Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25991 of 2012 (3) dt.14-08-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 25991 of 2012 ====================================================== Amar Nath Paswan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3 14-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case under [STATUTE] . There is allegation that the petitioner was identified by the informant at the time of occurrence. However, there was observation that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charge. However, the criminal antecedent of the petitioner says that the petitioner is accused in one another case under [STATUTE] . Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. However, if the trial is not concluded within six months or after evidence of the informant, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. Kundan/- (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.