Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2508 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Janak Deo Singh 2. Liyakat Hussain .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioner no.1 being the uncle of the informant sold the informant’s share of land to petitioner no.2 and when the informant went to enquire then he was abused and assaulted. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.1 sold the land of his share for valid consideration and no case has been filed for cancellation of the sale deed till date. Considering the accusation arising out of the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2508 of 2012 (2) dt.31-01-2012 2 / 2 2 property dispute, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhawrah P.S. Case No. 261 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.