Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38840 of 2011 (3) dt.22-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38840 of 2011 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Son of Birendra Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. M. Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.S. Pahepuri, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3. 22.2.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner was refused bail on two occasions earlier since a sum of Rs.2 lacs was recovered from his house consequent to the confessional statement of the co-accused. A report was called for from the Trial Court, from which it appears that still four more witnesses are left to be examined. The specific assertion is that the petitioner has fair antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38840 of 2011 (3) dt.22-02-2012 F.T.C. Vth, Khagaria in connection with S.C. No.93 of 2010 arising out of Parbatta P.S. Case No.107 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date during trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Applicable IPC Section: 412

Statute Text:
Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Dishonestly receiving stolen property, knowing that it was obtained by Dacoity. Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, the possession whereof he knows or has reason to believe to have been transferred by the commission of dacoity, or dishonestly receives from a person, whom he knows or has reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits, property which he knows or has reason to believe to have been stolen, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.