Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31046 of 2012 (2) dt.16-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31046 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Mumtaz .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02. 16-08-2012 Heard. This is petition for regular bail for offence punishable under [STATUTE] . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. is against unknown. However, from the order of the Sessions Judge no one has seen the petitioner at the time of occurrence. However, witnesses in paragraph 70 and 86 of the case diary have stated that they have seen the petitioner going towards the shop of the informant. Co-accused Jagdish Kumar @ Jidtendra Kumar has confessed his guilt and disclosed the name of the petitioner in his confessional statement. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2012. S.Sb/- (Gopal Prasad, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.