Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36687 of 2012 (2) dt.19-09-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36687 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Azam, S/o late Ziyabul Mistri .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 19.09.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2011 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha) P.S. Case No. 115 of 2009. 3. The allegation is with regard to snatching of motorcycle, cash etc. by 3 or 4 unknown criminals from the informant who was returning on the motorcycle along with Bhawani Shankar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is neither named in the First Information Report nor was he arrested on the spot or even have any witnesses identified him at the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that none of the stolen articles have been recovered from him rather the motorcycle in question was recovered from the co-accused Tabrej Alam based on the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36687 of 2012 (2) dt.19-09-2012 confessional statement of Deo Narayan @ Deo Mandal. 5. Considering that no recovery has been made from the petitioner and also he has remanded in the present case on 28.01.2011, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria, in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha) P.S. Case No. 115 of 2009 (G.R. No. 645 of 2009) on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.