Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6230 of 2012 (2) dt.16-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6230 of 2012 ====================================================== Binod Yadav & Anr. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.6800 of 2012 ====================================================== Punit Chaudhary@Punit .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 16.02.2012 Both the above stated petitions have arisen out of Chutia P.S. Case no. 10/2011 registered under [STATUTE] , 27 of the Arms Act, 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substance Act, 17 CLA Act and, accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed off by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners in Cr. Misc. no. 6230/2012 submits that three petitions were filed in the concerned police station in respect of the alleged occurrence but only one petition contains names of these petitioners and, as a matter of fact, petitioners have been roped in this case on account of political rivalry and having considered the aforesaid fact, one co-accused namely, Dhananjay Singh @ Tutu Singh has already been granted privilege of bail vide order dated 30.1.2012 passed in cr. Misc. no. 43857/2011. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6230 of 2012 (2) dt.16-02-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 6800/2012 echoed the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners in Cr. Misc. no. 6230/2012. Considering the above stated submissions as well as this aspect of the matter that no specific overt-act has been attributed against these petitioners and having more or less similar allegation one co-accused namely, Dhananjay Singh @ Tutu Singh has already been granted privilege of bail, let, petitioners, Binod Yadav, Pintu Yadav and Punit Chaudhary @ Punit be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Chutia P.S. Case no. 10/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Applicable IPC Section: 436

Statute Text:
Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code. Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house etc. Whoever commits mischief by fire or any explosive substance, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause the destruction of any building which is ordinarily used as a place of worship or as a human dwelling or as a place for the custody of property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.