Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1186 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Lakshmi Sah 2. Arjun Sah 3. Vikas Kumar. 4. Balram Sah. 5. Madan Sah. …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar …. …. Opposite Party/s 2 16-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of fabricating deed of agreement to sale a land. It appears that the title suit is pending between the parties and the petitioners’ side also lodged a complaint against the complainant. Considering the accusation arising out of civil nature of dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 192 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.