Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46096 of 2012 ====================================================== Bambam Mandal @ Pocha @ Pochu S/o Jaihendra Mandal, R/o village- Paria Bariarpur, P.S. Bariarpur, District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bibhuti Pd. Singh, Advocate For the State of Bihar : Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. In a criminal prosecution registered for the offences under [STATUTE] . as also section 27 of the Arms Act, the petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since 14.7.2011. It is submitted by the learned counsel that, in fact, the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot rather his name was disclosed by other co-accused persons, who were apprehended by the police. Taking into consideration the period of incarceration the prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioner, Bambam Mandal @ Pocha @ Pochu is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with G.R.P. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46096 of 2012 (2) dt.17-12-2012 2/2 Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2011 to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul, Lakhisarai subject to the conditions that: (a) One of the bailors must be a government servant or close family member or relation of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his relationship with the petitioner. (b) If the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. (c ) The petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. RPS/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.