Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40750 of 2012 ====================================================== Madan Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 26-11-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 20 of 2005 registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and Section 18(c), 18(a)(vi) read with Section 65(17), 65(18) and 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. From the house of one Naresh Prasad, stolen and physician sample of medicine were recovered. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, his name subsequently sprang on the confession of the co-accused. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that other accused Awadesh Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail Vide Cr. Misc. No. 35714 of 2008. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40750 of 2012 (2) dt.26-11-2012 2/2 weeks. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.