Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.579 of 2012 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar @ Sachendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 11-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] and subsequently [STATUTE] has been added. The informant’s bolero vehicle was stolen away by the accused persons. It is alleged against the petitioner being the driver that he was driving that vehicle. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the confession of the co-accused it is apparent that the petitioner did not participate in committing the vehicle in question and for the same offence another case was also lodged against the petitioner in which the petitioner was granted bail and apart from these two cases, the petitioner has not involved in any other case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No. 262 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.