Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44110 of 2011 (2) dt.09-02-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44110 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Nematul Fatma @ Nematul Fatima W/O Sohail Ahmad Resident Of - Shamsher Nagar, Wasepur, P.S.- Bhulli, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand). 2. Sohail Ahmad S/O Najrul Haque Resident Of - Shamsher Nagar, Wasepur, P.S.- Bhulli, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 09.02.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering that the petitioners are the parents-in-law of the informant, let the petitioners, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 422 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44110 of 2011 (2) dt.09-02-2012 2 with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.