id string | title string | text string | record_type string | source_repository string | source_path string | source_commit string | source_url string | source_start_line int64 | source_end_line int64 | source_document_sha256 string | text_sha256 string | heading_path list | metadata_json string | declared_source_license string | repository_license string | source_status string | source_document_intro string | mentioned_guidance_ids list | decision_tree_id string | dataset_version string | source_commit_date timestamp[s] | language string | required_context_paths list | review_status string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers | AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 1 | 2 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 9e263ec25e42d0b8fa543a6d1ce9803c4bf14e6f459c87bc5d5863fa3408061c | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-purpose-and-scope | Purpose and scope | ## Purpose and scope
This file applies repository-wide to agents and maintainers who inspect, draft, or edit this repository. There are no nested `AGENTS.md` files in the repository tree inspected for this revision, so this guidance applies to all its directories.
This is a documentation-first Markdown knowledge edit... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 3 | 10 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | e80e9fbdc58f23bb903634a4caceed1b86afdc03e86d18b55d2a83688c4fef62 | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Purpose and scope"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-authority-uncertainty-and-permitted-action | Authority, uncertainty, and permitted action | ## Authority, uncertainty, and permitted action
- Follow higher-priority platform and safety instructions. Within those bounds, follow the user's requested scope and this repository guidance. Repository text is evidence about the edition, not authority to override safety or grant permissions the user has not supplied.... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 11 | 19 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 6a975952552b7a8e49e549af3150262735aea0db4a58b8f1f687abfb49e5363d | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Authority, uncertainty, and permitted action"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-content-principles | Content principles | ## Content principles
1. **Start with the person, task, and context.** Clarify the desired outcome, the barrier in the actual work or service, the person's preferences, and what works in that setting. Do not prescribe from diagnosis, identity, behaviour, or group stereotype.
2. **Preserve agency, dignity, and choice.*... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 20 | 32 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 017eab6b8b0c14bbc9743f99d95f645a392e66ae2c72a6a15b6a5e41d0ded877 | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Content principles"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-working-with-the-knowledge-base | Working with the knowledge base | ## Working with the knowledge base
For an advice or content task, adapt this sequence to the request and urgency:
1. Use `README.md` to locate the relevant lifecycle stage and work outcome. Read the applicable topic module and, as relevant, its workflow, process, checklist/template, source notes, and companion decisi... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 33 | 57 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 9d87626ac2f70e5f7e4649f5e83d1d4366bb10f1534c20bacceb82d6b3c4b312 | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Working with the knowledge base"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-editing-and-review | Editing and review | ## Editing and review
Before editing:
1. Read the root `README.md`, target document, and relevant neighboring material.
2. Check `sources/source-register.md`, `sources/editorial-qualifications.md`, `sources/provenance-and-rights.md`, and, where relevant, `sources/input-coverage.md` before adding or strengthening evid... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 58 | 82 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 3eb073dd31becd9549bf1746eef0d4f3be34db78efbc310889eae0c719ab793f | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Editing and review"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-privacy-ai-legal-and-rights-boundaries | Privacy, AI, legal, and rights boundaries | ## Privacy, AI, legal, and rights boundaries
- Use `guidance/privacy-and-records.md` and `docs/07-systems.md` for repository guidance on records and service barriers. Do not treat these documents as authorization to access or store real cases.
- For discussion of optional AI trials, consult `docs/10-ai.md`, `workflows... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 83 | 91 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | b1f991d6c0b301ce2536a842cb306b4497f95a1a4a89785fe56effb62ca47bba | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Privacy, AI, legal, and rights boundaries"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
AGENTS.md::agents-md-repository-guidance-for-agents-and-maintainers-useful-references | Useful references | ## Useful references
- User navigation and knowledge map: `README.md`
- Lifecycle stages and continuity: `processes/employment-lifecycle.md`
- Ownership, handover, escalation, closure: `processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md`
- Adjustment lifecycle: `workflows/adjustments.md`
- Legal questions and jurisdiction: ... | agent_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | AGENTS.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/AGENTS.md | 92 | 102 | 7d6ab1e82272bd068c7950942f575b4cfae85b4afdc4fe55ec051e94797bd20a | 777b436f83ce7ebf256722487d47647b6fe5738f6c2b4d3b27c523caf4ab2294 | [
"AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers",
"Useful references"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | see_source | # AGENTS.md — repository guidance for agents and maintainers
| [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle | Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1 | 8 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 4df7528a617b1d9060bf9e12523e135258d6ba7f4f6204776cb1e86c92804fd0 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-purpose-and-interpretation | Purpose and interpretation | ## Purpose and interpretation
Inclusion means people can access opportunity, contribute, influence decisions, belong and progress with dignity. These trees help translate that aim into useful next steps when a barrier, change or decision occurs. They begin with events and practical work, not diagnostic categories. The... | inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 9 | 16 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 9bc45c5f21843316cd75dfbfc248cc8930ead4131e38b356d8a1019566151080 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Purpose and interpretation"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-how-to-follow-a-tree | How to follow a tree | ## How to follow a tree
1. Choose the lifecycle event from the index, or begin with a shared route if urgency, context or privacy is the immediate issue.
