Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45035 of 2011 (3) dt.23-02-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45035 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Khursheed Ansari, son of Hasim Ansari 2. Mahfooz Ansari, son of Khurshid Ansari 3. Mahjub Ansari, son of Khurshid Ansari 4. Noor Ansari, son of Khurshid Ansari All are resident of village – Ilmas Nagar, P.S. – Khanpur, District – Samastipur. 5. Zabbar Ansari, son of Late Adhan Ansari, resident of villag e- Kadirchak, P.S. – Khanpur, District – Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 23-02-2012 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The five petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under [STATUTE] , and 3(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, are named accused in this case with allegation of misbehave, assault and abuse. Submission is of false implication in retaliation of the case of earlier instituted Khanpur P.S. Case No. 151/2011 and also this case appears squarely covered under the decision of Apex Court in a case Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of A.P. reported in 2009(1) BCCR 153(SC). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45035 of 2011 (3) dt.23-02-2012 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Applicable IPC Section: 341

Statute Text:
Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code. Wrongfully restraining any person. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.