Case Facts:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3830 of 2012 Manish Kumar Singh @ Bindu Singh @ Bindu Kumar Singh son of Ambika Prasad Singh, resident of village-Sakhuwa, P.S.- Murliganj, District-Madhepura Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence under [STATUTE] . It is submitted that there is nothing on record to suggest that the vehicle in question which is said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner is a stolen property. The petitioner is in custody since 25.5.2011. The chargesheet in this case has already been submitted and his custodial interrogation is not required. He is not likely to abscond or tamper with the evidence of the case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond with two solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Araria in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No.50 of 2011 corresponding to S.T. No.1134 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) that both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioner who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with 2 the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority, (iii) that he shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstance for remaining absent, he shall immediately inform the court and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel and (iv) that liberty is given to the State to make an appropriate application for modification/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioner violates any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 413

Statute Text:
Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code. Habitually dealing in stolen property. Whoever habitually receives or deals in property which he knows or has reason to believe to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.