Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18910 of 2012 ====================================================== Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 28-06-2012 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] and 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to seek regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below without being prejudiced by the order of this Court keeping in view of the fact that the person, from whose possession recovery has been made, has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 20524 of 2012, I see no reason for learned court below not to give same privilege to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case No. 75 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18910 of 2012 (2) dt.28-06-2012 2/2 of 2011 pending in the court of learned Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar. With the aforesaid observation, this application is permitted to be withdrawn. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) . .

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.