Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.75 of 2012 ====================================================== Kamala Sharma .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 06-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The son of the petitioner went missing on 11.11.2000. A report was made to the police in this regard pursuant to which Agiaon Bazar P.S.Case no.59 of 2000 was instituted under [STATUTE] . The police took up the investigation. The petitioner being not satisfied with the manner in which the investigation was being conducted, filed a protest petition in the court. Ultimately, on conclusion of investigation, the police submitted a final report holding the prosecution case to be false. The Magistrate accepted the final report and directed to register a regular complaint on the basis of protest petition which was already on record. After examining the complainant on solemn affirmation and conducting enquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of Patna High Court CR. WJC No.75 of 2012 (3) dt.06-09-2012 2 the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order by which the complaint petition was dismissed, preferred a revision before the learned Sessions Judge, Ara vide Cr.Revision No.29 of 2011. The learned Sessions Judge, Ara after hearing the parties dismissed the revision petition preferred on behalf of the petitioner by his order dated 21.06.2011. The petitioner has challenged the aforesaid order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ara in the present writ petition. I have heard the parties and perused the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ara, I find no illegality in the order. The writ petition lacks merit. It is dismissed, accordingly. B.Kr./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 366

Statute Text:
Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. Kidnapping or abducting a woman to compel her marriage or to cause her defilement etc. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any woman with intent that she may be compelled, or knowing it to be likely that she will be compelled, to marry any person against her will, or in order that she may be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse, or knowing it to be likely that she will be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and whoever, by means of criminal intimidation as defined in this Code or of abuse of authority or any other method of compulsion, induces any woman to go from any place with intent that she may be, or knowing that it is likely that she will be, forced or seduced to illicit intercourse with another person shall also be punishable as aforesaid.