Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31118 of 2012 ====================================================== Bimlesh Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus C.B.I. Bihar, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.35119 of 2012 ====================================================== Prem Chand Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union Of India Through C.B.I .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.40035 of 2012 ====================================================== Rama Nand Kumar @ Ram Nandan Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar Through C.B.I. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 09-11-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, C.B.I. and the State. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31118 of 2012 (5) dt.09-11-2012 2 / 3 2 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . and Sections 7,8,10,12,32(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. It is alleged against petitioner Bimlesh Kumar and Rama Nand Kumar that they got themselves recruited in C.R.P.C. on the post of Constable on the basis of forged sports certificate, whereas it is alleged against petitioner Prem Chand Kumar that he contacted the kingpin Mukesh Kumar when Mukesh Kumar demanded Rs. 2,00,000/- from each candidate for which Rs. 5 to 6 lacs were paid to Mukesh Kumar when three candidates succeeded in getting appointment. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no proof with regard to the actual payment when it is submitted on behalf of Bimlesh Kumar and Rama Nand Kumar that they did not join on the basis of alleged certificate. It is submitted by learned counsel for the C.B.I. that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted. In that view of the matter, let learned Court below consider regular bail of the petitioners, if the petitioners surrender within a period of eight weeks in connection with Special Case No. 04 of 2009, arising out of R.C. Case No. 01 of 2009, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, C.B.I., Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31118 of 2012 (5) dt.09-11-2012 3 / 3 3 Court No. III, Patna. With the observations above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioners. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 466

Statute Text:
Section 466 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery of a record of a court of Justice or of a Registrar of Births, etc., kept by a public servant. Whoever forges a document, purporting to be a record or proceeding of or in a Court of Justice, or a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a register kept by a public servant as such, or a certificate or document purporting to be made by a public servant in his official capacity, or an authority to institute or defend a suit, or to take any proceedings therein, or to confess judgment, or a power of attorney, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.