Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5698 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5698 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Faiyaz @ Gidra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-02-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 16.10.2011 in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged against the petitioner and three others to have robbed the mobile, watch and ornaments. The petitioner was identified in the torch light since he was the neighbour of the informant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only because the petitioner was neighbour, he has been implicated as there was no recovery and that chargesheet has been submitted. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Munger in Kotwali P.S. Case no. 170 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5698 of 2012 (2) dt.29-02-2012 of 2011. The learned court below will cancel the bail of the petitioner either in case he is found indulged in similar nature of offence or defaults on three consecutive dates. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 392

Statute Text:
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Robbery. Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.