Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14085 of 2012 (3) dt.27-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14085 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ram Chandra Mahto, Son of Late Prabodhi Mahto 2. Bateshwar Mahto, Son of Sri Nageshwar Mahto, Both Residents of Village and Police Station Vaishali, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gajendra Pd. Yadav, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3. 27.6.2012 Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the petitioners be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 30.11.2011 but with liberty to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. By supplementary affidavit, the order framing charge against all the accused persons is brought on record. In view of such, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14085 of 2012 (3) dt.27-06-2012 amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No.82 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be son/brother/father of the petitioners and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.