Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6430 of 2012 (2) dt.10-02-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6430 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Urmila Devi D/O Late Parsuram Mahto R/O Vill.- Gosai Tola Pakri, P.S.- Turpatti, Dist.- Kushinagar (U.P.) .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.61/2011 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . The allegation is that after drinking water given by the petitioner, her husband (informant) started vomiting. It is submitted that the petitioner is the wife of the informant. She has filed a complaint case no.2269/2005 in the court of learned C.J.M, Gopalganj for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . and she has been living with her mother in the district Kushinagar (U.P.) and has been falsely implicated in this case with a view to pressurize the petitioner to compromise the case, which is pending in the court at Gopalganj. The petitioner has been in custody since 30.11.2011. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6430 of 2012 (2) dt.10-02-2012 2 contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.61/2011 with the following conditions : 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will appear before the court on each and every date fixed in the case except for any cogent reason. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of the terms of the bail, her bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and she will be taken into custody forthwith. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 307

Statute Text:
Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Attempt to murder. Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either to imprisonment for life, or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned. Attempts by Life Convicts: When any person offending under this section is under sentence of imprisonment for life, he may, if hurt is caused, be punished with death.