Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49021 of 2012 (2) dt.18-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49021 of 2012 ====================================================== Sant Saran Upadhyay .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 18-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this case, the petitioner is making a prayer for regular bail in connection Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 63/2010 for offence under [STATUTE] . There is an allegation in the FIR, in the Mid night 8 to 10 accused persons entered into the house and committed dacoity. The petitioner was identified by the villager. Looking to the nature of allegation, and criminal antecedent, the petitioner does not deserve to be granted bail at this stage. However, the petitioner will have a liberty to renew the prayer for bail after nine months. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Mahesh/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.