Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30198 of 2011 Ranjit Yadav, S/O-Chandradeo Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03 05.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody in a case registered under [STATUTE] but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner has been roped in this case on account of village politics because the informant being inhabitant of another village is not expected to disclose the parentage and address of the petitioner and moreover, petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly, keeping in mind that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 81 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.