Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4123 of 2012 ====================================================== Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.09.2010 in connection with Rail P.S. Kiul Case No. 13 of 2010 registered under [STATUTE] pending in the court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai. The accusation is of committing dacoity in the train. From the possession of the petitioner robbed mobile was recovered. Though, in 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the father of the petitioner stated that the petitioner used to commit dacoity in the train but during trial he has not supported the accusation. Considering the fact that the trial is going on, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4123 of 2012 (2) dt.13-02-2012 2 / 2 2 petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for pail if the trial is not completed within a period of nine months. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.