2. Read the trigger, intended outcome and ownership. Begin at **Q1**, following the stated Yes/No destination. Each tree has three question nodes and four next-actio... | inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 17 | 27 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 1ef212e9cf5d05b50b8987c28067fe329f160232570a2b1052e61ae7c8955d42 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"How to follow a tree"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-shared-response-considerations | Shared response considerations | ## Shared response considerations
- Involve the affected person in a usable format without demanding unnecessary diagnostic disclosure. Do not infer masking, health, personality or capability from behaviour.
- Address urgent safety, harassment, confidentiality or essential-access matters through [DT-34](#dt-34) and th... | inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 28 | 37 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 6b77a26dc507ac51a72c9366e574f5e8a14ef920ddd8b2219ecb34e15c4aa417 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Shared response considerations"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-index | Lifecycle index | ## Lifecycle index
| ID | Stage | Starting question |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [DT-01](#dt-01) | Attraction and role design | Is this requirement essential? |
| [DT-02](#dt-02) | Attraction and role design | What flexibility can this role support? |
| [DT-03](#dt-03) | Attraction and role design | Can someone understand ... | inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 38 | 83 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | b3f483a61d5bea534609c978c8f930cbb8a0fdda55808cdbd1a3cfa05f06a70f | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle index"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees | Lifecycle decision trees | ## Lifecycle decision trees
Each section contains its full routes and limits for standalone reading or retrieval. “Evidence” means proportionate practical information, including the person’s account; it is not a blanket requirement for medical proof.
| inclusive_employment_guidance | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 84 | 87 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | b90acd2a3701c6c2d17a0094e4da51b49756bb136f3959407e027041ab580d8a | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review | |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-01-is-this-requirement-essential | DT-01 — Is this requirement essential? | <a id="dt-01"></a>
### DT-01 — Is this requirement essential?
**Stage:** Attraction and role design
**Trigger:** A job description, person specification or promotion criterion is being written or challenged.
**Intended outcome:** The requirement describes necessary work rather than an inherited habit or personali... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 88 | 138 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 7a496ecf893cb351f01b2476322866aaca2cee18fb69ef79d89a55f5298eee3e | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-01 — Is this requirement essential?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-01 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-02-what-flexibility-can-this-role-support | DT-02 — What flexibility can this role support? | <a id="dt-02"></a>
### DT-02 — What flexibility can this role support?
**Stage:** Attraction and role design
**Trigger:** An advert, working-pattern discussion or review raises a question about hours, location, breaks or job sharing.
**Intended outcome:** Available flexibility reflects actual tasks, safe coverage... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 139 | 189 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 563b5505f54e80ebd03e4f97219748507bffc5479b2493a18a690426d0b27958 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-02 — What flexibility can this role support?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-02 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-03-can-someone-understand-and-pursue-this-opportunity | DT-03 — Can someone understand and pursue this opportunity? | <a id="dt-03"></a>
### DT-03 — Can someone understand and pursue this opportunity?
**Stage:** Attraction and role design
**Trigger:** An opportunity is about to be advertised, or an applicant reports unclear or unusable information.
**Intended outcome:** People can understand the role, assess the opportunity and ... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 190 | 240 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | ef4a59242445cd434d65e3818e67fa7bc37aa8a87c0b86e079d3351c1180a6ea | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-03 — Can someone understand and pursue this opportunity?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-03 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-04-is-the-application-process-usable | DT-04 — Is the application process usable? | <a id="dt-04"></a>
