Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44002 of 2012 ====================================================== Kazi Shakil Ahmad @ Quazi Shakil Ahmad, son of Late Kazi Abdul Hassan, resident of Union Cooperative Campus, Near Rimjhim Hotel, Patna Road, P.S.- Dehri-On-Sone, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 11-12-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Trial No.1622/2011 arising out of Complaint Case No.885/2011 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even according to the complaint petition Suraiya Tarannum was adopted by Kazi Israt Hussain as his daughter and after adoption, the petitioner is not liable for any act of Suraiya Tarannum. There is no document to show that the petitioner has borrowed the money. Moreover, no criminal case is made out and at best it is a case of civil liability. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He has been in custody since 17.09.2012. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44002 of 2012 (2) dt.11-12-2012 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Anindita Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Cass, Gaya in Complaint Case No.885/2011 (Trial No.1622/2011) with the following conditions: 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.