Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2978 of 2012 1. Chandan Kumar. 2. Anmol Kumar, both are son of Uma Shankar Das @ Umi Das, resident of village – Chakbijagani, P. S. – Hajipur Sadar, District – Vaishali. ............. Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ............ Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for the offence under [STATUTE] with regard to the theft of a chain. However, one Kallu Mahto was caught in connection with the said theft and on his confessional statement the name of the petitioner brought who has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35523 of 2011. The petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2011. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway 2 Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, Distt. - Saran in connection with Rail Muzaffarpur P. S. Case No. 50 of 2011. Kundan (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.