Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.166 of 2012 Chandan Dangi Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 10.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 25.08.2011 in a case registered for the offence under [STATUTE] . The petitioner’s name sprang up on confession of the co-accused. The petitioner has not been put on T. I. Parade nor any recovery has been made from his possession. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Sherghaty (Gaya)in connection with Barachatty P.S. Case No. 30 of 2010. Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.