Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4767 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4767 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Raj Nandan Rai @ Rajnan S/O Sri Naaib Rai Resident Of Village- Naya Panapur (New Dieri), Police Station- Akilpur, Presently Residing At Mohalla- Ramjeechak, Police Station- Digha, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 29.02.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under [STATUTE] and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 19.10.2011 but had been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge since the injury was simple in nature. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that now charges have been framed for which a supplementary- affidavit is also kept on record. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-V, Danapur at Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 23/12 arising out of Akilpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4767 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In case, there is any complaint against the petitioner of intimidating the witnesses immediate steps shall be taken for cancellation of his bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.