Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9873 of 2012 (2) dt.14-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9873 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sudhil Singh@Sudhir Singh S/O Suraj Singh Resident Of Village- Jimichauk, P.S- Pakari, District- Balia (U.P) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.N. Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 14-03-2012 This is repeat application seeking bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including [STATUTE] . Petitioner’s earlier bail application was considered and rejected with observation by order dated 16.3.2011 (Annexure-1), a perusal whereof indicates that this Court directed for his release from jail custody in the event the prosecution failed to examine all the prosecution witnesses within the stipulated time. From the impugned order, it appears that all the prosecution witnesses were examined inasmuch as the evidence for prosecution was closed within the time. This Court, therefore, finds no merit in the application. It is accordingly dismissed. Pankaj/- (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.