Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39384 of 2012 (2) dt.16-10-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39384 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ram Sanehi Manjhi S/O Chanu Manjhi @ Late Chandra Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 2. Rajesh Manjhi S/O Chanu Manjhi @ Late Chandra Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 3. Ramgyan Manjhi S/O Late Bhanu Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 4. Ramdhayan Manjhi S/O Late Bhanu Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 5. Ram Niwas Manjhi S/O Late Bhanu Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 6. Prantak Manjhi S/O Late Bhanu Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj 7. Sahansah Manjhi S/O Bhanu Manjhi Resident Of Village- Mishra Bandhawara, P.S.- Bijaypur, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 16-10-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioner on the basis of a forged sale deed dated 21.7.1937 got the mutation done in his name on the land of the informant. It is submitted that on the basis of sale deed mutation Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39384 of 2012 (2) dt.16-10-2012 was done and against the mutation order appeal was filed before the DCLR by the informant which was dismissed when proceeding under section 144 Cr.P.C. was also decided in favour of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that on the basis of information received by the informant under Right to Information Act it was found that there was no sale deed on record as claimed by the petitioner. Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gopalganj in connection with Bijaipur P.S. Case No. 70 of 2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 423

Statute Text:
Section 423 of the Indian Penal Code. Fraudulent execution of deed of transfer containing a false statement of consideration. Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently signs, executes or becomes a party to any deed or instrument which purports to transfer or subject to any charge any property, or any interest therein, and which contains any false statement relating to the consideration for such transfer or charge, or relating to the person or persons for whose use or benefit it is really intended to operate, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.