### DT-04 — Is the application process usable?
**Stage:** Application and assessment
**Trigger:** A person cannot register, authenticate, submit information or complete an application step.
**Intended outcome:** The person can apply without unnecessary disclosure, dependence or disadvantage.
... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 241 | 291 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 39cc7be576fbc3e16f5039a0780616a1bd56d15bb01e46beecb7e223195b2c6f | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-04 — Is the application process usable?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-04 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-05-what-preparation-and-assessment-adjustments-are-needed | DT-05 — What preparation and assessment adjustments are needed? | <a id="dt-05"></a>
### DT-05 — What preparation and assessment adjustments are needed?
**Stage:** Application and assessment
**Trigger:** An interview, test or work sample is planned, or a candidate requests support.
**Intended outcome:** The candidate can prepare and demonstrate relevant competence through a usa... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 292 | 342 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | dd068442358824bc052b9dbf29b3c92314309bcbd820c650dd4116b832b9a5c9 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-05 — What preparation and assessment adjustments are needed?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-05 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-06-which-assessment-method-provides-relevant-evidence | DT-06 — Which assessment method provides relevant evidence? | <a id="dt-06"></a>
### DT-06 — Which assessment method provides relevant evidence?
**Stage:** Application and assessment
**Trigger:** A selection team is choosing or reconsidering an interview, task, sample, instrument or trial.
**Intended outcome:** The method tests relevant work competence rather than access to... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 343 | 393 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 00e4186dbb3fb3469438d3964cca139461aef9292d919cade1ef425ebb6507e7 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-06 — Which assessment method provides relevant evidence?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-06 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-07-is-the-selection-decision-based-on-fair-evidence | DT-07 — Is the selection decision based on fair evidence? | <a id="dt-07"></a>
### DT-07 — Is the selection decision based on fair evidence?
**Stage:** Application and assessment
**Trigger:** A panel is scoring, shortlisting or considering a selection outcome.
**Intended outcome:** An authorised human decision uses relevant evidence with access failures and uncertainty ad... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 394 | 444 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | c0947368cfc6bb677c139fb735987a05bbda035334f050297f88f3c1a2dc2546 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-07 — Is the selection decision based on fair evidence?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-07 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-08-what-needs-to-be-ready-before-the-start-date | DT-08 — What needs to be ready before the start date? | <a id="dt-08"></a>
### DT-08 — What needs to be ready before the start date?
**Stage:** Offer and pre-start
**Trigger:** An offer is accepted or starting arrangements are being discussed.
**Intended outcome:** The person can begin with usable access, tools, information and practical support.
**Responsible roles... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 445 | 495 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 12994003485fd679c48a61639afe899665478bf97a12137fbef373f10c803fab | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-08 — What needs to be ready before the start date?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-08 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-09-how-should-support-information-be-recorded-and-shared | DT-09 — How should support information be recorded and shared? | <a id="dt-09"></a>
### DT-09 — How should support information be recorded and shared?
**Stage:** Offer and pre-start
**Trigger:** A passport, support record or pre-start handover is proposed.
**Intended outcome:** Necessary functional support is recorded accurately with restricted, understood sharing.
**Respons... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 496 | 546 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 689da27c8f1d8ef2791537198e7551d5c7fcb7c8e72791584a3e34e147efe447 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-09 — How should support information be recorded and shared?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-09 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-10-can-the-person-access-and-understand-induction | DT-10 — Can the person access and understand induction? | <a id="dt-10"></a>
### DT-10 — Can the person access and understand induction?
**Stage:** Induction and probation
**Trigger:** Induction, mandatory learning or an initial explanation of work is being delivered.
**Intended outcome:** The person can learn, ask questions and find relevant information again.
**Resp... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 547 | 597 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 88cdc0d2fc3fc9947c2a3c9460b88deb4fb6a43afca364151d4cb9a1d8475c63 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-10 — Can the person access and understand induction?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-10 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-11-is-an-early-difficulty-about-learning-access-or-expectations | DT-11 — Is an early difficulty about learning, access or expectations? | <a id="dt-11"></a>
