Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38078 of 2011 ====================================================== Ram Naresh Prasad Yadav, son of late Ram Chandar Yadav, resident of village – Laxmipur, P.S. – Mufasil, District – East Champaran, Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Pd. Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Pd. Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 02-03-2012 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of defalcation of huge amount part of which now has already been deducted from his salary. Further petitioner undertakes to deposit the remaining amount, as mentioned in Annexure – 2, i.e. Rs. 2.05,000/- within eight weeks. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, subject to deposit of the amount before the authority or court, in Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38078 of 2011 (3) dt.02-03-2012 2 / 2 2 the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within eight weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 56/1990, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.