Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22327 of 2012 (2) dt.14-06-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22327 of 2012 ====================================================== Kalu Miyan @ Md. Samim Ansari @ Samim Ansari son of late md. Najam Ansari R/O village-Hariharganj, P.S.Hariharganj, District-Palamu (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2. 14-06-2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 8.5.2012 in connection with alleged offences under [STATUTE] registered in connection with Amba P.S.Case No.29 of 2011. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that even on the allegation made in the F.I.R. it is clear that the petitioner has been implicated on mere suspicion as there is no eye witness to the occurrence of theft of ox. Moreover, it is stated that the godown from which the ox was said to be recovered, has wrongly been stated to be the godown of the petitioner rather it belongs to Zuber Alam which is evident from the lease document contained in Annexure-2 by which Zuber Alam has leased out the said godown in favour of Md. Mohasan. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22327 of 2012 (2) dt.14-06-2012 Considering the above facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Amba P.S.Case No.29 of 2011 on the following conditions: That the petitioner will not indulge himself in any similar or other offence. (ii) That one of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. ahk/- (Vikash Jain, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.