Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12215 of 2012 (3) dt.18-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12215 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Munna Shekh S/O Shekh Ahmad R/O Vill-Rohai, P.S.Karpi, Distt-Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 18-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] against 10-15 unknown accused persons It is stated that in course of investigation the petitioner was remanded in this case on 20.1.2012. Till date he has not been put on T.I.Parade. He has got no criminal antecedent. The only material which the police could collect is recovery of mobile which is said to be a looted one. However, the mobile in question has also not been put on T.I.Parade. By order dated 21.3.2012 case diary was summoned. The case diary has been received. Referring to the case diary, it is submitted that immediately upon arrest the petitioner disclosed that he had purchased the said mobile from one Nanhe Mian. When Nanhe Mian was apprehended he admitted this fact that it was he who had delivered the mobile in question to him. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12215 of 2012 (3) dt.18-04-2012 Be that as it may, considering the aforesaid the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 262 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.