Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3278 of 2012 ====================================================== Badan Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 2 01-02-2012 Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences under [STATUTE] . Accusation against the petitioner is that he got his selection as Anganbari Sevika in 2009 on the basis of forged educational certificate. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though petitioner was appointed on the basis of forged educational certificate but his appointment was cancelled and two years thereafter the present case has been lodged. It is further submitted that petitioner has not received any payment. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Badan Devi, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3278 of 2012 (2) dt.01-02-2012 2 / 2 2 today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Nawhatta P.S.Case No. 86 of 2011. If it is found that petitioner has received any payment, then he will be liable to return the same with statutory interest. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.