Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17004 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17004 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chunnu Singh S/O Ashish Singh Resident Of Village- Barkikopa, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is stated that the present case has been instituted at the instance of a co-villager namely Ram Singh, who is on inimical term with the petitioner. It has further been contended that all the sections are bailable except section 307 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation of firing at the son of the informant has deliberately been made with a view to make the offence non-bailable though no firearm injury has been caused to any person. Admittedly, assault has been made with the butt of the pistol. Thus, it is contended that neither [STATUTE] nor section 27 of the Arms Act would be attracted. Be that as it may, considering the facts and Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17004 of 2012 (2) dt.24-04-2012 circumstances of the case the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 263 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 448

Statute Text:
Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code. House-trespass. Whoever commits house-trespass shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.