Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10274 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Birendra Chaudhary S/O Late Ram Swarup Chaudhary R/O Vill- Rupaspur, P.S.Buniyadganj, Distt-Gaya 2. Guddu Chaudhary S/O Late Ram Swrup Chaudhary R/O Vill-Rupaspur, P.S.Buniyadganj, Distt-Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.12140 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Manoj Choudhary @ Manoj Kumar S/O Buta Choudhary R/O Village - Shekhabigha, P.O. Alipur, P.S. Buniyadganj, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.10274 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Cr.Misc. No.12140 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10274 of 2012 (2) dt.02-04-2012 2 / 3 2 registered for offence punishable under [STATUTE] and section 47(A) of the Excise Act. From petitioner no.1 Birendra Chaudhary and petitioner no.2 Guddu Chaudhary of Cr. Misc case no.10274 of 2012, 22 litres and 24 litres of country made liquor respectively were recovered and seized. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that recovery was made from the embankment of river and this recovery does not suggest involvement of the petitioners as no structure was there. In similar matter other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. From the petitioner Manoj Chaudhary of Cr. Misc. no.12140 of 2012, 13 litres of country made liquor was recovered. Recovery is made from the open field. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Considering the quantity of recovery and nature of recovery, let petitioners named above of the both the petitions be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender in the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. case no.8 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10274 of 2012 (2) dt.02-04-2012 3 / 3 3 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. sudip/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 271

Statute Text:
Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code. Knowingly disobeying any quarantine rule. Whoever knowingly disobeys any rule made and promulgated by the Government for putting any vessel into a state of quarantine, or for regulating the intercourse of vessels in a state of quarantine with the shore or with other vessels, for regulating the intercourse between places where an infectious disease prevails and other places, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.