Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11533 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Rahul Choudhary @ Doma Choudhary @ Doma 2. Sarashwati Devi. 3. Dipak Choudhary. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in Korha P.S. Case No. 390 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] , Section 47(a) (f), 48(g) of the Excise Act and Section 2(E), 13, 15 and 18 of the Bihar Mahua Flower Act pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar. Considering the nature of recovery from the hutment of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.