Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18434 of 2012 ====================================================== Rinkoo Singh @ Rikesh Singh, Son of Ngina Singh. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 15-05-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is languishing in custody, seeks bail in a case registered under [STATUTE] . In this case, instituted against unknown, petitioner’s name emerged during investigation on getting location of one of the looted article, a cellular phone, which is recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he also has been identified in test identification parade by the informant and another. Further, petitioner has also some criminal antecedent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, for the present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the above named petitioner, in connection with Shahkund P.S. Case No. 165/2011, G.R. No. 2542/2011, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur is hereby, refused. Simultaneously, the courts below are directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial and avoid undue delay and adjournments. Praveen-II/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.