Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27476 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27476 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar S/o Ram Swaroop Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 18.07.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 5.2.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 38 of 2012. 3. According to the prosecution story the petitioner was standing with co-accused Sunil Kumar and on question Sunil Kumar gave details that the motor cycle in question had been stolen with Brajesh Kumar from Gayatri Hotel Kachari Road Nawadah. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the recovery of the motor cycle has been made from co-accused Sunil Kumar as evident from the First Information Report itself whereas only a mobile phone has been recovered from his possession. Apart from the fact that he happened to be standing with Sunil Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27476 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 Kumar there is no allegation whatsoever with regard to the theft as concerns the petitioner. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and the fact that the recovery of the motor cycle has been made on Sunil Kumar, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 38 of 2012 on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 413

Statute Text:
Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code. Habitually dealing in stolen property. Whoever habitually receives or deals in property which he knows or has reason to believe to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.