Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.870 of 2012 ====================================================== Aman Raj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 01-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was declared successful in Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive (Medical) Examination, 2010 but at the time of counselling, the handwriting of the petitioner did not tally with the handwriting made at the OMR sheet when it was suspected that someone else appeared at the examination in place of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that without verifying the discrepancies from the expert, the case has been lodged. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.870 of 2012 (3) dt.01-03-2012 2 / 2 2 Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 94 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.