Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4159 of 2012 ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar@Amit Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Rajesh Kr. Singh. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.03.2011 in a case registered under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of killing the railway driver and taking away his official mobile and some cash amount. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. It is alleged that from the possession of the petitioner the alleged mobile of the deceased was recovered. It is submitted by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner that the EMI number of the recovered mobile was different from Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4159 of 2012 (2) dt.13-02-2012 2 / 2 2 that of the EMI number of the deceased official mobile and neither and the petitioner nor the alleged mobile has been put on T.I. Parade. Considering the fact that the investigation is complete, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Rail P.S. Case No. 11 of 2011. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.