Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12261 of 2012 ====================================================== Deepak Sharma, son of Suresh Sharma @ Suresh Mistri, resident of Prabhat Chowk, Mansoorchak, P.S.-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is contended that the petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor anything incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He has been remanded to judicial custody on 20.1.2012 and since then, he is in jail. Till date, he has not been put on T.I. Parade. He has been apprehended on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Lalan Yadav, who in his confessional statement, apart from the name of the petitioner took name of Bikash Yadav and Shambhu Singh @ Bhuta. Both Bikash Yadav and Shambhu Singh @ Bhuta whose case is identical to that of the petitioner have already been granted bail by order dated 14.3.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11157 of 2012 by another bench of this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond with two Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12261 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 2 / 2 2 solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 177 of 2011 on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he will take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he will immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Sanjeet/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 394

Statute Text:
Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing or attempting to commit robbery, or any other person jointly concerned in such robbery. If any person, in committing or in attempting to commit robbery, voluntarily causes hurt, such person, and any other person jointly concerned in committing or attempting to commit such robbery, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.