Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26494 of 2011 ====================================================== Satish Jee @ Chhotu Das @ Navin Jee, son of Deolal Das, resident of Village-Mahangupur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 4 15-03-2012 Heard the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Barachatti Mohanpur P.S. Case No.156 of 2007 for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] , sections 3/5 of the Explosive Substance Act and section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations set out in the FIR are .omnibus and general in nature against 14 accused named in the FIR. He further with reference to the order dated 21.05.2009 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.13424 of 2009 submits that a Bench of this Court considering the circumstances has been pleased to pass order for release of nine accused persons on bail, namely, Suraj Yadav, Jaglal Yadav @ Butali Yadav, Anchhu Yadav, Narayan Yadav, Puna Yadav, Deochand Yadav, Lakhan Sao, Kuleshwar Manjhi @ Kuleshwar Bhuiyan and Rupan Yadav. He thus submits that the case of the present petitioner stands on same and similar footing and although he has been in custody for more than three years but in the present case he has been remanded on Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26494 of 2011 (4) dt.15-03-2012 2 30.01.2010. A report was called for form the court below and the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya has informed that the case is committed to the court of Sessions for trial. Considering the circumstances and the submission of learned counsel, let the petitioner, namely, Satish Jee @ Chhotu Das @ Navin Jee be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti Mohanpur P.S. Case No.156 of 2007; subject to the condition that the petitioner shall ensure his representation before the court below on each and every date fixed in the trial and failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed in the trial, without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial court, would entitle the court concerned to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and to take him/them into custody. SKPathak/- (Jyoti Saran, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 323

Statute Text:
Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Voluntarily causing hurt. Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.