Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22562 of 2012 (2) dt.14-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22562 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sk. Janesar @ Sk. Janesar Ahmad S/O Late Sk. Yaseen Resident Of Village- Brindaban, P.S- Sathi, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-06-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] as well as sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is contended that there is no truth behind the allegation made in the complaint. Save and except the ocular evidence, there is no material to support the allegation. The present case has been instituted in order to blackmail the petitioner so that he may agree to marry his son with the daughter of the complainant. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22562 of 2012 (2) dt.14-06-2012 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No.196 (C) of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State/complainant to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.