Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24362 of 2012 (3) dt.23-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24362 of 2012 ====================================================== Ajaharuddin Mian, son of Meru Mian .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 23-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The petitioner is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of exchange of ATM Cards during transaction and subsequent transferring of his money during personal inquiries/investigation made by the informant before lodging the case. Submission is of false implication having no material and petitioner himself has already been cheated, had it not been so, it was not possible for him to hand over his own ATM Card in lieu of card of the informant. Moreover, investigation indicates that no valid attempt is made to get the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24362 of 2012 (3) dt.23-08-2012 photographs compared with the CCTV Camera installed in the ATM. Charge-sheet has been submitted against petitioner, though, investigation is kept pending against others. Further, petitioner is in custody having no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimoor at Bhabhua, in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 251 of 2011, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further, prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of the privilege granted to the petitioner, if at all, during pending investigation or at any subsequent stage, anything specific emerges against the petitioner. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.