Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15893 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Nizam @ Nizam & Ors. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-05-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The specific accusation of assault is against Md. Guddu and Md. Suddu. Though there is accusation of snatching wrist watch and gold chain is against Md. Nizam and Md. Jabbar respectively. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for occurrence of 24.05.2011, F.I.R. was lodged on 03.08.2011. Considering delayed lodging of F.I.R. which clouds the bonafide of accusation, let the petitioners, Md. Nizam @ Nizam, Md. Dua, Md. Guddu, Md. Suddu, Md. Pinka @ Pinka, Md. Jabbar and Md. Nazim, be released on bail in the event of arrest or Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15893 of 2012 (2) dt.01-05-2012 2 / 2 2 surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 135 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.