Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25370 of 2012 (2) dt.09-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25370 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Mehraj Khan S/o Akhtar Khan @ Tinkori Khan 2. Wajul Khan S/o Late Atim Khan .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 09.07.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner no.1 is in custody since 3.3.2012 and petitioner no.2 is in custody since 13.11.2011 in connection with alleged offence under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 138 of 2011. 3. The allegation is with regard to snatching of Nokia mobile phone, cash, etc. from the informant and his three friends by one named and three unknown persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have been falsely implicated in this case only on the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Sangala, but no recovery whatsoever has been made from their possession nor they have been put on Test Identification Parade. It is further stated that the said co-accused Md. Sangala has been granted bail by this Court vide order Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25370 of 2012 (2) dt.09-07-2012 dated 3.7.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22688 of 2012. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 138 of 2011 on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioners will not indulge themselves in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioners. (iii) The petitioners will be well represented on each and every date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. Fahad. (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.