Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37313 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Shyam Kumar Nirala 2. Ramuchit Paswan. 3. Bhanu Yadav. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-10-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . It is alleged that Rakesh Kumar being the brother of the complainant sold the share of the complainant in favour of the petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the bonafide purchasers. Considering the nature of accusation arising out of share dispute between the vendor of the petitioners and the complainant, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37313 of 2012 (2) dt.01-10-2012 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 12(c) of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.