Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36515 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Saat Ansari @ Saat Ansari @ Md. Sad Ansari @ Hussian .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that the petitioner realized Rs. 1,00,000/- for sale of a bus standing in the garage and executed a receipt on non judicial stamp paper but neither the bus was transferred nor money was returned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per own admission of the complainant the receipt was being snatched prior to lodging of the present case hence there is no proof with regard to payment made to the petitioner. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36515 of 2012 (2) dt.25-09-2012 2 / 2 2 the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 2345 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.