Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21435 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ram Lagan Chaudhary, S/o Kishori Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla- Belquri, P.S- Sadar, District- Purnea. 2. Sanjay Chaudhary, S/o Pratosh Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla- Rajragi Tola (Malanpura), Khushkibagh, P.S- Sadar, District- Purnea. 3. Fool Pari Devi, W/o Basudeo Paswan, Resident of Village- Abdula Nagar (Naya Tola), P.S.-Sadar, District- Purnea. 4. Dhiraj Kumar Singh @ Shiraj Singh, S/o Ramdeo Pd. Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Hansda Road, Gulabnagh, P.S- Sadar, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-06-2012 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case instituted under [STATUTE] . It is contended that save and except [STATUTE] , all other sections are bailbale in nature. Several other co-accused, namely, Prabhat Prasad Yadav, Ramesh Das, Mangan Yadav, Md. Reyazuddin, Jitendra Uraon and Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42988 of 2011, Cr. Misc. No. 40305 of 2011, Cr. Misc. No. 39724 of 2011, Cr. Misc. No. 35065 of 2011, Cr. Misc. No. 35015 of 2011 and Cr. Misc. No. 33785 of 2011 by different benches of this Court. The case of the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21435 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioners stand on identical footing to that of the other co-accused who have been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 188 of 2011 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they will immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through their counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.