Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20868 of 2012 ====================================================== Koushik Shukla .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-07-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . Accusation against the petitioner is of giving farsa blow on the head of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that both sides are neighbors and there is counter version of the occurrence also, whereas it is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that injury is on the scalp and considering the size of the injury the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the fact that accusation of repetition of blow is not levelled against the petitioner and there is counter version of the occurrence also, it is a fit case for consideration of regular bail, if the petitioner surrenders within Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20868 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 2 / 2 2 a period of six weeks in connection with Uchakagaon P.S. Case No. 50 of 2012, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj. With the observations above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through Fax to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.