Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18568 of 2012 (2) dt.16-05-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18568 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Taiyab, son of late Bauku Miya @ Bali Miya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 16-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The petitioner is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of taking away son of the informant to provide some job after periodical payment and refused to pay anything and the boy never returned. Submission is of false implication and even after submission of charge-sheet the victim appeared and his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has been recorded in G.R. Case No. 28/2012 on 15th of March 2012 in the court of Sri Ashutosh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa. But the same does not find mention in the order of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18568 of 2012 (2) dt.16-05-2012 Additional Sessions Judge refusing the prayer rather it is mentioned that the victim is yet to be traced out. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, subject to verification and confirmation of recovery as well as statement of the victim said to be recorded on 15th March 2012 as aforesaid, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 02/2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.