Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3422 of 2012 ====================================================== Anil Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioner took Rupees three lacs fifty thousand cash for providing job to the son of the informant in the railway and subsequently, issued a cheque of rupees twenty five thousand which got bounced. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that representation given in the Janta Darbar of the Chief Minister, as contained in Annexure 4, reflects a different story and the documents annexed with that reflect the payment to different persons as Kalpana Samanta, Arup Banerjee and others though the same reflects that rupees six thousand was paid to the petitioner also. Considering the fact that the payments are alleged to Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3422 of 2012 (2) dt.03-02-2012 2 / 2 2 have been made in cash and the fact that the other accused person, namely, Rakesh Kumar Tufan has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order as contained in Annexure 5, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 144 /2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted on deposit of thirty one thousand rupees which will be invested in some fixed deposit schemes in connection with the present case which will be subject to the result of the case. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 467

Statute Text:
Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery of a valuable security, will or authority to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive any money, etc. Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security or a will, or an authority to adopt a son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive the principal, interest or dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any money, movable property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be an acquittance or receipt acknowledging the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the delivery of any movable property or valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.