Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40064 of 2012 (2) dt.08-11-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40064 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Manoj Kumar Singh S/O Ram Dayal Singh R/O Village - Nawada Ben, Police Station - Udwantnagar, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 08-11-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Session Trial No. 150 of 2005 arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 86 of 1994 registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that the petitioner was granted bail vide order dated 15.06.2004. Thereafter he went outside entrusting pairvi of the case to the pairvikar but due to non making of pairvi his bail bond was cancelled on 15.09.2005. Later on he came to know about cancellation of bail. As such he surrendered on 18.09.2012 in Session Trial No. 150 of 2005. It is submitted that there is no deliberate laches on the part of the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to remain present on each and every date in the court till disposal of the trial. Charges have also been framed on 21.09.2012. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40064 of 2012 (2) dt.08-11-2012 the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Arrah in Sessions Trial No. 150 of 2005 arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 86/94 with the following conditions : 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody. Amin/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 436

Statute Text:
Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house etc. Whoever commits mischief by fire or any explosive substance, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause the destruction of any building which is ordinarily used as a place of worship or as a human dwelling or as a place for the custody of property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.