Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19641 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Binod Kumar Yadav @ Bhola Yadav S/O Biranchi Yadav Resident Of Village- Yogidih, P.S.- Khoda Bandpur, District- Begusarai.... .... ……………………… ………………………………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 23-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for grant of bail to the petitioner in Baheri P.S. Case 250 of 2011 registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] and subsequently [STATUTE] have also been added. The allegation relates to the theft and recovery of Bolero jeep. It is submitted that during investigation the name of other accused including the petitioner has appeared. The Bolero jeep has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Ashok Kumar Yadav. Save and except the confessional statement of co- accused nothing is against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged offence. The petitioner has been in custody since 29.12.2011. It is further submitted that in a similar facts and circumstances of the case co-accused Shambhu Prasad Singh has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19641 of 2012 (2) dt.23-05-2012 2/2 14895 of 2012. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 250 of 2011 with the following conditions: 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody. RPS/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.