Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.586 of 2012 ====================================================== Himansu Kumar Singh S/O Krishna Pratap Singh Resident Of Village Dullahpur, P.S. Simri, District Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-05-2012 The petitioner is admittedly found to be a juvenile by the juvenile justice Board. He is in custody since 21.12.2012 in Buxar (T) Police Station Case No. 48 of 2012 [STATUTE] wo others were trying to withdraw money by putting forged signature of other person on the withdrawal form. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no money was withdrawn by the petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner as mentioned above be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the juvenile Justice Board, Buxar in Criminal Appeal no.22 of 2012, arising out of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.586 of 2012 (2) dt.21-05-2012 2 / 2 2 Buxar(T) Police Station Case No. 48 of 2012 with condition that his father would also accompany his son to the court at least upto six months or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.