Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42814 of 2012 (2) dt.11-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42814 of 2012 ====================================================== Hari Nandan Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 11.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 11.5.2012 in a case registered under [STATUTE] and 17 of the CLA Act. Neither petitioner is named in the first information report nor any recovery has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of this petitioner came in this case on 12.4.2012 when the statements of two witnesses were recorded and the aforesaid witnesses claimed to have seen the petitioner committing the alleged crime. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Hari Nandan Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Adhoc. Addl. Sessions Judge I, Munger in Sessions trial no. 594/2012 arising out of Haveli Kharagpur P.S. Case no. 298/2010. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.