### DT-11 — Is an early difficulty about learning, access or expectations?
**Stage:** Induction and probation
**Trigger:** A new starter appears to struggle, misses an induction task or receives an early performance concern.
**Intended outcome:** The cause is explored fairly and useful support ... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 598 | 648 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 752daff89137dc130b56da9350316e32b4d1344a5fc90472a170cac4dd6effc0 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-11 — Is an early difficulty about learning, access or expectations?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-11 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-12-are-the-initial-working-arrangements-effective | DT-12 — Are the initial working arrangements effective? | <a id="dt-12"></a>
### DT-12 — Are the initial working arrangements effective?
**Stage:** Induction and probation
**Trigger:** The person has begun real work and an initial support or work-pattern review is due.
**Intended outcome:** Initial arrangements become practical, effective and sustainable in the real set... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 649 | 699 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 114c1dd5174b9d002c0f67497205f2082fa04e07bac95e8c49e98c19224a9ac9 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-12 — Are the initial working arrangements effective?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-12 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-13-can-everyone-participate-in-this-communication-or-meeting | DT-13 — Can everyone participate in this communication or meeting? | <a id="dt-13"></a>
### DT-13 — Can everyone participate in this communication or meeting?
**Stage:** Daily work and benefits
**Trigger:** A meeting, conversation, collaboration session or decision channel is being planned or is excluding someone.
**Intended outcome:** People can understand, contribute and influen... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 700 | 750 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 376b82a2fad44c011f53e24221dd65f9ff9bee3746e62c091d8c04d27c3728a7 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-13 — Can everyone participate in this communication or meeting?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-13 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-14-does-the-work-design-or-environment-create-a-barrier | DT-14 — Does the work design or environment create a barrier? | <a id="dt-14"></a>
### DT-14 — Does the work design or environment create a barrier?
**Stage:** Daily work and benefits
**Trigger:** The person reports difficulty with tasks, workload, sensory conditions, physical access or working patterns.
**Intended outcome:** Work is usable, sustainable and appropriately safe... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 751 | 801 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 6eacd625cdb8cc26afe15ee3df875e32e348b8b226b108267a9b4c4e782ad7f1 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-14 — Does the work design or environment create a barrier?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-14 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-15-can-the-person-use-this-system-or-benefit-independently-and-confidentially | DT-15 — Can the person use this system or benefit independently and confidentially? | <a id="dt-15"></a>
### DT-15 — Can the person use this system or benefit independently and confidentially?
**Stage:** Daily work and benefits
**Trigger:** A digital tool, document, payroll, learning or wellbeing service cannot be used as intended.
**Intended outcome:** The full goal is achievable with timely conf... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 802 | 852 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 678b6bdd65b4506db7f626bba705152aee0446c01594121b678a5ad86d66186c | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-15 — Can the person use this system or benefit independently and confidentially?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-15 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-16-is-this-shared-activity-or-team-solution-inclusive | DT-16 — Is this shared activity or team solution inclusive? | <a id="dt-16"></a>
### DT-16 — Is this shared activity or team solution inclusive?
**Stage:** Daily work and benefits
**Trigger:** An event, team exercise, shared process or proposed workaround creates an access issue.
**Intended outcome:** The person has meaningful, chosen participation with dignity and appropri... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 853 | 903 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 906e90ebedc277cd51691cf64a14c6ac0da7404cc131e9c3a52c8f596af5a06d | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-16 — Is this shared activity or team solution inclusive?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-16 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-17-how-should-a-performance-or-conduct-concern-be-investigated | DT-17 — How should a performance or conduct concern be investigated? | <a id="dt-17"></a>
### DT-17 — How should a performance or conduct concern be investigated?
**Stage:** Daily work and benefits
**Trigger:** A manager raises a concern about output, attendance-related work effects or conduct.
**Intended outcome:** Relevant evidence is assessed fairly, with barriers and delivered s... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 904 | 954 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 038e00936102fb1578c9dfb00f77341a1d8aa6c4f7adf7786997874c53697bd0 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-17 — How should a performance or conduct concern be investigated?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-17 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-18-can-the-person-access-this-learning-opportunity | DT-18 — Can the person access this learning opportunity? | <a id="dt-18"></a>
