Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13509 of 2012 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 27-04-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was earlier permitted to be withdrawn vide order dated 02.02.2012 passed by a coordinate bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 41627 of 2011. Now the matter has been placed before this Court in pursuance to the order dated 04.04.2012 passed by coordinate bench and the administrative order dated 10.04.2012 of Hon’ble Chief Justice. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that now the matter has been compromised. This Court finds no reason to revise the earlier order. Let learned Court below consider regular bail of the petitioner keeping in view of the retracted version of the informant. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13509 of 2012 (3) dt.27-04-2012 2 / 2 2 With the observations above, the application stands disposed off in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 114 of 2011, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. Shageer/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 379

Statute Text:
Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Theft. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.