Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42884 of 2011 Om Prakash S/O Arun Prasad Singh R/O Vill. Minika Bishanpur Chand P.S. Mushahari, Distt. Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2.Shyam Kishore Singh S/O Sri Janardhan Prasad Singh R/O Vill. Gangapur, P.S. Mushahari, Distt. Muzaffarpur At Present R/O Vill. Kanhauli, P.S. Mithanpura, Distt. Muzaffarpur. ---------------------------------- 2. 10.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mushahari P.S.Case No.07 of 2011 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the land belongs to the petitioner nor the assurance was given by him. He submits that even while the allegation was directed against the co- accused husband and wife by mere presence of the petitioner at the relevant time, he has been roped in the presence case. Regard being had to the submissions of the learned counsel, let the petitioner, Om Prakash be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2 the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahari P.S.Case No.07 of 2011. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.