Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44215 of 2012 (2) dt.05-11-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44215 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Santosh Kumar 2. Shankar Kumar 3. Barun Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2 05-11-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case under [STATUTE] . There is allegation that the petitioners were engaged in cheating in the name of providing job on the basis of forgery after taking money. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not the owner of the firm and they were working in the firm on the monthly basis for their livelihood. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P. S. Case No. 308 of 2012, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall appear in the case on each and every date fixed by the learned court below. Kundan/- (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.