Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20310 of 2012 ====================================================== Manish Yadav & Anr .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 18-07-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is that with regard to land of the informant, one Dharmendra Kumar executed power of attorney in favour of petitioner no. 2 Binay Yadav claiming himself to be the owner when Binay Yadav executed sale deed in favour of petitioner no.1 Manish Yadav on which Nikhil Pratap Singh and Basisth Nath Singh are witnesses. It is submitted that Dharmendra Kumar has already been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against Dharmendra Kumar, let the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20310 of 2012 (3) dt.18-07-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioners, Manish Yadav and Binay Yadav be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 82 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.