Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10659 of 2012 (2) dt.07-03-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10659 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Nurain Mian, S/O Late Aziz Mian, R/O Village - Bhojpurwa, P.S. Manjhagarh, District – Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 07-03-2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Anita Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Gopalganj P.S. Case no.376 of 2010 for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. During investigation, he has confessed his guilt. The allegation is that Rs.80,000/- was looted at the point of pistol and knife. The petitioner has been in custody since 25.07.2011. The petitioner has been granted bail in other cases. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10659 of 2012 (2) dt.07-03-2012 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Gopalganj P.S. Case No.376/2010 with the following conditions : 1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence. 3. The petitioner will be well re-represented in the court. 4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned court and he will be taken into custody forthwith. V.K. Pandey/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.