Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16302 of 2012 ====================================================== Navin Sah, S/o Suresh Sah, R/o village-Rahim Pur, P.S.-Khagaria Mufassil, District-Khagaria .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under [STATUTE] . It is stated that the case was registered against unknown accused persons. In course of investigation a mobile set is said to have been recovered from his possession. The contention is that he had purchased the said mobile set from one Sonu Kumar who runs a shop in the name and style of Baba Communication. The owner of the shop Sonu Kumar was, subsequently, arrested and has been granted bail by the court below. It is also submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he has become a victim of circumstances. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16302 of 2012 (2) dt.20-04-2012 2 / 2 2 bail on his executing a bond with two solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 107 of 2011 subject to verification regarding his antecedent by the court below, if, it is found that he is accused in any other case, the court below will not give effect to the order granting bail to the petitioner by this court as also on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he will immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.