Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9271 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sudis Ravi Das, S/O Late Mishri Ravidas, R/O Vill-Haraul, P.S.- Noorsarai, Distt-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 29-02-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No.220/2011, G.R. No.2985/2011 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is to have stolen the articles from the house by breaking window. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has given a list of articles, which have been given to the petitioner by the son of the informant. He has also filed a petition before the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda dated 8.12.2011 stating therein that he is ready to return the articles, which has been given by the son of the informant, if the informant receives the articles and grant receipt thereof. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9271 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 2 Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No.220/2011 with the following conditions : 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will appear before the court on each and every date fixed in the case except for any cogent reason. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody forthwith. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 380

Statute Text:
Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft in a building, tent or vessel. Whoever commits theft in any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or used for the custody of property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.