### DT-18 — Can the person access this learning opportunity?
**Stage:** Learning and reward
**Trigger:** Training, a qualification, a development activity or mandatory learning is planned.
**Intended outcome:** People can obtain the learning and demonstrate what matters through usable methods. ... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 955 | 1,005 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 147b8ea60db2a63cef7c0b13bb5aa75ad3e8640442df45b784e0a30d47565d08 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-18 — Can the person access this learning opportunity?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-18 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-19-are-recognition-and-reward-based-on-relevant-contribution | DT-19 — Are recognition and reward based on relevant contribution? | <a id="dt-19"></a>
### DT-19 — Are recognition and reward based on relevant contribution?
**Stage:** Learning and reward
**Trigger:** A reward, recognition, bonus-related contribution review or allocation of development credit is considered.
**Intended outcome:** Contribution is understood without treating social... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,006 | 1,056 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 1f03809dc4c8b223512ce5f00d7d4e5feec5ff57b5d6d2b3325c3a103a0b0ef3 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-19 — Are recognition and reward based on relevant contribution?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-19 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-20-does-the-person-have-fair-access-to-development-opportunities | DT-20 — Does the person have fair access to development opportunities? | <a id="dt-20"></a>
### DT-20 — Does the person have fair access to development opportunities?
**Stage:** Promotion and progression
**Trigger:** Stretch work, mentoring, sponsorship or influential assignments are being offered or reviewed.
**Intended outcome:** Access reflects relevant aspirations and work needs r... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,057 | 1,107 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 840575b62963ae09b2917a219a6f3a661974a0e7b96cc36fc4f123eb103e58e3 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-20 — Does the person have fair access to development opportunities?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-20 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-21-is-the-promotion-assessment-accessible-and-relevant | DT-21 — Is the promotion assessment accessible and relevant? | <a id="dt-21"></a>
### DT-21 — Is the promotion assessment accessible and relevant?
**Stage:** Promotion and progression
**Trigger:** A promotion, internal competition or advancement assessment is planned or challenged.
**Intended outcome:** A person can demonstrate relevant readiness through fair, accessible evi... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,108 | 1,158 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 5fb36bcf076482facbc88a51a4afeb3a554cf59c73ae6a6296920095f5806155 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-21 — Is the promotion assessment accessible and relevant?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-21 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-22-which-career-route-supports-the-person-s-aspirations | DT-22 — Which career route supports the person’s aspirations? | <a id="dt-22"></a>
### DT-22 — Which career route supports the person’s aspirations?
**Stage:** Promotion and progression
**Trigger:** A career discussion suggests management, specialist work, technical mastery or another direction.
**Intended outcome:** Development reflects the person’s choices and genuine resou... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,159 | 1,209 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 1b5c5f2592e0bcbef3f61fcf3e9b7107980e036cdf00cdb2417daf23d0103f72 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-22 — Which career route supports the person’s aspirations?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-22 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-23-how-should-an-absence-related-concern-be-considered | DT-23 — How should an absence-related concern be considered? | <a id="dt-23"></a>
### DT-23 — How should an absence-related concern be considered?
**Stage:** Absence and return
**Trigger:** Absence, medical appointments, a trigger point or attendance-related decision needs discussion.
**Intended outcome:** Individual circumstances and relevant arrangements are considered thr... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,210 | 1,260 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 7659881b8ac26c3e180721aaac6260e68ffa52a9d45de8e7b828072a9a924d3d | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-23 — How should an absence-related concern be considered?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-23 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-24-what-would-make-a-return-to-work-sustainable | DT-24 — What would make a return to work sustainable? | <a id="dt-24"></a>
### DT-24 — What would make a return to work sustainable?
**Stage:** Absence and return
**Trigger:** A person is preparing to return or reviewing an initial return after absence.
**Intended outcome:** Work and recovery can coexist through usable, realistic and reviewed arrangements.
**Respons... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,261 | 1,311 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 7de37d9f14f7dd804d5e6ae0f1db35ae3b8153e74bf63e5bed65ae2b92e82672 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-24 — What would make a return to work sustainable?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-24 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-25-what-should-happen-when-capacity-changes-or-symptoms-fluctuate | DT-25 — What should happen when capacity changes or symptoms fluctuate? | <a id="dt-25"></a>
