Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21909 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ashok Kumar Yadav 2. Arun Kumar 3. Ravindra Kumar Aman .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 25-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that on the forged training certificate petitioners got appointed on contract basis as Agriculture Advisor. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have not received any payment and have deposited the security of Rs.80,000/-. It is further submitted that considering the nature of accusation others have been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21909 of 2012 (3) dt.25-07-2012 2/2 named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 240 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.