2012 (2) dt.13-07-2012 2 / 2 2 released on bail vide order dated 25/01/2012 passed by another Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 3765/2012. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Town P.S. Case No. 565/2011, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 506

Statute Text:
Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal intimidation. Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both; If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc — and if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, of with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute unchastity to a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.