Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5524 of 2012 ====================================================== Satya Naryan Yadav & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-02-2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . Accusation against Halka Karmchari Dayanand Pandit is to have issued forged rent receipts and land possession certificate to confer benefit to non deserving persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have neither received the land possession certificate nor received any gain by virtue of the same and co-accused Dayanand Pandit has been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 4894 of 2010. Considering the same, let the petitioners namely 1. Satya Narayan Yadav 2. Fulo Yadav 3. Sachen Mukhiya 4. Birendra Yadav 5. Ravindra Yadav, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5524 of 2012 (2) dt.27-02-2012 2 / 2 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2009. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.