Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8451 of 2011 ====================================================== Brij Kishor Sharma @ Brij Kishor Singh, S/o Nageshwar Singh, resident of village-Mokar, P.S. Jehanabad, District-Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 07. 13-03-2012 Heard the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 141of 1998 / 16 of 2010 arising from Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 258 of 1993 for offence punishable under [STATUTE] and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The F.I.R. is against 200 to 250 members of an extremist organization who have been charged with gunning down the deceased Bharat Singh, his son Fekan Singh and the daughter Ranju Devi and whereafter they also beheaded Fekan Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the occurrence is an outcome of a long standing land dispute between the parties and that although the son and daughter-in-law of the deceased Bharat Singh has identified the petitioner as being a member of the unlawful assembly but no specific overt act has Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8451 of 2011 (7) dt.13-03-2012 2 been assigned to him and for which allegation the petitioner has been in custody since 18.08.2010. It is submitted that apart from the present case the petitioner is also involved in one other case registered in the year 1997. Regard being had to the submissions of learned counsel and the materials on record, let the petitioner Brij Kishor Sharma @ Brij Kishor Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad in connection with Sessions Trial No. 141of 1998 / 16 of 2010 arising from Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 258 of 1993 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall ensure his representation before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the case and the failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, would entitle the court concerned to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and to take him into custody. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 427

Statute Text:
Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief, and thereby causing damage to the amount of 50 rupees or upwards. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.