Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43091 of 2011 (4) dt.01-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43091 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Basant Ram son of Sidh Nath Ram R/O,Vill.-Bharatpura,P.S.-Dulhin Bazar,Dist.-Patna 2. Shyam Lal Mochi son of Ram Swaroop Mochi, both R/O,Vill.- Bharatpura,P.S.-Dulhin Bazar,Dist.-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 4. 01-03-2012. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Bikram P.S.Case No.264 of 2003 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , section 27 of the Arms Act and section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The involvement of these petitioners in the occurrence in which the son of the informant was shot dead while attending a clinic of doctor, is that they were allegedly found standing near the dead body of the deceased shouting slogans in support of extremists organization. Learned counsel submits that apart from the said instance, there is no material connecting these petitioners to the alleged occurrence and that they have clean antecedent. Regard being had to the submissions of the learned Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43091 of 2011 (4) dt.01-03-2012 counsel, let the petitioners (1) Basant Ram and (2) Shyam Lal Mochi be released on bail upon each one of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Danapur in connection with Bikram P.S.Case No.264 of 2003 subject to the following conditions : (a) that the petitioners will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail bonds will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse; (b) that the petitioners shall ensure their representation before the court below on each and every date fixed in the case and the failure on the part of the petitioners to ensure their representation before the court below on two consecutive dates fixed in the case without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, would entitle the court concerned to cancel the bail bonds of the defaulting petitioner(s) and to take them/him into custody. ahk/- (Jyoti Saran, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 247

Statute Text:
Section 247 of the Indian Penal Code. Fraudulently diminishing the weight or altering the composition of Indian coin. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly performs on any Indian coin any operation which diminishes the weight or alters the composition of that coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.