Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44513 of 2012 (2) dt.13-12-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44513 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramesh Yadav, son of Shri Upendra Yadav, resident of village-Amha, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 13-12-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Supaul P.S. Case No.438/2012 registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown. During investigation, the petitioner confessed his guilt and thereafter, the stolen pump set has been recovered from the possession of the co-accused. No T.I.P has been made. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 19.08.2012. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Supaul P.S. Case No.438 of 2012 with the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44513 of 2012 (2) dt.13-12-2012 2 following conditions: 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.