Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38491 of 2009 (3) dt.23-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38491 of 2009 ====================================================== Sri Krishna Prasad Mehtha, Son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Mehtha, R/o Village Malinagar, P.S. Chakmehsi, District Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Hare Krishna Mehtha, S/o Late Bindeshwari Mehtha 3. Jai Shankar Prasad, S/o Hare Krishna Mehtha 4. Bharatendu Kumar, S/o Hare Krishna Mehtha 5. Sulo Devi, W/o S/o Hare Krishna Mehtha 6. Premnath Bajpay, S/o Late Hanuman Pd. Bajpaiya 7. Anand Prakash Sharma, S/o Late Ram Kankas Sharma, All resident of village Malinagar, P.S. Chakmehsi, Dist. Samastipur 8. Indu Devi, W/o Ram Sevak Mehtaha, R/o village Nehra, P.S. Sakari, Dist. Madhubani 9. Md. Allauddin Khan, S/o not known, R/o Village Akhtiyarpur, Chandauli, P.S. Chakmehsi, Dist. Samastipur 10. Jivan Prasad Mehtha, S/o not known, R/o Village Mu. Hathi Chawk (Nagar), Dist. Muzaffarpur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rub, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3. 23.3.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Samastipur in Criminal Revision No.559 of 2008, by which the order dated 6.9.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Samastipur in Complaint case No.718 of 2007, by which it had dismissed the complaint, has been affirmed. Considering that this is the second revision in the garb of an application [STATUTE] inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 482

Statute Text:
Section 482 of the Indian Penal Code. Using a false property mark with intent to deceive or injure any person. Whoever uses any false property mark shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.