Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24312 of 2012 (3) dt.01-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24312 of 2012 ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar, son of Sailendra Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 01-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] , Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is solitary named accused in this case with allegation of getting a sum of Rs. 7250/- credited in his account from a different place and thereafter making an attempt to withdraw the amount but it was failed and reportedly amount credited was not of the petitioner. From the statement of account imposed an filed with supplementary affidavit, it also appears that earlier on 16.3.2012, a sum of Rs. 6250/- was Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24312 of 2012 (3) dt.01-08-2012 deposited in his account out of which 6200/- was withdrawn on the same day through ATM and there is no dispute regarding this deposit. Further, petitioner has no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 42 of 2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 467

Statute Text:
Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery of a valuable security, will or authority to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive any money, etc. Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security or a will, or an authority to adopt a son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive the principal, interest or dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any money, movable property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be an acquittance or receipt acknowledging the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the delivery of any movable property or valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.