Case Facts:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2651 of 2011 (3) dt.05-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2651 of 2011 ====================================================== Sikendra Kumar @ Rishideo .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma, Adv. For the State : Mr. M.N.Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 05-03-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is challenging the order dated 4th November, 2010 taking cognizance for offences under [STATUTE] . In the present case, there is allegation of committing forgery. It is submitted that the petitioner himself submitted that it does not bear the signature of petitioner as he has not signed which cannot be looked into at this stage as F.I.R. states appointment made in second time is of other person. Disputed question of fact and defence of petitioner cannot be looked into. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However liberty is given to the petitioner to take all these points at the time of framing of charge. Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2651 of 2011 (3) dt.05-03-2012

Applicable IPC Section: 420

Statute Text:
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating and there by dishonestly inducing delivery of property, or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.