Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1095 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh. 2. Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh. 3. Ganeshwar Prasad Singh @ Ganesh Prasad Singh @ Ganesh Prasad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 13-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that petitioner no.1, Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh used to deal the stolen cars and the complainant purchased the vehicle for consideration money of Rs. 4,60,000/- for which Rs. 4,00,000/- were paid but rest Rs. 60,000/- was to paid after handing over of the original documents of the vehicle but the same was never handed over to the complainant. Subsequently the complainant came to know that vehicle was stolen he handed over the vehicle to the police station. Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against petitioner no.1, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh, let the learned court 2 below consider the regular bail application of petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh keeping in view that the cognizance has been taken in the complaint case and for the alleged offence a separate police case was lodged in which Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh has been granted bail. Considering the fact that petitioner nos. 2 and 3 being the brother and father of petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh having no specific accusation, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 463 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anjani /- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.