Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37422 of 2012 ====================================================== Himanshu Kumar Chaturvedi @ Bablu Chaturvedi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-11-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State Mr. J.N.Thakur. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The vehicle of the informant was taken away by Raju Patel, Raju Kumar, Mahesh Mahto and Sonu Kumar. The name of the petitioner subsequently surfaced on confession of one Sintu Kumar. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that except confession of Sintu Kumar there is nothing against the petitioner. In view of this Court, it is a fit case for consideration of regular bail, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of eight weeks in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37422 of 2012 (2) dt.07-11-2012 2 / 2 2 375 of 2011, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. With the observations above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.