Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47714 of 2012 (2) dt.19-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47714 of 2012 ====================================================== Rambaran Sah S/o Sulen Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 19-12-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] . registered in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2012. 3. The allegation relates to snatching motor cycle of the informant by three persons of whom Manish Kumar and Vikram Jha and he has stated the name of the petitioner, the later two have been escaped. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case stands on better footing that the co-accused Manish Kumar, who was arrested on the spot has already been granted bail on 07.06.2012 in Cr. Misc. No. 21019 of 2012. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a labour in the Rojgar Guarantee Yojna and except the present case and another arm case arising out of same transaction he has no Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47714 of 2012 (2) dt.19-12-2012 criminal antecedents. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2012 on the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) One of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. AnilKrSinha/- (Vikash Jain, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 411

Statute Text:
Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.