Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41620 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Nakul Prasad, Son of Late Samu Mahto. 2. Rahul Kumar, Son of Nakul Prasad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 26-11-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Both the petitioners seek bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] misusing the privilege of bail granted earlier. Taking into consideration the liberty granted by the trial court itself and submission of an undertaking to be physically present on each and every date fixed, subject to filing an undertaking to the effect above, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Smt. Reshma Verma, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 1970(C)/2000, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.