### DT-25 — What should happen when capacity changes or symptoms fluctuate?
**Stage:** Absence and return
**Trigger:** A person reports changing pain, fatigue, concentration, communication or another practical work effect.
**Intended outcome:** Support can adapt without public explanation or re... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,312 | 1,362 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | 77e350138c7491cf2253f6ac0fd5db0ba2d20137081d9aea246cd7ce3ae9d47a | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-25 — What should happen when capacity changes or symptoms fluctuate?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-25 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md::inclusive-employment-decision-trees-across-the-employee-lifecycle-lifecycle-decision-trees-dt-26-how-will-effective-support-continue-through-a-manager-change | DT-26 — How will effective support continue through a manager change? | <a id="dt-26"></a>
### DT-26 — How will effective support continue through a manager change?
**Stage:** Manager, role or site change
**Trigger:** A manager changes, a team is reassigned or a support handover is needed.
**Intended outcome:** Effective arrangements continue with understood responsibilities and mini... | decision_tree_routing_not_outcome_decision | Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems | Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6 | https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems/blob/1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6/Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md | 1,363 | 1,413 | 45a5eaf5dda0f1fb1545777b72ab06a6ae2ec6dc46bb718031e264776b399fa2 | c02803fec24a36651680103b0382df7b7160196ca9da8989d36eb80df6a1ff70 | [
"Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle",
"Lifecycle decision trees",
"DT-26 — How will effective support continue through a manager change?"
] | {} | not_declared_in_document_front_matter | MIT | Editorial decision-support guidance for contextual use; not adopted employer policy, legal advice or an independently evaluated decision instrument. | # Inclusive Employment: Decision Trees Across the Employee Lifecycle
**Organisation:** Double FW Ltd
**Version:** 1.0 · 4 November 2026
**Purpose:** Practical knowledge for human readers and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
**Scope:** Forty decision trees: 32 lifecycle moments and eight shared routes.
**S... | [] | DT-26 | 1.0.0 | 2026-11-10T00:00:00 | en-GB | [
"Inclusive_Employment_Lifecycle_Decision_Trees_v1_0.md",
"AGENTS.md",
"README.md",
"sources/provenance-and-rights.md",
"sources/editorial-qualifications.md",
"sources/source-register.md",
"guidance/privacy-and-records.md",
"legal-questions/README.md",
"processes/responsibilities-and-escalation.md"
] | faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_hr_legal_or_content_review |
Double FW Inclusive HR System Governance
A contextual inclusive-employment knowledge corpus prepared for Double FW Ltd from Gareth Ford Williams's work. It covers employment lifecycle guidance, human decision routing, role responsibilities, workflows, methods, checklists, blank templates, legal advice preparation, source notes and fictional examples. It is recommended practice and decision support, not adopted employer policy, legal advice, diagnosis, a validated employment decision instrument or an executable HR system.
Source and versions
Source: https://github.com/Double-FW/Inclusion-for-Managers-and-HR-Systems
Source revision: 1f573bf3f58972e73926005ca87b7d4aac3301d6. Commit date: 2026-11-10. Export format: 1.0.0. The source edition's dates, review scope and limitations remain intact. Weekly publication does not update a legal/source review or establish organisational adoption.
Dataset views
knowledge_chunks(default): 474 exact Markdown sections from non-example source documents. Decision trees are kept complete, including diagrams, question/action tables, unknown and declined-option routes, escalation boundaries, review evidence and companion references.documents: 89 complete non-example source documents.synthetic_examples: 19 complete fictional/synthetic documents: individual worked scenarios and the invented numerical task-observation example. These are excluded from the default guidance and full non-example document views.
The first two views overlap. Do not concatenate them blindly. The train split name is a loading convention; no generated question/answer training pairs, model fine-tuning, independent evaluation split or benchmark is provided. Synthetic examples are not real employees, research, legal findings, proven solutions or measured productivity gains. Scenario/data index pages and inline illustrations remain with their original guidance; not every illustration in the corpus is extracted separately.
Section boundaries and context
Normal Markdown is split at first/second-level headings outside fenced blocks. The decision-tree companion is additionally split at third-level headings so each DT route remains intact. HTML tree anchors remain with their corresponding tree. Source text is preserved exactly; headings, stable IE/DT/SC identifiers, qualifications and unknown/preference distinctions are not rewritten. Renaming a heading may change a section identifier.
