Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37875 of 2011 ====================================================== Dr. Ram Krishna Prasad Singh @ Dr. R.K.P. Singh @ Dr. R.K.P. Sinha, S/O Late Purendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Parmanand Path, Nageshwar Colony, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar through Vigilance Department, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 6 30-10-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 15.9.2011 passed in Special Case No.41 of 2009, arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.49 of 2009 by the learned Special Judge, Vigilance-I, Patna by which he has taken cognizance against the petitioner under [STATUTE] and Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37875 of 2011 (6) dt.30-10-2012 2 a liberty to raise all points before the court below at the appropriate stage. Permission is accorded. Accordingly this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.