Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40962 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Nayeem, son of late Hussain @ Buchai, resident of Village Pipra Bazar, P.S. Pipra, Dist. Supaul. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the fact that the name of the petitioner in relation to the offence under [STATUTE] . has transpired on the confession statement of the co-accused and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, this Court, having regard to the recovery of coins worth Rs. 353/- from Sunil Yadav, who had only stated about the involvement of the petitioner, would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Md. Nayeem on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 143 of 2012, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by a Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for two consecutive Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40962 of 2012 (2) dt.09-10-2012 2 days would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Rishi/- (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.