Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25003 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Shyam Gope S/O Kashan Gope Resident Of Village- Olibigha, P.S- Chandi, District- Nalanda .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3 27-08-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner has not been named in the first information report and remanded in this case. On the confessional statement of the petitioner earrings were recovered from Ma Durga Temple, which was identified. It has also been mentioned that some articles have also been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the articles recovered from the possession have not been identified and the earrings which have been identified have not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and it is stated that some articles have been recovered on the confessional statement before the police, which is not acceptable. The petitioner is in jail since 01.03.2012. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 332 of 2011 to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall appear in Court on each and every date, fixed in the case and any absence, on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable ground to the satisfaction of the Court below, shall be a ground of cancellation of bail of the petitioner by the lower Court itself, one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, who will affidavit to the effect that the petitioner shall not indulge in such activity further and if he indulges, then, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25003 of 2012 (3) dt.27-08-2012 2/2 the deponent must inform the Court about the indulgence of the petitioner and the Court below, itself, shall, proceed to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. SA/- (Gopal Prasad, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 394

Statute Text:
Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing or attempting to commit robbery, or any other person jointly concerned in such robbery. If any person, in committing or in attempting to commit robbery, voluntarily causes hurt, such person, and any other person jointly concerned in committing or attempting to commit such robbery, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.