Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19546 of 2012 ====================================================== Jitan Safi , Son of Sri Ravi Safi, Resident of village Majhaura, Polilce Station laukaha, district- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.20107 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Rezaul , Son of Md. Pachakauri Ansari, Resident of village and P.O- Barhara, Polilce Station Babubarhi, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s For the Petitioner ………………………………Santosh Kumar For the State ……………………………… Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 02 22-05-2012 Cr. Misc. No.19546 of 2012 and Cr. Misc. No.20107 of 2012 arise out of Laukaha P.S. Case No.79 of 2010 registered under [STATUTE] . and as such; both these applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P for the State. It is submitted that in similar facts and circumstance, the co-accused Chandeshwar Mandal has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc.18083 of 2012 and the case of the petitioners are on better footing. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19546 of 2012 (02) dt.22-05-2012 2 Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners while opposing their prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above- named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in Laukaha P.S.Case No. 79/2010 with the following conditions: 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners. 2. The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioners will be well represented in the Court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned and they will be taken into custody. Namita/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.