Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17587 of 2012 (2) dt.26-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17587 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Mukesh Kumar S/O Dukhi Prasad Mandal Resident Of Village- Kharagdiha, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 26-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case in which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is stated that there is no truth behind the allegation of subjecting the complainant to cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. The marriage in question took place in the year 2003. Though there is allegation in the complaint that prior to 8.7.2005 she was driven out of her matrimonial home but neither she nor her parents had lodged any compliant before any authority. Further contention is that the case has been filed out of matrimonial discord and incompatibility between the parties. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17587 of 2012 (2) dt.26-04-2012 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Complaint Case No.983C of 2008 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the complainant/State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 406

Statute Text:
Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Criminal breach of trust. Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.