Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33722 of 2012 ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Dilip Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 05-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the informant executed registered power of attorney in favour of the petitioner for operating the crusher industry when the petitioner was liable for the income and loss when the petitioner failed to deposit the required amount in the Mining Department. Considering the accusation arising out of the contractual nature of relationship between the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33722 of 2012 (2) dt.05-09-2012 2/2 learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kashimbazar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.