Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30762 of 2012 (3) dt.25-09-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30762 of 2012 ====================================================== Shambhu Mehta, son of Mahendra Mehta, resident of Village- Madadpur Basa, P.S. Alam Nagar, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3 25-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Alam Nagar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2011 registered under [STATUTE] . The petitioner is said to be apprehended after committing offence under [STATUTE] . while he was fleeing away. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the co-accused having similar allegation has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 23720 of 2012. It is further submitted that custody of the petitioner is more than that of co-accused who has been granted bail. Learned counsel for the State however opposed the prayer for bail and contends that except this case, six cases are pending against this petitioner. However, co-accused who has been granted bail has also three cases in his credit. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30762 of 2012 (3) dt.25-09-2012 the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Avinash Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhepura, in connection with Alam Nagar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2011, subject to condition that one of the bailors shall be near relative of the petitioner and he will an affidavit to this effect that petitioner shall not involve in such activity in future and petitioner shall file Hazri in the nearest police station once in a month for six month. Further condition that petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed in this case. However, if anything is reported against the petitioner then court below shall proceed for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Gopal Prasad, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.