Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30809 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30809 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar Yadav S/O Chedi Prasad Yadav R/O Vill. Maugama, P.S. Shankarpur, Distt. Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suresh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 03. 19.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under [STATUTE] . Considering that the case is of the year 2002 and cognizance was taken in the matter in the year 2009 whereas the present application has been filed only in the year 2011, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 471

Statute Text:
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Using as genuine a forged document which is known to be forged. Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document.