Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13997 of 2012 (2) dt.05-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13997 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Dara Paswan S/O Rambriksh Paswan Resident Of Village- Barhi Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti (Chakand), District- Gaya 2. Dinesh Das S/O late Kailash Das Resident Of Village- Barhi Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti (Chakand), District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] and section 27 of the Arms. It is stated that a general and omnibus allegation has been made against fifteen named accused persons including the petitioners. There is land dispute. Though the allegation is that they were armed with fire arm, the same was not used. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Sudama Paswan, Ramashray Paswan, Arun Das, Ganesh Das, Awadhesh Das and Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar have already been granted anticipatory bail by order dated 16.3.2012 passed in Cr.Misc. No.38687 of 2011 by another of this court. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioners named above are directed Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13997 of 2012 (2) dt.05-04-2012 to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti (Chakand) P.S. Case No.136 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they shall immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 148

Statute Text:
Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code. Rioting armed with deadly Weapon. Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.