Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29096 of 2012 (3) dt.20-09-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29096 of 2012 ========================================= Bairagi Yadav, son of Late Baiju Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ========================================= With Criminal Miscellaneous No.29175 of 2012 ========================================== Ajnasiya Devi, wife of Late Bhuneshwar Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ========================================= With Criminal Miscellaneous No.32250 of 2012 ========================================= Raj Kumar Yadav, son of Shri Moti Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ========================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 20-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. These three applications have been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners who have been made an accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and added [STATUTE] . In this case instituted against one Badri Ram, driver of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29096 of 2012 (3) dt.20-09-2012 the Auto Rickshaw owned by the informant. Petitioners’ name emerged during investigation, initially on the basis of conversation through cellular phone of solitary named accused who later on was found dead. Name of petitioner Bairagi Yadav emerged and on the basis of his extra judicial confession regarding some sort of conspiracy against the deceased. Name of other miscreants emerged and on the basis of extra judicial confession of other names of two petitioners also emerged, but none of these three petitioners appears claimed any active role or having knowledge of the mischief and occurrence except petitioner Raj Kumar Yadav who also though dismantled Auto Rickshaw at the dictates, but there appears nothing to show that he did so having knowledge of wrong, and none of these three petitioners carry any criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Lakhisarai (Kawaiya) P.S. Case No. 121 of 2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.