Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1702 of 2011 ====================================================== Umesh Prasad Rai, S/o Sri Munak Lal Rai, Resident of Village Godhiyari, P.S. – Tajpur, District – Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Lakhindra Rai, S/o Late Godhiyari, P.S. – Tajpur, District – Samastipur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 4 02-02-2012 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shyam Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Sri Ajey Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2. The petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order, which was passed long back on 27.09.2007, wherein, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, had taken cognizance of offence under [STATUTE] in T.R. No. 638 of 2011 / T.R. No. 430 of 2011, arising out of Tajpur Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1702 of 2011 (4) dt.02-02-2012 2 / 2 2 P.S. Case No. 286 of 2006. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2 submits, that after order of cognizance stage of the case has already been changed and charges have already been framed. In view of the fact that charges have already been framed in the case, there is no ground for interference with the order of cognizance. The petition stands dismissed. Praful/- (Rakesh Kumar, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 465

Statute Text:
Section 465 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery. Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.