Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16101 of 2012 ====================================================== Kajesh Kurail@Kulesh Kurail .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-05-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of withdrawing money of real beneficiary by pasting the photograph of other people under Indira Awas Scheme. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. and he was only identifier of photograph when F.I.R. named accused Gaya Devi has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 1232 of 2012. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16101 of 2012 (2) dt.03-05-2012 2 / 2 2 court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 2935 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.