Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25441 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 25441 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajo Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2 18-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case under [STATUTE] and later on added [STATUTE] . A looted chain was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which was identified by Bimla Mishra the prosecution witness. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one co- accused Manoj Mahto his relative brought the chain. However, it has been submitted that though the recovery of the chain was made from the possession of the petitioner but the petitioner himself was not put on Test Identification Parade for his identification or implication in this case. Though the occurrence is of 07.12.2011, the chain was recovered from the possession of the petitioner on 08.01.2012. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25441 of 2012 (2) dt.18-07-2012 The petitioner was remanded in this case on 12.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except this case there is one case against the petitioner. Taking into consideration the custody of the petitioner i.e. 12.01.2012, the petitioner above named is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Rail) Barauni at Begusarai in connection with Bachchwara P. S. Case No. 12 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be the near relative of the petitioner who shall file affidavit to the effect that the petitioner is not involved in any case except these two cases as stated above and shall swear affidavit that the petitioner shall not indulge in any such activity in future and if any involvement of the petitioner in any such activity shall be reported to the court concerned then the trial court shall proceed for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner. Kundan/- (Gopal Prasad, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 394

Statute Text:
Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing or attempting to commit robbery, or any other person jointly concerned in such robbery. If any person, in committing or in attempting to commit robbery, voluntarily causes hurt, such person, and any other person jointly concerned in committing or attempting to commit such robbery, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.