Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29748 of 2012 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Dubey .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in Complaint Case No. 672C of 2005 in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara. The accusation is of purchasing the property of the complainant through the co-sharer of the complainant who are accused no. 3 to 9 in the FIR. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is bona fide purchaser. In view of this Court, it is fit case for consideration of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks. With the above observation, this application is, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29748 of 2012 (2) dt.17-08-2012 2/2 accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.