Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28323 of 2012 (2) dt.07-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28323 of 2012 ====================================================== Jay Deep Nandi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 07.08.2012 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 11.5.2012 in a case registered under [STATUTE] . Allegedly, petitioner along with co-accused Samir Sen was caught with stolen vehicle and some forged documents were recovered from their conscious possession. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that the seized vehicle belongs to one Arnome Sah but investigating officer, in course of investigation, did not record the statement of above stated Arnome Sah and having more or less similar allegation co-accused Samir Sen has already been granted privilege of bail by Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in B.P. no. 808/2012. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Jay Deep Nandi, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case no. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28323 of 2012 (2) dt.07-08-2012 374/2012. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.