Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7110 of 2011 (2) dt.25-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7110 of 2011 ====================================================== Umesh Pal, Rajendra Prasad Pal, resident of Village- Zamariya, Police Station-Shambhuganj, District- Banka, at present residing of Mohalla- Karhariya, ward No.1/6, P.S. Banka, District- Banka .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2. Arjun Turi, son of late Makeshar Turi 3. Dhiraj Turi, son of Arjun Turi 4. Ranjeet Turi, son of Arjun Turi 5. Sanjeet Turi, son of Arjun Turi 6. Rampyari Devi, wife of Arjun Turi 7. Om Prakash Gupta, son of late Prasadi Sah, all resident of Village- Karhariya, Ward No.1/6, P.S. Banka, District- Banka. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 25-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.IV, Banka in Cr. Revision No.175 of 2009 whereby and whereunder he has dismissed the revision application which has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 19.2.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka in Complaint case No.1668 of 2005 by which he has rejected the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7110 of 2011 (2) dt.25-04-2012 has filed application before the court below that he ought to have taken cognizance under [STATUTE] which was rejected and again the same was challenged before the revisional court in revision and the same was also rejected. During trial if any such evidence would come constituting offence under [STATUTE] , the petitioner will have liberty to file an application before the court below and if the court below is satisfied that the materials are available he will pass an order in accordance with law. This application is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.