Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46985 of 2012 ====================================================== Sanoj Kumar, son of Nagina Yadav, resident of village Kondi, P.S. Pandarak, district Patna .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2 14-12-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under [STATUTE] . The first information report is against unknown. However, there is allegation that the miscreants looted the motorcycle, Rs.3,000/- cash and mobile set. However, during the investigation the petitioner arrested with the motorcycle. The co- accused, who apprehended, confessed the guilt and on which basis the looted motorcycle recovered from his possession. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the only material against the petitioner is the confessional statement of the co-accused. The petitioner is in jail since 23.06.2012. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 46 of 2012 to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Jha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh, Patna. SA/- (Gopal Prasad, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.