Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.160 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of committing theft of motorcycle. Subsequently, the alleged motorcycle was recovered from possession of petitioner for which a separate case under [STATUTE] . was registered in which the petitioner is on bail. It is submitted that the petitioner purchased the motorcycle without knowing the fact that it was stolen motorcycle and on that ground the petitioner was granted bail. It is orally submitted that apart from the present case the petitioner is not involved in any other case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.