Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13950 of 2012 (2) dt.25-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13950 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Bhuar Ansari @ Bahauddin Ansari, son of Rehanuddin Ansari. 2. Jitendra Kumar Sah @ Jitendra Kumar Gupta, son of Jhaman Lal Sah @ Jhaman Lal Gupta. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 25-04-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. This application has been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners who are in custody since 21.02.2012 has been made an accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . Both the petitioners are named accused in this case on being apprehended from the Bank while making an attempt to escape and on their identification another co-accused was apprehended from queue of the persons who initially avoided to disclose his proper identity but all failed to withdraw the money from the account of the third person. Submission is of false Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13950 of 2012 (2) dt.25-04-2012 implication without any material and whatever allegation is making against non petitioner who was apprehended from the queue of the persons at the withdrawal window of the Bank. Further, petitioners have no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 48/2012, with a condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.