Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20451 of 2012 ====================================================== Dayanidhi Singh S/O Late Satyadeo Singh Resident Of Mohalla- Saketnagar, Police Station- Sasaram, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Shree Dilip Kumar Singh S/O Late Kulbansh Narayan Singh Resident Of Village- Jamuhar, Police Station- Dehri On Sone, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 03-12-2012 The notices were issued to the opposite party no. 2 on 13.07.2012. On 07.09.2012, the matter was adjourned for 08.10.2012 when on 05.11.2012 the matter was adjourned for today as a last indulgence. Today also, none is appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioner being the Managing Director of the Company was supplied the stone materials worth Rs.1,20,00,000/- when a cheque Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20451 of 2012 (5) dt.03-12-2012 2 / 2 2 was issued which got bounced. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the cheque was issued on behalf of the company as authorized signatory and the Money Suit No. 26/2012 has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Considering the accusation arising out of contractual relationship between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1411 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 138

Statute Text:
Section 138 of the Indian Penal Code. Abetment of act of insubordination by an officer, soldier, sailor or airman, if the offence be committed in consequence. Whoever abets what he knows to be an act of insubordination by an officer, soldier, sailor or airman, in the Army, Navy or air Force, of the Government of India, shall, if such act of insubordination be committed in consequence of that abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.