Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5416 of 2011 (2) dt.29-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5416 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Mohib & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 29-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are challenging the order of cognizance dated 27th March 2010 against the petitioners in Nathnagar (Kajaraili) P.S.Case No. 263 of 1989 for the offences [STATUTE] titioners submits that the incident is of 1989 and after long delay, on the direction of DI.G., Bhagalpur the case was reopened and on that basis charge-sheet was submitted and the court below has taken cognizance. I do not find any error in the order. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to raise all the points at the relevant stage. Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.