Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11198 of 2012 (2) dt.04-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11198 of 2012 ====================================================== Vikrant Kishore .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a protest- cum-complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . It is alleged against the petitioner and another that theft was committed in the shop of the informant. It is submitted that during investigation the accusation was found false and final form was submitted but much after submission of the final form protest was filed and on protest cognizance has been taken. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Amit Raj, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11198 of 2012 (2) dt.04-04-2012 Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in protest-cum-Complaint Case No.1877(C) of 2011 arising out of Pirbahore P.S.case No.48 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.