Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12194 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12194 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Ranjan S/O Binod Prasad R/O Vill-Daruara, P.S.Noorsarai, Distt-Nalanda, At Present Qr.No.179, New Type-2, Central Revenue Colony, Ashiyana Digha Road, Distt-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is contended that the petitioner is neither named in the first information report nor anything specific has come against him in course of investigation. Co-accused persons namely, Nitish Kumar, Chandan Kumar and Om Prakash Suman @ Panna Lal Pandey have already been granted bail by different orders passed by this court. The case of the petitioner stands on identical footing to that of other co-accused, who have already been granted bail. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12194 of 2012 (2) dt.21-03-2012 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No.157 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 365

Statute Text:
Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine a person. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person with intent to cause that person to be secretly and wrongfully confined, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.