Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42498 of 2012 (2) dt.12-12-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42498 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Bindeshwari Yadav S/O Late Chichai Yadav Resident Of Village- Raniganj Meghutola, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria 2. Maheshwari Yadav S/O Basudeo Yadav Resident Of Village- Raniganj Meghutola, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria 3. Kamleshwari Yadav @ Kamleshwari Prasad Yadav S/O Adhik Lal Yadav Resident Of Village- Hasanpur, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Basudeo Yadav S/O Late Chichai Yadav Resident Of Village- Raniganj Vantha Tola, Police Station- Raniganj, District- Araria .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-12-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under [STATUTE] . The accusation is of obtaining compromise decree in a partition suit on the basis of forged compromise application. It is submitted that the petitioner challenged the compromise decree in miscellaneous case and civil revision application when both the courts decided the matter against the complainant then the present case has been filed. It is further submitted that during investigation accusation was found false and final form was submitted but differing with the same cognizance Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42498 of 2012 (2) dt.12-12-2012 has been taken. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM, Ist Class, Araria in connection with Case no. 3632 C of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Applicable IPC Section: 468

Statute Text:
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Forgery for the purpose of cheating. Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.