Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5932 of 2012 ====================================================== Ranju Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 05-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. On the confession of co-accused Satyam the name of the petitioner and her husband sprang up. From the house of the petitioner the fake railway tickets, arms and ammunitions were recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that her husband has also been made accused in this case, who has been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 38168 of 2010. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5932 of 2012 (3) dt.05-04-2012 2/2 I see no reason for the learned court below not to give same privilege to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 47 of 2010 pending in the court of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) . .

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.