Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44795 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Jildar Rai 2. Pappoo Rai @ Pappu Kumar Singh. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 2 02-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the relations of the complainant are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case filed under [STATUTE] . The accusation is that the petitioners on some pretext got the sale deed executed from the complainant’s mother. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the sale deed was executed for valid considerations and the nature of accusation is of absolutely civil nature. Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 284/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.