Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
guardrail
string
records_used
int64
raw_denial_rate
float64
mcfadden_r2_profile_only
float64
mcfadden_r2_with_lender
float64
door_effect_share_of_explained
float64
overlay_residual_top15_strict
list
overlay_residual_top15_lenient
list
reason_fingerprint_families
dict
Aggregate historical analysis only. No individual scoring function exists or is saved.
859,090
0.2188
0.1712
0.276
0.3797
[ { "lei": "549300YIQ7S7Z8PIHE53", "n": 22927, "denials": 18039, "actual": 0.787, "expected": 0.35, "overlay_residual_pp": 43.68, "name": "AMERISAVE MORTGAGE COMPANY" }, { "lei": "549300NOCASXPA34X033", "n": 7931, "denials": 5321, "actual": 0.671, "expected": 0.313,...
[ { "lei": "549300MHH03ICJYEPE85", "n": 5016, "denials": 572, "actual": 0.114, "expected": 0.327, "overlay_residual_pp": -21.334, "name": "549300MH…" }, { "lei": "549300S5YL3OH0IVCS62", "n": 7008, "denials": 828, "actual": 0.118, "expected": 0.311, "overlay_resi...
{ "aile_1": { "baskin_sebep_kodu": "4.0", "sebep_payi": 0.274, "uye_sayisi": 12, "ornek_uyeler": [ "254900M2C4Q6DATP2889", "549300EMNDEK4BA8WB53", "549300FGXN1K3HLB1R50", "549300HW662MN1WU8550", "549300JYXTZDSPJEPI44" ] }, "aile_2": { "baskin_sebep_kodu": "1.0...
Aggregate historical analysis only. No individual scoring function exists or is saved.
859,090
0.2188
0.1712
0.276
0.3797
null
null
null

The Door Effect — FHA Denial Variance Decomposition (2025)

38% of the explainable variation in FHA mortgage denial outcomes is the lender — not the file.

This dataset contains the published results of a variance decomposition over 859,090 FHA credit decisions from the complete public CFPB HMDA 2025 record. Two nested logistic models were compared: Model A uses only observable application characteristics in the federal record (income, loan amount, DTI band, small-loan flag, state); Model B adds a single variable — lender identity. Model A explains 17.1% of outcome variation (McFadden R²); Model B explains 27.6%. The difference — 37.97% of everything explainable — is the door. Demographic fields are deliberately excluded; this is a study of lender behavior, not borrowers.

Files

File Contents
summary.json Headline statistics: records used, raw denial rate, both R² values, door-effect share
lender_residuals.csv Top-15 strictest and top-15 most lenient doors: actual vs. mix-adjusted expected denial rate and the overlay residual (pp), with lender name and LEI
reason_families.csv Denial-reason fingerprint clusters: dominant reason code, reason share, member count, example member LEIs
door-effect-2025.json Canonical results file as published at financeratecalc.com (byte-identical to the site copy)

Read this before quoting

HMDA contains no credit scores. "Expected" is computed from the observable characteristics above, so the residual means excess denial not explained by observable federal-record characteristics — it is consistent with lender overlays, channel differences, documentation practices, and unobserved risk mix, and cannot by itself prove any single cause. All figures are historical and aggregate (minimum 500 decisions, 100 denials per lender). This dataset contains no individual predictions and never will: a denial is a data point, not a verdict on any applicant. No individual scoring function exists or is saved.

Provenance & reproducibility

Note: the canonical JSON keeps the original field names of the reason_fingerprint_families block (aile_* = family_*, baskin_sebep_kodu = dominant reason code, sebep_payi = reason share, uye_sayisi = member count, ornek_uyeler = example members). reason_families.csv provides the same data with English column names.

License & citation

CC BY 4.0 — reuse freely with attribution and a link back.

FinanceRateCalc (2026). The Door Effect: FHA Denial Variance Decomposition,
2025 Federal Record. https://financeratecalc.com/door-effect.html
Downloads last month
47