Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16070 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Suraji Yadav 2. Asharfi Yadav 3. Sugan Yadav @ Sudami Yadav 4. Girdhari Yadav 5. Tuntun Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 07-05-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 3/4 of Explosive Substances Act. The accusation is of exploding bomb on the house of the informant. The petitioners were named in the first information report but during investigation the accusation was found false and final form was submitted but differing with the same cognizance has been taken in the matter on 23.12.2011. Considering the fact that during investigation the accusation was found false, let the above named Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16070 of 2012 (2) dt.07-05-2012 2/2 petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Simultalla P.S. Case No. 31 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 148

Statute Text:
Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting armed with deadly Weapon. Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.