Case Facts:
1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39556 of 2012 ====================================================== Karu Turi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-10-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition, as prayed for. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . Train dacoity was committed when the FIR was lodged against unknown. Name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of co accused who gave the petitioner’s address as resident of Rajala village. It is submitted that the petitioner is a resident of village Tahba and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent when no recovery has been made from the petitioner. It appears that others have been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 5915 and 9117 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, this court sees no Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39556 of 2012 (2) dt.17-10-2012 2/2 reason for the learned court below not to give similar relief to the petitioner in case the petitioner surrenders within six weeks from today in connection with GRP Jhajha P.S. Case no. 30 of 2010 pending in the court of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul, Lakhisarai. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction. Let this order be transmitted through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 395

Statute Text:
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.