Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40010 of 2012 ====================================================== Chinta Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 01-11-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The accusation against the petitioner and her husband is of taking loan of Rs.9.5 lakhs on the basis of forged documents. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that out of loan amount Rs. 6 lakhs has already been paid and the husband of the petitioner is repaying the loan amount. It is appears that Pawan Kumar Singh has been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 28620 of 2012. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40010 of 2012 (2) dt.01-11-2012 2/2 This Court sees no reason for learned court below not to give same privilege to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and file undertaking for repaying the loan amount along with the interest within the time frame permitted by the bank in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 150 of 2011 pending in the court of learned CJM, Patna. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.