Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.151 of 2012 Sanjay Rai Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 10.01.2012. Heard Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. C. Jawahar, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from the petitioner and other co- accused who was put on T. I. Parade has been acquitted since the informant has not supported the case. It has been mentioned in the impugned order that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Chairraiya P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.