π© Report: Spam
#60
by Darylgolden - opened
The owner of the website specifically asked not to have their content scraped. This seems like a gross violation of ethics
Cara, in particular, has likely been scrapped more than once and may already exist as private data inside multiple labs, mixed in with other datasets. Such datasets will actually be images and not just URLs. There apparently was no restriction whatsoever or effort by Cara's team to prevent any activity. The "walled garden" was a fake, loosely monitored work that should not be taken lightly by its users. You cannot advocate AI-proof security if the site does not make any effort to make itself secure.