Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14956 of 2012 (2) dt.10-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14956 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Anshu Kumar Singh S/O Shiv Chandra Singh Resident Of Village- Ganga Pipar, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is contended that the petitioner is neither named in the first information report nor anything incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He has been remanded to judicial custody on 29.1.2012 on suspicion and in the whole investigation save and except confessional statement recorded before the police, there is no other material to connect him with the alleged offence. Till date he has not been put on test identification parade. The investigation is over and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14956 of 2012 (2) dt.10-04-2012 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Motihari Mufassil P.S. Case No. 29 of 2012 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.