Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21577 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Anwar Alam @ Gulteni Mian S/O Wazir Mian R/O Village - Champapur Tola, Purshotiampur, P.S. Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. D.P. Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-06-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is stated that it would be apparent from the First Information Report that co-accused Wazir Mian is the sole assailant of the deceased. The petitioner together with co- accused Monsaf Mian alias Munsaf Mina was also present at the time of occurrence. Co-accused Monsaf Mian alias Munsaf Mina having identical allegation to that of the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail by order dated 24.4.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No.14161 of 2012 by Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21577 of 2012 (2) dt.12-06-2012 2 / 3 2 another bench of this Court. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 95 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21577 of 2012 (2) dt.12-06-2012 3 / 3 3 compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he will immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Vinay/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 320

Statute Text:
Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code. None. The following kinds of hurt only are designated as "grievous": Emasculation. Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear. Privation of any member or joint. Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint. Permanent disfiguration of the head or face. Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth. Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty days in severe bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits.