Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9009 of 2012 (2) dt.12-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9009 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Zakir @ Zakir Hussain .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of sanctioning twice under the Indira Aawas Scheme. It is alleged against the petitioner that the same favour was made to the petitioner’s wife. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner divorced his wife in the year 2001 when the amount was sanctioned in the year 2010-2011. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9009 of 2012 (2) dt.12-03-2012 Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Darbhanga Sadar P.S.case No.377 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. B.Kr./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.