Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13997 of 2012 (2) dt.05-04-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13997 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Dara Paswan S/O Rambriksh Paswan Resident Of Village- Barhi Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti (Chakand), District- Gaya 2. Dinesh Das S/O late Kailash Das Resident Of Village- Barhi Bigha, P.S.- Chandauti (Chakand), District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-04-2012 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in connection with a case instituted for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] and section 27 of the Arms. It is stated that a general and omnibus allegation has been made against fifteen named accused persons including the petitioners. There is land dispute. Though the allegation is that they were armed with fire arm, the same was not used. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Sudama Paswan, Ramashray Paswan, Arun Das, Ganesh Das, Awadhesh Das and Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar have already been granted anticipatory bail by order dated 16.3.2012 passed in Cr.Misc. No.38687 of 2011 by another of this court. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioners named above are directed Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13997 of 2012 (2) dt.05-04-2012 to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti (Chakand) P.S. Case No.136 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority (iii) that they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they want to remain absent, then they shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they shall immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through counsel (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this court. Md.S./- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 307

Statute Text:
Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Attempt to murder. Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either to imprisonment for life, or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned. Attempts by Life Convicts: When any person offending under this section is under sentence of imprisonment for life, he may, if hurt is caused, be punished with death.