Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9208 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9208 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Kisto Paswan S/O Jitan Paswan @ Ram Jatan Paswan Resident Chandramandi, P.S.- Chandramandi, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . The case was registered against unknown. In course of investigation name of the petitioner transpired in confessional statement of co-accused Lalchand Das. He has been taken into custody on 16.11.2011. Till date he has not been put on T.I.Parade. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. Co-accused Lalchand Das on whose confessional statement the petitioner’s name transpired in course of investigation has already been granted bail by another Bench of this court in Cr.Misc. No.9117 of 2011. Two other co-accused persons, namely, Shankar Ravidas @ Shankar Das and Sukhdeo Kahar @ Sukhdeo Ram who are similarly situated have also been granted bail another Bench of this court by order dated 19.5.2011 passed in Cr.Misc. No.9918 of 2011. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9208 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul, Lakhisarai in connection with Jhajha Rail P.S. Case No.30 of 2010 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.