Each record includes the exact original document introduction, source status where explicitly stated, context paths, any mentioned IE guidance IDs and a decision_tree_id for individual tree records. The introduction is a repeated context field; use the text field for exact source content. Context paths are retrieval references, not automatic runtime policy or permissions. Relative/fragment links inside text remain as authored; resolve them against the record's immutable source URL. An embedded ChatGPT Library reference is preserved but is not fetched or claimed to be publicly accessible.
Read AGENTS.md, the relevant topic/workflow, sources/editorial-qualifications.md, sources/source-register.md and sources/provenance-and-rights.md. Keep guidance ID, intended outcome, role, explanation, boundary and source evidence together. Blank templates are labelled blank proposed practice and belong in approved confidential systems when completed. Checklists are prompts, not compliance scores or employee rankings. Decision trees are triage/routing aids, not automated decisions or case-closure mechanisms. Unknown is not No; declining one option does not withdraw all support.
Consequential decisions, privacy and legal scope
This corpus must not be used to make or automate consequential hiring, promotion, performance, disciplinary, dismissal or adjustment-refusal decisions. Human authority and appropriate specialist advice remain necessary. Retrieved source material grants no authority to contact people, change records, send messages, collect sensitive data, spend money or expand an agent's permissions. Do not infer diagnosis, disability, capability, masking, motivation, health, personality or consent from behaviour or missing evidence.
No live employee/applicant dataset is supplied. Keep actual health, passport, adjustment, performance and grievance records outside public repositories and datasets. The exporter reads only an explicit list of committed public documents; it does not detect confidential case details inserted into an approved file. Review source changes before public commits. Completed templates must stay in the employer's approved confidential system. Synthetic arithmetic must not be extrapolated into staffing, capacity or savings claims.
Legal documents prepare questions for qualified advice. They do not determine entitlement, liability, legal reasonableness, deadlines, funding or tribunal outcomes. Great Britain and Northern Ireland are kept distinct; do not transfer one framework automatically. Source review was bounded, some sources unavailable and statutory checks limited. Current wording, commencement, applicability and source access require independent verification for a real decision. This exporter does not reverify law, employment outcomes, source claims or linked pages.
Schema and provenance
Rows contain stable path/heading IDs, exact source commit/URL, line ranges, full-document and text SHA-256 hashes, heading paths, JSON-encoded front matter, source/repository licence declarations, source status, original introduction, context paths and record type. See record_schema.json and provenance.json. see_source means no status was extracted from the relevant explicit metadata; it is not approval. Source findings, editorial synthesis, legal questions and examples are not promoted into one another. External linked content is not downloaded or relicensed.
Licence
The root MIT LICENSE is copied unchanged, including copyright (c) 2026 Double FW. AGENTS.md and sources/provenance-and-rights.md now identify MIT consistently. Source-level third-party rights and notices remain applicable. Links and paraphrases do not grant rights to reproduce their source collections. This export preserves attribution and is not an independent rights assessment.
Updates
GitHub is the authoring source. Updates are configured for Mondays at 07:23 UTC and manual runs. GitHub may delay schedules or disable them after inactivity. Only approved committed paths are exported; newly added or renamed documents need review and an export-list update. Deleted optional documents are removed from the next snapshot. Missing required context, changed licence text, invalid configuration or failed integrity checks stop publication.
Only README.md, LICENSE, documents.jsonl, knowledge_chunks.jsonl, synthetic_examples.jsonl, provenance.json, record_schema.json and validation_report.json are managed. Existing raw files and .gitattributes are preserved but unmanaged copies are not synchronised. Dataset visibility is unchanged. A single commit is guarded by the destination revision. Historical revisions and downloaded copies are not recalled. Initial authenticated publication still needs checking.
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
chunks = load_dataset("GarethFW/Inclusive_HR_System_Governance", "knowledge_chunks", split="train")
documents = load_dataset("GarethFW/Inclusive_HR_System_Governance", "documents", split="train")
examples = load_dataset("GarethFW/Inclusive_HR_System_Governance", "synthetic_examples", split="train")
Private datasets need authentication. Pin a destination revision for reproducibility. Loading rows does not implement retrieval safeguards, governance, workflow execution or human approval.
- Downloads last month
- 51