Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23447 of 2012 (2) dt.10-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23447 of 2012 ====================================================== Fuzi @ Gautam Kumar, son of Shrikant Prasad, R/o – village – Kalinagar, Jehanabad Court, P.S. – Jehanabad, Distt. – Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 10-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody since 12.04.2012 for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The petitioner is solitary named accused in this case on being apprehended under suspicious circumstances with some articles at the end of railway platform. Submission is of false implication except petitioner carries altogether five cases against him bearing case nos. (1) Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 13/2006 dated 24.01.2006 under [STATUTE] . (2) Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 23/2006 dated 2.2.2006 under Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23447 of 2012 (2) dt.10-07-2012 [STATUTE] . (3) Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 8/2007 dated 4.1.2007 under [STATUTE] . (4) Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 29/2008 dated 2.2.2008 under [STATUTE] . (5) Jehanabad Rail P.S. Case No. 28/2010 dated 379/411/34 I.P.C. Neither the articles were put on T.I.P. nor there is any material to show them being stolen one. Having facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of petitioner having no other case except detailed above wherein, as submitted, he is on bail, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Tripathi, Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Jehanabad Rail P.S. Case No. 56/2011, with condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.