Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37732 of 2012 (2) dt.03-10-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37732 of 2012 ====================================================== Nagdeo Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-10-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the informant purchased the land in question through compromise decree when the land was in possession of the informant’s daughter but subsequently accused Nanhak Sah executed saledeed with regard to the said land in favour of Amirchand Sah. It is further alleged that the assault was made and informant’s gold chain was snatched. It is submitted that Nanhak Sah and Amirchand Sah are not petitioners before this court. Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against Nanhak and Amirchand Sah, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37732 of 2012 (2) dt.03-10-2012 surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 60 of 2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.