Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42670 of 2011 (3) dt.06-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42670 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Naiyar .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 07.02.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 22.8.2011 in a case registered under [STATUTE] . The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is vendor and, as a matter of fact, earlier he was made accused in nine cases but after depositing fine, petitioner was discharged from the aforesaid cases and the police again roped the petitioner in the present false case. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Md Naiyer, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Samastipur Rail P.S. Case no. 48/2011. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.