Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.454 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.454 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sunil Singh S/O Rajesh Singh R/V- Chhatar, P.S.- Cholapur, District- Varanasi (U.P.) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 02. 01.02.2012 Supplementary-affidavit filed today be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 14.09.2011. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that there is no progress in trial as also that co-accused similarly placed have been granted bail by this Court. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 30.05.2011 but apart from one other connected case there is no case pending against him, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 59 of 2011 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the petitioner belongs to U.P. and the other bailor shall be the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.454 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 2 father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Court below is directed to consider amalgamation of present case with Kudra P.S. Case No. 99/11. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.