Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11850 of 2012 (2) dt.25-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11850 of 2012 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Matho, son of Ramesh Kumar Matho .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. M. Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2. 25.4.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 4.8.2011 but had been granted the liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that now charges have been framed and, therefore, he should be released on bail on the strength of the earlier liberty. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11850 of 2012 (2) dt.25-04-2012 amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J., F.T.C. 1st, Samastipur in connection with Warisnager P.S. Case No. 58 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date during trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.