Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6352 of 2012 ====================================================== Chandan Yadav son of Rajendra Yadav, R/o village Kariyat, P.S.Sonbarsa, Dist. Saharsa ... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhim Kr. Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s Mr. A.m.P. Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused in Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 37 of 2010 registered under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that during the investigation it has come to light that the petitioner has committed theft of a motorcycle. It is further submitted that stolen motorcycle has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Manoj Yadav. It is further submitted that similarly situated accused has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.1.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1318 of 2012. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the bail application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri C.K. Thakur, J.M. Ist class, Saharsa in Sonbersa Raj P.S. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6352 of 2012 (2) dt.10-02-2012 2 / 2 2 Case no. 37 of 2010 subject to the conditions: (a) That one of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. (b) That petitioner will not indulge in any other offences (c) That he will be well represented before the trial court on each and every date and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make his pairvi, his bail bond would be cancelled by the concerned trial court and he will be taken into custody. M.Rahman/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.