Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31700 of 2012 (4) dt.26-11-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31700 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Neeta Prasad W/O Shri Satish Chandra Prasad R/O Mohalla - A.G. Colony, Beside Road No. - 4, Nutan Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti, P.S. Shastrinagar, Town & District - Patna 2. Satish Chandra Prasad S/O Late Hari Nath Prasad R/O Mohalla - A.G. Colony, Beside Road No. - 4, Nutan Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti, P.S. Shastrinagar, Town & District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 26-11-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant- bank and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under [STATUTE] . It is alleged against the petitioners that they took loan of rupees ten lacs from Bank of Baroda on the basis of a forged title deed. The petitioners undertake to deposit the entire loan amount along with up to date interest within one year. Considering the aforesaid stand, let the above named petitioners be released on provisional anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31700 of 2012 (4) dt.26-11-2012 period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the petitioners will be accepted on deposit of rupees fifty thousand and the provisional bail will be confirmed by the learned court below on deposit of the entire amount. The said amount will be released in favour of the bank on the undertaking of the bank that it will not only withdraw the present prosecution against the petitioners but also before the DRTA. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.