Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3211 of 2012 ====================================================== Yogendra Yadav & Anr. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 2 01-02-2012 Petitioner No. 1 being Panchayat Secretary and petitioner No. 2 being son of petitioner No. 1 are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that petitioner No. 1 transmitted 56 beneficiaries list of Koshi Punarvas Yojana without being approved by Panchayat level committee to the block and the block subsequently transmitted to the district authority. It appears that there is no specific accusation against petitioner No. 2 and considering the health condition of petitioners, learned Sessions Judge considered it to be a fit case for regular bail which gets reflected from the impugned order. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Yogendra Yadav 2. Rajesh Kumar, in the event of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3211 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 2 / 2 2 their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Chousa(Fulaut) P.S. Case No. 113 of 2011. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.